tv [untitled] December 20, 2023 2:30am-3:01am IRST
2:30 am
israelis are like the sea, they only give up dead bodies. this view is shared by many palestinians living in the west bank. zionist crimes did not start from october 7. this is related to 75 years of genocide and ethnic cleansing of palestinians by israel. prisoners are treated with violence and brutality every day. a more effective action should be taken to free them. hamas held a demonstration in front of the mosque, nazarji's result shows that this movement is flourishing under the influence of the gaza war and the fate of the palestinian prisoners. since the october 7 incident, support for hamas has increased is. if elections are held today in the west bank, hamas will win more than 40% of the votes. still with
2:31 am
the world is with you today, mr. kathirnejad, we have seen this report and the popularity of hamas is still higher even in the west bank than in 2006 when the elections were held in palestine, hamas was the choice of the palestinian people, it seems that even this war could not reduce the popularity of hamas and even increased it. well, this is the goal of the zionists to destroy hamas, but anyway they are carrying out their war. recently, lieberman told former officials that the war is a tool for netanyahu. the continuation of his political life has become still since the beginning of the 7th of october , if we compare the past, the zionists could not achieve anything. they can't get rich and time is not in their favor, now
2:32 am
ask them to get out of the war situation , they have not achieved anything, but the costs of the war are putting pressure on them in all fields, public opinion, the international scene inside the occupied territories, the differences between them are increasing, the continuation of the war and the future. with attention how does the community analyze this situation? yes , the situation may be said to be the most difficult for netanyahu, that is, many of netanyahu's rivals.
2:33 am
continue this war until it achieves an achievement, and we have not seen any achievements in the past few years. how long will this path continue, because the situation was exactly the same 2 weeks ago or 3 weeks ago? one is that the pressure from israel's allies will force it to reach a long-term ceasefire . we are at a point where we want to decide independently of the united states. we know exactly why, for example , the heavy burden that ansarullah's activities in yemen have placed on the western economy has pushed them to go and talk to the israelis to end the war sooner. that the meeting that happened in poland between the heads of 3 mossad and the prime minister of qatar after this pressure. a
2:34 am
truce happened again. this is one of the scenarios. the next point is that there are a series of laws inside the occupied territories that can cause the destruction of this coalition and the destruction of it. absenteeism means netanyahu's departure and elections , and naturally, if elections are held , netanyahu is not the one who wants to form a government, and gans is probably the one who can do it. until another party wastes money and forms a new government, and then the situation will be completely different, and in fact, a point that arises is a quote from lapit yari lapit made a strange comment yesterday and announced that israel should go to the two-state solution can no longer eliminate palestine , and we have to counter netanyahu and the ruling group's slogans that they were giving until a week ago.
2:35 am
it is suggested that we should recognize palestine and there is no longer talk of eliminating hamas. i thank mr. kathirnejad for appearing in today's world . america's threat to veto the gaza resolution prevented a vote in the un security council. according to the published news, the draft resolution of some arab countries about gaza was not put up for voting, and the members of the security council are still deliberating on adding the quick condemnation of hamas to the resolution . he insists and
2:36 am
has set it as a precondition of not voting against the draft. a number of opponents of the war in new york, the crimes of the zionist regime in gaza and those who condemned america's support for this regime demanded the end of the zionist occupation. in paris, people declared solidarity with the palestinians by holding a rally in support of the palestinian people . the capital of jordan was once again the scene of the gathering of supporters of palestine . the demonstrators expressed their disgust with the crimes
2:37 am
of the zionist regime and asked the jordanian government to stop the export of some items to the occupied territories. in america, a student was expelled because his mother had published content in cyberspace in support of palestine. this dismissal is the latest example of double standards for rights it is considered human. spouse. i am disappointed and sad. judd has been expelled from school. he was a few months away from graduating from high school. after his mother took a picture of palestinian children posted on social media that he was told that he could no longer come to school. his mother, who was a teacher, was also fired. the school has published a statement. the content published by motherraj may
2:38 am
endanger the safety of students, employees and their families and increase violence in society. none of my posts were violent. the us congress also meets a few weeks before. for one of the formed representatives. they accused him of anti-semitism because he said that palestine should be freed. all. from the river to the sea, the desire is for freedom, human rights and peaceful coexistence, not death, destruction or hatred. the spokesman of the white house criticized this congressman for speaking about the freedom of palestine. when it comes to the phrase "stream to stream", it 's divisive, it's hurtful. in addition to the possibility of the expulsion of the representative of the american congress, the students who support the palestinian people in this country are also facing the risk of expulsion and suspension in november, when we had a peaceful march by the opponents of this march
2:39 am
we were attacked and finally the disbelievers were given suspension letters . it was just last year that the united states protested riots and disturbances in the streets of iran to pursue justice. and he said, standing by the women of iran, today we are standing by the brave citizens and women of iran who are protesting to achieve their basic rights. the united states has joined countries around the world to support the iranian people in pursuing justice, accountability, and respect for their human rights. since the beginning of the zionist attacks, more than 19,000 people have been martyred in gaza. most of them are women are children america, however , vetoed the security council resolution on stopping the war in gaza. we stand by israel. you may be strong enough to defend yourself. but as long as america exists you will never have to
2:40 am
. we are always by your side. and now in the second case to the american double standards in the field of law. in this regard , we are hosting mr. toheed asadi, an expert on american issues. mr. asadi, hello , welcome, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. i am at your service, you and your dear viewers. are. we saw the report prepared by my colleagues regarding these double standards. what is your opinion and analysis? look, the first point is that we don't have double standards in the united states. the standards are one-of-a-kind and based on the fact of securing america's interests. it is america's behavior that is actually double and actually creates a perception in the public mind that the governor. it is twofold. what we see in the united states is that the behavior
2:41 am
of the americans is not only inconsistent compared to the policies they follow and the words they say. in a sense, there is a contradiction and contradiction with the words that are said and the actions that are taken, and this contradiction became much more obvious in the case of the zionist regime . we can find many different examples. let's mention, among other things, that we in the united states are witnessing that the resistance of the palestinians against the occupation and conquest of the zionist regime is opposed, but with the same category of occupation and conquest by the israelis , they agree, support and claim to play a role in peacemaking. they are happening in public gatherings, despite this claim, we witnessed several murders. proposals for a ceasefire in the gaza strip it was rejected with the direct veto of the united states, the provision of aid
2:42 am
to the zionist regime that has been proposed by the americans recently, including the aid package of more than 100 billion dollars, which was supposed to go to ukraine and the zionist regime, while the americans blocked it. any humanitarian and civilian aid to the people of gaza. in the media watch , please note that not only in the last 74 days , a significant number of media members were killed , but before that, an al-jazeera reporter was killed by a thug by the thugs of the zionist regime, yes, and other journalists who were killed by the forces. the zionist regime will be killed, and america's view of this issue, contrary to the false claim that it supports the media in relation to the freedom of the media, is that
2:43 am
it chooses to remain silent and tries not to actually support the media at all. in fact, there is a double view that we are witnessing in the arms issue. you see, the united states claims that it is seeking to reduce nuclear weapons, and on the one hand, this claim is made. the wing does not recognize violence and warmongering, and on the other side, we
2:44 am
have the united states and many of its allied countries in europe, who prefer regarding this issue , follow the work with an indifferent look based on the interests. thank you. this discussion of standards or behaviors that you mentioned also existed regarding the war in ukraine . let's see and then we will continue our conversation. ethical, moral individual could justify that, it's difficult to look at the sorry, it's
2:45 am
2:46 am
when the same lives, the same people, the same humanity are killed in the gaza war by the zionists, he says that anyway every war has a civilian casualty and it's simple. and it is normal to reject this issue, this approach, this reaction to a single soul that is common between humans, where does it take root in the americans ? it may be interesting to mention related to this topic that during the war in afghanistan, when the united states entered this country with the claim of fighting terrorism, of course the number it is noteworthy that a civilian was killed by american soldiers there, and the term that was actually used in the literature of the americans
2:47 am
was collateral damage, that is, you, where yes, yes, exactly, you , that is, when you shoot people and find out later, or maybe probably from before you realized that they are civilians , you mentioned it with a side word, and this shows that the view of the americans, or at least the people who work in the pentagon , can be contradictory to the category of human life. i told you in the previous question. contradiction is one of the nature of behaviors and in fact political statements are especially in the field of american foreign policy. in the field of ukraine
2:48 am
, see how many obvious contradictions there are. ukraine and one war that is happening in palestine and again with. referring to the literature of the americans themselves, in the story of ukraine , russia is considered to be the occupier and the aggressor. in the same literature, it is accepted that the zionist regime attacked the palestinian lands, and in a way, the word "occupation" is used there as well. it is used, but in a case where ukraine is on our side , it is actually the side that was conquered. on the other hand, we are on the side of the faction that actually invades and conquers , and this shows that the main issue is the same , but from two different points of view. the basis for dealing with the warring parties
2:49 am
is not the basis for dealing with the interests that the united states can have in any war , and if there is a chance later, more about this. i am talking about the topic. the second point is the same thing that you said at the beginning of the conversation. it is a single standard the standard is the same, yes, it is the national interest, and following the same standard, behaviors are actually redefined . the second point is that it is strange that the united states criticizes russia for military attack or any word that is used in american literature. i have nothing to do with it, but it is strange that this country itself is only 10-15 years old. the past has an interesting history of attacking and invading other countries without the green light of the ruling governments, the issue of afghanistan, the issue of iraq , the issue of yemen and other cases that we have seen in various countries of west asia, and if we go back, there is a long list of aggressions by the united states to different countries have existed in the name of war, in the name of
2:50 am
military intervention, in the name of coup or any other name you want. in fact , this interference and aggression has always been a part of the american foreign policy, and now they are taking a contradictory action against this move of russia. you have been in different countries , you are always interfering and you talk about the aggression of another country, so it is somewhat inconsistent. the third thing that comes to my mind is the issue of the import of weapons, well, look at the issue of ukraine the united states not only supported the entry of all kinds of weapons to ukraine and the military aid that was provided to this country, it actually tried to do this itself to create the ground for other countries, but in other conflicts, even
2:51 am
the possibility of accessing equipment. defense, even in some cases the possibility of access to humanitarian matters, even in some cases the possibility of access to food and in fact the basic issues that exist for life. look at what happened in yemen, iraq, and afghanistan, and these americans are the key players there. my last point, if you have the chance. i would like to add that here again, the issue of the media is interesting. you see, in the discussion of russia, a group of western media, and in the united states , are producing anti-russian propaganda 247 days a week, and that's it. paying attention to the nature of relations between russia and the west is not unusual, it can be accepted to some extent , but when you claim freedom of the media
2:52 am
and at the same time you access all the russian media through sputnik , you access all these networks in any possible way. access to their network, their website, even when you search for news that, for example, sputnik or in some these european countries, their governments forced google , if a citizen enters and, for example, searches for arti network, which belongs to russia, it is not included in google's results at all . you will not be shown as internet anymore . another point, rome, if i want to add, outside of the context of the war in ukraine and the aggression of the zionist regime in gaza and the palestinian territories
2:53 am
, the scope of the dual behavior of the united states of america is wider. beijing government criticized while you look at the other side of the coin inside america. friends, if you have a chance, there is a site called police violence mapping , which actually publishes the statistics of police violence in the united states. i was looking at it just a few minutes ago before the conversation began . there were 191 deaths in conflicts that the police actually committed. and killed people by shooting or by violent actions and interesting.
2:54 am
if you are black in the united states , the probability that you will be killed by the police in a conflict is 3 times higher, which means assault and racial discrimination and the complex there are some of these incidents in the united states, but when these issues are raised abroad , we always have this claim. well, we have to defend them, and again, the basis of human rights is not legal, the basis is definitely political and in economic cases, look at the resistance groups , in cases where they are defending the independence of the countries , they are easily labeled terrorism by the united states. muttahida refers to these groups, but on the one hand, we have the official reports of the american media . again, i emphasize that the reports published by the americans themselves show us we had direct support for terrorist groups like isis, the letters that were published were exposed and
2:55 am
this was shown by various other groups that i think you are the group of hypocrites. but the interesting thing about the hypocrites is that the reason they were included in america's assassination list was that these terrorists had assassinated some of the americans themselves , however, the americans removed them from the list a few years later. actually, what if we want to examine the behavior of the united states? for ukraine and for the issue of gaza , duality of behavior is based on the interests that may be created for this country in these wars. ok , there is the main thing that should be taken into consideration. yes, thank you. i have two questions. let's see how far we can get. recently, a series of polls have been conducted in america, especially
2:56 am
when it comes to the range of people from 18 to 2. four years to 30 years has amazing results. in the last case , which was conducted by harvard through the haris institute, 52 % of american youths do not agree with the two-state solution proposed by the americans, but with the one-state solution that the government palestine is okay, they know that 52% of the new generation of america thinks like this, what happened to this public opinion. it has become so different from the official policies of the government . well, if you are not upset, i will say that it is not surprising . it is part of the reality, that is, if we see such a survey, it is a realistic reflection that we see among the young people not only in the united states, but all over the world. look , let's leave america for a bit. in the past few weeks, in various european countries, where the young people came
2:57 am
, they finally supported palestine, and this shows that the approach of the governments is actually it is not a correct reflection of the collective will and the will of public opinion in different european countries. this is one point. the second point is that in the united states , basically, not only in the issue of the zionist regime, but in general, trust in the government has decreased drastically in the past years. survey now, the surveys that have been done are different. i prefer to refer to the survey conducted by the pew center, which shows that in the past years, the trust in the us government has fallen below 20%, and this is a serious gap and duality in the field.
2:58 am
it shows the politics of the united states. but back to the issue of the zionist regime well, look, cutting off the internet , using all media tools, official officials , i don't know, someone is angry, someone is crying at the camera, isn't it, for example , those 18, 19, 20,000 people who were killed in palestine, these are all bad people. this literature , in fact, all these discourses and efforts are made for the young generation in the united states, which is interesting , they sometimes call this generation the "what over generation", that is , a generation that politically has a lot of ups and downs , at least as much as the country. like iran, they are very busy now, basically, in the field what is happening in politics, they have nothing to do, you can see what borders violence, conflict and injustice have crossed, that the generation in the united states who once
2:59 am
did not care much about politics, as they say , do not care now and in one of the issues of foreign policy, now this i would like to add rome's point in parentheses, foreign policy is an issue that americans have a very direct relationship with domestic policy, so don't be too deep, that is , economic discussions, insurance, health, etc. in reality, it increases it more. that yes in you can see this look among the young generation . thank you, mr. main , for being present in the world today . i also say goodbye to the viewers of the khabar network. have a good night.
3:00 am
in the name of god, the most high council of the cultural revolution, by the decision of the members of this council, hojjat al-islam ameli was elected as the head of the council for the development and promotion of human sciences. according to the secretary of the supreme council of the cultural revolution, in the continuation of the meeting, after examining the statutes of the academy of sciences, the possibility of creating new scientific groups and the limit of continuous members of the academy were finally approved. another cause of this council was the approval of the national music document.
25 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
IRINNUploaded by TV Archive on
