in english, this is a person like bruce, who is so well informed and knowledgeable about the affairs of the persian gulf. he says that bahrain has been a part of the collective expression of pars province in all periods of history, and it is an acknowledgment of a historical fact and it is important that the plenipotentiary representative of the british government in the persian gulf region is azaan. it refers to iran's sovereignty over bahrain, so there must be a historical fact. when this representative comes

, he recognizes this. well, it is very important from our point of view. we always rely heavily on this issue of the shiraz agreement in our dispute with the british, whenever we raise our claims. let's do it, because it has been officially said there that a person like adam bruce was not an ignorant person, so the evidences have ruled that this bahrain belonged to iran in different periods. but the infinite power of the british and our weakness and stupidity have made us unable to fulfill this right of ours, but the iranian government sent troops to bahrain many times during the qajar era, the rulers there have documents, they all consider themselves dependent and subordinate to the iranian government and always the flag of shirshid on top of the command headquarters of the rulers of bahrain and the government

of iran is the governor of fars and southern ports so that a delegation carrying the order and the khalat will be sent to bahrain and the sheikh of bahrain will receive the friendship and support of the shah of iran against britain. to assure him and in return ask him to express his devotion and loyalty to the king and the government as in the past. in two letters, one to the shah of iran and the other to the wari of fars, sheikh mohammad, the ruler of bahrain , declares his loyalty and absolute obedience to the sovereignty of iran and says: because aftab is clear that

bahrain has been part of the possessions since the distant past. it was iran and the sheikhs and residents of bahrain were always under the protection of that noble government khadim knows the so-called officials of iran, he says that we have our government because of the favor and favor of the king of iran and the king of fars, who will reign till the end of the world . whatever you tell us, we will obey, and he even says that the british representative asked me to i didn't accept it and said that you should come to the place of my command. even the government of iran sets salaries for sheikh mohammad to show that this is not an autonomous ruler. these two documents are really one of the reasons other than

the shiraz agreement that if we went to a gathering , we would go to a court, we said sir, this is sheikh mohammad he says that i am a citizen of iran, a citizen, he says, not only me, but all of atoubi al-khalifa, citizens of iran, if we were to bring it up in court, then this score is 20. 1820. "and we had always resisted the iranian claim, we took the view that bahrain was an independent state, and it was an independent arab state, and we had always taken that view, through the 19th century, the dispute over the claim, which became an anglo-iranian dispute because we were looking after bahrain's foreign policy, flared up and flared down, and i think it was in the 1850s it led to a breach in diplomatic relations. it was

always on the table between us. negotiations went on and went off and went on again and went off again. in 1336, the council of ministers in the palace. marmar is formed in the presence of the king himself, and there the division of the country is approved , and iran has 14 provinces, the fourteenth of which is the iranian islands of the persian gulf, centered on bahrain, that's why it became famous. the province of the 14th province of bahrain, i don't know if the british protested , the government at the time rejected all this and stood behind it with all its strength, but gradually we see that this issue occurs, this speech

comes out of the shah's mouth that the oil here is over and the theme is over, it is no longer worth it for us, the documents show that with the british government. they examine these issues and how to prepare public opinion. the british give instructions to the iranian government about preparing public opinion. shenota massoud. something that should be settled and we had. number of talks, and i without any authority from london, but on the strength of a one sentence in a telegram i received in the for office said, what about trying to the united nations, settling it that way, but i say i couldn't, i had no authority for doing this,

but he um said, well i talked to shah, i'm seeing him tomorrow night or some, two days later he telephoned me and said, come and see me, have tea with me, and i went to see him. and he said i went to the shah on christmas eve 1968 and this is a possible way of getting united nations to go and sound public opinion and yes this is a constructive idea i like but that in the case of bahrain, senator abbas masoudi, the director of the information newspaper in the role justifier the separation of bahrain from iran had a mission. in those years, the newspaper

had specially placed the issue of bahrain at the top of its news and published articles in this regard. sheikh sabah ahmad al-sabah: the foreign minister of kuwait proposed to ardeshir zahedi in a meeting: if the representatives of iran and bahrain directly enter into the dialogue, would it be possible to get a result from this dialogue? zahedi welcomes this plan, believing that in the absence of england, useful negotiations will take place. unaware that the british designer. they were thinking about this at the end of 1968 in mordero, switzerland, in a private villa ardeshir zahedi after 150 years, representatives of iran and bahrain face each other.

crown prince sheikh khalifa bin salman was the main representative of bahrain. amir khosro afshar, representative of iran and ambassador of kuwait. they also accompanied them. the details of these negotiations are not known. but it seems that the issue of referring the issue to the united nations has been discussed, and after a short break, the second round of negotiations will continue in geneva. it was a hotel not far from geneva, so to speak , so to speak. he was afshar, and the main representative of my so-called bahraini sheikh was sheikh khalifa alone the pressure was on us to turn it into a kind of referendum and plebiscite, and not doing so, if

he agreed to hold a referendum there or to hold some kind of referendum, was in fact a sign of this. whose government is completely illegitimate , while he said that i am 200 years old, who is actually a member of the al-khalifa family. they are exercising sovereignty over there, and he considered himself legitimate, and as soon as he accepted the principle of referring to public votes, he himself questioned this legitimacy, and the british agreed with this. the term is a kind of voting they did not want this to be an egyptian thing in the so-called south of the persian gulf. it is enough for any sheikh to say, "well, let's refer to the public votes

and the referendum will have two modes: either the people of bahrain will vote for iran, which will destroy the whole plan of the british, or 30% of the people of bahrain will vote for iran , and 70% will vote for independence. again, this is harmful, it shows that a certain percentage of bahraini people are in favor of iran's sovereignty and iran's sovereignty over bahrain and the legitimate rule of law. this strong resistance that the english made in front of the referendum was a reason that these the victory in the referendum is not certain, and maybe iran would have won the referendum, and the issue of referring the issue to arbitration has also been raised, that is, the second solution. it was to submit the matter to the hague court for arbitration, but

both iran, england and bahrain all understood that this was a very long process and considering that there was a deadline at that time and that deadline was actually england left the persian gulf in 1969. this solution is actually out of the question. in january 1347, the shah traveled to asian countries with farah and ardeshir zahedi in the end, a normal trip with an unexpected ending comes to india. at the end of that trip, shah said in a press interview with billets magazine in new delhi.

he defends the sovereignty of bahrain, and for once this surprised everyone, the tone of the shah's interview was worse than the tone of the shah's interview when he said that if we take bahrain by force, what will happen, every day will be like palestine, every day we will have to kill . he says that bahrain has no iranian identity at all. if we go, for example, unlike the people of bahrain , the delegation accompanying the shah's press delegation was really unexpected for them and they did not know that such a thing was happening. it is called how can they face this development, even

the political group with the shah and for example mr. zahedi also said in a press interview and he was completely unaware of this matter that the shah might mention, the people of hazrat said that we we don't force things, so i was very upset. because it was too sudden to prevent the leak of this news to the foreign press , but it was too late and the story leaked out , that is, they were talking about bahrain in such a way that, for example, the french were going to occupy al-jazeera. we wanted it that way let's think, well, at that time, for example

, he should have thought differently about the issue of azerbaijan. i think that his speech was ill-considered, that is, england did not ask him for such a thing, no one asked him for such a thing, and he wanted to justify this omission. understood, i got very excited and i telephoned my counselor, it was in the evening up to say, look, this is the first breakthrough we've got, and from then onwards negotiations proceeded.

the occurrence of the industrial revolution and the creation and expansion of factories and industries, despite the many fruits that are for england and other advanced countries of that time, such as france , had no other reason for the results of the burning of women except for colonization and exploitation, which benefited the deprived and oppressed nations and the weak sections of the countries. i saw a large crowd dying of starvation in front of my eyes. it has been proven to me that all these misfortunes are due to the fact that the wealth of a nation is being despoiled by another oppressive nation. i want to show how england

has sucked india's blood year after year and brought it closer to death and destruction. industrial colonialist states to provide raw materials for their factories and industries they plundered other weak nations in various ways and made these countries the market for their products, thereby crippling their economy. of course, in many cases, they entered through friendship, such as concluding unilateral contracts and granting temporary benefits, and in case of resistance , the colonialists took up arms and carried out military attacks or conspiracy and even coups to overthrow their puppet rulers. england's advance in maritime industries had provided them with the opportunity to attack different countries more dominantly than other colonialists. they established the indian company eastern have dominated the fertile areas of south asia and

since then all the colonial operations and domineering relations of england with the nations of south asia through the company. the deep influence and domination of england over india after 3 centuries of the establishment of this company caused india to be declared as a part of england and queen victoria was not crowned as the queen of india and england. this period is considered to be the era of looting of the people of india by england, which under the guise of economic relations and trade and commerce became the basis for political influence in this land. the british government followed an economic and ruthless agenda during the colonial period of the indian subcontinent. order a work that left no room for pity for the natives of the subcontinent. the indian subcontinent suffered countless crises, the worst of which happened in bengal. accessing huge resources and plundering the riches

of india gave england the permission to expand its continuous territories even more , and the british navy attacked the coast of china. in this war, the victory was due to the superior technology of england and it led to bad results for the chinese. in the continuation of the colonial conquests , england's eyes turned to the middle east and the persian gulf and entered into a greedy competition with other powers it was colonized especially by france. meanwhile, a vast civilized country. with its rich wealth and important strategic position in the middle east, iran became one of the main targets of british influence. with the russian revolution of october 1917, the qajar dynasty, which was under the influence of the russians in the north and under the british colonization from the south , was deprived of the support of the russians, and the time had come for

its long-time rival, england , to gradually expand its presence in iran without the need to share resources. to stabilize more than before. as the gateway to india, iran was always considered by the british, and the domination of iran led to the continuation of the domination over far india keeping russia from british territories was a continuation. with russia leaving the circle of international relations for a short period due to the october revolution, the main player in the region in the middle east. here , the british empire became, and basically, they no longer have any partner and share in their game and in fact , they do not consider the fate of the people of the region. the british, who now realized its extraordinary position with the emergence of oil in iran,

attacked the south of iran several times with the aim of separating afghanistan , and since iran was facing the problem of not having a powerful government inside, in august 12994, with people's resistance was faced under the command of ali delwari. we are not fighting to get anything. we fight not to lose anything. with the start of the first world war, between 1917 and 1919 , despite declaring neutrality, iran suffered the most damage from this war, and about half of the country's population fell victim to the ambitions of the big countries and colonialism. they became that era. the british also committed the biggest genocide of the 20th century by setting up a ban and preventing the importation of people's necessities in iran. the ministry of foreign affairs of england

was looking for the areas that were in possession and actually under the dominion after the first world war england was put under its own control and it was under control. classics progressed step by step and the possibility of greater influence of england in the region was provided.

in the border lines of iran in the east of the country, support of local laws, domination of the persian gulf, acquisition of exclusive concessions regarding oil, shipping, establishment of

shahshahi bank, capitulation, intimidation policy, horizontal division, support of emerging sects such as baha'i, from among them were the measures that were left over from the intervention of the british in iran during the qajar period and the beginning of the first pahlavi period. with the extraction of oil in iran, british colonial policies in iran from it started with economic influence and ended with political influence and domination . the british were not looking for a stable government in iran. the british were looking for a government in iran that could use the sword against the people . but he is weak and powerless against the british. he can use his violence against people . but against the power of england. therefore, the formation of a new government with a coherent central power for england guaranteed

that its interests, including oil and other exploitable resources in iran, in addition to the market, in addition to its sovereignty and military force, were continuously in authority the power of the british empire will be and no new phenomenon will threaten it. traces of the intervention of the effective role of england can be seen in events such as the deviation in the constitutional revolution, the coup d'etat of march 3rd, 1320 and august 28, 1332, and they did not stop there and even tried to disintegrate iran, which british colonialism led to light and order. it has separated bahrain from the motherland, we unite together, we believed, the root of

the old colonialist's exploitation. after the victory of the revolution, he had to collect his colonialism from this region. but in the war imposed by iraq's baath regime against iran saddam's supporters start their attempt to infiltrate again , which again leads to failure. documents and documents that have recently been published indicate that during the iran-iraq war, britain stopped increasing the stockpile of weapons by senior british officials after learning that iraqi chemical fertilizer factories were producing gas using british equipment. it has been said that they showed less desire to ban the production of chemical weapons. these documents actually define a new dimension of the policy of western countries, especially the united kingdom, before the iraq war against iran.

most of the people of the world towards crime. british colonialism in recent centuries is known in various asian, african and american countries , but the full story of the occupying and colonial presence of the british government in the land of its european neighbors is perhaps less known. one of the european countries that has been scarred by the british occupation for years was the island country. in the local elections of 1918, the british government was defeated. and the republican party of iland , known as sinn fein, wanted the independence of iland and achieved a remarkable victory. with the outbreak of world war ii the decline of the sun of the british empire began. debts caused by the war along with the emergence of nationalism at the global level pushed british colonialism out of the middle east and it wasn't long before the old colonialism

gave way to america, the emerging power emerging from the ruins of world war ii. world war ii shook england's authority in the region. in this war, great human losses, financial, industrial, most of the navy and many parts of england's agriculture were destroyed. and england suffered from economic weakness and the balance of payments deficit turned this country into a vulnerable country. in the first half of the 20th century and with the emergence of new powers such as japan and especially the united states, england experienced a free fall , which can be referred to as the independence of india, the end of the british protectorate over palestine and jordan, the nationalization of iranian oil in 1951, and the british withdrawal from the suez canal. although england

withdrew its military forces from the region , it was not easily willing to give up its interests in the region to the extent that sometimes the heads of the british government also admitted that the withdrawal of our military forces does not mean that there is no more attention to this region. we are not important, we only care about our relationships the leaders of today's arab governments

, bismillah rahman al-rahim salam, the vice president of transportation of the highway and road transportation organization , will definitely refer to the public road transportation system about the readiness of the bus fleet to ride personal plates.