it has an internal crisis of legitimacy and it has not been able to solve its problem in these years. america has come behind it, the west has also come behind it. it is true that it is glamorous and i am not saying that now, for example, a country has been destroyed, but it has a crisis, it has internal contradictions, in any case, it is somewhere. there are many people who believe that you came by force, and my legitimacy has become a problem from the international point of view. this set of conditions has created security concerns for big countries, that is, the americans are worried about this achievement, which they have been showing this for all these years, it will disappear from i see it goes and i don't think it can be like this let it last, but in any case , they are under pressure now, that's why they are reacting to the al-aqsa storm , which now, even if you assume that it is the source , this reaction is not from this. but

there is another thing, well, you have to understand this, i think it shows who is the commander , that you pointed out that this wave that happened in the lap of the americans will finally wet rome. it seems that netanyahu will be much sooner than this. he wants this to happen , which means that he will bring america into this tension do you agree that netanyahu was looking for that tense story or not? he is definitely trying to save himself, that is, the crisis means he is running forward. in order to stay, netanyahu has to create a new story , but this is for the stage. it doesn't change now , except for what goals he has for him , he has a purpose, the united states has a purpose, the rest of us have a purpose, who is his command now, that is, netanyahu is really making decisions now.

they test all these things with the americans and coordinate them as soon as there is an incident there they are sending a ship to the area, so there is thinking that since the first day of the al-aqsa storm , they took over the command, so they keep announcing after every operation that we didn't know, or we only found out about the political jokes in the first few minutes. in this field, it is completely obvious that he is in command, so if you are in command, you must accept his responsibility. it can't be that a big big country comes , it creates a big crisis, and then with some kind of silly tricks, it wants to push the story in a different way. i imagine that until the americans they feel that their mischief continues , there is no cost to them, they will never create conditions of peace in the region. i

heard that one of the american officials in a region said that we will not allow an agreement to be made this simple. when do you think it will cost the americans if they want to establish peace? as if they themselves are instigating this. see, this area is not an area of ​​unconsciousness. when you come to israel, you see destructive weapons, they do this. and so they react to you, this reaction is natural it increases the contradiction. at one time, the americans thought that they would invade iraq and soon they would create a utopia for themselves there , they would create a new state. from the beginning, iran was saying that this is a wrong thing, you should not enter . we were hit by saddam, but this behavior is a new evil.

it means that it is clear now, and that's why i say that after some time, this curtain will fall and you will be on your own, just like the previous conflicts. you mentioned the issue of self-restraint. are these two months that mr. president mentioned that there were messages to exercise self-restraint until the ceasefire is established? maybe you know something about the bad faith of the americans and the westerners, they didn't want this to happen or they really couldn't provide these conditions, i know they can't. the dignity of this zionist regime is not at all such that it can't be done. i told america that they are in command. not wanting

to establish peace in the region means they still want this story to continue. and they think that in this way they can gain a stronger dominance in the region, because i know that political vigilance is very important in the region anyway, they came to iraq and now iraq is under their control. the people don't want to stay, they say go out , let's go out sooner. i'm sad that they are delaying . you behaved in such a way that this situation is also in syria, it is also in yemen, it is also in other places, it is even in countries like the arab countries of the region. he put pressure on

them, they are really happy because they are upset about this domination . naturally, people don't want to be under foreign domination, no country wants to. i do not understand this feature kenan, and i think that many of america's own opinion leaders say that we behaved wrongly in the middle east , but sometimes their material interests take over and continue the same wrong behavior. this wrong behavior itself has adverse effects. you and the people of the region have an unfavorable behavior. they don't have any reaction and that's why i don't think this issue will have a good fate for them. in general, do you think that the operation of sadegh devi's promise that happened brought us closer to the ceasefire and peace in this conflict or took us further away from it? i can't judge now.

because it is 50, in my opinion, the leadership of putting these things together, in my opinion, doing the right thing was ingenious. can you think wisely about this behavior that if they do this again, iran will surely respond, will it continue on this path, can they use this past experience to calm down the situation in this regard, iran will definitely accept this path , i have seen it, minister. our foreign ministry has also announced that we have a reasonable hope that the resistance forces in lebanon and gaza will accept our support . i think it's as simple as that, but we hope, that means we should be in favor of peace. war

is never a good thing for the region unless a person is forced to do it. there is always talk that the regime has nothing to lose, as you said. the end of this war, the end of netanyahu's political life , for someone who has nothing to lose, it is possible to predict any event and any incident . reasonable , but some other politicians in the regime the zionists have some wisdom to understand that this path is full for them. it is expensive, sometimes they comment, that is , not everyone is like this inside the zionist regime. i think that those politicians who have their own thoughts with any mental framework are thinking about whether,

for example, after a year with being involved in a group , for example, having an achievement, yes, we killed a lot of people and created a huge hatred. and in lebanon, where there are stronger elements , you are facing the same problems, but many other people are dying . what are your achievements in this matter? for example, what did you have in one year, now, for example, what is the prediction of their minds, at least they are thinking about this, we are not hoping for this. we think that in any country or at any time, these countries are not so-called official countries, they are very group, in any case , they are evil and evil, but in any case, there is classification and rationality in them, the words they say, they can

think, that's all. the absence of the americans is more important because they are the ones who give them orders, well, those who have experienced people, this is the analysis that the regime has been able to do so far. in any case , let mr. nasrallah be martyred and let mr. haniyeh be martyred a large number of hizbollah commanders were martyred last night in an operation near beirut airport, media and work, which is probably the place where mr. seyyed hashim safiuddin was present , that is, one by one, people who have a position in the command area in the hizbullah. god, they are working , maybe the analysis is that he is conquering these peaks one by one, according to his words, to reach one of the localities in hezbollah. do you think that this will not happen to hezbollah, without hesitation, these leaders are a loss. it means that it cannot be denied, but it must be seen if this damage is caused. they have the result is that they will disappear. this current will find resistance or resistance. this is the example that

today's leadership expressed in prayer, which was experienced in the islamic republic in the 1960s, anyway, when the blowing up of shahid beheshti and his friends was a big incident. the prime minister's explosion has also led to the martyrdom of friday imams. arriving or martyring a great person in one year , the situation is that the islamic republic really stopped, no, in my opinion, the conditions of the front changed after these martyrdoms, we found more victories in the front, the conditions of the administration of the country changed there is no analysis on the side of the siegristi regime. in your opinion, it can be attributed to these assassinations and these killings. that is their mistake, that is, imagination. they say that if the leaders do this, for example, this incident will end. i said that the movement of resistance

was formed on the basis of a belief, that is, mujahidat, and that when you make martyrs, you strengthen this aspect . now, hassan nasrallah's name may no longer exist. it was a shame, he was really a great character, but this trend cannot continue with more hatred and prejudice. it moves more. i will know later that it means having the right understanding if they don't hurt me so much for example, let's assume that some of our nuclear scientists assassinated us, for example, our nuclear problem stopped, not increased, that is, a lot of students from sharif university of technology came and said that we changed our major, we went to the main major, sir. some people say that what is happening in iran it happened in an established government, which is a country after all. hezbollah is a movement that has a country. it works, that is, this analogy, and maybe they don't know a lot of relevant analogies, that is,

they believe that you can test in places where there is no establishment . the generation of fighters would increase, which means that the revolution won because of the pressures, for example, the jhaleh square was bombed by the shah's regime at that time on the 17th. the incident became wider in tunisia, for example, the pressures increased and a crisis arose. i think that if someone wisely looks at the scene of history and learns from the events of this contemporary era, why don't they see that this is the divine tradition of those who are on the right path. they don't get this, their eyes and cover are closed, they don't see the events accurately. yes, i agree

what you are saying is that the strategy of the zionist regime is to assassinate the leaders. they think, for example , to assassinate haniyeh, mr. sanwar was successful. he is a very powerful person from a military point of view. now , for example, what has changed? the soldiers who were assassinated, replaced and the principle of your youth about the resistance front, mr. doctor, well, in terms of the media and the atmosphere that exists in the world , there were always many words and hadiths about the shia crescent issue that they raised and that this resistance front what is the purpose of the leadership of the islamic republic of iran and this influence that has happened? it will be beneficial for iran, these issues are like this, the point that the supreme leader of the revolution pointed out, that in order to maintain independence from afghanistan to yemen , from iran to ghazni and lebanon , we need

to tighten the belts. what is the closing of this belt? is it the way we look at the reality of the situation in the region now? are other countries coming to look at the problem from the same perspective or do you think it is because of the dependencies that exist in terms of the considerations that every he can still have a country for himself. the look is the same look which is moving towards the normalization of relations with the political regime , it is moving towards establishing relations with the occupying regime, so perhaps i should explain one point first, that this is the discussion of the resistance forces. for example, get points, we don't need that. that is, it is not really. this is one of those misunderstandings that arise. that is, for example, if we iraqi people helped them to stand against isis, we paid for

this because isis was a serious terrorist group. they also created an american, as you saw, they announced it themselves. stone throwing is from him iran really helped the people of iraq, they once came to take mosul and the rest took rome. well , the americans were in need, they just gave orders and did not do anything, but iran immediately came and helped them , so iran is playing a responsible role in regional security, that is. for us, regional security is really an important issue, if the region is important, we can live comfortably, we can have the right intentions, that's why the issue of cooperation with the countries of the region has been revised, relations are being corrected, sometimes there are misunderstandings. i have to fix this

i think that in the last few years, good efforts have been made to resolve some of the disputes with the countries of the region . we cannot say that all the countries of the region do not have the same strategic frameworks in various issues as ours. we have common economic interests, we have common political interests, and they also have some experiences . i don't want to mention the name of that country. one of the top officials had a meeting with me when i was in the parliament. he established a very close relationship because they are part of it they are considered the poles of america, he said yes, i said why did you do this because i had given them one of their islands

, i said why did you do this, he said because we have no confidence in america. we have to work with them because we have no choice, but we came and made a mane like this. this is one of the countries that works completely with america , and i give them orders. i was in charge of dealing with them. i am not saying that it is possible to do this easily, but there is an awakening of the region. the same countries that work with america have a concern in their hearts, so they are ready to give in under the burden of force, they want to have another side, but this will not happen easily . it is for both the nations and the resistance forces

. there are resistance forces in all these countries. they must have a clear analysis mind and be ready to solve this problem. first, they must know the main problem well and then know how they can face this. in fact, their friends are dependent on each other it is not a problem to find this because the resistance forces have shared this literature for a long time , they will find each other soon. regarding the governments , they agree that the governments are still doing this with fear and trembling, of course, with the dishonor that they have found towards the zionist regime . the fact is that

americans dream up different plans for the middle east every day, from the deal of the century to the middle east, and they even name the operation they are doing as the journal order. with this the awakening that we mentioned, your excellency. if this conflict finally ends in favor of the resistance front , do you think that we should still wait for such plans and crises in the form of these plans that they name in khabarmian region. please note that the issues that are currently in the international scene are not only this conflict. you can correct when you can. analyze and see rome's other live conflicts, for example, the ukraine issue is a serious issue that i found between russia and the west . it is an extremely active issue. that is, maybe in some ways more active than the same case in some ways, like the westerners do russia have a special sensitivity, or the negative competition that

the americans have with china, that is an active force, in fact, it is international, the heavy competition they have in the issues of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence , this is a new story, i mean, the international scene is just a case. where can these cases help each other, and are these separate things at all, or are they actually overlapping? i think that if the issue of this region comes to a point where rationality prevails in the region, now or cease fire. let there be an agreement or solve this issue by force. other issues internationals find extraordinary conditions. then they will use this capacity of the region . this means that the conditions of the countries in the region are increasing

, not decreasing. the governments that are not very interested in resistance today, one day when these issues are resolved, the level of these countries will rise because other conflicts will be highlighted. those they will need these countries in the region , this is their concern, and your analysis of the position of the countries in the region and the european countries is the duty of the united states , which you have specified, but the european countries and the countries in the region are in this situation of the region. what is your analysis? some people seem to be just observers, some people only condemn the side of the resistance front, and they do not see what is happening in gaza and lebanon as a whole . how do we analyze the european countries, of course, as you said, most of the time , especially these important countries, you have seen them with the united states in the security council, they usually

repeat what he says in the case of israel , but some european countries are not like that , of course, they are very influential. they are not, but in any case, except the european union and speak with more consideration i hit with a more measured behavior. they have and sometimes they even talk about the fact that the palestinian people should not be under so much pressure. small but important countries. but it should be noted that the european union has lost its positive role in solving problems in the region. sometimes it has a destructive role. the weapon sent to collide with each other does not have a proof role. he wants to have it and he doesn't have it. he must want to have it, because he brought it to them, but they don't have it, that means no, they have a good reason for this. once they were the leaders of the colonialists in the region

, now they are not there, they have other things to do next to america. they are appointed for a job, but the main role is played by the americans, that is, in the case of iraq, for example , when they come to fight with saddam, the main role is the americans. these other countries also came and said that we are partners, of course, later they regretted it. some of them first said that we are not partners, then they said no , we apologize . but really, this way means i am not a problem solver. for example, they were negotiating, then i said, "let's see, let's talk with the others." they want to talk to the main boss, they make a deal, he wants to make a deal

, that's why they ca n't succeed. for example, some of these european countries actually have a history in lebanon. they don't allow the americans to solve this, that means they don't allow them, of course, i believe that in the future, china will play a more important role in the region . he does, so he finds a role to the same extent as me, now go i won't tell them the basis of their own policy, for example, the same thing we say, but in any case , the russians will play a bigger role . in your opinion, yes,

they have not wanted to use it for days. we haven't seen anything from them, i think they have much more capacity than this and one of my important issues is that the countries that have the capacity should have a more real presence in the region . they have security records, china is a powerful country from the economic point of view, and it has its own conflicts.

i hope tonight's discussion has been useful for you . good night and god.

it's going on, news of the sunset, those who are steadfast in every faith, we are the imam of independence, the role of our lives, the martyrs wrapped in the ears of time, the cry of pan -tainde mani and jabdar of the islamic republic.

in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, o allah, peace and blessings be upon muhammad and the family of muhammad, and hasten their fate, in the presence of you viewers. respected and honorable, hello, good morning . stay with us on the news section at 6 o'clock . covered extensively. many of the world's leading television networks, including cn, bbc, sky news, al jazeera, al-mayadeen and al-manar , cut their regular programs, according to the commander-in-chief's statements.