migration to amend the illegal migration act so that those arriving illegally can be detained and then removed in a matter of days , not months . well, meanwhile, , not months. well, meanwhile, the chancellor says the government can't guarantee rwanda deportation flights will begin next year, despite the prime minister saying he was aiming for the spring. downing street says emergency legislation will be produced in the coming weeks after the supreme court ruled that it was unlawful . to do. 12 year old unlawful. to do. 12 year old boys have been charged with the murder of a 19 year old who was stabbed to death in wolverhampton . sean c zahawi was wolverhampton. sean c zahawi was attacked on laburnum road on monday night. the boys who can't be named due to their age will appear at birmingham magistrates court tomorrow . they've also court tomorrow. they've also been charged with possession of a article up to 10 a bladed article up to 10 million gp appointments could be freed under new government plans. the new health secretary says that pharmacies will be given more powers to help people directly. me as part of an nhs

proposal to cut waiting lists from month , millions of from next month, millions of women in england will be able to access contraception access free contraception without having to see a gp. the chancellor says benefit claimants who don't seek employment despite being fit to work, will lose access to free prescriptions and legal aid. jeremy hunt says the measures are necessary to prevent, quote , are necessary to prevent, quote, anyone choosing to coast on the hard work of tax payers , end hard work of tax payers, end quote. the government crackdown will also see digital tools used to track attendance at job interviews . however, campaigners interviews. however, campaigners have described the sanctions as deeply worrying . they're warning deeply worrying. they're warning that they could worsen mental illness . and downing street has illness. and downing street has confirmed that civil servants will now need to spend more time in the office. they're required to come in to work for a bare minimum of three days a week. meanwhile more senior managers will have to be in the office for longer. it follows campaigning from former business secretary jacob rees—mogg . this secretary jacob rees—mogg. this is gb news across the uk on tv,

in your car on digital radio and on your smart speaker by saying play gb news now it's time for headliners as. >> hello and welcome to headliners. >> i'm stephen allen, helping me to sort out friday's newspapers . to sort out friday's newspapers. >> we have meat feast , louis >> we have meat feast, louis schaefer and sloppy giuseppe paul cox. >> don't judge . >> don't judge. >> don't judge. >> you've never shared a workplace toilet with him. you're both doing well . you're both doing well. >> good. >> good. >> what is a sloppy? >> what is a sloppy? >> a sloppy giuseppe it's another type of pizza which i had to search for online when i thought of calling you a meat feast, which makes , oh, a meat feast, which makes, oh, a meat feast, which makes, oh, a meat feast is a pizza. >> yeah, that's. >> yeah, that's. >> that's a disinformation. >> that's a disinformation. >> just because eat that >> just because you eat that much meat, it's not like i don't even know what pizza is anymore. no, but would never have. no, but i would never have. i wouldn't no, but i would never have. i woti dn't just eat the top of >> i would just eat the top of the i wouldn't the base. >> at some point, meat >> at some point, the meat

definitely eaten definitely would have eaten a pizza, you? pizza, wouldn't you? >> never had feast. >> i've never had a meat feast. >> i've never had a meat feast. >> pizza lived. >> pizza and lived. >> pizza and lived. >> no, because that's that's the young are having young kids are having that. >> had. >> i'm just old school we had. >> i'm just old school we had. >> do you like a sloppy giuseppe if you're offering steve, i'll take it. >> g each restaurant >> we all know each restaurant you're >> we all know each restaurant you'rwent to one in woking once, >> i went to one in woking once, but yeah. >> anyway, different story. didn't the i didn't sweat the although i do it here right. didn't sweat the although i do it hthat's ht. we're up to >> that's what we're all up to date. move on to the front date. let's move on to the front pages to the mail. pages to the daily mail. >> to block >> unelected lords plot to block rwanda that could end in rwanda law that could end in scenes like this. >> as you can see on their front page, the telegraph says braverman my plan to get rwanda flights ground. more on flights off the ground. more on that . to the guardian, that later. to the guardian, senior female staff reports sexual assault and harassment at mod the i goes with new benefits crackdown if jobless don't accept work. the times says look for a job or lose free nhs medicines and the sun. it's pc gone mad that's those are your front pages . kicking things off

front pages. kicking things off with the daily mail . with the daily mail. >> lewis good news in the daily mail. oh, not really . i >> lewis good news in the daily mail. oh, not really. i mean , mail. oh, not really. i mean, it's the same it's like it's like groundhog day in this country with new groundhog day. it's like a guy's living through to groundhog this the to groundhog days. this is the old groundhog unelected old groundhog day unelected lords rwanda law that could lords plot rwanda law that could end scenes like these. and here the scenes which is which is people in boats. is this a really big picture behind you? >> lewis? yeah, i didn't realise. >> sorry, sorry. i don't know. i don't know how television works. it's like a working class family holiday. first time tv anyway holiday. first time on tv anyway . house of lords. . hey, it's the house of lords. i understand how do i don't understand how the. i do understand house understand how the house of lords basically it's a lords works is basically it's a brake on the on the on the commoners . brake on the on the on the commoners. but it's been being power has been taken away. it can delay situations, can it not? but it can. it can't possibly stop it. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> and there's an argument about whoever's in government can kind of there are more people of pad it there are more people who can sit in that house than

could physically fit in that who can sit in that house than could because y fit in that who can sit in that house than could because y fit ikeept who can sit in that house than could because y fit ikeep just house because they keep just going, a peerage. going, oh, i have a peerage. >> there and this for >> go in there and do this for the rest of so could they block people who would vote against them? >> they can't have people them? >> at ay can't have people them? >> at the an't have people them? >> at the door have people them? >> at the door saying,3 people them? >> at the door saying,3 pe(you out at the door saying, no, you can't you're can't come in because you're going to against us. so going to vote against us. so that's going to vote against us. so tha half them just turn up >> half of them just turn up just clock in and the just to clock in and take the money and go home. >> so it's not. >> yeah, it's something to >> yeah, well, it's something to do. i'm i like do. that's why i'm here. i like to get back to to think we should get back to the story. >> what's the what? >> what's the what? >> saying >> it's actually saying the story as i can tell, is story as far as i can tell, is that people are coming and that people are coming and. and they're are. it's about rwanda, which that they which is this plan that they have ship. based an have to ship. it's based on an israeli israelis israeli plan that the israelis actually people to actually had shipped people to rwanda. how things going actually had shipped people to rwarthere?w things going actually had shipped people to rwarthere? it's things going actually had shipped people to rwarthere? it's notiings going actually had shipped people to rwarthere? it's not going oing actually had shipped people to rwarthere? it's not going well. over there? it's not going well. oh, my god, he's on fire tonight . and the idea is, is we capture people as they land in this country and take them to rwanda. yeah. and it's so uncomfortable in rwanda. they want to go anywhere but rwanda. but isn't paul anywhere but rwanda. but isn't paul, isn't that the problem, that this scheme isn't meant to

be your punished by the third party country? >> it's meant to be a more efficient way of processing . efficient way of processing. it's not meant to be the punishment of look where you'll have to wait. >> no, i think it is supposed to put people off to some degree, not because it's rwanda or whatever third party country not because it's rwanda or wh and er third party country not because it's rwanda or wh and erthink hird party country not because it's rwanda or wh and erthink hird p is y country not because it's rwanda or wh and erthink hird p is a country not because it's rwanda or whand erthink hird pis a lot ntry is, and i think there is a lot of in third party. we've of value in third party. we've noidea of value in third party. we've no idea works or not no idea if it works or not because not implemented it because we've not implemented it and very unlikely at and it looks very unlikely at this time. it is a this moment in time. it is a deterrent sense are deterrent in the sense you are coming for very coming to the uk for very specific reasons. coming specific reasons. you're coming because it's a nice place to live irrespective of what we're told. we're looked after considerably. well, there's a lot of socialism for a conservative country. you know, we've got the nhs , we've got the we've got the nhs, we've got the benefit system and if you know how to exploit it, then it's a great place to live, obviously. >> and this is the thing, when i first moved to this country 23 years were years ago, people who were people who came to this country were back were called asylum seekers back then , and then realised then, and then they realised because thought the only because they thought the only reason live reason people want to live in this country british this country because british people a bad people have such a bad reputation, they

reputation, bad self image, they think, , it must be horrible think, oh, it must be horrible where from in order to where they're from in order to want to live in england or britain. excuse now it's britain. excuse me. now it's morphed. it's now it's morphed back asylum seekers because back into asylum seekers because they to pretend that the they have to pretend that the end of the day when all the chickens have been plucked out, there are ways of handling this that that nation with a that that a real nation with a will to live and a will to power. to quote nietzsche, that sounded so confusing . sounded so confusing. >> you are outing yourself as a spy >> you are outing yourself as a spy to me. and i meant to repeat something about i'm not from this. >> i'm not from i'm not from this country when all the chickens have been plucked. this country when all the chi> the irrelevance to >> utterly. the irrelevance to the know, but trying to say >> i know, but i'm trying to say what i would say. >> i would say. listen, >> what i would say. listen, i don't want to you talking don't want to stop you talking because my favourite thing because it's my favourite thing to genuinely to. to listen genuinely to. >> you talk. believe you >> you talk. i don't believe you know, find it know, i say genuinely, i find it very amusing in many ways, in many ways it's not about who comes in, although i think people should add value to a society wherever they come from. >> it's about the number you can. what got is a can. what we've got is a

societal framework in which we can work. okay, that support . can work. okay, that support. it's everybody within that society. now that's got a finite number on it and we know it. >> no, i disagree with that. at the end of the at the end of the day, no chicken when the chickens have all been plucked. it's not about how many people can on the island because can fit on the island because it's a fungible thing. can fit on the island because it's it'angible thing. can fit on the island because it's it's notble thing. can fit on the island because it's it's not about ng. can fit on the island because it's it's not about the capacity. >> it's not about the capacity. it's the framework in it's about the framework in which operates nhs, which it operates. the nhs, let's the for argument's let's say the nhs for argument's sake, can only handle million sake, can only handle 1 million people can't. much people a year. it can't. much more that. let's say more than that. let's say for argument's if you put 1.5 argument's sake, if you put 1.5 million in there, you're 50% over million in there, you're 50% oveyou what? that's one >> you know what? that's one reason. that's not the best reason. but that's not the best reason. but that's not the best reason. best reason is reason. the best reason is, is it's lawlessness, that this it's lawlessness, is that this country lost control of country has lost control of itself and a country that does not have control over its borders , does not have does borders, does not have does doesn't deserve to be considered a country. >> we didn't even deploy full control. >> we had over borders when we were the eu. were in the eu. >> yeah, something worth bearing in mind to the guardian. paul, what's page? in mind to the guardian. paul, wh yes. page? in mind to the guardian. paul, wh yes. senior page? in mind to the guardian. paul, wh yes. senior female ge? in mind to the guardian. paul, wh yes. senior female staff >> yes. senior female staff reports sexual assault and

harassment at ministry of defence. so this is 60 senior women by which i believe they mean rank rather than their age. although it's not 100% clear in here, 60 are senior women at the uk's ministry of defence have described a hostile and toxic culture at the department in a letter that alleges sexual assault harassment and abuse by male colleagues. it assault harassment and abuse by male colleagues . it lists it male colleagues. it lists it goes on to list a few things here, which i think is important context. a woman said she was groped and mod social function but was advised against complaining a woman on an overseas posting who said she was touched repeatedly on the lower back and legs by a senior military officer. but the perpetrator went unpunished. and it gets slightly more sinister as the article goes on. so i don't think this is unsurprising. one thing i will say with the ministry, we're deaung say with the ministry, we're dealing with cultural things here. so i don't want by the way , i don't want to undermine this. i don't want to justify any of these things in any way.

the gate the floodgates are fully open now. we're in fully open now. so we're in a position where i'd imagine these women definitely be women will definitely be listened involved listened to and the men involved are trouble. are in a lot of trouble. however, if we look we take however, if we look if we take the environment ministry of the environment of ministry of defence, this is a very it has been previously a very male dominated environment with all with all its toxicity just being a natural part of the culture. so you either accept that a place in which people are taught to fight and survive is masculine and therefore accept some of the things that come with that . or you go down this with that. or you go down this road and you accept that we need to de—man in the whole process before something to say on that. >> but i do want to ask louis, how long did you work at the mod then? >>i then? >> i worked at the mod . it >> i worked at the mod. it sounds like . no, i'm about i'm sounds like. no, i'm about i'm about to. i'm about to take the other side, which is it's ridiculous with these with these women. these are top women and they're spoken over at meetings . they're spoken over at meetings. so we are subject to pejorative

language. we received unwanted attention and face sexual harassment. i mean, if i were a woman and sometimes i lie in bed at night and i feel when all of your chickens are when all the chickens have been plucked, my legs have been shaved, is i feel i feel attracted. i mean, if i were a woman, i'd be embarrassed . but especially one in the military . and the thing is, i military. and the thing is, i know some super tough women. they don't if someone touches their leg once. whoa, whoa, on their leg once. whoa, whoa, on the person who touched their leg victim blame here. >> they're not victim . >> i mean, they're not victim. >> i mean, they're not victim. >> blaming them >> i'm not victim blaming them because victims. because they're not victims. they're victims . they're they're not victims. they're people who have said somebody touched then he touched my leg and then he touched my leg and then he touched again and then he touched it again and then he touched it again and then he touched it again and then he touched it again. then he touched it again. and then he touched it again. and then he touched he touched it again. and then he touched it again. and then he touched is what. touched it again. is that what. that's what the article says. yeah. >> i think steve's going to >> but i think steve's going to add context, which i think add some context, which i think is going be welcome because is going to be welcome because i so far have said this is is going to be welcome because i so the have said this is is going to be welcome because i so the military.| this is is going to be welcome because i so the military.| ticome in the military. yeah. hey, come on. the boys being boys. on. it's the boys being boys. i think there is a good counter to that. >> think masculinity that >> i think the masculinity that is these situations is brought to these situations that protect that fight wars, that protect

nafions that fight wars, that protect nations oh, nations isn't the same as, oh, i have a little touch that. nations isn't the same as, oh, i havand.ittle touch that. nations isn't the same as, oh, i havand you touch that. nations isn't the same as, oh, i havand you can ch that. nations isn't the same as, oh, i havand you can separatet. nations isn't the same as, oh, i havand you can separate the two >> and you can separate the two and you should be able to separate the two. >> yeah, i think it's wrong to say got to say like, well, you've got to allow little bit of groping allow a little bit of groping because that's what men are like if fighting. is you if they're fighting. this is you can do one, not the other. >> this is the exact same story as the countries as our our as the countries refusing stop boats from refusing to stop the boats from coming. it's the exact same refusing to stop the boats from comiris it's the exact same refusing to stop the boats from comiris it'slackexact same refusing to stop the boats from comiris it'slack of|ct same story is the lack of masculinity. it's a totally feminine. speaking as feminine. i'm speaking as a as a not much a man, but it's a not much of a man, but it's a totally feminised country. we need to we need to stop this stuff. well, perhaps that could be a good thing. >> lewis proving that toxicity isn't necessarily always masculine . what about friday's masculine. what about friday's telegraph? are they leading telegraph? what are they leading with? telegraph? what are they leading witilewis leading with >> lewis they're leading with where we here? they're where are we here? they're leading same leading with the same story, which braverman . my plan which is braverman. my plan to get flights off the get rwanda flights off the ground. and i did. i did read the and i did read what the article and i did read what suella braverman who i'm somewhat of a fan of, but i couldn't figure out what her plan was, basically. >> except rishi look stupid . >> except rishi look stupid. >> except rishi look stupid. >> yeah. to make him look snow.

just to just to make herself keep relevant. she she got fired from a job. you don't want to be. nobody wants to be known as someone who got fired from job. >> i did enjoy a letter when she was fired, which listed all of the good reasons why did the the good reasons why she did the honourable thing and resigned. wait minute. wait a minute. >> with all of that. >> it was one heck of a letter, wasn't i mean, in the wasn't it? i mean, in the article it says first article here, it says the first article here, it says the first article being sacked. article since being sacked. of course, the former course, suella here, the former home secretary attacks prime home secretary attacks the prime minister's home secretary attacks the prime minown�*s home secretary attacks the prime minown five point plan to end our own five point plan to end the deadlock over deportation flights it doesn't the deadlock over deportation flinghat it doesn't the deadlock over deportation flinghat the it doesn't the deadlock over deportation flinghat the five it doesn't the deadlock over deportation flinghat the five points�*sn't the deadlock over deportation flinghat the five points are. i say what the five points are. i have i right? have read that am i right? >> didn't say what they. >> it didn't say what they. >> it didn't say what they. >> no, it didn't say that. lewis however, that, however, it does say that, of course, having in course, having having been in that for the last 12 that role for the last 12 months, knows that plan months, she knows that plan b doesn't well . it can't doesn't work as well. it can't work even if were to work because even if we were to get through british law that get through uk british law that was or whatever, we'd was changed or whatever, we'd still have to strasbourg still have to go to strasbourg and still a problem and there'd still be a problem there. that she's there. so the idea that she's probably going to come up with there. so the idea that she's prthatly going to come up with there. so the idea that she's prthat we ioing to come up with there. so the idea that she's prthat we needto come up with there. so the idea that she's prthat we need to come up with there. so the idea that she's prthat we need to remove�* with there. so the idea that she's prthat we need to remove allth is that we need to remove all association with the human rights. >> do you want to take a quick

hit at the other story on the front page? >> yeah. pc it's pc gone mad. that's not paul that is that's not paul cox that is political correctness. so this that's not paul cox that is pcatical correctness. so this that's not paul cox that is pca story:orrectness. so this that's not paul cox that is pca story about1ess. so this that's not paul cox that is pca story about ass. so this that's not paul cox that is pca story about a furyo this that's not paul cox that is pca story about a fury ashis is a story about a fury as police force warns that using the word policeman could be breaking the law. now, of course, this is designed to outrage. gammons like myself. it's not strictly true. they're trying to basically gender neutralise , gender, neutralise neutralise, gender, neutralise the language . there are some the language. there are some very amusing things as a result, though, you and i were talking about this just a moment ago. cops were told that cops were told also that they must phrases like man up must avoid phrases like man up and grow a pair. must avoid phrases like man up and grow a pair . and as you and grow a pair. and as you said, steve, it's not only men that can grow a pair. >> women have pairs, too. it's just different pairs of things, isn't lots of things the isn't it? lots of things in the human body in pairs. human body come in pairs. >> this is just further to all the we've in the the stuff that we've seen in the last years of last couple of years in terms of language being to make language being changed to make other people comfortable. other people feel comfortable. the that worries me the thing that always worries me about the thing they're about this is the thing they're trying to avoid the is trying to avoid the most is causing offence. and we've made being made offence being cool. we've made offence sort of a legal issue , made sort of a legal issue, made offence and offence. yeah. which

i think is a dangerous ground, but nothing but there's nothing about which is about the main story which is there's a war going on, there's a war between the left and the right, between team world and team britain. >> but, but there's also a major religious war going on in our own country that we can ignore . own country that we can ignore. and we're basically ignoring at our that's not comedy. >> i'm sure it'll get mentioned . >> i'm sure it'll get mentioned. i'm sure it'll come up again. >> that's it for part one. but on the way, we have bad news for the work. shy, bad news, what we normally give them a spot on

>> you're listening to gb news radio . radio. >> welcome back to headliners. i'm stephen allen. i'm still here with the two people who, when they aren't on tv, they're re—enacting that scene from officer and a gentleman. it's lewis paul cox. lewis schaffer and paul cox. >> you. thank you, steve. >> thank you. thank you, steve. i haven't heard the story . >> thank you. thank you, steve. i haven't heard the story. i'm sorry. >> the heard his name. and he

was like a greyhound at the tracks . the telegraph, lewis not tracks. the telegraph, lewis not yet. and it's bad news for my dream of getting one of those friends with benefit deals . friends with benefit deals. >> yes. well, i could be a friend with benefit benefits . friend with benefit benefits. unemployed who refused jobs will lose their benefits. as jeremy hunt is this the biggest non—story ever? i thought there were rules about that. if you don't do what they want you to do, you lose your benefits. and so jeremy hunt, who's the chancellor right? he says not real. well, who knows what? who knows what these people you know, what these people have so little power. you know, the prime minister i'll argue that sometimes they have too much . i sometimes they have too much. i don't know. i don't think that they do that. so he's saying if you if you don't if you if you have benefits and you don't get a job in 18 months and we ask you to get a job, you're going to your benefits are to be to your benefits are going to be cut. something cut. like that's something that's every country in that's new in every country in the world. even even when i was on benefits in all those

countries , two countries that countries, two countries that i lived in. >> lewis is benefits tour. >> lewis is benefits tour. >> get a couple of email addresses. >> i actually i actually met i had a i met a girlfriend when i was when i was on line at the unemployment office in new york. this is a law office in new york. and so we went out for a while and then she dumped me because she said i didn't have a job because i was cruel. >> just cruel. >> just cruel. >> cruel. do you come here often? no . so maybe, often? yeah. and no. so maybe, paul often? yeah. and no. so maybe, paul, story is this. yeah, paul, the story is this. yeah, those rules have all been in place. there's nothing more than tweaking, but showing that tweaking, but it's showing that the conservative party the current conservative party is show strength , even is trying to show strength, even if actually using strength. >> yeah. yeah you know , in terms >> yeah. yeah you know, in terms of their leadership , we're at of their leadership, we're at like five minutes to midnight, aren't we? so this type of it might as well be me making this policy at this point because within 12 months we're likely to have a different government , have a different government, most likely to be labour or labour are going to scrap anything like this anyway. labour essentially labour are essentially a

socialist government. they're probably look the probably going to look at the welfare, reform of their welfare, welfare reform of their own and it won't include things that the tories said 12 months ago. you bet bottom ago. you can bet your bottom dollar okay look, we dollar on that. okay look, we could argue till the cows come home or to the chickens have been plucked about type of been plucked about this type of stuff . the best thing to do is stuff. the best thing to do is to get people back into for to get people back into work for a number of reasons. not to get people back into work for a not number of reasons. not to get people back into work for a not just|ber of reasons. not to get people back into work for a not just for' of reasons. not to get people back into work for a not just for the reasons. not to get people back into work for a not just for the economy, ot just not just for the economy, but for their own wellbeing, for their mental health, for the for their mental health, for the for the for the greater good of a societal community. so i'd like to see people in incentivised back into work because if you if you can can stay on benefits and it be a lot easier for you than being at work , then why would being at work, then why would you give it up ? you give it up? >> yeah, i mean, i know there is an answer about a sense of purpose for and me there is health. yeah, but. but what about this? if you bring this plan in and it shows how look how are, we've we've how tough we are, we've we've been trying deal with here's been trying to deal with here's another we're another group we're dealing with. people another group we're dealing with aren't people another group we're dealing with aren't to people another group we're dealing with aren't to go people another group we're dealing with aren't to go and ople another group we're dealing with aren't to go and get who aren't going to go and get a job. so you cut off all their

benefits. who then has to pay for of the additional care for all of the additional care that's the taxpayer that's then needed? the taxpayer just different just through a different route? >> , no. get done. >> no, no, no. things get done. we masculine we live in a masculine world. not can't this . but we not me. i can't do this. but we live in a masculine world. we say, not working . say, okay, you're not working. we're in jail . and we're putting you in jail. and then and if jail is on paper by. and then. and then if they're in jail and that doesn't work, we beat them with a stick. we have to and then if it to pay for. and then if it doesn't, if we kill them, then we. death penalty, death penalty for being jobless. >> yeah . you see how quickly it >> yeah. you see how quickly it happens. yeah. see how that was barely even a paragraphs worth of going from reading one of these newspapers to saying kill these newspapers to saying kill the what? >> you know what? >> you know what? >> a chauffeur. >> i'm a chauffeur. >> i'm a chauffeur. >> on. i'm on gb news. >> i'm on. i'm on gb news. i didn't think affected me, but it. >> he's in the water when you dnnk in >> he's in the water when you drink in sun, and drink it in the sun, paul and the police say that they're sorry, but the they sorry, but in the defence they did no, sorry. did nothing. oh, no, sorry. that's wrong. yeah that's what they did wrong. yeah >> regret response >> yes. police regret response after stood by and watched after cops stood by and watched while pro palestine protesters climbed on the wall memorials. this was yesterday. most of our

viewers would have seen this many times . so the footage has many times. so the footage has emerged showing protesters scaling artillery scaling the royal artillery memorial , scaling the royal artillery memorial, which is on hyde park corner. and activists were seen waving palestinian flags and chanting free chanting things like free palestine and ceasefire. now, now , now, i've got a view on now, now, i've got a view on this, but the first thing i'd like to say, and i haven't said this today on twitter or anywhere else is that i don't blame the officers in this blame the beat officers in this particular you, blame the beat officers in this parwhy?r you, blame the beat officers in this parwhy? because you, blame the beat officers in this parwhy? because they're you, blame the beat officers in this parwhy? because they're the for why? because they're the first to the blame. first people to get the blame. and saw the guy like one and i saw the guy look like one of those volunteer police officers that we have of those volunteer police offic

fallen. have been fallen. he could have been attacked by anything attacked by them. anything could have needs to have happened. so there needs to be reform the that it be reform and the fact that it wasn't it doesn't break the law doesn't surprise me either. but let me tell you something. if i scaled union jack scaled a mosque in my union jack pyjamas tomorrow, they'd either find or they'd change the find a law or they'd change the law to get me in trouble, i think. >> w t the headlines >> and louis, the headlines a bit disingenuous, isn't it? because story, because in the actual story, the police regret not stopping the protesters getting there rather than nothing, than doing nothing, which is standing by and doing nothing. and actually, they stand and actually, they didn't stand by nothing . they got by and do nothing. they got people down from there. they just so just didn't arrest them. so people are angry that they weren't arrested, police weren't arrested, but the police weren't arrested, but the police weren't moment. weren't arrested, but the police werwell, moment. weren't arrested, but the police werwell, need moment. weren't arrested, but the police werwell, need to moment. weren't arrested, but the police werwell, need to be oment. weren't arrested, but the police werwell, need to be they it. >> well, they need to be they need, as we would call it, pro active people need to be punished . punished. >> the death penalty , genocide , >> the death penalty, genocide, record time. look at that one. we clock that within 30s. we go on on that. >> well, it's a mexican standoff. you know, it's like the police don't want to get involved and would you the involved and how would you the thing , though, that thing is, though, in that situation, is the what is situation, what is the what is the opposite that should be done

? >> e:- & that guy have arrest ? >> should that guy have arrest? you arrest and there you couldn't arrest and there wasn't broken. what should wasn't a law broken. what should he have because i've been he have done? because i've been thinking day. thinking about this all day. i was about was very angry about it. i thought something should have was very angry about it. i thougdone.nething should have been done. >> don't know there is >> i don't know what there is a there is a law that's broken, disturbing the peace, putting yourself reckless position. disturbing the peace, putting yoursel'tons reckless position. disturbing the peace, putting yoursel'tons there's;s position. there's tons there's tons. >> had >> people on twitter have had like a section five of some law, section 51. they found laws that could so it's could have been used. so it's not that we necessarily need another law being brought in. they how they just need guidance on how to we've got. to use the laws. we've got. because if you rush to because if you if you rush to bnngin because if you if you rush to bring in a new law and all of a sudden that will cover sudden that new law will cover other the whole being other things, the whole being able to do. >> didn't mean to >> sorry, i didn't mean to interrupt but it's interrupt you, but it's the whole is like every whole country is like this every single lack of single story shows a lack of will the people, not will amongst the people, not even the political the even the political leaders. the people. people lost people. the people have lost control of this country. it's you're in a state of maybe, maybe i'm wrong. maybe i'm pessimistic . and doomsday. but pessimistic. and doomsday. but it seems like it seems like the people have lost their will to control. >> what do we do about it? death penalty. okay no to the daily

mail . louis penalty. okay no to the daily mail. louis and an snp minister got caught by roaming charges bad news because if you get the independence you're after, that roaming charge is going to start as soon nip to. as soon as you nip to. >> carlisle well that >> carlisle yeah, well that death penalty for this guy anyway. tearful snp anyway. okay. a tearful snp minister blames teenage sons and i i used to have teenage i have i used to have teenage sons just a couple of years ago for racking up £11,000 ipad roaming charges and they said that he was watching they were watching football matches during moroccan holiday. i was like in shock, too. i thought to myself, are they still roaming charges? i don't leave the country. i don't like to leave the country. i'm afraid they're going i'm afraid they're not going to let back in. let me let me back in. please let me back love country back in. i love this country and so it's this so it's the guy. it's this minister, michael matheson. he's the health first he minister, michael matheson. he's the andth first he minister, michael matheson. he's the and he first he minister, michael matheson. he's the and he said first he minister, michael matheson. he's the and he said maybe st he minister, michael matheson. he's the and he said maybe he re minister, michael matheson. he's the and he said maybe he didn't lied and he said maybe he didn't lie, but he said, i didn't do it. sons didn't tell it. maybe his sons didn't tell him he was the thing, him that he was on the thing, but son's basically watched but his son's basically watched 2 or 3 football matches . 11th 2 or 3 football matches. 11th houn 2 or 3 football matches. 11th hour. this is morocco . hour. this is morocco. >> and when you look through the whole story, it's only it's less than gigabytes well. than four gigabytes as well. yeah. i mean, that's not

yeah. ouch. i mean, that's not the point here. but wow , that the point here. but wow, that much money for like four gigabytes. much money for like four gigaby'the internet. the chinese >> on the internet. the chinese internet, 30s worth internet, that's about 30s worth of download. >> why was this but isn't the issue not necessarily that issue it's not necessarily that he he's letting he lied. it's that he's letting people family access people in his family get access to what i imagine is relatively important documentation on an ipad. >> yeah, well, he is the health secretary he let's face it, scottish people are not very healthy, so. >> well, what's your take on this? >> the whole thing feels like one great lie to me. i don't one great big lie to me. i don't even believe the gigabytes even believe the four gigabytes thing. it's written in thing. i know it's written in here. that's we're here. i know. that's what we're told.i here. i know. that's what we're told. i would investigate that as well. say, how on as well. i would say, how on earth can four gigabytes of data cost that's cost £11,000? but that's a that's a very much side issue that's a very much a side issue on this. the guy could have avoided of by being avoided all of this by being honest front. now, all honest up front. now, we've all told porkies, but putting told a few porkies, but putting £11,000 expense claim for watching two football matches is a massive porky . now we must a massive porky. now we must have felt comfortable to do that. i'm not quite sure how this story come about. i don't know was freedom of know if it was a freedom of information act. i don't know how it leaked what

how it got leaked is what i mean, because he must have felt comfortable to put this on because not that because let's not forget that this hasn't come out until somebody else's challenged it. |, somebody else's challenged it. i, i think scottish i, i think the tory scottish leader challenging it forget the quy's leader challenging it forget the guy's name now all of a sudden so it has been found out and this could have all been avoided very easily. but it was obviously the environment in which he felt he would get away with that's what me with it. that's what worries me more anything. more than anything. >> on ranked >> should have blamed on ranked porn porn. >> should have blamed on ranked poryeah. porn. >> should have blamed on ranked poryeah. one)rn. >> should have blamed on ranked poryeah. one of. >> should have blamed on ranked poryeah. one of our favourites, >> yeah. one of our favourites, the telegraph. >> paul and lisa nandy doesn't want hear bodily parts, want to hear about bodily parts, so she won't enjoy my podcast. >> anyway . yeah. welcome >> but anyway. yeah. welcome to bodily parts with stephen allen. don't reduce trans debate to bodily parts, nandy tells jk rowling. i don't think this was in a conversation in anywhere in particular. so labour minister says society will be utterly ashamed in the future for the way transgender women are currently being treated. i think that's up for debate or to add a little bit more context here, she was asked in an interview recently rowling's remarks recently about rowling's remarks about voters about whether women voters can

trust party at the next trust her party at the next election, next election based on what nandy had said herself about the transgender issues. now of course, we need to include body parts in this. i hate to always boil these things down, but at the end of the day, the thing that differentiates women and men physically is their body parts. so we have to be able to if we if we are going to deny biology and science. and i'll come to you in a minute, as our science correspondent, stephen, we are going to stephen, but if we are going to deny science that anything, anything grabs, isn't anything is up for grabs, isn't it? so we to take it back it? so we have to take it back to fundamental basics, i think. and genitalia is a good place to start . start. >> $- @ certainly have your >> you can certainly have your genitals on. you can, genitals operated on. you can, in your definition of how you've just described this situation, post operative is it's the same as being a woman. you could cover talked about body parts a vauxhall courser engine in a ferrari chassis . ferrari chassis. >> you've still got a vauxhall courser engine . so i think the courser engine. so i think the whole point of my ridiculous analogy, even more analogy, which is even more ridiculous plucking ridiculous than plucking chickens, , is that the

chickens, is, is, is that the point that jk rowling has made all along? is that there are such things as biological women and it shouldn't be denied. and therefore there should be safe spaces for those biological women. that's all she's really asking for . and to say that asking for. and to say that that's transphobic to me, it's a bit of a misnomer. >> louis we're all scared now. >> louis we're all scared now. >> you know, it's well, it's the same thing . what are we fighting same thing. what are we fighting over? what's the difference between between the two sides? i mean , j.k. rowling says that mean, j.k. rowling says that that men who think that they're women should not be allowed in a prison . and the. prison. and the. >> yeah, i know. >> yeah, i know. >> but . okay. >> yeah, i know. >> but. okay. i'm sorry to interrupt as well, because i enjoy your flow as well. but isn't the actual argument men who don't think they're women, but can use the loophole there, the worrying you okay why don't we i'll say. >> i'll say there's a million different slight differences . as different slight differences. as jk rowling says , men who are jk rowling says, men who are enjoying the loophole are a threat to women. and the other

side is saying that even there might be a few a couple, a couple. but even if there are two, it's still more hurtful for the other side. people will laugh at this. meanwhile, the we're in the midst of a of a global war that is coming. >> i'm worried because i think we've just talked more sense than unbelievably expected. although my new is that was that sense well we're done for part two coming up bin laden's getting more popular but so are microplastics . so pick your microplastics. so pick your villain. we'll find out more shortly

>> you're listening to gb news radio . radio. >> welcome back to headliners to the daily mail. now paul and young people are fans of bin laden. just because he had a beard doesn't mean he's hipster. >> yeah. yeah. this is a worrying story, actually. it's quite fascinating, the psychology of this. so anti—israel. gen z—ers so people

born beyond, i think, 20,007, 2005, one young people, 20 year olds. so and bin laden's 2002 letter to america viral. so for those who don't know , bin laden, those who don't know, bin laden, obviously was the chief instigator warlord, whatever you want to call him, head of al—qaeda. and behind the plot of 911. and they've said here that it's become viral on tiktok with users saying that reading it has led them to it has led them to an understanding why the horrific attacks were carried out in 2001. now you can look at this many ways, actually. there are obviously there is there is reasons to look at that letter to try and find out what caused that. and it's important to understand that. but to glorify it is an issue. understand that. but to glorify it is an issue . and i think the it is an issue. and i think the problem, the hard left often have and people who buy into it sometimes times is that it'll take anything that's

anti—american and make it the colours they're going to nail to the mast and that gets them into trouble quite often. and this sort of thing will get will get them into trouble. we're all kind idealistic we're kind of idealistic when we're young, essentially it's the young, but essentially it's the direction travel we're going direction of travel we're going in at the moment. it's getting worse worse. and worse and worse and worse. and america and all of america and the west and all of those appear . realism are those things appear. realism are shown and anything shown as bad, and anything absolutely anything against it is good, irrespective . and this is good, irrespective. and this is good, irrespective. and this is a case of that here. yeah >> and let's cross now to our resident anti—american, louis schaeffer . schaeffer. >> i mean, there are certain things i don't like about america. i mean, if they're going to if they're going to listen to what bin laden says and as that reasonable, what are they going to bring back hitler and going read mein and say, i'm going to read mein kampf all there. kampf because it's all there. that's joke . i mean, that's a joke. i mean, obviously, get obviously, it didn't get any laughs, the this is the war. laughs, but the this is the war. the war is the left hates america . europe. when i say america. europe. when i say europe, i don't mean england. i

mean the left of europe, the french, german dialectic there hates america . so that's one war hates america. so that's one war that's going on. in the meantime, in the meantime, there are other forces that really hate america. so we're being attacked from within and from without. and when i say america, i mean britain, because britain is basically so it's a cultural and value problem as well. >> so what we're seeing with the pro—palestine marches is i don't believe they're all anti—israel or they are a lot or anti jew, but they are a lot of sort of anti this of them sort of anti this establishment figure, whatever that might be. and in this case, it's america and this is happening america our happening within america in our case, it's us or the case, over here, it's us or the establishment in some way. and it's mistaken it's been mistaken for good versus bad . versus bad. >> and yes, that's yeah, it's exactly that. it's become no nuance, but when you get to the stage where you're agreeing with bin laden, surely you have a moment. >> well, i don't think they do, do i don't and do they? i don't think. and that's worries about that's what worries me about this to guardian, louis this to the guardian, louis and elon that jewish elon musk thinks that jewish people don't like white people. >> he's talking >> well, this he's talking about, you know, well, in a way he because this is a very

he is because this is a very complicated and complicated issue because and i don't think i'm the perfect don't think and i'm the perfect person explain whether person to explain it, whether whether it's involved plucked chickens in a way, it's kind of there are kosher chickens and there are kosher chickens and there are kosher chickens and there are not kosher chickens. elon musk agrees tweet elon musk agrees with tweet accusing against accusing jews of hatred against whites , which is like mental. whites, which is like mental. okay because everybody in the world thinks that jews are white people when i was growing up in new york, i was i thought of myself as a black person. i there were jews, there were white people . and they lived white people. and they lived across the bay in in manhasset. but jews as a group, we were killed by hitler because we were not white, we weren't aryan, which meant white. and what's happenedis which meant white. and what's happened is , is that the adl, happened is, is that the adl, which is the anti, the whatever it's called, the defence league, the whatever, i forgot what it's called anyway. is that , is that called anyway. is that, is that a group of anti—defamation league is the, is the some jews

are so white that that they have excuse me are so woke that they have forgot charleton that they are no longer black. >> paul, can you explain that in a way that i might get i mean, lewis is making a good point. >> there in amongst all of that, he's essentially saying, you know, and that's not forget that. let's take everything on balance here. no one is saying that in this argument for instance, that all jewish people are great, all palestinians are bad, or vice versa . now, some bad, or vice versa. now, some are they're ignorant and stupid . are they're ignorant and stupid. what's happening here, however , what's happening here, however, and we know it's quite dodgy because the guardian looked like they're taking some sort of stance anti—white stance against anti—white racism. of course they're not. they're stance with they're taking a stance with their narrative, which happens to be against the jewish people at moment. interesting see, at the moment. interesting see, the elon musk is that the story with elon musk is that this anti defamation league have been on his back for some time now and have treated him quite

appallingly , according to him. appallingly, according to him. and he is saying that he has seen anti—white racism against himself from these people . and himself from these people. and so that's why lewis's point makes some sense, is that there are probably still jewish people who see themselves as non—white. and interesting when lewis and it's interesting when lewis says this, because right now i've never i i consider i've never i mean, i consider all jewish people to be white. lewis looks white to me. you are, aren't you? >> no , no, he said earlier. >> no, no, he said earlier. well, i it depends what team this is. i'm fungible. i don't think that's the right word . is think that's the right word. is thatis think that's the right word. is that is that at some moments i'm a white guy and some guys. some moments i'm black guy. and moments i'm a black guy. and that's this story is so that's why this story is so amazing, because . because ella. amazing, because. because ella. because as people are looking at this story and saying, wait a second, jews aren't white to the telegraph, do you think do you agree with me later? >> we've honestly got to run out for reasons. but i will for time reasons. but i will also as also pretend i'm using that as an excuse. the telegraph paul more using imitation more people are using imitation guns are prop comics. yeah prop comics are increase in use of

fake guns as a result of success in restricting access to convention and converted firearms . firearms. >> the national crime agency says so. this is in the uk and the statistics show that offences involving imitation weapons jumped up from 13% to 2130 in the 12 months up to march from 1880 nine inches the previous year. and of the imitation firearms used in offences, 85% of them were ball beanng offences, 85% of them were ball bearing guns or airsoft weapons. so when i first read this until i got that to that piece of information, i thought this is a good thing because it's much more get a hold of more difficult to get a hold of legitimate and guns legitimate guns and make guns in some and i was thinking, some way. and i was thinking, well, of course, imitation guns can't but they can't hurt people, but they can. you take to the eye you know, take a gun to the eye or up close to an airsoft. you could probably, sure, you could probably, i'm sure, if you tried hard enough kill tried hard enough, kill somebody. not necessary somebody. so it's not necessary a good thing, but it's a lot safer than firearm or. no, no. safer than a firearm or. no, no. >> whenever you whenever you

pull out, whenever a gun is pulled in a crime, they have to alert the gun squad. they can't they can't send. so it's a major palava for the police. >> the police come in. imitation gun squad. >> the police come in. imitation gurno,jad. >> the police come in. imitation gur no, they got to send guys >> no, they got to send guys with real guns. they come in and then somebody can get proper killed. just killed. even though it's just a fake . the truth it's not fake gun. the truth is, it's not that many guns. it's only like 2500 offences and the shocking thing from this story is that only 28% of them were sent to prison for using a gun. >> imitation guns. yeah. >> imitation guns. yeah. >> you try to fit this one in. before the break, the guardian . before the break, the guardian. lewis and loneliness is a public health threat. imagine the shame of prescribed friend of being prescribed a friend on the nhs . the nhs. >> well, they they they >> yeah, well, they they they were thinking about that with the with the. anyway the world health organisation . okay. which health organisation. okay. which is, which is part of the united nations. and it's a tool of world governance team, world. it says that loneliness is a pressing global problem and they're blaming covid and they're blaming covid and they're blaming covid and they're blaming, they're blaming covid and they're blaming , they're blaming they're blaming, they're blaming not enough internet and the

climate crisis for causing this. but let's face it, the world health organisation and team world, they spend their entire time promoting birth control, promoting the end of the family, preventing preventing neighbourhoods and communities, preventing nations and states, and promoting people not having children, which causes loneliness. the thing that prevent loneliness is being married. you pray for lonely . married. you pray for lonely. this . the paul loneliness does this. the paul loneliness does it bother you? >> do you have it? i love it. >>— >> do you have it? i love it. >> yeah. i think it all depends, doesn't it? if loneliness is a choice , which is kind of what choice, which is kind of what you're alluding to, and i believe is the crux of lewis's joke , which is it's a luxury, joke, which is it's a luxury, isn't it? it's a nice to have, but perpetual loneliness. and i always there's some bits in this. i find the who and big global organisations like this slightly sinister, slightly sinister . they they've they've sinister. they they've they've implicated a lot of loneliness and a lot of people over the

last few years. >> well that's it for >> okay well that's it for another part. one more to go with selfies and dating apps. what wrong? what could possibly go wrong? we'll

soon welcome back to headlines as the times. now lewis and selfies could be bad for your health there will be if you do one in front of me when i'm trying to walk. >> yeah. selfies should be deemed a health threat, deemed a public health threat, unquote. after hundreds of unquote. quote after hundreds of deaths and this is in a fantastic story in the times and it says that there's a guy in australia who did a comprehensive study and found out that in the 13 years up to 2021 that that this people taking selfies at beauty spots is such a danger. it's like poses a threat comparable to driving without a seatbelt or smoking . it's that bad but then smoking. it's that bad but then you read how many people died from from selfie taking a selfie

. 400 in 13 years. that's like 30 a year. 30 a year. is it harsh of me to say, yeah, that the 400 people who died taking selfies were the kind of people who take selfies . who take selfies. >> so yes. yeah. it is harsh to point. >> it's not harsh . louis >> it's not harsh. louis schaefer you're saying you're saying it's, it's a darwin effect or whatever that's called. darwin, isn't it? yeah, but why, but i'm asking . called. darwin, isn't it? yeah, but why, but i'm asking. i'll ask you. i'll ask you. is, is that big. is that big. >> 400 people died another way , >> 400 people died another way, but even 400 people. >> are you going to value likes over life? >> yeah. the chances are. and it's essentially what's happening there. you're trying to get the best selfie of yourself. it's very self indulgent. yeah, it's all about the . i mean, obviously the ego. i mean, obviously stupidity should be considered a health and safety risk as well. and what's going on here. and that's what's going on here. and that's what's going on here. and i know these are largely young people and it's quite sad. but but 400 is not a lot. what's in the last 13 years we've had a tory government. i imagine

they've killed more than 400 people. yeah but it's still ridiculous, isn't it, because of the idea of taking a photograph of yourself in the nicest possible way for likes is worth anything at all? yeah. >> yeah. wait, can i just ask. can i ask a question? do you think that should be like, a like a cup that you could have, like, a value. totally value again. value. value or likes over life ? value. life's over. over life? value. life's over. >> whether you're flogging your words. i will say me and the missus on holiday once. and we're beautiful place like sicily or whatever. i can't remember now. doesn't matter. but was someone just but there was someone we just saw view with a poor saw walk into view with a poor boyfriend. to take a ton of boyfriend. i to take a ton of pictures. she had an umbrella thing light right. thing to get the light right. and sure if ask her what and i'm sure if you ask her what the scenery looked like, you'd have idea. had have no clue. no idea. had a houday have no clue. no idea. had a holiday where she didn't see any of the things, but just took loads for instagram. loads of pictures for instagram. so them. so 400 of them. >> steve times . >> steve to the times. >> steve to the times. >> paul and meeting your wife on a dating app might be bad. i mean, it would certainly shock

mean, it would certainly shock me she's told me she's me because she's told me she's not anymore. not doing that anymore. that's an joke . an old joke. >> wait, i wasn't listening. >> wait, i wasn't listening. >> no, we can't do it again. come on. it's live, lewis. it's live . live. >> what do you mean? is this live? it's live. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> you're tv . >> you're on tv. >>— >> you're on tv. >> on a dating app >> why? meeting on a dating app means your marriage may be less stable. so nearly. is an stable. so nearly. this is an interesting part of this. actually. nearly a century ago, james observed that james bosshard observed that most married couples met while living in the same neighbourhoods, saying cupid may have wings, but apparently they are not adapted for long flights . so since then , the business of . so since then, the business of finding a mate has become has been transformed by dating apps and point they're saying and the point is they're saying it's stable because we're it's less stable because we're meeting much wider meeting people from much wider outside of our geographical area. we might have less in common. et cetera. et cetera. however, the statistics of this particular poll show that actually most of the people interviewed aged 35. interviewed are aged 18 to 35. so if they were married, they were only recently married. they were only recently married. they were most likely to have used dating apps at that age anyway,

because as you know, that's how you meet people now. they do go on this . they do go on in this on this. they do go on in this article to say there's still some around meeting some stigma around meeting people apps. i can't people on dating apps. i can't believe that at all. i mean, i see a lot of comedy clubs and i talk about this thing. you know, i'll often people how they i'll often ask people how they met from the met people from all the demographic ranges meet demographic and age ranges meet on on apps now but they on on on apps now but they should stop asking people if they're happily married though because wants to because nobody really wants to hear married hear from happily married people. start . people. for a start. >> at two, there are >> at number two, there are none.thein >> at number two, there are none. the in terms of emceeing and chatting to people at gigs. >> i did a gig in sawbridgeworth and there was a couple in the in the front row and they met onune the front row and they met online they were asked, online and they were asked, where you meet? website where did you meet? what website do everyone's do you meet? and everyone's thinking, you know, if it's plenty fish, you probably plenty of fish, you probably don't she admitted don't say it. and she admitted it craigslist. it was craigslist. >> well, yeah, apparently there was the website in was a section of the website in the for ups. the old days, just for hook ups. >> yeah well, that was >> wow. yeah well, that was considered racy. it's all considered racy. now it's all hook ups. the reason why this they're not happy today as opposed to in the past. it's not

because of dating apps. it's because of dating apps. it's because they're having relationships today and everything is geared to breaking up because they don't want stable families. they don't want children. they want independent people because it's the death of love. and you could look on my calendar , which has it says calendar, which has it says choose life, eat meet. and that's that's not appropriate for this but well on to the guardian lewis before we sell too many and here we go eating plant based food may cut heart disease paul let's go and get a coffee. >> yeah . >> yeah. >> yeah. >> lewis, over to you, mate. there's absolutely no point in steve and i being involved in this whatsoever. >> no, you know, why don't you show that you've learned something these something about why these stories ? stories are ridiculous? >> largely because this is your story. >> oh, my story story. » on story. >> oh, my story ? oh >> oh, is it my story? oh doesn't help focus and cognitive ability, but it might. you know what? >> this is the i'm not opting out. >> this is the worst show that i've ever done. i want to apologise. >> i've done loads of you every. >> i've done loads of you every. >> we all know which one was you

were. >> okay. sorry about that. i don't i thought you were don't know. i thought you were talking plant talking to steve plant based swaps cut diabetes and swaps make cut diabetes and heart this is one heart disease risk. this is one of know, could could of those, you know, could could possibly . maybe it's also a it's possibly. maybe it's also a it's an association study that they did out of germany. it's an epidemiology where they look and they say if you do one thing, if one thing happened, it's not even if you do something is if one thing happens, does it change anything ? and they say change anything? and they say that people who change from eating processed food to eating less processed food have a 20% decrease. are you doing are you still talking about the stuff that's in the story or just your own personal. yeah, this is the story. i half the story. story. i read half the story. you read these stories to you can't read these stories to try and cram this as well, try and cram this one as well, because mail lewis and try and cram this one as well, b

>> oh, wow . >> oh, wow. >> oh, wow. >> oh, wow. >> oh, my god. oh, my god. oh, yes, it is. sorry, steve. >> oh, okay. so british ultra. >> oh, okay. so british ultra. >> no, you're right. it is your worst show. >> it is my worst show. >> it is my worst show. >> british ultra marathon cheat who was banned from the sport after using a car to skip two and a half mid—race and a half miles. mid—race breaks silence, we breaks her silence, saying, we all mistakes . and didn't all make mistakes. and didn't she? because they tracked she? just because they tracked it, we tracked it . i mean, she's it, we tracked it. i mean, she's an ultramarathon runner. this is like she only did like 250 miles. and she only did about two and half miles of about two and a half miles of them they're near in an them because they're near in an uber whatever. enough. uber or whatever. fair enough. and away with it. and she didn't get away with it. >> but the interesting >> steve but the interesting thing is that a runner thing is, is that she's a runner and been banned for a year and she's been banned for a year right . but the truth is, the right. but the truth is, the truth is she's been punished enough because the fact she has to run the price of driving these days, the show is nearly over. >> oven >> let's take another quick look at pages . the at friday's front pages. the daily mail goes with unelected lords plot to block rwanda law that could end in scenes like this. the telegraph braverman my plan to get rwanda flights off

the ground . the guardian goes the ground. the guardian goes with senior female staff reports sexual assault and harassment at ministry of defence . the i new ministry of defence. the i new benefits crackdown if jobless don't accept work. the times goes with look for a job or lose free nhs medicines and the sun. it's pc gone mad. that's all we have time for. it's pc gone mad. that's all we have time for . thank you to my have time for. thank you to my guest paul cox and lewis schaffer. leo kearse will be here tomorrow at 11 with nicholas de santo and scott capurro going through the papers. if you're watching the 5 am. one, stay tuned . breakfast am. one, stay tuned. breakfast on the way. next till next time, have

the prime minister warning that tinkering with the failed plan will not work and that no asylum seekers will be sent to rwanda

before the next general election . why are you here? >> shame on you. shame on you . >> shame on you. shame on you. shame on you . shame on you. >> labour is riding high in the polls, but division over the party's middle east stance threatens to bring their party, too, into civil war territory. olivia utley will have all the latest keir starmer in scotland today for what could be a very awkward visit indeed. >> find out with me very shortly . and a gb news exclusive investigate an explosive allegations that a job centre has given violent sexual offenders and even murderers work placements without any restrictions or monitoring . restrictions or monitoring. >> and the government announces over £8 million of funding to tackle potholes and resurface roads as it makes up for the scrapping of hs2. roads as it makes up for the scrapping of hs2 . we'll be scrapping of hs2. we'll be quizzing the transport minister on the state of our roads later on.and on the state of our roads later on. and as always, we want to hear from you. please send us your pictures and