tv Headliners GB News September 9, 2024 2:00am-3:00am BST
2:00 am
home well as elba and the home secretary, yvette cooper, ministers have already taken steps to ban so—called ninja swords and plan to strengthen the laws around the online sales of knives . in other news, today of knives. in other news, today has marked two years since the passing of britain's longest reigning monarch, queen elizabeth the second. she was on the throne for 70 years and was beloved by the nation and around the world. earlier today, the king and queen attended crathie kirk church near balmoral, where the late queen was a regular worshipper. they were there for a sunday service with prayer and remembrance of his late mother, who passed at the age of 96. the prime minister has hit out at the previous government this morning, saying the nhs has been broken in ways that he called unforgivable. these comments come as a labour commissioned review into how children are treated by the nhs is due to be published in the coming week. health secretary wes streeting set out labour's plan to tackle the nhs crisis. >> former gender is about is
2:01 am
about three big shifts out of hospital into the community, so we get the gp appointments that people need, the social care that people need, care closer to people's homes, better for patients, better for value taxpayers. it's a shift from analogue to digital, so we're not working with outdated systems and allowing the waste in the nhs to go unchallenged. and then thirdly, from sickness to prevention, making sure we're supporting people not just to live longer, but to live well for longer through good public health and prevention measures. those are the pillars of labour's reform agenda , and labour's reform agenda, and great britain finished runners up in the paris paralympic medal table following a total haul of 124. >> the figure second only to china. comprised of 49 gold, 44 silver and 31 bronze, with gb securing titles in 18 of the 19 sports entered. britain ended today with two more golds and two silvers. his majesty the king earlier sent his heartfelt
2:02 am
congratulations to paralympics gb and commonwealth athletes for their numerous success at the paris games . and those are the paris games. and those are the latest gb news headlines. for now i'm tatiana sanchez. now it's now i'm tatiana sanchez. now wsfime now i'm tatiana sanchez. now it's time for headlines for the very latest gb news direct to your smartphone, sign up to news alerts by scanning the qr code, or go to gbnews.com. >> forward slash alerts . >> forward slash alerts. >> forward slash alerts. >> hello and welcome to headliners. this is your first look at monday's newspapers with three comedians. i'm cressida watson and tonight i'm playing gooseberry to two headliners favourites the people's game and paul cox and his on screen sweetheart louis shaffer. how oh my oh god . my oh god. >> with tongues. >> with tongues. >> lovely. >> lovely. >> keep it clean guys . this goes >> keep it clean guys. this goes out at breakfast time. you're right. i did encourage that. yes. how are you both.7 great. >> do you know what.7 today i had
2:03 am
the best burger i've ever had. right? | the best burger i've ever had. right? i got recognised at a mobile food truck. yeah. naughty but nice. naughty but nice in aldershot. i'm telling you, alfie and the boys. >> what made it so good that you. >> honestly, i got recognised. so that was it. that's all that mattered. yeah but why no discount though, alfie? >> come on, mate, why do i think every burger you've ever had is the best burger? >> how rude, how rude. okay, right. that's enough of that. let's have a look at the front pages. the telegraph leads with nhs in decline for first time in 50 years. the daily mail has. labour said cutting oap winter fuel cash could kill 4000 express thing of winter fuel payments was cruel, planned betrayal and the times has starmer to give fuel. rebels short shrift. guardian has scores of mps could refuse to back starmer over cuts in fuel payments . and finally the daily payments. and finally the daily star, br and those were your front pages . okay, let's have a
2:04 am
front pages. okay, let's have a look at the front pages , look at the front pages, starting with the daily mail. paul >> the daily mail. paul >> the daily mail . labour said >> the daily mail. labour said cutting oap winter fuel could kill 4000 people, so thousands of pensioners could die if the winter fuel payments are cut . winter fuel payments are cut. according to labour's own research, this is from 2017, when there was a threat that the tories may do exactly what the labour party are going to do this winter. and of course, this comes and bites them on the bottom, doesn't it? because it will inevitably cause problems now. winter will kill old people anyway , sadly, and we are going anyway, sadly, and we are going to have fuel poverty this winter. and the moment we do, labour will be held accountable. >> this was always going to happen, wasn't it? not the 2017 research coming back to haunt them? that's quite exciting. front page news. but lewis, there was always going to be somebody that died over winter and it would get blamed on the fuel. yeah. >> so this is i mean probably
2:05 am
this this is the kind of headune this this is the kind of headline you could put in anything could kill 100,000 or1 million. you know, it's just a lie. i mean, the fact is, and as if, as if labour cares about old people dying, they were gung ho behind the whole covid thing. can i say that this is pre—covid? >> this is 2017. they were doing their own research. >> i know, but but are they going to do something about this now? the fact is, is that they gave out this money when people had money. i don't remember when they gave out, but they've been going on for like at least ten years or whatever. they've given out this money and people and the government doesn't have. even labour government doesn't have the money to do this. so why should old people like me get £500 for duke lewis? >> come on, it's going to the unions, the train drivers. it's not that there's no money at all. it's about choices, isn't it? no. >> it's people who are over. they have to be an old age pensioners. so they're not necessarily, you know, they're going to be over 66 years old or 68 years old. i mean, i understood some of what lewis said. >> i don't agree with any of it playing into their hands. the thing the thing is, okay, this
2:06 am
this is just poor politics from laboun this is just poor politics from labour. they the thing is, if you're going to impact 80, 90% of elderly people this winter to save 1.4 billion, you better make sure that you spend that money on something wise and something that actually benefits probably the people that you're going to harm. i don't think any of the policies that we've seen from labour are going to benefit old people, they dismiss old people at will. see you later. they concentrate on things like anything other than old people. they concentrate on the future, for instance, because they think they're going to save the planet with this money. of course they're not. they think they're going to save the nhs with this money. of course they're not. they're going to waste this money on vanity projects. >> are you saying that this because old people tend to be like white people, that this is racist? what >> yeah. i don't think i am, lewis. i don't , but that's lewis. i don't, but that's that's what you're saying. >> you're saying is what you're saying. >> i think you're saying people change their race with age .
2:07 am
extraordinary. >> no, they don't change. but but there's now 20 million young people who are. >> it's time for the times. lewis. >> did you see the look that i just got? it was unbelievable. anyway, hey, this is the time. sendin anyway, hey, this is the time. send in the clowns, send in the clowns to help children heal quickly. it's saying that that there are people who are in the kids who are in the hospital with pneumonia, and they basically scared them to health by bringing in a clown. basically scared them to health by bringing in a clown . and by bringing in a clown. and clowns made them stay less up to like, 40, 50% less time in the hospital. >> this also sounds like a story you've just made up. it sounds like that. >> but this. but this was in is that. don't laugh. this is serious. this is how serious this is. >> this is serious. this is the solution to the nhs. is clowns brilliant? >> yeah, well, it's also it's also saying that this took place in israel and, you know, people are not that happy with what israel is doing. and so in a way, israel is joking with people who have pneumonia. meanwhile, there are other people who are not being joked with finished it.
2:08 am
>> he finished it. i don't know what it meant, but he finished it. what i one thing i would say is clowns are anti—comedy. if no matter how ill laughter is the best medicine, i think we can all agree with that. >> doctor lewis certainly would know it isn't the best medicine. >> okay. >> okay. >> contrarian sausage. but this is not going to help anyone, is it? no wonder people left hospital early if a clown came in. no matter how much pain you're in, you say, do you know what? i'll sort myself out at home. >> that's my initial feeling, paul >> that's my initial feeling, paul. i mean, i know there have been studies that look at things like healing touch. you know, that thing where they don't actually touch the person, they just put their hands near them? yeah transfer energy. and apparently that gets sounds like an excuse in court. i can't believe people think it's real, but it's a real thing. and apparently it produces better recovery rates. is it to do with attention? you like attention, lewis? this is about that. >> it could be that . >> it could be that. >> it could be that. >> or it could be. it could be the ronald reagan joke that i saw on on youtube or twitter or whatever, or whatever it is, where where ronald reagan, where a guy is driving his horse and he's driving into town with his with his wife and his and his food and whatever, and as a
2:09 am
horse cart and a car, a car hits him and kills and kills the and kills the. and they're in a mess, right. or whatever. he doesn't kill the animal. and so the man comes over and the and the man comes over and the and the man. oh my god, this is going to be too for long the story. >> it's already way too long to get to the end. >> the end is the end is the cop comes over, the cop comes over and asks the man, are you hurt? and the man who was driving the car says, no, i'm not hurt. i'm feeling fine. and they asked him in court, well, why did you say you were feeling fine when you were severely not hurt? and the man said, well, the policeman went over to my horse and i saw him shoot the horse and went over to the cows that were in the back and shoot the cows dead. so when he came to me and asked me how i was feeling , this asked me how i was feeling, this is a ronald reagan. he told me , is a ronald reagan. he told me, a professional comedian. >> why is that funny? >> why is that funny? >> that's not funny. >> that's not funny. >> follow him on twitter. >> follow him on twitter. >> okay, i'll bring you in. the
2:10 am
clowns. let's go. let's go back to paul with the front page of the telegraph. how am i supposed to do these stories with him? >> an nhs in decline for the first time in 50 years. which is brilliant, isn't it? because they're saying it's good news. it's saying that the nhs is no longer it's no longerjust bad. longer it's no longer just bad. it's progressing backwards, which is great. i hope it gets to about 1985, which was the last time i saw my bloody doctor. >> is that true? it's ridiculous, isn't it? >> well, no it isn't obviously. obviously i've been kept alive by medical science is basically a news story. >> he was lying to the people and then he didn't go to the doctor. in 1945. whether it's obviously because people are getting more and more unhealthy because they're eating carbs, they're eating sugar, they're eating plants, they should just stop eating plants. you want to be healthy. you want to save the nhs. you want to save your own life. you want to fight for team britain to be strong for britain. yeah. of course the nhs is getting worse. people are getting more and more unhealthy as team world pushes this whole soy based garbage. >> you definitely read that one,
2:11 am
louis. let's finish up with the daily star, please. >> louis is the daily star. the daily star. there goes summer's floods give way to an autumn freeze. br br. it shows people being cold. why is it getting colder? is it global cooling? is it the climate change? no, it's september, which is generally cooler than august. and october will be cooler than september. it's fall. or what do you call it? >> can you have been here 20 years and you still think that the seasons will happen in the right order? >> they generally do. there's not much of a change in this country. it's miserable. it's very cold. but that's that's just the people . the people are just the people. the people are the people are enduring stuff. >> louis. >> louis. >> well, because they know it's not a warm country . it takes not a warm country. it takes a long time. >> it's not been warm to you. i think you've met a lot of frosty receptions from people. >> everybody is usually his jokes that do it. do it. yeah. >> no, they didn't like me in new york either. but the truth is that it takes a while to get to know these. but one thing once english people like you,
2:12 am
they really like you. that's what's great about them. they really like you. >> well, i look forward to that. paul >> well, i look forward to that. paul, any thoughts on the weather? >> well, the weather, you know, it's outside and it's outside. that's the thing about the weather. it's always outside. i don't think the fact it's going to get a bit cooler in september andifs to get a bit cooler in september and it's rain most of the summer, it feels like we could basically we could cut this now and just play it again next september and it will be just as relevant. there is, you know, that's what i'm saying. >> that's what i've said. i've said it's irrelevant. >> he said it would be just as relevant, which is irrelevant. >> this is the daily star, which is and it's got fins have come up with this. have some respect. aman, aman, aman, aman. what's his name? eamonn holmes, which is our guy. he's made the front page. he's got a he's 64 years old. he's in a wheelchair. look at how great i look. he's a lovely guy. i've never met him , lovely guy. i've never met him, but he's on in the morning. we're on at night. >> he is on in the morning, so maybe he's not going to hear this, but he's got a 42 year old he might do now, mate. 42 years. he's having a lovely holiday. okay, that's the front pages. look at join us after the break. for keir starmer becoming less
2:16 am
soon. welcome back to headliners, your first look at monday's top stories with me. cressida wetton still joined by the meat feast thatis still joined by the meat feast that is the people's game and paul cox and the people's silly sausage. lewis schaffer nice, i like that that's better . like that that's better. >> that's silly sausage. >> that's silly sausage. >> beginning with monday's telegraph, there was a time when we thought keir starmer didn't know what a woman is. it turns out he just doesn't think it matters. >> paul, that's so true, cressida. labour won't close biological sex loophole in equality act. so the government will not carry out forward plans to rewrite the equality act of 2010 that were aimed at protecting single—sex spaces. so this is the minister for women and equalities has confirmed this, ironically, for and those who don't know, obviously the tories plan to rewrite the act in order to clear make it clear that sex in the legislation
2:17 am
means biological sex instead of genden means biological sex instead of gender, which a person identifies. so they're not going to clear this up. they're going to clear this up. they're going to keep it as open and as vague as possible to allow people to do what they like, essentially. and, you know, it's on brand, isn't it? well, it certainly is. and they've taken anything that they disliked. it for me, it smacks of a government that have never governed before. each policy just seems like a knee jerk reaction . there seems to jerk reaction. there seems to always be a target group. there's someone. it's always very binary. ironically, there's always a group that they like and a group they don't like. they will attack from the position of the group that they like, the group that they don't like. and for me, this is i know you disagree, lewis, because that's professionally what you do. but for me, this is exactly what's going on here. i think it's really important that we ring fence, ring fence sex and identify what sex really is because it makes everything a lot clearer for people. now, that may upset some people. and i'm not sorry for that, really, but that's just fact, isn't it?
2:18 am
it's just absolute fact. and we have to stand by facts. otherwise what have we got? lewis? >> so you're saying that labour doesn't care about having these bathrooms, which could be some question. question? >> i don't think they do. i genuinely don't think they do care. i think they're totally overrun by ideology. and i think that women should have safe spaces for women. spaces 101“ women. >> spaces for women. >> that's it, isn't it? it's ideology. so the shadow minister for the shadow minister for women and equalities has said labour simply cares more about appeasing woke ideologues than delivering on women's safety. i mean, it's that simple. >> no, it isn't that simple. it's even simpler than that. it's even simpler than that. it's that it's what is there funny about this is that labour is the party is team world and they believe in gender non—identity whatever gender identity they believe that that it's not a problem . whereas it's not a problem. whereas people on our side, let's say thatis people on our side, let's say that is our side, which i'm not sure it's my side, but whatever is that we believe that you should have a girl's bathrooms. we don't want men in our
2:19 am
bathrooms. they don't care. so if they don't care, they're not going to make a big deal about it. it's as simple is that simpler? >> i think you agreed with us. i don't know if you meant. >> yeah, i thought it was the same, to be honest. yeah, well, it continues, doesn't it? i thought this was on its way out. it looks like it isn't. >> no, it isn't, because the other team, team world, the. you know, those people who believe in covid and they believe in climate change and they believe in trans stuff, they believe this stuff. so why are you asking them to go against what they believe ? they're not? they believe? they're not? >> i'm not asking that. it would be my preference. okay. staying in the telegraph. sorry about that. >> was that too much? >> was that too much? >> i've got no idea. parents would rather trust a child with their life savings than trust our own government. >> yeah, well, this is the same point. the same point is, is that that the their team families rushed to give away fortunes over inheritance tax raid fears. and what they're saying is they're going to raise they're going to raise and raise and raise because they don't think that the people's money, that this is the thing about about keir starmer , the lovely
2:20 am
about keir starmer, the lovely guy, he seems like a very nice guy, he seems like a very nice guy, but he thinks he's better than everybody else. and that's the thing about the left, they think they can do a betterjob spending my money. if the little money that i make, spending your money that i make, spending your money making more money than i make, whatever it is that they think. and so what they're going to do is the budget's coming out in october and it's going to take more and more of our money away from us. so they're saying that the people are saying, we've got to figure out how to spend the money before labour gets a hold of it. >> yeah, okay. so you're quickly getting rid of your millions, paul getting rid of your millions, paul, what do you make of. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> i always think that inheritance tax , particularly to inheritance tax, particularly to the nth degree that labour will take it is robbing the future to pay take it is robbing the future to pay for today's scornful labour policies. i genuinely think it is robbery. i mean, this is this is robbery. i mean, this is this is money that people have accumulated . so if you accumulated. so if you basically, in order to keep taking it the way they do, you have to dislike the fact that they have this money or have accumulated this money in some way, and that, you know, and they create an image in people's minds that this is very rich and
2:21 am
very wealthy people. it's not necessarily particularly given the housing price booms of the last couple of generations, which means that people that were working class or middle class aspiring in any way , have class aspiring in any way, have been able to generate a small wealth for themselves to pass on to the future of their families, to the future of their families, to give them a better life. and this is taking it. this is taking it away. and i think labour labour are trying to just labour labour are trying to just labour are trying to create this in order to justify the way that they're going to spend this money. for me , it's of course money. for me, it's of course they would say it's wealth redistribution, wouldn't they? >> they say that they've got a black hole from the tories and that they need to do this so they can go to poorer people. but it does disincentivize people, doesn't it? >> but that's what that's what labour does. you're acting all surprised at this thing. that's what labour does. they want. they think they know better. they're going to take away going to take away people's money and they're going they're going to take away people's money and they're going to, you know, it's like what to, you know, it's like what margaret thatcher said about margaret thatcher said about about this, which i forgot. but about this, which i forgot. but i know she had she had ronald i know she had she had ronald reagan, you know, when they run reagan, you know, when they run out of it's like it's all it's out of it's like it's all it's very easy to run out of other very easy to run out of other
2:22 am
people's money, other people's money. and that's what they are doing. and that you i'm not saying we shouldn't have elected them because the tories were basically doing the same thing. they were raising taxes and taking people's money, and they weren't doing a betterjob of it. you need to have a political party. who cares about the family, the country, family in the country. and maybe we know labour are going to come hard. my labour are going to come hard. my tie it is your tie. is that my tie? >> is that the tie? >> is that the tie? >> we had this discussion before we came on air. now's not the time to have it. >> he thinks that ties are just. >> he thinks that ties are just. >> that was the tie that i wore on this show. >> keir starmer's approach to taking i have. >> yeah. look, this is redistribution of ties. >> well, monday's express now the government recently came under fire for discriminating against old people for balance. they're now going after kids with special needs as well paul. >> they are disaster for keir starmer as labour. labour faces high court legal challenge. so
2:23 am
against children discriminates against children with special education needs. sen for those who are familiar with that. and it's true, many people who are many people are under the impression that the only the children that are going to these private schools are going there because their families are wealthy and in some cases , of course that's true. of cases, of course that's true. of course it's true. however, there are lots of aspiring families that have chosen to send their scrimped and saved and sacrificed a lot of things to send their children to private schools, to improve. for instance, children with dyslexia, because in our state schools, there are classrooms 3040 deep and a child that has any particular special needs gets lost in that. amongst the disruption of 30 or 40 children. in one very good point. >> i mean, i completely i understand that, but i also think the state schools maybe could do with improving. i mean , could do with improving. i mean, i agree, so there is some. >> but however it seems this is a pointed attack for me. it feels, you know, this is i'm someone who never went to a
2:24 am
private school. i don't know if either of you two did, but i didn't go to a private school. but you can obviously see the benefits of private schools. and if someone has aspired to do that, i think they should be able to do that. for me, it's a bit like building wealth through and not having it taken away. >> oh my god, you know, your whole thing. you got people have to rethink things completely. here is that this is just 20% tax that the government is taking away, charging people from an already high amount, that they're charging the people and the people that they're charging those kids are going to school. their parents still have to pay into the tax system, which is going to other people to send their kids. the whole thing is not the state should not be having school systems. they're unfit people. people in this country , they love the this country, they love the government. they whatever you call it, not the government. we american, we call it the government. they love the state. they think, oh my god, the state can do a good job with the schools. they can't. i wouldn't trust my kids to go to school, just as i wouldn't trust my kids with the nhs. i wouldn't trust my kids with anything that the government has any, because it's
2:25 am
run by people like keir starmer. >> okay, well, for a bit of pushback, i really enjoyed my gcses and i'm glad i've got them. so moving to the guardian, donald trump's had a bright idea about what to do with unscrupulous behaviour. i hope you're taking notes, louis. >> you know what? this. i should take notes because donald trump is now a great man. i'm sorry. he was. he was heading in that direction. i didn't believe it. a few years ago, i was anti—trump, but now i'm like, totally converted to the guy. the guy got shot in the head. trump threatens, he got shot in the head and he's shouting, come on, the guy's got shot in the head and now he's your kind of guy. he's my guy. because because you can see he's getting better. he's going to die. >> just quick question. >> just quick question. >> did you ever get shot in the head? >> no, i've been kicked in the head. >> just it just felt appropriate. >> i'm trying my best tonight. please, paul, give me a break. you stole my tie. i just had it on the counter there. story. story. sorry sorry. of course. you were a very good student with your gcses. the people on twitter who've specifically asked me to keep you in line tonight of course they do, because they don't know any better. the ones who don't are my fans anyway. trump threatens
2:26 am
to jail adversaries for unscrupulous behaviour if he wins. what did he say? what did he trump say? he says when i win, those people who cheated will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, which will include long term prison sentence, so that this depravity of justice does not happen again. is that so shocking? he said, if they've cheated, which is against the law, he means against the law, they'll be prosecuted. meanwhile, donald trump's been prosecuted four times and is still on his feet . god, you still on his feet. god, you know, he's he's the man in the guardian, isn't it, paul? >> i mean, they they have a history of not being big trump fans. >> god love the guardian. i mean, this is unbelievable really, because this language is quite tame in comparison to the language that they've supported from the labour party when they've talked about things like they've talked about things like the full force of the law against rioters in this country, they have absolutely backed and supported keir starmer, sending people to prison for three years for saying the wrong thing on the internet. and now all of a sudden they're clutching their
2:27 am
pearls at donald trump. donald is saying something. it's honestly the guardian are hilarious. this is the one reason i'm glad there's still a publication, because when stuff comes like this, it must be so difficult for them to write. they must. if they they it's like they should do it in front of the mirror. can can can i continue to do this? what did i say last week, last week? if it if it suits them, if it's in line with their ideology, it's fine and it doesn't. >> and you're right about them clutching their their pearls. that's what the that's what the democratic party in america has become. that's what labour party has become. these fancy pants people who are living in east dulwich, they're just you know what i mean specifically, specifically like that's the end of part two. >> come back after the break to hear about high rates of guideline breaches at the bbc. high rates of transition celebrity children and highly inappropriate plans to
2:31 am
first look at monday's newspapers, beginning this section with the eye following accusations of their bias in the coverage of the israel—gaza conflict. the bbc says we didn't do it. let's remember that defence next time you're in trouble . lewis. trouble. lewis. >> which one is this? >> which one is this? >> sorry. ten. >> sorry. ten. >> oh >> sorry. ten. >> on bbc yeah, bbc rejects claim it breached guidelines 1500 times with gaza coverage and this is a report that they did you know they, they looked at four months worth of the fact is it's like the bbc is the state. what what do i call it. big brother communications. it's the state sponsored. >> well let's just say what happened.so >> well let's just say what happened. so there was a review. >> there was a review. >> there was a review. >> there was a review of all the
2:32 am
>> there was a review. >> you're was a review of all the >> there was a review. >> you're was a rthatv of all the >> there was a review. >> you're was a rthat regardless >> you're saying that regardless of the i results and how many times they use genocide with one side or the other, you're saying that because of the way they reported events, you think there's a bias at the bbc? >> i think that there's a bias. i think everybody thinks there's a bias. there's always been a bias. >> and the fact is, the bbc doesn't think there's a bias. >> yes, they do, of course they're liars. they're absolutely. why can't i call them liars? is that is that they represent they represent a certain faction, which is the left faction . and you could say, left faction. and you could say, well, they they're against the labour sometimes, but they support the team world concept, which is anti—israel . which is anti—israel. >> anyway, they're pushing back on this finding, aren't they? and they're saying it's sometimes it's out of context. they don't trust i, they don't trust the methodology here. >> they don't trust the ai methodology, which just picks up on particular words. and that's what he's using, however. well, let's make no bones about it. it is very difficult subject to report on. we have to try and talk about it ourselves. it is. there is a fine line. it's a
2:33 am
murky business. one thing that isn't difficult is to call hamas a terrorist organisation and it took them months literally months to identify hamas as a terrorist organisation. and for me, irrespective of this 1500, you know, occasions, just that alone was enough to bring into question the rest. this is what happens, you know, a bad apple spoils the bunch. and for me, what they they've thrown themselves under the bus with all of this because they tried to be impartial with terrorism. so they they tried to they tried to take raping and murdering and just play soft with it. and they to take raping and murdering and just play soft with it. and they just play soft with it. and they just couldn't achieve it. just play soft with it. and they just couldn't achieve it. >> you were so naive, paul. i >> you were so naive, paul. i mean , it's not that they are mean , it's not that they are mean, it's not that they are a bad reporting agency and they mean, it's not that they are a bad reporting agency and they could have done a betterjob could have done a betterjob reporting on stuff, or they threw themselves under the bus. reporting on stuff, or they threw themselves under the bus. no, they are the broken bus. no, they are the broken bus. they they believe this stuff to they they believe this stuff to the core because they represent the core because they represent a bigger picture, which is which a bigger picture, which is which is not england. they don't is not england. they don't
2:34 am
represent the country. they and represent the country. they lie. bbc lies and if you pay for the bbc, if you watch the bbc, why should, why should people in this country be taxed to be given propaganda? >> just in the bbc's defence, they have said they're going to carefully consider this research. so i think this is another story to be continued . another story to be continued. okay. we're in the daily mail now, hoping to shed some light on why transitioning, which can cost upwards of $300,000, is more common in high status celebrity families. paul, i haven't got a scooby doo. >> tell us why are
2:35 am
haven't got a scooby doo. >> tell us 165! are haven't got a scooby doo. >> tell us ias transgender, that coming out as transgender, that correlation between the two things and what they're trying to say within this story is that, you know, being brought up as the child of celebrity can be quite traumatic. it's definitely outside of the norm. what i would say is, i think personally that it's to do with the celebrities unwavering desire to remain important. for celebrities unwavering desire to remain important . for me, celebrities unwavering desire to remain important. for me, this is what it's all about. it's about fashion. it's about ideology, and it's about staying in the limelight. the reason i can say this is because megan fox has three children, all three children are transgender . three children are transgender. that the statistics does seem three children are transgender. that the statistics does seem pretty. the stats around that, pretty. the stats around that, the odds of that are impossible. the odds of that are impossible. the odds of her being a the odds of her being a narcissist are much lower. narcissist are much lower. >> lois, any comment on that? i >> lois, any comment on that? i know you've got . know you've got . know you've got. >> well, you're totally you're know you've got. >> well, you're totally you're totally. you always have the totally. you always have the simplest approach, and that's simplest approach, and that's why the people love you. they why the people love you. they love you. they love you. they love you. they love you. they don't have to think when they don't have to think when they say, oh, that makes sense about say, oh, that makes sense about our viewers, lois. our viewers, lois. >> but, the people's government >> but, the people's government and the rashes are very clever. and the rashes are very clever.
2:36 am
>> exactly, . >> exactly, exactly. there's no subtlety in a piece of piece of ham and but the truth is, is thatis ham and but the truth is, is that is that this trans thing is a new thing. it's a cutting edge thing. and people in hollywood are cutting edge people. they live in hollywood , they're in live in hollywood, they're in the entertainment business. they hear this stuff first. so of course they're going to go for it first. >> so really what you're saying is they want to stay relevant, which i think is what paul just said about he didn't mean he didn't mean maybe you're right. >> sorry, i apologise i apologise for saying that. >> paul. >> paul.
2:37 am
>> is that that it's truth is, is that is that it's you could just as easily do it by by by doing a height to weight measurement. you take you take a whatever the height, weight you take the strip, whatever call the tape measure, tape measure, tape measure. you wrap it around this, this should be half your height. so if your waist is 32 as mine is beautiful, so you're upset about the methodology. >> isn't the point here that people don't think the school should be interfering in children's health? >> absolutely. i'm also too short for my weight. so or not tall enough for my weight? i don't know which it is. oh, you're you're too short for your waist. right. okay, let's keep this on track. on track? >> why can't we be in the same shot? why does it. >> it's too much. look, look, there are. there are women out there are. there are women out there trying to sleep. have they got both of us in one shot? yeah, they're staying awake all night. one thing i will say is obviously this. this, this sort of taps into the psyche that says, this is this is not good. you know , should you be should you know, should you be should you be fat shaming children, i think it's probably a good i
2:38 am
think it's probably a good i think from a purely health and medical perspective, it's probably not a bad thing to keep track, particularly with all the bad diets that are available to us now. i always, i always used to say that taking bullying out of school was a bad thing . what of school was a bad thing. what i didn't think they would do. >> you had to come and work here is have, you know, the teachers start the bullying? >> because this is what's going to happen here because you know , to happen here because you know, essentially the school are the ones going to go, you know, you're going to know, i mean, one thing they're not saying in this story is that they're going to weigh people in front of the class. that would be madness. imagine that. >> but very, very effective. >> but very, very effective. >> i really yeah, i wouldn't have i wouldn't have a teacher do anything . do anything. >> they are completely i don't want to say anything about their promiscuity and their their lack of whatever. i don't want it. >> i don't want in your homeschooling opinions. >> exactly. it's the same thing. i don't want i don't want the school which is state run, to tell my kid that he's fat. i mean, not when you can do it. yeah, when i can do it. >> yeah, exactly. you can do it on tv, you know, maybe. >> maybe call the teacher and say, hey, we think your kid is
2:39 am
fat and shame and shame the teacher shame the parent. >> okay. the parent moving on. only faithful dogs and english persons go out in the midday sun or listen to guidance from the un. paul, this is in the mail. >> oh, here we go, un agency told staff not to say englishman or man's best friend in latest crackdown on gendered language. where have we seen all this before? the geneva based world intellectual property organisation sounds terrifying, which protects trademarks and patents globally , or has also patents globally, or has also vetoed masculine terms such as forefathers and brotherhood of man. now, of course, this is just playing right into our hands. it's playing into our hands. it's playing into our hands. of course we don't think that these things are good. i mean, prescribing speech is authoritarian. there's no two ways about it. i mean, the word orwellian has been, you know, has been bandied about, bored of thinking it. it's incredible. i mean, if you are offended by man's best friend, then you should. you're probably the sort of adult that still likes to be
2:40 am
breastfed by their mum. >> but you know what? the answer to this question paul is in is in the title world intellectual property organisation. it's the world. anything with the world except the world series is completely horrible. you should never listen to anything in the world series, which is just for the american teams to play in. yes, okay, they mislabelled it, but the world series is good and so and so as my father , who was so and so as my father, who was a member of the world intellectual property organisation , because he was he. organisation, because he was he. yes, he was a pagan. >> i'm now offended. you. >> i'm now offended. you. >> yeah. you did. >> yeah. you did. >> thank god for that. it's taken me two years. >> he was a patent attorney. >> he was a patent attorney. >> this is just it's just natural. over time, words change and they they deteriorate or they get better. you can't use certain words. i can't even say what those words you can't use. no, you definitely can't. >> they just obviously about the acceleration lewis as you well know taking us to the break. we've got lewis talking about schoolgirl skirts and this doesn't make me nervous at all. this is in the telegraph, lewis. >> it makes me nervous to school accused of degrading girls after lining them up for two hours to measure their skirts. this is a place called ryde academy in in
2:41 am
the isle of wight, and they spend two hours measuring there. 70 female pupil skirts to enforce a new uniform policy and if this and i don't know whether this is a state school or not, but if it's a private school and the parents voted on this or agreed to this, or they knew about it when they sent their kids to that school, this this is not an issue. a school, if you're going to have a high of a school and the school says, we're going to measure your kid to make sure they're not being all slutty, you know, i apologise for that language. >> it's not not the choice of words i would have gone for, but is that on the list of a bad word? i don't know, i think it might be. we don't know. >> we don't have time now to discuss it. >> i think this is. yeah. i mean, it's quite, quite an exciting headline for quite a reasonable story, really, isn't it, paul? you know what? >> when lewis started making his point. valid point, i would imagine the rest, i'll leave that for our legal team to decide . but the thing about this decide. but the thing about this is, i'm sure this is part of the school uniform. i'm sure it's prescribed. and all the parents know that skirts or dresses or
2:42 am
whatever should be at knee length, and these weren't. and i mean, the idea of standing all the girls in the school up for two hours and then measuring their dress does sound a little bit, s&m, but only the way you're thinking about it, i think had a lot of people to measure, and they maybe weren't waiting. but we are stuck between two worlds now, aren't we? that's a very old fashioned way of looking at the world. uniforms are important. everyone looks the same. everyone feels the same on the on the flip side of that, we've got a government that says you can be whatever you like, whatever you like. you know, you should have your dress long if you're transgender, to hide your testicles. >> oh my goodness. okay, time for right now, but join us in the final section. we'll be discussing how to cope with climate anxiety, how quit yourjob what jesus really thought of traditional
2:46 am
with the daily mail. in these godless times, one enterprising woman of the cloth is staying relevant . paul. relevant. paul. >> well, she's giving it a go, ain't she? woke oregon chaplain is helping eco warriors say goodbye to species. while activists deal with the anxiety of climate grief. good grief. so this is , reverend liz olsen, a this is, reverend liz olsen, a trained hospital chaplain, now runs the sustaining climate activist group . after turning to activist group. after turning to those struggling with saying goodbye to species as a climate change. it's okay, isn't it? i mean, climate it is. it is rather insightful, though, isn't it? it's revealing because climate change is very much the activism, very much relies on fear. as we, as i think we all agree, so of course, the outcome of that , the side effect of that of that, the side effect of that is going to be people filled with anxiety. now, if you look at the statistics, there's there are there are animals that become extinct every year. there are animals that get reintroduced every year. you can
2:47 am
look up on the internet and find which ones went last year, which ones came back, reintroduced. they do. they get found again, they disappear. >> oh i see, so they just went missing. >> they didn't know they were extinct. and then one just pops up like on a stag do where one goes missing. three days later he turns up that sort of thing. but you either believe in the darwinian evolution theory or not. it's the survival of the fittest. animals come and go, you know, it just. or you believe it's god's will that these animals are gone. >> you could still be sad about it. >> you can still be sad about it. but if you're going to worry about species coming and going, you know, the three spotted, leaf toed, right handed fishmonger's thingy of mexico, and you're going to get sad about it. you are going to be sad about a lot of things every day. >> oh my god, that is so stupid. >> oh my god, that is so stupid. >> paul. yes, the fact is , is we >> paul. yes, the fact is, is we should miss some species if there's no more tigers, we would be sad. if there's no more bears, would we look at the zoo? yeah, but exactly . but the truth is, but exactly. but the truth is, is they're not worried about the
2:48 am
number one eliminated species, which is western people. you know, the birthrate has gone way down. this chaplain probably is not doing her part or is his part or whatever his her part. >> her name is liz. >> her name is liz. >> we shouldn't assume we couldn't assume. >> so we shouldn't. we should be sad about animals. but it's not climate change that's doing it. we should be. but we should be sad about people. we need more and more people on this planet. >> humanitarian. i mean , it's >> humanitarian. i mean, it's good work, isn't it? moving on to the times and i see an opportunity for you here, louis. >> it's scary to quit your job in japan. these firms will do it for you for a fee. and this is this company that, you know, you you want to go and tell your boss, you know, you can just go to hell. take this job and whatever. can i use the word say that i just did i didn't say it. >> well, you got to do is think that. yeah before you say that. so come on. >> what happens? this is people in japan who they're paying their young people, isn't it? they're paying £120 to go through the procedure of giving their notice in and facing their boss, because they have a bully
2:49 am
boss. >> and this was quite interesting because it's some it's one of these stories in the times. whatever it is, it says she was afraid to face her female suit supervisor, who was a bully like you are to me. >> i am firm but fair, and you'd be grateful. >> no people out there. you can go on twitter. you can say is cressida bully? she's worse. she's worse than andrew. and andrew is horrible to me. but andrew is horrible to me. but andrew made you. >> how dare you, paul. any thoughts on this before we move on? >> well, i think it's very interesting actually, because japan has essentially dismissed or not taken on the western woke culture whatsoever. so many people might not be aware of this. it's something i'm aware of. japan really has has never adopted it. you could say rejected it, but it's never actually adopted it. and these are the sorts of things now that we find shocking that you know, if you read within this articles, you had things thrown at her. she was shouted at. we wouldn't consider any of these things good. but this was back in the day when bosses were bosses and they were in charge of people. and this is what. so
2:50 am
maybe the i don't know what i'm saying here. maybe i'm arguing for woke . i don't think i am, for woke. i don't think i am, but japan is kind of woke free. it's like one of those islands that has never seen it's not completely woke free, because this is some woman who's got a job, and that's why women should not work. >> wow . okay. >> wow. okay. >> wow. okay. >> wonderful stuff. >> wonderful stuff. >> back to god again. now paul, this is in the telegraph, >> the title is what jesus really thought a traditional family values. then there are 700,000 words about it. and what i can tell you is we have no idea what he thought about traditional family values. but anyway, this article in the telegraph gives a good crack. and this is because of the us election . and the us election is election. and the us election is very much leaning towards the whole idea of the christian. not all of it, obviously. on the republican side of things under jd vance, which rhymes with pants. and they talk very much. they talk very much about christian values and the whole question , like, what would jesus question, like, what would jesus do? in the same way, you know, what would beyonce do? and they try to come up with this kind of, i think, probably western american version of what's good, bad and indifferent. now louis,
2:51 am
is that an english saying good, bad and indifferent? >> is that an english saying? which bit is that an american version of the of what's good or bad? >> what does jesus think? good or bad? >> so jesus, according to jd vance, thinks vance . oh, sorry, vance, thinks vance. oh, sorry, but it rhymes, doesn't it? he he thinks that. yeah, jesus would be on the side of the republicans. >> lovely. okay, we've just got time for one more. we've got the times next telling us that bio age is just a number, or rather, age is just a number, or rather, a set of numbers you can discover for a monthly fee. lewis >> yes. >> yes. >> what is the fitness age and should it be trusted? it's a lot of these guys going around saying my telomeres are this and my you know, my, my blood sugar is this. and my fitness age . and is this. and my fitness age. and the truth is it's all a lie. it's like that guy who spent £2 million a year. what's his name? brian. something. and he's, you know, that guy. he's a guy. he goes on tv and says, i am so young looking. and if you look closely at the pictures, he looks absolutely horrible. i am 67 years old. i think i look at how great i look, let's be
2:52 am
honest. >> great. >> great. >> okay , the show is nearly >> okay, the show is nearly oven >> okay, the show is nearly over, so let's take another quick look at monday's front pages. the telegraph has nhs in decline for first time in 50 years, the daily mail has. labour said cutting oap winter fuel cash could kill 4000. the express has. axing of winter fuel payments was cruel planned betrayal. the times has starmer to give fuel rebels short shrift and the guardian has. scores of mps could refuse to back starmer over cut in fuel payments. and finally, the daily star has brought something about the weather. and those were your front pages. that's it for tonight's show. thank you to my guests, paul cox and lewis schaffer. andrew doyle will be here tomorrow night at 11 pm. with lewis again and josh howie. and if you're watching at 5 am, please stay tuned for breakfast. good night. >> thank you. chris for that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers, sponsors of weather on gb. >> news .
2:53 am
>> news. >> news. >> hello there. welcome to your latest gb news weather from the met office. low pressure has beenin met office. low pressure has been in charge bringing heavy rain and thunderstorms. some localised flooding does stay unsettled next week but the winds turn to a northerly direction and it turns increasingly cold, particularly by the middle of the week. low pressure at the moment still giving outbreaks of heavy rain across southeast scotland, northern england down into wales. parts of the midlands as well. thundery showers across the southeast and as we head overnight, this all slowly pushes its way eastward. still some heavy bursts of rain possible. dry across northern ireland and scotland, with a few showers here under the clearest skies across scotland. temperatures dipping into single figures elsewhere under the cloud and rain holding up around 12 to 14 celsius. so much of england and wales starting quite cloudy. outbreaks of rain but clearer skies across scotland. a few showers across the highlands and islands, but some bright spells elsewhere just so still some thicker cloud across the southeast with some patchy rain
2:54 am
in places. bright skies across northern ireland to start monday morning, though rather cloudy across much of england, though. sunny spells starting to develop across wales and the west country. first thing on monday morning and then through the day. the bright spells across the west just slowly start to push eastwards. it does mean, though, central eastern parts of england staying cloudy for longest, the cloud thick enough for some outbreaks of rain at times. sunny spells across northern england, wales, the west country though starting to cloud over across northern ireland and scotland, with rain arriving in the west later on in the day. temperatures cooler for all, generally near average for the time of year 16 to 18 celsius, perhaps locally 20 towards the southeast. turning more unsettled on tuesday as a weather system pushes southeastward, some outbreaks of rain showers following the winds, picking up some strong and gusty winds across northern and gusty winds across northern and western parts of the uk as well. starting to feel colder, and that cold theme continues through the week ahead as well. temperatures falling below average for the time of year.
2:58 am
good. on well . it's 9:00 on oh well. it's 9:00 on television, on radio and online, in the united kingdom and across the world. this is mark dolan tonight, in my opinion. who would be a pensioner in 2024? the vicious cuts to winter fuel payments are a decision prime minister starmer will come to regret. i'll be tackling this growing political scandal in no uncertain terms in just a moment. breaking tonight robert jenrick surges ahead of kemi badenoch in the race for the tory leadership . this, according tory leadership. this, according to a bombshell new poll amid accusations of dirty campaign tricks. could this contest tear the fractured tories further
2:59 am
apart? and it might take at ten, the chilling war on free speech continues. why? because the privileged elites don't want you to have a voice. whether it's attacks on gb news or efforts to shut down platforms like x, the right to say what we think has never faced greater peril. well, i'll be fighting back in my take at ten plus is princess kate's anticipated return to public life. this autumn. the good news that we've all been waiting for ? that we've all been waiting for? i'll be asking britain's best connected royal expert . connected royal expert. so two hours of big opinion, big debate and big entertainment. this show, if you're new to it, has a golden rule we don't do boring. not on my watch . i just boring. not on my watch. i just won't have it. so a big two
3:00 am
hours and i'll be speaking up for the pensioners after the news headlines with the very young tatiana sanchez . young tatiana sanchez. >> mark, thank you. and today marks two years since the passing of britain's longest reigning monarch, queen elizabeth. the second. she was on the throne for 70 years and was beloved by the nation and around the world. well, earlier today, the king and queen attended crathie kirk church near balmoral, where the late queen was a regular worshipper, and they were there for a sunday service with prayer and remembrance of his late mother, who passed at the age of 96. the prime minister has hit out at the previous government this morning, saying the nhs has been broken in ways that he called unforgivable. these comments come as a labour commissioned review into how children are treated by the nhs, is due to be published in the coming week. health secretary wes streeting set out labour's plan to tackle the nhs crisis.
15 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
TV-GBN Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on