dear began, i'm saying goodbye to channel 1. follow the conversation on khabar channel . well, as i announced to you , the bahman motor company's decision on high-selling violations was announced today . let's take a look at the process of dealing with this case. the organization for the protection of expensive sales fell to 900 billion tomans. at first, it announced that a report was sent to the government penalty organization . a fine of 14 thousand billion tomans was issued in the court

of first instance . it was economic in 1401 that the organization tazirat authorizes that they can consider a factor of five times for crimes, in order to deter the punishments, they ask for an abstract , and the government penal organization inquires from the support organization. the support for the tazirat organization was not convincing and the process will be prolonged until today the final verdict will be announced. the fine of 5 thousand billion tomans for bahman company has increased from 16 thousand billion tomans to 5 thousand billion tomans. question about the program let's ask for a report, my friends will prepare this report, we will come back and start the conversation . bahman khodro company's conviction was confirmed.

finally, the final verdict of the bahman high street sale case was issued. after two years from the time of violation. the final conviction of more than 5 thousand billion tomanishes was confirmed. it was last year that this case was filed in the support organization and sent to the punishment organization. their price is about 900 billion tomans. finally, tazirat considers a fine of 14,000 billion tomans, a request for reconsideration and a series of documents to that branch. submitting and from this appeal, the back-and -forth of the case between the two support and punishment organizations began . again, this organization's response was sent to the general administration through letter number 993 264 dated 206 1402. the aforementioned is sent

. the previous answer was not slanderous. the answer must be in a way that can convince our investigating judge that this accusation is directed at the accused. the sed and sima news agency repeatedly followed up on the outcome of the case. from the violation of overselling of an assembly car company two years ago, there are still two punishment and support organizations. in the two ministries, the position and justice go hand in hand and even go to the ministers we went to the judiciary , their cases are in the process of investigation, and it should be decided that we should announce that this side should be followed up by the relevant authorities . 5 thousand billion tomans is our rule for determining the punishment or the punishment depending on the amount. it is a violation that

is reported to us based on the expert opinion of the custodian institutions. reza safari, radio and television news agency. yes. mr. mohammad ali esfanani, the spokesperson of the government compensation organization , is our guest in this program. we tried from we invite the officials of producers and consumers support organization to attend the program . we also talked with the friends of the ministry of tradition. preferring that they do not participate in this program is a support organization that they should handle the complaints of the people who go there first and then refer them to the government penal organization, but in any case, they are not ready to respond. be responsive, mr. esfanani . you are very welcome. thank you in the name of allah, the most merciful. mr. esfanani

the high sale case was 900 billion tomans , in the first court a fine of 14 thousand billion tomans was considered. when it is issued , the appeal will not be decided right there, but when the appeal is manifested, it will be dealt with again in the appeal stage, based on 13,800 billion tomans, or the same 14,000 billion that was stated , that was the amount of the initial violation that was announced. 900 billion tomans of bahman motor co and based on that, according to the law, the punishment provided in the law for overselling

is 2 to 5 times, which the honorable head of the investigating branch considered three times and based on the interview of the coordinating council. we base it on the report announced by the consumer protection organization. they asked another question about the issue, and in our response , they announced the amount of the initial violation as 500 billion tomans instead of 900 billion tomans . it happens even in judicial proceedings , such things happen in terms of the organization

the support has made a mistake in the initial review, you should see it, dear ones, you should answer, but no, it may not have been a mistake, it may be based on the expert opinion that has been made, because after all, when an expert gives a technical opinion, it may be different from the opinion of another expert, or factors and reasons may be effective in the so-called amount of money that they announce , the difference is several hundred million. we have some cases in the discussion of the smuggling case, which i would like to say, right now, our primary branch is based on that basis. the customs announced that the defendant will be fined 2500 billion tomans in the appeal, when he was asked about the re-evaluation, which is the right of the accused to object to the evaluation, he protested, the re-evaluation that was made

was lower than that amount. tajmaran inquired about the amount of minutes considering that the defendant is the same company. bahman khodro has provided reasons that the amount declared as 900 billion tomans is not real according to these documents, so it is either based on a mistake, something was wrong in the calculation , he inquired again, naturally, since it is based on 900 one billion tomans has decreased to 500 billion tomans . naturally, the amount of fines has also decreased from 13 billion to 13,800 billion tomans to 5 thousand billion . the number of cars is known. how many cars were there? i don't know exactly how many there were, but the amount must have been specified in the report supported by the organization. well, it is known how many came to complain. anyway, is this

the fine that is being considered now ? i have to pay my people's money or not, how did i reject this? see, this is not a question of the plaintiff's complaint. now i will give you another example, for example, a company there is another one, if the vote is confirmed , we will definitely tell the dear people, that is khodros, yes , it is from the same car manufacturers, about 220 people, the last statistics i had, people came to complain about the high price of cars that were sold to them. naturally, there are 2,200 cases filed in each case, the amount of violation is specific. it is clear that any amount that was received in excess must be returned to the plaintiff, but in this case, which is being discussed, this

is the violation report that the support organization reported. the period of time when this number of cars were sold. in the beginning, they said the amount of violation was 900 billion tomans, later it was changed to 500 billion. now , if someone bought a car in that period , they can make a complaint about the same period , but al-qaeda. in the preparation law, it is clearly stated that if someone causes damage to another or oversells, in addition to being sentenced to a fine , he must also reject the excess received to the account of the government fund to those from whom the excess is now in the same period of 1400 people. those who bought and led to the same decision and led after being fined, how can they complain to the punishments

, they can also complain to the punishments, and they can also demand the additional claim received from the courts according to the provisions of our so- called civil law. he bought 1400 from bahman company so and so in a month to come and file a complaint . why don't you announce this? now i'm announcing it officially. the complaint was not filed by the branch we are not required to return this amount, but according to the rules and principles that govern our proceedings, the person who overpaid is entitled to receive the overpayment . well, now bahman company has other cases. damages or not, car companies are reported to have committed many violations, one of them

is the issue of high prices. in the past years , we had a lot of cases about 30,000 cases in terms of non-fulfillment of the obligation that they had received money from people to provide them with cars. in tehran province, it was investigated that, well, after masababeh, in fact, the board general court of administrative justice jurisdiction. he referred this particular issue to the courts, and we will not deal with them anymore. let's ignore other cases and violations such as high selling, such as offering or offering counterfeit goods, and now there are examples such as refusing to offer and the like, which are also called hoarding. it is mentioned that there are different car manufacturing companies that we can announce all of them in the form of a list later if necessary.

because it was not the basis of our conversation, he did not get statistics, but we can provide you with this immediately in one office hour. so , how is this fine going to be collected? who has taken the data? look, when the decision is issued and it is final, this decision is valid and must be implemented. that

he should come and pay the fine, we had other debts that were significant , for example, we had some companies that are considered to be government companies, they were sentenced to about 120 billion, and they were fully collected , fortunately, this year's collections are the same as the honorable head of the organization also said in his morning interview.

the legislator has considered works that can be divided even for them, the authority of the honorable head of the organization and the honorable minister of justice have been considered as law for him, and i can even suggest that they take measures to collect money in a way that does not harm the car manufacturer. and the production line should be shut down. and not the execution of a decree that has become certain will remain unenforced. all right. thank you very much, mr. jamshid imani, chairman of the board of directors of bahman motor. hello to you, i say hello to you and the esteemed viewers , thank you very much, mr. imani, we are giving you this opportunity to ask questions from you. regarding this case and now the process of the events that have happened now, let's ask

you about the pricing in 1400, the support organization did the pricing, mr. imani. the car has been sold. first of all, i would like to thank you for today's meeting. until now, this report that you first aired was broadcasted on all radio and television channels, and bahman group was never given the opportunity to defend itself, but today i am very thankful that the organization was given this opportunity. support based on the implementation of the general policies of article 44 and according to the explicit opinion of the competition council from 2008 in relation to... basically, assembled cars do not have the right to enter and have not been rejected, that's why this 1400 report , which is the reason for amending, the law on the implementation of general policies, article 44 and the law related to the competition council, clause 5, article 58

, has given the competition council the authority to set prices. and article 92 of the same law. all the laws and regulations are contrary to the law on the implementation of all policies. therefore , the law of the support organization in relation to the issue of cars entered by the competition council , especially the cars related to the bahman group , has been recognized as competitive, in fact, it has no right to enter. because the organization did not give price support in 1400 and it is in the list of goods. as the pricing of the car is subject to compliance with the pricing , it is not listed anywhere. they refer to an order of the first year of 2089, which is based on the same executive law of the main general policies 44, which is also repealed. in addition , the heads of the forces and the supreme council of executive policies

article 44 in the year 2011 emphasized again that all laws and regulations are with the law. the implementation of the general policies of article 44 is obsolete, which means that this first order , on the basis of which the support organization prepared this report , is an obsolete order. this is the only reason why it did not enter here. what are we doing all these days? in the year 1400, after that , we always announced our price to the support organization, even based on this price, a fabric was registered in the system. once in the reports that we gave , no one objected to us that, sir, your price is based on iran's calculations, the main reason for this issue. the reduction that was mentioned, the property of 1400 from 14 to, for example, now it is 5 to 5. this is the reason, the organization finally accepted that

until the approval of the heads of the forces, which was done on 27 28 7 104 , it is not a negative process. he came and reduced this by 8 months. the same 5,000 that i am offering now, the same 5,000 is also illegal 1000 is also illegal for two reasons , we have a decree of the heads of power in the year 29 5 97 97 , which was approved by the supreme leader, paragraph 3 clearly states that any decision regarding the rates and conditions of pricing and determining the quota of a quantity of goods and services which according to the laws and regulations are available to different institutions and councils, subject to the approval of the market regulation headquarters, the market regulation headquarters held a meeting in tower 8, 1400 and

does not enter the cars that are not subject to competition council pricing , that is, for the same reason as this 8 months should have been reduced i said that from 2008 to 2011, i was responsible for pricing, and i don't know about bahman group cars, which are recognized as competitive under the pricing rules . how do you sell? at all, if you pay attention, this case has problems from the beginning, 29 9 1401 of the organization. the support that claims that we violated without informing us, even the copy according to the law, should

have given us the fourth copy of this letter that he wrote in the comments, they do not give us this on the exact date. i am at your service on friday 9/10 , 91 401. the former honorable minister gave an interview that, sir , we want to punish a car manufacturer. where is the process of the trial conducted in such a way that you and the minister before him send a message to do an interview, the next day a summons comes and you show up for the next day ?

prepare the report, my friends, let's see the report , then we will come back, continue the conversation with you, buyers of assembly companies, especially kerman car managers motor and lamari are all customers of farda motor company. complaints and protests of buyers of assembled cars due to promises and expensive sales. a tik pro car from the company of car managers, the amount they announced to me is 1 billion 6 thousand tomans. about 500 to 600 million tomans more money. 1 billion, 600, 50, 60 million is over for me. if the price is 1.45 billion. i bought a million, and the council price of this car was 1 billion and 100. the buyers say that

the assemblers did not comply with the approvals of the competition council and received additional amounts. in spite of that i registered my complaint both in the consumer protection organization and in the offices of madan tejarat industry organization and... in fact, these organizations have no responsibility to return the extra money that was taken from us. the officials of the consumer and producer protection organization say that a contract has been concluded or a sale has taken place that is in line with the prices of the competition council . those statistics are expensive and a case will be made and after the administrative procedures it will be sent to the government administration organization. until now, 242 the article has gone under sin bamaneh's system of management of an inspection cloth god willing, we are waiting for our colleagues with tazirat organization to take care of these. despite the complaint

to the organization for the support and mining industry and punishment, until now, the company of the car managers has not responded to this overpriced sale. some customers have complained directly to tazirat. now we have a complaint in tazirate, they should issue a verdict. we request the authorities to do so soon. from the beginning of the year until now, the submitted cases are waiting for the verdict of the government penalty organization, amir navaei of the sed and sima news agency, that is, unfortunately, the people who cannot go to the head of the support organization or the organization support them and announce their complaints so that this case can be investigated. we also invited the friends of the support organization to be accountable for not appearing in any of the programs . we have told the friends of the ministry to explain about this matter. anyway , the car manufacturers who

have been selling at high prices for a period of time should be accountable in this regard. mr. esfanani, anyway, some people should be punished. they also refer to the complaints they have now, what should they do? these are some of the people who announced their complaints to us. send now you say. yes , i told you, based on the same complaints that people have announced in some provinces, because most of the automobile companies, because their main office is in tehran, they are usually handled in tehran. we have filed about 220 cases so far due to public complaints i would like to inform our dear people that they are contacting us directly , even if they apply in writing to any of the provinces , they are obliged to take their complaints and if necessary , send them to tehran for processing. or

should i ask them to register a complaint in our 135 system i would like to ask them to refer to the support organization through the 124 system. if they register a complaint , they will send it to us and we will handle it . regarding the refund of the extra receipts , which i have mentioned as examples, you should also announce, if it comes in certain intervals, that for example , 100 cases of 1000 cases of these orders have been issued . okay, because we don't open such news anyway thank you for coming today and answering our questions, sir, we are ready . god willing, whatever verdict is issued and becomes final , we will definitely announce with the name of khodros company that

the necessary effect of this case, which you said , is 2,200 people from our company. when are you going to announce this ? i told them that there are 2,200 cases that i have counted. about 1,800 cases have been voted on by the primary branch . god willing, the opinion will be finalized. i think we will be able to announce their names in the next one or two weeks . the number of violations is known. i said that it is different because in every case there is one plaintiff and one the car is mentioned. the number must be different. well, this is a self-assembly company , right, mr. imani. now, in this report that you also saw, there were other companies that people complained about during that period. were you the only one who had high sales? now the discussions let's put that case aside, how did it go

? there was no name from us , the honorable guest of the program who pointed out that the complainant did not come to the punishment service regarding our case, these 2,200 people are not us either. the company of khovosaz assembly company is another company. it is true , sir, that their name was mentioned in your report , but it is not our name. fortunately , your name was not in our report. yes, see in this report . we are a stock exchange. first of all, apart from reporting monthly to our support organization , we also publish our reports monthly . let's say we had an expensive sale where the price of our competitors on that

date was 30% below the price, except for the exception layer our competitors sold our cars at 1400 prices . this can be cited and traced both in the information that we published on kodal and in different sites from the sites that usually put prices in the 124 system of the organization that supports all the prices. mr. imani , how was it compared to other car manufacturers? our prices were 30% lower. 30% of you were convicted of overselling with this 30% less, which means they are also overselling. when you see 30% of us, we believe that in general, because cars are competitive , according to the approval of the competition council, competitive cars are defined. it is characteristic that we do not defend those who sell grams, but legally

, the price of a car that is competitive is much better. mr. esfanani, regarding this matter, if i have, please see with the respect i have for mr. imani. first of all, there are two points to be made: one is that these proceedings are not justified in this style, all the material that has been said is the content of the defense, which has been heard both in our primary branch and in our opinion branch. naturally, if the defense can be it was acceptable and justified. this vote would have been issued in a different style .