[000:00:00;00] having it here makes it clear that they formed a government according to the life of the prophet of islam and appointed the caliph and the successor after themselves as god, and based on the nature of the rules of islam, there is a need for an islamic government . it must be the same . do not say goodbye to the viewers of channel one tv . stay with us on khabar network, ayatollah motahari refers to what is in the life and thoughts of imam khomeini, may god have mercy on him, and

i said that the idea of ​​islamic government was in the imam from the beginning and they compiled themselves based on the life of the prophet of islam. formed and replaced they determined from god and based on the nature of islamic rulings in financial affairs, for example, we have to do things that we have a penalty for. there is a state of mind in islam that cannot be implemented and implemented except with the islamic government. for this idea, it existed in iran , but their actions and social movements were not such that, for example, they wanted to carry out the last islamic government in any way possible, but

they paid attention to the social conditions and at any point they actually did their duty and said that we are assigned to we are doing our homework and we are not usually satisfied with the results reza at every stage because they did their work, the first stage of the story of the state and provincial associations was that the shah's government brought a layer and it was during the period of science in the majlis that the students were told to swear by the holy book instead of the qur'an, and that's it. the issue of women's voting was that, well, when many authorities opposed this bill to the imam, in fact, during this period, actors also voiced their opinions, in fact, he opposed this bill

, although, for example, the opinion of imam khaliq was not the opinion of the imam for women, but because it was a collective work, the imam's name is also there, and they disagreed until the next stage for example, it happened after the white revolution that shah dar took his place and he raised the issue of land reforms, and here and there the imam was almost together , still the imam of the state of independence in such a way that it was not found to be in a separate voice from others until we came to the amendment of this law of capitulation to inquire that this was really not compatible with the dignity and honor of the people of iran. here, the imam

entered the field almost alone and they strongly opposed it, and before this he gave birth. on june 15th , they had changed, but this time, the imam became a reality going to turkey and iraq and so on, but i want to say that imam actually entered wherever he felt that he would take action here, now what will happen next and so called trust in god, and when they had an islamic government, but they were careful that it must be possible to do this, he was doing more of the task, but

it was god's providence that finally led to the revolution and the islamic republic system. when and with ant reactions start as capitulation they pointed out and some say that the turning point of the story is the story of capitulation. i agree, before i get to this so-called capitulation , i would like you to see that the imam was a cleric who was fully aware of religious and islamic principles with very progressive views of islam. progressive in its true sense and they acted based on their own perceptions, in fact

they did their duty, they did their duty, the origin of the imam is in the field, and the religious thought in their path of movement naturally entered the political field based on the same perceptions they have of islam. it can mean he was a politician if he had studied in other places and had these and then of course religious motivations. the path of politics was crossing at that time and after that you had different perceptions of islam. there was a man

, and they had the imam, and a group of his companions and like-minded people also had the views of young morteza, and even now there is peace in the world. we see from these perceptions of morteza javan 97, for example, in the hozah the problem of waiting. one interpretation of the problem of waiting is to sit and put our hands on our hands until hazrat hojjat appears and do his own work . it crosses the path of politics. this will happen whether you like it or not. if our understanding of islam is the progressive understanding that you mentioned about the issue of capitulation, the imam said

that before he entered the field of politics based on the same act, they felt that islam iran as a country is in danger it is in danger of foreign dependence and it is under a danger, but not entering the stage of capitulation based on the same religious theory that they had was really a surprising issue, that is , the americans wanted to expand their military sphere in iran and based on the advisory agreements that to increase the number of their forces in iran, they sought to

make these military personnel completely immune to any legal action in iran, and therefore the issue of capitulation of the right of consular judgment, which was related only to diplomats, was therefore this is what i wanted to speed up the military forces themselves. you can see here that this is a disaster , a kicking of the honor of the iranian army, a kicking of the honor of the iranian nation, based on their own islamic point of view, which derives its content from the text of the koran. for example, let's assume that the rule of negating a mustache is that infidels have mastered the way of closing water among muslims. the imam here entered the issue based on his divine duty and of course he bravely

stood up to this issue, and naturally this issue caused conflict and he was exiled from iran. let's see the report, come back dead to political thoughts and the social character of the late founder of the islamic republic of iran, the discussion was rooted in one source in the islamic society of iran in the early 1940s and the beginning of a revolution among the people of biston . the difference lies in the answer to this question and in the form of kurdish religion.

in this way, he got a prominent name. this is a spiritual world. you have become a political literary text and you do not act on this religious figure, but he is a political figure. islam is a political religion, and politics is the rule of shaba, the other rules of worship, and i am still practicing religion. that i left the religion in this revolution, a jurist will practice the religion kurds and this same religion like a magnet has gathered the people of iran around itself. your coward has gathered all the people around itself. relying on the power of divine language is another secret that distinguishes iranian revolutionaries from others

. there is no precedent in the history of the world, islam and the people become a revolution, from which this system of the islamic republic emerges . the islamic republic and the democratic republic are broken . according to the vote of the nation itself, the law of the martyred nation

the revolution discredits whatever the power of the people is valid from the world powers . his view on membar and religious issues was different from other scholars . beiri of sed and sima news agency. thank you all for preparing this clean report about the reactions of contemporary scholars of imam rahal bagin to this view of political activists who are against imam rahal's stance and the strength of their reactions. hadrat imam had some arguments , what answers did he give in front of these arguments?

look at the stage where almost all the scholars were together, that is, at the very beginning , they were not separated very easily. whatever i did, in this story, the state and provincial associations, all the scholars rose up and opposed it, and gen shaghlam was forced to sit down. later , it was about the same in the story of the white revolution. again, almost everyone was together, but after the story, bye bye, the captain was there, maybe the rest of the authorities and scholars might have sensed the danger or they did not have the time to enter the story, here the imam stood up almost alone and gave a speech on the discussion. exciting did that lead to

he was exiled. you see, the rest of these elements were not in a way to say, for example, that they had a wrong idea, and this was also recognized by everyone in a way . will lead to the extinction of the seminary, the efforts that were made from the period of the islamic lovers of abdul karim abdul karim shirazi to karim haideh shiraz yazdi , which had been done since the period of reza shah until today , will be wasted, for example, the language the late

ayatollah borujerdi has finally confronted the politics of confrontation it was not, and during this period, imam khomeini was completely supportive, even they played an effective role in bringing them from borujerd to qom, and whatever happens, if there is a difference of opinion, we do not accept this as the reason for the plan of others and the perfection of the imam, a difference of opinion. and there was a difference of opinion and they said that islam can be preserved better in this way and what were we waiting for, that not only should we have another way , here we should stand firm, for example, this way , in fact, the clergy is almost of the same cloth , but well finally, among the scholars

, there were people who did not agree with this method of imam they were worried that one day the fundamental principle of the seminary and the clergy would be overturned. therefore, of course, the closer we get to the victory of the revolution , the more people will find the path of the imam, the so-called , pure faith. let's take a look at imam khomeini's political and social character and struggles. what are the most special scenes for you? i would like to make the best scene before the nesteran revolution , when gen shah came

and turned islam into imperial history. they gave it very well they warned that the shah's regime had awakened the people, and people felt that the shah's regime was really standing against islam . in fact, it was one of the mistakes of the shah's regime . salah paid attention to the rules of islam. in my opinion, overthrowing the shah's regime was not an easy task. the mistake that the shah's regime made was to change islamic history to the monarchy and secondly to promote corruption and prostitution. the people felt that they were standing against islam without a shawl, and in fact, the religious feelings

of the people of jarihah were hurt . it had been hanged, so when the imam continued he gave and informed the people, they entered the field very easily. in 1956, the new period of the islamic movement had started . it was not yet fully known to the people . in fact, he used this level as the best quote and i remember it was the first of farvardin in 1955 355, we were at home, the year they were delivered, the beginning of 2535

shahshahi. it happened this year instead of having to take it from the water and little by little with announcements the imam and the awareness-raising, aghaz shahin broumand, was an interesting event. we are talking about the imam and the social after the victory of the islamic revolution and the works , blessings and examples that he created behind this look and character in cooperation and a different look of currents and even social look. the political activist of the imam made many things that seemed impossible possible, in fact, the imam is a character who

turns the imagined impossible into the forbidden , with a clear example is the departure of the shah, that is, imam mahdi, who was the pahlavi regime. it is completely dependent on various political and military spheres economic, cultural and imam, after giving advice to the first companion, i believe that from the position of the governorship, advise the king not to be so subservient to israel so that he is not to america, and then no more , these advices will not go anywhere, and the real issue of capitulation and issues

the imam has the islamic government, and following this departure of the shah, the departure of the shah, when the prominent imam was at that time , there were not a few people who said that it is impossible, or that you are talking about the impossible. is such a thing possible ? it will be possible to god, it will be possible for the era after look at the same political activist's view, well, in the period after the revolution, in any case, considering the events that happened and the riots that were initially caused by america's interference, which ultimately led to your presence, the capture of the espionage den before that. the americans had started their own sanctions and pressures because of lack of water, after

that they cut off the relationship with them and were terrified that it is possible to continue our political life with the so-called relationship with america and in contradiction and confrontation with the islamic america. the imam said that yes it is possible , it was really impossible in terms of the claim, except that it is blood the slogan that imam put forward in his speech under the title of this eastern not western which later became and this slogan is neither eastern nor western of the islamic republic . as

an impossible thought , the great pole interest in the name of america and the west and the big and strong capitalism in the name of the soviet union and its allies and the whole world was proposed. from islam above, my head goes through the world of politics here and on this way my mind came to me and it opens, just a bad slogan during the non-aligned movement was more of a slogan because the same non-aligned ones, when you check the number of them , told the imam that no, it really

happened in the same way and this happened, and let's count on the issue of numbers, when it happened, we are good at history. we don't have a history in this field. we were attacked again in 1320 and there was another behavior. as soon as foreign forces entered our country from some direction, the first person in the country fled and fled, and here the imam said that we stand. and we resist. some people said, how is it possible while in a really rare event, at that time, the west and the east agreed on supporting saddam and they supported him. how could he resist? the imam said that it is possible to resist and i want to do it with such a kiss that the imam will make many of these

impossible things possible. and we who were once in the field of construction issues, in the field of power plants, in the field of shipping, in the field of industry and military issues, and all these were really 100% dependent from zero to one hundred, with this view of the imam, which was taken from the text of islam, we reached a point where, of course, we had and are having problems, there is no doubt about it, i want to install it we have reached the point where we are now among the first countries in the world in many of these fields, as well as among the best iranians from the perspective of the imam and the vision of our

imam for the country and the nation . imam rahel's character, political and social character and what made them draw towards the imam in the film two minutes, the best martyr motahari is actually the one who discovered the imam, that is, you can find him, he was the first person who is a great character, according to the late ayat allah montazeri says that he said that during this period, mr. motahari told me that the seminary still does not recognize the imam and in the future the imam will flourish in the seminary. it was a period that no one knows yet, and one of the characteristics of shahid motahari is that

he is a great man . it was imam khomeini who actually prepared the preparations for his authority, and he was a student of imam imam for 12 years, and he went back and forth to hajj , and it was clear from imam's message that how much i was interested in the holy martyr, who was torn apart, was the result of my life, and from this naturally, there was a tendency towards imam khomeini and a great influence on the personality of martyr motahari the introduction of the book causes of tendency to other's property they say that the moral lessons that they had for me and for us, i attended, were very effective in my soul, and

until the next week, it was like this again. you said, do you remember when my father told me that the time when the people of azerbaijan were found, like peshwari, and those who wanted to separate azerbaijan from iran said that the imam said at that time, who is the authority to imitate , who will influence you now in this incident, but at that time, they were still known as references it didn't happen, that is, my soul was like this from the beginning, and they had such a spirit , and talking about martyr motahari imam is a very good opportunity to

examine the way of life of imam rahal, the late founder of the islamic republic of iran, from different dimensions and angles. again, the host at the beginning of the special news interview and both of you, goodbye and thanks to everyone, thank you very much, in the name of god, the merciful, the merciful. hello , dear viewers, ladies and gentlemen . i am happy and at your service. let's talk about the persepolis team, the champion of the competitions. league