it is causing economic problems for us , which means it is causing inflation. my point is that the beginning of the chain and that producer sometimes received a subsidy but the end of the chain did not see the benefit, which means that people could not touch it properly and be able to benefit from it. the issue of inflation has happened, that is, we have never seen this subsidy in these few years, which is sometimes the minimum amount that they pay and the recipients get money for the subsidy, they have never been able to support themselves with the conditions of mr. mohammadi. four and twenty with 285d do you think this is a one-sentence sentence , i don't want to say 4.200 to the goal that was announced , it was a good basic goal.

they should give support so that in the end the consumer will get the product at a lower price. at first, 420 was given to everyone, then it was given to everyone. there was a problem with the work , it was paid without supervision. look, we talked about the chicken . you said that we are still subsidizing a part of the subsidy from the beginning. we removed the chain and gave it to the end of the chain. we saw the result. the result was that the price went up and the purchasing power increased. people have come down again about the width of four and 2028 and 500 or whatever another preferred option is that if we don't monitor it, we will fail. the example is different now, but for the sake of the mind , carrying weapons is free in america, then shootings in schools have gone higher. instead of banning carrying weapons, the american legislator came and said, "well, what should we do, should the teachers also get guns or not?" give bulletproof vests to all students. these

kinds of suggestions we are making, we suggest instead of correcting from the source, that means we don't want to correct the supervision, accept that our supervision was not correct, our processes and processes were not correct, if it was correct, the result would be good, the best would be 420 if the rules were stricter , it would have a better outcome. it doesn't matter if you go for 28 and 500 with the same method. you will fail at any other price, announce any other rate , you will fail again if you do not monitor the beginning of the chain, if you do not monitor, people will not touch the end of the chain . let's say, well, this is done with the assumption that we say that our supervision is not sufficient and reliable for you, that is, the assumption that because you say the end of the chain and the beginning of the chain, now in each direction , there is an assumption.

that we have initiated our supervision, now it is good to leave this subsidy and the limited resources that we have for the beginning of the chain or leave it for the final consumer, assuming that we also have proper supervision, the beginning of the chain of supervision will have a better result. spend less resources, you will get more results, you just choose the right goods and the layers are a combination of friends. announce now that the current plan of the government, which was announced for eid until eid , is a little better than the previous plans. you can get more subsidies if you buy some goods. use it, even if you can't use that subsidy , use the amount that is paid, do not buy these goods at all.

give a chain. well, since you give the end of the chain, then you don't see the need to create supervision, that means you are not doing your duty . you easily transfer all the pressure to the end of the chain, mr. bestgar. how much do you agree with the assumption of supervision and these ? pointing out that let's direct the resources , that is, in any case, i mentioned the same point, that by giving direct conditional subsidy , that is directing the resources, but the debate is whether until this year , that is, until 1402, have we been able to at the beginning of the chain, that is, in production now we gave a subsidy that is supposed to reach the final consumer at an approved rate. could we have a strict supervision?

can all sections of the society really use this subsidy? we have the same thing in gasoline. anyway, gasoline is a challenge. and you look at subsidies and gasoline smuggling we also have excessive consumption. maybe many people use this gasoline for other supplements . well, this subsidy really reaches the end consumer. can all sections of the society be able to use this subsidy ? be it in any case, we have seen that there has been no management on this issue for several years, which means that it has been really poorly done, so we leave this work and task to the people themselves, with conditions and conditions, so that they can

use this subsidy where they need it, and one question is perhaps more important. in your opinion, which one of these payment methods is the subsidy? closer to justice for the people, see with attention. due to the changing conditions of the country in the economic issue, now we cannot say which method is better. any method that we can have more and better supervision can be more useful for our society, that is, because people are using it. for example, if we are giving to the first of the chain or if we are giving to the end of the chain, we are giving to those who are our target, which of them can use this subsidy more fairly , usually, well, people who are at the end of the job anyway, if they get a direct subsidy. in my opinion, it is closer to justice, mr. mohammad

. there is a basic argument. if we agree on one part , you must also accept the second part. if you want justice, then all goods must be justice. yes, you give the example of gasoline subsidy , why don't you say about insulin, for example , why do we subsidize insulin so that not everyone uses it? it's not logical. you can't , because a certain group of people is given a subsidy, for example, a drug for a specific disease, why should some people use it? why should the rich people use the gasoline subsidy? everyone should use it . it is enough that the subsidy is given to the beginning of the chain it will not reach the goal. we could not monitor it. it has a dangerous delay. if i accept that it has not been successful so far, because it has not been successful, it has been less targeted than our subsidy policies, but the example of the basic discussion

is that we say that the subsidy is not good. he says completely, he says that we should remove the subsidy and free the prices, he does not say that we should do the right thing, this is the example. the basis of the same thing will happen. the proponents of the school and theory of giving subsidies to the end of the chain first say that you should bring the subsidy to the end of the price chain. the goods should be freed, after it is freed , now slowly the subsidy will be removed. the global price of supply and demand means that a dangerous word will be said later that you free the prices. why do we have a preferential rate for smuggling? ? in the meantime, some people will be crushed under this cycle in this process. here is the dangerous word. at the cost of being crushed , there are some people in the society who want to make some reforms. we cannot make reforms that some people

will be crushed under the wheel of development, under these reforms . we must pay attention to these as well. if complete consider this package. yes , we agree that you should free all these prices, supply and demand , do not give any subsidy, it is justice, but the one who finds and consumes, the one who did not have will be crushed under this cycle. it is a debate and there is a time . it has created confidence among the people , which means that, well, in the past years, this was the case

it came to pass that we give the subsidy to the people to manage by themselves, all sections of our society receive subsidies after a while. stopping the subsidy coming to one part, saying that you are entitled to it except for the shops, for example, after a period of time, a condition will come , that is, with the coming and going of different governments , different parliaments, changing these methods. well, this shows that it is really a real goal. regarding this issue or a real behavior that people can be sure of, there is no way and method, wherever we are now, my interpretation is that if we give at the beginning of the chain, who are the beginning of the chain, that is, it is supposed to be who will get this subsidy?

it comes to our mind that another governmental event is going to happen , which means that the government will come in as the custodian of the issue or the administrator of the issue. now , i will tell you about the basic goods, because these basic goods are mainly government goods, which means that the government has the main role to do it now. this did not answer, but from this. on the other hand, we saw that the coming of subsidies to the people , freeing the prices , and then for a while, the same subsidies that were given to the people and removing them from a number of communities. people can we should make sure that this did not happen . the point that mr. mohammadi mentioned about the fact that some people may be injured in this process that you are referring to . the low income of your society , to what extent do you agree with this statement

? yes, definitely, anyway, in this trial and error, some people will definitely be harmed. no, they meant the part that we said to give to the end of the chain. you hit the gas, the statement you mentioned, well, of course, i can't confirm this absolutely, but anyway, relatively. this is also true, mr. mohammadi, thank you. it should be noted that giving subsidies to the beginning of the chain is absolutely not a permission and approval for the government to do this directly , because it does not have a good result and it cannot give subsidies to the beginning of the chain , rather than the government itself, for example, establishing a poultry farm. do the work yourself , don't be an administrator, the government allocates subsidies, supervises, supervision is the duty of the government , supervision is the dignity of the government. it should be done, not taking over and competing with the private sector or competing with

the producer. this should not happen, but it should it should be supervised. well, here is the mandate of my supervision. wherever the government comes to ask for a subsidy, it means that it will help. my supervision has also come in, and there is also the mandate of the goods , so this is the second part of our issue. it should be one of the monitoring tools for determining the price. what should the government order to the detriment of the producer? no, the order to set a reasonable profit rate for various goods. when you get 100 units of subsidy, you can also imagine a percentage profit for you . you should not sell more than this. do more harm than this or people will not be the target don't let the gangs , don't touch the people, you should give subsidies and the people will get more than the allowed limit. well , this pricing is also one of the government's shenanigans, which

should be monitored so as not to put more pressure on the people, that is, exactly when the subsidy goes to everyone. now, first of all, the government should have supervision , i am not against this, i say that when the government comes to spend money, it gives me the right to interfere, no , we mean this particular government, and in general, well, we have been wanting the so-called productions and economic discussions for a while now with the government becoming a government. let's move on. well, it is definitely a discussion. there is a time. we want to be in the so-called section private means based on the article 44 of the constitution , the issue is that the deprived and lower class of the society can use public resources. in my opinion, i mean in my opinion, when i say the private sector, mainly with the presence and entry

of devices that are now imported from various government sectors , we have not seen good results in the past few years. now if if this subsidy is given to that producer at the beginning of the chain, the government will definitely say that, sir, i am paying here, and i must have supervision. my opinion is that now more than a third of the country's income is spent on subsidies. has the government succeeded in monitor it. has the government been successful in reaching the lower classes of society ? it seems that we have not been successful. basically, how much do you think it is possible to monitor this volume of production? for example, in my opinion, they cannot have much success.

but the amount of work is very high. in any case, this issue is a national issue and an issue that, due to the dispersion of different strata of our society, if we want all strata of society to be able to benefit, it seems to me that it should be a completely private work, that is, be it the private sector or the public, mr. mohammadi, this discussion is that one-third of the government's income is spent on paying subsidies in various ways. which is not monitored and we don't get enough benefits. it is different from whether the people are in half welfare or not. we have to compare it like this. our country gives the most subsidies in some sectors, but the welfare of the society is also provided. you can compare this. compare this with the countries that say if you don't have money for electricity and i don't know, we will cut off your heating

. the subject may seem very normal to us, but keeping the house warm has become a concern in many countries, even industrialized countries , there is no compliment, there is no exaggeration . to announce on this platform , i don't expect everyone to agree to go and study by themselves . is keeping a house a concern in the industrialized countries of the world or not? why is it not a concern in our country? because of the subsidy that is given. are we using the subsidy correctly? no we do not use correctly. there is no good supervision. but it is not a reason that we do not have prosperity. the health facilities that we have may

be very natural and our inalienable rights. in many countries. does not exist. you have to make an appointment for several months for an mri or ct scan appointment in a country like england. this does not happen in our country. in most of the two villages, access to health and the health network in the best way is possible. if you don't pay this fee, you have to pay other consequences. we have this in different departments. for example, they say that our government is very big and extensive. yes. if you have education too. privatize the size of the government it will be smaller. instead of three or four million teachers who are government employees, this is with the companies , the plan to appoint direct government employees will show the size of the government will be smaller. will our problem be solved? do we agree to implement this model? we don't agree, it will be better than this , we can implement it better than this, it is more difficult, but

monitoring does not mean that there is a supervisor for each trade unit. effective monitoring is not limited to traditional monitoring , we can have more effective monitoring with other methods and new tools. we say that the country will be run at a high cost anyway, and anyway, it's a matter of targeting friends. in matters such as treatment or the gas consumption that you mentioned, these are the examples. we deny that subsidies should be given in those sectors that should definitely be done by the government. the basic thing that people are going to get

, is this the first subsidy? it is given to the producer at the end of the chain to understand this , which means that he was really able to make an impact. has it reached the real meaning of the hand of the final consumer? i i mean, until today, most of the goods that people consume are not of the quality and size that they should be. well, the reason for this is that the government gave the subsidy at the beginning of the chain, that is, at the beginning of the work. anyway, it is a big cost for the government, the amount when we say 1/3 of the government's income is about 100%, well, this is a significant amount . let's see it at the end. let's see if it has positive effects. if it has, let's continue . it doesn't seem like bakr, mr. mohammadi, let's have two minutes of your speech. the government is not a good businessman

. it has not been able to provide the services it provides to the people. show the real shape, yes , we agree, but it can be corrected that people don't touch it, because the famous example is that a fish in the sea doesn't feel the water and it doesn't feel the presence of water when it goes out. write the real finished product and mention that you are buying at a subsidized price. maybe people will feel better and more realistic about the subsidies they receive, although not in the way that is customary in some stores now , which is a price increase. let's say, for example , we also gave a 70% discount for a mentee. more than the price we have finished giving it to the people, no, not like this, but people can feel that it should be better explained to them, but if

we cut the subsidy from the beginning of the chain, we will give it to the end of the chain, and then after a while, we will say, well, it has not worked, its sources. we can't provide for it, so let's remove it. this is double cruelty to the people . it's a dangerous introduction. these words, for example, are a famous example of a student telling you to say a. then the teacher beats him and says, say a. they say it's simple, he says a. i said that i have to tell each other to end it when you withdraw the subsidy calculate at the beginning of the chain, give it to the end of the chain , the next step is to create competition , the next step is to realize the prices , and to put it simply, dollarize everything. take everything based on inflation , to justify the fact that it is not cost-effective. my opinion

about yaran is that, in any case , there is support for the disadvantaged and weak in all countries of the world. the way of support depends on the economic conditions of that country. during these several years, our country found out that this type of subsidy payment could not be efficient, but the direct subsidy payment that it is common in many countries, if it is conditional , it can definitely be useful. i would like to ask that, in any case , considering that we have elections ahead , the honorable representatives must pay attention to any law that can empower the weak members of our society. it makes people have more hope in life, the dreams

they have, anyway, we all know that our people are serving the country with their heart and soul in all the scenes . certainly, this period too, god willing, we hope that the people will express themselves by voting and voting. vote and help , god willing, representatives who are experts they are committed to appear in the islamic council, god willing. thank you very much, mr. rostgar, mr. mohammadi , all the good viewers of the higher program, who accompanied us until this moment . naturally, this can be helpful and effective in your decision for the representatives you vote for. this question has also been asked of the candidates for this term of the islamic council elections. you can apply it and make your decision. take it, thank you very much for your companion, may god protect you, higher than both or

higher today, wherever we are, we will be higher tomorrow. farmers' cheese.

milk, cocoa, ranchers, yogurt, khosh kharzaze, ranchers, fresh milk, ranchers , from the roof of dadan to the shalgamhan with ranchers, children , let 's go to the city of household goods. 35. millions of tomans buy a vacuum cleaner , they give a gift, yes, let's gather, let's go and sweep the gifts.

we bought a first-class baklava , you, i said, "go to my place. besides my refrigerator, we also bought gas and iron for the house, a bed and a mattress, a sofa, a carpet , a broom and an oven to complete the dowry of the happy wedding, which , god willing, will be sold in installments for retirees in one month. social without check and guarantor , without advance payment, without going to the bank, in the large

iranian house in the cities of qom wesfahan and tehran until 2:00 am in the city of tehran, i am your host. hello , dear viewers of phil majlis program. he said what are you doing? he said that i am making slogans for merchants. assembly in the world means lobby. but the lobby there is a rule of the game. in the middle of hashemi's work, brake badly . were you not threatened in the seventh round because of whether you vote or not? you are there, you are there , and i am also there. i wasn't a party person and i wasn't into these kinds of issues. phil majlis the ups and downs of the 11th parliamentary term in a conversation with former representatives. every day at 19.3 from khabar network.

in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. hello, dear viewers . good evening, your news. you are watching at 16:00, the amount of gas consumption in the domestic and commercial sectors reached 600 million cubic meters last day, according to the director of the center of the national gas company. it is possible that the amount of gas consumption will reach 680 million cubic meters by the end of the week. to know more details, i will talk with the director of the country's gas network management center, mr. aqli.