>> i'm sophia wenzler here in the newsroom . prime minister the newsroom. prime minister rishi sunak is facing calls to sack suella braverman after she defied sack suella braverman after she defied downing street with her met criticism. comments in an article in the times today. the home secretary accuses the metropolitan police of playing favourites with the pro—palestinian protesters . pro—palestinian protesters. labour's national campaign coordinator , pat mcfadden, says coordinator, pat mcfadden, says that she breached the code by failing to clear the editorial with number 10. london mayor sadiq khan says he's astonished by the article . by the article. >> i think her behaviour over the last few weeks has been behaviour that is irresponsible . behaviour that is irresponsible. well, her article in the times was incorrect and inflamed entry at a time when senior politicians should be bringing communities together, uniting people who have differences . people who have differences. instead, she is stoking divisions and i worry as a consequence of her words and her behaviour .

consequence of her words and her behaviour. you'll see this saturday an armistice day, the far right edl and other like people turning up on saturday causing problems . causing problems. >> meanwhile, veterans minister johnny mercer says people shouldn't feel discouraged from joining in the weekend's remembrance events in london. >> they're not going to be anywhere near the cenotaph and the metropolitan police are bending over backwards to make sure that everybody who comes up into london, whether you're selling poppies, you're selling poppies, whether you're attending a reunion or you're going remembrance, is going to remembrance, is completely and completely unmolested and allowed on what allowed to get on with what is a really special, important weekend this weekend , we spent weekend this weekend, we spent all making sure that can all week making sure that can happen. all week making sure that can happen . and really encourage happen. and i really encourage people to come into london and remember in the way we always do this weekend . this weekend. >> israel has agreed to a series of pauses in fighting in northern gaza. the white house says there'll be daily four hour pauses starting from today. it comes after discussions between us and israeli officials in recent days, including talks us president joe biden had with

israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu . the us says it will netanyahu. the us says it will allow people to get out of harm's way and for deliveries of humanitarian aid . the supreme humanitarian aid. the supreme court is set to give its decision on whether a government plan to deport asylum seekers to rwanda is lawful. the court of appeal ruled in june the plan to deport those seeking asylum to the east african nation was unlawful , the east african nation was unlawful, while the east african nation was unlawful , while the the east african nation was unlawful, while the home office challenged that ruling last month. the decision on the challenge is expected to be made on wednesday , and the queen has on wednesday, and the queen has commemorated the nation's war dead at a ceremony at westminster abbey field of remembrance. camilla paid tribute and recognised the sacrifice faces of those who fought and died for their country. in her first visit to the abbey since the coronation after placing the cross down, camilla and hundreds of veterans fell silent as the chimes of big ben rang out . this is gb news ben rang out. this is gb news across the uk on tv in your car, on your digital radio, and on your smart speaker by saying play gb news now it's back to

headliners . headliners. >> hello and welcome to headliners. your first look at friday's newspaper covers. i'm stephen allen and helping me on this journey of emotional discovery . we have top comedians discovery. we have top comedians paul and cressida wetton. paul cox and cressida wetton. cox and wetton. nope, no jokes. i can think of there. so we can just move on. how are you doing? >> both great. steve how are you? >> chris i'm very well. i've had a i've been hanging a lovely day. i've been hanging out you okay? out with my dad. are you okay? >> talking of dads. >> very nice. talking of dads. you've dad, haven't you? >> very nice. talking of dads. yhave dad, haven't you? >> very nice. talking of dads. yhave . dad, haven't you? ihave. >> that's true. >> that's true. >> he speaks of you, actually. >> really? yeah. this relationship is really going faster i've faster than i expected. i've started the parents started to meet the parents already.got two dads now . >> i've got two dads now. >> i've got two dads now. >> well, that is it. oh, hang on. i'm slightly older than you . on. i'm slightly older than you. like three years older. how it works, is it not? >> i thought it was a louis joke, and it just took me a no, no, no, no. my dad, my dad had.

>> steve has met steve. wow >> steve has met steve. wow >> calling me >> if you start calling me daddy, this show going to get daddy, this show is going to get weird. i'm saying. weird. that's all i'm saying. all right. let's on all right. let's move on to those front the daily those front pages. the daily mail for and you mail come for suella and you come for us all. is there front page the guardian pressure grows on sunak to sack braverman over clash with police. the telegraph goes with sunak faces calls to sack braverman. the i sack me if you dare. braverman defies pm's authority. let's see if there's authority. let's see if there's a pattern. the daily express suella future teeters on the bnnk suella future teeters on the brink and daily star normally. there you go with something else. nope. we asked 100 people who was the most bat bleep crazy home secretary we've ever seen in our survey said no. actually, we don't know. it could be anyone, couldn't it? and those are all those are front pages . are all those are front pages. let's get stuck in. let's begin with the daily mail. paul >> yes, the daily mail. steve, come for suella and you come for

us all. thinks you speak for us all. there don't they? don't they? the daily mail. so this is rishi sunak was last night warned for a mutiny on the tory right? if they sack suella braverman. so this comes on the back of an article that she wrote today in the times in which criticised the police, which she criticised the police, saying that they favourites saying that they had favourites but some but not without some justification. i would say. i mean there has been demonstrable evidence online where they've essentially there have been people british flags, people with british flags, they've them they've been asked to take them down and they've down by the police and they've pointed what about pointed out, well, what about those over those thousand people over there? there's those thousand people over tibit ? there's those thousand people over tibit too there's those thousand people over tibit too many there's those thousand people over tibit too many of there's those thousand people over tibit too many of them. there's those thousand people over tibit too many of them. so lere's those thousand people over tibit too many of them. so we're a bit too many of them. so we're going you to do it, if going to ask you to do it, if you don't mind. and i think that's she's you don't mind. and i think that's to. she's you don't mind. and i think that's to. but she's you don't mind. and i think that's to. but the she's you don't mind. and i think that's to. but the bigger talking to. but the bigger picture that suella picture here is that suella braverman is probably be one of the conservatives in the the few conservatives in the conservative party now, and she speaks from a conservative perspective. she's always doing this. this is not out of character. this isn't this isn't someone who is surprising us at all. and people are jumping all overit all. and people are jumping all over it , all. and people are jumping all over it, which is surprising me slightly because it's not out of character. the one thing she may have done wrong is that she i

think the story for parliamentary rules has run past the prime minister's office. he didn't he didn't agree the original wording, but the original wording, but the original wording, but the original wording got published . original wording got published. >> yeah. and also, krista, how about this as a just to throw some balance and all of this in here, if you are, i don't know, in charge of the police home secretary, for example, and you've some beef with the you've got some beef with the police, you very much can pick up phone the police up the phone and tell the police about writing about it rather than writing about it rather than writing about national newspaper. >> that's the best bit. that's newspaper. >> favouritea best bit. that's newspaper. >> favourite bitzst bit. that's newspaper. >> favourite bit of bit. that's newspaper. >> favourite bit of the that's newspaper. >> favourite bit of the whole my favourite bit of the whole story, rogue . story, that she's gone rogue. and i think is going to and i think this is going to this going do great things this is going to do great things for the long term. for her in the long term. >> everyone's the other thing, of course, is mean, of course, is i mean, it's rishi, here's upset, but rishi is upset all. this is is not upset at all. this is this would like be this rishi would like to be rishi to the rishi would like to have the trousers to be able say this trousers to be able to say this sort about police sort of thing about the police because he essentially tried yesterday yeah, do yesterday by saying, yeah, do what like, goes what you like, but if it goes wrong, you. was wrong, it's on you. that was that was. that the same as that was. that was the same as what she's saying, she what she's saying, except she was more and, and was just more pointed and, and probably more accurate. >> do you think she is trying to get fired? loads of newspapers

are that, are kind of hinting at that, that somehow she it would play in the long run, as you say, chris skudder temporarily fired just massive legend. >> she got andrew tate. is that the temporary idea come back to a well, don't a massive legend? well, i don't know bring out i mean, ijust know to bring out i mean, i just saw that clip on the news. sadiq khan everything her, khan blaming everything on her, saying her her behaviour. she needs to think about she's needs to think about what she's done. is causing done. her behaviour is causing what did he call it? division between us. really. is it is it suella that we should be blaming for that? i mean he says that in the same sentence saying that the same sentence as saying that everybody come on everybody is going to come on sunday the other side is sunday from the other side is edl . edl. >> e sowing some e sowlitg some more division. >> well, of course he is. >> well, of course he is. >> but what about collective responsibility, though? you >> but what about collective resjsuch)ility, though? you >> but what about collective resjsuch a ity, though? you >> but what about collective resjsuch a high,iough? you >> but what about collective resjsuch a high, high? you >> but what about collective resjsuch a high, high up you >> but what about collective resjsuch a high, high up the] are such a high, high up the rank sector of state, you should be seeing it from the same hymn sheet. you're causing division in government. you're making rishi sunak weak . and rishi sunak look weak. and that's to necessarily that's not going to necessarily win . win votes. >> yes. no, i agree. i do agree on that point. i think there is no cohesion and there probably should be lot it's

should be a lot more. it's always going to be that sort of tension between government and police, particularly in these situations when both can get the blame. and there's some posturing at the moment and some manoeuvring to make sure that if it does go slightly on it does go slightly wrong on sunday and saturday, let's hope it doesn't. does, then it doesn't. but if it does, then government to just government are going to just turn and say, told turn round and say, we told you so, reasonable . so, so reasonable. >> paul but it'll >> paul well, no, but it'll never catch on, so let's move on to the guardian. >> what have they gone with? >> what have they gone with? >> cressida they've got braverman as obviously. braverman as well, obviously. they've got ceasefire they've also got ceasefire deal to free hostages was rejected by israeli pm. so the guardian is saying that some time before much closer to the 7th of october, for there was already an offer from hamas to release some hostages. we don't know how many. and that's the crucial thing for a ceasefire. and netanyahu turned it down, but we don't know how many. so there was 240 people taken. if he's gone, gone, then we'll give you a people. it's not a couple of people. it's not fair, is it? so information fair, is it? so that information isn't in this article . isn't in this article. >> such a huge story

>> it's also such a huge story that they shouldn't say things like, according to close, according sourcesfamiliar according to sources familiar with the negotiations . as that's with the negotiations. as that's the sort of line you expect when they're talking about jordan or sam fox. is this is this is sam fox. this is this is this is not gaza is, you know, gaza , not gaza is, you know, gaza, israel. i think this is pure speculation from the guardian. i think they've taken they've taken a potentially valid piece of journalism. and spun it for what they want . i mean, what they want. i mean, netanyahu. netanyahu is not the most liked man, even amongst the jewish people. but i can't believe that let's say the hamas were going to offer all all hostages back. i can't believe he turned that down. >> well , he turned that down. >> well, we're he turned that down. >> well , we're nowhere near >> well, we're nowhere near that. they're now talking about releasing children releasing the women and children . and it turns there's . and it turns out there's israeli people campaigning outside front door , outside his front door, apparently for get apparently for him to get involved in the negotiations. i thought idea was bring thought the idea was bring everyone home. no one forgotten. but i don't know. >> and i suppose this is in contrast to the news that we hear about this for our or whatever the phrase is . that's

whatever the phrase is. that's not ceasefire. this ceasing of firing temporarily for four hours. but it's because the americans got involved. and for all of the mps in this country saying, oh, no, it's keir starmer must say this wouldn't made what he says, made a difference what he says, it difference what it makes a difference what america absolutely >> well, that's absolutely right, it? mean, i think right, isn't it? i mean, i think the humanitarian break, the for our humanitarian break, that's the is, is good. that's the phrase is, is good. i mean, how can you say anything else ? it's not a ceasefire, of else? it's not a ceasefire, of course, but it's allowing humanitarian, humanitarian , humanitarian, humanitarian, humanitarian, humanitarian, humanitarian aid into gaza, which as we can see, is much needed no matter what side you fall down on or whether you're in the middle or whatever, you know, that they need get aid know, that they need to get aid in a good thing in there. so that's a good thing .then in there. so that's a good thing . then we'll just see where that goes. this none of this looks good to me. >> yeah, i'm sure we'll come back to this story at some point. moving on to the telegraph, paul. >> covid vaccine >> yes, a covid vaccine compensation scheme must be reformed . and former ministers reformed. and former ministers urged this is nadhim zahawi and sir jeremy wright urging the government to examine payments over delays and limited support

for people harmed by covid vaccines . this is families vaccines. this is families affected by covid vaccine forced to take legal action because because of limited sums awarded by official compensation schemes and whilst this is on the front page of the telegraph and there's a lot going on in the world at the moment, i would say this a very big story because this is a very big story because we've the covid inquiry we've got the covid inquiry going and don't think the going on and i don't think the covid has got the right covid inquiry has got the right line of attack at all and we'll come later. but come to that a bit later. but this is one of the this is one value add really come from value add can really come from the aftermath of covid to suggest for instance , suggest that, for instance, covid vaccines were good for everybody is nonsense. we all know that. that before know that. we knew that before we because there we were going in because there was was element was a there was an element of risk whether you were risk to it all. whether you were for vaccines , for vaccines against vaccines, you knew that. >> we knew that was true of vaccines. yes. before covid was even a thing. >> so i wish you open try a small amount of a vaccine first, don't you? >> you don't say, let's give this population this to the entire population at an to taxpayer an enormous cost to the taxpayer and it goes. you know,

and see how it goes. you know, you'd think should have you'd i think they should have begun vulnerable begun with really vulnerable people. i mean very people. and by that i mean very old where old or very sick people where maybe done some maybe it could have done some some good and not rolling it out to children as quickly as they possibly could. completely unnecessary. >> they took away >> exactly. and they took away autonomy to some so they >> exactly. and they took away aut say, ny to some so they >> exactly. and they took away aut say, no,o some so they >> exactly. and they took away aut say, no, we»me so they >> exactly. and they took away aut say, no, we gave so they >> exactly. and they took away aut say, no, we gave everyone they all say, no, we gave everyone a choice, felt choice, but nobody really felt like had a choice, because like they had a choice, because at if we can cast our at that time, if we can cast our minds back i've forgotten minds back and i've forgotten a lot be honest, three lot of it, to be honest, three years now, but at that years ago now, but at that moment in time, felt you moment in time, you felt a you felt wanted the vaccine felt like you wanted the vaccine because that was my because i, i did. that was my personal because personal perspective, because i thought this might be the way out if you out of this. and b, if you didn't it, you felt like didn't have it, you felt like you going to restricted you were going to be restricted from a whole of things from a whole raft of things going eating going forward. holidays, eating out , going to going forward. holidays, eating out, going to whatever out, going to the pub, whatever it might be. so this was forced upon large amounts of the population and therefore we should probably look at a great deal of compensation if people were injured . were injured. >> it does come >> and yeah, and it does come down to the amount of money because it's enough, it? because it's not enough, is it? i have a vaccine i mean, if you have a vaccine that some huge amount of that does some huge amount of good an if before good and that's an if before everyone tweeting and everyone starts tweeting and you have a vaccine that causes three

people to have the kind of injuries , that means they can't injuries, that means they can't work. pay the work. you've got to pay the money corrects that damage money that corrects that damage and should be part and that's that should be part of , you the cost of realising, you know, the cost benefit analysis . benefit analysis. >> but presumably this is the tip because tip of the iceberg because so many if it hurts a few many i mean, if it hurts a few people, the scale of this means that it's just going to cost . that it's just going to cost. >> well, that's, that's why i think such story think this is such a big story because it's been hidden for political optical reasons. >> well , let's political optical reasons. >> well, let's end this section with the daily star. consider what's their take back to suella. >> we asked 100 people who was the most backed austerity crazy home secretary we've ever seen. our survey said no, but i've only got the front page , so it's only got the front page, so it's difficult to tell the picture. >> dennis, dennis, home secretary i mean, look , there's secretary i mean, look, there's theresa may. >> there's priti patel who was giving evidence at the covid inquiry. and what's really interesting about that is one of the things that priti patel said was the home secretary is

was that the home secretary is not in charge of telling the police where to police and who to arrest . so that's an awkward to arrest. so that's an awkward thing to say right now. oh, well , hated that. >> i bet she did. >> i bet she did. >> yeah. i mean, but it drove her crazy. and going back to that story, that's why there is this conflict between the mayor that story, that's why there is thilondon ct between the mayor that story, that's why there is thilondon andetween the mayor that story, that's why there is thilondon and the en the mayor that story, that's why there is thilondon and the centralviayor of london and the central government mayor of government, because the mayor of london jurisdic ation london does have jurisdic ation over police, over the metropolitan police, which which is the police force that are going to be managing whatever happens over the weekend. i think this is weekend. i don't i think this is slightly unfair on suella. i just it's very easy just think it's very easy pickings to say back crazy. >> we're thinking of saying guano instead of bat . guano instead of bat. >> yeah, yeah. i don't know what a very nearly said it then . a very nearly said it then. >> and no, crazy is a good phrase as well. guano crazy man. >> yeah. guano crazy . now. now >> yeah. guano crazy. now. now i feel like i apologise for that . feel like i apologise for that. >> you never know. it might be on the list. we'll check in the break, that's part break, but that's it for part one. two, we are talking one. in part two, we are talking no fault evictions and boris johnson. but no, not the same johnson. but no, not in the same story . we

time, you've got to accept there are quite a lot of people who go

to a&e who don't go in their hour of need. >> this is also very true. and . >> this is also very true. and. welcome back to headliners . welcome back to headliners. >> we're in part two and suella hasn't been sacked yet. if you're watching the repeat, we don't know. we're still here with paul cox and cressida wetton to the independent paul. and it seems boris johnson wanted bigger fines for breaking lockdown which would have lockdown rules, which would have one whichever party one day cost whichever party donor he got to pay his. yeah exactly. >> boris johnson wanted bigger fines for covid rule breakers inquiry reveal. so this is boris johnson, the famous do you remember boris , don't you? oh, remember boris, don't you? oh, yeah. colleague our colleague. >> oh, that's true. yeah, he's not forgotten. >> yeah . so, boris , he wanted >> yeah. so, boris, he wanted higher fines for covid rule breakers as he unwound the first lockdown back in august 2020. just weeks after his own rule breaking . and there was a breaking. and there was a fascinating piece in here from

the lead counsel of the inquiry, which is hugo keith. casey asked former home secretary dame priti patel to put aside the crushing irony of mrjohnson's note. so i mean, i'm not sure it doesn't sound very professional of me. he sounded like he's added his own emotion on the own emotion on into the proceedings, which i think lends itself to what about to say itself to what i'm about to say because this i think because i think this i think this this inquiry is on a on a path getting us absolutely path to getting us absolutely nowhere. mean, this stuff , i nowhere. i mean, this stuff, i guess, important , but guess, is vaguely important, but i don't care. i don't think ultimately history cares whether the fines were higher or lower or took place or whether boris had cake or at a party. now i know that upsets a lot of people to say that, but genuinely to say that, but i genuinely don't that . what i do don't care about that. what i do care about getting some value care is about getting some value out particular inquiry out of this particular inquiry because an opportunity because we've got an opportunity now we're enough now whilst we're close enough to it time look at what we it in time to look at what we could done better, the could have done better, and the first look at, first thing we should look at, the should ask the first question we should ask is lockdowns work? and that is do lockdowns work? and that doesn't have doesn't seem that seems to have been around every turn been skirted around every turn at moment. and it's just not

at the moment. and it's just not happening. so this story for me in the independent is kind of not independent of thought . and not independent of thought. and it's just opportunity to have not independent of thought. and it digist opportunity to have not independent of thought. and it dig at opportunity to have not independent of thought. and it dig at boris. )ortunity to have not independent of thought. and it dig at boris. )ortu we to have not independent of thought. and it dig at boris. )ortu we already�* a dig at boris. and we already knew boris was a bit a wally. knew boris was a bit of a wally. sorry, mate . sorry, mate. >> yeah. he really >> well, yeah. did he really want he just fancy it want them? did he just fancy it that morning they that morning when they asked him? the trolley ? him? i don't know, the trolley? you earlier that you'd you said earlier that you'd already forgotten things that were going on. i think this is all smoke and it's all filibuster. so that we don't get exactly as you do exactly as you said. do lockdowns work? and every other day do a story day on headlines, we do a story about problem that about some other problem that happened about some other problem that hapandzd about some other problem that hapand ii think it matters >> and i don't think it matters whether you believe or don't believe lockdowns. believe in lockdowns. the lockdown method . lockdown was our only method. and until got the vaccine to and until we got the vaccine to manage this, now, did we need to because was massive because there was a massive economical and mental health impact of the lockdowns. impact because of the lockdowns. did work ? didn't it work? if did it work? didn't it work? if there's evidence that it kind of worked, maybe we'd do it worked, then maybe we'd do it again. not in my lifetime, but maybe know, maybe we would. but, you know, there are arguments that maybe we taken path we wouldn't have taken that path if china did, if that wasn't what china did, because want to seem because you don't want to seem to not copying the place

to be not copying the place that did there are arguments about do >> there are arguments about do it shorter and it quicker, but but shorter and you're right, of these you're right, none of these questions it's questions have been asked. it's all boris do? all about what did boris do? what's like? does what's he like? what does dominic swear dominic cummings which swear word also the word was that. oh, but also the flip side would be it's like a five part inquiry. and this is part two or something. the part two or something. by the time to episode five, time they get to episode five, miami beach , they'll they'll miami beach, they'll they'll have run out of covid wives accidentally asked good questions because they'll have run out of questions to ask. >> i hope so. >> i hope so. >> you know, you never >> i hope so. >> the you know, you never >> i hope so. >> the mirroriow, you never >> i hope so. >> the mirror ,)w, you never >> i hope so. >> the mirror , cressidaiever >> i hope so. >> the mirror , cressida and know the mirror, cressida and this story has the police , the this story has the police, the poppy this story has the police, the poppy and rishi in it, but it's not the you're thinking. not the one you're thinking. >> find no evidence poppy >> cops find no evidence poppy seller attacked by seller was attacked by protesters despite rishi sunak blast. protesters despite rishi sunak blast . so it turns out, blast. so it turns out, according to the police, the chap who claims he was punched when he was selling poppies, they don't say he wasn't punched. they say there is insufficient evidence. so no, i don't know. it doesn't seem like something he would be lying about. but i don't know him personally. so chief constable . personally. so chief constable. sorry. assistant chief constable

sean o'callaghan said. extensive review of cctv footage and the identification of key witnesses found no reason to believe that poppy found no reason to believe that poppy sellers are at any risk of being intentionally targeted . being intentionally targeted. that's a weird way of phrasing it, isn't it? >> yeah, i think it's also it's also nonsense. it's the sort of thing you'd expect from the mirror moment. one thing mirror at the moment. one thing i say is there's huge i would say is there's a huge difference between no evidence, i would say is there's a huge differeit:e between no evidence, i would say is there's a huge differeit saystween no evidence, i would say is there's a huge differeit says inzen no evidence, i would say is there's a huge differeit says inzen iheadline ce, which it says in the headline and insufficient evidence . and insufficient evidence. there's a massive gap between those two things. i could believe there was insufficient evidence. there was quite the melee. it was a big crowd. it was waverley station, was in waverley station, edinburgh, all three of us edinburgh, which all three of us all quite well. all know quite well. >> worried about some >> i'm a bit worried about some of as well. of these witnesses as well. i mean, a chance they mean, there's a chance they might on his side. might not be on his side. >> well, there's good >> well, well, there's a good point, chris, every point, chris, because every every other every single person there, other than person helped than the one person that helped him a member of him out, which was a member of station staff, was part of the protest. and it's not in there interest. >> they did review cctv . yes, >> they did review cctv. yes, but we don't know if there was a good view of reading the whole article. it would be nice to

know that. but they they checked the footage page through all that period and not see it that period and did not see it happen on the cctv now. >> and i can't see it happen ehhen >> and i can't see it happen either. in footage . one either. in that footage. one thing say is it was thing i would say is it was intimidating for him. he was a poppy intimidating for him. he was a poppy seller and it's not the best to be as a poppy best thing to be as a poppy seller middle of seller in the middle of a pro—palestine protest. that's just fact . at the two, the two just fact. at the two, the two worlds do collide and clash. there hence why we've got concerns about this weekend. but it intimidating for him. and it was intimidating for him. and he is there he is there all the time. this guy goes there and he leaves at 3 pm. every day. this was 230 in the was at two, 230 in the afternoon. and he felt like he had leave. said had to leave. they said that someone said someone someone he said that someone trod stuff. he's an 80 trod on his stuff. he's an 80 year old. 78 year old man. i think we have reason to think he has we have reason to believe whether it was believe him. whether it was a punchin believe him. whether it was a punch in face is another punch in the face is another matter . m atter. >> matter. >> okay. m atter. » okay. >> okay. let's move on to the times . paul and the the times. paul and the bbc, the state propaganda outlet, has done propaganda outlets done what propaganda outlets always do and admitted it, got it wrong and apologised . can't it wrong and apologised. can't be right. >> yeah. always after the fact as isn't it? rather

as well, isn't it? rather than trying in the trying to get it right in the first easily done. first place. very easily done. be be. i can't say it. bbc admits to british. >> i believe it's pronounced that way. yeah. the bbc. baa! baa baa! baa >> but buzzer anyway, apparently it's pronounced lightning rod. yeah. bbc admits to two british jews. just the british jews. it was. it made mistakes in israel, gaza, gaza coverage . so this is gaza, gaza coverage. so this is the bbc admitting mistakes in its coverage of the war between israel and hamas but denied accusing asians of systematic systematic anti semitism, which i find really interesting statement because it's not saying it's not saying it wasn't anti—semitic. it'sjust saying it's not saying it wasn't anti—semitic. it's just saying it's not built into their system to be anti—semitic. and of course , as there is no confusion course, as there is no confusion here, because if we just have to take ourselves back to the 7th of october, we all saw the scenes. we all saw there was rape, murder and pillage. and we all knew that it was done by hamas . so then to just spend the hamas. so then to just spend the next three weeks calling hamas activist it's friendly activist, it's like friendly union know why they

union leaders know why they don't the word terrorist . don't use the word terrorist. but i do. >> you can disagree with that decision. but that they decision. but you know that they didn't have didn't say, let's have a meeting. we take a vote meeting. should we take a vote on should these on it? should we call these terrorists? decided, terrorists? we've decided, no, let's and let's not do it. that's and that's the narrative that's been sold aren't they sold like, why aren't they calling these people, the terrorists because made calling these people, the te stupid. because made calling these people, the te stupid decision se made calling these people, the te stupid decision to made calling these people, the testupid decision to call made calling these people, the testupid decision to call no.nade a stupid decision to call no. one terrorists. >> yes . and that is an important >> yes. and that is an important point, steve. absolutely. because that has got lost in the argument and it's got lost with me you know, i've me sometimes. you know, i've been critical of the bbc been very critical of the bbc over this particular thing , and over this particular thing, and i've that. and i've never mentioned that. and until today, i wasn't actually aware of that process. however it did take a long time. it did take long. >> and the other thing they've agreed is fact checking, agreed on is fact checking, isn't it? that up isn't it? and that comes up again mistake. the again in here. the mistake. the mistake about. and mistake we all know about. and they've this has they've said that this has all brought a change. brought about a change. we've started to write headlines by putting making putting who is making a particular claim first, but this comes how much longer since they when did they start doing their fact checking campaign? that's months ago, isn't it though? >> well, the verify thing was a month ago. before that, there

was the misinformation reporter, which is kind the sort which is kind of the same sort of thing i of deal. the one thing i did hear saying it's hear someone saying that it's because in time because we now live in a time when most people get their news from push notifications. so actually, you don't write actually, if you don't write that headline, headline was that headline, the headline was the write the the afterthought. you write the article headline. article and then the headline. and you that wrong, and if you get that wrong, you've a mistake you've really made a mistake these where these days because that's where people so people get their news from. so that's they're really that's where they're really dropping well . dropping the ball as well. >> like news >> yeah, and it's like news isn't news isn't a commodity to sell, particularly when it's when it's this. i mean, arguably it is , by the way, by the way, it is, by the way, by the way, in the room. yeah hang about. this is my job. okay but i think what i'm trying to say is, particularly with israel , gaza, particularly with israel, gaza, they they can spend time getting it right . that they they can spend time getting it right. that push they they can spend time getting it right . that push message it right. that push message doesn't have to be catchy. >> yeah, good point . the >> yeah, good point. the independent crusader , we have no independent crusader, we have no fault divorces , but we get a ban fault divorces, but we get a ban on no fault evictions. so if you want to get rid of a tenant, best bet. marry them . best bet. marry them. >> smart, nice, smart . no fault >> smart, nice, smart. no fault evictions hit seven year high amid government delays to ban.

so i'm not sure if we are getting this or not. it's all everything to play for the number of landlords. so it's gone up a lot. the number of landlords pursuing no fault evictions their tenants evictions against their tenants is at its highest for seven years. figures show . so years. new figures show. so there's been more than 8300 section 21 evictions known as no fault evictions because the landlord doesn't have to give a specific reason and that's from july to september this year, which is a massive increase . on which is a massive increase. on last year, it's up 37.9. is this cost of living crisis causing people to bring their properties back from the market? i don't know . and this week the kings know. and this week the kings speech has included some stuff and obviously , you know, the and obviously, you know, the king knows loads about landlord and tenant law, doesn't he? that's that's a person want that's that's a person you want to about that. but to go to hear about that. but anyway, it's not going to be brought yet. and the king is brought in yet. and the king is still talking about landlords will from reforms to will benefit from reforms to provide certainty that they can regain properties when regain their properties when needed. the one hand, needed. so on the one hand, you've saying you've got people saying we can't thrown on

can't have people thrown out on the the other the streets and on the other hand, well, we hand, people saying, well, we can't being can't just have landlords being forced to give up their properties. going properties. what's going to happen ? happen? >> there's probably a very >> well, there's probably a very good happening good reason why it's happening right now, because they fear it's in. not it's going to come in. it's not illegal now. so illegal to do it right now. so they're if they they're thinking if they get rid of get rid people of if they get rid of people now, they can now, then, you know, they can they their their they can increase their their rents get rid of rents and they can get rid of difficult before difficult people. now, before it becomes get rid of becomes impossible to get rid of difficult people, because we often forget when we're having this that , you know, this debate that, you know, there are landlords exist in this argument also. and we even need accept that we don't need to accept that we don't have any public renting, private renting , sorry, or we just renting, sorry, or we just accept that landlords own property and pretty much they can do as they wish that can do as they wish with that within the rules. now i know that and that seems terribly unfair and a bit of me to say, bit dickensian of me to say, well, you know, let's get rid of the surplus poor or whatever. it's what i'm saying. what the surplus poor or whatever. it's saying at i'm saying. what the surplus poor or whatever. it's saying is i'm saying. what the surplus poor or whatever. it's saying is it's saying. what the surplus poor or whatever. it's saying is it's going|. what the surplus poor or whatever. it's saying is it's going int01at i'm saying is it's going into politics. yeah, no, not politics. yeah, yeah. no, not i'm. suella braverman i'm. i'm suella braverman speechwriter, but , but, but speechwriter, but, but, but i would say there are two sides to this and they're not doing anything illegal right now. and it is unfair. but do you know

what? risking it is very risky. it's a very risky move to rent privately. it is . privately. it is. >> oh, the interest rates going up. yeah. i guess it really changes things. >> you've still a contract, >> you've still got a contract, though, i can't though, haven't you? so i can't really understand why if everyone's within everyone's acting within the rules contract, rules of the contract, but nothing's this. rules of the contract, but not that's this. rules of the contract, but not that's the this. rules of the contract, but not that's the point. his. rules of the contract, but not that's the point. at. rules of the contract, but not that's the point. at the >> that's the point. at the moment i think that's why they're doing before it they're doing it now before it becomes should do? they're doing it now before it bec let's should do? they're doing it now before it bec let's try should do? they're doing it now before it beclet's try and should do? they're doing it now before it beclet's try and d01ould do? they're doing it now before it beclet's try and do auld do? they're doing it now before it beclet's try and do a quick do? they're doing it now before it beclet's try and do a quick hit�* >> let's try and do a quick hit on it won't take on this one. maybe it won't take long, telegraph, long, but to the telegraph, paul and concert, and at a beyonce concert, cameras were trained on paedophiles. so much like cameras were trained on pa

opposite argument is, you actually want paedophiles in pop concerts . and i don't. so concerts. and i don't. so i think this is a good thing. >> it's the opposite. >> it's the opposite. >> it's the opposite. >> i can't imagine beyonce in south wales. i think that's brilliant . i south wales. i think that's brilliant. i wonder south wales. i think that's brilliant . i wonder how she brilliant. i wonder how she feels about this branding . like. feels about this branding. like. >> well, she probably didn't know, she ? thought was know, did she? i thought it was a request . probably. can have a request. probably. can i have peeled strawberries and no paedophiles? wouldn't paedophiles? i just wouldn't want be associated with it . want to be associated with it. >> well, that's for part >> well, that's it. for part two. coming up, we'll be talking about the king, the pope and ofcom. so we'll definitely be respectful about at least one of those. we'll see

to accept there are quite a lot of people who go to a&e who don't go in their hour of need. this is also very true. and . this is also very true. and. welcome back to headliners to the telegraph, cressida and someone's been praising migration but he would he comes from a long line of germans is the king is the king >> the king says refugees need to feel more welcome in. i can't do this in britain. >> it wasn't bad .

>> it wasn't bad. >> it wasn't bad. >> thank you. it's mainly me doing an impression of eddie izzard anyway , as we've izzard doing it anyway, as we've established, king established, the king is an expert in landlord and tenant law also he's an expert law and he's also he's an expert in refugees as well. so he's hosted humanitarian charities hosted a humanitarian charities do the palace . and that's his do at the palace. and that's his this is his his takeaway pitch is refugees need to feel more welcome and he's he's got these ideas that that they could contribute to society city. he's been talking to michael palin about this michael palin says he's travelled the world a lot. i've travelled the world a lot. i've travelled the world a lot. isuppose i've travelled the world a lot. i suppose the refugees have as well, they've well, haven't they? they've all they've to talk about. they've got lots to talk about. i mean . will be i mean. yeah. will they be staying the palace? obviously staying at the palace? obviously that's what we will know that's what we will want to know . absolutely. that's what we will want to know . abso not ly. that's what we will want to know . abso not getting that's what we will want to know . absonot getting then. that's what we will want to know . know, onot getting then. that's what we will want to know . know, onohateting then. that's what we will want to know . know,onohatetin1say then. you know, i'd hate to say anything his majesty. so anything against his majesty. so i know he watches . so sorry, anything against his majesty. so i kr but he watches . so sorry, anything against his majesty. so i krbut .e watches . so sorry, anything against his majesty. so i krbut . butitches . so sorry, anything against his majesty. so i krbut . but i:hes . so sorry, anything against his majesty. so i krbut . but i think so sorry, anything against his majesty. so i krbut . but i think he'sorry, anything against his majesty. so i krbut . but i think he's kind sir, but. but i think he's kind of wrong on this in the sense that we are one of the most welcoming the welcoming countries in the world. we ourselves up world. we. we beat ourselves up about time. now about this all the time. now now, if you're a fighting age man, you come across on a rubber dinghy . you're probably not dinghy. you're probably not going to the sort welcome going to get the sort of welcome that would like, like

that the king would like, like us all to give these people . but us all to give these people. but however , for anyone else who however, for anyone else who comes over here seeking asylum and wants to work and wants to integrate and wants to become part of our nation and our the community that is britain , i community that is britain, i think we're very welcoming and i think we're very welcoming and i think most of us are open to it. some people, some people aren't. but you know, that's the same everywhere. i get a little everywhere. also i get a little bit balance . bit of balance. >> he was at a do about a refugee charity. he's not going to go. i'll tell you what, i reckon they should not suella is he suella would she'd turn up and say, what she thought. yeah, maybe the guardian. paul and trans people can be splashed with water. so we know that they're not witches. is there any other info in this story? >> there is more info . i'll >> there is some more info. i'll give you now. this give it to you now. so this is in the guardian and the guardian, the way, are guardian, who by the way, are the who don't the only newspaper who don't have the front page. have a poppy on the front page. i'm just going point i'm just going to point that out. trans can out. trans people can be bapfised out. trans people can be baptised be baptised in church and be godparents , says vatican. so godparents, says vatican. so this is the vatican office is adding that there must be no

situations in which there is a risk of generating a public scandal . so this is something scandal. so this is something that's been signed off by pope francis and was published on wednesday. and it says that a transgender person, even if they have undergone hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery, can receive baptism under the conditions as is other faithful. so at this stage, i find i think that we're actually starting to invent things to argue about because i've never at any point heard the i don't want trans people to be baptised argument. >> well, i'm glad you said that, because i naively thought, oh, i didn't know this was a problem. i because i thought, i assumed because i thought, well, everyone's got soul, well, everyone's got a soul, haven't you're if haven't they? if you're if you're religious. i didn't i really genuinely realise . really genuinely didn't realise. and tone of it, it's and also the tone of it, it's like, you know, when someone says, i really love that my says, oh, i really love that my kids, they're my world, you know, you did know, i just assumed you did until started insisting until you started insisting suspicious. know, like suspicious. you know, it's like that, it says the that, isn't it? it says the document also noted there document also noted that there was reason transgender people was no reason transgender people could as witnesses at could not serve as witnesses at church weddings. i should think

so, too . why would they not be so, too. why would they not be able to do that ? able to do that? >> yeah, it's like mean next week is was he going to say transgender are allowed transgender people are allowed shoelaces? i mean, none shoelaces? exactly i mean, none of this makes any real sense other than strange. i don't the story doesn't say what triggered it . story doesn't say what triggered it. have idea story doesn't say what triggered it . have idea why anybody it. i have no idea why anybody would argue against it. >> you find out on twitter later. yes >> this is as usual with these religious institutions. they kind of the numbers are dropping. so they do these kind of crazy moves to try and make them go up or down. but sometimes it fails because people like the fashioned stuff. >> well, of course, that's the idea religion. it's quite old idea of religion. it's quite old fashioned. some of it's thousands old to the times. >> cressida and will, ofcom keep young people social media? young people off social media? i'm tired of getting catfished by some kids pretending to be a 45 year old trucker. >> you need to be very careful. steve. media sites warned steve. social media sites warned by ofcom do more to protect by ofcom to do more to protect children , so social media apps children, so social media apps face an overhaul to protect children. we're hearing a lot about this at the moment under a

code unveiled by ofcom as the regulator connected code unveiled by ofcom as the regsuicide connected code unveiled by ofcom as the regsuicide and connected code unveiled by ofcom as the regsuicide and terrorism,ynnected code unveiled by ofcom as the regsuicide and terrorism, those ad to suicide and terrorism, those sites will be blocked in britain. well, that sounds good, doesn't it? that sounds britain. well, that sounds good, doesn'very that sounds britain. well, that sounds good, doesn'very good.that sounds britain. well, that sounds good, doesn'very good. iiat sounds britain. well, that sounds good, doesn'very good. i stillyunds britain. well, that sounds good, doesn'very good. i still don't great. very good. i still don't always understand how they're going well going to id these kids. well they never can, can they? well, i don't know. >> for instance, facebook is supposed be over 14 supposed to be for over 14 seconds, right . and there are seconds, right. and there are plenty there just plenty of under 14 on there just for my own experience, children, ihave for my own experience, children, i have not done some census, for my own experience, children, i ha'in not done some census, for my own experience, children, i ha'in caseione some census, for my own experience, children, i ha'in case anyone'sz census, for my own experience, children, i ha'in case anyone's worried. just in case anyone's worried. >> but you know, all worried that your experience. that from your experience. >> stumbled across my just >> yeah. stumbled across my just from not because from family members not because not because i'm involved in some industry that we need to worry about. industry that we need to worry about . mean, ultimately about. i mean, ultimately what's going is we've going to happen here is we've got this is very much from the perspective our generation perspective of our generation and who and older generations who never grew media as grew up with social media as part their childhood. so part of their childhood. so we're our to manage we're doing our best to manage this a in a in a way that's this in a in a in a way that's auen this in a in a in a way that's alien to us. ultimately what's going happen is the children, going to happen is the children, now subjected to social now that are subjected to social media people that media will be the people that come the best things to come up with the best things to tackle generation tackle this. but in a generation time. so my daughter at 14, she

she hasn't had too many troubles with social media. but, you know , it must affect her in some way. and if you if you're if you're very susceptible to these sorts of things, it can be extremely damaging. so it's these are to these people that are going to tell 15 years time tell us in ten, 15 years time what is we can do because what it is we can do because we're fuddy we're kind of old and fuddy duddy, we? duddy, aren't we? >> yep. can't argue with that, sadly. paul and sadly. the daily mail. paul and a website where you can a creepy website where you can video chat with strangers is shutting down. so it turns out i am free this weekend. >> oh meagle. which is something i was new to me. i don't know if it was new to you too. a meagle shuts down after 14 years. creepy website that allowed shuts down after 14 years. creep't0/ebsite that allowed shuts down after 14 years. creep'to video; that allowed shuts down after 14 years. creep'to video chat: allowed shuts down after 14 years. creep'to video chat with wed shuts down after 14 years. creep'to video chat with random users to video chat with random strangers . closes amid users to video chat with random strangers. closes amid claims it paid children with paedophiles, doesn't sound like a good thing. the site the sounds like a dating app, but worse . dating app, but worse. >> well, this is even worse than bumble or something. >> this is the point, isn't it? so the site which randomly paired you with strangers was particularly particularly popular among children during the covid lockdown. so it says it was a great way to meet new

friends and no , no, it was not. friends and no, no, it was not. i mean, like you say, the internet is not the best way to meet new friends, is it? >> it's also a bit like working on headliners, isn't it? here's two people you've got to get on with tonight. go do it. it with tonight. go and do it. it might lewis. with tonight. go and do it. it migsome lewis. with tonight. go and do it. it migsome leithem a >> some of them have got a calendar other merchandise . calendar and other merchandise. >> have thought >> yeah. who would have thought the a place where the internet was a place where creepy things would happen if you just let. >> i've >> i think i've seen it, it's like, you know, almost like a fruit where would fruit machine where you would sit spin around sit there and then spin around and there'd there. and there'd be someone there. hi. to them hi. and then you speak to them and you'd . yeah, and inevitably you'd. yeah, yeah, old guy pants. yeah, just some old guy pants. what >> yeah. it could only go that way . i'm >> yeah. it could only go that way. i'm amazed it's >> yeah. it could only go that way . i'm amazed it's lasted 40 way. i'm amazed it's lasted 40 years. no. how did it get past six months? >> well, on to the times, cressida and someone has finally, finally solved the problem of getting rid of that smell of a newborn baby. oh, if there's one thing we wanted to get rid of, dior's to hundred and £30 designer sent for babies , it's got a grown up price tag, hasn't it?

>> well, don't just say that for it. so finally , we've got a baby it. so finally, we've got a baby perfume . the marketing is perfume. the marketing is amazing. inspired by the childlike spirit of courtier, courtier, .uk . i can't speak courtier, .uk. i can't speak couture perfumer christian dior bonne etoile is scented water with notes that poetically evoke the magic of childhood . that's the magic of childhood. that's good, isn't it? do you want to smell like the magic of childhood? >> no. that seems going >> no. that seems creepy. going on . we can see the on a website. we can see the picture there . picture there. >> look at that. >> look at that. >> advert like me. >> the advert looks like me. >> the advert looks like me. >> they look terrified. she does look. been trafficked . look. she's been trafficked. >> oh, terrifying stuff. i don't know what to do with that. >> you've floored me. this gets rid of the smell of traffic. it no , it's. well, it's come on. no, it's. well, it's come on. it's. it's silly, isn't it? i wanted to bypass the inevitable orange blossom that has so long been the signature of child . i. been the signature of child. i. >> often wondered if we >> i've often wondered if we could evolve too far. and this . could evolve too far. and this. and this. and might just be and this. and this might just be you. i mean, what's the point in this ? yeah, a £230 designer

this? yeah, a £230 designer perfume for babies . perfume for babies. >> yeah, but if you've got a new baby , you can drop an extra £200 baby, you can drop an extra £200 on just smelly stuff . on just smelly stuff. >> you're doing it wrong. yeah. >> you're doing it wrong. yeah. >> yeah, they do smelly stuff for steve as well. for free. steve as well. >> they do. that's it for part three in the final section, robots attacking humans and actual female cyborg . and we're actual female cyborg. and we're all living in the matrix. is it all living in the matrix. is it all from the daily star? find out

soon welcome back to headlines us to the daily star. paul and if you weren't worried about robots ending humans as well, you will how. >> now. >> yeah i've always been worried and now i'm even more worried. so crushes factory worker so robot crushes factory worker dead after mistaking him for a box of vegetables . i'm sorry for box of vegetables. i'm sorry for laughing . it's box of vegetables. i'm sorry for laughing. it's a box of vegetables. i'm sorry for laughing . it's a very serious laughing. it's a very serious story. a robotic company worker has died after a machine he was

inspecting failed to differentiate between him and a box of peppers , pushing him into box of peppers, pushing him into a conveyor belt and crushing his face. so this obviously quite harrowing. and this is just further proof that science is bad. steve isn't it? this is a terrible story. this is this is somehow worse than the terminator because of how gross this is. >> this is so bad. this is. >> this is so bad . yeah. and >> this is so bad. yeah. and lewis is going to say vegetables are bad for you, which is equally annoying. yeah so sorry. i'm sorry. terrible. i i'm so sorry. it's terrible. i mean, now , haven't mean, we've started now, haven't we? it's. this is it. keep we? it's. this is it. we keep every week the ai. is it every week all the ai. is it going get us? yes going to get us? yes >> it's not very good is >> well it's not very good is it. can't differentiate it. if it can't differentiate between want to between basically what i want to know looked like to know is what he looked like to get not after . not get mixed up. not after. not after steve. absolutely not. victim blaming the crushed face, man. i'm just saying, how could he get mixed up with a box of peppers thinking he might have dressed like the dressed slightly like the t shirt was the red hot chilli peppers like peppers logo? maybe he had like a relief t shirt on with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a relief t shirt on with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a red.ief t shirt on with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a red. a: t shirt on with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a red. a redhirt on with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a red. a red ,irt on with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a red. a red , a on with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a red. a red , a red with, peppers logo? maybe he had like a a red. a red , a red nose like, a red. a red, a red nose on it. and they thought it's anotherdear. i'm oh i'm

>> oh, dear. i'm oh i'm horrified. i'm not easily horrified. i'm not easily horrified. that's to the daily mail cressida and there is an actual cyborg woman who's got a chip implanted so that one of her hands can unlock doors and her hands can unlock doors and her other hand can vibrate . and her other hand can vibrate. and if your hand can vibrate, you don't need to unlock doors. what are laughing you're are you laughing at? you're not leaving the house. >> you . it steve, meet >> i love you. it steve, meet the world's ultimate cyborg . a the world's ultimate cyborg. a california woman has 52 implants in her body that allow her to open locks and turn on computers. and steve? well one even causes her hand to vibrate. nice. we've done that part of the joke now. yeah so i'm really sexist as you know. and i would have thought the first person to have thought the first person to have 52 cyborg implants would have 52 cyborg implants would have been a bloke. yeah, this is quite an, you know, that's pretty interesting actually, quite an, you know, that's prett it?1teresting actually, quite an, you know, that's pre'she'seresting actually, quite an, you know, that's pre'she'serymagicianually, quite an, you know, that's pre'she'serymagician only, quite an, you know, that's pre'she'serymagician on some sort quite an, you know, that's pr she's. she's an anomalous. >> she's. she's an anomalous. >> she go shopping every >> she can't go shopping every time tries to walk past the time she tries to walk past the security beep. here security thing. beep, beep. here we must. i mean, says >> it must. i mean, it says something interesting here. it says implants says about half of the implants are microchips, which he programmed. seems to give herself senses and

herself heightened senses and abilities, such as opening locks and turning on computers . i and turning on computers. i mean, i have turned on a lot of computers and none of them have given me the older the older. >> do you not do the thing when i know this is a bit london centric, but when you use your oyster you oyster card during winter, you just inside glove just slip it inside your glove so you feel like iron man so you can feel like iron man when going no, when you're going through no, but will 100% be that? but will 100% be doing that? >> it's pretty cool. maybe even tonight. but you don't tonight. yeah, but you don't have to implant with 52. >> no. %- % this the 52. >> no. this the future? >> no. is this the future? >> no. is this the future? >> and worse than that, she has to she to keep checking them. so she has presumably take them out has to presumably take them out of body and they have to be of her body and they have to be checked they've checked because they've got these things on the these chemical things on the outside that, you know, it can't go wrong. but she's the pioneer , go wrong. but she's the pioneer, so it might go wrong. >> and also on this, what love >> and also on this, what i love about internet at the moment about the internet at the moment is are people is generally there are people who stuff, who say bill who hate eco stuff, who say bill gates trying to chips in who hate eco stuff, who say bill ga all trying to chips in who hate eco stuff, who say bill ga all and/ing to chips in who hate eco stuff, who say bill ga all and then 0 chips in who hate eco stuff, who say bill ga all and then literallyips in who hate eco stuff, who say bill ga all and then literally elohi us all and then literally elon musk is making electric cars and putting in people and they putting chips in people and they love a bit of him. so this whole area messy these days, area is a bit messy these days, isn't ? the daily star, paul

isn't it? the daily star, paul and are we living in a simulation and so , why did simulation and if so, why did they so that have nipples? >> that is a really good question. it's quite deep, actually. another another story from the daily star big time tonight in possible to rule out human was living in matrix style thought controlled simulation so the latest claims from google's artificial intelligence powered large language model bard states that humans might be living in a fake world where every thought is controlled . and i can believe is controlled. and i can believe that. is controlled. and i can believe that . i is controlled. and i can believe that. i mean, i think we've seen evidence of it all over the news every day of the week, don't we? people do seem to be controlled, but of course , it's not out of but of course, it's not out of the of nearly everything the realms of nearly everything is possible. can't you just is possible. you can't you just can't anything out. can't rule anything out. >> yeah. president hot take on this. >> i mean, it's nearly 20 years since i took philosophy and this is like first year i thought i'd wasted my time and all my money, but it's all come to fruition today. yeah this is. this is possible . descartes and all that. >> the argument that i hate about the idea that we're more

likely to be living in a simulation bothers then simulation bothers me. then the argument it's easier to argument goes it's easier to make a simulation than it is to make a simulation than it is to make a simulation than it is to make a universe. so if there's an amount of time, more an infinite amount of time, more simulationsbuilt. so meant and built. so statistically , we're more likely statistically, we're more likely to in a simulation. your to be in a simulation. your timesing by infinity , though. timesing by infinity, though. that's not our math. well, of coui'se. >> course. >> and you know, monkeys and shakespeare and that sort of shakespeare and all that sort of stuff. always seem stuff. what what we always seem to here. is to be doing here. there is some logic that , to be doing here. there is some logic that, but i'm not just logic to that, but i'm not just saying random words like, yeah, these things are all possible next. but you know, they're, they always seem to be arguing that can't be a god by that there can't be a god by arguing that there could be an artificial god. >> yeah, good point . star trek >> yeah, good point. star trek one in it. yeah. to the times. now cressida and speed dating for dogs not to be sniffed at how cute date my dog can i find a match for my whippet pym . a match for my whippet pym. >> oh sweet is this to start with? i like it . >> oh sweet is this to start with? i like it. i'm looking for a stud. handsome excellent pedigree with true blue leanings. >> i'm sure you are. but what about the story ?

about the story? >> not for me. you understand ? >> not for me. you understand? my >> not for me. you understand? my dog, pimlico bets derbyshire . my dog, pimlico bets derbyshire. >> ridiculous . >> ridiculous. >> ridiculous. >> and this dog is a very expensive dog. she comes from a long line of other expensive dogs. long line of other expensive dogs . she's probably all got dogs. she's probably all got terrible health problems, and so she's looking for somebody who's got a stud dog for her dog. but really, it's her partner, terence and terence has seen that there's people in other parts of the world making thousands of pounds. and this is where cute. where it all stops getting cute. really. people are just really. these people are just jumped puppy farmers who jumped up. puppy farmers who adopt don't breed. >> i mean , the dog needs to be >> i mean, the dog needs to be rescued from its owners at this point. i think dogs don't need to date . dogs aren't posh. they to date. dogs aren't posh. they just need a ruffle and a scruff. steve and a kip. no dating dogs. i mean, i like a ruffle and a scruff. i don't know if you do, steve. sounds better. yeah, you're the kip. just get. actually no dog is called pimlico derbyshire not pimlico bits. derbyshire not even ridiculous. >> no. sponsored the >> no. is it sponsored by the plumbers. yeah

>> no they'll be upset by that won't they. they they won't they. they won't, they won't they. they won't, they won't have thought of that guarantee. it >> kennel club dogs have these long names don't they. this is a whippet as well. >> like whippets. >> i like whippets. >> i like whippets. >> yeah. against >> yeah. nothing against whippets. that's not my point at all. whippet. i just all. i'm pro the whippet. i just said i wasn't suggesting you were. >> it's just we've had an argument they're >> it's just we've had an argument maths they're >> it's just we've had an argument maths in they're >> it's just we've had an argument maths in the ley're >> it's just we've had an argument maths in the third doing the maths in the third paragraph about they can paragraph about how they can make three grand out of a dog. >> , no, no. have cheap dog. >> no, no, no. have a cheap dog. i had a cheap dog. and you couldn't get any more love out. they they're you they just. they're great. you don't expensive and don't need an expensive one. and you you you get health problems if you start inbreeding . is he gone? you get health problems if you startl'mreeding . is he gone? you get health problems if you starti'm from ng . is he gone? you get health problems if you starti'm from the is he gone? you get health problems if you starti'm from the west.gone? you get health problems if you starti'm from the west. country and i'm from the west. country has oh, is this the has he gone? yes oh, is this the time? >> what did you do? >> what did you do? >> tell me. i wish i had a broken before you actually got that. still, think about that. still, just think about dead dogs . to that. still, just think about dead dogs. to the guardian. finally, paul and a tongue twister could be the new breathalyser test. well, as i always say, i'm not a pheasant plucker. i'm a pheasant plucker , plucker. i'm a pheasant plucker, son. pheasant. son. i'm only plucking pheasant. so plucker comes so so the pheasant plucker comes so it must be done. >> the drunk drivers super that

was super all the way through that. i was sweating, thinking he's is he going to never worked again? tongue twisters could be used to gauge alcohol and intoxication levels. study finds. well, i don't need to read anything else here because of course. of course. of course he doesn't. right. the only way that could work is if you tested them sober. you need a baseline . them sober. you need a baseline. you can't just wander up to people them to do tongue people and get them to do tongue twisters they're drunk, twisters if they're drunk, they might able to do might not have been able to do them were so. you'd them when they were so. so you'd just everybody in just be arresting everybody in the in the back of the van, sir. talking loads of drunk newsreaders driving around london. give him a good look. the producer here went to quite some trouble of giving us a whole bunch of tongue twisters. now i'm going to one. fred now i'm going to try one. fred fed ted bread and ted fed fred bread . bread. >> very good. >> very good. >> nice . >> nice. >> nice. >> all single syllable words there. that's what i went for. >> that's exactly what i went for it. so i'd like you to do one of the other ones, if you don't mind which got.

don't mind which one we've got. do one. do the six sick one. >> the sick six sick shakes , six >> the sick six sick shakes, six sheep sick . what? sheep sick. what? >> none of those words are written down there, chris. but congratulations for giving it go. >> let's leave another weathered wet weather. >> better for you. >> better for you. >> actually , you're right. >> actually, you're right. actually, let's just carry on until 1:00 this morning with issuing. >> we've got two minutes left to fill. >> this is like when josh tries to make a staple the documents as a race. >> and i just struggle because i haven't that thing. haven't got that sporty thing. i don't care. >> were actually reading >> so you were actually reading one that know there, one that i never know was there, but here. look. but there is one here. look. sick six sick. hicks nick six slick bricks with picks and sticks. very good. >> i slit the sheet . >> i slit the sheet. >> i slit the sheet. >> very good for. >> very good for. >> oh i'll get a badge. mrs. weapon . so, mrs. measly, thank weapon. so, mrs. measly, thank you very much . you very much. >> is that. i mean, do we. we've we've invented the breath of life. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> there is no need for this . >> there is no need for this. where is it? it's in the guardian. it's in the guardian. well, actually, we've had more

stories that make sense from the start guardian. wow. >> that's always saying something. the. yeah, but you're right. can't the right. if you can't have the ability first ability to do these in the first place, then you're never going to drive the without to drive down the street without being in being arrested. you'll be in prison all the time. you run for the though, know the police, though, and i know they're having a recruitment problem, this this problem, so this might this might people. that's problem, so this might this mighwell people. that's problem, so this might this mighwell the people. that's problem, so this might this mighwell the showople. that's problem, so this might this mighwell the show isle. that's problem, so this might this mighwell the show is nearlyt's true. well the show is nearly oven true. well the show is nearly over. let's take another look over. so let's take another look at friday's front pages of the daily come for suella a daily mail. come for suella a new come for us all. as the guardian goes with pressure grows on sunak to sack braverman over clash with police. the telegraph sunak faces calls to sack braverman. you see the pattern forming again. the i sack me if you dare. braverman defies sack me if you dare. braverman defies the pm's authority. the daily express suella as future teeters on the brink , and the teeters on the brink, and the daily star even says , we asked daily star even says, we asked 100 people who was the most at guano crazy home secretary as we've ever seen, and our survey said they probably mean suella. that's all we got time for then . that's all we got time for then. thank you to my guest, paul cox and cressida wetton. we're back tomorrow when andrew will

tomorrow at 11, when andrew will be dixon and be joined by nick dixon and bruce devlin . and if you're bruce devlin. and if you're watching the 5 am. state, the repeat stay tuned for breakfast on the way. have yourself a good one and we'll

on >> good evening. it's that woman suella again. a big article in the times today where she says the times today where she says the cops are not being even handed. >> they're being biased in terms of how they deal with protests. we'll ask, is she right? of how they deal with protests. we'll ask, is she right ? fewer we'll ask, is she right? fewer of us are wearing poppies this year and there are also fewer people out selling them. this people out selling them. is this because being bullied or because we're being bullied or is big cultural change is there a big cultural change taking place in our country ? and taking place in our country? and joining me on talking pints greg ainsworth. he was a royal marine , fought in afghanistan, went on to become a bodyguard to the beckhams. so he's got some great stories to tell. but before all of that , let's get the news with

of that, let's get the news with sophia wenzler. >> i'm sophia wenzler in the gb newsroom . labour says suella newsroom. labour says suella braverman broke the ministerial code with an article she wrote for the times today. in it, the home secretary accuses the metropolitan police of playing favourites with pro—palestinian protesters . labour's national protesters. labour's national campaign coordinator , pat campaign coordinator, pat mcfadden, says that she breached the code by failing to clear the editorial with number 10. london mayor sadiq khan says he's astonished by the article . astonished by the article. >> well i think her behaviour over the last few weeks has been behaviour that is irresponsible . behaviour that is irresponsible. all her article in the times was incorrect and inflammatory at a time when senior politicians should be bringing communities together for uniting people who have differences instead , she is have differences instead, she is stoking divisions and i worry as a consequence of her words and

her behaviour. you'll see