how are you? >> how are you? >> how are you? >> it's 3:00 pm. >> it's 3:00 pm. >> welcome to the martin daubney. >> show on gb news. we're broadcasting for you today, live from the heart of westminster and all across the uk. on today's show, britain's top judge has claimed she is deeply troubled about kickback from both sir keir starmer and kemi badenoch over a loophole that allowed six palestinians to claim refugee claim asylum in britain. what is she more concerned with? her words and protecting british citizens now? would you fight for sir keir starmer? that's the big question , starmer? that's the big question, because keir starmer has faced widespread backlash after he said that he's prepared to deploy british troops in ukraine. but with only 11% of the public saying they'd fight for britain. today i'll be asking three army veterans would you fight for keir starmer? and you fight for keir starmer? and you will not want to miss their incredible answers and more farmers fury, because the president of the national farmers union was left with boiling blood after labour party today rejected his plans to

overhaul inheritance tax rules. i'll be joined by the leader of the breakaway movement, farmers for action, who says it's time for action, who says it's time for no compromise action. and is it time to exterminate doctor woke because has tv timelord doctor who regenerated into doctor who regenerated into doctor woke? well, after a fan backlash to write on scripts about racism, sexism and slavery. the latest doctor, ncuti gatwa , is poised to quit ncuti gatwa, is poised to quit and crew claiming to be laid off the show. is it time to exterminate doctor who? that's all coming up on today's show. well, the show always a pleasure to have your company. would you would you fight for keir starmer's britain? a britain which seems unable to control its own borders? a britain that's called brexiteers. racist and thick since 2016. a britain

that calls us far right if we complain about a lack of border control or a changing society in our country. yesterday, keir starmer said he was going to deploy soldiers to the front line soldiers, ostensibly from the white working classes. one of the most demonised demographics in all of the united kingdom. would you take up arms and fight for sir keir starmer's country? get in touch. that's today's big question. i've got three veterans on the show today and they have very, very different takes on this and you will not want to miss what they've got to say. what comes first, king and country or can politics get in the way of that? what would you do? would you fight for keir starmer? get in touch gbnews.com/yoursay. but now it's your headlines and here's katie bowman. >> martin. >> martin. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> and good afternoon. it's 3:03. these are your top stories from the gb newsroom. the us

secretary of state marco rubio and. russia's foreign minister sergei lavrov, have agreed to. >> appoint high level. >> appoint high level. >> teams to begin working. >> teams to begin working. >> on a path to end russia's. >> on a path to end russia's. >> war in ukraine as soon as possible. a kremlin delegate says the us. >> and russia had a positive. >> and russia had a positive. >> constructive for our meeting. >> constructive for our meeting. >> in. >> in. >> saudi arabia about the war. >> saudi arabia about the war. >> rubio also said an end to the conflict. >> must be acceptable to all involved, including ukraine, europe and russia. and speaking a short time ago, president zelenskyy of ukraine has reiterated that negotiations should not take place behind ukraine's back and he has delayed his. visit to saudi arabia. arabia. >> it comes. >> it comes. >> as sir keir starmer said. >> as sir keir starmer said. >> at a meeting. >> at a meeting. >> with european leaders. >> with european leaders. >> in paris. >> in paris. >> yesterday that any ukraine peace deal would require a us backstop. >> to deter russia from. >> to deter russia from. >> attacking ukraine again. >> attacking ukraine again. >> the german chancellor, however, said. discussing sending troops at present was completely premature. >> transport secretary heidi. alexander told gb news. >> we need to find a way to create. >> everlasting peace for ukraine.

>> what we can't have is a situation where there is a temporary pause in hostilities, say, which allows putin to return with a territorial incursion into a sovereign country, which leads to the resumption of aggression. and so i think what keir was doing there was talking to other european leaders. he will be also talking to the us president in the coming days. and he has been clear that we are willing to consider playing our role in the future security of ukraine. but that must be done in partnership with the us. >> while shadow. >> while shadow. >> defence secretary james cartlidge has. >> called for higher defence spending. >> we will stand by the government in supporting ukraine. i think on the specific question of sending in troops, obviously, you know, that raises a lot of questions. we want to know exactly what, for example, the terms of engagement are and so on. but but yeah, we wouldn't

rule that out. is we in the uk need to get on with increasing defence spending is no use talking about it. we have been waiting months now for them to get on with that, and i would urge them to start increasing spending and placing the procurement orders we need so that we can start replenishing the munitions, not least those we've given to ukraine. >> well, in. >> well, in. >> the. >> the. >> last few moments, kemi badenoch has hit back at criticism from the. lady chief justice. >> today. >> today. >> saying that parliament is sovereign. and politicians must. >> be able. >> be able. >> to discuss matters of public importance in parliament. >> the head of the judiciary for. >> england and. >> england and. >> wales said earlier today that she. >> is deeply troubled by an exchange at the latest prime minister's questions between sir keir starmer and kemi badenoch about an immigration tribunal decision. during the exchange, the prime minister said a decision allowing a palestinian family the right to remain in the uk after they applied through a scheme designed for ukrainian refugees, was wrong and home secretary yvette cooper had got her team working on closing this loophole. kemi

badenoch raised the case, describing the decision as completely wrong. the lady chief justice, baroness carr, said she was deeply, deeply troubled to learn of the exchanges between sir keir and miss badenoch. she went on to say it's for the government visibly to respect and protect the independence of the judiciary. >> the decision. >> the decision. >> the decision. >> the british couple detained in iran have been charged with espionage, according to the iranian judiciary news agency. the pair were named by their family as craig and lindsey foreman. the couple, both aged 52, had been on a motorbike trip around the world and had planned to stay in iran for five days before they were detained last month. iranian state media said last week that the couple were in custody in iran's southeastern city of kerman on security related charges. and the secretary of state for energy security and net zero has written to energy watchdog ofgem. as a typical energy bill is set to rise by more than £100

a year. ed miliband has called on ofgem to protect customers as wholesale gas prices have risen by 15% since the last energy price cap was announced. the secretary of state has asked the watchdog to ensure customers do not receive inaccurate bills, and to support those customers in debt. those are the latest gb news headlines. now let's go back to martin. >> thank you katie. now the most seniorjudge in england and wales has written to keir starmer over last week's prime minister's questions, telling reporters she was deeply troubled. well, during pmqs last week, sir keir said a decision allowing a palestinian family the right to remain in the uk after they applied through a scheme designed for ukrainian refugees, was wrong. well, let's get more on this astonishing story now from gb news homeland security editor mark white. mark, welcome to the show. baroness carr claimed to be

deeply troubled by sir keir starmer's comments. the british pubuc starmer's comments. the british public were deeply troubled that palestinians were being allowed into britain via ukrainian refugee scheme. is she not completely missing the point? >> there is no doubt, i think, martin, that this issue is one that has a great deal of resonance in the country and one that rarely brought agreement from both the opposition and indeed the government in the form of the prime minister, saying that the loophole, as they see it being interpreted by this immigration judge, should be closed to ensure that a resettlement scheme that was aimed at bringing ukrainian families over to the uk to give them safety from that war raging in ukraine, should not be exploited in this way to allow a family from gaza to come over. but of course, we've heard there from baroness sue carr that she feels that this was very

troubling. the intervention by these politicians. but i should say there has been a pretty swift response to this. first of all, let's just remind ourselves of what the prime minister said in pmqs last week in response to that question from kemi badenoch. >> mr speaker, let me be clear. i do not agree with the decision. she is right. it 1548 00:09:22,000 --> 00:09