[000:00:00;00] some of them came back and took good pictures, and some of them did not come back because we sent them to engage the iron dome and their patriot missiles, and sometimes the iron dome was unable to target these objects. use other weapons. and this is a daily job. every day, a drone or two drones or three drones, these are other than attack drones that fly in the middle of lebanon.

this is good, this is worthy. in the past few days, we have seen a new wave of threats by netanyahu and others about lebanon, and the cause of this is their increased concerns about the events of this front and its quantitative and qualitative progress. we will continue with this position, and just like on friday, i once again appreciate the mujahideen, resistance forces, those who are present, especially in the front line and in all resistance bases, i appreciate

this welcome. that direct. the general position in lebanon, which declares solidarity with gaza, with the oppressed people of gaza, and affirms lema tawam to the islamic resistance, the work of the palestinian resistance in southern lebanon, with the exception of some hundreds and bases , which if we compare with these lebanese and national political groups, these are very rare voices , in fact very few and limited, i do not want to address this issue and interpret it.

this general stance is a mixed and strong supporting stance and it is good that this is the front that speaks in lebanon . in this battle, this battle is not like other battles. he speaks, and after that, you don't have to act the words that are issued from us, in general, if we want to sum up this general scene that started in gaza, it started in the west bank, in yemen

, in iraq, in iran, in syria, and in lebanon, and in mecca, there are resistance movements that need it. , when it helps to reduce the warriors and aggressors and rape. it is expensive and it has been like this throughout history. when we talk about resistance movements throughout history, we are not talking about the conflict between the armies of countries . the concentration of achievements and resistance were until they brought the enemy to a point and forced

him to accept in all conflicts with the occupiers, fighters and aggressors throughout history and it is the same in our region in gaza. today in this battle. when these pressures increase, be persistent, patient and influential and be present in the field and be the ruling policy. and it should be global presence, national presence and similar. the enemy will be forced to retreat and be defeated, and this will be clear. today netanyahu every day. in the afternoon, he talks to the chiefs of his settlements in the gaza strip. he says something and when who goes to the press conference and says something else. they

say that we are occupying gaza and we will remain there. in the afternoon press conference, he said that we do not want to occupy gaza. they suffered from headaches. it gets worse day by day and changes its words during the hour. the minister of war is like that. this is their happiness, this is their headache. time is not in favor of the enemy. failure in the field, failure to surrender the people of gaza despite all the serious crimes faced by the people of gaza. as we said, the change in the public opinion of the world has been achieved in the attitude of the countries, the military defeat in the field has been achieved. worry about and their expansion, all of these are the factors that put pressure on the zionist enemy, the pressures that exist, they live in hotels, in tents, in tents

, due to internal migration in the regime of three pressures , direct or indirect economic damages to the zionist regime, tens of billions of dollars the damage of all these factors causes that in the end , as well as the pressure of the families of the israeli prisoners who are with the resistance in gaza, all these factors make time and time tighter. these factors must continue . the people of gaza endure resistance and we we also hope for faqsar, where the resistance

will win, and palestine will become a resistance, and this enemy will fail to achieve any of his goals. despite all the injuries and crimes committed so far. today, we ask god to bless us and we are with the martyrs. i ask you to pray, pray, do not take it lightly, pray for victory, to hasten the victory, to shorten the time for your brothers and sisters, yourselves and your friends in gaza, in the west bank and on all the fronts that god bless and exalted. and this is their honesty and sincerity and their patience

brothers and sisters, on martyr's day, you and i make a pledge with our martyrs, with all our cities, believers, benefactors, dear ones, to move in this direction as a resistance, as a nation, as a family, and as a self-sacrifice, to realize their goals. let us protect their goals, transfer their achievements from generation to generation, and reach the final victory. god willing , they pray in al-aqsa mosque, whatever they do and whatever crime they commit. after october

, israel is no longer israel. existential meaning to the meaning of strategy in the historical sense and in the sense of security is the fact that in the coming days, weeks, months and years , we will move steadily in this direction so that we can join the martyrs . you saw and heard in beirut on the occasion of martyr's day, as i was talking to mr. samadi before the speech of the secretary general of hezbollah on the khabar channel, there was an interesting point that seyyed hassan nasrallah himself pointed out, saying that more than keep your eyes on the lectures and

pay attention to the square where the changes are happening later, we will report it. in today's speech of sison nasrallah, it was mentioned for the first time that hezbollah was able to send its reconnaissance drones to various areas deep in the occupied territories and also sent them to haifa. similarly, the whole of hezbollah announced that gradually they are using more advanced tools and equipment to hit the bases, one of them is barkan missiles, which has a semi-twin warhead, these were some of the most important things that seyyed hassan nasrallah mentioned about the operations of hezbollah fighters, ms. shabiri. what interesting point do you have in cyber space now? we saw the headlines of the media today, well, it was full of news, well, in fact, the issue related to palestine, including the same

meeting that was held in riyadh, the joint meeting of the organization of islamic cooperation and the arab league, after the heads of the talks, i saw that the media office of the hamas government published a statement. and he raised his demands from the arab and islamic countries that are now gathered in riyadh. this statement has seven clauses. i will start from the seventh clause, which seems to be the most important clause. it says that we want a joint arab and islamic summit. to expel israel from all palestinian lands to end the occupation and establish the state of palestine with jerusalem as its capital. my point is that the ambassadors of israel should be expelled from different countries of the world and the diplomatic relations should be severed. also , i would like to have a fund to help gaza so

that it can compensate for the heavy attacks that the regime the zionist demanded that a court be established and tried the zionist regime . and fix this issue and one using an interpretation that the blood cascade that is going on as a result of this holo cassette should be stopped and different islamic and arab countries should come to the field to save our great people, these were parts of the statement. if we have time, i will also say other points. we were in the pictures that there is a demonstration in london today.

i saw that one of the reporters of the media affiliated with the british government described this rally as the biggest march of supporters of palestine in the history of london. up to one million people came to the streets in london. yes, and i would also like to point out that among the speeches of mr. seyed hassan nasrallah, one sentence has been highlighted in the cyberspace and users have quoted it in the sense that if you want to enter a regional war, you should not. let's stop the war in gaza. the president of our country spoke in riyadh. mr. raisi gave a speech in which he had a ten-point proposal. mr. raisi is making a lot of noise there in the cyberspace, which

was almost mentioned in the hamas statement. it was from the end of the massacre and lifting of the siege until if in in the short term, this did not happen, in fact

, the countries of the region should provide weapons to palestine so that they can fight. you can see that it belongs to the city. in the past, we have seen that on saturday and sunday, various parts of the world witnessed rallies in support of the palestinian people and the establishment of a ceasefire in gaza. an hour ago

, we also saw pictures of london, where hundreds of thousands of people came to the streets every week, more than the number of participants in this gatherings are increasing. well, now, mr mostafa moslehzadeh, diplomat and former ambassador of iran in jordan, has come to our office, mr. moslehzadeh. hello , welcome. today, we had some serious issues, a special meeting of islamic and arab countries in riyadh. also, seyyed hassan nasrallah's speech on the occasion of martyr's day in lebanon, a collection of content that seyyed hassan nasrallah said , let's put together the heads of islamic and arab countries, what can be analyzed from these

? he was listening to the talks of the leaders and of course seyed . i remembered that the middle east strategically its arrangement is not much different from the middle east after the second world war, because when abdul nasser led the bloc fighting against israel and , naturally, the superpower supporting israel , he had an opposing bloc, not israel itself, and america had an opposing bloc, which abdul nasser said

i look at israel with one eye, tel aviv with one eye, and riyadh with one eye. he said a very interesting point. the back means the door . this is exactly what he wanted to say about the back of the case if i get hit, it means the opposite side, which is still the same. i mean, the strategic arrangement of the opposite side is israel, and the superpower that america has completely protects and expands israel, but this side of the two blocs is exactly repeating itself, only the difference at that time, the leader of the bloc led the struggle against abdul nasser and several other leaders, such as syria, and the other side of the struggle bloc was the compromise block, where in reality his leadership was with saudi arabia. that's why

abdul nasser was very worried about the forces of the compromise block in front of israel. . hit him. now exactly the same triangular arrangement and there is that is, the opposite point is the same israel and the same superpower america and this side of two completely blocs today at the islamic cooperation summit in riyadh. you can see sid's speech on this side. that is, the president of iran there and the seyyid of lebanon have a block there, it is completely clear from the talks, and the other side of the compromise block is you, when you listen to the words of the president of egypt, it seems like a very important event in the world. no, basically, and we don't need to do anything special. i don't know. you must

have listened. saudi arabia also has a serious question during these 35 days, why the heads of islamic countries a meeting should be held 35 days after the crisis. you know that the heads of the european union, if they are not directly in the crisis, but immediately after the crisis, the heads of the european union convened a meeting . this was a point that the president of the country, mr. raisi, also mentioned in his speech. iran was persistent from the beginning and even the fact that this meeting was held is one of the results of iran's continuous follow -up . first , i will tell you about this strategy, then i will deal with it

identifying this current crisis, the strategic arrangement is exactly the same, that is, we can still see that egypt has no concern about opening the door and giving aid to gaza, as if it is coping, even though the strategic goal of america and israel, which is to destroy hamas , is actually in egypt. see the same process here. we want to speak more frankly, before the al-aqsa storm, we saw some arab countries , among which the name of saudi arabia was very prominent , in the process of normalizing relations with israel . formation the palestinian government pointed out. we were checking on the khabar news network and now the jahan program today before the al-aqsa storm. we saw that the most important obstacles in the relationship have nothing to do with the palestinians. the saudis' position

was that they could get certain fighters from the united states. buy or be able to have, for example, nuclear energy facilities in their country, and the palestinian issue was off the agenda, now the compromise trend and the trend that wants to align with the zionist regime and secure its own interests basically hates hamas to fail. in language of course they don't come, but this is the goal of their strategists, that is, egypt and saudi arabia, who definitely want hamas to be destroyed, but if you see this saudi arabia today, you think there is a strategic change with saudi arabia, the war of 206, which wanted the destruction of hezbollah , this is what iran thinks. they are completely wrong. i knew from the beginning that this was not a strategic change in saudi arabia, because at the same time as it is establishing relations with iran

, it is normalizing with israel. this is completely gone. show it shows that the strategy of no change has occurred in saudi arabia and saudi arabia 206, which is quite clear , later on , it was part of sayyed hassan nasrallah's complaints that some arab countries are stabbing resistance yes. i mean, i want to say that saudi arabia today has not made a strategic difference with saudi arabia in 206. this was a mistake that some people in iran thought that a strategic change had occurred , not saudi arabia, the same saudi arabia during the time of abdul nasser, not at all during 206, that is, saudi arabia. it was abdul nasser and the iranians and saudis were in the leadership of the compromise bloc. that's mean pahlavi iran and saudi arabia have changed exactly 180 degrees, the leadership

of the struggle bloc has fallen in iran, that is, there is the principle of resistance and compromise , but some countries have changed their positions , there has been a shift in the actors, that is, the leadership of the struggle bloc is now iran, which is now iran. there is, and egypt, which was the leader of the struggle bloc, now egypt and saudi arabia become the leaders of the compromise bloc, only a change has happened. of course, saudi arabia has not moved. saudi arabia is still in the same bloc. egypt and iran have moved, which means that the leadership of the struggle bloc has completely moved. look at egypt. a point and question on the strategy bar saudi arabia has not changed, despite the fact that some people think that it has changed, i think that now that we are reviewing the positions that we have seen in the last 30 days, the positions of the heads of the countries have been forced under the influence of public opinion. how long can you

remain silent in front of such a crime? now, anyway, saudi arabia also has thoughts. the public is facing itself, that is, many people are talking about rome these days, they say that what can be promising is now the pressure of public opinion. in your opinion, despite this, saudi arabia has not changed yet . strategic transformation does not happen with the pressure of public opinion. a strategic transformation occurs when the system basically undergoes a strategic change , for example, suppose that there is a change in its relationship with israel. let's leave it aside because some people think that it has established a relationship with iran, this is a strategic development, no, this is completely a tactical development, that is, you, the saudis, by the way , are deliberately

promoting the relationship with iran with israel, so that this will create a strategic deception in the event that that normalization process is the strategy process with israel, the relationship with iran is a tactical relationship, where can we understand from the rest of the saudi behavior , we can understand that its behavior with israel has not changed, but its behavior with iran has been in the same period that it has established a relationship. to completely show their own characteristics means to show that it was somehow surprising that saudi arabia, which has been walking towards peace and compromise , suddenly came to the middle of a story and created a dispute over a strategic figure and not an ordinary figure. it showed that the strategic feature

with this strategy, this strategy is the symbol of the iranian general. well, where is this strategic change? it is still the same strategy, that is, the strategic feature with this symbol, the symbol of the fight against israel and america, how about the rest of the countries, or basically , let me give another example . he was even supposed to invite the jordanians, but they did not show up and said, "if the israelis say that we will not come, we will not come. saudi arabia had to remove the israelis because of this . this is a strategic change. it means under the pressure of the government." what is the pressure of the nations, you are forced not to present your strategy for the time being, they don't call it strategic transformation, it means that he says, "well, for now, i am like normalization

, do you think that now normalization with israel has been completely removed from the table of saudi foreign policy, but that is what is hidden." this is an achievement. well, this covertness means tactics, it means that he doesn't dare, well, that means tactics, they don't say this. the strategy of hiding the strategy is a tactic. for now, i will remove the normalization with israel from my table and put it in the drawer. sitting can be positive, i'm not saying this , i'm saying it's negative, i'm saying a tactical change, just a hint. i did it, which means creating it means holding a summit of islamic countries, because its president is saudi arabia, he should do it in the first week, that is, exactly like the european union , which organized the first days of the european summit, why

did n't i hold a summit of islamic countries? it has been established, i want to ask his opinion about the discussion we had here, mr. zari, hello. thank you very much to your excellency and the distinguished guest of the program, mr dear musalzadeh and viewers , i say hello and good night. mr. zari, today we witnessed the extraordinary meeting of arab and islamic countries in riyadh . for the first time, these countries gathered at the level of their leaders around the palestinian issue. the positions that we examine, collection. it has become more frank than in the past weeks, but the question that arises here is what is the point of this frankness , is it real or not at all, and what action should they take in practice? there was an interpretation that the countries under this ceiling