[000:00:00;00] i will send this photo through your service to the civil registry, then identify it to the judicial branch, the judicial branch, the judicial branch, in the current language, which, in addition to

what it had done , will do a lot of things in the judicial branch. because the points raised in the bill submitted by the judicial branch as objections to the judicial commission of the parliament, in the same way, that is , the bill submitted by the judicial branch, have actually increased the fines , reduced the authority of the police in documenting, and issues of this kind. what happened, what is the difference between the sent bill the difference here is that there, for example, the police first gives a warning, then this warning is taken away from him with an online fine without interfering . khorramabadi's followers believe that the police should not

have their powers reduced. it is reflected in the preparation of the judicial bill, what has happened there now is that the overall conclusion has been reached that the judiciary itself has come to this conclusion, that is , the drafters of the judicial bill have come to the conclusion that the confrontation between the people and the police during the irshad patrol is harmful and must go somewhere. this is another thought now another idea is that there should be a heavy punishment that would be a deterrent. one time is like ms. lajordi who told the police to change this, but if the punishment is small , i don't think it will be a deterrent. first of all, warning and deterrence, i don't know what they were saying, one million tomans is a 8th degree fine or one and a half million tomans is still there now, that is, now the judiciary

is not bound to take one and a half tomans, besides , we have seen a lot of 4 million tomans and the maximum 6th degree fine the product of 550 million tomans was not approved that is, with the consensus that was approved for 24 million tomans with the officials of the judicial branch, they said one thing about the authorities of the officers, that officers like the mobilization officers have been reduced for them, the law on judicial protection of the mobilization of the laws related to special officers mentioned in article 29 of the criminal procedure law the only difference is that now the police can no longer make arrests, they have to document

it and give it to the authority and the court to be careful, they can't do this either, but this police has all those other powers regarding nudity and nudity . and i don't have any arrests the system has come to the conclusion that it has to find another way . the judiciary in the bill that it sent also instructed that these fines are only a difference between the police and the ninja . two people are not equal, but when you go through a red light, it doesn't matter. for example, my child , you have a land cruiser, we have a 206. it doesn't matter, in any case, we will fine a child a thousand tomans.

it may require a discount, it may require formation ok, he may have done it a few times, these rules are few and the number of individual men is small, it is possible that one person commits to the court, you can be sure that he will commit this sentence, he may even lower the punishment by a million tomans , i cannot do the punishment by the police, the sentence will be carried out, and mrs. fatemeh mohammad beigi a member of parliament is added to our group, mrs. mohammad bigi. hello, have a good time. in the name of god, the most merciful, the most merciful. greetings and greetings. good night. condolences on the muharram days and respect for the service of all the dear ones. mrs. mohammad bigi is doing what the guests of the program said. now to the deputy attorney general mr. khorramabadi's country is of course a decree that they express their personal opinions and believe that the existing laws were good laws, of course not

in some cases, but the new bill in some areas that needs attention and in some areas even that it reduces the role of the power and authority of the police. let's hear your highness's opinion regarding the first layer. of course, we criticize the performance of the government and the judiciary .

the amount of this bill was tried to respond to today's metal ok people, all families are demanding a legal bond in the field of chastity and hijab, those who wear hijab, those who apparently think it is very important for them in the surveys to show the people of iran about hijab and chastity positively and they value it and for the strength of the family. it is adamant that in the second series of the presence in the parliament, 50 articles of cultural norms approved by the supreme council of the cultural revolution will be added

. in the form of one sentence, a total of 32 devices have been approved the cultural revolution was allocated as an allocation. the second point is that the ability to implement this important treatment law from the people's point of view. the device is almost crushed and crushed and brought to the people.

billiards, for example, became in debt and then something happens. article 57 belongs to the title, it can be given a warning, or vice versa , if he assaults a non-veiled person, these are ambiguous. it should be specified that he needs cultural materials. see, the place for educational materials in this law is empty, for example , the tasks of the education department. and system assignments education, new curriculum plans, new fields of education, post-graduate doctorate should be added as a field of study , ms. mohammad beigi, your approach in the bill was addressed in the parliament. why did we deal with the birth of layers in the process, because only the legal and judicial commission

is actually dealing with the law now, in the form of assistance to people as proposers, they can only appear in the committee, now the bill has just been submitted, the commission representative shared opinion there have been more members of the parliament, but it is not satisfactory how to deal with the deputies and opponents, and then with people who are in the general category of society , i do not

agree or disagree with them. khorramabadi, let's hear the opinion of hazrat ali in the area of ​​the issues that were raised, to be on the first side, to the ability to implement, the ambiguities that exist, the discussion of the lack of place for culture and educational materials in this bill, i will consume very good materials , i will serve, i forgot this issue, i will get you. in the institution of the honorable presidency of the judiciary and the president the president said that it is easy to solve the problem with the current laws and said that it is a fact and i have studied many laws and regulations about the hijab and chastity and many directives

. yes, i know that this law causes our problems. and you didn't inspect the other man, he takes his wife from the experts. now, in the capacity of this statement, the expert who said give your opinion , what is your expertise? the topic of this meeting is that our laws are currently in place and this legal bill will solve the problem. unfortunately,

the bill legally written only fight discovery it is not a hijab, but encourage the discoverers of your hijab. in article 64, it says that if someone who commands public opinion, he should wear his feathers

. which was not a problem, this bill created a lot of problems for mr. khorramabadi, khorramabadi, with a question, i will talk to you . there is no need for him to deal with wearing hijab and uncovering hijab that we approve a new bill, but from there we ask what was the reason, so why was the judicial flashlight not implemented and did not perform the inspection, maybe he did not fulfill his duties, if

he did, the situation would not have reached this point and there was no need to use a layer what is your answer? i think that in this regard, you want us to take the responsibility of the judiciary .

do you believe that the bill is there or not, you can change it if you need to there is no such situation as he is lying. if you fly, which one will be forgotten? khorram abad air is one of the attractions of khorram abad . what was the need for us to go? the president decided that food among the current laws was enough. the head of the judiciary has written a bill to the president.

these words are not expert or islamic words in iran, you wrote in the field of famous and prohibition of negation that pregnant women should not be aggressive . this is the most important thing. 90 million people live there, 70 million people live there, these 20 million people live in the middle of the conflict. let me come out to a world that you like. you want to come out. something has happened. there is a challenge among some people towards the whole population, one of which is, for example , regarding the command and prohibition of hijab in article 64 of the sentence of the supreme leader. these words are said about the famous and the forbidding of the bad should be aggressive

it's really embarrassing. i'm very ashamed that the deputy attorney general of the country is actually saying why he shouldn't be aggressive. according to the principles of shariah and the eighth principle of the constitution , it is the duty of all people to promote good and to forbid evil. no one can be blamed for doing what is obligatory in the shari'ah, the good and the forbidding of the bad must be done with kindness and tolerance, the consequences are opposite , give and take and riot, what they are doing, they both get fined, why should we eliminate it, but some believe that the authority the one who is enjoining the good and forbidding the evil must be so don't be aggressive and disagree with your opinion on article 64 in such a way that after

that there was no discussion in the commission, we had no doubts, what happened that it has become like this, they are a layer for you, the question is another point. they tell me that attention should be aggressive, no one says such a thing, but now in the process of this matter of good and forbidding in the society , we can see that with the very first conversation and with each other, the softness and tolerance he has there is a discussion about whether the administration is going to publicize or forbid what is to be denied i will tell you, but the other side is so aggressive, we have a trick for someone who wants to be famous, come and see this, that is , messages are coming in different places, clips are

coming out, which gently and tolerantly warns both sides , the law of the other side let him be aggressive and even lead to insulting and pulling the hijab on behalf of the other person, so for someone who does not enjoin good and forbid evil, we have just forgotten about it. with the same conditions , consider the 6th degree of monetary punishment. i am surprised. to do it means to do it to others who say they should be aggressive and so on there is never such a thing, surely someone is ordering the good, he must link it with the language, here is another point, if there is a possibility of an effect, any order for the good and forbidding the evil is definitely the possibility of the drug's effect, and the supreme leader said, provided that if so, how can it be proven? for whom are these courts open? enjoining the good and

forbidding the evil should be done with the conditions, but the fact that a monetary penalty is determined for the person who is ordering the good is surprising here, and the more important thing is that such a thing is at all in the commission in this way. there was no discussion and this is not the decision of the commission because for some people, the question is how did such a resolution come from a parliament in the approval committee of the judicial commission, and the members of the judicial commission mr. khorramabadi, let us hear from his highness, and the point that is related to the discussion of masoud directly in the various institutions that if they do not follow the law and in any case, they should document the punishments considered against them according to the law. in summing up

, i think that i am delusional from the way mr. mohebi speaks. i attribute and i beg you that i am saying this, they said themselves let us know that the vast majority of the famous and forbidding our disbelievers should be a crime for raising my voice and the other person was aggressive towards me

. according to the representatives of the judicial commission, you said that if the institutions that provide recreational and tourism facilities to people are sentenced to serve people, they will face the problems of tomorrow in a recruitment center to

discover hijab and in all this field so much. weakening

the sovereignty and raising the trophy is adding a lot it can't work for us, it doesn't matter that the expertise takes a long time and the law won't be enforced. it's not my

case , you should look at the media. thank you very much, mr. khorramabadi and also mrs. mohammad bigi . follow up . thank you very much, dear sir. the program is over god willing, we will be at your service in the next posts, dear ones, and we are especially grateful for your participation

in the special conversation tonight. i am happy for you . i am a son and my mother

. i love the export flag . he suggested that you should say hello again. give it to me. it is not me . we can quickly prepare the agrin electric meat grinder with speed and without additional fees. the adrian electric meat grinder has a steel body and steel blades and can adjust the speed easily and quickly. we prepare dietary sauces and food for you water electric meat grinder, we can cook very quickly and easily all kinds of healthy puree and cutlets and enjoy the unique texture of the food. enjoyable cooking, easy and fast. to what number should we send the number 6 and

get the aquarium electric meat grinder delivered to your home with free delivery? gushkob electric iphone, fast and professional companion of your kitchen, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, may god bless muhammad and the family of muhammad, at 6:00 a.m. america, to explain the charges in this legal case, yesterday with god's private plane, donald trump became the candidate of the republican party since the beginning of the election campaign. so far , it has been arranged in three separate projects to try for iftar