okay. well, folks, if you're just joining us, let me tell you that what could have been a third attempt on donald trump's life has been thwarted by the us

authorities. yesterday, donald trump was in california, in coachella, and an individual was apprehended with multiple firearms, saying, i want to kill donald trump. the guy is now on bail. but a very concerning development . we know that development. we know that trump's not safe. two attempts have already been made on his life. i was on air for that first notorious shooting in pennsylvania , but we'll bring pennsylvania, but we'll bring you more on that as we get it. but trump is safe. he wasn't physically attacked. but you do have to hope that both candidates make it to november in one piece. also, folks, let me tell you a very big reaction to my take at ten. an extraordinary attack on gb news by ian hislop. have i got news for you featured dame andrea jenkyns. she suffered a pretty rough experience on that show. he was rude to her. he swore at her and she claimed that the audience was biased. now we've reached out to the bbc and we've said, can you tell us how the audience for have i got news for you is selected? they use a

third party company called sro audiences. the audience members are randomly selected. the bbc tell me. however, some tickets go to friends and family of the production team, although they wouldn't be let on. what percentage that is. so there you go. well , let percentage that is. so there you go. well, let me tell you that it's really broken. the internet. this story , and dame internet. this story, and dame andrea jenkyns joins us live on the show in about ten minutes time, talking about her experience on have i got news for you. but first, tomorrow's papers . and let's start with the papers. and let's start with the i newspaper. university bosses claim £1 million expenses amid cash crisis warning. and our investigation reveals vice chancellor claims for luxury hotels. expensive flights and £1,000 dinners. the higher education leaders, who earned £300,000 on average, also issue claims for a £39 herb chopper

and a £1 can of drink. where were they? soho , in central were they? soho, in central london metro now mps to debate assisted dying bill this week . assisted dying bill this week. 12 years and nothing has changed in relation to a daughter very concerned about her seriously ill father. daily mirror now royal storm down under. not a good day for charles australia tore blow after every state leader pulls out of official reception. how dare they? the guardian safety fears as starmer pledges to slash red tape for investors. cut risks, story cuts risk wiping out uk's black scholarship is the other headune scholarship is the other headline and un israeli tanks have forced their way into a base. daily star now soggy brits snap up boots and raincoats. the welly forecast met office in extreme weather alerts. that's all we need. daily express now. labour betrays voters with eight more years of illegal migration.

sir keir starmer has been accused of betraying voters after he signed up to eight more years of uncontrolled illegal immigration. the premier had pledged to smash the channel people smuggling gangs. but today the home office published contracts to run processing centres in kent with expiry dates of 2032. so have labour betrayed the electorate when it comes to illegal immigration? let's get the views now. former brexit party mep annunziata rees—mogg, former tory mp and now farmer neil parish and former labour special adviser paul richards. paul, i'll ask you to start with this one, is this a betrayal of voters, given that keir starmer said he would smash the criminal gangs? >> well, the story is based on the awarding of these contracts and in government contracting terms, you have to have a sort of an end point. terms, you have to have a sort of an end point . and so of an end point. and so i understand they've just given a date in the future. that doesn't mean that all efforts to stop illegal migration have come to a

juddering halt, nor that there's been a betrayal of the pledges made in the election to smash the gangs. both of those things are ploughing on ahead, but obviously we're not seeing it in the numbers, are we? well, it is early days and it's a very big, widespread problem that we know we have to tackle. but i think this, this story is based on a sort of bit of bureaucracy within government. it's not a statement of government intent. it's just to do with some contracts. >> neil, every eu nation has been busy trying to smash the gangs for decades now. >> yeah. i mean, i agree that it's a contract being let for a certain period, but i but i would say that i don't think keir starmer and the labour party really have a plan on immigration whatsoever, and i just don't think they will be able to stop it. i think they you know, they've they've got whether you agree with rwanda or not, at least it was some form of deterrent . now that's not of deterrent. now that's not there, i think. >> paul, you're shaking your head. >> i think you're massively, massively expensive. >> mistake it may have been massive. >> it may have been massively expensive, but what it what it

what it would what it did do was send a clear message to those that are coming. they may land up in rwanda. i think. you mean if you if you saw the interviews of many of those trying to cross the channel after keir starmer got in and got rid of the rwanda project, then they thought he was a very nice man and were going to come to britain. is that what they'll be naming their kids after keir starmer won't they. >> indeed. but i mean, paul says rwanda was a very expensive folly. this contracts £521 million. it's not peanuts. these costs are adding up all the time we're paying. what is it, 8 million a day for hotels at the moment, the processing centres are only to get them to those hotels. the idea that these millions of houses are going to be built in time, that the hotels won't be required , is not hotels won't be required, is not going to happen. it does seem like labour has thrown the baby out with the bathwater. it didn't like rwanda. it scrapped that there is now no deterrent. but they also have no alternative plan. do you think labour should come up with a

deterrent because it makes sense , deterrent because it makes sense, doesn't it, to have some factor that would would play in the minds of anyone considering crossing the channel illegally, that would stop them? >> i think the deterrent has to be in the minds of the organised gangs who are profiting from this human misery, and you need to stop the boats in france before they get anywhere near the channel. you need to have better coordination with the belgian and the french authorities, and you need to smash the criminal gangs. and that's what labour is determined to do. >> but do you think it was a mistake by keir starmer? he said that he would scrap rwanda even if it worked. so this is political. this is ideological isn't it? no. why would you, why would you scrap a policy that works? >> because it was a daft idea. it was never going to work and it was costing us all a fortune. >> well, what about the irish government who said that it was working? >> yes. >> yes. >> right. well, what? working for who? >> because what happened? is that migrants were heading straight to ireland instead of mainland uk. because they were so worried about rwanda. >> more ministers went to rwanda than illegal immigrants. >> yeah, but if you take countries like germany who've actually considered actually looking at rwanda, which they are the probably the most whatever parties are in power

over there, probably some of the most liberal regimes you'll find then. i can't see why it's so terrible. and it became absolutely a political thing that we must get rid of rwanda. those terrible right wing tories, you know, we will do it better. they've got no actual policy. >> annunciator , but the idea >> annunciator, but the idea that the tories were ever going to stop the boats was a big, fat lie in itself, wasn't it the tory? >> i'm not going to defend the tories on their success or failure on immigration, that it was clearly a failure. and you go right the way back to immigration on both . but if you immigration on both. but if you go right the way back to may, she wanted to get it down to the tens of thousands, and she failed to. and the tories kept promising and not delivering . promising and not delivering. but unfortunately for labour, they are now tarnished with that same brush because it is assumed that politicians aren't listening and in fact they've got to prove they are. >> are you not convinced by labour's policy, though, of stopping the problem at source, which is what smashing the gangs is all about? >> smashing the 1523 00:08:59,800 --> 00:08:59