the third form and its third approach was related to the convention on the war of the seas, of course , there were supplementary statements to these conventions based on the process of military actions that were formed, and recommendations were also formed to complete the process of the convention, which in the second hague conference, approximately these conventions were upgraded to 13 conventions. that air wars, the type of actions that took place at the end of the first world war , when the planes were placed in the war zone and the shelters were attacked by themselves, in fact, the space changed a little, and the process of dealing with war crimes and genocide based on type the trials that happened in the past from versailles and nuremberg can almost be said. these

processes have been formed until today, but today's vote , i believe , is a special difference from the type of votes that were in the past . belgium almost created similarities, but you said from the beginning what is the milestone of this milestone and what is the difference? i would like to say this turning point that in fact, today south africa took an action to restore its dignity, which is in the concentration and gravity of the system between the international community is in the field of fighting racism and apartheid, because it itself suffered and actually suffered during the apartheid period, so it considers itself obligated to defend human rights in this field and to condemn the actions of the zionist regime

, specifically the act of genocide and he knows against humanity and humanity. this is one point, the second turning point is that we are witnessing an emerging phenomenon in the world today under the title of global antarctic community or global south , which can almost be said to have been initiated from the group of 20 summit in new delhi for the first time and we are a this is the last meeting. the recent summit was keyed and almost it can be said that we have an emerging phenomenon in the international system called the global south. you can see, for example, the types of cases that are present in the proceedings of the international court of justice are african judges, and that africa is the index of the international system after the treaty of westphalia in 1648 and the europeans, after the 30-year

european wars, see themselves as they introduce the index of institutionalism, this is a special and valid feature, on the one hand, and secondly, in fact, they are breaking the ranks in the field of fighting genocide against humanity and war crimes against humanity, and this has a distinctive feature because you know that the palestinians are not a state or a country and the oslo agreement actually led to the establishment of a palestinian state for the palestinians. naturally, palestine is not a member of an international organization, it is not a member of the united nations, and this non-membership does not establish the legitimacy of the legal process for palestine through palestinian complaint handling institutions, but recently, 75 years of occupation has reached a point where these palestinians themselves they cannot say that genocide has been committed against us while giving palestine or an authority in the form

of a committee to deal with racial discrimination no more than what i want to say is that this is not comparable at all in terms of reconciliation, that is, the process of the bill that was carried out based on south africa's complaint is not comparable to the action of palestine in the racial discrimination committee. more formal and better action is needed and in the case of genocide proceedings, such as south africa's complaint, bill, and petition, some and a number of south africa's complaints and documents and evidence have been accepted by the other side

. israel's request to stop the proceedings is accepted. this milestone and index point is not located it is a story, but this is a long -term process. it should be revealed that after these conditions, the documents will be taken from both sides, because there are approximately 14 judges, and the two judges from the plaintiff parties , israeli and south african , are also in this process. the most important thing is that now the situation of third countries is not involved in this story. should be dealt with through international institutions, but the weakness of lack of military force for icj, the request

to refer south africa to the security council may be realized . for a stop and a ceasefire, because now the important thing is that the south african observer was able to get the ceasefire from the heart. genocide is happening through international processes organizations affiliated to the united nations, such as anorwa , have already received these reports, that is, the united nations itself. having observed the act of genocide and genocide in gaza and the crime against humanity and arrived at these facts, naturally we have to wait to see

how the court verdict will proceed in its final form, which will probably take a little longer. let's go into detail, mr. zakir hossein, the measures that today the court asked the zionist regime to follow for one month and one month. this regime must be responsible for what china has done the international court of justice contains things said and unsaid that can be evaluated both in comparison with the request that the south african government had before and also in comparison with other reasonable orders in similar cases, that is, in connection with the kachhi genealogy issued by the court can actually be checked by an appraiser. regarding today's temporary order, the court in this temporary order issued to the israeli regime required it to fulfill its commitment to prevent the occurrence and commission of genocide through the acts of genocide that are mentioned in the genocide convention.

and also all of them were cited by the south african government, and based on them, israel was accused of committing acts of violence and threatened to prevent them, whether it was killing palestinians or preventing births among palestinians. what is also the imposition of conditions of life that are designed to destroy the palestinians by depriving them of access to the necessities of life, also obliges israel to actually try to maintain and prevent the alleged defects with positive evidence. to destroy them and destroy them in fact, it can be said that it implies that he knew to a large extent at least the possibility and danger of a conflict, which now obliges israel to preserve their positive evidence, and in fact , he has

committed the israeli regime not to interfere in them. and he is required to take all necessary measures immediately and effectively so that the people of gaza and the palestinian people have access to humanitarian and humanitarian aid . the effective and immediate form of the siege that gaza should be put in with this plan it should be resolved, especially since a few days ago, we had the positions of the secretary general of the national organization, he said that we cannot even provide aid to the areas inside gaza, and this is the same in the defense meeting that israel had two weeks ago. in this temporary order, the court referred to those statements, but said that these statements are not enough , what is actually the criterion and standard will be the practical result, an important unspoken fact that exists in this decision, and maybe that is why some people

think this. it should be noted that in fact this was not a victory for south africa, it was at the top south africa's demand was to issue a temporary order to stop the israeli regime's military operations . in fact, it is the same demand that was raised by akrani in the lawsuit of ukraine against the russian government based on the same kanvan neskashi, which was previously raised in the international court of justice. the demand has been demanded and based on that, the court required the russian government to suspend and stop all its military operations so that the court can actually investigate, but we should not consider this unsaid as a failure of south african legal activism. why, because first, if compared to yourself the story of ukraine and russia is completely in two different fields. you know that in the case of ukraine against russia, the case of ukraine and the claim of ukraine. the russian government has claimed that ukraine is committing genocide against the rostovs in eastern

ukraine, and based on the same genocide convention, which unites member states, including russia, to prevent genocide, the russian government has stated that in order to prevent genocide i will use all available measures, including military action, and attack to stop this destruction, but the matter is actually in the matter. gaza is completely different , that is, it is a question of the occurrence of nazdchi, and the court actually does not have the authority to enter into the actual dispute and the principle of war . he knew that his competence did not mean rejecting south africa's request, but it was because he could not comment on them , the subject and framework of his own dispute.

he had said that we are limited by the rules and the demands of south africa , there were restrictions after the court that he could not exactly, but by his side. he stated two things, which by the way are the victory, one is israel's commitment to prevent the massacre that they mentioned, and the other is that the israeli government actually obliged the israeli regime. to take care so that the army does not actually commit genocide means that he pointed this out and this means that in fact it implies that you accepted the signs of genocide that today diman and the israeli argument that he said i have a legitimate defense. i think that he had done the maneuver, he actually rejected it by saying that even if you have a legitimate defense, we will do it. there will be no permission to commit genocide. thank you . we have seen part of the reaction of the people of gaza to south africa's action

. we have other interviews of the people of gaza. my message to the international court of justice is to continue pursuing complaints against these crimes and we ask them until israel. do not stop committing these crimes against the palestinian people , continue to pursue them. every year zionists attack civilians and innocent citizens , commit crimes and massacres. we want to go to our homes in northern gaza let's go back we are living in a tent now , without blankets, without proper clothes, well, we are still with you

, and we want to examine the political effects of the court's vote today, mr. ferdowsipour, an interesting aspect of this story is that the zionists or a part of those jews who after world war ii belief. having a firm belief that the holocaust happened, they themselves formulated this genocide convention in a way that laid the foundation for its approval. now, after several decades have passed, we are witnessing that the same regime that came to power with the claim that genocide occurred in europe during the second world war and the oppression that followed it. elsewhere in the world, he formed a government in palestine, and he himself was accused. yes

, i would like to inform you that israel was fertilized almost after the correspondence that rocheld had with balfour, and in 1921 , the british house of commons approved the immigration of jews based on the information you mentioned, and since 1946, approximately the palestinian lands and expanding their occupation was based on the wars that continued from 1947-48. it can be said to expand after five wars, that is, at the end of the five wars with classical arab armies in 1973 they dominate most of the occupied lands . now the equation is such that it can be said that

they have more than 85% and what is the share of the palestinians is said to be less than 14-15%, that is, even. that the palestinians have the condition of their ancestral lands , which during this period of nearly 8 decades , we witnessed war crimes and war crimes of genocide and forced migration by the zionists and to none of the un treaties, from the partition treaty to the issue of yes yes, even the borders that become the united nations. forgiven and returned refugees to one to none these international agreements have not been adhered to. the most important point in this new situation and even the temporary and precautionary vote that was issued today, the most important point is that the zionist regime, along with the united states of america, as a strategic ally of the zionists and

israel, has always emphasized that nothing will happen here in gaza. it has not fallen and gaza has not actually suffered genocide and war crimes have not taken place, and if you pay attention, the united states of america, in all the news headlines and data processing it does in the media, takes over the media with the title that it has committed a crime at all. war we didn't, and this is an indicator and a proof that an international organization proved today that israel suffered genocide. and in order to stop this issuance of a precautionary decision and issue a temporary decision that the process of dealing with this case will be based on the documents, therefore, the fact that the palestinian people have the right to determine their own destiny in the territorial area is an indisputable right that today despite

the lack of what we witnessed through the security council and through the united nations is the process of stopping. the incessant firing and the relentless war and genocide that is taking place in gaza do not agree with this in any way if the security council does not issue a resolution to stop and cease fire, the incident that happened today can change the situation . have a cover unless this process goes to the security council and through the security council to see the situation naturally, without a doubt, this will have an impact, that is , the primary important point is that we are currently witnessing that the israelis are entering phase 3 or stage there are three and they are retreating, of course

in the name of making a tactical retreat or shortening the aimless action. they believe that , for example , they want to change the phase of the system of action against the area of ​​resistance, and this is based on the type of pressure that is being created through public opinion and through this court process . it won't happen, the pressure will be heavy. naturally, these withdrawals are based on the type of pressure that is being created in the political sphere through the process of dealing with this case . one of its consequences is that we should go towards reaching a ceasefire and a dialogue process based on the conditions of the parties

, one of the conditions of which is, for example, the exchange of the status of gaza, the return of gaza to its original status, the reopening of gaza to deal with aid. it is humanitarian and humanitarian that this was part of the process of issuing a precautionary decision, that is , it was part of the demands and requests of south africa in handling the case, and it can almost be said that this international body has decided to deal with this situation, but it is not a matter of how long the process is. the court can overturn this order this is the main and fundamental question that should have a support through complementary international institutions, which is a gift of the security council. if the security council cannot create this rhythm and capacity, it is likely that it will lead to the situation of the assembly. general.

it was a failure because they did not want a case to be opened against them in any way under the framework of mass killings and gen side, which was opened

. we have seen it day and night and in the programs in front of our eyes on tv and other places it's really painful, that is, it's really unacceptable , in the way that hud , the representative of the so-called united nations representative, wailed when he was being interviewed, that is. this is really a situation that in our life, in the history of our life , we have not seen such a tragedy in front of our eyes every night on our television

. i don't think that any of the oppressed palestinian people will be safe from being killed and crimes against them because of this court ruling today and tomorrow it should be safe because the only thing they said is yes, there is a case that needs to be dealt with from the point of view of jinn side and war killings and mass killings. but not saying something like this has already been done, firstly, secondly, all the proposals that were made were that the evil zionist government should

fulfill its international obligations against gen side . take a murderer to court, then the court will not give a verdict of murder, just say that it is illegal to kill a person, there is no way that a professional killer who is killing in this way will be killed. it won't stop the massacre, and they will tell them to give it a month later, then go and report whether the next steps will be to send the report to south africa and they

will think that 3 months have passed, at least 25,000 people have been killed, 70% of them are children and women. in this situation, such an order is really not even trying to stop the massacre . if such an order was given against the nazis in germany, the killing would have continued. this is really a disaster from that point of view really, i'm glad that such an order has been given, but from another angle, there is no real pain in preventing these killings. if

you pay attention to the judges who voted 15-16 to one or two , it shows that the americans are in favor , which means that this program was supposed to be more negative, that is, those who wanted to prevent this , the reason for not giving it was that this is the so-called principle. the content of the article that was voted on was so diluted that it really does not guarantee the lives of any oppressed people in palestine to prevent their killing. yes, mr. shajarei, another section now the issue is the role that some governments supporting this regime had, for example, we saw that germany had said before today that it wanted to

enter as a third party. let this case defend the zionist regime . do you think that the further investigation of the accusation of genocide in the hague court, what is going to happen from today , can somehow make the supporters of this regime move more aggressively, or in other words , they should not be sacked. one day , they want to enter such courts on their own, because in any case, the interpretation of genocide is a very serious charge, a serious charge , but by no means means you if all the sentences look, nowhere in any of the rulings has any so-called ruling been given, which means that the evil zionist government has committed genocide. i said it may have committed genocide

. this debate is possible because of this, and the way that these so-called masmalization of verdicts, in common parlance , has caused so many countries and the judges of these countries to vote in favor of it, because there is no danger to anyone , nothing to there is no way to prevent killing. i now think that the problem that has arisen is that it shows that international courts and the international bodies are all colonial and arrogant, that is, they are under the control of colonialism and arrogance, and they do not care in any way to prevent such killings, that is, this court is where it comes, now after 3 months of these

tragedies, which really make the people of the world a voice. all the people of the world have taken a step to stop this , they give us at least one more month to kill more, but in this aspect it is really a disaster, it shows that what is necessary for the future of humanity is that we these systems between international and international courts face the same. let's change it in such a way that it answers the request and the ordinary people of the world want justice . instead of mr. shajare, we will continue the conversation . i want to have mr. zakir hossein's opinion about these things that we have said. anyway , he has been following international criminal law for years. you are also accused of the field where international law was basically established. it was created

so that it can prevent such crimes in the international arena. mr. shajere says that there should be no hope, and just as that order is not ideal , it will not change the situation. we should not invest too much attention in this court. i am grateful to the guest mr. shajere for the points that he actually raised , maybe this is the point of view of many viewers and observers, but also also, ending the impunity of the perpetrators of international crimes is one of the goals set for it, but because there are incidents in the international arena anyway, and justice in