the hand-to-hand war has turned into areas where the zionist regime has a direct presence, and basically the intervention of the zionist regime in the war. in fact, second to qorbagh , the presence of the zionist regime in the northern borders of iran and in the northwestern borders is also a very important and serious issue. iran will not be tolerated in any way because we recognize the siminists in this region as terrorists. and we identified and we are identifying, as a result , the presence of the zionist regime is a very serious issue that can definitely affect our internal security , even though the israelis have tried many times in the past. to penetrate into iran through this area, to commit sabotage , to commit terrorist acts, all of which have been recorded and recorded and are available, so these are the main reasons, and of course, in addition to all of this, and more importantly, . all this is a corridor issue, that is

, this project is aimed at advancing the political suffocation of iran and depriving iran of transit routes and at the same time creating a kind of geographical and geopolitical blockage in iran's north-west borders, these are the main reasons that iran opposes it does, and of course besides all this both the actually illusory plans that exist, such as the plan that is being discussed today in the republic of azerbaijan, armenia is actually identified as west azerbaijan, or the plans that have been published and published again in the last week. it is showing that the south of armenia, i.e. the sionik province of armenia, belongs to the republic of azerbaijan, and the republic of azerbaijan is actually planning to annex this region to its own territory in the future , which will not be accepted by iran in any way. we will continue this conversation. definitely about its other editions.

a border with the purpose of connecting two parts of the republic azerbaijan to each other, for which the transition and economic goals have also been defined, is a corridor that the republic of azerbaijan named zang zor and connects this country to turkey and from there to europe.

the land of armenia on this road violates the international space and thus completely blinds and closes the border of the islamic republic of armenia. after the second qorbagh war in 2020 , baku tried to annex the border line in sivnik region to armenia in exchange for ceding parts of qorbagh to armenia. the efforts that did not succeed due to the opposition of armenia and of course iran peace negotiations between the two countries. it was removed, but it has been two or three months since this issue was raised again, and iran's reaction followed the same as in the past. we welcome any initiative that can provide a basis for development in the region, but at the same time, under no circumstances will we accept the geopolitical change and the change of stable borders in the region. any threat to the transversal integrity of our neighbors or the redrawing of borders, whether to the north or to the south. both

in the east and in the west, it is completely unacceptable and is considered a red line for iran. changing the borders is the most important reason for iran's opposition to the construction of this it is a corridor that, to put it simply , practically destroys the border between iran and armenia. hossein rouhani of sed and sima news agency. mr. dr. kazemi, mr. bahman, referring to the consequences of the formation of nato's torani corridor, let's talk more about its consequences. but there are certainly other things left by nato's intelligence and geopolitical conspiracy behind the scenes of this intelligence, we should mention them in the form of a series of developments that we call at the international level as the transition to the new regional and global order. as the supreme leader said, one of the characteristics of the realist is order the new transfer of power is actually from the west to asia

, and in this transfer of power, one of the most remote regions is the eurasian region, or to narrow it down, the caucasus region. this region is the only region that is actually with three powers and is involved in the discussion of the new global and regional order , i.e. iran, russia, and china, bordering on the only point on the planet that each of the three countries actually has a border because of this. for years , western think tanks, especially american and english , have been seeking to connect these countries with a series of foci in this region. in fact, the total aggression and invasions that were carried out in afghanistan or the expansion of nato to the east and

the ukraine debate can be evaluated in this puzzle. well , when we look at the map, one of the main routes of china and russia in order to actually transfer the transit of this region of the caucasus and central asia, that is , when we talk about nato's torani corridor, it means the corridor behind which the geopolitical, geoeconomic, and even geopolitical goals and consequences are actually planned against these actors . to supply its own gas from russia b after nord stream 1 and nord steam 2 are removed from the agenda, this should be the caspian sea of ​​the republic of azerbaijan and central asia. well, it is important where this energy transfer passage is from and which country controls it. this control over transit and

energy passages is one of the components of if you play a role in the new global and regional order, you are a child in the plans related to the opening of the baku pipeline. look at jehane from about 20 years ago. there, in the presence of the presidents of azerbaijan, georgia, turkey, and the president of bp, the american official, we see that the map of the southern part of armenia is divided and goes towards azerbaijan and not being able to join, that is, the nato world and the english pantharianism , have been looking for such a statement for decades, since mr. paul gobel was a black officer several years ago. the turkish authorities are following this and therefore this plan is for iran, and now after 3 decades, it is actually for russia, from my point of view, nato expansion , transition discussions, energy discussions, and ethnic discussions, and for

china, which is the province of sinkiang. it is actually one of the goals of english panthoranism, so it has some implications. for iran, naturally, its implications are more sensitive because it is one of its implications geoculture debates means the turanian world that england is looking for is trying to form, one of its goals is to fight against the azerbaijani identity, to weaken the shiite and iranian historical identity of azerbaijan and turn it into a fake turanian identity or what they define as the turkish world. and naturally , well. the issue should be defined as a red line for iran from different points of view. i think we will have about 5 minutes until the end of the conversation, mr. dr. bahmand, mr. dr. kazemi, pointing to the erst pass, of course , giving a very brief explanation about it, but let's see that this issue that is raised there is how much can it play a role in ending

differences and of course strengthening cooperation? the islamic republic of iran, since the issues related to this imaginary corridor have been raised. in addition to his principled opposition to the geopolitical changes in the region, shed also presented an innovative plan , one of those innovative plans is actually the ars pass, which of course existed in the past , that is, in the years after the collapse of the soviet union, the republic of azerbaijan was almost in the form of free actually used iran's transportation route to communicate with naqdjawan. now there were discussions about that this route may be a bit bumpy or inappropriate, in fact, the condition of the road is that the islamic republic of iran is trying to actually improve the routes and develop the routes, and this route can actually be a suitable alternative. well, this suitable alternative

, first of all, actually preserves corridor communication in the region, which means that everyone can use it , just like everyone used it in the past years. it seems that the russians are actually connecting to armenia through iran's anzali mian port, and the republic of azerbaijan is connecting to nakhtjeban, turkey. it is connected to the republic of azerbaijan, so this corridor can actually play the role it has had in the past years, in fact , it is actually a plan that has existed in the past and it will put to sleep the differences, as it will not create political changes in the region and i will prevent the creation of more problems in the region. right now, the peace plan, in fact, the republic of azerbaijan and armenia are involved in the same corridor issue. if this is completely abandoned, the two countries can definitely reach the most favorable results. we have four minutes. if i think additional point

thank you very much for your comments about the wedding ceremony. you see, as mr. sobhani , our esteemed ambassador in armenia , pointed out the issue well and in my opinion, the miracle. the islamic republic of iran is not opposed to the discussion of roads and communication lines in the caucasus. coma is the most leading country in fact. the re-opening of the communication lines after the first qorbagh war was 3 decades ago and during that war until now . in addition to our view, which is actually opposition to geopolitical and border changes, some people may consider it as a negative view. we also have a positive view and we believe that due to the negative mentality in armenia towards the geopolitical and ethnic movements of azerbaijan and turkey, the problems that are actually due to

the interference of regional and extra-regional actors , yes, as shown in the map characteristically, if the issue is the same as in the map, that the republic of azerbaijan is somehow connected to the youth criticism, then naturally there are different paths and the path known as zionism or as zang zor is not the only way, ars discussion is actually the best way to connect the republic of azerbaijan to nakhad zabaneh because there is only one path that is implemented in the country, in which there are no historical, ethnic, security geopolitical goals and desires, and iran's proposal in presenting kori is actually an example of the practical adherence of the islamic republic

to the solution of collective cooperation that can create development and stability in the region. . it is that we, our people, our public opinion should know that something called zangzor corridor will not be established either by diplomacy or by force, and this policy is the basic policy of the islamic republic of iran. yes, this policy is the basic policy of the islamic republic of iran. at the same time, iran is the land. himself as an intermediary ares corridor can allow others to have their transportation routes established without

actually wanting to create a problem here , without wanting to see political changes happen or without wanting to advance imaginary issues such as panturanism and so on. it is better for the countries involved in this issue to make a general review of their policy and macro strategies, evaluate all issues and then enter the field of decision-making or enter the field of action and implementation. anyway, iran has shown in the past that if draw a red line at the foot of that red line it will stand and in this case it will definitely be the case. in this regard, iran has no respect with any of the countries in the region and even with the great powers, because the issue is the issue of national security and the issue of national interests. it is iran. thank you very much to both honorable guests of this program, mr. dr. kazemi, mr. dr. shahib bahman, and

mr. mohsen pakain, the former ambassador of iran to the republic of azerbaijan. good night and god bless you for accompanying us. in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's world, in the first case of tonight's program , we will take a look at the latest status of the telegram owner 's draft in france, which

has shown the first signs of retreating and yielding to the demands of the french government. we will discuss in upsala. in the second case , we will examine the words of the us defense minister about the impossibility of ukraine's operation on russian soil , as well as trump's recent words that the sanctions against russia, iran, and china are causing the dollar to die. in this context, mr. matthew erritt a researcher from the american university of moscow will accompany me . but on the 37th day of the war in gaza, the program with the latest developments and pictures from palestine. we are starting al-alami nashoof ish al-zarba this kalah laqina al-shahda

under the guidance of women, children, children, adults, mesh arif mesh arif al shabat

, azrab community, but after 11

months, different parts of the world are still witnessing demonstrations in support of the people of fel. we see the latest images of these gatherings in europe. see you

as i said at the beginning of the program, in the first case of tonight's program, we want

to examine the latest developments in the trial of telegram owner pavel durov in france. recently, the french have also issued an order to leave france, meaning that until daruf does not cooperate, there is no way to escape from france . the first sparks of withdrawal and further cooperation have appeared. telegram has shown new changes and durov also talked about further measures in his first statement after his arrest in france . tonight we will further examine the beginning of the surrender process of pavel drov to the french government. but before the conversation, we see a report. a week ago, police cars left the anti-fraud office in paris

france said: the ceo of telegram will be released from the french prison. that's it. pavel dorf was temporarily released on bail of 5 million euros. now the media reported that the ceo of telegram has been saved from the french prison for more than 5 million euros . telegram has quietly updated its policies so that users can report private conversations and chats to content monitors. the american newspaper techcrunch writes that this silent change, which happened immediately after dorf's release from french police custody, means that users can use just a few taps from a private conversation. until a group felt anywhere.

it seems that these provide information that should be kept confidential in principle. as this political analyst says, this change destroys what telegram had tried to introduce to its competitive position among other messengers, namely its claim of minimal monitoring of user interactions. the ceo of telegram himself has now admitted that it has been easy for criminals to operate in telegram, and he should change his approach. fatemeh sharifi of sed and sima news agency. tonight,

we have with us mr. garek simes, a professor of communication and media at uppsala university. hello mr. simon. hello, good evening. i remember last week when draft was arrested in france and we were talking on the same program today. you said that darf's arrest was aimed at forcing him to give in to requests behind the scenes. a few days after our conversation, although the french opened the door.

look at the reasons behind the scenes. these reasons behind the scenes are for them to make sure that they can keep the dwarf under control and that the dwarf cannot escape from them and cannot take the illegal pressures that are being put against him. from under these pressures call mr. sime. in the latest development in this field, we had daruf's first personal position after his arrest. in the statement he published, the owner of telegram mentioned some interesting points that we want to review with you. in the most important part of this statement, which is the final paragraphs, daruf it is kind of accepted that telegram is not perfect and its actions have not met the expectations.

he expressed hope that the events that happened in his detention in august will help make telegram safer. what do you think about this draft? does this position indicate that the draft is to be taken? his freedom from france is surrendered to the demands that have been made of him. see this is actually a very complicated issue because i am sure dorf knows what happens to the people in liberal democracies and what the relations between the authorities and the people are like. he has also seen other people like julian assange . things have happened to them, so i think that these democracies

should send a message to others and show them that it is a serious issue and that it is important to show them. it should be said that we had from zuckerberg who expressed regret. in order to publish the selected information they want about the corona virus, and this information is actually correct, it is not available, but it is information that the government should be interested in, only

they are published. besh and zuckerberg would do this for them. in fact, the way they do this is that they use information and knowledge as a weapon to control people and decide what people will hear and react to. now, with regard to a point as you mentioned, the ongoing process in the dorf case in france is going in this direction. for him to accept these conditions and demands, this is a very attractive and interesting moment because dorf is a