as always thank you for joining us for i am armstrong williams. emily atkins is with the washington herald and ryan lovelace is with the examiner. i want to lay out something for you and i want you to explain. because in some ways you are doing the wrong thing for the right reason. so this is the theme of the segments. a part of it, you are doing the wrong thing for the right reasons. i want to go to bundy's, claimed bundy. and the standoff, he is not compares himself to rosa park. he is saying that he is more discriminated against then black lives matter. and i said to myself, really? and then i asked myself a couple years ago when his father and a group of ranchers were involved in that standoff

efforts up this question, what is the reaction from the federal government had been different had those ranchers had been minorities:summary after the question, are stuck with it have been different if they had been black? and you know, sometimes you just don't want to answer. because they are asking legitimate questions. so i want to talk about bundy for a few minutes because he is worthy of some national attention but i will start with you. >> i think that is a lot of questions of other people are asking, the difference in the reaction from this standoff from other protest by black life matters or others with really dramatic. the government sort of seated >> and we are talking about the government. keep that in mind. >> with this occupation go on for quite an amount of time. and i get a lot of people thought in baltimore, if black lives matter had occupied a federal government building it

and there are legitimate questions there as to how these people are being treated. not just by the governments but by others, presidential candidates. if you remember the clyde bundy the presidential candidates talk to him, stand next to him. to talk about the tyranny of the government until he started saying some controversial things and then everybody blacked off. >> about jews and minorities. and now the gop presidential candidates have been thrust into being critical across this critique. can he compare himself to rosa parks: >> you know, i personally don't see the comparison. >> armstrong: but he does. >> and he does.>> armstrong: what about the issue, ryan. the federal government there was a fire that took place, the fires went to government property. they were scheduled to go to jail and they stepped in and said, we have not sentence you long enough we are going to add

of bizarre, talk about that speed and that is the thing that is controversial. >> armstrong: very controversial. >> ryan: and it will continue to be something how these different presidential candidates respond because in the past these candidates have rushed out like kim davis that do spark a lot of controversy. and that is something that is important to keep in mind about why this is different from black lives matter.is the setting. >> armstrong: it is different because these people are armed. they are carrying. >> ryan: right, right and the setting is different too. because the media's ability to carry is different. because in st. louis, the ferguson area there is much easier access for media to be there and everyone was talking to the area. in rural oregon they are trying to bring in the show and not having cell service there are different challenges there which i think are skewed some of the media's coverage of the event.

completely different set of circumstances outside of what typically is taking place there that is changing how people are looking at the event, to. >> armstrong: but if the color skin was different with the cover they categorized them and the governments reaction towards them would it be different? >> ryan: i think there is a strong argument to be say that there would. >> armstrong: but why? i sympathize with the fundies and the gunn's and the mann's, they are breaking the law there should be no tolerance for that. but for my reason for the right reason. >> emily: and this goes to what devises terrorism and other things. we have had people who are armed, they are in a standoff with the government. if that was a different group of people they could have labeled it terrorists. >> armstrong: but their arms are legal. they have legal to carry. >> emily: and for the occupation of a federal building is not. >> armstrong: that is true that is where you draw the

>> emily: and given their treatment i think a lot of people say >> armstrong: many people believe in we go texas that the government blew up the building. >> emily: and they do. >> armstrong: and they were not minorities. >> emily: and that speaks to the distressed of government about these young people why these religion groups of existed for so long and are still powerful enough and armed enough to take a federal building. >> armstrong: last friday in south carolina, i want to continue this on a different topic. emotional moments, said solemnly in a auditorium in south carolina. and the crowd started singing trump, trump, which was to escort her and others out as he was talking about syrian refugees. now she admitted that as she was being escorted out many people in the audience prprusely apologized to her for this kind of behavior. in assuming that she is a terrorist. and some people were yelling,

and you can see the woman and the she was what do we do in these instances:with every day people we see the good side of america and not judge it. but we see this other side which is a dangerous trait. wait a minute i have 30 seconds? let me come back i don't want to interrupt you. i really want to respond to this. because it really goes back to accepting this seemingly having in america. that is quite different you can see it, you can sense it, you can make it kind of soffit it presents itself up. what is it leading to:we will

>> you know america is a tinderbox. the government wants to take their guns they believe the government is terrorists. they believe the government is against them. and yet you are going to talk about the issue with the woman wearing the jihad who did nothing wrong. >> emily: and she didn't. >> armstrong: and i am sorry, but with security, i know all those people were checked before they entered the room. >> emily: and right, right. >> armstrong: they had secret service protection. >> emily: and i think this was a crowd mentality that she stood and the reaction from the crowd from doing that grew to the point that it led to her being escorted out. and i think that is what happens when you have a strong message with someone like

polls. he feels justified in doing that saying, look, americans agree with me. this is what they want. i think it is a little disturbing i think we don't want to polarize people and she just clearly was not a terrorist in any way. but she proved the point. that just people who see her might perceive it as such. and i think we need a discussion to show that a lot of people are not muslims, are peaceful people who are not trying. >> armstrong: but i got to tell you what we see that brazen, that brazen shooting at that police officer in philadelphia. and he said he did it in the name of isis. you see why people feel that way.

>> ryan: people have ever reason to be afraid. they have every reason to be scared but will people are also looking for is for people to control and console them so they understand that they have someone who is a strong leader who is not going to rush to judgment necessarily. but donald trump does have a plan for the dramatic. the saying you are fired, the slogan from his television show is all built into his persona. and what he is writing on print and i think that is going to be something that becomes very problematic for the gop going forward. and we saw they reach a whole new group of ads that reach audiences that don't to bluegill republican. they tried to reach new voters. and the question or not is that the new voters that donald trump are preaching are the same voters the gop want and need to win in 2016 and will change course from them for the last eight years p7 here is the

all this publicity, all this print, all this domination by candidate trump. >> armstrong: all over the world, and i don't the trump i have known him a long time. but you know none of us really don't think donald trump. too often he never does anything, he never gets into the substance. nobody asks in his values, what jason, into his background like ben carson and personal america. the question is do we really know who donald trump is? >> emily: and i think that is a good point. he is a message shape shifter. when a message seems to be good for his campaign he goes with it even if it contradicts other things. remember he initially said that we have to let in syrian refugees for these are people who have been persecuted. and so it was more advantageous to say no we have to get the refugees up at every muslim. so i think he is a good

>> armstrong: but do we know who he is: >> emily: and outside of the entertainment. >> armstrong: do we know? >> ryan: he appears on television so often everybody thinks they know him because he has been in their living room. i don't think people have an understanding of who this guy is beneath the surface. who has made him into who he is today. his background story hasn't then added yet which i think is interesting. i think a lot of it is his willingness to do media, television all the time, mass media, it has instant analysis on twitter every time something happens he is their right array talking about it. there is never a cause or time for people to then go into his background but he gives them what they want to hear, he gives the snappy, short soundbite that he does well drive conversation for days. the islamic woman who was thrown out of his rally will probably get more than the forum on poverty for the republicans, trying to fight poverty in america. that is one of the things

he has been so capable of taking over this 2016 race and driving the conversation on the republican side. >> armstrong: what is going on, what do you expect from the supreme court:*speaker11* and there is a lot.that is among the things still waiting to, the order by the president to sort of give a reprieve to some of the immigrants who are already here. give them work and focus elsewhere, that is one of the big issues. abortion is before the supreme court again, it is been years since the supreme court has taken on abortion and texas and a number of other states have hacked loss since then that really restrict access to that. so it is going to be two big issues coming up in an election year. >> armstrong: is it true that the end are two of the industrialized that don't have maternity leave from others. >> emily: and we are thoughts flexible than other western nations, hillary clinton has already been talking about it. i am sure we will hear more about that from her in an election year.

both sides, both republicans and democrats really need to appeal to women. and have both hillary clinton and a number of the gop candidates have had trouble appealing to them in the passive it will be a big issue. >> armstrong: mark romano i don't recognize him anymore. marco rubio who is usually reasonable and sensible, and was out to the far right. he has gone far right what is happened to rubio? >> ryan: i think we have seen him try to fit into a gop as a primary voter. he is not necessarily in the same mindset he was when he first arrived in the senate because now he is running in a very difficult primary, perhaps one of the most competitive in a long time certainly. before that his audience is different. so you are seeing all of these candidates try to tailor their message to who they think will show up for them and that is why you see them playing two different issues, highlighting different things. and i think that is what you

change he is looking for a different audience that he has in the past and florida. >> armstrong: quickly what are we going to get the gop back to four or five candidates a week and get a real debate. >> emily: and it may be a long time, march or even later before this all shakes out. because there are so many candidates. there are so many different candidates that appeal differently in places from iowa, south carolina, to florida. i think we really have to wait and see. it may not go all the way to the convention but if you go close. >> armstrong: i tell you what, it is certainly.

donald is a you know good news could be many different things for the president has signed an executive order and the good news is it doesn't mean anything. [laughter] and joining us to tell us why it doesn't mean much and it doesn't. is leon spears who is president

concealed carry, dc concealed carry.com. joining us but you don't have to agree with me i don't think it's initiation changes much. you are here to explain it. >> the president's executive actions had four parts. one, to keep america safe in the sense that there is an initiative by the white house to invest $500 million into healthcare, mental health acknowledgments. and so what you is prohibited from purchasing a firearm. local law enforcement will be notified. secondly, as technology for safe guns, safe guns he has implemented new changes in research and development for dod, the department of homeland security to actually research the smartphone technology. and thirdly, to keep communities safer.

respond to enforcing current laws on the books. and then lastly, specifically 24 hour access for nics checks, national instant background checks, 24/7 access, 365. >> armstrong: explain to us all the atf is going to respond differently than what we have seen them for works traditionally now it has been a backlog. so something like, for an charleston. the background did not come back in time. and that person was a prohibitive person, but the current federal law actually allowed him to receive a firearm because the time was allowed to receive a firearm had expired. so he was given a firearm even though his is wasn't actually complete.

export-oriented detail. how does that change from anything in the past? >> it is not so much explore deeper it is going to explore quicker. more efficiently, more effectively. >> armstrong: so what will change to make that happen? >> to hire more staff it will hire more than 200. >> armstrong: how long before the tiring take place? it is not going to take place immediately. when people hear that executive order they expected right away. but that doesn't happen. >> it is the expectation of the public. it would be remiss to say it is not going to happen overnight. but i wouldn't have an answer to that. >> armstrong: what is different about the technology now than what the president? >> well smart gun technology is very controversial. sometimes you have to have a watchband in close proximity to a firearm. technology is like stamping on actual ammunition.

controversial technologies. >> armstrong: we are interested in the mental health are you saying the latest from the president is going to stop people who have issues from mental health that people are aware of for them to have access to firearms? >> the key that you just had is there is no silver bullet. no pun intended it just happens to be you cannot stop crying. you can do the best that you can, just because you cannot stop all crime does not mean that you should try and prevent the smell of crime through local change in policies.>> armstrong: i know you are doing your best effort to get support and credibility with what the president is doing but i want to go back to my earlier statement. it is just a band-aid. >> i wouldn't say a band-aid. i would call it progress. >> armstrong: so you are

guns, innocent people being shot. it will be less of because it is going to take >> the word preventative. >> armstrong: delayed:slow down? stopped? what is the word? >> i would say thwarted in the sense that it would be ramped up in the sense that it might be curbed.

remember it might be and it jesus made two references to the word tribulation. we dealt with one of them last week when he said in john 16:33. he said, in me you will have peace. but in the world, you will have tribulation. he said he can but it me you will have peace, but in the

tribulation." the word world is the social order. so he was saying that tribulation, even though you are a christian, even though you are a believer, even though you have a relationship with god you are not exempt from the realities of human experience. love the minute of wisdom. you know it is true. in your life you are going to have tribulations. buckle down because it makes you who you are. i cannot thank you enough, what is the website for us again. >> dcconcealedweapons.com >> i want to thank all of those who came and for the production team that look good and make me sound good, nobody gets to where they are by myself and i want to wish them

them know how much i appreciate and look forward to 2016. amen. that is a wrap. [laughter] [music] >> armstrong, armstrong, armstrong. >> ( music ) >> in today^s world, production agriculture isn^t stand and talk, it^s work and do, hands on, implements down. whether it^s corn , soy beans, or wheat, succeeding in this business takes sharp management and an eye for detail. bringing tools for the production toolbox is farm journal college. let the

education begin. ( music ) >> welcome back to corn college, ken ferry joining us again today. ken, cover crops are getting to be a lot more popular. we^re seeing a lot more of them out there in the field, but there are challenges associated, depending on what kind of cover crop you^re using and what time of year, you need to be killing that off. let^s talk about planting, and if we^re going to plant a corn crop into a cover crop, what do we need to be thinking about? >> it probably starts clear back when you planted that cover crop, to think what effect does the cover crop have on the cash crop you^re going to plant, in this case corn. some of the cover crops, it^s not a big deal, such as our radishes and stuff like that, but some of the other ones, when we start talking about for instance, cereal rye, there^s an allelopathic toxin that that cereal rye will give off, especially after you kill it. >> okay, what does that mean, explain that. >> it means