and addressed the issue that in the conditions of high tensions in west asia, securing the borders of the two countries is the first priority of iran and iraq, but in addition to economic and security issues, a political analyst said that the most important message of the iranian president's visit to iraq is to support the axis of resistance. . the most important message of the iranian president's visit to iraq is that iran's continued support of the axis of resistance in the new government, which another arab language expert says, is a sign of iran's fixed positions and principles of foreign policy. this trip emphasizes the position and fixed principles in the foreign policy of the islamic republic of iran. this trip was meant to be to be done by the late president of iran and despite

thank you very much for your participation in mr. safavi's special news interview tonight. let's talk about the point that mr. barzani emphasized during the visit of mr. barzani. it was mentioned that there was a security agreement, but the iraqi kurdistan side did not implement it. this agreement

is objectionable for various reasons, a good coordination was made in recent days, concrete coordination for the dismantling of terrorist bases near the border and extradition. that person to iran, who is one of the famous terrorists anyway, this greeting and this good response , this good message that came to iran from iraqi kurdistan, met with a warm response from iran. you see, since the iraqi kurdistan referendum was held in 2001, relations between iran and iraqi kurdistan have not been good, neither at the level of governance nor at the level of public opinion, but now with this interview of maybe 30 seconds , mr. dr. mezikian has played a

very important role in the kurdish language. and there has been a positive impact on the public opinion of kurds towards iran and the presence of mr. dr. mezikian himself in parts of kurdistan for the first time. after the occupation of iraq by the united states, an official at the level of the presidency visited iran. an official from iraqi kurdistan says that this is important, so this back and forth has a good message in improving the level of cooperation and implementing the agreements that existed . mr. ghazmini, you are with us on the phone . different media of the world, i would like to ask you a question, in addition to strengthening cooperation in various fields that we

we mentioned it in the studio, and of course it has had various reflections in the world's media, which is said to have a great impact the importance of this trip was on the resistance front and the support of the islamic republic of iran to the axis of resistance . iraq now, regardless of the topic, in any case, the important historical relations, especially in the last 20 years between tehran and baghdad, is a symbolic situation and a message to the region and especially to iraq, so the friends in the ministry of foreign affairs have pointed out that it is definitely a message. mr. president's visit, not only mr. president , is actually a message of sovereignty and the message of the islamic republic of iran to the region and to iraq,

that the relations between the islamic republic of iran, baghdad and the area after mr. raisi, the late mr. raisi. in fact, the 13th government is not going to be pleased with the developments and the same rational and conventional foreign policy of the islamic republic of iran regarding iraq and the axis of resistance will continue. there were concerns in my area after the martyrdom of mr. the head of some television media in iraq, especially in the kurdistan region , called me and expressed that the relations between iran and iraq, baghdad and the axis of resistance are falling and that they are worried about this matter, but in my opinion, with this trip of mr. the title of a boss

however, the reality is that some countries are worried that a reformist president is now in power in iran. supporting iraq as the axis of resistance and getting closer to the islamic republic of iran will continue to be a continuation and stability for the countries of the region. thank you very much, mr. qazini. i will say goodbye to you. 5 minutes until the end of the conversation, 2 minutes and 30 seconds at the disposal of mr. al-ishaq, and please mention the topic. what do you mean, the islamic republic of iran is next to its competitors in the iraqi market, so what does it need to solve the challenges now? let's give two minutes and 30 seconds for the end, mr. it should be said that a series of operational matters , that is, in order for the spirit of business and economic development

to be formed, is also related to the government and governance, including these, laying the groundwork for the presence of iranian activists and contractors. in investment. participation in the tenders and auctions of an iraqi government requires a support. above all , iran's economic diplomacy, that is , iran's economic diplomacy, must pay attention to the fact that the main focus of work should be on the economy, and this requires the acceptance of a series of costs, that is, our government. our government is for that the government should advance this goal in its diplomacy. if it does not accept these costs, it is not acceptable. now, this is related to the issue of transportation , it is in the issue of customs, in all cases, the government should be the summary of those government duties, and in another place, the issue of lawsuits, and

finally, in the practice of economics, these lawsuits will be supported. lawsuits should also be helped by the judicial branch of the private sector, as i said, the quality of the goods is the type of goods. the most important thing is that the commitments that he has made are correct, that is, the product that he produces should be a competitive product. both iraqis should think of each other's benefit. if both active iranian businessmen and iraqis think of joint benefits , see mr. safavi 1 minute and 30 seconds ago. in the past few thousand years, the main problem of the iranian plateau has been reaching the mediterranean waters. whenever the connection was established, the security and economy of the iranian people was ensured. currently, it plays a pivotal role in connecting iran and iraq. a few months

ago, we had a meeting with mr. assoudani, and he said that the iraqi government supports the rail connection and the eastern corridor. western passenger and goods of iran to iraq and from iraq to mediterranean, this opportunity should be used well . the first point is our next challenge with the iraqi government , the 1975 agreement, which anyway, the iranian and iraqi governments must determine the task to revive and recognize the 1975 agreement, and the last point has been resolved.

in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the world. today, in the first case of tonight's program , we will host mr. ali samadzadeh, a security and international relations researcher, to review the grand narrative of the al-aqsa storm after 11 months of battle . see also in the second case. let's look at the first debate between trump and harris in the united states, which was announced by only 25%

americans will watch it in this regard, and in this regard , we will have the author and member of the libertarian party of america, mr. michael raktenwalalt, with me, but on the 34th day of the genocidal war and resistance in gaza, as always, i will start the program with the latest images and developments in palestine. let us make all the people to go to the schools and the palace of the schools and the martyrs, including the children and the women, that is, the people and the souls. the arab world

, the islamic world, the name of those who are intimidated by the fear of children, is not able to talk about oppressed children . wamarmin means martyrs. there is a large volume like us, you are happy, there is nadi shabab al-breij, it is in jame and under the rozah in al badram, and in mustasaf and abu hamaseh alli schools . the magnitude of al-damar al-kabir is this.

balrouh baldem labsik or asaha.

as i said, tonight the host is mr. ali samadzadeh , a security and international relations researcher. we will be there to review the story of the 11-month battle of storm al-aqsa. mr. samadzadeh, hello, welcome to the world. today, i am at your service. i say hello and thank you for giving me this opportunity. thank you for accepting our invitation. today, we passed the 34th day of this war , it lasted beyond the expectations of many. this war, and the way it is now considered the longest war in the history of the zionist regime , we had many incidents from the

beginning. incidents that had never happened in our region in west asia, from the many assassinations that the zionist regime carried out in lebanon, syria, iran, and sometimes even iraq , led at one stage to sadiq's next operation, and then he opened it again. and the food continued , we witnessed other fronts of resistance in these 11 months, we have seen inconclusive negotiations taking place in the region. in these 11 months, resolutions were generally vetoed, or even if the united states considered them non-binding, and practically, the security council and that global structure could not play any role in this regard. and finally , with the assassination of martyr haniyeh in tehran , we witnessed the escalation of tensions to a level that

we had never witnessed in the previous situation. we can see that the outlook for stopping and ending it is not evident at least, and in this situation, i am one i saw a note published a few days ago jointly by the heads of the 30 heads of the us central intelligence agency and the british foreign intelligence service's mic. their words were that the world order has not been under such a threat since the cold war. as for the first question, how big a story can we have of this whole scene that includes most of the facts of this scene. in the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, i would like to tell you that for almost 10 years, we have witnessed the strengthening and increasing power of the powers in the middle of the hemisphere. we are from the east a term used in international relations

thinkers and experts use the fact that power from the west is desiring the east. this has created many challenges for the americans , the main challenge is that the unipolar system that the americans created for themselves after the collapse of the soviet union and they are promoting a kind of unilateralism in the international system with the strengthening of countries like china. russia and in the regional arena of the islamic republic faced serious challenges , these repeated reports of the americans in the field of threats to their international sphere, which they publish every year , are aware of this and refer to these issues. in such a situation, the americans have been trying to contain the doctrine of the east for the past 10 years and try to assert that the east belongs to iran, china, and russia

. considering their presidents in different eras , it doesn't matter which one of the factions they belong to , having this commitment, one of the factors that caused, for example , the americans to actually withdraw from afghanistan , was the doctrine of containment of the east, because the americans wanted to contain russia. navin and the chinese need to shift their focus from the west asian region to specifically. take them out and use this power to contain china and actually russia, that is , the battle of al-ahsab storm and what started was not in the design and plan of the americans, they wanted to focus their attention elsewhere, exactly the same. now , if you allow me, another important point. what happened in the middle of this is that, according to the americans themselves, since 2015, due to

the major events in the region of the islamic republic. and was able to achieve unexpected successes in positive and negative cases , turning the islamic republic into an undisputed power in the region. it became many experts may say that the power of regionalization requires that there is a wide economic power, but in any case , this happened to the islamic republic despite the challenges and problems of internal politics or the economic field that we had in the case of the amun region. we did very well and created files. in particular , we managed our investigations and our secret cases in such a way that we became an undisputed regional power. did you mention what cases we have done until then? especially for our own benefit. finally, if it's for you and the viewers, this is that in 2011, we

faced the phenomenon of islamic awakening, or as the westerners call it, the arab spring. changes were happening very quickly. the countries witnessed a kind of surprise, but in 2015, many of these cases were concluded, and the case that was important for the axis of resistance and the islamic republic was the case of syria. in 2015, with the initiative of sepah hajj qassem soleimani, we were able to provide an operational coalition in the syrian environment and let's turn the page in syria and completely disappoint the other party from the collapse of the syrian political system . of course, the war continued until 2019. but in fact it was the stage of liberation. the isis case was almost completely closed in 2018. in a tense period of four years. these

were the successes that happened to the islamic republic because of all the efforts made by the western front, even the arab countries were with them, weapons, property , whatever kind of things those groups needed to receive and take in syria. now i'm the truth because because of the time of the program. does not allow to enter i won't go into details, but the next case was the case of yemen , where the islamic republic was able to take measures in support of the government of sana'a, which despite about 8 years of continuous operations by a large coalition led by the united states and centered on saudi arabia, at a cost of more than 400 billion dollars. the report of the americans will not be a success on the yemen front for the saudis and for the americans. the result is actually the result of his maturation in the behavior of the government of sana'a during

the past months in the al-aqsa storm operation, but let's go one step further, well, we became a regional power in 2015, this is what the american they say that it is not our claim, the problem is right here. unfortunately, almost 9 years have passed since this, that is, in the minds of the country's top officials in various fields, among the elites and among the people of the islamic republic, it does not recognize itself as a regional power , while its enemies and look at iran from the outside exactly like that, mr. hashem zadegan, let's go a little further and see what happened. we became a regional power in 2015 when the americans wanted to leave the west asian region and focus on containing china first and then russia.

their plan in the west asia region was to provide a kind of sovereignty and superiority for the zionist regime by reducing their own presence in the region, a case that during the trump administration was called the deal of the century and later the case of normalization or the peace of ibrahim and after that the normalization of relations the arab countries followed during the biden period were all within the framework of this strategic plan that by reducing the american military presence in the region, this role would be given to the zionist regime, and despite the fact that the countries may have differences in various fields, by taking concessions, the case of normalization their own relationships face with in fact, the americans are giving their place to the zionist regime in the management of the regional scene, the americans have also prepared the ground , especially in the political sense, exactly the same. in such a situation, the islamic republic became a regional power, and

at the same time, well, everyone thinks that means all the questions were that, well, this normalization is happening and the axis of resistance that the islamic republic claims to be in command and centrality cannot take a major action, in fact, in this period of time, we have a major stoppage, that is, an incident. greatness the first action of the palestinians in 20 21, an outstanding and big action that caused a lot of concern in tel aviv and washington. during the two years of continuous operations carried out by the zionists in the west bank with the help of the americans, it can be said that their concerns were resolved , that is, they felt that this was not established and that the superiority of the israelis in their own environment. in fact , it has gained consolidation and started to do things that will prepare the ground for this military sovereignty of the us and the israelis in the region. one of the big and outstanding steps

is to find the transfer of the domain in the military domain in the region, which means that there is no need even to normalize with some countries. the face for example, let's assume that the qataris, who are at the main air base in centcom, did not do the normalization. however, due to the fact that the zionist regime became a member of sandcom, now the advisors of the zionist regime are present at the military installations of sandcom in doha, qatar. it completely confused the americans and israelis and their plans, the al-aqsa storm operation was the al-aqsa storm operation.

its outstanding feature is that this event is completely it is palestinian, if we do not consider the field of support , training and separate these categories from the actual operation , which was provided by the islamic republic and members of the resistance axis in the past years, the decision-making and the zero hour operation is a palestinian operation, well after 75 years of occupation of the palestinians. they reached a point where they were able to carry out a strategic intelligence surprise against the regime. i have sovereignty in the region, and now the americans are not. i'm sorry, it means actually the countries of the region that was supposed to be with the departure of the americans , they accepted the sovereignty of the zionists. today, their problem was that they do not have the ability to defend themselves, and

they even declare it publicly. they say that we need help . this recent visit of the foreign ministers of england and france to the zionist regime. a few weeks ago , the foreign minister of the zionist regime publicly asked them to create a plan to defend us, but they did not even agree to do so implicitly. if they accept this, then there are huge costs, but the point is that the zionists could not play the role that the americans had planned for them. perform this model of the regional security model has completely collapsed for the americans. since the beginning of the al-aqsa storm, the americans have been widely talking about what we should do with the regional model after this operation. it is withdrawing its forces from the region in order to contain china and russia and the doctrine of containment of the east, which means that the us itself needs to withdraw, but the zionist regime needs the opposite. this is

exactly the case. so the americans started to create a political game. what was this political game? this political game was that they themselves show your body against the war. for the past 11 months, the americans have been constantly talking about the fact that we want a ceasefire. but when you look at the operational support of the americans in the region, you see that it has been published since the beginning of the al-aqsa storm based on the reports that the pentagon itself is publishing. 500 logistics planes unloaded cargo and more than 18. the logistics of ammunition have been unloaded. according to experts, about 50,000 tons of ammunition have been delivered to the shaheen regime since the beginning of the open war. the report of military sources is that about 83,000 tons of ammunition were used in the operation. as you know, this is not consistent with military logic at all. you have used 83,000 tons of ammunition in 365 square kilometers in the gaza strip, that is, for every square kilometer

, give me a figure, because when we want to talk about liberation through political negotiations. let's talk, in fact , we are saying that we chose the political path , the military path, you will not get results from the beginning, if you remember, the mainstream media was trying to say that no, the americans do not like this model, and the americans have another version that the zionists do not follow this version and for example this government netanyahu, who is only making killings , is acting contrary to the opinion of, for example, the american and the biden government

.