may god's mercy be upon his pure soul and his comrades , god willing, the late seyyed hassan nasrallah was one of the political veterans of the islamic world, and i left from the beginning of his work. i always paid special attention to his behavior , of course, he was one of the students and children of hazrat imam's school, especially in the doctrine of resistance. the doctrine of resistance was a doctrine that imam put forward and mainly had two very basic principles. one is that the misfortune of the islamic world, but the whole world,

is caused by the control of arrogant people. they do not let good governments do their work, let the people do their business, their economy goes on, they loot, they loot, so this is we will not be successful until we cure this disease, and the second basis was that the arrogant are afraid of the weak. we must put aside this cowardice. we should know that no matter how many cannons, guns and force they have, we will succeed if we resist. these two are the basis of the doctrine's thinking. hazrat imam was, well, on this basis, the movement of the so-called resistance started, the position of the supreme leader, may god protect him, to be fair, to cultivate this doctrine well , now seyyed hassan nasrallah was one of the prominent students of the school. it grew geographically

and covered a much larger area than the vast intellectual area of ​​the islamic world geographically, those who believe in the doctrine of resistance may be muslim, live in switzerland or america, but they believe in this doctrine. well , in such an atmosphere, he was able to play a very clear and constructive role and help this prosperity in other parts of the islamic world . therefore, first of all, he is a very distinguished character, intelligent, sincere, brave and very emotional. those who are closely familiar with him know that emotional means adam was so strong in front of his enemies who were very

bloodthirsty and bloodthirsty about ordinary life issues and people's issues, and of course he was very emotional. he was smart and had a very beautiful expression. god had given him many perfections and he was able to make a great impact on his role and his services. for the doctrine of resistance, liberating the islamic world from the yoke of arrogance, especially zionist arrogance, which today is a scourge to humanity, was a very irreplaceable role, and of course, god willing, their place will be filled, but not easily , they will never be forgotten. it is that he is a teacher. there is a whole shiite resistance movement

, but inside lebanon and even outside of lebanon, his fans and enthusiasts are only shiites. not only the sunnis but also the christians have a lot of interest in him and i believe that he was very respected inside the occupied territories and even among the jews as well when he spoke . the trust in his words was not comparable to the trust in the words of the zionist leaders, so he had a very important position in the region and the world, that is, he was a very distinguished person. we will have the messenger of god, maybe we will start this discussion from another point, if you agree. i think it is a very good question

a frequent question that i get asked a lot in the places i go is what happened all of a sudden . it was almost as easy to hit the great generals one after the other and make them martyrs . in general, this is like a magic key that fell into the hands of the zionist regime, while they say, for example , that they were able to get rid of these bunker bombs. what is the difference between the situation of hezbollah in lebanon and hamas in gaza ? how could it not hit the leaders of gaza in their bases ? he couldn't beat their large numbers, he couldn't

tame their leaders and beat them this year, how could he kill everyone so easily here, well, this is a very key question, what happened? some people say , for example, that the sist regime used artificial intelligence . these are, in my opinion, stupid tricks . now, i am not the type to consider artificial intelligence worthless, but this is not a key that can open any lock. for example, i said that we have something , it is not the magic of these things, the key is that from 2006 onwards. the zionist regime seeks to infiltrate the system hizbollah fell and had various bridgeheads , that is, i want to say that very important information protection errors were found inside hizbollah's organization

. this did not happen in hamas . since the hamas organization was smaller, it was easier to limit it. because now the question is that if the sekinist regime was able to penetrate hezbollah so much, one of the accusations that netanyahu is facing now is the fact-finding committee that they are waiting to deal with after the end of this conflict. our concern is that hamas is preparing for the october 7 operation and the storm and failure. yes, yes, yes, it is not the case that someone who succeeds in one place will succeed everywhere. in 2006, when the great defeat of the zionist regime in lebanon was the result of this case , they also had influence in hamas, but they invested extensively in hezbollah, of course, this project was mainly american. see, for example

, the pagers project happened . in less than 24 hours , they injured a significant number of cadres for at least two or three weeks, and then the important leaders of hezbollah. they assassinated one after another, attacked the meeting place where seyyed hassan nasrallah, may god's mercy be upon him, was. it was clear that they had extensive information. this is not the case with artificial intelligence . artificial intelligence allows you to make many assessments, but without your leads, you cannot go anywhere, and even i will give you an example, when the place where the so-called killing of seyyed hassan nasrallah,

may god's mercy be upon him, was done. they were searching and removing debris, until they reached his blessed body, within 2 minutes, the spokesman of the zionist regime announced that he was killed and his body was found. i mean, even in that investigation program, there was one person who gave them the news faster than in other places , so this is our fault, of course, they are preventing it now , it is not like this can always happen . i want you to tell me where hezbollah is going. . this was a weak point that was found in the system, an intrusion point, and this caused the second operation to happen. this is not the way it will continue. now, i want to draw another conclusion, that conclusion is that hezbollah

does not have a so-called star structure. connecting everyone to one person was one of the things that made this place a solid structure in the form of flexible cells, but work together harmoniously. just like every cell in the field, so that the person in charge of that department can show his presentation and he is allowed to do anything, sir, he didn't have a framework to work, this important power gave hezbollah the opportunity to quickly heal his wounds, and i want to make a prediction like this, that is, if someone asks, what will happen to hezbollah from now on?

if he is lying, he should know that it is a lie . if he is telling the truth, let him know that he is very wrong . these murders that we are witnessing today are arbede is not looking at the reality. in the near future, hizbollah will regain its previous strength because it closes the line of influence. okay, now that you have talked about terror, let's leave the discussion. how to discuss the reason for this popular assassination, which we are now getting to, but since at this point, your excellency pointed out that influence was the cause of this issue and this incident , i want to bring forward the doubts and words that are raised in the society or in the virtual space. your excellency , please answer these doubts. one of the issues that are raised is that they suggest that the islamic republic of iran made a deal for the martyrdom of mr. hassan nasrallah. and basically this is the beginning of a change of strategy in the policies of the islamic republic of iran towards the resistance front. what is your answer to this question, mr. doctor

? see, this is a propaganda to destroy iran and show that iran is not a reliable believer. and don't rely on iran as they say the front of the resistance fronts, iran's continuous policy has been and continues to be a substantial and substantial defense against the resistance. seyyed hassan nasrallah was the dearest force of the nation and the officials of the system. what were we looking for in our deal? we were not looking for novelty. we have a doctrine one of the great flagbearers of this doctrine, sasrullah, wanted to set foot in the world. how do we deal with it? so this is one of those doubts to weaken. regarding the situation of the islamic republic, i want to say this, in any case, this phenomenon has never been seen in east-west asia

and here in our country for several centuries, who can speak out against the policies of arrogant countries in the region. for the first time, it has been found that we can disrupt their plans. we can stop their excesses, we can stop them from becoming greedy. well, this phenomenon is natural it is a very painful phenomenon for america and england, and this is israel, which is nothing, the zionist regime is a small part of the big project of zionism, it is a small part of it, and the project of zionism is a very intermediate project at the world level, so i want to say that this meaning has nothing to do with us in no case.

we did not fail to defend the so-called resistance movements. now you see, some people may say very harsh formulas in order to discredit iran, for example, they say that something happened, iranians, why didn't they enter? look, if we entered, they would say that it would not be in the interest of the resistance movement. iran they are fighting, it is not our building anymore. that we open up the country, of course, we support them exactly , we also provide military support, we also provide political material, as the gentleman once said about yemen, when they say that you are giving arms to yemen, he says that we will certainly give arms, but now we cannot give them the way. well, we are not ashamed at all in supporting the resistance, but this does not mean that if something happens, we have to send troops, this is not the type of resistance, but

we help in every way, what does it mean that our advisers are on the list of martyrs? it means we want these empower them. they put themselves on their heels, not for us to fight for them. well, one of the other issues that are raised about why this happened is that the zionist regime definitely prioritized the assassination of a person like mr. nasrallah, but he did not commit it. for various reasons, and definitely in this operation , he made a complete cost and benefit estimate , so to speak, he calculated how much his risk would be, and probably the benefit for him is higher than the estimated cost that he did this. what do you think is the analysis behind this story from the side of the zionist regime that takes this risk and danger? he agreed to do this and cross this red line so that we know the situation of the zionist regime. now they are creating a victorious and strong and domineering face of the zionist regime

. this is a so-called caricature of this regime. this regime exists at the lowest level of capability and security. no part of this regime is safe. once you see, in general , the security theory of the zionist regime has been based on deterrence and intimidation since its establishment. that is , because if you give me a sign and give me a kiss, i will brutally kill you. this to the term "terror equation", as an american writer recently wrote, this equation of terror is the basis of the zionist regime's theory of deterrence and security . well, fear instills fear. well, within 6 days , it neutralized all arab armies. no other army of arab countries

dares to tell the zionist regime. . this is exactly what the resistance is targeting, that is, the basis of the doctrine of the resistance is to leave cowards aside . as a result, what happened to this regime that no one dared to speak to, at any point, someone from iraq hits, someone hits from yemen, someone hits from syria, someone hits from lebanon. well, this means this regime is at its lowest level from security to deterrence capability, the fact is that he says that we are in an existential and existential war. he is right. he says that this existence was a struggle. it means that the work has been cut to the bone . this is what it means. it is dangerous that, mr. doctor , the point that you are pointing out is that

the situation that this regime is facing now is a regime that is on the verge of destruction . i say that this diet did not have any harm. he said that i will disappear like this. they thought that they take the term of the rizvan commandos in the middle of the northern galilee, maybe they will release my golan . there is nothing to lose , in any case, no matter how much we win, we have won the equation . now, my question is, a regime that is placed at this level, which has practically nothing else to lose , how can it perform page operations at that level within the few days that we have passed. and then they made the secretary general of hezbollah of lebanon martyrdom . yes, i said this is not due to their military power

this military power that existed, where were these bombs , where were these planes , how could they not do this in gaza? it has been a year now that hamas fighters have been under this ground in the tunnel. it was the product of an infiltration operation that started in 2006, and this blow was inflicted by the lebanese hezbollah from this area, not from lahieh military. this infiltration caused a lot of lessons for us, that is, we must know that we are not only dealing with a military confrontation, infiltration can open the way in very sensitive areas, now an operation. nizami can reap the benefits, the reason is that they succeeded and how many of you

know the testimony of mr. nasrallah and the follower of the assassination of mr. haniyeh, that is, some of their analysis. it is that after the assassination of mr. hanigeh and the delay of the islamic republic of iran in asking for his blood that this incident did not actually happen in the field and nothing happened, it made the zionist regime feel that iran is apparently not a revenger and has taken a bigger action than you. do you agree with this analysis? see, this analysis has two parts, one is whether iran is really being violated by dealing with cases in which the rights of the islamic republic are violated. in addition, there are vital issues for our region . has it been found in the world? yes , it has been found. why has such an effect been found? one of

those effects is related to some of the words that we say inside, that is, the words that are said from within our government system. no, the westerners' perception of it is that somehow iran's policy is changing , while the respected president speaks very frankly and decisively in defense of hezbollah and the resistance front , maybe some others mean that this image is caused by there are some words that did not have enough accuracy and this was instigated and our enemies and our opponents were able to make this known , the american and scientific organizations themselves and in fact instill this into the policy of the islamic republic. there is no analysis in it, you see. a strong and resourceful system like

iran should not be considered as a calculated move. the mullahs have an argument. their argument is that they are saying that the americans are promising that negotiations are taking place that will eventually lead to a ceasefire. it is possible for iran not to take any action for the time being so that those negotiations will probably come to a conclusion and iran too he calls for a ceasefire and actually uses the definition of deception , which means the deception that the americans did to iranians and the islamic republic of iran in order to buy time and then see this happen. deception is common in their work. in the case of yemen , we had something like this when they declared that yemen is under siege. the islamic republic announced that i am leaving or i will hit you if you deal with me and i wish we would leave, but mr. john carrey called mr. zarif and said

, give me 24 hours, i will solve the problem in 24 hours and 48 hours. it took 10 10 years, so these are the deceptions of the deceivers , and yes, we may be deceived sometimes, but this is not a matter of deception. you see, for us, the issue of palestine and gaza is very important, and at the same time, their opinion is also important for us, that is, we do not want to replace the palestinians. let's decide for the yemenis , let's decide for hezbollah, let's decide for them, but we have our own opinions. now , if there is a basis for negotiations , for example, some works can have successful effects that our dear palestinians themselves say, it's not bad. wait a while and see what happens, of course it is reasonable. let's do the whole thing, but i believe that we shouldn't accept these words from the very beginning unless our palestinian friends have asked us to

wait for a few days and see if it will work. i think they are worse than these words, that is you. do you believe that what happened is because the islamic republic of iran has not taken any action to seek the blood of mr. haniyeh so far, this has caused israel to become more aggressive and to assassinate mr. nasrallah. their reading, their reading of this so-called behavior of iran and some different talks is that iran is coming to its senses a bit. and he wants to remove himself from these conflicts and not be too contaminated with the movements of the resistance front of this khan, 100 mistakes and we must make a mark on this, but this does not mean that we have to move.

good opportunity, they are looking for a significant goal and i believe that it will happen in the not too distant future that some people are talking about a tension trap. do you agree that the islamic republic of iran? because he does not want to enter into a war that mr. netanyahu arranged for them to bring the americans to the field, he will not actually enter this space. you accept the trap of tension. you see the trap of tension. it's easy for us to accept that we shouldn't do anything , that is, whenever we even express a part of our position , our rights are violated, and then we say that if we confront, tension will arise and we will go to war. we must always keep our swords out of sight in defense of our interests, that is to say, we believe in the islamic republic , we should never make any considerations about this matter, not that consideration should be done in the ninth breath

, we must be careful about what to do and when. let's give it, but because of the tension, if the tension rises, it will become a regional war. if, according to you, they call for war in defense of their rights in the name of god, this statement has been made officially, we are not afraid of a big war, because otherwise we have to listen to everything i said . it is not because if you do something , america will start burning the region, we will go to war, the corrupt regime will expand the war, this is smaller than the war will expand, it is trapped in a quagmire that cannot be saved from this. we do not hesitate to run away from this war if a war is imposed on us in order to protect our interests. we are defending our national interests. if we do, we will defend it decisively, so you criticize

the islamic republic of iran. the prize that happens in a tension trap is not that there is a delay in asking for blood from mr. haniyeh, this blood asking will never be done. we iranians have our own way. the work will be done, god willing, and now i want to say that beyond these, our support for the current of resistance is not for these, but suppose that it is a very important place. but our support for resistance movements, which is very broad, has been stable over the years it has continued from consultancy, to education , to military settings, to political settings, and this huge collection of our support has been going on there and is doing this one by one.

which cannot be compared, you should look at each part of the resistance and see which one of them lacked the support of the islamic republic, not the question of the deterrence that it should create, how much it was able to create, that is, the analysis i am talking about and the doubts that i suggest that if your assumption is true in, for example, the promise operation , if deterrence was created, for example, the assassination of mr. hani should not have happened if mr. hani's bloodlust happened. you see, the policy of terror is one of the most important current policies of the united states and the zionist regime. it can be found from the assumption that when you cannot enter the field and win, you try

to use influence, terror, etc. this has happened before now. it exists and continues, but the fact that our official guest was assassinated in our country requires a strong and decisive response from the islamic republic, which will surely come. i don't agree with its delay, but this is a military security decision, my political decision be political, i don't agree, but the decision is not only political, it has a security and military decision as well . giving in the region that they can't be our opponents , telling us that we actually have marketing, but our sword must always be out of niam. this is the advice of hazrat ali, peace be upon him, that if our sword

is in niam. know that it will cause a headache for us , that is, i want to say that the deterrence equations are unique action is not connected, deterrence is related to the flow of our work. our work flow is very calculated and strong, of course, it has weaknesses, like everywhere in the world, which country does not have weaknesses . the resistance and effective resistance will not disappear with these blows, it must be treated, strengthened, the wounds will heal, and i think the experience of the nations that are involved in the resistance is increasing day by day. yes, this is a war. in war, you don't always hit, sometimes you get killed, it's not like that