>> hello, welcome to headliners. we have all of the best of tomorrow's newspapers right here tonight. join us for the next hour to find out if kemi badenoch can out reform reform.

what is the future for gaza and which charity just figured out that maybe associating themselves with furries isn't a particularly good look? i'm josh howie tonight. i'm joined by prom committee co—chairs archie manners and nick dixon, who together will take you through thursday's top stories. this is headliners. but before tomorrow's news, let's go to tonight's headlines. the katie bowen. >> josh thank you. the top stories at 11:00. the governments counter—terrorism prevent programme prematurely closed cases into southport killer axel rudakubana. that's according to the prevent learning review published today, outlining the findings in the house of commons, security minister dan jarvis told mps that the government has begun an

internal review of the prevent thresholds and has accepted all 14 recommendations for improvements in the prevent learning review. ministerjarvis also said that a review into the murderer of conservative mp sir david amess will be released next week. also today, the families of the three nottingham attack victims have demanded a full statutory inquiry, saying names must be named after an independent review has revealed killer valdo calocane fear of needles prevented him from taking anti—psychotic medication before the killings. barnaby webber, grace o'malley—kumar and ian coates were murdered in the summer of 2023 by calocane. health secretary wes streeting says it's clear there were failings in how the care provided to calocane was managed at every level. grace's father, doctor sanjoy kumar, says the loss of our beautiful, brave daughter grace there must be change. barnaby webber's mother has called for a meeting with

the prime minister. a brief bit of breaking news this evening. it's understood that the grenfell tower is set to be demolished. bereaved families of the fire were reportedly told of the fire were reportedly told of the government's decision this evening at a meeting with deputy prime minister angela rayner. however, members of the grenfell united group said that some of the bereaved and survivors are upset about not having their views heard or considered in this decision, saying that angela rayner refused to confirm how many bereaved and survivors had been spoken to in the recent short four week consultation. a government spokesman said the priority for the deputy prime minister is to meet with and write to the bereaved, survivors and the immediate community to let them know of her decision on the future of the grenfell tower. this is a deeply personal matter for all those affected, and the deputy prime minister is committed to keeping their voice at the heart of this. and finally, the prime minister locked heads with kemi badenoch in prime minister's questions

today over the chagos islands deal today over the chagos islands deal. the conservative party leader challenged sir keir starmer on the money being spent, accusing labour of spending money that belongs to our children and their children, labelling it an immoral surrender. the prime minister hit back by arguing that legal certainty was needed over the status of the islands and the strategically important diego garcia military base. those are the latest gb news headlines. now it's time for headliners. >> for the very latest gb news direct to your smartphone, sign up to news alerts by scanning the qr code or go to gbnews.com/alerts. >> thank you katie. hello and welcome to headliners, your first look at tomorrow's top stories. >> with three. >> with three. >> comedians or two comedians and a magician comedian, a funny magician as. >> well a child and i'm a

commentator competition. >> i'm the only one who. >> i'm the only one who. >> does stand up anymore. i'm too busy here. >> oh, well, let's see if we can bnng >> oh, well, let's see if we can bring it all together. we're going to kick off with a look at some of the front pages. first of all, the guardian trump's gaza takeover plan faces global condemnation, of course. the guardian is going to say that the male chemical ban migrants who claim benefits from becoming uk citizens, and the telegraph tories to kick out low paid migrants. more front pages in just a moment. but first, archie, let's go straight into the guardian. we've got some big news here. >> yeah, i mean, it feels like a kind of an episode of black mirror, doesn't it? trump is going to turn gaza what until now, has essentially been a war zone in his mind into the gaza riviera with casinos and a nice waterfront hotel. there are some people, famously, that like to live and be in gaza. he's going to have to move out of the way before he says they're the ones. yeah. they're not very happy about this. they're going to have nowhere to go, which is a long standing problem for them. so i'm not quite sure what he's going to do about that. it's absolutely. i mean, it is sort of it's hilarious. it's very trumpian. he's now saying he might have to put military on

the ground in order to turn it into a casino, and. well. >> he's still saying he's going to turn it into, like, a part of america. >> yes. >> yes. >> he's just. >> he's just. >> going to. >> going to. >> take over. >> take over. >> i think trump, in his time off his four years there, has realised it's all just real estate. he's going to take the panama canal, greenland, canada. why not gaza? so he's just like i'm just going to buy them all. >> i'd love it if he bought my flat. >> yeah, he's playing global monopoly, isn't he? he is essentially just like, yeah, but you can never underestimate trump. it's ostensibly got many absurdities. i mean, he even started it by saying to netanyahu, wow, you really bring him out. look at the numbers, like great numbers for the press conference. and then he went on and said lots of interesting things. it's usual trump. is it madness or genius? he's a disrupter. is it 60 chess? i say it is because if you look at it, a couple of things that he's done here. one, he's put the onus on jordan and egypt and so onus on jordan and egypt and so on to actually do something. he's implied that you guys are going to actually have to do something with this place by saying, i don't know, maybe we'll we'll move these people, we're going to buy it, we'll do something with it. so it kind of puts the onus on other states to get involved. the other thing he did that scott adams pointed out on twitter, it was quite clever, arguably, is he, as adams put it, he talked past the sale,

meaning that the implication is it's up to trump what we do with gaza. so now we're all bickering about what is going to happen to the gazans. but we've all accepted that this is just trump's decision to make. i thought it was quite interesting. >> well, i would say also that one of the other quite genius things that's happened here is that he's exposed this hypocrisy because either the gazans, palestinians there, either they were refugees living in camps or this was their home. so you can't have it one way or you don't get it both ways. if it was their home and they should stay there and that's their country, then why are they constantly bombing israel? and on october 7th, invading israel with the aim to wipe out all of israel? either gaza is their home or it isn't. >> and that's. would the argument be that gaza is their home, but hamas are the ones that are doing that, and they're kind of. >> well, yeah, but they were elected in by the majority of the palestinian. >> people, but they are now going to have lots of nice casinos to go to. well, that's, that's that's. >> also what the big thing it should be said. you mentioned eqypt should be said. you mentioned egypt and jordan. they very,

very clearly do not want any palestinians because palestinians because palestinians in their country before have bought terrorism and instability. >> they've said no completely. they've said quite. >> consistent that egypt did was build a massive wall after october 7th, because they do not want any palestinians coming over because they've been down that road before. that should say something, unfortunately, about what we're dealing with here in terms of a culture that does not fundamentally want peace. and that is the crux of it, to say that. and the starmer has come out and we'll see this in a second and sort of said, no, we should be going back to a two state solution. this is what should be made very clear. palestinians do not want a two state solution. they just want their from the river to the sea. >> but is that hamas or is that palestinians? i mean, is it a case of not all palestinians? >> hamas. hamas were voted in by the palestinians. >> quite a long time ago because they gave up having elections. >> well, this they gave up having ele