this sunday, race and the president. at issue, president trump's comments disparaging immigrants from haiti and africa. democrats work quick to condemn. >> that's what he used this vile and vulgar comments, calling the nations they come from [ bleep ]. >> it was racist. it was inappropriate. it was crude and loathsome. >> it must be in his dna. >> republican reaction ranged from we don't remember him saying that to disappointment. >> very unfortunate, unhelpful. >> he should take them back. i disagree with them completely. >> to this -- >> i speak a little salty behind closed doors at times as well. >> was there just salty language? or did the president just reveal

his true feelings? i'll ask republican senator rand paul of kentucky and democratic senator michael bennet of colorado. plus, civil rights leader andrew young is offered olive branches to president trump in the past. what about now? ambassador young joins us this morning. and war games. why did hawaiians get a message that a ballistic missile threat was inbound? it wasn't a drill. it was a mistake. the dangers of instant communication in the nuclear age. joining me for insight and analysis are nbc news chief foreign affairs correspondent andrea mitchell, helene cooper, pentagon correspondent for the new york times, david brodie, host of "faith nation" on the christian broadcasting network, and msnbc political analyst elise jordan. welcome to sunday. it's "meet the press." >> announcer: from nbc news in washington, the longest running show in television show, this is

"meet the press" with chuck todd. >> good sunday morning. a week that began with president trump feeling he needed to prove he was mentally fit to handle his job, and ended with him facing charges that he's a racist. just asking that question is the president of the united states of america a racist, it is deeply uncomfortable. but it is an issue that is now being openly discussed. a measure of just how widespread the reaction has been to his s-hole comments about african countries can be seen in newspapers and editorial headlines around the country. issue is not whether president clinton u used salt y language, it is the sentiment behind the language. it left the president forced to hear, if not address, a very uncomfortable question. >> mr. president, are you a racist. >> ignoring questions at an mlk day on friday after railing against african immigrants from s-hole countries at a closed door immigration meeting,

suggesting that the u.s. should accept more people from places like norway. >> that's what he used his vile and vulgar comments, calling the nations they come from [ bleep ]. >> the president took to twitter with a vague partial denial saying his comments at the meeting were, quote, tough, this was not the language used. a source close to the president told nbc news, quote, he frequently uses that kind of language. "the new york times" reported last month in june the president told advisers that immigrants from haiti all have aids. and said that once they had seen the united states, nigerian immigrants would never go back to their huts. those comments in private should not be a surprise, given what the president has said in public. >> why aren't we letting people in from europe? i have many friends, many, many friends, and nobody wants to talk this, nobody wants to say it. >> mr. trump has a history of racially charged episodes that dates back more than four decades. in 1973, the justice department

sued mr. trump and his father for discriminating against african-american applicants for rental units. mr. trump re-entered national politics by leading the so-called birther movement. >> he gave a birth certificate. whether or not that was a real certificate because a lot of people question it, i certainly question it. >> he launched his presidential campaign on the idea that immigrants from mexico were rapists. >> they're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists and some, i assume, are good people. >> and insisted those who resisted white prem sifts and neo-nazis in charlottesville were equally to blame. >> you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. >> on friday, the reaction from republicans was muted, with most republican leaders declining to comment. two republican senators in the meeting put out a statement saying they do not recall the president saying these comments specifically. another, senator lindsey graham,

indirectly confirmed them, making it clear in a statement that following comments by the president, i said my peace directly to him. and some republicans did condemn the comments outright. >> totally inappropriate, he should apologize. >> first thing that came to my mind was very unfortunate, unhelpful. >> that is not the kind of statement the leader of the free world ought to make and he ought to be ashamd ed of himself. >> but some senate candidates who are nervous about trump's base in the primary defended the president. >> i speak a little salty behind closed doors at times as well and so i'm not going to throw the first tone on using any language. >> i've said all along, the president many times says what people are thinking. >> joining me from bowling green, kentucky, republican senator rand paul. senator paul, welcome back to "meet the press," sir. >> good morning. >> you know, during the campaign you lamented the fact that when you got into the race, you were doing things like speaking at howard, trying to show, expand

the tent of the republican party and try to beat back the stereotype about the republican party and you lamented at the time the language candidate trump has used. as president, when he's gone down these roads, you've actually pulled back and you've not gone after him for specific comments. you've hit him on policy, but not comments. where are you on this? >> you know, i don't think the comments were constructive at all. but i also think that to be fair we shouldn't draw conclusions that he didn't intend. i know personally about his feelings towards haiti and toward central america because when i was not a candidate for president, he wasn't a candidate for president, i went down there on a medical mission trip, did about 200 cataract surgeries and the same in central america and when we asked donald j. trump as a private citizen to support those troops, he was a large financial backer of both medical mission trips. i think it is unfair to draw conclusions from a remark that i think wasn't constructive as the least we can say and i think it

is unfair to all of a sudden, paint him, well, he's a racist, when i know for a fact he cares very deeply about the people in haiti because he helped to finance a trip, we were able to give vision back for 200 people in haiti. >> i guess, though, are you more disturbed though by the comment, it is less about the vulgarity and more that he seemed to say, why can't we have immigrants from norway as opposed from african countries? look, i tell you this, many nonwhite americans hear, oh, so he wants white people, not black people. >> right. but i think people jumped a little bit to a conclusion. let's take the whole scenario and put different words in and say we would rather have people from economically prosperous countries than economically deprived countries, or we realize that there are more problems in economically deprived countries, therefore there is a bigger impetus for them to want to come, then it wouldn't have been so controversial. what i can say is that if you do a poll, and one of the worldwide polling companies did this and

asked people in 50 countries, would you like to come to america, about 700 million would come next year, we would double our population. practically we're a great place and practically we have to eliminate. if you look at where they would rather come from, if you live in a very, very poor economically distressed country, you're more willing to come than if you're -- >> that's the story, right? >> say again? >> that's the story of our country. >> it is the story of our country, but what i'm saying is you can see why there are more people wanting to come from economically distressed areas and they can't all come. it gets into the valid legitimate debate over how do we choose, do we base it more on merit? there are a lot of questions that this ultimately intersects with policy, and the only thing i regret from all of this, other than i think some people in the media have gone completely bonkers with, you know, just ad homonym on the president, i want

to see an immigration compromise and you can't have an immigration compromise if everybody is out there calling the president a racist. they're actually destroying the setting and he's a little bit of it, but both sides are destroying the setting in which anything meaningful can happen on immigration. >> that's where i want to segue. you said the word merit. the president, this morning, in a tweet said i as president want people coming to our country who will help us become strong and great again, people coming in through a system based on merit. no more lotteries. define merit. i sit there, is merit political asylum, is merit running away from poverty? what is merit? that is the eye of the beholder word, sir. >> i think so. i think for a lot of it is intent to work and people who want to work and there are jobs of all different knowledge and skill levels, so, for example, ifware engineer, those are the kind of people that people say staple a green

card to their visa, that's easy. if you come here and you're not going to work, you have no merit. really what i would do is combine not only being selective, but i would have a very significant work and sponsorship. in the old days, maybe 100 years ago, when my wife's grandmother came here, you had to work. if you didn't work, you were in fear of being sent home. there needs to be a little bit of that tough love. so we select out for people who have strong work ethic and i would say, by the way, most immigrants who come here have maybe better work ethic than some of those who are already here. >> that's actually usually been the case when it comes to first generation immigrants. let me ask you something, you seem to say that democrats have to stop calling the president names. doesn't the president, though, owe an apology for some of this because, you know, look, nia love, the daughter of haitian immigrants, she wants an apology. and he hasn't issued one. >> there are two different standards here n 2013, lindsey

graham said the exact same thing the president did, but he used the word hell hole. we can't have everybody coming from every hell hole on the planet here. now everybody thinks lindsey graham is a great statesman, but he said almost the identical thing to the president in 2013. so i think we have a selective remembering and we have decided that -- and people have -- >> wait, wait, wait, wait. hasn't the president earned -- but, senator, hasn't the president earned this skepticism on his own? i mean, he's the one tweeting these -- >> he has often not helped his case, and i think if he were to further explain or try to explain, maybe not use such coarse language it wouldn't be this way. if we were to have a debate over whether or not we can have an open border with every economically deprived country that is a valid debate. and people are driven here by poverty, but we can't have an open border with everyone who wants to come. we end up having to have rules on our border and we have to be somewhat selective on who comes. i think there was a valid

argument in there, but you got sort of queen saltiness coming out and then i think people have misinterpreted that he's a racist. i can tell you, that when i went to haiti, and was doing a medical mission trip, he was very concerned about those in haiti and wanted to help them to restore their vision. >> i want to talk -- ask you where you are on the various compromises out there. i'll put up a quick graphic. the compromise bill in the senate, lindsey graham and dick durbin there, on the left. additional money for border security, citizenship for dreamers, dreamers' parents would be protected but no citizenship, diversity lottery ended but slots reallocated. can you support something like that or do you think that's too -- to open borders for your taste? >> i can support a compromise. and, in fact, i've been offering to the democrats a compromise for six months that they have turned their head and sniffed at and said, oh, no, we don't have to give up anything, we're going to get what we want. my compromise all along was, those who are here, the kids

that came here, parents brought them here illegally, we could internally immigrate them, just count them against the normal totals. so like next year a million people will come, and if you had 200,000 dreamer kids, have a million minus 200,000 come next year and count the 200,000 as part of the million that would have come anyway. and that way your immigration totals aren't going up, they're staying the same and internally immigrating people who are already here. i think that's a compromise. but the democrats have sort of sniffed at this and said, no, we want just, you know, our dreamer act without anything. but now i think the president has changed the dynamic. there is going to be the dreamers are going to get naturalized, but there is going to have to be something for border security and it has to be real and has to be significant because a lot of people, you know, going all the way back to '86, we doubt, people said border security it going to come later, it never comes. >> that is an argument we have heard for a long time. senator paul, i appreciate that. and it is going to be perfect timing because i'll get somebody from the other side of the aisle to respond to that.

appreciate you coming on and sharing your views, sir. from the other side of the aisle, who is a part of that bipartisan deal i just asked senator paul about, democratic senator michael bennet of colorado, who joins me from denver. welcome back to the show, sir. >> thanks for having me, chuck. >> i'll start where we just ended so that the viewer can feel it. you heard senator paul's response, avoiding taking a position on your compromise, offering up another version of a compromise, protecting the dreamers for straight up even more border security. i've heard a version of that before too, which is separate out all the other issues. you want to protect the dreamers, fine, let's do it, just for the wall. and some version of the fence. what do you say to that? >> what i say is that he ought to look at the compromise that dick durbin and lindsey graham and rest of us have reached because it is a combination of border security, $1.6 billion that the president asked for his

wall, additional $1.1 billion for border security, and at the same time we're saying that we should put the dreamers on a pathway to citizenship. there are other compromises as well. this was a hard fought negotiation over four months. i think that it is a middle of the road approach that i hope other colleagues will support. >> but it addresses immediate concern because, look, yes, you allocate an additional billion dollars to what was asked for by the president. but it is really a one-year, you know, his concern and i've heard this from others, no, allocate that border security money now so that they know it is there. >> we will allocate it now. we are allocating it now in the bill. i was part of the gang of eight that negotiated the immigration bill in the senate that got 68 votes, which if the house had ever put it on the floor would have passed and i think we wouldn't be in all this nonsense we're in right now. that bill, which was democrats and republicans together, the

first provisions of that bill were border security. i think we put $40 billion of border security in that bill, so this idea that somehow democrats aren't interested in border security is demonstrably false and we should stop talking about it and get on with it. >> a lot of democrats simply want to say, you know what, don't try to compromise, this should be a clean dream act, nothing else. let me play a few clips on that. >> what i was glad to see is that we are moving forward on getting a clean dream act. >> we need to pass a clean dream act. >> if you are a democrat who doesn't like a clean dream act, you are going to have some problems. and don't count on me to protect you. you're on your own with that. >> that last comment was the deputy chair of the democratic party, senator, saying essentially compromising on daca with border security is somehow a negative litmus test inside the democratic party.

what do you say to that? >> what i say is that, look, i'm for a clean dream act. i've been one of the first co-sponsors of the clean dream act. as i said earlier, the gang of eight immigration bill we passed earlier had a great dream act, but it also had border security. and i think it is a recognition that unfortunately the republicans have a majority in the house, the republicans have majority in the senate, and we have a republican president who doesn't seem to appreciate the contribution that immigrants make to this country. i think that the agreement that lindsey graham and dick durbin and the rest of us have reached is a principled compromise and i hope people will explore it. there should be more of that in washington, not less, in my view. >> a lot of democrats have come to the conclusion that the president is a racist after the previous comments and point to a series of things he has said over decades, not just as president. is that a fair conclusion? >> i was raised not to call people racist on the theory that it was hard for them to be rehabilitated once you said

that. but there is no question what he said was racist. there is no question what he said was un-american. and completely unmored from the facts. he seems to have this impression that immigrants to the united states, like my mom and her parents, who are polish jews who came here after the holocaust, somehow, you know, come to the united states and just are lazy and the truth is exactly the opposite. you spend any time in neighborhoods across colorado, what you find is immigrants here striving to make this country better, provide for their families, and for the next generation. so i think he has no idea what he's talking about and on the question of what is in his heart, do you have any idea -- any thought, chuck, that he would have called into question barack obama's birth certificate if barack obama were white? >> that's been an open question on that debate for a long time. let me ask you this about the view of working with president trump, in general. there are many democrats and i'm

sure you hear from that say stop, you're enabling them when you work with him, what do you say to that? >> this is a trying time in the country. i could never have imagined we would have elected donald trump or someone like donald trump president. and i still worry about what that says about where we are as a democratic republic. having said that, we need to work for the benefit of this country, its place in the world, for the next generation of americans. and this immigration compromise is a very good example of that. donald trump delineated four issues that he thought had to be dealt with in this immigration bill. daca, border security, what he calls chain migration, and diversity visas. those four things are dealt with in our bill because it is a recognition that he was elected president of the united states. but we still have an obligation to do the right thing for the country, and we'll continue to try to do that.

i think that it is incumbent on members of congress whether democrats or republicans to elevate the things that really make us special as a country, including our commitment to being a nation of immigrants, but also our commitment to the rule of law. and both of those things are at work in this compromise that we have made in the senate around immigration. >> you used some troubling words, these are trying times. and you worry we're not going to recover. that -- i don't want to say it is apocalyptic, that's too strong of a description. that's pretty demoralizing and so i guess the question is, you're an elected official, what is your obligation to do something about this? >> well, i think -- i think every elected official and frankly every american has an obligation to do something about this. we are a nation of immigrants. we are committed to the rule of law. the founding fathers, when they set this country up, knew they were setting up something that had never existed before in human history, which was a

democratic republic. we would be self-governing, and they knew as a definitional matter that we would have disagreements. and they set up a bunch of very elegant mechanisms for us to resolve those disagreements. and it is now up to our generation to decide whether we're going to destroy those mechanisms. where we are going to have unprincipled disagreements in washington that actually don't advance the interests of the american people or the interests of this republic or establish us as the example that we have set over generations making that republic more democratic over time when we're in a world where -- filled with sectarian violence, people can't get along with each other, whether we're going to set that example. america needs to be that example. so i'm not apocalyptic about it, but we have to take our obligations as citizens and as elected officials very seriously in this moment in our history, just as people have done at very important inflexion points

across the history of this country. >> before i let you go, we're shutting down the government of daca, if a daca compromise doesn't happen? >> i hope it doesn't come to that. >> it is worth it? it is potentially worth it? >> we -- it should not come to that. we should stop shutting this government down. we should start doing the work the american people sent us to washington to do. chuck, we have not passed a real budget for the ten years that i've been in the senate. >> i know, i know. >> we had 30 continuing resolutions. it is a joke. and places like china and iran and north korea are not waiting us to, you know, for us to figure out this contempt for politics that we're having. it is time to pull together as americans, as the sons and daughters of immigrants, and do what our parents and grandparents did for us. that's what we need to do for our kids. >> senator bennet, appreciate it. wish i could go further, but i'm running out of time. i appreciate you coming on and sharing your views.

later in the broadcast, the ballistic missile warning in hawaii yesterday, for something that was a mistake. why did so many people believe it felt so real? but up next, much more on president trump's comments on p trump's comments and this question -- are their experience is coveted. their leadership is instinctive. they're experts in things you haven't heard of - researchers of technologies that one day, you will. some call them the best of the best. some call them veterans. we call them our team.

it's ok that everyone ignores it's fine. drive. because i get a safe driving bonus check every six months i'm accident free. and i don't share it with mom! right, mom? righttt. safe driving bonus checks. only from allstate. switching to allstate is worth it. ♪ traders -- they're always looking for advantages. the smart ones look to fidelity to find them. we give you research and data-visualization tools to help identify potential opportunities. so, you can do it this way... or get everything you need to help capture investment ideas and make smarter trading decisions with fidelity for just $4.95 per online u.s. equity trade. fidelity. open an account today. ♪ open an account today. it can detect a threat using ai, and respond 60 times faster. it lets you know where your data lives, down to the very server. it keeps your insights from prying eyes, so they're used by no one else but you. it. is. the cloud.

the ibm cloud. the cloud that's designed for your data. ai ready. secure to the core. the ibm cloud is the cloud for business. yours. back now with the panel. helene cooper from "the new york times," elise jordan, andrea mitchell, and david brody from the christian broadcasting network. welcome. one of the reasons president trump's immigration comments landed with such force this week is because the president has a long history of making provocative statements on the subject of race. here's just a little sample. >> that a well-educated black person, male or female, has a tremendous advantage over a well-edge kaucated white person. why doesn't he show his birth

certificate? why aren't we letting people in from europe? a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states. i don't know anything about david duke, okay? you wouldn't want me to condemn a group that i know nothing about. look at my african-american over here. this judge is of mexican heritage. i'm building a wall. ausms, h african-americans, hispanics are living in hell because it's so dangerous. you walk down the street, you get shot. >> do you want to include the congressional black caucus and the congressional -- >> i would. you want to set up the meeting? do you want to set up the meeting? >> no, no, no. >> are they friends of yours? set up the meeting. get that son of a bitch off the field right now. out. he's fired. he's fired! >> some people would say i did a montage of dog whistles from the president. >> yeah. i feel like you just played that to wind me up. wow. this has been -- i mean, i think

this has been really sad in a lot of ways. i feel like we've crossed the point now as this country when you look at our image abroad internationally, this country has always been seen as a nation of immigrants, and i'm one of them, coming from liberia, which i guess would qualify for one of those african countries that president trump disparaged earlier last week. take president trump aside, because i think this is the sort of thing we expect from him, but what i find really upsetting about this is that for so many years i felt like i'm such a proud american. i feel very much like this is my country. but i also feel -- one of the reasons i've always felt proud is because this is a country where when my family left liberia when i was 14 years old, we could have gone anywhere, but

i would have never gotten to the point i've gotten in my life if we went somewhere other than the united states. i never would have become a "new york times" reporter. it would have been a whole lot harder if we went to europe or something like that. and that's always made me proud of this untri, that this is a country you can come to with nothing and make something of yourself. and i feel like we're starting to lose that, and i can't begin to describe just how upsetting that can be personally but just how much damage that can do to the united states around the world and how other people look at us. >> elise, you one time worked for rand paul, once a future presidential candidate, and this was a guy trying to symbolize his candidacy by showing up at howard, by talking about criminal justice reform. he was trying to get rid of the stereotype, yet senator rand paul there was trying to give president the benefit of the doubt still. why is that? >> i think that republicans are put in a terrible position right now of having hitched their

wagon with donald trump and then having to spend time cleaning up after his constant missteps. and in this case just completely -- language you cannot justify, and it is just not fitting for an american president to go out into the world and represent our country talking this way about other nations that we need as allies, that just for practical security reasons we need other -- we shouldn't unnecessarily antagonize an entire continent. and unfortunately, that's what donald trump was hellbent on doing this week. >> you know, i'm looking at this clip. you could say that he had me at the birth certificate. how much evidence do we need? and i'm not, you know, one to use labels, but it is so upsetting to all of us who come from families of immigrants, particularly people of color, to

children. and i was really struck by something -- well, first of all, paul ryan in the moment saying it was, you know, unfortunate and unhelpful and rand paul trying to make those excuses today. republican leaders and other who is refuse to call what it is by its name and speak to the ugliness. "the washington post" yesterday had a very compelling analysis of this. the author combined what these republicans and others who did not walk out of the room at a dinner party, if you hear an anti-semitic comment, if you don't call it out, to what happened in maryland when the university of maryland hospital put a naked woman in a hospital gown and socks in 3-degree weather on the street close to midnight. just patient dumping. something is wrong with our culture, and it starts at the top. the leader of the free world, the leader of our country, needs no show compassion and humanity, and that filters down at every level of society and it teaches

our children, and there's what really bothers me. >> you know, the view within the base, and not just the trump base but really more than the trump base, because face it, if it was just the trump base, he wouldn't be president of the united states today. there's more than the trump base. just because you're politically correct, and is that all bold in a 16 font doesn't mean you're racist. i think there is a disconnect between what the media is saying in terms of he's got to be a racist and the way he operates, born in 1946, a bit old school, and i know that scares folks, but old school and politically correct. you put it through the trump meter if you will trying to understand and dissect it, look, i've done 15 interviews with him since 2011, i think i have some standing to say what he's about, but his family, people who are close to him that wouldn't necessarily be blood supporters of him say this is not the donald trump that's being described in the media. then why doesn't he do something about it? why doesn't he himself fix his own image? he is very media vsavvy.

he seems not to want to correct this. >> a few things going on. when he's talking about these countries, he is talking about economic conditions. if norway was in disastrous straits, a bunch of white people in norway, he would say the exact same thing. people say he wouldn't say the same thing, but he would. he looks at it through an economic prism. >> can i say something about politics? he has not tweeted or said anything that i know of about the disaster in california, the earth -- the mudslides. this is a democratic state, the bluest state that we have perhaps. why does he not feel compassionate for humanity the way he does for disasters in texas? >> elise? >> i would like to push back a little bit on the premise of he's discussing the economic conditions and it isn't anything with racial implications.

certainly plenty of americans, both democratic and republican, you know, implemented the marshall plan, have reached out to other countries. they didn't go out of their way to alienate and antagonize them the way donald trump has by using this kind of incendiary language that has become a culture of cruelty that far supersedes any kind of partisanship. >> not to mention that there are many, many, many countries that have far more diverse populations than norway that are doing fantastically economically. he picked the quitest one that he could possibly find to make it -- >> it was just because he had been -- go ahead and respond and i'm going to take a break. >> they look at these media headlines and see the clip, the montage you played, but what was not in the montage in 1986, donald trump wonnen the award for diversity and tolerance. who was with him on that stage? rosa parks. so if we're going to have a montage, we probably should

include some of that. i'm not saying that defend what he did. what i'm saying is that's why there's a lot of distrust in the media today. >> that's good place to pause this conversation. guests are coming back, i promise. when we come back on this martin luther king jr. weekend, we'll talk to a prominent civil rights leader in our history, andrew young. (burke) at farmers, we've seen almost everything so we know how to cover almost anything. even a swing set standoff. and we covered it, july first, twenty-fifteen. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ ♪ oh, look... another anti-wrinkle cream in no hurry to make anything happen.

neutrogena® rapid wrinkle repair® works in just one week. with the fastest retinol formula available. it's clinically proven to work on fine lines and wrinkles. one week? that definitely works! rapid wrinkle repair®. and for dark spots, rapid tone repair. neutrogena®. see what's possible. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ what we do every night is like something out of a strange dream. except that the next morning... it all makes sense.

fedex powers global commerce with vast, far-reaching networks... deep knowledge of industries... and, yes... maybe a little magic. ♪ your bbut as you get older,ing. it naturally begins to change, causing a lack of sharpness, or even trouble with recall. thankfully, the breakthrough in prevagen helps your brain and actually improves memory. the secret is an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to improve short-term memory. prevagen. the name to remember.

welcome back. my next guest, andrew young, has been one of the leading voices in the civil rights movement for decades. he was executive director of the southern christian leadership conference, working closely with dr. martin luther king. later he served as a u.s. ambassador to the united nations, a congressman, and of course a two-term mayor of atlanta. when we last had ambassador young on "meet the press," it was a week after charlottesville. at the time, ambassador young seemed to want to give president trump the benefit of the doubt about what was in his heart after the president said there were very fine people on both side of the confrontation. so we were curious especially on martin luther king jr. weekend, about the president's comments

this week. welcome back to "meet the press." >> thank you very much. >> some of your fellow travelers in the civil rights movement, john lewis, jesse jackson, martin luther king's son, have been pretty tough on the president. they said in response, he speaks like one who knows something about being a racist. he speaks like a racist. martin luther king jr. iii yesterday caused him to lose any level of credibility. all of them stopped short of calling the president racist. where are you, sir? >> well, i'm of the opinion that we were important in a very complex, multicultural situation. i prefer to use the term ethnocenterism because it goes way back, and it doesn't help to put the label on any single person. dr. king said we were born in an unjust world, and none of us can take any virtue about being born black, white, liberal, or conservative.

we have a difficult situation. it was prove on the me when he came out of the meeting with senator goldberg at the u.n. with -- on vietnam and he refused to give any comment. and they asked him, well, what do you think of china? and he said, well, 800 million people are not going to disappear because we refuse to admit their existence. he was attacked by every single newspaper from washington to california, from chicago down to miami. that was the climate of the time, and it was absolutely stupid. one of the things he jim macesa related to that but which was quoted by the mayor of san juan, puerto rico, last night at the king dinner, was that martin luther king said that nothing is more dangerous in all the world than sincere ignorance and

enthusiastic stupidity. >> yeah. >> and i think that's what's going on around the country's got to be applied to any one person, that's what's going on around the country could be applied to both parties, it could be applied to just about every member of the house of representatives, that we don't really grasp the complexity of the times we're in, and we're trying to simplify and personalize it and that will not work. >> martin luther king's nephew, who stood next to the president when he signed the proclamation on friday, isaac faris, afterwards walking out of the white house, he was asked to respond to this issue, is the president a racist. and he said this -- i think president trump is racially ignorant and racially uninformed, but i don't think he is a racist in the traditional sense. so basically backing up what you were saying. but how do you educate a 71-year-old man in donald trump on the issue of race? >> well, very easy.

i think he's being educated. it's not a matter of educating donald trump. it's a matter of educating our entire society. getting president trump to be a saint is not going to change the employment situation. it's not going to change the global economy. it's not going to deal with the tensions between korea and the united states. this is a difficult world, and it doesn't help to label people. you know, you don't help someone who has an alcohol problem by constantly calling him a drunk. you have to deal with the sickness. >> let me ask you this final question, then. is the president redeemable? >> let me tell you something, i'm a christian, and all, men sin and fall short of the glory of god, and women do too. and if we were not redeemable, we would not be committed to our lord and savior jesus christ as

much as we are. we are committed because we are sinners that know we cannot make it on our own, and i think he's kind of got to realize that too. >> i think that's a pretty good way to end this. ambassador young, i always learn something when speaking with you, and i appreciate you coming on and sharing your views here on "meet the press," sir. >> well, god bless you. >> thank you, sir. when we come back, tangled up in blue. why more republican retirements this week have democrat it's easy to think that all money managers are pretty much the same. but while some push high commission investment products, fisher investments avoids them. some advisers have hidden and layered fees. fisher investments never does. and while some advisers are happy to earn commissions from you whether you do well or not, fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments.

clearly better money management. wiback like it could used to? neutrogena hydro boost water gel. with hyaluronic acid it plumps skin cells with intense hydration and locks it in. for supple, hydrated skin. hydro boost. from neutrogena ♪ jen, i've got questions. boots or flip-flops? boot! great. smokey or natural eye? ugh, natural. good choice. how about calling or texting? definitely calling. puppies or kitties?

sorry, cats. dry eyes or artificial tears? wait, that's a trick question. because they can both get in your way. that's why it is super-important to chat with your eye doctor if you're using artificial tears a lot and your eyes still feel dry. next question. guys, it's time for some eyelove! and i know that we havethe phone accident forgiveness.nt, so the incredibly minor accident that i had tonight- four weeks without the car. okay, yup. good night. with accident forgiveness your rates won't go up just because of an accident. switching to allstate is worth it. a heart transplant... that's a whole different ballgame. i was in shock. i am very proud of the development of drugs that can prevent the rejection and prevent the recurrence of the original disease. i never felt i was going to die. we know so much about transplantation. and we're living longer. you cannot help but be inspired by the opportunities that a transplant would offer. my donor's mom says

"you were meant to carry his story". we are back, "data download" time. only two weeks into the year, believe it or not, yet all eyes are already on the midterm elections this november. democrats need just 24 seats to take back control of the house, and boy, are they getting closer to achieving that goal. why? because a whopping 30 republican house members have already decided to leave congress. 18 are retiring outright, while the other 12 have decided to run far higher office, the old up or out move. and things are looking for democrats to pick up at least some of these open seats. why?

well, hillary clinton won five of these districts in 2016 and came within single digits in another five. these are places that are already trending democratic but good feelings about the incumbent likely cause many to split their tickets in the last election, and they vote differently with no incumbent in the race. then there's the demographic makeup of some of these districts. they show good signs for democrats as well in these open seats. for one, many of these open seats are from more racially diverse districts. 12 of the retirement districts are above the national average for their minority population, 38.7%. many of these places have growing latino communities, a group republicans already struggle with more so now with this president. 11 districts have population where is more than 30% of those 25 or older have a bachelor's degree, higher than the national average. better educated voters like these have also been trending blue. finally, there's simply the geography. 15 of these 30 districts with retiring republicans are either

in urban or suburban america, one more good sign for democrats who are already dominating the urban areas and seeing big gains in suburban america. as npr's jessica taylor noted, the last time we saw close to this many retirements in a midterm year was 1994, when 28 democrats decided to retire and the gop took control of the house by a big margin. so, so far we have 30 announced retirements, three just this week, and we are not even out of january. don't be surprised if we hear of several more before the end of the month, let alone the end of the quarter. we'll be back in a moment "end. game." ♪ traders -- they're always looking for advantages. the smart ones look to fidelity to find them.

we give you research and data-visualization tools to help identify potential opportunities. so, you can do it this way... or get everything you need to help capture investment ideas and make smarter trading decisions with fidelity for just $4.95 per online u.s. equity trade. fidelity. open an account today. ♪ open an account today. pain from chest congestion can make this... when you have a cold, ...feel like this. all-in-one cold symptom relief from tylenol®, the #1 doctor recommended pain relief brand. tylenol®.

a whole new concept in skin say heldefense.e-tox! new absolutely ageless®... ...pre-tox day mask from aveeno®. its' powerful anti-oxidant formula... ...fights pollution and keeps skin looking younger, longer. aveeno®. we can now repair complex at saortic aneurysmsare,

without invasive surgery. if we can do that, imagine what we can do for varicose veins. and if we can precisely treat eye cancer with minimal damage to the rest of the eye, imagine what we can do for glaucoma, even cataracts. if we can use dna to diagnose the rarest of diseases, imagine what we can do for the conditions that affect us all. imagine what we can do for you.

"end game" -- brought to the you by boeing -- continuing our mission to connect proshgs text, explore, and inspire. back now with "end game." before i get to campaign politics, we have to remind ourselves it's january 14th. it's only been 14 days, two weeks in this new year. david graham in "the atlantic" friday wrote the following -- here's the paradox. everyone from the president to

his staff to the people knows the current situation is a disaster but there's no way to end the current situation, until the end of 2020. the situation will remain much as it is with the president widely acknowledged to be dysfunctional and no way to change that. there is no exit. i found it fascinating, andrea, because no matter what your view of this president, you want him to succeed, you want him to fail, yet everybody feels the same -- stuck. >> and senator bennett actually acknowledging that. you have to work with him. he is the president that we have. the 25th amendment is a fiction because it requires a two-thirds vote of this cabinet. imagine this cabinet -- >> that was done for incapacitation purposes, not for something else, arguably. >> and to be quickly remedied if nesby them taking over. >> that's right. >> so that is not going to happen. impeachment unlikely and would tear the country apart, and certainly unlikely with this house. not to expect that. what are the other options? there are no other realistic options. this is the situation we are in,

and i kind of like what andy young said about you don't keep telling an alcoholic you're a drunk, you work with it, and i guess that is the way they're going to have to work to avoid a government shutdown and come up with some kind of compromise. >> david brody, there is a relief valve once in a while, every two years, called midterm elections. it looks like many americans may express their opinion then. >> for sure, and we'll find out about those suburban places we hear so much about. the white house can trot out the child care tax credit. they are looking at paid family leave as well. here's my point. what they need to do from a communications standpoint is really push that forward and make sure that's a common theme going into 2018 because obviously it is going to be challenging. i think the question is how much water can be in the boat before the boat capsizes, and i think that will be crucial. >> elise, two weeks in, it feels like we're losing a member of congress on the republican side of the aisle about every couple

of days. let me just put up here past house waves, the last three times congress changed hands. in 1994, republicans needed 41, got 52. in 2006, democrats needed 16, they got 30. in 2010, republicans needed 40, they got 63. the point is when a wave happens it's bigger than necessary and that's what this smells like. >> the common strain of all of those years that the opposition party, that they were pulling double digit with independents, that the incumbent wasn't popular by double digits, and you look at what's what is happen right now, donald trump being between 11% and 16%. so depths are on track with those prior years. >> yeah. >> what i find interesting is wondering how president trump behaves if he does end up with a democratic house or democratic house and senate, do we see a different president trump, do we see a president trump who's not anywhere near as the coconservative right-wing perso he's been. >> didn't we get it this week in

a weird way, the schizophrenia of trump on imdwramigrationimmi? one day a bill of love, then the other democrats don't want daca. >> immediately pointing out getting rave reviews for that thing in the white house immediately responds to the base when ann coulter and others go after him. he seems more worried about protecting that 38% base an this anything else, and that is not a realistic strategy. >> speaking about 38% base, david graham used the word dysfunctional. look, in that base world and an evangelical world for sure, the word is functional, not dysfunctional, and that's the disconnect and that's what people didn't pick up on in 2016. and you wonder if that same narrative isn't continuing. >> all right. helene, your beat is the pentagon. andrea, your beat is the national security here at nbc. hawaiians were woken up in the morning to this alarming thing. it turned out to be the mistake

of somebody in hawaii's state emergency management. but there are a lot of -- thousands of people who took it very seriously and understandably so, but, boy, this is a wake-up call to when we live in the nuclear age, the speed of communications, and the atmosphere. >> it really is. it's so frightening. many of us knew pretty early on that this was not actually a ballistic missile. >> not hawaiians. >> not hawaiians. in the climate that we're in right now given the sort of rhetoric, even though it's calmed down considerably with these talks between seoul and pyongyang, it still was a really scary thing, and there's the sort of thing that you just can't get wrong but it's very easy to get wrong. >> in terms of instantaneous communications, the one thing you worry about, and i got the call instantly and was calling offici intelligence officials and getting the all-clear quickly, but what kind of response -- is there a military response if someone in the chain of command

believes there's an error or believes that there is a rogue in the rogue regime, there is some element not wanting these talks. you really can't absolutely be sure unless you have clear intelligence, clear lines of communication. congress is going to hold hearings. the fcc is going to do an examination. but we really have to upgrade our responses, because this is the first real misfire on a system that was put in in 2012 to have cell phone notification, and there's what made the difference here. >> when you think of the chain reaction that could have sparked, where the united states thinks they're under attack and they retaliate, and you think about people in seoul and in japan, people in south korea at that point, you could be at defcon whatever in seconds. >> especially since we have a president who we know tweets based on what's on "fox & friends" sometimes, the timing of it, that has been a concern to some. >> this all comes back to twitter and comes back to can this president use his twitter feed in a responsible manner.

and this past week it didn't even seem that way because he was pretty all over the place and then the first day of the new year, the first official day of business, he's taunting kim jong-un. white house officials are desperate for him to stop personalizing his spat with kim jong- jong-un, to make it about negotiations and not about his personal beef. >> good luck with that. >> maybe a little less executive time might be in the offing. anyway, thank you very much. and thank all of you for watching us as well. we'll be next week because if it's sunday, it's "meet the press." >> you can see more "end game" and postpostresponsibili"postga press" facebook page.

this week, the fda approved the first device for the apple watch. and a veteran briefs us veterans in the workforce and sarah lacy feels repressed, and michael from cork and mike sullivan from fast company. in week on press here. good morning everyone, i'm scott mcgrew, the apple watch has been a big hit or miss for apple and it h