harris and trump are nearly tied in the polls. the main topic of this debate was the economic plans of both sides. i plan to improve the living conditions of the middle class and workers because i know that the cost of living is very high for a large part of the american society. but trump does not have a clear economic plan. the increase in crime in the united states and important foreign policy issues were among the other topics of the debate between kamal harris and donald trump. if i

were the president, the situation in the middle east would not be like this , and the war in ukraine would not have happened. trump has ridiculed america on the world stage and world leaders donald trump laughs. the military commanders who have worked with you say that you are a rascal. in this situation, it seems that the capabilities and programs of these two election candidates. it does not meet the expectations of a large part of the american society. both candidates are repetition of previous disabilities. harris is a repetition of the administration of biden and trump, which is also a repetition . the program of both parties and their candidates, especially for the economy, is really disgraceful. unfortunately, none of the two candidates exchange honest information with people about their capabilities programs. donald trump and kamla

haris have not yet reached an agreement about the next debate, when it will be held, and even whether or not another debate will be held, and it is currently unknown that there will be another debate between the two in the 55 days remaining until the time of the american presidential election. no one will be held or not. ali rajabi, new york broadcasting news agency. very well , dr. motaghi, do you think this was the first and last debate? in the name of allah, the most merciful, you know that there was a debate between biden and trump before. just as your reporter referred to the issue . it is not yet agreed whether have another debate or not. because debates should be based on agreement. but my own approach is that definitely.

there is a reason for holding another debate, because each of them has motivation to win, and to win, they must have a battle and have an analysis, both of them need to attract the audience, so both call the gray layer so swear to themselves. this should and should be another debate in the order of this first debate that was held , accusing each other of lying and not having a weak plan. your performance has always been the same. in some cases, i remember insulting each other. who do you think was the winner of the first debate? the winner

of the trump-biden debate, who was trump and had a special place for biden to move , had an article today, and in that article he says that trump is very upset that camilla harris replaced biden and has a cartoon of him riding one of these cars in space. it has become fun and this is going towards. the media shows that camilla harris is much more successful socially but trump's economic plans are serious. the same report that you aired, out of the four people interviewed by your reporter, two of them emphasized on economic discussions for the citizens in general.

in america, economic issues are very important in the election environment, trump's view is a kind of economic mercantilism, that is, in the second point , he should change the balance of the discussion about exports and imports, so the industrial groups prefer trump to win, because more surplus to hand. in this situation, when there is more industrial production, there is scope for employment there is, but there is also a serious point, editing the message . let's put all this together. haris is undoubtedly the winner, and

haris entered with a force, the image he gave of himself, they say this with all aspects, even body movements, voice. the style of clothing is not just a basis for reasoning, logic, and economic or social program. what matters is how much you can work with emotions , how much you can communicate with different layers of people, and how much you can vote for different packages . haris is undoubtedly the winner, and i think the media and analytical consensus of america and the world is that 60 and more than 63 to 67 percent consider hadith to be the winner. trump was in a more or less defensive position , in terms of his message, which

he described as the psychology of fear and the psychology of hope . the picture she gave, especially the last part where you saw america falling, america completely messed up , bankrupt america, something like this, but mrs. harris gave a picture that was different, that whatever it is, we should not look only at the problems, let

's open the new chapter to back on the phrase that he repeated a lot that we should not go back and he means the so-called past debates and of course it does not mean that trump. he lost his base, not trump he maintained his base, but in the midst of those people who are not convinced until this moment and did not decide to forgive them, they were influenced by the greed of mr. doctor in this debate. these two have the support of kamel ali's regime now. he brought up the issue of the ceasefire in gaza and the presentation of a two-state plan. onor trump also said that if i don't come, the three-year-old regime will not last longer. if before the beginning

elections can be effective. look, one of the serious discussions that can be effective is related to candidate votes. biden's success is related to the truce. the point is that the israelis want trump to come to power, because they know that their tactical support is for the use of power politics, but the reality is that if trump if he comes to power, it is natural that his behavior pattern with russia and iran will not be separate from the atmosphere of the biden government, that is, biden trump's strategy in the pre-presidential period is offshore.

it used to be balancing, and now it maintains this offshore balancing, but kamila haris is in the field of foreign policy. and presenting it and of course its audience can bring more benefits to social groups and most importantly to the elites. even if trump exists , his approach is very populist. if those young people enter the election competition, it is natural that they will support trump. now you should also consider that dixani has announced his support for camila harris

michael pence has a special position in the american power structure. this means that many of trump's allies in the past period and those who supported trump in the 2016 election are not neutral today. george bush is a boy, but many elites think that he is greedy in the field of foreign policy, economic policy, and even security and cabinet models that can make a weak cabinet. it will not be a cabinet that has a discourse, has an approach,

does not use duplicate people and seeks to to bring about a fundamental transformation in the fields of work, that is, the hope that mr. doctor mentioned in a way based on the change approach, i remember in the election debates. that barack obama 's strategy and policy was the policy of change , and when he came to work, his view was change policy , the view that camilla harris has , he wants to change the internal politics, the workers, the behavior patterns, and even the discourses in the atmosphere of the night debate. america's past. it was related to our morning

, there is this situation that camila harris was able to get a better position and the media reflected but the economic discussion means that those who had an economic view, they are inclined towards trump, it depends on whether it will happen in the future. is the field of foreign policy the priority of the people, or is the discussion related to the natural economy, in which the issue of two governments emphasized by kamila haris is a winning ticket to be able to turn many of the fringe groups of muslims against the arabs and even the critical jews. netanyahu's government should be attracted to its approaches. the

second point of the discussion about the end of the war is the combination of these two is natural, which will make the public opinion of america more towards itself, so to in terms of foreign policy, i think that camilla harris has this success, especially that today camilla paris has the de facto support of china and russia, that is, when putin and the leaders of china , if it is decided that trump or camilla harris will become the president, it is natural to feel they say that i am greedily asking for more constructive conditions and cooperation, mr. dr. sajapour, apart from the gaza issue. the american military withdrawal from afghanistan was again a point of discussion

, here kamel haris criticizes the negotiations that trump had with the taliban during his time, or from this perspective, trump regarding the withdrawal of the americans and the 85 billion dollar gift that he was talking about, the remaining items from the americans in afghanistan, was transferred to the wind . how much do you think the issue of afghanistan can be effective as a result of this election? i don't think it is very much because in general. the main and central issue is america's domestic issues, and foreign policy issues are the next level issues. the foreign policy that is brought up is because of the reflection and the so-called domestic problems, such as the gaza issue, which is mentioned in relation to a significant part of the forces of even the democratic party, who are very upset with the way of the zionist regime, the demonstrations that took place in the party convention

he was a democrat, the democratic party inside, especially the youth section, and its left-wing crime is much more connected with palestine, that is, the issues that are reflected inside , afghanistan is not a finished case, but gaza is now a special issue, because it is a part of the american population, especially as i said, the population young and left wing of the democratic party is very problematic, especially if we consider in a series of key states that are known as states. i will give a brief explanation of the so-called rotation of this important vote. in america, this set of 50 states is more or less about forty of them. it is characteristic that the texture of the voting structure and how to vote means their pattern is more or less characteristic

, for example, new york is a liberal state, the majority is for the democratic party. there is a so-called conservative state. 7 there are about seven or eight states that are rotating, that is, they are neither red, which is the symbol of the republican party , nor water, which is the symbol of the democratic party. for example, arab muslims in the state of michigan are very serious, so the gaza issue is part of this so-called vote, but in the case of afghanistan , it is mainly about a past decision, and of course harris is very firm and tand questioned trump's negotiation method in

the case of afghanistan, that is, in a government that was a so-called friend of america. the previous government of afghanistan bypassed it, you went directly to negotiate with the taliban , the taliban is like this and the situation that was created later in afghanistan. exploiting nitrogen and example , for example, this leader of north korea. to change you means on the psychological and sensitive point, but if you want the whole discussion, watch it in about two hours. so to speak, 90 minutes or 100 minutes, most of the internal issues of america and the way society is run. now

that we are talking about our foreign policy, you said that afghanistan is the end of the conflict, but on that side, russia and ukraine are also in conflict. how much effect can it have? the issue of russia and ukraine, and perhaps more importantly china, because the issue of china was such that both of them referred to it, because the main issue in what the united states presents as world leadership is the issue of china. who is rising as a global power and how to manage china issue is complicated for both. it is not a simple issue, the issue of russia and ukraine has a different nature than china, but again, it is very serious to express the view here that the republican party has a more or less ideological view on the democratic party, that is, they want russia to definitely fail

, and the defeat of russia is a term asking and twisting these, especially on the issue of ukraine and this mr. david nemoir, who is very polite, but at this time of the year. he used to say how do you want to solve it, tell me the way and the method, and trump really didn't have an answer in this regard, harris also

didn't have a formula for this matter in my opinion, and this of course, it goes back to the internal conflicts that exist inside the us congress, in this case, the so-called ukraine-russia case, something that happened and is very interesting, because you know we are in politics. we have fata and details at work. the discussion is related to putin and the so-called american elections. the general perception in america is that the russians prefer trump, but sir , they are discussing this so-called because they can deal with it, which means that it is easier to be ideologically strict and so-called. he doesn't like the democrats, but two weeks ago, mr. putin said that i like mrs. harris in this election some of the so-called story

has been changed in its factors, as trump mentioned that putin said that i support this, but the russian issue is a serious issue, the ukraine issue is serious, but i think that in the formula that gives none of them is clear in this field, it is very difficult to provide a solution. now, mr. doctor , it is predicted that something like the election will happen. 20 20 that bipolarity became very prominent and led to conflicts, will it also form in this period of elections? i know later that at this stage, trump wanted to take the risk of the previous period. at that time, trump felt that definite winner. when this certainty was created for him, the issue of defeat was an election shock for him and as a result, the policy he adopted was a policy of disrupting the equation of the game. today, trump knows that

his pattern of behavior has alienated many americans from him. it is true that trump is a structuralist in this issue , so he is a so-called "warrior" in order to show that he must be incompetent and put the american foreign policy in a weak position, just as he criticized obama's policies in iraq in the past period. the situation in the electoral field today america has this fear-mongering approach that is kind of boring.

this idea has always existed in the politics and behavioral pattern of americans, which makes an enemy a part of making a real possible enemy. no, part of making a friend may not be real, that is , the problem that exists is that it polarizes the environment in order to increase the electoral participation, to make the american society feel more threatened , but of course, this trump 2024 does not have the signs of trump 2024 at all.

it does not have the signs of general mobilization of the american society, a kind of discrediting has been formed in relation to it, and naturally, the election results in the final atmosphere, it will be certain that trump may not have that motivation to challenge. trump's approach was that he thought. he definitely won the election. many countries may have this feeling . when they have a wrong feeling, they don't want to accept the reality. want to with the fact that the shape. in this presidential election period, i am sure that no wall

will be created like in 2020, because because there is a kind of historical and structural experience, their view will be a competitive view, as they say, looking to the future. thank you very much, we have about two or three minutes , mr. dr. sajjadpour, now considering that biden withdrew, mrs. harris came and the media said that it was much more than expected. in general, up to this point, now that there are less than 8 weeks before the election, which one do you think will have a better chance to become the president ? now there are 8 weeks left until the election. 8 weeks is a long time in politics, so it is difficult to make any predictions because changes are possible. an incident happened when mr. doctor referred to the zionist regime last week

, mr. friedman columnist. new york times article he wrote very important that netanyahu is looking for trump's victory and he might create an incident in the middle east for the headache that haris and the so-called democratic team do not come to work, so 8 weeks is too long, but so far the second point i can say is that trump's intellectual and operational structure was based on the fact that the republican team is biden. he is a candidate and therefore all their energy was for him. now that building has collapsed and this debate clearly showed that trump is not ready for this. it is not ready. the third point is that harris was able to create an energy. inside america, money he is preparing a lot for giving voluntary help because of this kind of music.

it means that his character should be changed from a so-called side character to an independent character, but again we have to see what happens. thank you very much, mr. dr. sajjadpour, mr. dr. motaghi, thank you for your patience and the analysis you provided, and thank you for watching . have a good night. . in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, ladies and gentlemen, hello.

welcome to the world. today, i, hosni sadat shabiri , will accompany you in this program for about an hour. the iraqi traveler is the subject of the first case in the world today. tonight, i am asking for the message of iraq's election what was the title of the first destination of the president's foreign trip? investigating the dimensions of the zionist helicopter crash in rafah and the outskirts of the first presidential election debate in the united states, the subject of the case. the second and third slaves of today's world, but according to the custom of every night of today's world.