[000:00:00;00] it could be effective to have a strong supporter in the negotiation process, both with the europeans and in the five plus one process. perhaps this political distance could at least bring the islamic republic of iran into the negotiations from a position of weakness. in my opinion, domestic international pressure could be a completion of a complete puzzle that will go together. it can affect the conclusion of the long-term understanding that iran and russia want to achieve, and the negotiation atmosphere that iran wants to pursue with western governments in the 14th government. the islamic republic of the 14th government, in my opinion , one of the scenarios that these media created was that the 14th government is in

a position of weakness. this is

what was done with this development of relations in the future negotiations with the westerners, that in fact, by creating tactics and disrupting the relations between iran and russia, in a way , in a way, in a way, in a way, in a direction that they can actually lead in the future negotiations and there is a possibility that iran will have a deal with the west to lift the sanctions and have bad agreements. in fact, by breaking some kind of material, i can actually have a negative effect on iran's positions and if we look at it from this point of view, the trip of mr. ahmadian to russia and the achievements of this trip are very important to the negotiations that he had with mr. putin, because the most important axis is actually the media

and propaganda attacks in the last two weeks . recently, berel, the head of the european union's foreign policy, has also suggested that we are considering strengthening the sanctions against the islamic republic of iran. this analysis led to the fact that the increase of these sanctions, whether against iran, against russia, or against other countries, is actually forming a sanctions club. it means that even some of their interpretations of brics is that brics is a sanctions club in the world that gathers together and acts in the direction of neutralizing sanctions. indeed, the increase of these sanctions can embarrass itself. see, i will say one thing first. then i will answer your question, how many years

was it in the law? a few specific clauses are published in the announcement section, which is very interesting. i was studying this law. one clause , for which a budget of about 300 million dollars has been defined for one year , is to create challenges in the relations between iran and russia. this new law has a penalty of about 300 million dollars to create a challenge in the relations between iran and china , there is another clause, about 600 million dollars, it says to create a challenge in the relations between iran and its neighboring countries , well, see, this is only limited to our neighbor russia , which is not, now in the last one month, you can see with the media flow. which mainly

launched voice of america, bbc question and international, etc. afghani-phobia and iraq-phobia, and i don't know , talk about pakistan and many other issues in iran's neighborhood. it is now the turn of our so-called northern neighbor, russia, to make a false statement as an introduction, after all, this money must be spent somewhere, what about these anti-revolutionary terrorist groups outside the country , who killed a 46-year-old man in iran? the west is either in canada or in the united states, so these budgets have to be there somehow . spending money in the field of media and in the field of public opinion, so to speak , is where these funds are spent the most. this is the first point. take a minute to look at the second part that you said. these sanctions have caused

an introversion because we are not only sanctioned. you know that china will be sanctioned, russia will be sanctioned, iran will be sanctioned, any country in the world that does not want to be under the full ticket of america, the west and nato should be sanctioned. every day , the number of these sanctions is increasing, so what will happen to these sanctions in the future? these sanctions cause internalization, these internalizations cause a series of internalizations, and these internalizations lead to a series of new cooperations mayare, one of these new structures in the world today in the field of economy is growing day by day, alhamdulillah . they don't have you see, these space constructions were done during the preliminary meeting of that summit, none of this is a coincidence, i mean, i want dear viewers to pay attention to the fact that when

it is going to be one of the battle arenas, the minds of people are another arena. let's fight for the virtual cyber space of manbad, we will witness these creations . we have less than 30 minutes. one minute is to talk about the de-dollarization between the brics members and how much will it be to replace swift with a mechanism like brixpy for bank and money transfers. it is possible and how effective it can be in lifting the sanctions. let me first say something very important. see, in less than a month , we have a meeting of brixo leaders in kazan. we should take this very seriously , which means that this should be the most important priority of our foreign policy apparatus. fragile anti-sanctions organization . he has been opening the hand of our diplomat in every negotiation in different political, security, and social dimensions. now mr. lavrov has invited mr. araghchi to moscow. i hope this trip will take place soon and the level of contact of our diplomatic apparatus

in the government will increase as much as possible. more with the russian government, that's all it resolves the type of misunderstanding that arises. in the current situation, we see that the european union has taken a deeply anti-iranian approach, and european terrorists have taken a deep approach. he is anti-iranian and is rapidly increasing the sanctions . we must strengthen our cooperation with russia . we must not make the mistake of going down the path of distancing ourselves. he says that we are in a common coalition with each other . these sentences are extremely worrying for westerners . you see, the word "vaje" is extremely important, now two. the world power, the two effective members of the security council, russia and

china, are saying that we have a joint alliance , so that the west can be established in iran, but we have not been able to throughout history. we are not one-sided, either to the west or to the east to get our interests. this is a very detailed discussion. please accept my summary . i hope that the 14th government will follow this path to maximize the interests of the nation and the system of the islamic republic of iran in continuing to look to the east. may the west be successful . thank you very much, mr. korsan, mr. modbar

. thank you to my other guests who participated in tonight's analysis, and good night to you who watched. in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the world today. in the first case of tonight's program , we will examine the plan of the united states and nato to help ukraine to fire a long-range missile into russia, and in this regard , we will host mr. oliver bodet, a writer and university professor from ohio, in the second case, with a kind of camp mark, a professor at the royal university. melbourne , we will deal with the suppression of protests by supporters of palestine in australia. finally , we will take a look at the debate between trump and harris in america, which

was announced by only 25% of americans . in this regard, with mr. michael we will discuss the author and member of the libertarian party of america. but as always , we start the program with the latest developments and images related to palestine , which today marked the 34th day of genocide and resistance. these people are bad people living in the city

, who are you, or are you a girl, or a girl, or a girl, and i am going to a house? wakhoti beninah toba toba beninah. hajar by hajar, fjai lak

, now in the street

allah tainting water, second, bird floors of bomb buildings. i am so honored, she was someone who traded stories and we just can't stand it anymore. we get up every day, wonder occupied, besieged, tyrannized peoples and

lands. we start our first case and conversation. after the us and its nato allies said they were considering helping ukraine fire long-range missiles into russia. in response, russian president putin declared that such an action

means the declaration of war by these countries against russia. before the conversation, we see a report. in his interview, the president of russia said that ukraine is not able to use these missiles, so nato soldiers should come to its aid, and we consider this as the entry of nato member countries into war with russia. the key is that

nato's entry into the war against russia will change the nature of the conflict. with this headline putin's warning to the west. this is while british and american officials, as the main actors of nato, have not been able to explicitly agree to the use of long-range weapons. speak out against russia. this is the latest press interview of the president of the united states. will you lift restrictions on the use of long-range weapons by ukraine? we are now working on. the words can be seen in the press interview of the us secretary of state during his trip to ukraine. we have addressed the issue of long-range missiles, among other topics, and i will take the highlights of this conversation to washington to present to the president.

this winter, the war between russia and ukraine will be three years old. western countries, especially america and england they always warned ukraine about their weapons against the establishment. we have the writer and professor from ohio with us. hello in the last case of the developments of the war in eastern europe, we see that the united states and the rest of its allies in nato may

take a new step in this war and help ukraine to target russia with long-range weapons, of course , this will be done with a reaction and threat. . the seriousness of the russian authorities was faced to the extent that putin understood this action of the west to mean nato's entry into a direct war with russia. he wanted accurate point and long-range weapons for targeting. russia should use it and be able to target the depth of russian soil. we have this week from the us state department, the us secretary of state. anthony blinkon, blaken, as well as the

british prime minister and david lammy, the british foreign secretary, and others have heard that it is possible. from the statements of these people in the media, it appears that they are on the verge of issuing permission and a green light to ukraine to use these statements against russia . on thursday, president putin directly reacted to these reports and said that such an attack on russia from the use of weapons on behalf of russia as a direct entry

of nato in the war. in fact, it will be the beginning of world war iii. we are still waiting to see if this intention to issue the green light for use. it shows that apparently only the british are in favor of using such weapons, including the

british base, to be used against russia, however , russia is sorry, the united states is against issuing permission for ukraine to use american atcoms missiles, the intervention and entry of the british or the use of american weapons. it is not so important for russia because the leaders have satellite capabilities , on the other hand, the ukrainians do not have the capability to use these weapons

. according to russia, russia is directly at war with nato. we can also ask whether these weapons can have any effect on have a battle scene or not? some say that these statements can definitely increase the casualties of the russian army , but. there is absolutely no possibility that the use of such weapons from the very beginning will be equal to the attacks of russia against ukraine by other british or atcom bases. americans with a small number are available to ukraine and in terms of amount. and the quantity is also limited, that's why

it is impossible to imagine that the damage that russia can do to russia with its own missile power , the ukrainians can do such a thing, mr. bode britt , in another development, we are faced with two double standards at the same time. we have seen the first one about iran, recently america, england, france. germany and the netherlands claimed that iran gave russia 200 short-range missiles, even claiming that the reason for this was that russia's stockpiles were running out. these 200 missiles are vital for russia, of course , iran has officially rejected these claims and declared that western countries should support the peace talks and the end of the war like iran itself, however , the west itself

has provided more than 400 billion dollars in military aid to kiev. is the position we are facing two very serious sides that we are facing in this international conflict, in particular, one of the sides that you mentioned in your question is talking about the very extensive aid of the west to ukraine, which is given to one of the sides. war means ukraine will be given, and these

western claims are stupid and regrettable that iran wants to have and iran has refused to accept such a request . the problem is that washington and nato claimed that russia and its weapons stockpiles are running out. first of all, we should know that ukrainians are actually facing this problem themselves

, in fact, with shortages and depletion. they are facing each other, and america and nato, with all their efforts , could not meet the needs of the ukrainians in the battle scene, and even compete with the russians in this regard. i say maybe. you bought from a country like iran because of the war but such a thing, for example , is far from possible and likely for the russians to rely on

a country to advance the war in ukraine. abusing these accusations to call for sanctions to be imposed against iran as the national airline of the iranian people, while even in the long statement of the american government, which has made numerous accusations , we do not see that iran has no role in the war between russia and ukraine. yes, but from above, he faces a double standard we are that genocide. there, only the us government has given israel 50,000 tons of weapons in the past year, and part of these weapons have been sent via 500 american planes. just yesterday , it was announced that the us government agreed to send new weapons to israel worth 164 million dollars. what do you think about america's different approach in the gaza war? not only

is there no sanction against israel's genocide, but the war machine of the world crises that we are currently witnessing is nato and russia. from actually in the war between ukraine and russia from ukraine as a puppet for they are using it to confront russia, and on the other hand , we are witnessing extensive actions by israel . what the international court pointed out and was very important is the declaration of the genocide of the palestinian people in

gaza and of course in the west bank. currently , both of these two issues are widely intertwined, and part of president putin's reaction to sending aid to ukraine, putin said that if you do something like this, we will react in a specific way, and one of the our ways of reacting. be sure that at present a major part of