[000:00:00;00] mrs. mohammad beigi, hello, have a good time, in the name of god, the most merciful, the most merciful, hello, good night, and my condolences on the muharram days, and respect for all the dear viewers, and thanks to mrs. mohammad beigi, what you have given me from the requests of the guests of the program, and the best of it to the deputy attorney general of the country, mr. khorramabadi. of course, those who express their personal opinions and believe that the existing laws are good laws, of course, there have been criticisms of some cases, but the new bill contains the necessary points in some parts , and in some areas, even the role of

power and his excellency's opinion reduces the authority of the police let's hear about the good layer. see, the bill needed a bigger job . of course, we criticize the performance of the government and the judiciary, which sent the western bill to the parliament from the beginning, and the work of the parliament became heavier, but in the parliament, the colleagues who speak humanely are the judiciary. that different experts from different research institutes and think tanks tried to make some of this bill finally respond to the demands of today 's people

. iran is related to hijab they consider it an important value and for the strength of his family, he insists that, despite alhamdulillah , in the second series in the parliament, about 50 cultural articles will be added to the supreme resolution 826 of the cultural revolution. it found a way through this way, but these were not the first, and the materials were shorter or in the form of one sentence

, the approvals of 32 institutions of the cultural revolution were allocated as allocations. chopped and brought about people, there is still ambiguity, like if a person in the game became a debtor to germany, and in such cases, we have it, or in article 59, which states that assault can be considered an unauthorized photo and assault, these should also be specified, and we are culture-building materials. look at

the place of educational materials. in this law, for example, the assignments of the education system and the assignments of the country's education system, for example, new lesson plans , new educational fields, post-graduate doctor, as a field in fisa, prostitution, did you deal with these things , for example, the absence of culture, the solution to educational problems. or the ambiguities that still exist or the discussion the executive guarantee and the ability to implement the birth of the good layer, why are these in the process of dealing with the payment of sand? this is only the legal and judicial commission, in fact, it is now dealing with the law in the form of assistance to people as proposers. they can only

be present in the committee. a joint film was formed for the proposals of the representatives of the film. more comments were made from the members of the isfahan parliament, which was a good feeling, but not satisfactory. the whole society there are no opponents, it can be done with training, it can be done with these things that have not been seen in the layer, thank you very much, mrs. mohammad beigi, thank you, mr. khorramabadi, let's hear the opinion of hazrat ali in the area of ​​the issues that were raised , to be on the first side, to implement the ambiguities that exist

, and the debate is empty instead of culture building. and the educational materials in this bill were very good, they said, "i forgot, the honorable judiciary, the first deputy of the judiciary and the president, they all said that with the current laws, it is possible to detect the hijab , deal with the removal of the hijab, and

issue many directives as it causes our problems and this is true the only problem was that you did not inspect the experts. please show me what your expert opinion is. what are our current laws and this legal bill is problematic. unfortunately, the legal bill is written in the direction of not only fighting.

it is not with the discovery of hijab, but the encouragement of the discoverers of hijab in article 64. it says that if someone who orders the hijab acts aggressively , we would like to impose a fine on the person who is ordered to do the hijab.

we did not have any problems with promiscuity a lot for mr. khorramabadi, khorramabadi, khorramabadi , many khorramabadi people come up with one question . let him deal with misogyny and the discovery of hijab, and there is no need to pass a new bill for it, but from there we ask why the judicial flashlight of taha and the inspection law have not been implemented . maybe he has not fulfilled his duties. it did not reach here and there was no need to pass a new bill what is your answer? ask the judiciary to do it. i should not answer this case. the issue

is weighing . it will solve our problems in the field of chastity and hijab. this next step is the basis of the first step .

do you believe that there is no need to deal with this situation, which is known as khorramabadi province, instead of mr. khorramabadi ? it had something to do with going to make a decision they say that the president and the head of the judiciary are enough between the current laws . the head of the judiciary has written a bill to the president . or islamic iran in the field of famous and prohibition of evil, name the famous agent should not be aggressive, this is the most important correct word, we live in it with 90 million people , 70 million people live in it , what

do these 20 million people say in a conflict or problem? i want to come out as i like a world that you like, you want to come out. this is what happened. there is a challenge among some people towards the whole population. for example , regarding the command and prohibition of hijab in article 64, the sentence of the supreme leader means the words that are said about the good and the forbidding of the bad. it should be aggressive. it is really embarrassing. i am very ashamed that the deputy attorney general of the country says why did you bring it to be aggressive. article 64 of giga is based on sharia principles and article 8 of the constitution. covering and hijab is for all people and no one can be blamed doing what is obligatory

according to shari'ah , enjoining good and forbidding evil must be done with kindness and tolerance. they believe that the person who is enjoining the good and forbidding the evil must be so strong that he can not be aggressive, and contrary to your opinion, article 64 is here as it is. the income for you is a layer, they themselves ask another point , no one will ever get it, including my mr. khorramabadi

pay attention, they say that it should be nice to enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil, who does not say such a thing in the process of what is done and forbid what is evil? the one who is having an argument on this side of the administration makes the matter famous or prohibits the negative immediately in most cases, now i won't say all, but the other side becomes so aggressive, we make it famous for this matter, come and see this, that is, in different places. messages are coming from different cities, clips are coming out, reminding both sides of gentleness and tolerance it leads to insulting the hijab on the part of the other person, so for someone who does not enjoin the good and forbid the evil, we have already forgotten, with the same

conditions, consider the sixth degree fine . i am surprised, it means accusing others of let's say that they say that there is nothing wrong with aggression, someone is definitely doing something to be famous, he is definitely linking it with his language . another point here is that if there is a possibility of effect, every thing is good and forbidding the bad. the supreme leader said that the condition is that if it can be proven, then the role whose feet are open to these courts? enjoining the good and forbidding the evil must be done, but for the person who is ordering the good, a fine of the sixth degree is determined, here is a surprise and the most important thing is that there was nothing like this in the commission , the talks that it was made and this is not the commission's decision because some questions have been raised, how

could such a decision be reached in the judicial commission and the members of the judicial commission agreed to hear mr. khorramabadi's assembly and the point that is related to masoud 's direct discussion. different devices that if according to the law don't act, and in any case according to the law, the punishments are considered for them in relation to this. in conclusion, i think of you alone. from mr. mohibi's speech, i never know how to act aggressively in front of all the viewers and you.

and i apologize, mrs. lajurdi said that we should know for ourselves that the vast majority of our famous and forbidden people will become a crime. you added with the last words of the supreme leader, you wanted to block the comment the representatives of the judicial commission clarified that, unfortunately, he came here and said that if in any case the institutions

that provide recreational and tourism facilities are at the disposal of the people , they will be punished for providing services to the people. for the judicial system, unfortunately, it has become so much in all this field , i mean, i would like to tell you, as a system, the organizers of this bill undermined the sovereignty

and raised the trophy of hijab . increasing the punishment, the police cannot take it well, and this

photo is with a three-month hijab. it takes four years it's not me. it takes a long time for the work of an expert. it takes a long time to study and the law will not be implemented. look at the media. the current commander of the judiciary is studying to deal with the honorable first vice president immediately. we wanted the parliament to fix the shortcomings. and they let it go, i say thank you very much mr. khorramabadi and also mrs. mohammad beigi and i thank both of them, mr. mohebi and mrs. eshraghi, but well, as it

comes from the guests' speeches , there are different opinions that can be found in the news reports. follow up on this issue, thank you very much the program is over, god willing, we will be at your service in the next

posts , dear ones, and we are especially grateful for your participation in the special news conversation tonight. i am happy for you . the former president of the united states and the candidate for the next presidential election of this country, who now faces two completely different paths due to the issuance of a new indictment against him, either he wins the election and returns to the white house, or he loses, he ends up in prison, or the 2024 election is a game of death. trump's life has become azadeh taheri's report, we see the tooth bracket he is so popular that he can shoot to the level of 5th avenue and even the opinion of a voter and

i will not return. burr faces a long list of lawsuits the biden administration is the most egregious abuse of power in the country's history, with at least 78 charges in four felony cases that include trading and paying the right to remain silent to sway state election results. georgia floor record keeping it has been classified and this is the last but the most important one to change the result of the 2020 election. today an indictment

was issued for donald trump for conspiracy to defraud the united states of america and conspiracy to change the result of the election. it all started here when the result of the kazakh presidential election did not please the loser. we are all because we want to win the elections stolen by radical democrats . a man to sentence 77 years to such a long period of imprisonment. trump's campaign

considers the food prosecutions to be an influence on the results of next year's presidential election. it should be placed in the shoulder in the conditions issued that tehran is the leader in the survey and the trust in the report of the 6th committee of ghazawieh's political angle, the street of trump supporters is the 6th lesson of 2020 and was able to change the result of the previous us presidential election. now we have to see if it can in result may the elections be effective. azadeh taheri of the radio and television news agency. tonight we are at the service of mr. ali najafipour and mehrdad halalkhor, both of whom are experts in american issues. first, an overview of the backgrounds of my two guests. ali najafipour, an expert in american issues

, was born in tehran in 1367 and studied he completed his bachelor's degree at allameh tabatabai university and his master's degree at shahid beheshti university in the field of english language and literature. he is interested in researching foreign policy and international affairs, especially in the field of american domestic policy with a specific focus and its elections in 2016. for the second time to he graduated from the master's degree in international relations at the university of tehran and is currently a doctoral student at the university of tehran. halal khor, an expert on american issues , born in 1366

, completed his master's degree in political science and international relations and a doctorate in north american studies at the university of tehran. he was from the university of tehran, and now he is a professor at the university of tehran in courses related to international relations and american issues. he is a consultant in the expediency recognition council . he was a former consultant at the presidential research center . the international function for the foreign policy of the united states. this researcher has written several articles, including the article on the american foreign policy regarding iran during the obama era . his article on the role of sanctions in the american foreign policy has been published in domestic publications. tonight's conversation is with mr. najafipour. i will start with the accusations that are raised against trump every few days and yesterday also

led to the issuance of the third indictment against him. do you know this is a natural process in the american judicial system ? they are using the title as a political tool to remove a competitor like trump from the scene. first of all , there is no true issue regarding the food value of these three cases that are now being seen. regarding the new york case, my judgment is that the new york case is more political than this case. because of the money that is given to each individual he had paid this case, first of all, it is not clear from the legal point of view whether it is within the jurisdiction of the prosecutor of the manhattan district of new york to pursue it or not, and

it is also not known whether the elapsed time period includes the passage of time or not. therefore, i think this case is political, of course not. that it was a behind-the-scenes process and that the new york prosecutor himself, that is, the manhattan district attorney in new york, probably has political ambitions, later he may want to run for elected positions, and in this way he wants to gain the positive opinion of the people of new york, who are mostly liberal and in favor of the democratic party. first winner you don't know that it is very important, at least in my opinion, the political side of shajarian is much stronger than the legal side, but in the case of these two cases, one of the confidential documents that came and one of the cases related to

social events, both of them were brought by special investigator jack smith. these are both very old cases from a legal point of view, i.e., the text of the indictment of the second one was 45 pages long, which means that it is the third . in fact, reading the text of the indictment, we see that it is very well-founded, a lot of documents have been covered . it was political if it is a political year, especially in this case of the glass of january, a political activist, why is it so bad, why did the attorney general of the united states leave the united states for two years to pass, and it is possible that this branch, which i have, is interfering in the elections