one year later, the car 's engine broke down. we took it to the repair shop. in the repair shop, we went under the car and looked under the car. they said that this car has two parts . when we bought it, we went to toy the number plate and toy plate toy. we found out that this car is completely left-handed and 50 different cases of violation and fraud are possible during a transaction . 100 thousand families are involved. at least 400,500 thousand people are involved they become the subject and then see 100,000 cases of hearing, investigation, judgment and arbitration, and what a heavy cost the country will end up with from these words. people's problems in this market from the representative's eyes.

have access to ownership and car records. the buyer and the seller can access the information of the other party's qualification and the vehicle inquiry before entering into the purchase. god willing, friends vote. the end of voting was approved. 9 months have passed since the approval of the law, but there has been no news of the implementation of the law. one of the monitoring tools of the active parliament

the commission came forward and as a special commission overseeing the laws passed by the parliament , called the institutions, spoke and got to work . the commission came to work on article 90 and brought many people along . according to the constitution, one of the duties of the parliament is to follow up on pending laws and regulations. it is like this meeting that was held with the real estate registration organization. and among several issues that the registration organization can help with, provide this information to these private platforms first. the first step of this law was implemented in mehr 1402. faraja and central insurance provided their information to the public. people don't get caught. the police will not get caught. the judicial system will not be caught either. in relation to the authenticity of the car, get the desired information to see if this car is impounded or not or other information. which can help the transparency of the transaction

, such as knowing how many times this car has been in an accident and how much damage insurance has paid. the following month, in the second step of law enforcement, it was possible to access judicial records related to the transaction . is this power of attorney really authentic or not? well, this is an important point , the party prohibits the transaction, the party has been given a restraining order, or the party has received several financial punishments it means that this side should be careful in its financial transactions. it is actually difficult. now people can know what they need about the history of the car and the transaction before buying and selling. we just came to buy this car. it's not like the old days when we don't know if the car has a fault or had a serious accident. either he has a seizure or he is a prohibited person. that's why in the program that you enter the transfer, it says, sir, this document can be transferred.

in the seventh program, they approved the possibility of electronic registration of car transactions to be added to this system and this it means saying goodbye to forging paper promises of opportunity.

in the name of god , greetings, politeness, respect, your service, dear and respected viewers of the economic table program of the leader of the revolution, in his recent meeting with the people of kerman and khuzestan province, a key word was emphasized, and it was a real competition, as one of the pillars of the election, in an explanation. this real competition means that the field should be open for the presence of various political, economic and cultural trends in the big election contest, which means that all views and views can be active in this election and you know that this is one of the issues about it. there are many different views on the issue of stabilization or floating of the exchange rate, which is the topic of our economic table today. the parliament has dealt with this issue in different periods. today, we want to address the same issue at the economic table. if we meet together, i told you that

there are different views on how to manage the country's currency. we have a law. article 20 of the law on permanent decrees of the country's development plan says that you should set the land rate in a floating manner. floating management. i ask you to decide what it means that you don't have a stabilization policy, but this policy of stabilizing the afghan currency has opponents , it has different views, and it was implemented in different periods by different governments, we had 42 , we had 28 to 500. there are experts who believe that we should, that is, the government should have a stabilization on the exchange rate, a new supervision. it should have a specific number. on the other hand, there is another point of view that says no, the government should open up the space and look at supply and demand. it is very oppressive. it should not be created because the width spring, for example , will not

be large in number later. they justify themselves and argue a proposition. we are ready to see him together, let's go back and start our conversation about the same issue that i have presented to you .

if you are present , we will talk about the same issue that i have presented to you. in addition , i would like to say hello to both guests of the program. let me start, mr. durodian, we couldn't see the report, but anyway, we saw the policy of stabilization in the past few days. different governments have implemented it in different ways and at different prices . what is your opinion about this policy? how much help do you think it can be for us to manage the exchange rate market? do you think this policy is basically a successful policy or not? in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, i greet the people of iran and all the viewers of this program, please see the stabilization of the land, or in other words, the cheapening of the land, according to the conditions we are in now. to be i know all of these are synonyms now for the reason that, firstly, stabilization after even if it is not stabilized at a cheap price, in the end stabilization itself considering that we are an economy with inflation will eventually lead to the cheapness of the currency from two

beasts . we can look at it, one is that this is the right thing to do from an economic point of view, and one before that is, for example, is it possible or not for a country in economic conditions. look, i don't want to go into it too much. anyway, the main function of currency in the economy is imported, now the import of goods and services or the outflow of capital. the economy of demand for something that exists abroad , a cheap currency that is worth a good price , is good, meaning low compared to other prices . in your opinion, is it right or is cheap supply means fueling the demand for what is available abroad , because the main function of supply is the demand for foreign things? when

we look at it, of course, the general public likes it, because when prices are high, it means more imports the price is good, we feel abundant. we feel precious, but it's actually a short -term pleasure, exactly like these harmful foods, such as sweets and i don't know, soft drinks, and things like that, which give us a boost in the moment we 're enjoying it, but in the end , it weakens the structure of the economy. it is correct, so it is incorrect in your opinion . the exchange rate is not stable for the economy. do you agree with it or is it the stabilization of the exchange rate, which will ultimately lead to the currency and the exchange rate right now , or it will ultimately lead to a cheap currency for the economy, for the production sector and the sector. it is really a destructive thing if things don't get cheap, for example , what do you agree with? you know what it doesn't get cheap, what does it mean now, suppose we look at the past, in our economy, in

the years when we have a stable supply, that is, the supply is almost constant, like the 80s and 92s to be specific, if you look at the average , we have about 14 inflation in these years , of course, in those years when the economy is restless and unstable, in those years the average is 33, which shows that the currency is an important factor. it is important for inflation, but i want to say that even in the years when the width and stabilization of the currency, that is, the width of the market, you will not see the stabilization. two rates, because we are talking about what we are talking about now, it is actually possible to establish an official market-wide preferred exchange rate that does not work under our policy, even in those years when we had one currency . otherwise, it was a market exchange rate and it was a fixed loan rate. we had an average inflation rate of 14-15% per year. and this means that 92 to 1996 was a little less, it was less, but for example

, in 2007, you can see that it is 25%, because in any case, those years of 2006 are special years . kind of it has been suppressed, the spring has been compressed . i want to say this. when you say that the currency is stabilizing for an economy that , even in the conditions of currency stabilization, is the effective stabilization of the country , that is, where there is only one rate, and you have 15% inflation, it means that gradually when you stabilize if you continue, it means that this product is getting cheaper compared to other goods and services , it means that the price is going down, and the demand is overflowing, it is getting denser, the demand is decreasing and finally adjusting, i want to say that it is basically stabilizing. currency for an economy with our coordinates, especially in the situation we are in now an impossible thing is not possible at all. we are an economy in the condition of transverse tension, in the condition of transverse tension , and the necessity of this situation is not cheap and the width

is not fixed naturally. do it now, for example, at 420 , or now at 28, 500, or any other number that will lead to a price gap in the long term, mr. gholami, what do you think , do you think it should be done differently or not? let the stabilization policies continue as we have seen in the past allah. i believe that stabilization is not a choice , it is a requirement. if we don't stabilize, what should we do, which market should we leave to the smuggling market ? the price is constantly rising. it was 60 tomans . where do we let it go up? who should stop it? who should intervene in the mechanism

of the country's economy, if we know what we mean, you think that stabilization will prevent it. yes, yes, yes, we put the fluctuations on the government, in the meantime , stop the external fluctuations , what is the purpose of limiting the currency? because we are in a few we implemented the stabilization policy period in different models , the result is not what you did not implement during the stabilization policy, in 420 the stabilization policy was not implemented. let me introduce it. what is the structure of the country's economy , don't we plan for the country 's economy? they can be middlemen and capital of raw materials, the rest are strategic, like wheat, like rice . that means ward. when you increase the supply

, all these things will increase accordingly and directly affect the production. they will increase the producer price index in egypt, and then they will increase the consumer price index and inflation. we had currency, we were in the grip of time , the prices are changing, these new prices are from the production route, i am not saying the expected prices , i am not saying the precautionary prices, they are separate, on the side of this , on the demand side, on the supply side of the currency, what do you have , do you export. will your exports increase with the increase of the currency, not the last 34 years? your export has tripled. no, no , export is a function of production until it is not produced. therefore, the increase will not lead to exports , so if it happens, what will it export from your and mine table, cucumbers, tomatoes, and oranges, and from your land , it will export raw materials and natural resources, they will export sponge iron , they will export steel, they will export soil. they export water, which means you are against mr. dorian. let me see, you got the point

. on the side of currency supply, the gentlemen who say leave the market are saying. don't do it, so what do you do, give way, others , what is the logic of the one who says give way, sir, give up the price the desire for currency covers exports and reduces imports. at some point, a balance will be reached. i say that there will never be a balance. at the price of 200,000 tomans , it will not happen. because when this happens , your demand is inelastic. your supply is inelastic. the system is different, that's what he showed, every time we gave up until we went somewhere , so let me ask mr. drodian the same thing, mr. drodian, you, us and people who think like you believe in such and such a thing that the price of the dollar will be abandoned or the currency will be abandoned. this incident that mr. rasem refers to in the presence of you gholami happened give it or not, something else, this title of your program is a spectrum of stabilization or flotation, because flotation also means that the government should not do anything, you have to wait for the market to see what happens to it , well, this is not the right idea, the correct idea is that we

stabilize we can't abandon the market rate, that is, our main goal should be to manage the behavior of the exchange rate in the free market , because the anchor of inflation expectations is what people look at and price their own goods, the preferred rate. it is not your official, free market rate is completely contrary to their order it is your order that you said that mr. tasbit should not be tasbit, mr. gholam says that tasbit should be tasbit, i say, look, you see, for an economy like ours, which is suffering from a horizontal bottleneck, look at our per capita exports in 1990, if for every iranian king , now the index of the number is not important, the index if you take 100, this number reached 100 in 1998, 38 out of 100 reached in 1990, 38 in 99, 32 in

1400, our weight has improved. it happened for real. something happened to you. the economy that we are in means that access our supply has decreased , we don't have the amount that we used to supply, now we don't have the amount that we wanted to supply, it is now much more than what it was in the past, this is a reality and this is reflected in the exchange rate of the free market, and we don't like it. if we don't have it, it manifests itself there and it imposes its own demands and requirements on the economy. look, this is a very important point. we should start stabilizing, not stabilizing . we should control the behavior of the free market exchange rate so that the upward trend is inevitable. in our economy, according to the coordinates i said that now we have sanctions, the prospect of remaining sanctions, a reduction in oil exports, a reduction in the real price of oil in the world, if you look at a long-term trend, this has weakened us

in terms of currency compared to the past, so the exchange rate trend must be our economy is on the upswing , as i said, it is an economy that you , even though it is stabilized in the economy of 15 , have inflation, so this is coming, it will sit again on the exchange rate , so the increase in the exchange rate is a natural process, the requirements of this economy, the requirements of the situation that we have our art is that they say the same thing, they say you you stabilize it, you say you don't stabilize it , for example, 200 thousand is correct, you shouldn't let it be 200, see the point, the point is that if you do n't stabilize at the rate of 5 thousand tomans, if the rate is land. i would like to say that controlling the behavior of the free exchange rate in a way that you can see, we have accumulative foreign exchange resources, our problem is that basically we do not recognize the free market land rate to a large extent, we

have significant transverse resources, if we come to our currency at low rates well, naturally , finally. the center should intervene at a low rate , not stabilize it, stabilize it at all at a low rate your currency resources will be lost and you will also lose the possibility of controlling the free market, which means that the stabilization of the currency itself is a basis for free market prices to go out of control. mr. gholami, you accept this. yes, but what do we give and what do we get ? on the one hand, the collapse of the economy has the loss of reserves and resources of the country's human resources. he migrates because of the expensive currency, the resources of the country are being deflated, they are being drained because of currency takers, this is the collapse of the economy, this is the stabilization, which may have billions of years of corruption, which one will we choose, i am wise. i fixed the choice well, we had stabilization in 97 and we have stabilization. we have never stabilized. 28 tomans is not stabilization. according to you, no, how many rates do you have today

? what is your idea, just one, for example, a central one , came in the name of stabilization, but it actually stabilized the seat itself, it did not stabilize anything . give it to others so that the people's table is not harmed like this. there is no work at all , there is no monitoring mechanism. stabilization means having a rate and supporting the rate, no matter what the rate is. your opinion, i am talking about the price, so now we have accepted that the market should not be free, if the market should not be free, someone should intervene. talk, well, only until we are rejected, that is, you say 38 tomans and, for example , put aside 28 tomans, put aside 4,200 altogether , put aside what number you reach, reach a rate, the rate we call social welfare economy , increase social welfare, what rate increase social welfare

it allows you to see the land from one side to the consumer market it enters the production market from one side . that was the time of 420. we only had 420 and we didn't have any more width. then it was half time . i'll tell you the story now. mr. first vice president at the time of the president got up one morning and said, "we want to make a wish." 420. we have to ask them that in order to do this, have you calculated how much is the country's actual need, how much is the country's actual supply , what is your plan, which goods should be included in the list, which items should not be included in the list , mr. choub was importing wood from russia until yesterday without land 420 he came to page 420 in order registration consolidation has necessary requirements, which is not here, so you believe that that particular method was not consolidation at all , it was a slogan, it was a word, what is consolidation, now i say when.

let me start, first of all, i will reverse the direction of supply . what will i do? first of all , what i say, mr. doctorian, will not be denied. no one will deny it. how do you get it? well, with the equipment you have, it is very possible. go ahead , sir, we have so many ports, we can manage it. don't stop it. i don't know why, because there is no greatness

for it, it is possible to accept it. so, so far, mr. dordian has not accepted. you said that mr. dordian has accepted so far. let's see if they accept that part of our request is about smuggling. they say that i cannot stop it. we have to find a solution , and this cannot be done with a button. for example, we can say that smuggling is stopped. yes, we have a land border, a sea border, a sea border , and our ports. here, we are the 13th government. so far, none of the 13 governments have the country's customs. you have 147 customs points, how much do you import? about 50 billion dollars, how can 20 billion dollars be imported other than through customs , how many trucks will be 20 billion dollars , how many ships will it be, it's not like this, it's possible , it's possible, what should be entered , what are you going to enter it? . second, 20 billion dollars is here. 10 billion dollars is capital outflow . capital outflow is prevented by intensive outsourcing. they say that i

will outsource the majority of it. why is the cost of outsourcing the hundred percent of the exit sources ? that is the optimal rate now that is the optimal rate, it is the same optimal rate . when the army contract is implemented , they say it is not possible. why is it not possible? when a product is exported and a product is imported , you can monitor at least 10 points, at least from the certificate of origin to the shipping company and financing. it doesn't matter how many people we have to monitor. i design the system . there is no need for a person to design the system. we tried it once. the same system we designed now goes to you. i am talking about 20 billion dollars no, not at all, i am saying something much simpler . the new thing is that they say that we did it and we succeeded. the result is that you have to authenticate every transaction. what does the buyer and seller do? i first determine the number, then i determine the person . look, you have 30, 40,000 merchants who have marketing cards . there are 34,000 people scattered in 30 provinces. each province has a thousand of you.

we have a free market that is smuggled, which means that we are at all, tell us a price. today, if i want to calculate with everyone, tell me the number, we have to do an exact calculation, i would say it is around 12 to 18. but what i know now, below all these rates and above 420, i at least know that the direction should be downward, so i wrote in all my points that the direction of the rate should be downward.

is it cheap, mr. drodian , you tell me, let me ask mr. drodian this price, mr. drodian, with all the technical reviews and everything that exists , how much should the basic land price be today , between 12,000 and 18,000 tomans or not? a competitive market means that the number of suppliers and demand there are many suppliers, which means that it is more than a controllable limit. basically, talking about how much the price should be in that market is a joke . talk about it being controlled. it makes sense, but in a competitive market, in which our broad market is our free currency market, and it is a competitive market. in the market, the price doesn't matter at all, how much should the price be? you can say any price. these days, you have seen, for example, between 495 and 495. this

is what the bridegroom's house says. ok, in the same sense as the other side says, sir, if you have this sea if you pour enough yogurt, you will get buttermilk. this is true on paper. it is not logically impossible, but the problem is that in a conventional sense, you see policies that are based on control and supervision, these policies are unrealistic in an economy like ours, in a country like ours, which is a big country anyway. a country with a wide power, bureaucracy, executive system is characteristic of us

. however, you are in a bottleneck, it is you who is not mr. gholam , it is not the issue at all where you are with 1 percent. just as the experts say , you can shake the economy in 2030, where you have to sit, the transactions of thousands of people, where we actually have , we are chanting, sir, for example , let 's stop smuggling. what can be done? well, everything is done . we don't need to do anything. after that, if we can stop the smuggling of 20 billion dollars. i will tell you the price now, sir, it is 10,000 i will give you tomans. now your wealth is more in terms of foreign currency, or if the dollar is 40,000 tomans, it is a cheap currency that causes more capital outflow . one of the reasons why it cannot be a cheap currency is that when you offer