the agreement, in fact, the ceasefire that was concluded between the republic of azerbaijan and armenia through mediation , is no longer valid, that is, if it was stated in article 9 of that agreement that the communication routes should be restored or reconstructed, it was due to the fact that in that agreement, armenia allowed this possibility. find that he uses the lachin corridor to access qorbagh, while the qorbagh issue was actually resolved and the republic of azerbaijan was able to dominate qarbagh in the third war anyway, so that agreement itself is no longer valid at all , today it wants to base this issue on get a date the second point is that the russians have peacekeeping forces in the region due to the same agreement. well , where are the russian peacekeeping forces in the region today?

what's worse is that if even one such corridor is formed and in the future azerbaijan does not allow traffic to russia or transit of goods to russia, then what will russia do? the armenian government does not want to create a corridor or any route other than if he is the ruler there, apart from his own rule, he actually has a negative view, so the government. including russia, and if in the future the republic of azerbaijan acts as a barrier to russia's access, then what will they do? this is a very important issue, because in the past years , the country that has the most divergence from russia in the caucasus region is this. the republic of azerbaijan was one of the leading countries in the region that concluded security and military agreements with nato, and was one of the first countries to

locate russian bases in its own territory. since the fall of the soviet union, so these are issues of rhetoric and strategy that must be paid attention to in their own equations . and let's examine the reasons for it together , mr. mohsen pakistan, the former ambassador of the islamic republic of iran. in the republic of azerbaijan , the addition of mr. pakain to our group, i greet you , good night, mr. araghchi, the minister of foreign affairs , published a message in the virtual space and wrote that every a threat against the horizontal integrity of our neighbors or the redrawing of borders, be it in the north, in the south , in the east or in the west, is completely unacceptable , it is unacceptable, and this is considered a red line for the islamic republic of iran. what message does he have? in the name

of allah, the most merciful , i will respond to the official service and dear guests. well, you see, we are very sensitive to international borders, and as dr. araghchi also said, the red line is the islamic republic of iran, but we have to see that until that stage that men probably changes how far it is. the main issue is between armenia and azerbaijan it means that azerbaijan is planning to reach naharj jawan via zangzor route. if armenia accepts this demand, armenia will make new demands so that it can reach iran via azerbaijan route. they

will come to this conclusion, but azerbaijan does not want to open the way for armenia, because azerbaijan's policy is to keep armenia under siege, and for this reason, the two sides, due to the difficulty of negotiations, decided to withdraw zang zu from the peace talks. and make a peace agreement, that is, in currently, the issue of opening the bell of force, either in the form of war, which is ruled out, in the case of war , the borders will change, or in the form of conflict , is currently not on the agenda of these two countries, but the russians, as friends have pointed out. they are looking to somehow open this road so that russian troops can be stationed there and not allow foreign forces, including nato, from this road.

the islamic republic of iran should follow its own consultations with russia, armenia and azerbaijan by avoiding speculations. and according to these common points that all three countries have in in relation to not allowing foreign countries to enter the bayan region, they can plan to not allow nato and countries outside the region, which are always looking for war, to enter kafbaz. belief former ambassador of the islamic republic of iran to the republic of azerbaijan , i say goodbye to you, mr. dr. kazemi, do you have a point about the article that mr. araghchi published in the virtual space, a point that they emphasized, which

is considered a red line for the islamic republic of iran, yes. the changes are actually geopolitical the red line is actually our country in the caucasus. in fact, usoli is not limited to the last 3-4 years. due to the same position we had after the first karabakh war , our country has not only supported the horizontal integrity of the republic of azerbaijan since 3 decades ago , but has also been the biggest supporter of the republic of azerbaijan in various fields, including the military field, which is one of the advantages of this connection. the republic of azerbaijan has been through iran's territory for a long time, and even now, the principled position continues, that is, we cannot actually divide the countries into good or bad countries from the perspective of greed, from the perspective of neighboring countries, from the perspective of land occupation. from the point of view of the un charter and international law , in fact, any changes in international borders

are actually prohibited based on the rules of amera, and hamm's position is actually published on this issue, except for what is important about the discussion of the corridor. for sure , both the media and our diplomats should pay attention to the fact that when we use the word "corridor" or "corridor", it's "forceful" because this term is actually the president of azerbaijan's exact claim on sivnik province of armenia, and because of this, in in fact, both from a legal point of view, that is , the rules of international law, and from a political point of view the perspective of historical topics such as the claim of history and the counter claim of history. yes, and from our national point of view , it is wrong, and it is very important that both our media and the people in charge pay attention to the use of this fake word, because these fake words

were created by the same people. in fact , it is used against us in a very contrived way, and naturally , we should look at the matter from this point of view . let me talk about mr. bahman, the same topic, even though mr. dr. kazemi, mr. pakain mentioned it let's talk more and emphasize on it . let's continue that now iran considers any change in geopolitics as well as the borders of the caucasus to be against its national interests. have some hints and emphasize on the issues of dr. kazemi. why is this issue so important for the islamic republic of iran? before i get into this topic, i would like to point out one thing very quickly. in fact, iran's position on the issue of the imaginary zangzor corridor is that this is the red line that has been identified and iran will not accept geopolitical changes in this area in any way, so because these days the space our social media and our media are full of these discussions, and

there were some provocations in the public opinion, so our people should rest easy . such an incident will not happen in reality and this is the fundamental position of the islamic republic of iran and there will be no problems in it. the second point is about russia, because in any case, the recent comments of the russian officials in russia actually caused this news wave in iran, or reprocessed the issue in iran. pay attention to this point. let us know that yes, we may have differences of opinion with russia in the caucasus region, but in other areas , we have very close cooperation, even

if, contrary to our opinion, it should turn into a tension or affect our other cooperation, but zangi zor corridor for several reasons for iran, for iran's national interests and for security. iran's national risk is a mixed issue, the same issue is actually nato, and that nato finds the possibility to have a wider presence in the northwest borders of iran, and well, this is nato's big plan to be able to, i said, the three countries of iran. to restrain russia and china at the same time and this plan can help nato a lot in this regard. the second point of this line is panturanism, whose ideas are actually not new ideas, but it seems that the ideologues or

in any case, the designers of those years recorded and are patiently carrying out a very big project, which, well, this will certainly not go anywhere, considering iran's stance and red lines , but anyway, it is an issue that can be resolved. it affects our national security and our internal security. the third point is the issue of the presence of the siminist regime. see in the fourth last year well, the neighboring areas of iran and the republic of azerbaijan have actually become the mediators of the hand-to-hand war , becoming areas where the siphonist regime has a direct presence, and basically, the intervention of the siminist regime in the war is actually a very important and serious issue. the simonist regime in the northern borders of iran and in the northwestern borders of iran will not be tolerated in any way.

these are the main reasons, and of course, besides all these and most importantly , there is the corridor issue, which means that this project is aimed at promoting geopolitical suffocation for iran and depriving iran. of transit routes and at the same time creating a kind of geographical and geopolitical blockage in iran's northwest borders, these are the main reasons that iran opposes and of course. in addition to all this , there is actually an illusion about the plans, such as the plan that is being discussed

today in the republic of azerbaijan, armenia is actually identified as west azerbaijan , or the plans that have been published in the last week. it has been published again, showing that the south of armenia, that is, sivnik province of armenia , belongs to the republic of azerbaijan, and the republic in fact, azerbaijan is planning to destroy this region in the future, so we will see a report in no way. let's go back to the studio and discuss the program in the last minutes. in recent days, talks about a transit route on the northern borders of iran with the republic of armenia have been repeated once again. one of the objectives of the military action of the republic of azerbaijan against armenia four years ago was to separate

the land route of iran and armenia for direct access to nakhel javan from the south sionik area or the alleged zangzor corridor, a border corridor with the aim of connecting the two parts of the territory of the republic of azerbaijan. transitional and economic goals have also been defined for him . it was named zang zor and connects this country to turkey and from there to europe. the sovereignty of armenia on this road violates the international space and thus completely blinds and closes the border between the islamic republic of armenia and armenia. after the second qorbagh war in 2020, baku tried to annex the border line in sivnik region to armenia in exchange for handing over parts of qorbagh to armenia. the efforts that did not succeed due to the opposition of armenia and of course iran and were excluded from the peace talks between the two countries

but it has been two or three months since this issue was brought up again, and iran's reaction followed the same as before . we welcome any initiative that can provide the basis for development in the region. but at the same time, under no circumstances will we accept geopolitical changes and permanent border changes in the region. any threat against all. crossing our neighbors or redrawing the borders whether in the north, in the south, in the east or in the west is completely unacceptable and is considered a red line for iran. changing the borders is the most important reason for iran's opposition to the construction of this corridor let's say that this corridor practically destroys iran's border with armenia. hossein rouhani, a member of sda news agency, mr. dr. kazemi, mr. bahman, mentioning the consequences of the formation of nato's turani corridor , let's talk more about its consequences

. nato intelligence and political intrigue behind the scenes of this intelligence should be considered in the form of a series of developments that we are called at the international level as the bearer of the new regional and global order. as the supreme leader said, one of the characteristics of the new order is the transfer of power from the west to asia. and in this transfer of power, one of the oldest regions for geopolitical reasons and zhu. now this is the eurasia region, or let's narrow it down , it is the caspian sea, the caspian sea, and central asia. see, this is the only region that actually shares with three powers in the discussion of the new world and regional order , i.e. iran, russia and china, bordering only one point. from

the planet that borders all three countries , that's why for years , western ideas, especially american and british , have been seeking to actually bring these countries together through the implementation of projects in this region. dynasty the internal centers of the crisis should be involved from a geopolitical point of view. in fact, the aggressions and invasions that took place in afghanistan or the expansion of nato to the east and the ukraine debate can be included in this puzzle. there is an assessment , well, when we look at the map, one of the main routes for china and russia to transfer is actually the caucasus and central asia region, that is , when we talk about nato's turani corridor, it means the corridor behind which there are political goals and tendencies and

geo-economics and even geo-culture are actually against these program actors. nato is looking for europe to supply its own gas from russia instead from the agenda, nord stream one nord stream two should be the caspian sea of ​​the republic of azerbaijan and central asia. well, it is important where this energy transfer passage is from and which country controls it . in the new order. and there is a region, if you look at the maps related to the opening of the baku-tbilisi-ceyhane pipeline about 20 years ago, there, in the presence of the presidents of azerbaijan, georgia, turkey, the president of bp, and the american official, we see that the map of the southern part of armenia divided and towards azerbaijan

joined means the nato world and british pan-europeanism from decades ago. he has been looking for such a solution since mr. pol gobel, the black officer , presented this plan several years ago, in fact 3 decades ago , in a different way, at that time, mr. azvid and other turkish officials were looking for this, and now after 3 decades, he is actually looking for this. it is possible and therefore this plan is for both iran and russia from the point of view of nato expansion, transition discussions, energy discussions, and ethnic discussions, and for china, which is actually the province of sinkian jaan. in fact, one of the targets is english panthoranism, well, for these, it is natural it is naturally more sensitive for iran , because one of its consequences is geopolitical debates, i.e. the turanian world that england is looking for, it is trying to form it, one of its goals is to fight against the

azerbaijani identity, to weaken the historical identity of shia and iranian azerbaijanis, and to fake the conversion of turanian or something like that. which they are defining as the turkish world, and it is natural that this issue will be defined as a red line for iran from different perspectives. of course, a very brief explanation about but let's see how much this topic can play a role in ending the differences and of course strengthening the cooperation of the islamic republic of iran since the issues related to this important corridor were raised, in addition to the principled opposition that actually with the geopolitical changes in the region, he also presented an innovative plan , and one of those innovative plans is actually the ars pass, which of course has existed since the past , that is, in the years after the collapse of the soviet union, the republic

of azerbaijan was almost free from iran's transportation route to connect with young criticism in actually, he used it. well, now there were discussions about the fact that this route might be a bit bumpy or inappropriate, in fact , the condition of the road. now, the islamic republic of iran is trying to actually improve the routes to the routes, develop the routes, and this route can actually be a suitable alternative, and this suitable alternative will actually preserve the corridor connections in the region, that is, all they can use it the same way everyone used it in the past years, but the russians actually go to armenia from the anzali port through iranian soil. the republic of azerbaijan is connected to the map. turkey will be connected to the republic of azerbaijan, so this corridor can actually play the role it has had in the past years, in

fact, it is actually a plan that has existed since the past and it will put the differences to rest, and it will also prevent the creation of political changes in i will prevent the region and create more problems in the region. right now, the peace plan, in fact, the republic of azerbaijan and armenia are involved in this anyway. there is a corridor issue that if this is completely abandoned, the two countries can definitely reach better results. four we have a minute, if i think you have any additional points regarding the wedding procession , please give us your summary in two minutes . thank you very much. just as mr. sobhani, our esteemed ambassador in armenia , pointed out the issue well and in my opinion, it is a miracle. . the islamic republic of iran is not opposed to the discussion of roads and communication lines in kafgaz. it is not the case that the most advanced country in actually reopening the communication lines after the first garbagh war, that is, from three decades ago and during that war

until now, we are considering that it is possible to oppose the geopolitical and border changes. from the point of view of some people, it can be considered as a kind of negative view, but we also have a positive view and that is with us. there are problems in azerbaijan and turkey, which are actually due to the interference of regional and trans-regional actors, yes, as shown in the map , if the issue is that the republic of azerbaijan is somehow connected to nakhodzvan , then naturally there are different paths and a path which is known as sionite or fake zang zor is not the only way. ars discussion is actually the best

solution to connect the republic of azerbaijan to nakhad zabaneh because it is the only path that is easy it is implemented , there are no ethnic, security and historical geopolitical goals and desires, and iran's proposal to provide the ars corridor is actually an example of the practical adherence of the islamic republic of iran to the 3 plus 3 plus three cooperation model, that is, by implementing the ars corridor for all countries in the region without exception. the three caucasus countries, turkey and russia, naturally use the benefits of this plan, because iran emphasizes the immutability of border and geopolitical lines, and at the same time, the solution. bring up collective cooperation that can create development and stability in the region. we also have a 1 minute and 30 second map do you have a supplementary point on your role, mr. wahmad? see

, the important point is that we, our people , our public opinion should know that something called zangzor corridor will not be established either by diplomacy or by force, and that this policy is the fundamental policy of the islamic republic. it is iran, give us another picture. yes, this policy is the fundamental policy of the islamic republic of iran, and at the same time, iran can give its land to others through the ars corridor, so that their transportation routes will be maintained without wanting to create a problem here without wanting to make changes. if jopolitics happens or not , imaginary issues such as panturanism and the like will actually be promoted, so it is better for the countries involved in this issue to make a general review of their politics and their macro strategies. evaluate all the issues and then enter the field

of definition. anyway, iran has shown in the past that if it draws a red line, it will stand by that red line, and in this case, it will definitely be the case. no, because the issue is the issue of national security and the issue of the issue it is iran's national interests. thank you very much to both honorable guests of this program, mr. dr. kazemi , mr. shahid bahman, and mr. mohsen pakaei of this page. earlier in iran in the republic of azerbaijan, we reviewed nato's turani experts in this program and discussed the issues raised . thank you very much for accompanying us. good night and god bless you.

in the name of allah, the most merciful, the deadline for the selection of the 1403 national exam will end today. the national testing organization announced that those accepted with the test.