talent which, which, which the talent which, which, which has been the expression used for decades. >> exactly. it's an expression, isn't it.7 it's like that's all it is . it's like calling it is. it's like calling doctors, medics or political journalists , politicos. journalists, politicos. >> there is a talent door. there is a talent . is a talent. >> i've always understood the talent to mean the people who like you too, who sit in front of them. >> even though we have no discernible talent. yes. >> no. well, that matters terribly. i mean, the bbc have given up using the word impartial because they're clearly not impartial. and it's quite natural they will follow by not using the word talent, because most of them are not talented these days. >> they're doing it for all the wrong reasons, because there's so much scandal around their talent. they can't. they can no longer call them talent. >> well , there is that. >> well, there is that. >> well, there is that. >> i mean, the bbc is an anathema. it is anachronistic. it is completely wrong that the licence payers are having to tolerate all this nonsense. they produce and also pay gary

lineker £i.5 produce and also pay gary lineker £1.5 million for talking about football clips. well, the bbc does have to think about what it wants to be. it does. that's the things the whole landscape has changed so completely in broadcasting. yeah. and i think for tim davie to admit talent is no longer part of the bbc is a very good step in the right direction. he's finally realising what his head of . head of. >> but on a serious point, you're right about the bbc, because so many young people never watch a television. no, that's right and they will not pay that's right and they will not pay for a tv licence ever. no. and why should they? >> right, gentlemen, we have to stop there because the talent has spoken. talking, talking of talent , here has spoken. talking, talking of talent, here is has spoken. talking, talking of talent , here is the very talent, here is the very talented tatiana. with your news. >> dave, thank you very much. the same to you. well, the top story this morning, the prime minister and the health secretary have both said new weight loss jabs could help boost the economy in britain by getting people back into work. wes streeting suggested the

latest generation of medicines, including ozempic, could be life changing for individuals, and they say it would ease pressure on the nhs. experts, though, have warned in the past that the drug is not a quick fix or a replacement for eating well and exercising. they say it should only be offered under medical supervision. exchequer secretary to the treasury james murray told gb news it's a good idea for the economy. >> we want to make sure that people who are not working at the moment for any reasons, but obviously obesity is one of them. we want to support them to get back into work and these weight loss jabs are just one opfion weight loss jabs are just one option for helping people to lose weight. there will obviously be a discussion between a patient and their doctor to work out the best way for them to lose weight. these weight loss jabs play a role as part of the overall set of interventions that you can make to help people lose weight and to help people lose weight and to where they can work , get back to where they can work, get back into work, which is good for them and good for the economy . them and good for the economy. >> in other news, children who

were doomscrolling for hours a day on smartphones are at risk of widespread harm , according to of widespread harm, according to labour mp josh mcallister, the equivalent of seat belt legislation is needed to help them manage addictive content for children. tomorrow , for children. tomorrow, mcallister will introduced a private member's bill in parliament on protecting children from harms caused by excessive screen time. the bill will call for legal requirements to be introduced so all schools in england are mobile free zones and is also expected to call for the age at which companies can get data consent from children without parental permission to be raised from 13 to 16. now the mother of salisbury poisonings victim dawn sturgess, has said her family found comfort that she was the only person to be killed by the russian nerve agent novichok when the potential harm was much, much more. the inquiry has been told it was pure chance that dawn sprayed herself with the substance before meeting up with her daughter. dawn's mother, caroline sturgess, says dawn had plans to meet her daughter before she discovered the perfume bottle containing

novichok, and said it was a solace to her family that dawn's daughter was not also killed in the incident. 44 year old dawn died after applying the nerve agent to her skin in july 2018, and it came after the attempted murders of former spy sergei skripal and his daughter yulia and then police officer nick bailey, who were poisoned in salisbury in march that year. and those are the latest gb news headlines. for now, i'm tatiana sanchez. more from me in half an hour for the very latest gb news direct to your smartphone, sign up to news alerts by scanning the qr code or go to gb news .com forward slash alerts . .com forward slash alerts. >> welcome back. so emily and tom are here to tell us what's coming up this afternoon on good afternoon britain. emily. you look like a like a first lady today. >> i do, don't i? >> you could be donald trump's wife in that lucky old me.

>> there's a thought. >> there's a thought. >> lucky old me . >> lucky old me. >> lucky old me. >> we may actually discuss glamorous politician. >> i don't know, ron desantis wife, ron desantis wife. >> there you go. there i am. florida's first lady. >> i'm trying to i'm trying to think of a single example of a glamorous politician. i just can't i mean, back in the day, you could prime minister, the prime minister, keir starmer, back in the day, and then and then we would say to you, is that a lord alli dress? lord alli. >> yeah, yeah. don't reveal my secrets. don't reveal my secrets. don't reveal my secrets. i know you've been talking about these jabs. jabs for jobs, whether this is going to solve our , you know, our to solve our, you know, our jobless issue, our benefits bill. yes. we're going to have someone on who takes quite a different view on all this. disagrees with wes streeting on this, who thinks that our out of work benefits bill has nothing to do really, with obesity , and to do really, with obesity, and this is actually going to cost us because the price of these jabsis us because the price of these jabs is very high. yeah, but but there is no miracle. well, there's the other side to this, right? >> i mean, i think we should be normalising people, having the opfion normalising people, having the option to control their weight. i've always found it very, very to easy not eat food. i don't have a big appetite. i've never had a big appetite. i know some

people find it really , really people find it really, really hard to stop eating and just constantly hungry. you're always eating. yeah, you are always eating. yeah, you are always eating. i make myself eat. he has a little very young. i really do make myself. >> can i just reveal what your pre—show diet is? yeah. okay. so, tom, every single day he gets a ready meal and it's sweet and sour chicken with some egg fried rice. it's at 11:00 in the morning every day. yeah, yeah, monday to friday. >> i started doing that because i was told by by someone because i've been going to the gym and stuff that i need to eat more. you do, you eat more calories. that's something i have, i have you're young and you burn it up. >> as you get older, you won't be able to carry on eating that stuff because you'll put on weight. >> you'll get a tire. that's something i have to consciously do, and i have to think about it. and i can easily skip a meal if i forget to eat. i know some people can't do that, and so having some sort of innovation that allows people to control what they eat much better, normalising that for society is a very good thing. >> tom. tom, it's the

normalising as usual. it's normalising as usual. it's normalising as usual. it's normalising a health issue with a pharmaceutical solution. and i know you're a big fan of that. i'm not a big fan of that. and so we're just giving up. it just means there's a human race. we're just giving up on the idea of personal responsibility , of of personal responsibility, of exercising, of taking control for yourself, of self—esteem, of working out the cause behind why you might eat too much, giving up the genetics, giving up. we're just saying . we're just we're just saying. we're just saying to the drug companies, we're saying to the food companies, we will carry on eating your high sugar, processed food . we'll give you processed food. we'll give you the money to the massive corporations, and then we'll our solution will be more money to the farmers. >> i also have a problem here with the obese person who does go to work, and they would love to take this drug, but they can't afford it, but so they don't get it. but