these things that we are talking about, for example , sedition and the like , have not been answered because they are not in the law, and maybe there is a need, because the leadership of 2017 stressed that these inquiries must be done, maybe there is a problem with the parliament, where this law we should have corrected it so that this is done completely. now it is not possible to take it to the ministry of information and they should do their work accurately. it was said in the media that it was published in cyberspace, and some of our colleagues in the parliament said that yes, ministers, the list has been sent to the leadership, their approval is not really like that. look, it was said today in the parliament, the honorable speaker of the parliament also said that these points that are being said are not a negation of the right of the parliament, and it is not like they can really make a list and say it. if this is the case , then the parliament should not actually do anything that what was in the records was also in all the governments.

three cases of the ministry of home affairs, which according to article 110 of the constitution are within the scope of the leadership's powers, are actually the macro-politics of the system in the field of defense and security, which are the ministers of foreign affairs, intelligence and defense. these presidents always announced their options, in fact, if there was a negative point , it was pointed out that these are not compatible with general policies, for example, but the leadership of the command that this minister should be or that minister should be, was definitely not like this. they said publicly. that the parliament should determine these things, it is the right of the parliament to express it, and if it is a point, they will say it publicly , and that now some people are sending a message of regret, this is definitely not true. there is no past, no currents at all it doesn't matter because it is the macro policies of the system and it is part of the discussion of the 110th constitution . a person consults himself, introduces himself

, the assembly votes or does not vote, no , it is not the right of the assembly, no, god forbid, in fact, something should happen that we cannot answer the issue of whether the assembly did its job correctly, the president did his job correctly, everyone should be responsible. let's accept our own work according to the constitution, be it parliament members , president or ministers who are introduced, it is very good my short answer, mr. ali, please tell me about the question that i asked mr. sabakian, which is one of the criticisms raised. the proposed ministry for the presence of political and criminal figures in non-political ministries is brief. please see that we do not have a non-political home ministry at all. the position of a minister in the islamic republic, not only in iran, in all countries, the position of a minister is a political position. now, article 71 of the civil service law he says that these positions are the political positions of the country's political officials, ministers , parliamentarians, vice presidents, governors, this political position means if a servant, for example, the president my hospital is specialized, now they may

have a political point of view, there may even be some problems with that political point of view according to the standards of the islamic republic. and there is a false limit, all ministers must be political, not in the sense that they should be political , they should act politically, that is , they should believe in the principles of the system's macro-policies and the general goals that the leadership draws. . believers in the basics the islamic republic is political, it means knowing what the policies are and acting based on them. if a minister does not really understand any policy , he is not worthy of the ministry. if he has previously taken a position against the policy , he cannot do anything else here . in my opinion, this is a it is a fallacy to say, for example, that a non-political minister, all ministers are political, that is, the position of the ministry, its sovereignty is political at all, these vice presidents, ministers, governors , members of parliament, a representative, i am not political.

it must be political in the general sense, yes, we shouldn't be political, i don't know, we shouldn't abuse, for example let's do it from our position, god forbid, ranti, nothing like this should happen. very well, mr. sabakian, regarding the implementation of the seventh plan, which is the main responsibility of the proposed ministers, who are responsible for the various parts of the plan, to implement them in the form of an operational plan. earlier , mr. shariati mentioned that it is necessary to provide a timetable in addition to the operational plan , how and in what time frame they want to complete this plan and the goal mentioned in the seventh plan. be sure to see each now, the plans of the ministers are written in accordance with the 7th development plan, and it has an annual cut, and as i said, the time frame has been specified. now, as far as we have seen and examined the past, i

think there is no special problem in this field, as i said. by the way, because the path and tasks of the ministers are exactly according to the plan. become a person it is not a special problem. in the field that was discussed in the parliament. i think , alhamdulillah, there is a very good rationality in the ruling parliament, and everyone noticed that he really wants to work and he is compassionate and one hundred, considering the behavior of mr. and the actions of the doctors. it will not be a problem in the parliament and the statistics that can be registered will not be a problem to agree much more than to disagree, god willing.

another point that mr. sabakian has raised and it has been mentioned in the public arena of the media , as well as sometimes your colleagues in the parliament as opponents of the ministers as a whole. there was also the issue of record and performance and records that sometimes some of the ministers' proposed management records and plans are not as they should be and maybe not in accordance with the goals of the 7th plan and general policies, and the approaches are not such that they can implement the 7th plan and general policy according to the history and performance that they have to implement, well, look at it time to oppose each. someone puts forward his own point of view , but the generality that we have seen in these programs are all the programs that the ministers give in line with the operationalization of the 7th development program. i

repeat this point . in the past governments, we had all the slogans now. all the words and opinions of the president of the 7th plan of the ministers' plans have been compiled exactly in this direction, while there are many parts of the ministers' plans in the program itself , please read the 7th plan of toos now . it is 27 pages, 275 pages has approximately 120 articles. it has 24 chapters, when we study this , it has come exactly, it has also put a measure with statistics and percentage, it has specified different programs in two different fields . one of the strong points of this government is the emphasis

on this program, not me. my question was that the criticism that has been raised is that the records of those people are not such that they can implement this program , which is raised as opposition. in general, if we want to have a judgment in general , in general, the people who came have experience there are people who came, anyway , they were approved by the strategic council, which came from different opinions and experts, and they were chosen by mr. shariti, one of the main demands of the people, according to surveys and surveys. the solution to the economic and livelihood problems has been done. well, in the speeches of the honorable president in the parliament , he declared the economy as the main priority of the 14th government

. now they talked about the number of ministers and vote of confidence and lack of confidence and these are the facts. if a minister does not vote, nothing special has happened there has been a history before, the parliament has the right, we said that in a parliament that was aligned with the government , four ministers did not vote, or one minister from a ministry was nominated 4 times to vote, because the parliament had a specific taste and this is my parliament. he will stand by his taste, and as a rule, care should be taken that he was introduced to the ministry of education twice in the government of shahid raisi. he didn't vote, he voted for the third person, so it's not a difficult thing to happen, we hope that the least that happens like this is , well, it's not a complicated thing . you should see the point that you said in the economic field, especially in our period.

in his reform government, the head of the government came to the conclusion that the economic ministries, the planning organization, and the central bank do not have the same family , they have different economic views. anyway, in the world , economic views are based on the number of economists. in the government, there are thirty and trial and error. and it is not a mistake to have a point of view though. the ministry of mining industry and trade, which has many areas at its disposal, they must follow the same economic point of view and approach . it cannot be on the left side of the economy. if someone wants to act in the most right economic area, they will have problems with each other, of course, me. i asked mr. hemti, who came to our commission, said that i am the economic commander of mr. tayyab's government, i need you, and in any case, if this is determined and someone

takes responsibility in this area, it is good. seventh, now, because i emphasize that the seventh plan is important, and by the way, the government should mention that it wants to implement the plan, but how and where, which one has priority, maybe some people will say, i want to start this in the third year. for example, some of them said in the program in some places which year to start it's not like this, but say, for example, now my priority is to explain the subsidies in a fair way. from the second year, i will go to, for example, other policies. this should be determined by the government itself, the ministry of economy should determine it, the economic commander should determine it, and i think that if the government goes for the time being , put aside those things that are the daily needs of the society, for example, in the field of helpers, towards quick-yielding programs, i.e., structural reforms. such energy is in the field of reforming the banking system in the sense

of not its structure, in the sense of ways to save people, for example, in the field of housing, especially in the field of cars, i think these three areas are housing, cars , and the areas of people's livelihood and basic goods. if the government puts these three as the focus and prioritizes them and clearly says what it plans for them , now of course the ministers are still going to do things in this area. in the field of subsidies, the minister of oil remains in the field of electricity, the minister of energy remains in the field of subsidies and in the field of industry. the parliament will really help the government in this field if it goes according to the 7th plan and specify exactly what you want to do . we are in the lower part of the program and each of the dignitaries less than a minute they have the opportunity to express their final point and conclusion , mr. sabakian, we are in the service of assali. it has been around 50 years

in the case of the parliament. i opposed the registration, but i said in general , just as mr. sharideh said, the economic complex of the government is almost from the same complex, alhamdulillah, and this will reduce the problems for the command now, the economy that mr. tibiya said and in relation to the issues that are being emphasized now that i just presented that operational plan is clear, that is , i want to say that we must produce 129 million liters of gasoline per day, or the assumption, for example, in the field of roads, this amount should be i hope that the set of topics that

are being discussed in the parliament is also informative , because the oppositions are experts, the agreements are experts , even where seemingly political topics are raised , the fundamental topics of the system and the islamic republic are set aside, and it is really happening, thank you very much. from actually political pressures some of the tyranny of the political currents will dominate your cabinet. you just give a number. how many percent of the ministers will get votes? i have already said my prediction that between 3 and 5 people are at risk. god willing, there will not be any special problem and the government will be realized in the form given, but

in any case, the power lies with the parliament, which is in any way. god bless you and be happy. in the name of allah, the most merciful, in the name of god who remembers rest in peace, dear viewers , hello to the world. welcome to the world today. i am vahid modareszadeh.

i will be with you by reviewing the most important news and developments in the world. the united nations security council. emphasizing the necessity of stopping the zionist regime's attacks on gaza, mr. kanani said: iran welcomes every sincere effort to end the crime and establish a ceasefire. but the american government does not consider it as a competent government to follow the ceasefire. spokesman of the ministry of foreign affairs he said: the issue of stopping attacks on gaza is a global demand, and this issue has nothing to do with iran's legitimate and legal right to punish the aggressor. the spokesperson of the ministry of foreign affairs said: request for restraint from iran

, while the zionist usurper regime threatens regional peace and security. the request is illogical and iran's response to the aggressive action of the zionist regime is an inherent and legitimate right. regarding this issue and the latest developments in gaza , we are at the service of dr. ebrahim motaghi, a professor at tehran university who is with us from shiraz. are mr. dr. motaghi. hello to you tehran after the assassination martyr hariyeh immediately sent his negotiator group for ceasefire negotiations. in your opinion , was this action a premeditated action to prevent iran's revenge under the excuse of a ceasefire ? yes, in the name of allah, the merciful. i am in the service of

his excellency mr. modares and all your dear viewers. the fact is that israel has put the environment of the middle east and southwest asia in a crisis with its aggressive policies. large-scale actions and operations, terror, unusual actions are considered as the main features of israel's operational action. action that israel what he has done, whether in connection with the people of gaza or in connection with the assassination of ismail hamieh in tehran , he will naturally have an appropriate and relevant response, and the main discussion of the resistance

will be the issue of revenge, but there is another point that should be related. he knew about the difference between the policies of america and israel in relation to the regional crisis. the israelis are trying to spread the crisis. intensify the separate atmosphere of war and violence in the regional environment. but the americans are aware of this. there are that if the violence spreads in that situation, the american forces and also some others the regional countries will be involved in the environmental crisis . in this situation, the main debate that exists is that the initiative of the united states as a permanent member of the

security council, which has vetoed the security council's efforts to build peace in the regional environment in many cases in the past, this time to this conclusion has been reached that it is in a deep space or that a peace process should be formed to create a kind of healing for the pervasive pain of the palestinian nation. or to be placed in the atmosphere of intense war in the future. this is where america, as a major world power, has a structural position in the un security council it has taken advantage of the initiatives that

were formed before, it has benefited from encouraging policies and exerting pressure in relation to israel, and they are trying to reach a kind of tacit agreement in relation to the issue of the continuation of israel's violent policies. israel has not yet responded to hamas's request to stop the war. the next point is that if there was a conflict or mr. doctor, i apologize for interrupting the orders of his highness. we are with you. we have another guest, mr. hadi al-qubaisi. an analyst of west asian issues in a video with us

they are together, we are waiting for our communication to be established, mr. dr. motaghi, obviously, my first question is why, immediately after the assassination of ismail haniyeh , the zionist regime brought up the ceasefire talks again and went to him, did he want to reverse the quote, did he want to change his mentality take it to the other side, what do you think is your analysis, why did the zionist regime do this immediately after the assassination? look, the discussion about retaliation is a serious issue, and iran is part of its policy of reciprocation . it is a real thing and iran's strategy in the connection with the assassination and murder of ismail hamila

, the policy of revenge, the policy of revenge is quick and easy, but there is no fuel. let's say it is a discussion that will be appropriate to the strategy, capabilities and priorities of iran and the resistance front. in this situation, i brought up the argument that before israel seeks a cease-fire, the united states should consider the sensitivity of the region's environment. he was aware, and as a result , he can heal the ceasefire process that he knows he put the palestinian people on the agenda, but

just as mr. kanani said, and in my opinion , as a correct analyst , the foreign ministry has drawn attention to the issue of revenge. it will have its place in iran's security strategy and regional policy. very well mr. dr. motaghi, be with us. we are also in contact with mr. hadi al-qubaisi, an analyst of west asian issues. mr. qobaisi, hello to you. my question is specifically for his highness. last night , we raised this issue with mr. alif saqa, who believes that the ceasefire talks are negotiations between the two sides. and diet it is not zionist. these negotiations are negotiations between the zionist regime and the united states. what is his highness's analysis of this matter? benjamin netanyahu

made many amendments to joe biden's proposed cease-fire plan, but the americans did not mention it. at the same time , there are diplomatic and media pressures, or military pressures are actually applied to it because its navy and troops

have a victory, to achieve certain goals and to give security guarantees, in fact to the zionist regime and the so-called it is possible that he wants to give guarantees for palestinian return and exit occupiers, it is not known whether these will be implemented or not. mr. hadi al-qubaisi, you mentioned the role of the united states in these negotiations . my question is this. the spokesperson of our ministry of foreign affairs clearly stated that the punishment of the aggressor and the ceasefire will be two separate categories. in your opinion, ignoring the aggressor and settling for

it has reached a strategic equation that cannot show itself as a military power even in front of hamas, in front of a situation that is under siege , they want to continue the war anyway, they don't want to stop the war, they just want to they can put pressure on the resistance forces in qazdah, and in fact, iran's response helps to weaken the forces of the zionist regime. now , mr. qobaisi, do you think that the negotiations that iran is doing to avoid retaliation are to create peace in the region, or are they part of a puzzle that will deal more deadly blows to the resistance and iran in the future? if iran is crispy

, of course. or the axis of resistance, because it attacked the iranian consulate in the past, and the response that iran gave was actually a good action, but the israelis are under pressure to invade again, and there should be a response. may they not be able to commit these violations . anyway, they are at a level of intense internal pressure and the islamic republic of iran can take advantage of this situation because they also lost against hamas and now we see that the israeli regime is weak and could not achieve its goals despite the fact that before the 10th of may, he fought and used all his power

, so i think this should be answered. very well , thank you, mr. hadi al-qubaisi, an analyst of west asian issues. i will say goodbye to you . we will continue our conversation with mr. dr. motaghi, respected professor. the university of tehran, who is with us from shiraz , dr. motaghi, in recent days, westerners are claiming that iran's response to the assassination of martyr haniyeh will affect the ceasefire . what is the purpose of these claims in your opinion? as you pointed out, biden is following up on the issue of an election within america itself. in a way, trump and camilla harris are in a very hot situation.