the action that israel has taken is a security action and a reaction to iran's behavioral pattern, so even though there was a need to hold an emergency meeting of the united nations security council and even though there was a need for us to be able to file a lawsuit regarding our security and strategic rights. . let's have a fight, but the fact is that the type of issue and defense of the legitimacy of the islamic republic was done in a weak way . with. confrontation

thank you very much, let 's say goodbye to the viewers of the network and listen to your further comments later. if you are interested in watching this conversation , follow it on khabar. we are at your service with tonight's special news interview and the review of international reactions to the assassination of martyr ismail haniyeh. mr. dr. motaghi, you pointed out that there is a weakness, we could not get the necessary benefit from this emergency meeting of your security council , and this is due to that structure. the international system , you know, when the structure of the international system is oppressive, when it is based on strong righteousness , it means oppressive, you and me and the weak countries must

we should improve our diplomatic and strategic capabilities in such a way that it leads to a change in the perception of the security council of the international system and all the representatives in the united nations when the desired result for the condemnation of israel is not achieved by the main actors and the council, meaning it is that both the structure of an overreaching role is in a kind of reductionist way in relation to iran's request , and that we could not have the necessary space and necessary consultation and literature. we need to produce what is necessary in order to

be able to somehow defend a truth and a kind of condemnation. do you believe that it is beyond this? convictions could be 100 incidents, that is , an environment should be created so that if in the future there is a ground for taking revenge actions by any actor and resistance front, in those circumstances, this mentality does not arise that the action that has taken place is of an offensive nature. self-defense is a countermeasure and based on the united nations charter, it is a kind of security challenge for iran in the future from the great powers of the security council.

thank you very much to the united nations, especially its main members and permanent members, mr. zahroon , after the supreme leader of the revolution promised this. that appropriate action will be taken against the bloodthirsty of the guest of the islamic republic of iran. today, mr. nasrallah again gave this prophecy that whoever is behind this incident is the enemy and those who are his supporters will definitely be waiting for this reaction. what is your prediction about this reaction ? what kind of reaction do you think the resistance front will have to this action, which will be both a deterrent and , in a way, he can't think of his words now to create the necessary deterrent and effect. it's good, it's effective, yes , in the name of god, i apologize for your presence we are faced with the efforts

that are being made in order for america to maintain its past relations under the title of aggression and domination, and on the other side , influencing powers such as russia, china and iran as a decisive actor in we have a region , in fact, we take a part and role in the new formulation , and in general, the area of ​​resistance, the impact of this formulation

is very , very environmental. to prevent the massacre of people in gaza, this is a problem in itself the court of justice comes to the hague and confirms both the issue of nasr killing and the issue of mr. netanyahu and gallant being criminals, but the americans easily ignore the issue or mr. netanyahu goes to washington. and during the time that he is speaking , on average, every minute, a large part of the congressmen are not cheering him, and this is while people are standing outside the congress and they are demonstrating the american flag. they set themselves on fire, which basically means

they are placed in a different paradigm, and they are completely unable and unwilling to accept the changes in accept the international environment. there is a structure , it is created in the gap, but the decision-making arena is inside the congress itself. it is true that there is a field in the outer space for protest to be created. it is true that for the first time, 125 members of the american congress from the house of representatives and the senate did not attend this meeting. and it is true that biden

did not allow him in the space related to the rings of the white house during the process of receiving netanyahu, but there is a fact , the fact is that 30 billion dollars. in the last year , the americans provided military aid to israel. the second point is the security environment that has been created the region will not continue without the support of america, britain, and france. the debate that exists is that my point of view is the same as a series of countries, a series of people, and a series of groups cannot spread the wave of resistance in connection with the genocide in gaza. and the international court of justice issued resolutions in this regard, why can't we

defend the truth in a way that we have requested an extraordinary meeting. let's give data and shape the mental atmosphere of the security council in a way that it can be influenced by you, mr. the atmosphere of the security council, in my opinion, is especially divided in relation to this two-year war in ukraine and more specifically in the gaza strip, which is actually a disaster and this has been lost. which is inside the security council, iran, russia, china as a valid threat from the united states, nato is pointing fingers and it is recognized that two of the three main pillars that are permanent members are now facing each other and

the chinese troops are now in belarus they are maneuvering and preparing for the discussion of the possibility that the third world war will happen. this side you look at it from one side, we are coming from the other side . it has been 10 months since the 360 ​​km gaza scene was cut off by america, england, germany. bringing money and even soldiers into the scene to suppress a nation that demands its rights, in such an environment , resorting or hoping to the internal environment of the security council will definitely remain unanswered . resisting this, now that you have interviewed from the field, we should not distance ourselves from our discussion.

my prediction was and is that, anyway, we have the best atmosphere now, firstly, until martyrdom dear mr. haniyeh , there is still a type of removal of power and decision-making in america, now there is no special will on the part of trump, who is preparing himself, mr. biden, who until 10 days ago, a week ago, said he was still there. mrs. kamel harris has come and in 100 days, 90 days, the elections will officially start in another day. this is a space itself . the next point is that mr. netanyahu, who stood for 10 months and wanted to remove hamas from the scene , decided to take the hostages. frees him and gave a negative answer to all diplomatic advice and efforts, etc. this is one point in fact, mr. netanyahu has failed in the three axes that he had set for the operation in gaza. in fact

, when he went to the united states , he was met with a wave of protests, and the congressman that mr. doctor pointed out refused to attend the congress. words mean avoiding sitting at the feet of mr. netanyahu's speaker . we have never seen the american society so bipolar, and at this point , this bipolarity and this gap has been created within the structure, this was one point and the events that happened, so now a discussion that is very it was serious that the region was going to enter into a serious conflict and i was worried about the issue of hizbullah entering into a direct conflict and the fronts that are now ready on both sides, i believe this is to keep iran passive and mr. netanyahu himself said

that i should i will wait to see what the outcome of the election will be, because mr. biden insisted on his five-six-point plan to somehow reach peace with hamas, but he did not accept this either and went to see if he could buy time, and in other words, continue your failed policy, maybe trump will come, maybe the situation let it change and we will see one hezbollah base and the martyrdom of an iranian adviser and mr. fouad shokar. this is one point. at the same time , there is an american operation by air to hashd al-shaabi bases and a few hours later this crossing of the red line. accepted internationally as well as iran's sovereignty. violation of iran's sovereignty in the martyrdom of mr. haniyeh, in the context of an

international conference in iran. more than 80 countries were present in iran. their various officials were 7 international organizations. in fact, dozens of institutions and non-governmental organizations are here. being reporters being and it was a very stupid thing to buy with the aim of making iran passive. this happened at the time, and later we saw that the americans are now trying hard, the europeans are trying to represent mr. mere, and in other words , mr. joseph burrell's deputy in tehran is trying to come and calm the situation. let's keep it, perhaps there are some internal currents that are playing the drum of peace, this shows that there is a scenario in line with what mr. netanyahu wants, that is, buying time now was the best opportunity, and this is also what happened in

in fact, he was confused with the zeal and with the iranian manners of the congregation and all the accepted international norms, and in any case, the relationship that exists now , the common identity that has emerged in the atmosphere of resistance between groups and regions, should actually be a punishment. it should be taken seriously and now all the regions are waiting for this honest promise after the order of hazrat agha, and this is it. according to my criticism, the equations of the zionist regime have been completely messed up by the americans , and the 2 battle fleets of the united states and the united kingdom are now reaching the eastern part of the mediterranean near lebanon, which means that they did not calculate that let the disaster be so bad and make the conditions of the zionist regime worse, mr. doctor, some people

believe that before this, the islamic republic of iran , just like mr. dr. zahrband, pointed out that he wants the sovereignty of the islamic republic of iran, its sovereignty, and its value to be destroyed. the red lines of the islamic republic of iran, the sohnius regime knew that it has now crossed this red line . some believe that this is a trap that they are planning to drag iran into a war . see how much you agree with this analysis. i think so. we must have a tragic accident he talked about it with a real tragic incident. if i say that we have general discussions or slogans , the audience will not listen to our words, nor will it solve any problems for the political system. the first point is that this action and operation

was formed from inside the country. when an action is taken from inside the country. it is true in our opinion. we believe that this action was not initiated by israel or any other actor, and this action was carried out in the framework of a kind of strategic exchange with the american security services. it is true that blinken said that we do not know, the ministry of foreign affairs may not know, but the strategic services and america's intelligence and security forces are naturally both in the knowledge space and agree with this issue, so this action and this attack was formed against a hardcore area of ​​our national security. now the question that exists is

whether when this action done from within the country. how much has this been proven? it means that i have been following up on all the discussions that i have been having for the past two days. neighboring countries have shared the type. doubt the degree of destruction shows that it was used tactically, or as it is known , it was a small anti-particle missile, or that

it was designed to drop the bomb through these birds that have an aggressive action plan, that is, these attack quadcopters. this issue shows that our way of looking at it will be different from the idea that was formed in relation to sadiq's promise, so the type of revenge is also different. of course, we were the hosts. and we had to provide security, now we have to provide security in the situation symmetric name should be done. the problem we have is that we do not feel that we are in an environment of intense strategic threats. the situation that took place in syria, where five or six people

were present in a building. of advisers. iranians, this situation is in the so-called security space, and its settlement and environment should not be located in the official space , or if it wants to settle somewhere, it should change direction at the last moment, that is, we are having a discussion called protection. personal protection mr. haniyeh himself, that being with them means coming with them and entering the country from their side it has not been observed, we cannot make this claim, the debate that exists is that

he is responsible for our protection, who should create a path for that, or in other words , they should be placed in an interactive action space, that is, just as there is a context. that diplomatic protocols must be set, security protocols and protection protocols must be achieved. there are two approaches. so what we should pay attention to is what to do. the main issue is that in this space, where no detailed explanation has been provided after this incident, it means approx. for example, 40 and maybe four five hours have passed, but we don't have any detailed strategic interpretation in this regard, and

it is natural that if a missile was fired or an airplane entered, it is natural that our defense would have encountered and countered, or at least recorded the first point that we have. this is that when we say the protection of the personality, it is the personality that is in the space of israel's subjectivity, and that too in a situation that we have in a situation related to a ceremony, for example, a celebration, when the representatives of many countries enter our country, and we must create this feeling of security. in that situation. we have to put more effort into the formation

in terms of protocols, in terms of the principles to be observed, we have a way to go, in fact, in my opinion, we have gone to the sidelines it is true that the assassination happened, i accept the responsibility. and it is clear what has happened , now it wants to be from outside the border, it wants to be from the sky, no one accepted, why did the israelis themselves accept, while it is clear that you went and shot and hit the place where mr. haniyeh and his bodyguard were there, now we have this. to want let's go to the question that we say that we want to check the protection management. let's see why and why it was weak and strong, how did it happen and who is to blame for it is a separate discussion. the discussion is that israel intervened in this matter and came and carried out an assassination

. this is not acceptable for us . he rejects diplomatic actions. our adviser, who has a diplomatic position, has diplomatic responsibilities, and contrary to accepted international conventions, he does the same thing that he has done in lebanon , and actually assassinated the main commander of hezbollah. and this assassination, which is very clear, this incident must be dealt with now because it is a violation of sovereignty , it is a violation of international conventions and laws , it is not acceptable at all that someone dares to do such a wrong, and it is from this angle that it is definitely it should be dealt with. these words from mr. d came from outside, from the sky , from i don't know, from the earth. some people say that this is a trap that wants to bring iran into a conflict. not you, it's not like that at all.

look, we are in a conflict now. we are in a trap. you can see now. we stood for 10 months with iran as an axis the yemeni resistance supported , compare 10 months ago with today, didn't the americans come and the whole operation, the lack of the fleet , shows the growth of the resistance. 2 years ago , no one would have imagined that anyone could stand in front of israel and put pressure on it. look at how now, for 10 months , hizbullah has been standing still, and the northern areas of israel have been completely empty, and this shows that the resistance has grown and we and if the resistance is key component. let's accept it in our geopolitical situation let's face it, so the interests of our national security are being defined in this scene, but at some point you want to separate the field from diplomacy.

define, like what they said during the period of mr. rouhani, that diplomacy became a victim of the field , accept this extension, so yes , it will be the level of analysis that the resistance will go its own way. no, the issue of our collective security is the issue of preserving the integrity of the geopolitical survival of the region . the issue is that they have come to change the equations to our detriment and to the detriment of the region. implied that as a regional and even global superpower , due to the high soft capacity we have and the world is publicizing this, we must look at it from this angle. let's see a region later, so it's time we have to go to the same diplomacy of the past , creating a balance between the east and the west, and actually , we will be in the same situation as we were in 1320

, and we are here too. after all, we are just trying to protect ourselves. in the meantime, no, we are an actor, we are a power in the new formulation we stood for 45 years and today we are getting the result and this result must be strongly explained to us and to our opposite side that america must be my country, not only israel. let's talk with them. thank you very much. now, the tips, sir. it happened in tehran and the various dimensions of those points are the personal opinion of mr. mottaghist, which is raised in this program, and we cannot comment on his rejection or approval, because we have to do expert work on it anyway. relevant experts should comment, but mr. dr. motaghi, your excellency, thinks how

open the islamic republic of iran's hands are now in terms of international law systems. give me the full answer so that he can seek bloodshed. i will explain that it is completely my personal opinion. i am not a member of parliament like mr. zahrovand, nor do i have executive responsibility, nor do i have confidential information. in my opinion , i remember saeed's words mainly outside the order of my poetry. i'm kind of scared , iraqi foreign minister, look, we have a discussion the incident that took place is a tragic incident that has created a security challenge for us. we must know that first of all, what is the situation we are in. as an expert, as a teacher, i have one minute , yes, as a person who is following up on the discussions

. i didn't understand that israel accepted the responsibility for this action. is israel a fool? is israel carrying out a special operation? is it a fool to want to put himself under threat, that we should take countermeasures, that what he the supreme leader in connection with the need to deal with the threat and bloodlust of a party which is a symbol of resistance must be done, it is a serious discussion, but one thing that exists is that we, as the islamic republic, are a political system with all its structural formations, what should we do to have lower costs? the part that can bring that regret to us in less than a minute

, mr. well, if i have access to information , maybe the result will be this analysis, and if we want to evaluate only based on external information, well, mr. doctor, as a professor. the university and the analyst have this point of view and this is us now, the gap is actually analytical, we have a point of view regarding the issue that has actually threatened our national security today, and we should deal with it at the level of necessary deterrence, just like the way we had in the honest promise . god willing,

thank you very much, mr. dr. zahrund, mr. dr. motaghi , thank you for watching, have a good night. in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the world today in the first file of tonight's program. on the occasion of the 300th day of the gaza war, what happened and what is to come with mr. dr. faad izadi we will investigate in the second case , we will go to lebanon to have an analysis of the content of

today's speech by seyyed hassan nasrallah, secretary general of hezbollah in lebanon .