hold a protest. five weeks of demonstrations by hundreds of thousands of people from different groups of british people in protest of the palestinian genocide led to a meeting of parliamentarians with the government with the proposal of the scottish national party to establish a ceasefire in gaza. stephen flynn, leader of the scottish national party, the third largest party. urgent in gaza and has challenged the attitude of the government and the labor party in opposing the ceasefire in gaza. how much worse does the situation have to be for the representatives to agree to the ceasefire request? 4690 children have been killed in gaza, newborn children due to lack of oxygen in party leaders are dead at least when

the government and the leaders of both major parties are against the ceasefire in gaza and the party representatives are obliged to approve their opinion, the result is clear. 39 representatives opposed the request for a ceasefire in gaza and only 125 representatives are in favor of the ceasefire. the councilors present in front of the british parliament building are against the wishes of the majority of the people. we want an immediate truce right now because thousands of innocent people have been killed and genocide has started in palestine . supporters

of palestine in england are protesting in this gathering they said that during the 40-day invasion of gaza, the zionist regime killed more than 15,000 people and injured or disabled about 30,000 people, most of whom are women and children, and the parliamentarians' opposition to the ceasefire means confirmation of the continuation of these crimes. is. mojtaba ghasemzadeh, journalist of sed and radio, london. and after 40 days of killing and killing defenseless people of gaza by the zionist regime, the un security council approved a resolution that only emphasized the humanitarian pause in what is happening in gaza . there is no mention of a ceasefire in this resolution. previously passed a resolution to stop the attacks

the zionist regime of the people of gaza was defeated in the security council by the veto of america, england and france. the adoption of a humanitarian pause resolution and not a complete ceasefire. after 40 days of the zionist regime in gaza and after four unsuccessful resolutions of the security council. a resolution that china and russia consider weak. stronger than this, and of course , it would have passed much earlier than today and would have ended the israeli attacks on civilians in gaza. russia abstained from this resolution because it believes that a complete ceasefire should have been called for. there should have been a picture of a complete ceasefire emphasis was placed. america has always prevented the cessation of attacks on gaza. it is a shame that the security council passed such a weak resolution.

america and england also refused to do so. because this resolution did not condemn the hamas resistance movement. according to this resolution, the attacks of the zionist regime on gaza should be stopped to provide humanitarian aid to the people. opposition to the forced migration of the people of gaza and depriving them of basic services, including water, electricity and fuel, has been emphasized in this security council resolution. in addition, there is an urgent and unconditional request for the prisoners of the zionist regime. agent in this meeting, the palestinian observer criticized the security council's inattention and learning to establish a ceasefire in gaza in the past 40 days and emphasized: this resolution should not remain only on paper. bloodshed, death and destruction continue in gaza and nothing is safe from israeli attacks. no children, no women, no hospitals. neither the

un shelters, nor even the employees of this organization, the security council , should act much sooner to establish a ceasefire. the united nations relief and works agency announced that it has sheltered nearly 800,000 displaced people in gaza in about 15 overcrowded and overcrowded centers. the number of un employees killed in gaza by the zionist army has reached 12, and now nearly 30 other un employees are injured, ali rajabi , united nations broadcaster, new york. now we are at the service of mr. nasser nobari, a former diplomat and an expert in international issues. mr. nobari, hello, welcome to the world today. hello, i am also at your service . greetings to my dear viewers and apologies for

the delay in my arrival, apparently the reason was traffic and problems in the city of tehran. anyway, thank you for visiting me a few months ago in today's world we were at your service then. the war in gaza had not happened and we were talking about the transition of the world from the previous point of view, it seems new to me, the topic of your conversation was now the war of qadha happened on october 7 , it seems to some extent that the equations have changed again, the war in gaza is in line with the same change. in the new opinion, you know, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, yes, that we talked about the transitional period in the previous program and said that we are moving from a unipolar system to a multipolar one, and we even said that the transitional period is a sensitive and dangerous period that is interesting to prevent the occurrence of wars. from that program to this program, another third war

it happened because until that program, only two wars had happened, one was the ukraine war, one was the south caucasus war, and now a third war has been added. it will be completed. now this event has actually completed. the transition period is now a dangerous period . why is it a dangerous period because a stable system that has existed in the world, for example, in the unipolar model or the bipolar model or any model, when there is a stable system, when if he wants to change from this system to another system, in fact, that system will lose its stability, it will become unstable, or as i called it , it will become fluid, the global structure, i called it.

the world structure becomes fluid during the transition period, which means it comes out of rigidity. see, the best example is what is happening now. some people are making a mistake . some analysts say that war in this era is no longer effective. if a war is waged, it will be ineffective , while this is not true. in the era of global rigid structure, yes, it may not work, like the iran-iraq war, which ended without results , in fact, but the war in the transition period happens to work . why did i say that the global rigidity was lost? the global rigid structure was lost. the world system when the world system becomes unstable look, the best happens more easily. yes , that is, consider a rigid body . the rigid global structure cannot be changed easily, but when the global structure weakens and becomes fluid, it can be changed more easily. therefore, those who say that war is useless in the recent era and

does not work, are wrong. in the transition period , by the way, war works. look, the best example is the toad war, the toad war. the transition between bipolarity and unipolarity happened when the soviet union collapsed, the first war, the first war of qorbagh happened , this time the armenians took the territory of azerbaijan and to be successful, to take advantage of the opportunity because the stiffness was gone, the world was not yet formed . the result is that you can't get land in a stable world, yes, but in the world you can actually see that it is happening, it is going to land. now , what is more interesting is that this green zone happened for 30 years . after 30 years, that is, in 30 years, nothing

happened in the world. a strong monopole, but the world that has fallen now is in transition again after 30 years you see, this time the other side will attack you, fight with war, take land, yes, and it took land again , that is, azerbaijan took back its land this time, that is , you can see that a territorial war will take place in the era of these and those. this point that i said, now the war of akran is the next example, the war of akran has finally created a territorial development , before that crimea was completely conquered, while in a stable world, now a polar, bipolar , tri-polar, even if it is a polar but stable world, it is possible that this the equations can be changed so easily territorial development will be created, it is not possible to see that it will become clear to you in the world transition a century ago from the european concert model of the five

powers to the bipolar model that became the soviet union and the united states . it took about 30 years for the european concert model to become two. qtubi 30 years long, what happened in these 30 years, there were two big world wars , because the original structure was broken , the original global structure was broken, and countries start to compete when the structure is completely broken. the country that is competing more is developing and gaining influence it is coming less and less, by the way, its possibilities are becoming less and less, but i think this was the reason why in world war i and ii, the world powers changed and changed, and this challenge continued until a bipolar world was achieved and stability was established . in other words, the world in transition is a dangerous world, both a threat and an opportunity for

those countries that are alert , they will take advantage of the opportunity to develop and penetrate, they will threaten those countries that are negligent, they are not prepared, and in fact, they will lose their positions and be limited. they find limitations. now here is a small example for you let me make it clear that this is what happened to us in the caucasus. well, you can see that there are trends in the development of the population to take advantage of the opportunity to develop the population. we actually infiltrated and gave permission. this shows exactly the equation , that is, we just realized that there is a contradiction in this environment, and then we warned that we are not ready for international borders to change . something has happened. your microphone is falling. yes , let's see a picture, we will come back

, i will continue the conversation with mr. nobari, mr. nobari well, this is one of the conditions that existed before the gaza war, the world was ready for new developments to take place, and on october 7, yes, now you see, one of the very clear and good examples for the transitional period is the gaza war. this model of the gaza war is exceptional. it has been 70 years now. they used to fight each other regularly , we had all kinds of wars between palestinians, israelis, arabs, and all these kinds of wars, but a model that happened this time, the whole world says it is exceptional, how could this model happen, this must have happened in a stable world system. it was not impossible, that is , 10 years ago it could not have been impossible, this is our model of war

we had a lot of gaza, i don't know any more wars, 10 days, 15 days, 20 days, none of this model, so this is one of the characteristics of the world in transition, now i will tell you an interesting thing that, well, in the world in transition, it has happened now. and this same war, the war of the case, the difference between the current era and the era of a century ago, when two world wars happened, has one very interesting thing, an interesting feature , and that, and that, and that system, the system of strategic balance, a nuclear one, that is. during our period , we didn't have balance and nuclear weapons, we didn't have atomic bomb today in the current world of atomic bombs and nuclear bombs, we can discover how at that time the smallest difference would lead to a world war, but now

, even though there are severe differences , it will lead to a war on the international stage, but it has not yet led to a world war. what is the reason for the war being limited? the reason is that if the war in this period, for example, the ukraine war, if this war wanted to develop like a world war and become a world war, it would become an atomic war, and this atomic war means the global atomic balance of nuclear weapons. it causes limited political units to operate, which means they do not develop their operations too much because the americans and nato don't want the same thing that happened in eastern europe. directly to the war with russia is a shame. this feature was not being implemented in the world a century ago, that is why it is easy to go to the end of the war and go ahead to a world war with several tens of millions of people killed, but now all the units feel the danger if

going a little further will cause a nuclear war, a nuclear war also means the destruction that the earth will be destroyed all at the same time, that's why due to the nuclear balance , the nuclear strategic balance of the wars will be limited in this transition period, now look at the war in gaza. everyone has they say that we should keep it limited so that it does not develop. look, this formula of this model was not present in the periodical wars of a century ago. for example , hitler came to this conclusion . it was not a problem for moscow. pay attention, but now the whole world agrees that this the gaza war should remain limited. well, now let's go to the gaza war itself. look at the gaza war. i say that this gaza war is different from exceptional wars. we can start from here . if you remember, maybe you heard mr. biden a lot 30 years ago as a the american strategist famously said that if israel did not exist, we would

we should have built an israel for our own interests, we built america, so if it was israel , we should have built israel for our own interests. well , let's analyze the global conditions at that time , what were the global formulas and global factors that mr. biden, the strategist, is facing. the formula says that america needs an israel, if it doesn't exist, we have to build it, so we want such a base in west asia. yes, my question now is , was today after 30 years a unipolar world? the soviet union is this sentence rou said, now my question is this, after 30 years of today's world change, with different demands of the world change today, do the same factors still exist for america, which he said at that time, based on those factors, we should not have built israel, do the same factors still continue

they exist, this question must be answered, but the approach of the americans with this unconditional and... absolute support they are showing for israel seems to have the same idea, well, this completes the discussion. this question completes the discussion. first of all, those factors don't exist, why that world, i just said, that world is unique qutbbi taslab was firmly established. america, the middle east was actually the energy center of the world, and america had to manage the energy center in order to manage the world. it was dependent on this energy , so a giant like china had not yet emerged, powers like china. the fact that they did not appear in the world to challenge america's unipolar trend was correct, and even russia and russia had collapsed, which means that these two powers, which are now the two major powers in front of america ,

did not exist at that time with today's specifications and standards. not being a model means you have it now america's need for the zionist regime is less than its need for this regime in the past 30 years, and because of that, america's need to pay attention to its competitors, which were not there then, has increased . everyone is saying that america wants to withdraw from the middle east . what does this withdrawal mean? this is the change of the world, that is, the world that needed this to manage that world. america was present in khas, but things have changed and this time america is looking to get out of the middle east. the power of the power that goes to another area should be directed to china and other powers that are emerging. well, you have reached a

good point. it is because its main global competitor is china. but for a few years, america has been involved in ukraine and russia, and now it is possible that these conditions will pass and reach the main rival of china, but the issue of the zionist regime and its crisis has come up. that is, the american who wanted to confront china would not become a superpower in bad times. now, in eastern europe and in the west, asia is turning to this foreign policy of a superpower that is losing its previous order . how will it proceed? fortunately, you made the point very clear. you said exactly what you are saying, america means what has happened now is not in line with america's global strategy . now that america has brought a ship and is stationed there

, it is not a strategic operation and one with a strategic goal. get it and this situation is imposed. now, to see how it is imposed, pay attention when biden came to tel aviv airport two or three days after the war. netanyahu came to welcome him. what is more important is that you have come to israel now , biden. what does this mean? see, biden had been coming to work for netanyahu for 3 years. let him tell tel aviv and mr. netanyahu

kurd said that it is more important than the fact that america is on israel's side, that you are here now, for 3 years you did not let me into the white house, now you yourself have come to israel, you have come to the land of israel, what does this mean that later you will be very happy then zionist media if you were watching, you will see that everyone was happy that america had to abandon its policy of leaving the middle east and return to the middle east. well, now my question is that the israelis who are happy that america changed its strategy means that they are now happy that you said america with this power who came and stood behind israel, so that means he has changed his strategy , he who wanted to leave the middle east, well, the israelis are also very happy . now, what is the answer to this question? the answer to this question is, are the factors of the strategy that forced the world to withdraw from the middle east, those factors of change? to do? are those factors based on

middle east war equations or are those factors related to the global system and global competition of america with china and russia. these competitions have their place , it turns out that what has happened to america now is an emergency situation was. and therefore, first of all, they must be firmly on the ground that it doesn't develop , they are firmly on the bottom so that they don't get stuck, they are directly involved in its ending early, and they are definitely looking for it to end as soon as possible and collect it as soon as possible, because you will see that those global needs continue in in any case, china is happy that america is stuck here more, russia is happy that america is stuck here, well, on the contrary, america is looking to get rid of itself as soon as possible, so the happiness of israel is false. i want to say that israel

is happy. you didn't allow it, now you have to come, you brought my ships, but what happened is not a strategic necessity for america, which has taken this action, it cannot change its strategy, because the world that has not changed, the world is in transition, the world in transition still has those global needs for america and now this is a problem that should be solved now. why is it so powerful? why is it so powerful ? if america wanted to leave, well, if america had given a damn, clarail would have been lost, how could this happen in gaza ? that is, the gaza war happened itself israelis say that this war is the restoration of israel, which means the second war of independence. netanyahu himself is saying why? because what happened in the operation that hamas did. it

shook the whole fundamental principle of israel. what is the reason for israel that we are a safe area here? we made this safe zone. jews of the world come , this is the best place to settle. ok. that idea was wasted, that's why i don't say that it's not my opinion that the foundation of israel has actually been shaken by this action. 70 years ago, only israel was important to them, you see , now in israel, their people are looking to buy my weapons , they are at all worried that i want to kill them at night. deal with us , see for the jews, for those who have their homes and lives in europe, america, and other places , they finally have tidy houses.

the price of coming to a better place, now being in a situation where they sleep with worry every moment of the night , many are looking to buy guns now, i don't remember the statistics, i think it was about 600 or 700 thousand israeli families buying guns. let them defend themselves, look now, in order for these israelis to be safe, they will be forced to move away from the borders. shouldn't they be forced to move away from the border with lebanon to avoid rockets? the remote areas of israel are now doing this as an emergency, but those people who can't live after this tragedy is over, after the crisis is over, they will go if they can, they will go as soon as they are going , and you will see. the israeli foundation has been shaken by this operation of hamas, unfortunately, in the opportunity

we are at the end. we have less than 3 minutes. how do you think these developments will proceed ? yes, let's see. now, please ask a 30-minute question , not a 3-minute question. now, god willing, the one we had the favor of in the next programs of the world today is a very important question, but before i to answer your question , i will try to answer as quickly as possible because it is important to see the future, see now for the future. americans and europeans are all trying to say that we should form a government model, something that has been discussed for decades, but the israelis have never accepted it. why don't they accept it? we put these little palestinians there , we besieged them, we can't, they will come between us at any moment , now if we give them government and everything , what will happen, that is, the israelis

will see it as a contradiction of their own existence. the state model, well, abraham's peace model, which you have seen now, does not work, that is, israel can be friends with saudi arabia, but it will explode there, so that will not work either, but the americans need stability here, because of the transitioning world, so that they do not get stuck again, and do not have to say again. why did you ask with so much power now to get on the subject? look, the person who wanted to ride the crisis should come first to the crisis, you understand, that means he should take everything, he should take everything, so that he can ride, so that he can manage. now the question is , the gentlemen in the world are making prescriptions, saying that we are a mother of the right government. let's make two governments, one government, one jewish government, one islamic government. well, where are they giving this theory? they are the same ones who in the west and in america say that governments should be secular. what about those who say that governments should be secular

? a government is a government, see exactly contrary to the idea of ​​the westerners, while the best model to solve this crisis is a secular government, i think the debate is really becoming a martyr . tomorrow night, i can invite you to continue the conversation tomorrow night, and it's not a pity, because we were using it, tonight, there was not enough time , i will talk more in detail tomorrow, omid god, thank you very much , i will say goodbye to the viewers of khabar network. tomorrow night , we will continue this conversation with dr. nobari good.

with the announcement at 3:00 am, i present the news of this news section to you. the ryan national games foundation announced that the average iranian mobile players play for 93 minutes a day, according to the report of the national computer games foundation on the use of mobile games from 2014 to 1400. it has increased by 88 per year. this report shows that the share of mobile players increased by 4% compared to the previous survey and reached 96 players in the country.