there is also a positive thing that happened in these 3 years . mr. hosseini, the government punishment organization, as the authority for dealing with the violations of goods smuggling, and i am sure , he has an important responsibility in this area. since we started working , we have made nearly 23% progress in terms of designing and designing systems related to the field of smuggling, which is the duty of the law. he was and he was a follower of hazrat agha. now we have done 100% of our task . the main smugglers are not caught in the program you have and most of the cases are filed for the retailers

. do you agree? look at this. it was created and unfortunately , the procedures of poetry and punishments have also been implemented. for example, according to the legal regulations , it is not a crime or violation to take goods out of border provinces for personal consumption or for a case, but we were faced with cases that people for personal consumption for use. personal departure of the province well, there are waiting in the border cities or border provinces, goods under the name of malvani tehlini kolhori are coming. well, some people now go there because the price is cheap or something else, or they go for fun or travel, so i have to return it for their personal consumption, not for business. i mean, for personal use , they buy a product with themselves, well, detectives or law enforcement officers discover it on the way , and bring it as contraband, and let me tell you that it

has its own punishments and hardships from these issues. this is what happened in the government stoning organization we came and entered into this issue, a legal review was done, many discussions and legal meetings were held . finally, we corrected this procedure, that is , we informed our branches that, sir, in the position of handling between those goods that enter and leave the so-called border provinces for the purpose of trade. and enters the central area with that work. the wrong procedures that existed in the past and we corrected it as a wrong process was that hosseini, we

have an interpretation of article 18 in the law, the interpretation of article 18 refers to goods subject to export smuggling, that is, goods that are now either domestically produced or imported. but it is a subsidy and it has the potential capacity and possibility of smuggling abroad, such as powdered milk, gasoline, flour, and since then during the investigations we had in these cases or referrals. that the people have told us that unfortunately, in the implementation position , some explorers and explorers, or so-called officers of the development of the scope of note 4 of article 18 , show themselves where the effect is, mr. hosseini's effect shows itself there, that some of our production units in as a result of this wrong look , a case of smuggling was filed against them and they were charged with serious crimes. to judge, for example

the home appliance company has produced its home appliance products and put them in its warehouse. it has not yet had a chance to register in the system . the law itself says that goods that do not comply with the rules set by the government regarding goods that are subject to smuggling , it does not matter if they are domestic or foreign production, are not goods that are potentially subject to export smuggling. ok , there is no problem with domestic production as well. how is it considered to be smuggling? see, it may be a subsidy, gasoline

or gasoil, because it has a conflicting border and there is a difference. there is a price, well, it is potentially possible and has the capacity of smuggling, to mention that, for example, a producer in a production complex. he has been involved in such a case. yes , for example, in which product and which manufacturer did this situation arise? my point was this, mr. hosseini. look, the legislator comes and says that non-compliance with the specified criteria regarding the goods subject to smuggling , such as pharmaceutical products and petroleum products, is included. the interpretation of article 18 becomes 18, and i am considered to be a domestic producer. how does he fall under this law? it means that he finds the conditions for smuggling and is producing inside the issue of domestic or foreign production is not relevant, the issue is what you think is potentially possible for smuggling, and the government's legislation

has set rules for that product in order to prevent it from being smuggled. 18 as an example, i will tell you what to do so that this did not happen. what are the rules we have to follow ? let me give you a specific example: milk powder or medicine , is it imported, or it may be domestically produced ? he sells or explains that he has to follow the rules, including registration in the system, for example t-tech , so his business is registered, it's a joke.

which allows you to do it in the execution stage, in the execution stage it is basically assumed that the convicted person may not be able to pay the fine and due to the inability to pay the fine in exchange for the fine, the convicted person may have to go to jail, or maybe some of them . then we will come to how much the discount was or

how much, for example, it turned into a prison, because i said that what is usually important to us is the amount of collection, and of course, it is a significant point. it shows the regulation. i said that we are faced with our structure of monitoring the market in its own discussion

, that is, the regulation of the car work, unfortunately , was not done properly. the department rejected it for having other opinions or references, this agent of these issues, unfortunately

, he did not have the right and authority to enter into this matter, and in our opinion, the decision is final, and for this case, well, it was followed up a lot, finally, it was technical and scientific, but in any case the face with the door is considered legal and tehran recently announced that the increase in the door in fact, it has been up to 48, while the law considered an average increase of 25%, the violators in this area

because the new law has been promulgated, and many people may not know that this guarantee of implementation is for them, because in the past years, this was in the form of this was an arbitrary decision, but because there was no guarantee of implementation, the people may be very aware of this. now, i did not check whether there was a complaint or not, but my perception and interpretation is that the people probably do not know about this law, so to speak, this is the second point. now it's not bad, i want to know that dear people, well, we are one of the challenges in the market

we used to have real estate that the rights and burdens of real estate consultants are being complained about and people are dissatisfied. in this resolution and in this new law, the legislator has mandated that real estate consultants must first register all rental contracts in the transaction and real estate registration system, and the second point in your the same provision is provided that the real estate consulting fees and expenses are automatically calculated by the system , and it is stated in the terms and conditions of the lease agreement, and the consultant or the operator of that property is based on the figure that is calculated there through the card store machines connected to the system of the tax organization is that right he receives his salary, and for this reason , our dear people, if you are faced with a situation where that real estate consultant is aware of the violations that

have happened in the same field of housing, rental and buying and selling, and there has been a complaint , a case has been filed, see what the violations were. the most complaints that we had in the field of housing last year were the violations of consultants and real estate companies, especially in terms of the right to receive fees and labor in excess of or more than the legal tariff that i had, and the ways of complaints that you mentioned, we are fully prepared for the 135 system. i don't know how much time we have, hosseini. we about 7 to 8 minutes are allowed. if there is a question , i am at your service. there is a point about the discussion because it has always been our concern. usually, hosseini's idea is that the government's punishment organization is the government's punishment organization . it has the task of dealing with market violations.

it is a confrontational approach, while one of our strategies and the actions we took in the organization in addition to dealing with violations of the market structure, supporting production and producers is one of our basic approaches and programs. mr. hosseini, i told you, the first process that we started as an organization was that we systematized our proceedings and legalized them, just like what happened in the discussion of the interpretation of article 18. well, in order to support production was an important point that i have to tell you, mr. hosseini. we are supporters and supporters of fair producers

. also, mr. hosseini is in line the same approach happened. it happened that last year we in the organization of the government attack made the implementation camp and the slogan of the year. we came to this camp and sat down with ourselves. we came to the enforcement cases of manufacturing companies that have committed violations, and we brought them to the camp in a manner of using the legal capacities, and we implemented the votes so that there was no disruption in production or creating problems that led to to bankruptcy of the company is it possible that there is no disruption in the production process , and for example, let me give you two very important points. assume a company. now, i don't know the name of the company. the company has been sentenced to a fine of several

tens of billions. well, if we wanted the same fine , then let's run. we used it, we loaned it, we divided it, or discounts or friendships of friendship institutions were applied to it, on the other hand, that company was able to increase its production in response to the privileges we gave it, or sometimes employment was created . that is very important it is about the city of schools, schools and the center. it has been done in the first region for the first to sixth grade. every city receives more than 200 million. for the second grade, it is about 500 million. what is your review

in this regard? basically, the government year no longer has the authority to enter the field of surplus urban photography. the main and direct responsibility and the main trustee is the non-government school organization of varsh, but before this law, we had entry. last year , cases were filed for many of these schools and fines were issued. it is now in phase it is being implemented, but now, with the amendment of the law on the establishment of high-altitude schools, a council is apparently foreseen in that law, and that council itself has the duty to investigate and enter if an urban school has a surplus . another point, well, in the first part when we were talking , you mentioned the plane ticket issue as one of the examples, your excellency, and also the resolution of the court of administrative justice, we can say that it is a chaotic market and

you know hosseini . justice administrative and non-entry of the council our interpretation of this issue is that the competition council should enter, and we ourselves are critical of this kind of interaction and policy that the government has towards this situation. airlines should not use subsidies. now they are taking subsidized services from it . they are claiming that we are free and subject to these issues, which means that they will not be formed and nurtured . shmol released pricing because what happened was that the court of justice came to the decision of the market regulation headquarters, which required ticket pricing, and that was a tool for us to deal with . well, it overturned this, now

there is no legal price and definition, because our decision is based on the fact that pricing takes place, that is, the law. there should be a change in it, the law must be amended , we can also say that in the current situation, maybe with an interpretation , now we have this from a legal point of view. well, because there is a lot of material, there is no place to discuss it now. we have our own legal views in detail. we announced to the competition council and to the support organization that we believe in the current situation, we can use the legal capacities and the government should step in and regulate the market, but, friends, i don't know for any reason now, but mr. hosseini , let me tell you one thing. in the area of ​​market violations , many people or officials think that there must be an order price.