tv The Saturday Five GB News December 3, 2023 12:00am-1:01am GMT
12:00 am
the. >> it's 7 pm. and this is the. saturday five. welcome to the saturday five, baby, it's cold outside, but it's about to warm up in here as we treat you to an hour of very heated debate. i'm delighted to say i'm joined by three new faces tonight, the brilliant head of campaigns at the taxpayers alliance, elliot kay. fantastic political commentator chloe dobbs, and she's director of the common sense society. so we might finally get some rational discussion around here. welcome. emma webb now, with all these new faces , what you really these new faces, what you really need alongside you is a wise old head full of sage wisdom and helpful advice. but instead, as always, i'm joined by the wokeist man in britain, benjamin butterworth. this could be a bumpy ride. you know, the ropes. by bumpy ride. you know, the ropes. by now, folks. each host gets about 60s to outline their argument about a chosen topic. then we're all pile in and it's
12:01 am
like rats in a sack. it's messier than matt hancocks appearance at the covid inquiry. and of course, we want to know your views as well. get in touch by emailing gb views at gbnews.com. but before we start tearing each other apart , it's tearing each other apart, it's a saturday night news with ray addison . addison. >> thanks, darren. good evening . >> thanks, darren. good evening. our top stories tonight, fresh weather warnings for snow and ice are in force until midday tomorrow for many parts of the uk . forecasters are saying that uk. forecasters are saying that temperatures could drop to —12 in parts of scotland . meanwhile, in parts of scotland. meanwhile, cumbria police have declared a major incident due to heavy snow with some vehicles stuck in traffic. meteorologist john hammond says the cold temperatures won't last that long. >> the focus of the cold shifting northwards , something a shifting northwards, something a bit milder, trying to push in from the south. then the cold air sweeps back south again later on monday into tuesday . so later on monday into tuesday. so we're not waving goodbye to this
12:02 am
cold spell just yet. i think through the middle of the week, potentially further severe frost and later on this week into and then later on this week into next weekend , a complete next weekend, a complete transformation . it's going to transformation. it's going to turn mild , wet, windy, soggy and turn mild, wet, windy, soggy and horrible . horrible. >> a british soldier killed in kenya was just days from finishing his tour of the country . major kevin mccall was country. major kevin mccall was off duty when he died on wednesday . off duty when he died on wednesday. his off duty when he died on wednesday . his father says he wednesday. his father says he was shot while on a motorbike trip. the 32 year old had served in europe, the middle east, the falklands and africa. joseph mccall paid tribute to his son, describing him as special and saying that his family was incredibly proud of his achievements . an 84 year old man achievements. an 84 year old man who died following a huge house explosion in edinburgh has been named locally as james smith. the blast, which happened in the babaton area last night, was heard from several miles away. mr smith is understood to have beenin mr smith is understood to have been in a neighbouring property.
12:03 am
a 43 year old woman and a 54 year old man were both taken to hospital. police say there are no suspicious circumstances . no suspicious circumstances. football fans who were charged following clashes in birming ham on thursday night have now been granted bail. a special court session has been taking place after violence erupted ahead of aston villa's match against legia warsaw. almost 33 of the defendants were granted conditional bail, including a 22 year old polish woman who pleaded not guilty to violent disorder for west midlands. police say that five officers were injured after several poush were injured after several polish fans were told that they would not be allowed into the stadium on train . drivers have stadium on train. drivers have been braving the to cold attend picket lines as they begin a week of industrial action over pay - week of industrial action over pay. commuters week of industrial action over pay . commuters across the pay. commuters across the country are facing seven days of travel disruption on know east midlands trains are running today and there's a limited service between london and scotland on lner has left . scotland on lner has left. members recently voted to
12:04 am
continue walkouts for the next six months. the rail delivery group says they should accept an 8% pay offer, but shadow culture secretary thangam debbonaire says the government needs to start negotiating strikes. >> help none of us, you know, the working people who want to get to work, people who want to get to work, people who want to get to work, people who want to get to visit family and friends, it's really important that these strikes are settled as soon as possible. hope that possible. and i really hope that the government the unions the government and the unions can that and a fair can negotiate that and a fair settlement as soon as they can. >> us says it will not >> the us says it will not permit relocation of permit the forced relocation of palestinians gaza or the palestinians from gaza or the west bank under any circumstances. vice president kamala harris made the comment on the sidelines of cop 28 in dubal on the sidelines of cop 28 in dubai. she also says the us won't allow the besieged mint of gaza or any redrawing of borders. >> the united states is unequivocal international humanitarian law must be respected . too many innocent respected. too many innocent palestinians have been killed .
12:05 am
palestinians have been killed. frankly, the scale of civilian suffering and the images and videos coming from gaza are devastating as israel pursues its military objectives in gaza. we believe israel must do more to protect innocent civilians . to protect innocent civilians. >> this is gb news across the uk on tv in your car, on digital radio and on your smart speaker by saying play gb news now let's get back to all five of them . get back to all five of them. >> it's saturday night and you're with the saturday five. welcome to the debate and jungle and nobody is getting out of here until we've had an hour of lively and topical discussion. let's crack on with tonight's first debate. >> now then , darren, what have >> now then, darren, what have you got for us this week? well emma, let me tell you, i'm not happy with this majesty the king, because , well, the king, because, well, the temperature's dropping. >> nights are drawing >> and the nights are drawing in, but the are keen in, folks. but the bbc are keen to remind us that we're in for
12:06 am
climate change as colder days and nights used to be known as winter meanwhile martin winter folks. meanwhile martin lewis, the financial guru , is lewis, the financial guru, is sounding the alarm bells. he says prepare to shell out more for your energy bills than ever before or as january's energy price cap. the rise of that look starts to look like something like a bad hangover after a new year's bash, i'm reminded of the story of the late barbara bolton. she was 87 years old of greater manchester. she was a widow and a retired pharmacy assistant. now, folks , she was assistant. now, folks, she was so petrified by the cost of her heating last winter that she chose to brave the cold. now, this poor soul was whisked away by paramedics suffering from hypothermia only to pass away in hospital . a tragic casualty of hospital. a tragic casualty of this energy crisis. now yet as barbara's story, of course , tugs barbara's story, of course, tugs at our heartstrings, the climate change high priests have embarked on their annual pill grimage this time to dubai for
12:07 am
cop 28. at least they'll save a penny or two on their heating costs. their dubai , with its costs. their dubai, with its glittering skyscrapers and its oil laden coffers , plays host to oil laden coffers, plays host to the world's glitterati , all the world's glitterati, all there to solve the world's net zero goals. it's a bit like hosting an alcoholics anonymous meeting in a brewery , isn't it? meeting in a brewery, isn't it? king charles iii. our dear leader, rishi sunak as well . leader, rishi sunak as well. he's there. he announced a £i.6 he's there. he announced a £1.6 billion of your for money international climate finance , international climate finance, but he can't find the money to help you with your energy bills. and lord cameron of china, they were all there. sorry. i mean, lord cameron of chipping norton. i do beg your pardon . for each i do beg your pardon. for each of them commandeered separate private jets to grace this cop. 28 conference carbon footprint be damned . now, king charles be damned. now, king charles iii, has been a bit of a prophet on climate change, hasn't he? well, here he is back in 2009, the then prince of wales, he
12:08 am
gave us a dire 96 month deadline to save the world. well, folks were over 170 months later right now. and shockingly, i'm still here. it's almost as if these doomsday predictions are about as reliable as a chocolate teapot. the net zero agenda with its climate alarmism and calls for sacrifice seems more about stripping away power, liberty and money from folks like barbara bolton . it's a medley of barbara bolton. it's a medley of questionable signs , skewed questionable signs, skewed statistics and a smorgasbord of vested interests . and let's not vested interests. and let's not forget the king's sartorial blunder sporting a greek tie amid a diplomatic tiff over the elgin marbles. and i say really , elgin marbles. and i say really, your majesty? such antics only serve to tarnish his image in our eyes from i'm going to say this from clown prince to cop king. now, in doing so , making king. now, in doing so, making speeches far beyond anything our late and great queen ever did, king charles risks alienating large swathes of brits who see
12:09 am
right through the hot air balloon from these climate conferences. i think it's high time the king realised he is now king. the hot air from dubai isn't going to heat our homes or restock our bank balances. a foolish king would continue to be the pr poster boy for police and poverty over power. now emma webb, i'm afraid to say that i'm a staunch monarchist, but i'm very upset by the king. over recent days, it has to be said, it's very unpatriotic. it is. i'm afraid. i'm afraid. i am. i'm afraid. i'm afraid. i am. i'm upset. i'm sure i'm going to get loads of emails saying how wrong i am to challenge the king like this. >> you're right, though, and i think, though, that you know, king we expected he was king charles, we expected he was going a lot more political going to be a lot more political actually, than he has been. he's restrained think, restrained himself, i think, more anybody expected. but more than anybody expected. but the that it seems the reality is that it seems that royal family are that the royal family are not receiving particular good advice, it seems, because they should know very well that
12:10 am
whether they have advisors or not, even if they were in a bubble, it would be very difficult for them to not realise. it's sort of like marie antoinette being locked up away from the public, not recognising that environment . fatalism is that environment. fatalism is not an apolitical subject anymore. and actually it's the same thing with william. he needs to tread very carefully because these are highly politicised issues and simply speaking at cop and i think there was a previous year, maybe it was last year, he decided not to go and he should be keeping his his mitts entirely clean of all of this stuff, allegedly on government advice not to go . and government advice not to go. and hopefully this isn't a sign that he's decided that actually he's not going to be as withdrawn as he has succeeded in being. so far. >> benjamin, did you think the tie was a step too far? i mean, i know you agree with him on all of this climate nonsense. you'd probably quite like a trip to dubaiand probably quite like a trip to dubai and this cop 28. >> i rather like dubai. it's a guilty pleasure. but look, you know who was it? tell me that
12:11 am
spoke at cop 27 in glasgow. >> who was it? it was the queen. >> who was it? it was the queen. >> the late queen. >> the late queen. >> and so did she say all of this? >> she said a lot of things. >> she said a lot of things. >> the world is going to die. we're all going to burn. >> she said a lot of things about the importance of saving the environment. and she was the keynote when hosted keynote speaker when we hosted cop, incredibly proud cop, and i was incredibly proud to someone of to see someone of that generation that life generation and that life experience leading way on experience leading the way on that. proud when king that. and i was proud when king charles year and charles opened cop this year and the whole world sits there and listens to the head the listens to the head of the british talking about the british state talking about the biggest issue that the world faces. you might be a little englander who doesn't want our leaders to take leadership on the biggest issue. we face. but it made me proud be british. it made me proud to be british. and fact is that people like and the fact is that people like barbara bolton weren't barbara from bolton weren't freezing of the costs of freezing because of the costs of climate change. they were freezing because we failed to develop our own sources of heating and light and energy , heating and light and energy, and we became reliant on warlords from other countries. >> as soon as eight. miliband
12:12 am
introduced the climate change act, we started prioritising bloody windmills. >> you get more desperate every week, having to blame a sectary of state from what, 2008, nine, ten, because that's when pathetic. that's pathetic . the pathetic. that's pathetic. the fact is that we have failed to secure our energy security . and secure our energy security. and that's one of the reasons why, when things went awry overseas , when things went awry overseas, we were vulnerable and trying to blame that on why that woman from manchester did was too afraid to use their heating while these companies make hundreds of millions of pounds, often they don't pay the kind of tax that people would expect them to pay, that you are completely wrong. >> so we need more tax. elliott to actually buy more windmills and panels. i'm sure and solar panels. and i'm sure you'll agree, outside you'll agree, looking outside right solar panels would right now, solar panels would work , wouldn't they? work a treat, wouldn't they? >> well, i certainly disagree with and listen, the with that. and listen, the second solar second you build more solar farms, farms, that is farms, more wind farms, that is energy goes to the energy that goes on to the international unless international market. unless you're putting up international market. unless y(very, putting up international market. unless y(very, very putting up international market. unless y(very, very high putting up international market. unless y(very, very high borderting up international market. unless y(very, very high border around a very, very high border around the united and stopping the united kingdom and stopping the united kingdom and stopping the from going on. the energy supply from going on. >> he says market,
12:13 am
>> so he usually says market, then think their argument then i think their argument is for birds. then i think their argument is for i birds. then i think their argument is for i thinkis. then i think their argument is for i think possibly potentially >> i think possibly potentially the person have an issue the person you have an issue with though, is rishi with here, though, is rishi sunak , who didn't allow the king sunak, who didn't allow the king to go to cop27 last year potentially sensibly, given what we've seen this year. and i think the rishi allowed the king to go this year. and i think it's not a surprise that the king used the platform to speak his mind, although i do agree that it his mind, although i do agree thatitis his mind, although i do agree that it is troubling chloe. >> i mean, belgium says that i'm a little englander and do you know what i would say? i'm on the side of the british people. that's what i would say to that. whose side are you on? >> i am going little bit >> i am going to be a little bit in middle ground here. oh, in the middle ground here. oh, here we are. >> we've got a lib dem on the panel >> oh, gosh. so climate change, it used to be a non—party pisan issue. and when you saw suddenly the loons sitting on the the eco loons sitting on the ground gluing hands the ground gluing their hands to the floor, seem floor, making this movement seem like thing, like a crazy left wing thing, then suddenly became then it suddenly became something now yes, we something political. now yes, we can debate how important of an issue it is . are we all going to
12:14 am
issue it is. are we all going to die tomorrow? yes you're right that there have been many cases of lots of scaremongering. and when we're going being when we're going to die being greatly exaggerated , covid and greatly exaggerated, covid and those haven't come true. but that climate that doesn't mean that climate change not a serious issue. change is not a serious issue. so you know, how do we decide what is partisan, what is non—partisan, just because some people sit in road glued to people sit in the road glued to the floor doesn't mean, just to be clear, political issue. >> be clear, you know, >> just to be clear, you know, all major committed all the major parties committed to net in their manifesto. to net zero in their manifesto. so there a democratic mandate so there is a democratic mandate from the three biggest parties in this country, plus several others. that doesn't mean that this is what britain is committed and it's written committed to, and it's written in law. and you talk about the commonwealth and being a patriot. it's commonwealth patriot. well it's commonwealth countries , islands in our countries, islands in our commonwealth that are most being affected by climate change, that are seeing rising sea levels ruin economies, ruin their ruin their economies, ruin their ability to live. and i think the king, the head of the commonwealth, has a moral responsibility and a duty to those people that don't have the voice that he has. so will you commit then, to save the
12:15 am
commonwealth nations by not flying again for the rest flying ever again for the rest of look, i always so . of your life? look, i always so. well, hang on. i always say that the reason this can't be solved by simply putting up people's bills making ryanair bills and making ryanair more expensive, be solved expensive, it has to be solved by technology. green technology. that get in that means that we can get in cars and we can go on planes without the damage. britain without the damage. and britain can because we're can lead on that because we're a highly educated economy. i know you're highly you're not one of those highly educated highly taxed on educated people, highly taxed on shining , a educated people, highly taxed on shining, a highly taxed inaya. >> but we're all going to be saved by this elusive green technology next, it's technology. but up next, it's elliott. have you elliott. elliott what have you got us? got for us? >> well, darren, touching on actually cop 28 and various major international summits between 2009 and 2021, the united kingdom and united kingdom taxpayers , to be kingdom taxpayers, to be specific, gave global quangos. organisations like the united nations, the imf, the who. £85 billion. now in 2016 we had a major national debate about who makes the laws in this country, and we chose to take back control, take back some element of our sovereignty from the
12:16 am
european union. but actually sitting right next to the european union is a massive web of international organisations that have gone well beyond the remit of when they were set up. in most cases, following the war. and these are organisations that are taking increasing control and exerting increasing influence over our lives and over uk policy and are taking ever more money from tax payers andindeed ever more money from tax payers and indeed the united kingdom is one of the most generous funders of most of these organisations and i think it's time we start to look again. you yeah, well i mean you can say that that's right in the political debate, right in the political debate, right isn't the whole right now, isn't it, the whole echr and whether or not echr debate and whether or not we actually need to be party to all of these international treaties, quangos and all the rest of it? >> i mean, how seriously do you think the conservative party has actually this research actually taken this research that the taxpayers alliance have put think they're taking >> i don't think they're taking it all. think it seriously at all. i think they'd rather people didn't know about i think about this. and i think conservative have been very unwilling to admit just how
12:17 am
badly they've lost control over the state. i think the second that the governing party says, hang on, guys, we have no ability to do anything here. we don't what levers to don't know what levers to pull. we don't how to pull them. we don't know how to pull them. but we're giving your but we're giving all of your money people that do know money to people that do know how to pull the levers. it's a very dangerous position for a governing so governing party to be in. so i think they'd rather just sweep it the carpet. think they'd rather just sweep it and the carpet. think they'd rather just sweep it and what:arpet. think they'd rather just sweep it and what are at. think they'd rather just sweep it and what are the labour party >> and what are the labour party saying it? saying on it? >> given they tend >> well, again, given they tend to schmoozing with lot of to like schmoozing with a lot of these global quangocrats, they're much either. they're not saying much either. well, they're not saying much either. weiyeah. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> benjamin, you quite like schmoozing with these people, don't love a freebie, but, >> well, i love a freebie, but, you doesn't have to be you know, it doesn't have to be from a quango. i'll take i'll take that from lot people. take that from a lot of people. i very odd. you get this i find it very odd. you get this a lot from from people that are anti you get from anti eu. you get this from people that go on about these global organisations, whether it's the united nations, the world forum, sort world economic forum, this sort of, know, idea that of, you know, paranoid idea that they're all out you and they're all out to get you and ruin your which i think ruin your lives, which i think is ridiculous. but anybody knows in their normal to day life in their normal day to day life that are stronger in a team that you are stronger in a team than are being isolated,
12:18 am
than you are being isolated, shouting there. shouting at people over there. and got these and so when you've got these global organisations where experts governmental leaders experts and governmental leaders come and they pull come together and they pull ideas, they try and solve problems that you can copy and paste across different countries and pull the knowledge together. i think that is a very sensible idea and anyone in our day to day lives would see that that's a rational way to lead, not how it works in practice though, but you talk about the fact you also talk about the fact that more funding to it. that we give more funding to it. well, think britain well, actually, i think britain should it should be a superpower. it should be a superpower. it should be a superpower. it should be influential that we do have moral ethical have good moral and ethical ideas world should ideas about how the world should run. i would rather that we run. and i would rather that we use the money that we have to hold that influence. because i tell what, if we weren't tell you what, if we weren't putting any putting we don't hold any influence. weren't putting influence. if we weren't putting money quangos , we money into those quangos, we don't any door open don't hold any of the door open to and i'm sick people to china. and i'm sick of people like already these like china already control these organs nations. >> they control them the >> they control them from the inside. back out. absolutely >> this this is actually the point, isn't it, that, you know, these organisations sapping point, isn't it, that, you know, these yaway sations sapping point, isn't it, that, you know, these away from is sapping point, isn't it, that, you know, these away from us. sapping point, isn't it, that, you know, these away from us. youapping point, isn't it, that, you know, these away from us. you know, power away from us. you know, this imagery of our politicians pulling on levers and not being
12:19 am
able to make any kind of difference at all, you know, i think people don't understand what these organisations, organisations you often organisations are. you often hean organisations are. you often hear, you know, the un this or you hear about these international organisations, but most people don't have any understanding of actually what their political legitimacy is. and actually, particularly if you're coming at this from a liberal point of view you're liberal point of view and you're talking about political legitimacy, what political legitimacy, what political legitimacy do these organisations don't . organisations have? they don't. and i think that people would be very, by the very, very surprised by the findings that the epa have pulled together because it's a shocking amount of money, £85 billion between 2009 and £25 billion between 2009 and £25 billion forks of your money. >> that's been splashed. >> that's been splashed. >> you talked over the timeframe . what was the time frame? >> 2009 to 2021. right. >> 2009 to 2021. right. >> so that's quite a long time as a shocking, shocking amount >> a shocking, shocking amount of you i mean, of money, i think you i mean, regardless the billion quid, regardless of the billion quid, you see, we're talking you see, we're still talking about enough a cut to income tax every with every year over that period with some change. >> that's ridiculous argument because, that's like
12:20 am
because, you know, that's like that's people that that's like those people that claimed lose money by claimed that we lose money by being part the eu. well, being a part of the eu. well, i'll tell you what, our economy has worse when we has done much worse when we don't the kind of trading don't have the kind of trading setup that did. setup that we did. >> as like to see when we >> as i'd like to see when we had a debate. >> we recognise that quangos >> but we recognise that quangos are issue within are a serious issue within democracies they, they, democracies because they, they, they hold power that isn't democratically they hold power that isn't dem would ally they hold power that isn't dem would that also be the why would that not also be the case international quangos case for international quangos that also illegitimate hold power that influences us and also that the british public are generally not aware of because it's not something that is part of the public discussion. >> and chloe, mean, i wonder >> and chloe, i mean, i wonder if you've any thoughts on, you know, benjamin speaks glowingly about the un, example. about the un, for example. i don't know you, when don't know about you, but when the ayatollah , for example, is the ayatollah, for example, is a chairing some un body and we're being lectured about human rights in britain, i say sod off, frankly, you're talking out your bottom. >> yeah, exactly. >> yeah, exactly. >> i mean, benjamin, you've said, oh, it's great if we can all come together and come up with rules that we can copy paste as you said, across all
12:21 am
different countries, we can't just a one size fits all just have a one size fits all approach countries. and just have a one size fits all aijmma countries. and just have a one size fits all aijmma has countries. and just have a one size fits all aijmma has quite ntries. and just have a one size fits all aijmma has quite franklyind as emma has quite frankly pointed out, they have absolutely legitimacy . yes, absolutely no legitimacy. yes, we need to have good relationships with other countries. yes, we have to have trade agreements and so on. but countries. yes, we have to have trarreallyzements and so on. but countries. yes, we have to have trarreally should; and so on. but countries. yes, we have to have trarreally should minimise n. but countries. yes, we have to have trarreally should minimise thith we really should minimise this international bureaucracy which has power whatsoever, just as has no power whatsoever, just as with the eu debate , a lot of with the eu debate, a lot of people have tried to narrow it to, down oh, how much money are we saving? it's not about money, it's about legitimacy. i mean, it's about legitimacy. i mean, it's completely undemocratic to give people more more give these people more and more power . power. >> em- power. >> sat there nodding >> you all sat there nodding along. you have it both along. you can't have it both ways. say it's so ways. you can't say it's so powerful that it's controlling our and then saying it's our lives and then saying it's got it doesn't do got no power, it doesn't do anything. do we give the anything. why do we give the money to it? >> has power? no, it has >> so it has power? no, it has no democratic legitimate power. >> the point. >> that's the point. >> that's the point. >> truth that we've not >> the truth is that we've not earned power, which all countries agree to, solve countries can agree to, to solve problems, to live in international laws these international laws and these bodies international laws and these bocand i'd rather that than the >> and i'd rather that than the kind of world had 150 years ago. >> all right. still to come tonight, is it time scrap the
12:22 am
12:25 am
get to cook, you're listening to gb news radio . gb news radio. >> welcome back to the saturday five, as always , cheers very five, as always, cheers very much for your emails about tonight's topics. >> jessica's written in and jessica says , if you were king jessica says, if you were king charles, you wouldn't want to sit on a flight with rishi sunak and david cameron for seven hours either. well, yeah , hours either. well, yeah, jessica, you've got a point. but actually , rishi sunak and david actually, rishi sunak and david cameron were on separate flights. peter says , i'm not flights. peter says, i'm not defending or necessarily supporting them. the king, the sunak and cameron. but the reason for separate planes will presumably be the same as for the royal family if a plane goes
12:26 am
down, one wouldn't want them all on the same one maybe. correct right, folks, time for our next debate. keep your emails coming in. up next, it's emma. emma, tell us what's caught your eye this week . this week. >> thanks, darren. so unfortunate . this is not a very unfortunate. this is not a very upbeat story . my unfortunate. this is not a very upbeat story. my home unfortunate. this is not a very upbeat story . my home turf, the upbeat story. my home turf, the london borough of havering, the council there has made firstly made the decision to cancel their hanukkah celebration this year and then under pressure , year and then under pressure, did a u—turn and are now going to have the hanukkah celebrations still . and the celebrations still. and the reason why they chose to do this in the first place was because they were concerned about community tensions. now, havering a part of london havering isn't a part of london that has a particularly large muslim population, they were muslim population, but they were obviously concerned that allowing to celebrate one allowing jews to celebrate one of their important holidays of their most important holidays was to inflame community was going to inflame community tensions . and we've seen the tensions. and we've seen the police doing a similar thing dunng police doing a similar thing during the protests over the last couple of weeks. we saw the met police officers tearing down
12:27 am
hostage posters because they were also concerned about community tensions and we've seen it in the two tier policing. we've seen it in the police focusing their attentions on the campaign against anti—semitism, telling them to turn off their billboard campaign that was attached to the side of vans and asking them to leave the area rather than focusing on those who were the potential aggressors and actually policing those who were shouting, calling for jihad actually policing those who were shouting, calling forjihad in shouting, calling for jihad in our streets. so i think that this really shows how fundamentally, morally bankrupt we've become, because i don't think that the london borough of havering did this because they had any sort of malign intent. i think that they were just resonating with this cowardly zeitgeist that immediately kowtows to any imagined, not even real image and concerns about offending someone , about offending someone, particularly the islamic community. and we're seeing this across the board. we're seeing this also at the moment in ireland. we saw the return of
12:28 am
some hostages this week, including emily hands, who is an irish citizen, dual israeli irish citizen, dual israeli irish citizen, dual israeli irish citizen and leo varadkar, referring to her as lost and then found rather than saying that she was taken hostage by a terrorist organisation . we have terrorist organisation. we have a serious problem in this country and i think that the british public can see how morally perverse this is . i am morally perverse this is. i am sick of this. i know that many people who are watching this show now, the view, the viewers will be looking at all of this and are frankly sick of it and have had enough. and frankly , i have had enough. and frankly, i think we really need to put our foot down because this is going to become a real problem for us if don't something about if we don't do something about it. i assume benjamin it. now i assume benjamin butterworth, are you going to tell him a web that she's some kind of swivel eyed bigot for thinking that this is a step too far? >> i'm pretty much every other topic i would because, you know, >> i'm pretty much every other topic i you.d because, you know, >> i'm pretty much every other topic i you are.ecause, you know, >> i'm pretty much every other topic i you are. but;e, you know, >> i'm pretty much every other topic i you are. but actually, row, >> i'm pretty much every other topic i you are. but actually, you emma, you are. but actually, you know, there's clearly a very good point here, which is one of the the council said when
12:29 am
the things the council said when they about why they they talked about why they weren't to do this public weren't going to do this public celebration of hanukkah was that they violence they were worried about violence and i couldn't help but think violence from who you i don't think the jewish people were going to go out or, you know, maybe israelis that might live in part of the world. they in that part of the world. they weren't going to go out and fight scream and shout. fight and scream and shout. we've that the last we've not seen that in the last 6 7 weeks, have we? and it 6 or 7 weeks, have we? and it would be the people who are anti—semites that they were worried being violent and worried about being violent and aggressive expressing . aggressive and expressing. >> concerned about >> they were concerned about offending . offending anti—semites. >> and the idea that you >> and so the idea that you don't do an event representing a part of that community because you think the bigots might get loud and vocal is an appalling reflection on that council's judgement. >> you know, you've made a mistake when you and i agree with each other. >> you both agree then that actually this would not happen for any other religion , that it for any other religion, that it is actually isolated to the jews i >> -- >> well, actually, if you look at the way that people have been responding and downplaying what
12:30 am
has to israeli has happened to israeli citizens, with the citizens, particularly with the rape women, it's like rape of israeli women, it's like hashtag believer women, except when they're jews , they are when they're jews, they are unwilling to accept the most bafic unwilling to accept the most basic evidence put before their eyes. and it shows that this is this is anti—semitism . this is this is anti—semitism. this is the old hatred coming back to haunt us. and it is so morally perverse that people would count out it, because you're right, benjamin, they are worried about offending anti—semites. and you have about the numbers here. >> look, first of all, far from everyone on those marches for palestine is an anti—semite. there reasonable there are plenty of reasonable people. course there are. but people. of course there are. but for proportion, were for proportion, there were 300,000 people on the last march, which is more than the entire population entire jewish population of britain . and that's what britain. and that's what happens. are so loud so happens. they are so loud and so vocal that the jewish people are not getting a chance to have their truth heard. and that's when you get councils that are pathetic enough to ban a celebration of a jewish festival because they're intimidated.
12:31 am
>> and when you look at the black matter protests as black lives matter protests as well in the well, nobody is out in the streets holding up photographs of bibas , who's the ten month of bibas, who's the ten month old baby who has been murdered by hamas along with his his four year old brother and his mother. when we saw people marching in the streets saying, say his name, say his name about george floyd, not doing that floyd, people are not doing that for and it's because he's for fear. and it's because he's a jewish baby. >> yeah, people are just so selective what kind of selective about what kind of violence it's violence they care about. it's almost people almost as if people have completely forgotten just completely forgotten and just brushed what brushed under the carpet. what happened on october 7th. they're only what's only interested in what's happening the moment. happening in gaza at the moment. but, back to but, you know, going back to what council have done, i what the council have done, i think really dangerous think it's a really dangerous slippery we're going slippery slope that we're going down rather than down now, if rather than punishing the people who cause violence and are anti—semitic, we punish the jews, we punish the people who just because you're not liked and you're the one provoking violence, you're the one that should be punished. i mean, that's completely insane. i mean, elliot, how would you feel? >> you know, looking at the >> you know, in looking at the state of london now , it's
12:32 am
state of london now, it's incredibly concerning. >> and i think it's essentially inevitable result of multiculturalism , where you multiculturalism, where you don't emphasise the need to cohere around a single set of values and a single idea, and instead you end up breaking off into cantons and that always generates hate, that always generates hate, that always generates conflict. and i think it's a big problem that has been evolving for many years. >> yeah, we've got a real problem, i think actually problem, but i think actually finally starting to have a finally we're starting to have a conversation that's conversation about it. that's the one good thing would the one good thing i would say. >> also, you know, you see >> but also, you know, you see so of indicative so many sort of indicative gestures that happen here. so, for you saw for example, you saw a university refuse to play university team refuse to play the jewish society in a sports match. a friend of mine who is jewish, he sent me text messages of one of his relatives who's obviously also jewish and their business. they've taken the business. they've taken the business. they've taken the business. they were going to give away because they found give her away because they found out she was jewish and they meant reflection on meant that as a reflection on what's on in israel and what's going on in israel and gaza. i tell you what, all gaza. well, i tell you what, all those people it achieves nothing. of all, that's
12:33 am
nothing. first of all, that's often racism. but you often just racism. but if you care so much, perfectly reasonably the plight of reasonably about the plight of the palestinian people, as well as israelis as the plight of israelis actions like that in britain are not going to do anything. netanyahu or any of the leaders of hamas are not sat there thinking, oh, i can't believe janet in peterborough did that. they care about they they don't care about you. they don't about their own people. >> in the case of hamas, it's a good and i don't say that good point. and i don't say that often, still often, but folks still ahead, should make nigel, should we make like nigel, should we make like nigel, should we make like nigel, should we australia and should we head to australia and should we head to australia and should nick their health care should we nick their health care system involved are the system? and how involved are the sussexes with omid scobie sussexes with this? omid scobie chap you're with the saturday five live on .
12:36 am
12:37 am
you've highlighted this. emma. praise indeed. havering council should be reprimanded for cancelling this in the first place, says eloise has written in. eloise says it's worth noting the amazing response from the muslim association , who the muslim association, who described it as offensive to our jewish brothers and sisters and offered to help steward events for hanukkah, providing extra security if needed . hm. security if needed. hm. interesting now it's time for our next debate. up next, it's chloe making her debut. chloe, what's been on your mind this week? well al, i'm pretty fed up of the nhs . of the nhs. >> it is time to scrap the traditional nhs model . it's so traditional nhs model. it's so bad that even labour are finally realising that it needs to change. until now, the nhs has seemed almost untouched . until seemed almost untouched. until dunng seemed almost untouched. until during covid. this became rampant . the nhs became some rampant. the nhs became some sort of religion cult with everyone out clapping for their nhs heroes and every business virtue signalling with thank you nhs signs in their windows. but
12:38 am
people have had enough now and the narrative is finally starting to change. the brits have had enough of waiting forever just to get have had enough of waiting foreverjust to get a gp appointment. they're fed up of seeing loved ones pass away. sadly, far too early because of nhs failings. last winter, the average wait time for an urgent ambulance call went over 90 minutes. that is more than five times the target time. absolutely unacceptable . well. absolutely unacceptable. well. so the model needs to change. it's not working and labour are finally catching on. wes streeting went and made a visit to australia to try and learn some lessons from the australian model and why wouldn't you be interested in the model of a country where even though they spend a smaller percentage of their gdp on health care than us, they have a life expectancy eight years longer than ours ? so eight years longer than ours? so what did the australians get so right? well they have a public health insurance system called medicare . now, medicare don't
12:39 am
medicare. now, medicare don't run any of the hospitals . they run any of the hospitals. they have private contracts where they bring in people who are actually better at doing the jobs. and what is the best thing about this? not only is the free health care much better than the uk's, but they incentive buys you to switch over to even better private insurance . yes, better private insurance. yes, that's right. they give you a tax rebate if you switch to a private provider, which makes sense. why should you pay twice for taking more pressure off the pubuc for taking more pressure off the public system ? so throwing more public system? so throwing more and more money into a broken nhs system simply is not going to fix the problem. it is time for change. and if wes streeting, the shadow health secretary, is serious about listening to the australians, we may well get the change we need under labour. i don't care which party does it, but i want to see the nhs system scrapped . scrapped. >> i mean, elliot, you've done a fair bit of research on this very issue at the taxpayers alliance and talking about all the whakaari walkeri that the whakaari and walkeri that we spent. knows on in spent. god knows how much on in the nhs itself appeasing people like benjamin instead of
12:40 am
actually, know , looking actually, you know, looking at patient and all the patient outcomes and all the rest of it. so do you have any sense of optimism that labour will sort of grasp the issue? >> not particularly. i think the easy solution for any government is just to hike easy solution for any government isjust to hike up easy solution for any government is just to hike up the stealth taxes. that's exactly what we saw under the brown and blair era to hike up those stealth taxes, bring more and taxes, bring in more money and throw at nhs throw enough money at the nhs that you'll put a great big sticking plaster on it and it will stem the bleeding and it will stem the bleeding and it will stop the issues for a very short amount of time before inevitably a conservative government comes back and has government comes back in and has to up the inevitable issues. to mop up the inevitable issues. >> yes, the term thinking, >> yes, the short term thinking, gruesome, gruesome and appropriate imagery. >> it is. i mean, benjamin, you must be delighted with the state of nhs in wales. of the nhs in wales. >> look, first of all, under laboun >> look, first of all, under labour, the approval of the nhs was much higher, the highest on record since it was founded . the record since it was founded. the waiting times were much lower , waiting times were much lower, the outcomes were much better. >> what are they in wales? >> what are they in wales? >> well, i'm sure you're going to tell us, so why don't you go?
12:41 am
well, they're higher than they are in england. the fact is that when labour ran the nhs, it did much better. >> if you throw enough money at a problem, you can temporarily >> if you throw enough money at a prolit.m, you can temporarily solve it. >> just incredibly >> that's just incredibly patronising people patronising to say that people don't want their taxes to be used a better health care used on a better health care system. they absolutely do. and we constant in polling. we see that constant in polling. chloe australian care >> the australian health care system much cheaper. it's 9% system is much cheaper. it's 9% of compared 11. i of gdp compared to 11. but i tell you we consistent, we tell you what, we consistent, we have one of the most expensive systems of the systems with some of the absolute outcomes absolute worst outcomes comparable a poor comparable to really a poor eastern country. eastern european country. >> those outcomes so >> and those outcomes weren't so bad 13 years ago. the fact is that we've such a mess in that we've got such a mess in the and one of the reasons the nhs and one of the reasons we we need more money in we have we need more money in the is because of a the nhs is because of a demographic change that you can't have can't escape. we have a significantly greater proportion can't escape. we have a sigthe cantly greater proportion can't escape. we have a sigthe population er proportion can't escape. we have a sigthe population who oportion can't escape. we have a sigthe population who are rtion of the population who are pensioners health pensioners who have more health care frankly i'm care problems and frankly i'm sick pensioners not paying sick of pensioners not paying for benjamin coming for it. benjamin what's coming out mouth sounds like out of your mouth sounds like something pmqs, where out of your mouth sounds like somethelg pmqs, where out of your mouth sounds like somethe parties, pmqs, where out of your mouth sounds like somethe parties, rather, where out of your mouth sounds like somethe parties, rather than re both the parties, rather than pensioners, the nhs. pensioners, did pay for the nhs. >> you very much. in >> thank you very much. in spending their spending and paying their goddamn amount of
12:42 am
goddamn taxes. the amount of taxes they paid wasn't expecting them a pensioner 30 them to be a pensioner for 30 years didn't expect years because they didn't expect you invite half the world to you to invite half the world to come to britain. >> this what the left used to >> this is what the left used to be in the nhs. >> our nhs would be on its knees without labour. without migrant labour. but i don't want to interrupt. >> what you're doing. >> looking backwards, saying, oh , under tories. , it's worse under the tories. it bit better under it was a bit better under laboun it was a bit better under labour. is just typical pmqs labour. it is just typical pmqs rhetoric rather than actually looking and looking for solutions and improvements change. you're improvements and change. you're just for ways to slam just looking for ways to slam the other party. let's look forward, find a solution and make it better. i want to see politicians who have got backbone and are willing to take a risk to try something innovative different. chloe a risk to try something inn(gotten different. chloe a risk to try something inn(gotten badferent. chloe a risk to try something inn(gotten bad .erent. chloe a risk to try something inn(gotten bad . we'vezhloe a risk to try something inn(gotten bad . we've got; a risk to try something inn(gotten bad . we've got to it's gotten so bad. we've got to try something else. >> has a real important >> chloe has a real important point there. >> which >> emma, which is saying that the public are fed up. the pubuc the public are fed up. the public are looking at this and thinking all of thinking we're paying all of this half of my taxes this money, half of my taxes essentially going every essentially are going out every single month, and what are we getting? >> so many of us are paying double. i actually had a private appointment earlier today and i had to pay a small fortune for
12:43 am
it. but i'm also paying for the nhs and there are many people who were turning to private health care because they don't want 18 months year, want to wait. 18 months a year, two years, years or two years, three years or however years it takes to however many years it takes to get operation. get a hip operation. >> so, said, do you >> so, as chloe said, do you think you should get tax think you should get a tax rebate for that? >> i think it's not a bad idea, but i what we need is more but i think what we need is more fundamental reform, because even if is right and it was if benjamin is right and it was better labour, it's better under labour, it's because they were government better under labour, it's beylong they were government better under labour, it's beylong thejthat'e government better under labour, it's beylong thejthat it's government better under labour, it's beylong thejthat it's just ernment so long ago that it's just gradual decline. so long ago that it's just gradjust decline. so long ago that it's just gradjust the decline. so long ago that it's just gradjust the canine. so long ago that it's just gradjust the can down this just kicking the can down the road. everybody obe everybody. anyone everybody. ask anyone in the street has an street. everyone has had an experience , whether it's experience, whether it's themselves or with a loved one, of how absolutely awful the nhs is. it needs radical reform and i'm no fan of labour. i'm no fan of wes streeting, but the idea of wes streeting, but the idea of going and actually put setting aside this hubris that we've the health care we've got the best health care system the world and actually system in the world and actually going out looking at who's going out and looking at who's doing better learning doing it better and learning from is absolutely the from them is absolutely the right do. do believe right thing to do. do i believe that a labour government would actually able to execute actually be able to execute these no i don't. but these plans? no i don't. but i do think i think that they
12:44 am
do think i do think that they might it easier to have the might find it easier to have the political will execute those political will to execute those plans it's not. are the plans because it's not. are the evil want to privatise evil tories want to privatise the ? the nhs? >> it the last labour >> it was the last labour government, particularly the 2 or 3 blair governments who brought in private sector brought in the private sector into and made it more into the nhs and made it more efficient, no efficient, which i have no problem with, provided it's free at of use i don't at the point of use and i don't think you should get a tax rebate for going private. i think you should fix the system as is. as it is. >> think i agree that you >> i think i agree that you should system. i think >> i think i agree that you sho absolutely system. i think >> i think i agree that you sho absolutely finezm. i think >> i think i agree that you sho absolutely fine that think it's absolutely fine that you use taxpayer use use taxpayer money to use private services so that you can clear that backlog. >> that's what happened in 1997 and streeting, and that's what wes streeting, who's the shadow health secretary, to do secretary, has pledged to do again. other thing again. and the only other thing i'd quickly say is i was in south korea recently. no i didn't there. got didn't walk there. i got a plane, but i paid £9. i got i got quite sick when i was there or, you know, a bit sick. and i paid £9 to see a gp in about half an hour's notice. and i couldn't help but think that there's a space in the there's a big space in the market a private sector that market for a private sector that would of prices here. >> imagine that £0.09. it doesn't have to be one or the
12:45 am
other. >> it's not the case that we can just incentivise people to go private and then completely ignore reforming the public system. doing both. >> right. okay >> right. okay >> still omid scobie is >> still ahead, omid scobie is he a grifter or does he have royal the royal connections with the saturday on
12:48 am
gb news? welcome back to the saturday five. right, folks. up next, it's five. right, folks. up next, wsfime five. right, folks. up next, it's time for benjamin . it's time for benjamin. benjamin, what are you going to be talking about this week? >> well, i'm going to be talking about the royals. yeah, we almost made a whole hour on gb news without discussing them. but we now. i've often but here we are now. i've often been the wokeist in been called the wokeist man in britain, which i say, please britain, to which i say, please don't assume gender. so as britain, to which i say, please don�*mightme gender. so as britain, to which i say, please don�*might imagine,ender. so as britain, to which i say, please don�*might imagine, i der. so as britain, to which i say, please don�*might imagine, i always as britain, to which i say, please don�*might imagine, i always felt you might imagine, i always felt a strong affinity with harry and meghan, the duke and duchess of sussex, because i think a lot of what they talk about and their social justice agenda is good what they talk about and their socthe ustice agenda is good what they talk about and their socthe world agenda is good what they talk about and their socthe world and1da is good what they talk about and their socthe world and ita is good
12:49 am
what they talk about and their socthe world and it makes)d what they talk about and their socthe world and it makes me for the world and it makes me proud that they were royals. but even have it with harry even i have lost it with harry and now, this week, omid and meghan. now, this week, omid scobie, who is their mouthpiece, released another book called end game, which i think is about his career. and in a mysterious twist, we found that in the dutch version of this book, it had been translated to include two names that we won't name , two names that we won't name, which are the alleged royal racist who asked about what colour harry and meghan's baby might be and what a nightmare it must be horrible for omid scobie with a book to sell and failing in falling interest that the world was having a row over, these two names published in the dutch translation . and obviously dutch translation. and obviously i don't believe that for a split second. you know, you don't translate it and then add in whole new sentences, naming two of the most famous people on earth. the truth is that we need to stop this double harry to stop this double dutch harry and meghan shouldn't be using their secret mouthpiece of scobie. if they want to name the royal racists have the guts to do it yourself . if now , emma,
12:50 am
do it yourself. if now, emma, are you a fan? >> no. >> no. >> i think the man's a complete grifter. i think you're right. >> describing me or omicron two peasin >> describing me or omicron two peas in a pod . peas in a pod. >> i think that , you know, you >> i think that, you know, you said it yourself. he's a mouthpiece . the reason why mouthpiece. the reason why i think certain people have been named, i think, is because there is a certain agenda behind and attacking those particular people . without naming any names people. without naming any names , i think the whole thing is entirely transparent and it's actually quite pathetic. i think it's quite sad. you said, you know, it's the end game of his career, but what an unfortunate title to choose for book title to choose for a book because it's the end game because it's also the end game for meghan. for harry and meghan. they've got absolutely prospects. got absolutely no prospects. they've themselves they've complete done themselves over they've been so over because they've been so self—indulgent that even the people who like them such as yourself, now completely yourself, are now completely sick them. and think sick of them. and i think actually , i think omid scobie , actually, i think omid scobie, as much as everybody already thought he was a grifter anyway, i actually think he's embarrassed himself. >> i mean, it is very
12:51 am
embarrassing. he says he says , i embarrassing. he says he says, i don't speak dutch, so i can't be sure published the sure what was published in the translation names don't magically appear. >> that's he >> it's just so that's also he denies this, course, but it denies this, of course, but it just seems completely so indecent. >> it's dropping the translator in isn't it? in it, isn't it? >> yeah. and she came out later. yes, exactly. >> said well i don't >> and she said well i don't speak dutch can't . speak dutch so i can't. >> said, she says that the >> she said, she says that the names draft, the names were in the draft, the engush names were in the draft, the english draft. i hope she proves it. she didn't come up with it. >> i mean, how would she know? she lives in rotterdam. it's so it's so obvious. >> the people in question, she would surely. would know, surely. >> child lying, >> it's like a child lying, right? it's so right? because it's so transparent. so maybe. maybe he's honest to drop he's not being honest to drop the it. but surely the translator in it. but surely he's not had plastic surgery . he's not had plastic surgery. >> i think we could all judge that one if it does come out that one if it does come out that he did lie in order to drop the translator, i'm sure the translator, which i'm sure the translator, which i'm sure the translator, which i'm sure the translator be able to the translator would be able to prove, surely that's only prove, then surely that's only going add flames going to add to those flames onune going to add to those flames online and suggesting that he's lying else as well. >> well, yes, indeed. >> well, yes, indeed. >> actually, it throws into >> and actually, it throws into question much this question how much of this book we can trust that maybe
12:52 am
we can actually trust that maybe he believes that he just he believes that he can just sell more books, the more outraged, the more, well, maybe it's case of press is it's the case of all press is good press way things are going in country. going to in this country. we're going to need start burning books need to start burning books to keep warm. keep ourselves warm. >> there's one. >> so there's one. >> so there's one. >> but you know, the king the king suggested in the papers king has suggested in the papers this week that they might break that rule. >> the queen had the late queen that rule. >> soe queen had the late queen that rule. >> so longeen had the late queen that rule. >> so long andiad the late queen that rule. >> so long and they|e late queen that rule. >> so long and they might queen for so long and they might actually sue. they might bring a defamation case. now that's pubuc defamation case. now that's public think that public money. do you think that would justified? would be justified? >> well, it's the money that the monarchy raises then way monarchy raises and then the way that works monarchy that it works is the monarchy then funding to then provides that funding to then provides that funding to the kingdom treasury, the united kingdom treasury, which back a certain portion. >> but do you think that would be all right? monarchy? they should start suing for these kind of things? or where do you draw the line? >> i think for to >> i think it's not for me to judge or not should judge whether or not they should or shouldn't i think the or shouldn't sue. i think the issue suing is it does issue with suing is it does suggest that if they sue, it does that they does suggest that they think that the allegations i.e, that the allegations in le, that the allegations in le, that discussing child's skin that discussing the child's skin colour way the child colour and the way the child will is inherently be a bad will look is inherently be a bad thing do . and i think that
12:53 am
thing to do. and i think that that probably be misjudged i >> -- >> and i m >> and i think if harry and meghan know that the royals are not allowed to take legal action on grounds, i mean, that on any grounds, i mean, that just it's just like an just you know, it's just like an open they can open goal for them. they can just the royals as a just use the royals as a punchbag. well, if they can't take, evidently , take, which they have evidently, of need to have the of course they need to have the power to take legal action, then that doesn't need that doesn't need but in need to be on anything. but in severe where clearly severe cases where clearly they've just been abused and abused over, abused and abused over and over, it's taxpayers money, not it's also taxpayers money, not pubuc it's also taxpayers money, not public money. >> well, indeed, yeah. >> well, indeed, yeah. >> there's no such thing as pubuc >> there's no such thing as public but actually, i public money. but actually, i would they need to would argue that they need to just let these people be as irrelevant they are. irrelevant as they are. completely them be. irrelevant as they are. con go ately them be. irrelevant as they are. con go with them be. irrelevant as they are. con go with her them be. irrelevant as they are. con go with her late them be. irrelevant as they are. con go with her late majesty,e. >> go with her late majesty, i don't think anyone seriously any more. >> scobie shilling. anyway, thanks our guests tonight. thanks to our guests tonight. >> lawyers. it's the brilliant legal with the saturday legal curse with the saturday night . night showdown. >> watching. we'll >> cheers for watching. we'll see you again next week. now though, it's weather with . ellie >> that warm feeling inside from
12:54 am
boxt boilers sponsor layers of weather on . gb news. weather on. gb news. >> hello. welcome to your latest gb news weather. i'm ellie glacier. it was a very cold and frosty start for many of us this morning and there's been quite a few wintry showers across western coasts. these are brought about some occlusion brought about by some occlusion features of western features across parts of western scotland, into scotland, northwest england into wales southwest england to wales and southwest england to quite a bit of snowfall across parts of northwest england with an amber warning in place. an amber snow warning in place. some becoming impassable. some roads becoming impassable. this afternoon, that snow this afternoon, but that snow will gradually to ease will gradually start to ease into this evening . elsewhere, into this evening. elsewhere, though, south, though, further south, those showers continue push in from showers continue to push in from the turning to snow across the west, turning to snow across parts and the pennines parts of wales and the pennines as well, could up as well, where we could see up to through to ten centimetres through sunday . another chilly sunday morning. another chilly night uk. but perhaps night across the uk. but perhaps just touch milder across the just a touch milder across the very far south. so a milder start the south, but start across the south, but a much showery much cloudier and showery picture . two showers continue to picture. two showers continue to pushin picture. two showers continue to push in from the west. and with those cold temperatures, perhaps bringing stretches bringing some icy stretches through morning . for through sunday morning. and for
12:55 am
scotland, it will be scotland, though, it will be a much drier and brighter day. plenty of sunshine and blue sky around into afternoon, around into the afternoon, but still cool cold still feeling cool and cold despite that sunshine minus one in places . further south, in some places. further south, a milder picture, but a little bit windier, too, with winds coming up southwest. monday up from the southwest. monday starts a wet picture for many with hill snow across parts of wales into the south of the pennines as well. but that will eventually its way eventually clear its way south and eastwards go through and eastwards as we go through the day on monday. further north across scotland, northern england, a drier picture, plenty of but that of sunshine around, but that rain and cloud slowly clearing of sunshine around, but that rain anisouthd slowly clearing of sunshine around, but that rain anisouth andywly clearing of sunshine around, but that rain anisouth and eastwardsig its way south and eastwards through leaving a drier through monday, leaving a drier and brighter colder for and brighter but colder day for many wednesday . many on tuesday and wednesday. >> like things are heating >> looks like things are heating up. boxt boilers as sponsors of weather on .
26 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
TV-GBN Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on