we will continue, but i believe that we should talk carefully with the people and our society . it doesn't apply to them, not that we don't want to support them, we have to talk honestly with the audience, but what i want to say is that

it is being implemented regarding the minimum wage, what do you think ? from this issue that now you can see it this way, at least this law that was defined in the proportionalization will definitely not have that much social meaning in the social security department of the ministry. there are several reasons. one of the reasons

is that in social security, more than 70% of retirees are on the minimum wage. in my law, it is clearly stated that other than the minimum wage, it means that zero number will not be added to these people. well, this is one of the problems that mr. dear dr. godarzi, you said that at least proportionality was implemented, which means that this kind of thing is going on now. at least take us 7 million and 160 thousand tomans there is a discussion going down. article 10 and 11 have come to minimize people whose retirement is less than the minimum. this is a discussion . people's expectation is that there is a difference between inflation. that is, you have announced an inflation rate every year. the central bank has administered an increase in salary , a lot of talk, a distance.

we want to increase this gap under the title of proportionality . you did not give this 70% of the society a single rial. the second problem is that now this law has been implemented. didn't you know that different degrees have been created, even the same people who are receiving them now? to find a problem with that formula means that it is not acceptable to that formula at all, its conditions are one of the second arguments that it was not implemented on time, maybe if it had been implemented, there would have been a lot less problems, or the third issue is the issue that you want, these two points that you raised mr. dr. zangin, the next body's answer is no, then they said, i will say one million, then i will say, look, one million was paid on account of the government for whatever reasons. the social security pension collection

, well, many people's salaries are 2 million or 3 million it was 7 million, this is 1 million, and now receiving it means an expectation has been created for them. this is a problem. there is a discrimination between the fund now for government funds for 6 months and for the social security fund for 3 months. this has caused dissatisfaction and protest from the side. if he wants to implement proportionality now, it is the demand of the people. the second problem is that the bill sent by the government came to the conclusion that at least 10% should be given to each of these retirees. unfortunately, the parliament is refusing to do so on the announcement of the collection and the proposal on the floor of my parliament. this figure it was looked at, if you excuse me, the support installment, what kind of support is this, what is the main issue, the main point of the discussion was this.

sir , there is no proportionality between the employee's salary and the pensioner's salary. what does this law say? it says that the employee of your same level will get as much as you should get within 3 years. within 3 years , what does it say about social security? i can say the first words of mr. doctor a little easier. he says, sir, you retired this year, and you will receive your last salary today. 3 times at least, this three times at least should be preserved for the rest of your life. yes, half of it should be preserved. now, this is the point what my friends are saying is, sir, at least tell me that nothing will be added. well, there is no problem. if we raise the minimum salary of the workers, then of course the salary of the person who

retired with the minimum salary should also be raised. that is another discussion. i mean, now this law is called proportional law. making now this law has not come to solve all the problems of the people , that the salaries of the dear minimum wage earners and even the salaries of others do not rise with inflation . we agree that these salaries can it answer the inflation ? people's livelihood is in difficulty now. we agree that it is another discussion. this discussion was that i, who am retired, should not get 5 tomans. i will get 8 tomans later. shakli, who is equal to me, should get 15 tomans

, he should get 14 tomans. this law has come to fill this gap , the social security justices that mr. asadi said does not include 70 social security communities, and what is the reason for this law? i will be very clear, the reason is that the reason the problem is not in the law, the problem is in the social security system. why do we have to pay the minimum to 70% of our workers? does the person who received the minimum in the first year not get a base? at the very least, mr. dr.

dolat should be rejected, instead of going to implement the law let them sit down and make an interpretation that we should come to those who get less. let's give to those who get more, let's not see or give less , this is not called proportionality anymore . let's do it. we also support in the parliament. we are at the service of our friends. mr. doctor, let me tell you that the letter written by the government does not support your statement at all. look, the government wrote a letter to the parliament saying that it has made two proposals. the first proposal is this. that the amendment in the previous bill should be made in that law to

remove these non-minimum wage earners, then it says that no retiree should have an increase of less than 10% .

the law came so that the one who has received 3 times the minimum on the day of retirement, according to my brother's interpretation , does not get three times as much as time passes, this law is for him

in the name of god, whose memory is peaceful and whose hearts are peaceful. dear and respected viewers, hello to the world. welcome today, i am vahid modareszadeh, with a review of the most important news and developments in the world, especially in the middle east i will be at your service tonight. first, the developments in lebanon and palestine according to the picture.

yela assab khed nawal khedallah

al-mayadeen tv channel, citing the media of the zionist regime, reported in an urgent news that the officials of this first anniversary of the al-aqsa storm operation sat on the exit of farin afarz magazine. its author is one. it is written that the joint operation room of the resistance in

gaza showed how wrong it is for the zionist collective to be from the southern borders and the resistance is tied. the idf leadership lost credibility almost overnight. barnia, a prominent zionist analyst, says the same thing. damages entered into israel in the first hour of the attack cannot be compensated. on that day, the zionist regime launched an air attack on gaza to get out of the shock of the hasty evacuation, and less than a year later, it launched an attack on lebanon. and with all this, the zionists living in the north and south of the occupied territories still cannot return to their homes. 611 people do not feel safe in israel. this figure reaches 71 in the north. the majority do not trust the military to provide security. 86% are not ready

to return to the settlements in the gaza strip after the war, and only 27% think that israel won the war, but the majority. they say after a year of war, they do not feel victorious. israel today is weaker than ever. all our borders were broken. society is collapsing from within. according to zionist analysts, the gaza war not only did not unify, but deepened the social and political divisions of this regime. netanyahu, who was known as mr. security until a year ago, is now mr. surprise among zionists. the zionist leaders take a victory pose, but according to these data, everything has changed. the zionists will not return to the days before the 7th of october and the al-aqsa storm operation. i am talking about this issue with mr. elif sasak

analysts of political issues who are with us from al-jalil. mr. sabakh, hello to you. a year since the storm. and the al-aqsa operation is going on when the prime minister of the zionist regime promised to destroy hamas by returning the prisoners. now, after a year, what is your analysis? how are the conditions in the field? is there a difference between hamas and their capabilities compared to the beginning of the al-aqsa storm? it is highly destructive, and in this regard, america supports it with full and absolute support, and of course all arab countries support it, and even some

arab countries support the regime . ability destructive capabilities and telecommunications capabilities of the regime, in fact, thanks to these capabilities, the regime was able to inflict damage on hamas, but it was unable to inflict great damage on the resistance and on a large scale, and for this reason, it turned to civilians and civilian facilities. to pressure the military and political commanders of the resistance. to apply his opinion in this way and he did this in the gaza strip and he is doing the same in lebanon. anyone who observes this war knows well that we are witnessing a genocide, and not a war between two armies or between governments, but a different kind of genocide.

we are soldiers, the target too. in the gaza strip , it is quite clear that either death or migration is the option and proposition that the zionist regime has placed on the palestinians, or death or migration, but the palestinian nation has persisted and insisted on its positions and preferred to die, and in this regard more than approx. in fact, a thousand people were martyred with those who remained under the rubble, and many were injured and many lost their lives, and more than 100,000 people were injured who reached the hospitals, in addition to those who did not go to the hospitals yet. and they were not actually registered

their names and besides, many fell sick due to lack of food. we can see that against the zionist regime, therefore, in terms of the military equation, israel failed in achieving its goals in the strip. they are talking about gaza and also in lebanon, the settlement of nishan was unable to return the settlers to the northern areas and return them to the occupied areas. in fact

, this means a hard failure, a failure in which it was also unable to defeat the resistance, and therefore the failure in gaza and the failure suffered in lebanon, and for this reason, the regime is trying to kill civilians in a heinous way. it is like many fascist regimes do what they do to civilians, and this is a sign of terrorism . in short, there is such an equation . do you think the continuation of the war, do you think

he will return the prisoners with military operations, as has happened in the past, he can only do this with dialogue and with evaluation and with actually with the equation but with agreement. the battle is not limited to the exchange of prisoners or their release, but it goes beyond this. netanyahu is looking for this rather than the horizon in the first few days, istanyahu has set a very distant goal in the middle east region, and they should also announce that they are aiming to achieve their goals at the regional level.

west asia to live alone and to dominate it and the zionists to dominate it, for this reason, based on netanyahu's religious concept , he is of the opinion that he can apply the cobra to israel on earth, and this superstition is based on these are the teachings of the zionists. he wants to put this superstition into practice.

to the assassinations that took place, moses behind them it was supposed to include the martyrdom of ismail haniyeh, but israel has not been able to respond quickly to iran, and it has not been able to, and it has remained in its threats and has not been able to carry out its threats. witness again today. there was a martyrdom operation in the west bank, considering that you are also a resident of the west bank , what is your opinion about this situation, or this series of

martyrdom operations. could it be a spark for bigger actions? this operation is limited in its impact because we are fighting a regional war we are in the middle east and it is not like a war is a civil and local war. that's why to you. i would like to ask whether these operations will be serial and chain-like. the answer is no, because the zionist regime has a security force here in the west bank that cooperates with israel to suppress the palestinians and has the capabilities to use it in this regard. therefore, no one can prevent israel's actions in this matter , and this is important. i don't want to say

that the strength of the resistance axis in these small operations is not big, but the strength of the resistance axis is that take his capabilities and this initiative and defeat israel and this will make the islamic ummah happy and it is the resistance that caused the settlers to move from their homes. and they flee and we see millions of them in such conditions, the same ones who displaced the palestinians were displaced themselves today, and because of this , israel has suffered great losses in terms of military and its military forces and materially. it happened in connection with the 2006 operation attack in

wadi. if he gives it, the same disaster will happen to it and surely the answer but i must say that this war is a war of attrition against israel and they had a great impact on israel's economy. i emphasize that israel has suffered a lot of damage , a quarter of the country's budget has been damaged and spent on this war a quarter of the budget of this regime has been spent on war. and this regime

is in trouble because of the insanity it has suffered and its self-righteousness. i would like to thank you very much, mr. alif sasak, the analyst of political issues, who was with us from al-jalil. i am also grateful to my respected colleague, mr. shujaei they were in charge of translating this conversation , but four people were martyred and several were injured in the israeli airstrike on beitlahia area in the north of the gaza strip. in the extreme north of the gaza strip

, the residents of this area are facing a shortage of drinking water, food and medical facilities. we are now in the kamal adwan hospital in northern gaza where the zionist regime committed a brutal massacre in beitlahiya area in the northern gaza strip. so that the planes of this regime targeted a number of civilians. the martyrdom of at least 4 people resulted. paramedics are transporting the wounded from there are different areas north of gaza. but what is of interest now is the action of the zionist regime army to encircle the northern areas of the gaza strip in a general way. therefore, no one has the possibility to move from this area to gaza city, which is two kilometers away from us. we are under a great siege and with a lack of basic needs such as food and reputation.