[000:01:20;00] this is the land of wonders. this meeting is the first page of sacrifice. it is over there on the other side of the valley. look, the joy

of meeting is over there. stand up. stand up for the burden of trust. stand up. you have the first page to serve the people . you have a stronghold, and there is hope for you. on the other side of the table are the eyes of a martyr. greetings to you, compatriots. dear ladies and gentlemen, viewers of the first page program yesterday, the head of the supreme judicial council of iraq met with some iranian officials in tehran, including the head of the judiciary of the islamic republic, mr. ajei , and in these meetings, the most important issues in the case of the assassination of martyr haj qasim were discussed.

soleimani and shahid abu mehdi al-muhandis are guests tonight our program is mr. dr. gharibabadi, the secretary of the human rights headquarters of the judiciary, who has come in the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, to your excellency and respected viewers , i say hello, peace be upon you, to begin with , i invite you to see the report when it is ready and then come back in three years. from that international crime, the assassination of general soleimani at the baghdad airport with a pencil was supposed to be the same day, and from 8:30 in the morning i will be the host of martyr haj qasim, so that we can discuss various issues together

. the countries followed the attack a missile at the american base in ain al-assad is a small step on people's wounds. now, after 3 years have passed since that crime, what legal follow-ups have been carried out regarding the perpetrators of the martyrdom of lieutenant general martyr soleimani? mast and kamanazir 1373 there is an immunity package for foreign diplomats that both the americans accept and we accept. this domain of the ministry of foreign affairs can be

taken and there is no problem. on the way they are stonewalling and obstructing the legal follow-up of the case, and the islamic republic of iran is not closed, while we follow all legal paths , even when we announced the responsibility of the american government for these assassinations with an official note , the indictment of those who were responsible for this assassination the assassination of qassem soleimani and the engineer has been indicted for both the perpetrators and the stewards and for those who participated or had assistants in iran. the indictment has been issued. inshallah , those who committed injustice and those who

shed so much innocent blood will receive their own punishment. this we will deliver to the world. mohammad reza sohrabi, radio news agency, mr. dr. gharib abadi, this year, many people ask that after three years and several months, why did we issue a proper request , considering that regarding the case of the assassination of martyr soleimani and abu mahdi al-muhandis at the same time many international lawyers have been interviewed or written about the illegality of this act, and have endorsed it even based on the laws governing the united states of america for the legal and judicial pursuit of the terrorist crime that led to the martyrdom of qassem soleimani, abu mahdi al-muhandis and his companions. three

the solution in front of us is not that we choose from these three solutions, we should have adopted all three ways to deal with this terrorist crime legally and followed up. yes, two courts have jurisdiction here, one of the national courts of iraq has jurisdiction because of its location, and the other is the national courts of the islamic republic of iran , according to the islamic penal code, if crimes have been committed against our nationals abroad. whether those crimes are committed by iranians or non-iranian nationals is up to the courts they are investigating, after the follow-up in the national courts, well, immediately the case

was filed in the framework of the iraqi judicial system, and the criminal case was also established in the framework of the public prosecutor's office and the tehran revolution. the dispute can be done in two ways. in the domestic courts of the united states, the criminals are primarily americans, and all those who are actually the agents or agents of the administration were americans, but the main aspect of the matter is about the americans. one way is actually that the family martyrs actually through hiring a lawyer in the domestic courts of america or filing a lawsuit, this issue is not very simple and trivial, how easy it is for us, for example , to support the families of the victims, to hire a lawyer without filing a lawsuit. naturally

, this is not a suitable solution. ok, the second solution is to file a lawsuit or at least follow up in the american trial using the capacity of the provisions of 1973, which oversees the protection of individuals who are under diplomatic protection. mission two days after the martyrdom of hajj qasim, adel abdul mahdi, the then prime minister of iraq, officially announced in the iraqi parliament that hajj qasim had entered iraq on a mission to preach, and he was supposed

to meet with the prime minister at 8:30 am on the same day for the official response of the islamic republic of iran to the proposal or the letter of saudi arabia, the iraqi minister should present the logical reasons that this assassination failed in that diplomatic effort . we are a member of the 1973 commission, based on the united states there is a jurisdiction after the united states to document first. if it does not document, the second chapter of its own generation should be prosecuted. the content of this convention has been referred late from within the countries and there are many reasons, but in any case , an official letter from a few months ago.

terry sent a diplomatic memo through the following channels to the us government. the islamic republic of iran is against the provisions of the 1973 automation and return it. the list of criminals and criminals was provided to them. i mean this what is the second solution of the us national interest plan, the provisions of the 1973 convention, the legal solution of the chapter, in fact, we can say that this path has been taken because the americans themselves did not pay attention to this issue and the commitments of thomas 1973, the third solution is to use

the death of the 1973 commission is the basis for filing a lawsuit near the international court of justice (icj) in the hague, netherlands . if this does not happen, it means that the talent or trial of this country can be the victim. the arbitration path and these failed to actually refer to international court of justice, this matter is currently on the agenda of the presidential legal assistant, and one of these three solutions is the duty of the judicial system, and the solution is the duty of the government and the legal assembly of the government, that is, pursuing the lawsuit in the american national courts and pursuing the existing plan within the framework of the commission. 1973 in the international court of justice , we provided the necessary support in the judicial system to the executive branch . my path has been covered to some extent, although it is slow, but the path has begun. actually

it was issued after this investigation. in my opinion, i should also explain that there is a certain amount of fear in the process of the case. perhaps part of this delay can be justified. you can see this indictment that was actually issued and the honorable prosecutor of tehran also for the judiciary of tehran province in the year it is strange, in fact, a special judge branch will be appointed to deal with this issue, this work has been done judicially in the main part of kabul and the trial will be from now on 12,000 pages, only the judicial investigation has been done , it will raise 65 cases, only the indictment itself, which is in two you are a model for lying in the criminal court and one for the revolutionary court of crimes and charges are different, about 250 pages, only the volume of this indictment is 12,000 pages, the volume of judicial investigations

of nine countries, the judicial proxies of our judicial system , and also the request for cooperation, the main food of this country, for example, was iraq itself, america itself, and from europe, there were england and germany, and there were some arab countries in the region . from this point of view, we had the uae and documents that showed, for example, that women or some people attributed to this country were involved in terrorism . only iraq answers to parts of this relationship gave food, but the rest of the countries did not respond, unfortunately, which of these countries did not respond, that is, we witnessed the cooperation of some of these countries, in fact, it was not like this, this path should be clear, the path should be mixed, all aspects

of this case should be completely covered. the fact should be opened, send judicial notices to these defendants, see that these american defendants were about 97 defendants, the judicial system should conduct a full investigation for all 97 defendants with the help of judicial officers of the security and intelligence agencies, and the documents should be attached to the case file. your communication will be sent to the court. must can you prove that this person, whom you think escaped, played a role in this operation, there were 97 defendants , in fact, 73 people were summoned to trial and indictments were issued for 24 people , there was not enough evidence for them to be summoned. to the proceedings and the indictment should be issued, so look at the 74 accused accused who are not in the territory because of you and

you should do a huge investigation until it takes time . about two years ago, less than two years ago, the joint food research committee between iran and iraq 4 in this committee, tehran and baghdad held meetings during the past two years, talks, statements were issued, documents were exchanged, after all , it is not the case that if we want to issue only indictments , we should ignore the issues inside iraq, we should document them. we should have the iraqi judicial authorities as well. in this context, it was discussed in sahar bagh that firstly, this process of setting up the indictment and completing the investigation and presentation only asked that you face the actual time. head of

the judicial system and supreme judicial council of iraq in tehran he was present yesterday and in fact today, it was one of the most important topics on the agenda of all his meetings, including for the honorable judiciary , the honorable president and also the honorable speaker of the islamic council, the case was more alive. and the iraqi judicial system should do this as a country, where does it belong? the head of the iraqi judicial council expressed his serious determination in these meetings and condemned this terrorist operation and said that the iraqi judicial system is against the justice of these sentences. the key, in my opinion, is justice for everyone that involvement in this terrorist crime will be implemented regardless of any skin type and title they have or have, and we are looking for this, in

my opinion, it is also the intention and determination that the iraqi judicial system , which clearly declares to the mother that consideration this is important for the american authorities, and for us the second important point is that the judicial system approves the indictment. they arranged to accuse three of the 73 accused it is key and the center of insta is actually key to the three criminal titles considered in the indictment , the first and most important title is in fact the deputy or

participation in a terrorist act leading to intentional murder and the second criminal title is the financing of terrorism and the third one is actually actions contrary to the national security of the islamic republic of iran, inside or outside the country, first of all, what does the terrorist act itself mean, the terrorist act itself, which was really a huge terrorist act, what the americans actually did, but what does this mean from a legal point of view ? for a terrorist operation to murder someone, you make threats, you hide the tools of that criminal act, and you plan to take my life . this is actually the deputy of a criminal act

. participating in such actions, in fact, you are a murderer or a lifer for trump. in fact, according to the actions he took, he directly led this criminal act and admitted to accepting responsibility. his title of accusation in the indictment is participation in a terrorist act, and participation means that trump is a murderer and a murderer . this case is also for mackenzie as the then commander sunnah khawam is the same and hinders participation for pompeo, it is actually a deputy, each of these has its own punishment according to our laws, and the financing of terrorism is actually a philosophy, what is the effective documents provided to the judicial system by our intelligence and security system, i am sorry for this

terrorist act of the american government, about 3 billion the dollar budgeted and spent 20 billion billion dollars. when i found out about it, a great example was created and i studied the file . i saw the documents. there is an american budget . this black budget was included a few minutes before the military, intelligence and security structure of the united states. almost done 77 in 2020, in fact, this terrorist operation was carried out. the budget was 86 billion dollars for intelligence and military operations. 75 % is allocated to information, 25% and 25 to 30% are allocated to military institutions in the budget of 86 billion dollars for one year.

it was good that 3 billions are allocated for big criminals and financing terrorism. we actually have a law on financing terrorism and it was approved by the islamic council several years ago, and this is a criminal act and it is an act against national security. national security and crimes against national security it is also quite clear with what they did about america in the action against the national security of the islamic republic of iran that this action is criminal, but the most important action of tolo is actually punishable by punishment. the message of this issue is that the islamic republic of iran and the republic of iraq is determined that, in fact , baby kifari and baby k are the end of the body in this case, because it is a government in the name of america, which is actually the largest country in terms of financial, political, and military status, and this

will not be a deputy for the republic. islamic iran , our judicial system, and for iraq, we are real experts judge, if a question is raised here, well, now we are dealing with it now. i will give you sample questions of the semester. how does it happen? first, with one year and i will answer. now, if we do not have access to an executive, with a defendant, we must pursue justice . we should postpone the implementation of the laws, because the rulers in different countries always have cases that they do not have access to, but it will not prevent the implementation of justice, so the judicial system of the islamic republic of iran, god willing, demanded that it should be presented in the iraqi judicial system soon, lord

may god create fear in the hearts of those who commit terrorist acts. in any case, it will be issued well, and to implement this law , let's talk about the methods of execution of sentences. after all, you see, in the judicial system, when we issue a sentence , the execution of the sentence is

according to the laws. let's make it simple and for example a person let's send it legally and executively, the islamic republic of iran will go beyond the law to implement the verdicts, but in the end , you see, some of us , for example, are like you . some judgments have been tried and implemented. there are many methods of execution of sentences in this field, but as soon as they realize that these food systems and countries like iran and iraq are determined, there will be a level and it will create deterrence. no criminal should actually be a government. be and what the support of governments he should give himself the courage to commit such crimes again in the islamic republic of iran . in my opinion, this deterrence will happen through our being muslims to pursue and execute justice, that is, if

a verdict is issued, it will be executed, do you believe? it is a hindrance to the lady. let me answer your question with a small example . well, we had not yet started judicial proceedings regarding this case. well , pompeo, why put a very strong protection team , maybe they had nazanin, who was not present, because i felt that it was possible. after all justice is created in one way, well, this terror is their right, they must have this fact , those who are fighting between the commanders of piriz and the commanders of the subway, they killed two ordinary people and martyred them

. they should be killed. this is a terror in their hearts. after this, the least suffering should be protected. well, you can see what will happen when it happens. these should not be about normal life. i committed a huge crime. you saw that in the islamic republic of iran, when it was dawn. it was reflected in the region how people mourned there should really be a very firm and decisive approach to these cases. now you said that iran is taking an illegal action to execute a sentence that will not make it legal . well, this seems logical. at the same time , the leader of the revolution is demanding revenge. they said, and after the ain al-asad incident, they also said that this was the first step, this was a small one, which means that we still haven't

taken harsh revenge and we know it as our legal right. with which to interpret the statements of the supreme leader i would like to say that it should be written explicitly, but this harsh revenge should not be limited to one issue, for example, if the sentence issued against trump is actually implemented, it is better that he is not the only person who was this society, this american government and it is the ruling body of america that is a terrorist breeder and a terrorist breeder who supports terrorism. i remember that the supreme leader and later our high-ranking officials after this assassination actually considered our biggest request to be something, after this crime, the exit of the bases from a very key area. there is an exit of the americans

from your good region. how much do you spend in america? the region that actually expresses and how much pain and suffering for the nations of the region for the countries of the region with the occupation and military aggression and the military invasion of the blood of martyr haj qassem soleimani will cause the americans to experience insecurity in the region and leave the region . a revenge from i don't say that all revenge is hard. they said to the supreme leader that this is it, the different dimensions were the same as al-assad . in less than a few hours, the islamic republic of iran gave the initial response. you see the situation of america and iran in the region the situation is not right and the sign of the blood of the martyrs of the fight against terrorism and the colonization and arrogance of america will lead to their departure, this is muhammad sadiq himself, and also in the iraqi judicial system, it can

be the completion of the same harsh revenge. where did you get to in 1973? it is a very important capacity. we support in the judicial system that the government and the system of the islamic republic of iran file a lawsuit