i thank mr. kathirnejad for appearing in today's world . the us threat to veto the gaza resolution prevented the vote. became the united nations security council. according to published news, the draft resolution of some arab countries about gaza was not put up for voting and the members of the security council are still deliberating. america insists on adding quick condemnation of hamas in the resolution and has set it as a precondition of not voting against the draft. you, who oppose the war in

new york , condemned the crimes of the zionist regime in gaza and america's support for this regime. the victims of the end of the zionist occupation betrothed in paris , people held a rally in support of the palestinian people. continue to stand in solidarity with the palestinians. the capital of jordan was once again the scene of the gathering of supporters of palestine. demonstrating their disgust with the crimes of the zionist regime, the demonstrators asked the jordanian government to export some of in america, a student

was expelled because his mother had published content in cyberspace in support of palestine. this expulsion is the latest example of double standards for human rights. amsar i am disappointed and sad. judd expelled from school. it was a few months before he graduated from high school after his mother published a picture of the killing of palestinian children on the internet, he was told that he could no longer come to school. his mother, who was a teacher, was also fired. the school has published a statement. the content published by motherraj may endanger the safety of students, employees and their families and increase violence in society.

death, destruction or hatred. the spokesman of the white house criticized this congressman for speaking about the freedom of palestine. when it comes to the phrase , it is divisive, it is hurtful , many consider it harmful, and many consider it harmful. considered anti-semitic. in addition to the possibility of the expulsion of the representative of the american congress, students who support the palestinian people in this country are also facing the risk of expulsion and suspension. in november, when we had a peaceful march , we were attacked by the opponents of this march, and finally, the disbelievers were given suspension letters. . this. it has been a year since

the united states called the riots in the streets of iran a protest for the pursuit of justice and said that it stood by the women of iran. today, we stand by the brave citizens and women of iran who are protesting to achieve their basic rights. the united states has joined countries around the world to support the iranian people in pursuing justice, accountability, and respect for their human rights. since the beginning of the zionist attacks, more than 19,000 people have been martyred in gaza, most of them women and children . america, however , vetoed the security council resolution on stopping the war in gaza: we stand by israel, you may be strong enough to defend but as long as america exists you will never have to. we are always with you and now. in the second case

, the american double standards in the field of law we will pay. in this regard , we are hosting mr. toheed asadi, an expert on american issues. mr. esadi, hello, welcome in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful, my greetings, courtesy and respect , we are at your service and your dear viewers . we have seen the report prepared by my colleagues regarding these double standards, what is your opinion and analysis? you see, the first point is that we are not facing double standards in the united states . the standards are based on the fact that america's interests are secured, these american behaviors. is actually dual and actually a kind of perception the public call to prayer creates that the standards are double. what we are witnessing in the united states is that the behavior of the americans , compared to their explanatory policies and the words

they say, is not only incompatible, but in a sense , it is in contradiction with the words that are said and the actions that are taken and this contradiction about. the issue of the zionist regime became much more obvious. we can mention many different examples. among other things, we in the united states are witnessing that the resistance of the palestinians against the occupation and conquest of the zionist regime is opposed, but with the same the category of occupation and conquest by the israelis is happening, they agree, they support and claim to play the role of peace. they are happening in public gatherings, despite this claim, we have seen that many times the resolutions and proposals for a ceasefire in the gaza strip were rejected with the direct veto of

the united states. it has been mentioned, including the package of more than 100 billion dollars of aid that was supposed to be given to ukraine and the zionist regime. while the americans stopped any humanitarian and civilian aid to the people of gaza in the field of the media, please note that not only in the last 74 days, a significant number of media members were killed, but before that , an al jazeera reporter was killed by a terrorist of the zionist regime, yes, and other journalists who were killed by the forces of the zionist regime. in contrast to the false claim that america supports the media in relation to media freedom , america is silent and tries not to actually support the media, and

the most interesting thing is that there is actually a double view. which we are observing in the discussion of corrections, see the states muttahida claims that it is looking for a reduction. there are nuclear weapons, and on the one hand, this claim is made, on the other hand, the zionist regime has nuclear warheads, and under the burden of no control , and in fact , no understanding to reduce its nuclear power, we can see from this picture. and this shows that these reforms are in the hands of a regime that does not recognize any boundaries for violence and war-mongering, and on the other side, we have the united states and many of its allied countries in europe, who prefer this. the subject at a glance

follow the differences based on the interests of the work . thank you. this discussion of standards or behaviors that you mentioned also existed regarding the war in ukraine. then, regarding the gaza war , we put these positions together to see and then we will continue our conversation. forces are doing in ukraine and think that any ethical, moral individual could justify that. it's difficult to look at the sorry, it's

difficult to look at some of the images and imagine that any well-thinking. serious mature leader would do that, so i can't speak to his psychology, but uh, i think we can all speak to his depravity. this is war, it is combat, it is bloody, it is ugly, and it's going to be messy, and innocent civilians are going to be hurt going forward. i wish i could tell you something different. i wish that that wasn't going to happen, but it is, it is going to happen. we will continue the conversation. we saw the positions of john kirby. for one issue, the lives of civilians. when the war between ukraine and russia it comes, we see a position. even. this person hates now, true or false, but when

the same lives, the same people, the same humanity are killed by the zionists in the gaza war, he says that every war has a civilian casualty anyway, and he simply rejects this approach. where does this reaction towards a single soul that is common among humans originate in the americans? you see , i will get into this topic, but before that, i remembered something that might be interesting to mention related to this topic . the country became, of course, a significant number of civilians were killed there by american soldiers, and the term is actually used in american literature. it could have been collateral casualties, that is, you where exactly you

are, that is, when you shoot people and you realize later, or perhaps you already realized that they are civilians , we refer to it as collateral, and this shows that to what extent do the americans, or at least the people who work in the pentagon, look at the category? human life can be contradictory. i will go back to the sentence that i gave you in the previous question i did. contradiction is one of the natures of behavior and indeed political statements, especially in the field of american foreign policy. in the field of ukraine , see some obvious contradictions. i browse quickly. i hope i can answer part of this question. the first point is that we have two specific scenarios. one is the war in ukraine and the other is the war that is happening in palestine, and again

, citing their own literature, the americans consider russia to be the occupier in the story of ukraine, and the aggressor and the aggressor are accepted in the same literature that the zionist regime invaded the palestinian lands. attacked and in a way, in fact, the word occupation is used there as well, but in the case of ukraine, we are actually on the side of the side that is occupied, and on the other side , we are on the side of the side that is actually invading and occupying , and this shows that the main problem is the same, but there are two solutions and two different views. well, this first seems to the resident that the basis of the conflict between the warring parties is not the basis of the conflict of interests. there is one that the united states can have in any war , and if there is an opportunity later

, i will talk more about this issue. the second point means the same word that at the beginning of the conversation, you mentioned that the standard is the same, the standard is the same, yes , it is the national interest, and following the same standard, behaviors are actually redefined . i have nothing to do with it, but it is strange that this country itself has an interesting record of attacking and invading other countries in the last 10-15 years without the green light of the ruling governments . we saw it, and if we go back later, we will open it there has been a long list of us aggressions against different countries. in the name of war , in the name of military intervention, in the name of a coup or any other name you want to use, this has always

been a part of the american foreign policy, this intervention and aggression, and now they are taking a contradictory action against this move of russia. i do not take sides, but the principle of this is that you, as a country that was constantly encroaching on the territory of different countries , were constantly intervening. you come and talk about the aggression of another country, so it is somewhat contradictory. the third point that comes to my mind is discussion there is the entry of weapons. well, see in the subject. ukraine, the united states not only supported the entry of all kinds of weapons to ukraine and the military aid that was provided to this country, it actually tried to do this itself to create the ground for other countries, but in other conflicts, even the possibility of access to defense equipment, even in some

cases, the possibility of access to humanitarian cases, even in some cases, the possibility of hands. look at the food and the basic issues that are not allowed for life, see what happened in yemen, iraq, afghanistan, and this american if i have a chance, i will add my last point, if i have a chance, the issue of the media is interesting. see, in the discussion of russia , they produce a series of western media and in the united states, and this is according to the nature of the matter. the relationship between russia and the west is not unusual , it can be accepted to some extent, but when you claim media freedom, and at the same time , we are going to attack all the russian media, sputnik

, and all these networks, you are going to access their networks in any possible way. we have freedom of the media, but if i want to add one more thing, outside the context of the war in ukraine and the aggression of the zionist regime to gaza and the palestinian territories, the double behavior of the united states of america is wider, you see, for example, in the field of china

, the united states has constantly criticized human rights issues in the past years and criticized the beijing government , while you another coin, if you look inside the united states, for example, there is a site , friends, if you have a chance, mapping police violence, which actually publishes the statistics of police violence inside the united states. i was looking at it just a few minutes ago before the conversation started. killed in clashes that the police actually acted and people have been killed by shooting or by violent actions, and it is interesting. yes , since 2023, that is, in 2023, more than 100 people have been killed by the police on the streets of america and in cities . if you are black , you are three times more likely to be killed by the police in a conflict, which means that

there is racial assault and discrimination and a series of these events in the united states. yes, but when these debates are raised abroad, we always have the claim that we have to defend ourselves, and again , the basis here is human rights, not legal basis. it is definitely based on politics and in economic cases , look at resistance groups, in cases where they are defending the independence of countries, they are easily labeled terrorism by the united states for this. groups are mentioned, but on the one hand , i emphasize the official reports of the american media, that is, the reports published by the americans themselves show that we had direct support for terrorist groups such as isis. it was exposed and he showed these and other different groups that

i think you are the group of hypocrites. the performance characteristic is quite precise. the terrorists of this group are the works of shamseh, and the interesting thing about the hypocrites is that the reason they were included in the american terror list was that these terrorists had assassinated some of the americans themselves , however, the americans removed them from the list a few years later, such as finally , if we want to examine the behavior of the united states , whether it is towards ukraine or the issue. the duality of behavior based on the interests that may be created for this country in these wars is the main thing that should be taken into consideration. thank you. i want to see how much it is. the last thing that harvard

researched through the harris institute was that 52% of american youth support the solution to the palestinian- israeli problem, not the two-state solution that the americans propose, but the one-state solution that the palestinian government proposes. religion is good, they know that 52% of the new generation of america think like this, what happened that this public opinion is so different from the official policies of the government? well, if you are not upset, i will say that it is not surprising. it is among the younger generation, not only in the united states rather, we see it all over the world, so take a look . get out of america. in the past few weeks, we

have seen massive demonstrations in various european countries whose governments strongly support the zionist regime. young people finally came to support palestine, and this shows that the government's approach is actually a reflection. the correctness of the collective will and the will of public opinion in different european countries is not a point. the second point is that in the united states. basically, not only in the issue of the zionist regime, but in general, trust in the government has decreased drastically in the past years. poll now the surveys that have been done are different. i prefer to refer to the survey conducted by the pio center , which shows that in the past years, the trust in the us government itself has fallen below 20%, and this is a gap and a dichotomy. it shows seriousness in the political arena of the united states, but let's go back to the issue of the zionist regime. well, look at cutting off the internet from all media tools, using

official officials. i do n't know. those 18, 19, 20,000 people who were killed in palestine are these people literature is actually all these discourse creation and efforts . as for the young generation in the united states, which is interesting, they used to call this generation the vator generation, that is, a generation that is politically very interested in the ups and downs, at least as much as a country like iran. now, they are mainly concerned with what is happening in politics there is no need for you to see what borders violence, conflict and injustice have crossed, that the generation that in the united states once did not pay much attention to politics, as they say, they do not care about it now , and in one of the issues of foreign policy, now this point

let me add in parentheses that foreign policy is an issue that americans do not have a direct, meaningful relationship with domestic politics , that is, economic, insurance, and health issues are their first concern, but it is a political issue. foreigners have become such a reality that yes, among your young generation, you can see this look . thank you, mr. setaf kurdin , for appearing in the world today .

do you know how to buy in installments? pay attention , if the consumer price of a product or a basket of products is, for example, 20 million tomans, and it is supposed to be 20 let's pay the percentage in advance, this 20% should be deducted from the consumer price, so

our debt will be 16 million tomans. fees and fees must be calculated based on this amount , so be careful about the consumer price and the remaining cash .

hello, have a good evening, dear viewers of the premier football league, esteghlal sepahan won the goal and stopped the police press in ahvaz. on the last day of the 13th week of the premier football league, esteghlal defeated mazandaran with four goals in azadi, bringing joy to the stands. armin sohrabian minute 43 for esteghlal in the goal of amir mahdi jan maleki own goal minute 62 kick.