this week inside theñ/b produc@ =uq of a pool ofñr ym plastic. theñiinventorñrñiñi dr.n'ju desimone, ceo of carbon.iñiñi plus, dr. davidñi brumley who trains the nextxd generation of best and brightest atxdg our çóreporters, cyberñi security andçóñiñr reporterñi johnçóñrñiñi schwartz from here "qçóñre ñiñre1w3çó. ñi kwm hgood morning, everyone. reporters collect things from stories they've done, andñr this is a teañr cup made plastic. it's theçóñrñi fistrst thing i ever saw

printed on a 3-dmy printer 10 15 years ñiago. they work byxdlpçó adding layerñiwg[s upon layer over and over. they're slow andñi work with only a limited number of materials. that hard plastice1 created inçó layers means myñiçó tea cup is very fragile fragile. the bottom has alreadyçó broken off. obviously we've começó a long way in the past ten years. this is the headquartersñi of carbon whe$ ok engineers are }ual products, not just ñr curiosities. r if this reminds you a littleñit(ñiñi of "terminator" youc aren'tñr theñiçó o same thing. joe is the ceo behind this new way of printing.ñrñ2 @r(t&ho i see you brought ñrprops. i haa9ñ your props areñi ñibetter.

let me see yourñr props. that is añiñrñiñiñr bicycle seat.ñiñr sglf . >> that's correct. >>çó2tjis is not a model. this is çóthe finished ñrñiproduct. coming out of a 9light-basedçó ñai printer. >> they're not m)sq&s that are going to be manufactured psomewhere else. these are theçó thingsñi that will actually go on people'sfá feetxd andko in fact i happenñi to know you're webï >> i am.ñi the whole ñridea 3-d printing has been a]iñ prototyping industry, an $8 billionçóñi marketplace hardware software materials and even the products. injection molding is ai] ñr$300 billionñr juggernaut butñi that's manufacturing. our technology allows one toç! #qkeu ñi100 to 1,000 timesçafaster. we figured out how to haveñi finished materials coming outçó of the printer, and so when you'e5ñ the materials to be a finished çó good it really opens up digital manufacturing at scale. >> it just looks like magic and i will say to the v)ç 1ñ whenñrñi

we'reçó showing that thingñ mrng out of it, it's a ball coming t( out, we're speeding up the videoñiñr a bit.e but theñiñi same idea you'reçó pulling a 3-d object out of a puddleñiçóçó of material. >> we thinkñr of thjc ast( añi software-controlled chemical reaction. this is abñ#ut as deep tech asñr you can get. it's chemistry. it's physics. it'sçó softwareñiñrú5%9 we have a great ñiçóxdñrñrñrñichemical,çóu physical matter all coming together that allowsñiñi us toñi makeñiñiçó amazing productsrhthat are unmoldable byokçóçóçóñiñiçó traditional manufacturing. >> in addition to theseñi jf products, are you still involvedñrñi withñrñi riddell football ñselmets? >> we are. >> and i thinkxd dental labs? canúxvu expl>q that because that seemsçóñi to beñr theçó largestçó marketer opportunity it seems for wh i you and others do.ñi >> yeah. so we figuredçó out añi wayr lightñr to craft things and it's ako

ofñi resins. we have over 50ñiçóñi resins and every resin has a different setçó ofçóñirñi manufactured to differentçóçó ma[[dt applications.mr(t&háhp &hc% we haveçó dentalçy/ñiñi resins andçó the dentalñi resins range fromñi dentalok products. we also nowñi have the world's first t(fdañi approved 3-d printed dentures dentures. dentu marketplace. >> alsgiñi the auto industry? >> we have íh very first 3-dñr parts everñiñi on a production vehicle out of ñrdetroit. >> normallyñi 3-d printed parts, teañr cup being an example,çós7 are incrediblye lyfragile andxdñi used asñrñi prototypes. sqáq are incrediblyñiu because of the latic work (1" )(eh$ inside. >> it'se1 mostly aboutñr the chemistry and theñr opportunities have the properties to be a finished good and the software controlled processr

coupled with chemistryñi gives you u$ose finished ñrproperties. >> is there any way to explain how the moleculesñi knowñi toñrçóçóñr glom onto the right bit as you're pulling simpleñ2hq'glish major, itçó seems kind of ñiñrmagic. )merñsure. soñr light will solidify theseçó resins partially. we developed a process that uses oxygenñr and light in combination and that's what wasñr td3 big breakthrough issue published in science and onñió[çó añi at the time çóñi talk. what happens is we're basicallyñi pulling a product out ofñiñiñi a é% the idea ñiwas,ñi th@xd idea from çóçó "terminator" could theñi source of theçó mass andñi7#át partq belp derived from añr puddleñimy un m)neath. if you bring añiñrñr platformñiñr together and start pulling a pirtçó out,çóñi ot liquid state. light trifeers the liquid to solidify andçó$atñi allows us to always have añr river of resinçó underneath the part asi we pullñr itçó ñrmyñiñrñrout. that's how weçó too whatdo what youçóñr do. >> you?;ñi created a ñilqs,ñr almostñi like açóçó contactçóñiñrñró[q lens

that's perm is this something that you're going to thenñi licenseñi out? itñr seemsçó likeñrñiñi this is a revolution inñi manufacturing, therefore al táhj @r(t&háhp &hc% applications in all kinds ofñi factori5$&%uz ñrp>éuár!le. >> it is a platform andñi we've gotñi foam replacement fromñrñi running shoesçó"nñr to bike seatsñrñr to añrñi wholelp host of different applicationsçóçóçóñi likeñiñi riddell helmets.4h['p+e rigidñrñiñrñrñi plastics for0l automoá eñiçó aé r(páions.ñi we haveñrçóñrñi biosurgical materialsçós7 and dental materials, youçójfçó name çóñi it. model or sales ñrrevenue? i knowñi you've raised a lot of çó money, what, $680ñi million, amendçó i think in the ñiindustry, i think at leastñi $650 million was invested this year. yet if you look at the performance of some of the

nano dimension or slm, they're down signifi/antly. i'm tryingçóçó to fi(w)eçó outçó among the y versus public companies what you do that differentiates you from the others. >> greatñi ñrquestion. 3-d printing from a prototyping world to manufacturing. so the tam inñi prototyping -- çó well,çó theçó market right nowñi isfr& aboutñi $8 ñibillion. injection moldingçó is ae1 xd$300 billionñiñrñiñi julyggernaut. most produst+are made byñi molding andñr ñrcasting.çóñr it was inventedçóó[ñiñiñi ñrñi7,000 years ago. it filís"up the volume, xdco 9ñçó that's the wayçó injectionçó molding isñrñrw3ñiñiñrñi doing. we're powering autonomous vehicles ñrñi %-pwe'reñi makingñrq designs that areçó unmoldable,ñie/+ and 90%çó of theñ ñi warrantyñrñiñro5+çór

oóñrñrçóhtñiñi thoseçóçóçó are failures of connectors. >> what can't you do? what is notú2;n÷ ñiçópossible?> we don't dog >> couldçó you someñi day doñiñrñi ñimetals? >> no. the;or physics are not inñiçó y ñi favor? >> about four yearsñr ago you won a bunch of ñ awards forñrñiñr nanoñi medical capabilities. here you are makingçó bicycle seats. shouldn't you beçó curing cancer? are you doing that on thexdñrçóxd side? >> you know, you're ñrright. life sciences is a big part ofñi my career living at the intersection of science, wnót)át where we're going consumer products canñi go ñiquick. the ideañi of having a çóñiproduct, market%iacceptance. automotive takes longer, life scienceñiñr even longer. weñi decidedçóñrñi dental isu would start. dentures, there's 60 million americans thatñiñi cannotñr affordñr dentures. gives people access to great health care is a bigñi part of

what we do. that's ex0 9 opportunity. you could argue we should do no&qmejq&se but dentures.ñi that's such a big ñiopportunity. we have now materialsçóñr that are ñr bioabsorbable allowing companies like j & j toñi design products that bb have a mechanicale1 useçó forñi a short period of life and dissolve in thefá water soluble!@r(t&háhp &hc)tpoppoognts andñi open up nei products. >> let meq get one last qtgstion. i askdfñi earlier what's not possible. let me askokñi txq you, what's theñiñr thing you would m n next once you've masteredçóñi the other ñrot/things? >> oriñi platformñi is theñi world's for a pieceñiñi of manufacturingñrñi what that really means is a datañiñiçóñrñiñi centrha world. every part hasñi a qr code a ñ record in the cloud at ñiñraws.>x@r(t&háhp &hc% it's got a certificate$# data file. we have a lot of postçóñr market opportu

recycle ñit(çóproducts, but having a dataçó centric worldñi opens up a there's billions of dollarsxdñiñrñi ofçér." inventory sittingçó in climateñiñr (zntrolledñi warehousesútsat are just dormantq-twaiting. the opportunitylpñi toñr reduce, di$ $ose are justñi business modelñiñr and software. >> the machine inçó asiaz/ printñi it when you need it from theñiñi u >>çó having a deepñi tech that >> and edge cñrcomputing. >> right.ñiñi the one thing that's been held back is having a digital scale at quality and that's whatñr we do. >>ñi you've understandably raised hundreds of millionsçó of dollarsñi for amazing manufacturing eppr(ment. we appreciate youñi being with us this morning. >>çóçó thank you very much. cyber security experts says theçó u.s. military ought to be given more freedom toçó attackñr ourñi

enemies whenfá ñi"press: here" continues.

welcome ñrñrback.ñi we ha.dyone of the world'sñ"uufá two reportersñi whoñi hvm writtençó books on the subject.ñi we'll cover two ideas to start with. one, that the u.s. military

should be moreñi free to conduct cyber offenses against our çó nation's enemy"+u withoutñi explicit/+ññr permission from national commandñr authority. the second is the )áuqñrt( of patching. when a company discovers añrçóñi sc exploit,w3 they issue a fix a patch.çóqfáxdñi but dr. david brumley says they cadi do more harm than good because hackers foundçóñr newçó flaws in the patches.ñinúpr(t&háhp &hc% before we ñistart, as añr ñiñist i try toñr find ar betweenñi intelligentó conversation among experts and notñr getting so far intoó[the weeds asñi toñi onlyñi people can understand. i'm notñi going to do that this i'm going to give joe and john a bit more leashko toñi take adz of the fact thatçóñr we've#w q,pert here andçóñiñiçóçó dig deep with dr. çóçóbrumley. if you don'tçóñiñvu9iq9 what'sñiñr g happeningñi neither do i.

thank you for bein1! let me point$x out dr.çóçó brugle1ñ someonefáçó said you areñiçóçó adamantlyñiñrñrñi revered by5açó academics spies andñrçóv technology experts alike. thank you for being with us. >> thank you. >> what wasñr theñi issue? >> it'sçó not thatñi theñi hackers findxd flaws in the a5ñipatches.4/ there's nothing wrong with the p, patches. it's thatçó they reverse engineer the patches to figure out what the flaw was andçó they cañr attack through there for anybodyçó who hasn't patched. what's really alarmingñiñr about that an automated way to doçó thatçó in ñiseconds. there's nobodynb that can patch within second$i the masses of us can't.çó sounds? >> i don't want to alarm people. wha we'reokñrñiçó discovering is there'sj%7eujr consequences in cyber. what you just described is one of them. if microsoftr teleases a ñipatch i cançóñié@ essentially compute the difference between the two andñi find outñr whatu create an,v(loit for that. >> becauseq the othefiñi people haven't patched yet the patch

is brand new therefore you've got all these things you can attack. >> yeah. >v a'm with you guys so far. >> it's pretty straight forward. it goes deeper than that. its bout patches. for ea1ñ one of the thingsçó we found is that ifçó i exploit çó you, ñiñiwell, exploit is justñr bits on a çówire. you can copy those pand use themw3 against him.jf you haveñi to think through these ñr effects. it's not just i have anñrçó exploit, çwr an use ñrit.çó i can discover expli%m from others and that canth$áqp&ly give me an advantage. >> let's stick with (rr'g for a second. patching is one of te)eñi --çóçóxdñiñi the biggest problems in the entire industry butçópi> all so youçóñrçó never see stories cycles.çóñr ña=5auqé%ááu+eh$ compatibiiéy, you patch one tring and you might breakçóñrçóçóçóñr it gets really, really tricky.3rapplyçó patches in añiñi time effective ma worse? ñ how long?ñrçó @r(t&háhp &hc%

>> well,ñi you reallyñiñiñr have to break it intoñiñi t(ñitearsiers. when you talk microsoft andñiñiñi google and products people are familiar withñi it's really good. google, if they findñrñr< ñiñia5w3 añrñiçó flaw in world inçó 30 days. on thelp other end of the9 )b] oneçów3fá conversation i had with an tpexecutive at a company thatñi made millions of devices wasñi we're never going toçó patch them. je$iñi shou5ru5eitu+háheçó new device. a caveat, iñ co-write a book on6oyiñiu soñr i'mó[ playing ñicatchupñr here. you talk about theñi arms races andñr iú.19q to bringw3 it to a facebook recently talked about how they're better prepared than?; ever through spendingfá or through previousçóñr mistakesñi to defendñi themselves whioh!rings mer of toqñb"thisñiçóñi notion where they're but in terms ofçóçó anticipating what willñi happen sayñi the 2020

5= election, we're going to probably see somet(çó more incidents that they're having to fix. does that buiost consumers feel very n just facet[jz but other comái'ies in parx!ular? >> firstñi cyber security is a somewha $=u98uht)q&d so we'ret( got cyber ñiñrwrong. defense and no one can get past it.ñiñ. what people are ñirealizing it's about the speedçóñzofñrñiñi ñireaction. if so saysñr we're betterñrñrçóçó prepared, i think we're more secure but we can more quicklyfáñi respond. >> lñz these days isñ9içóñifá çóñrresilience. defense andñi you have to2aqsume they'reñiñiçó in thereñi and you'rrñr getting too farñr(t if>xu$eyzuz turn offs7 the çólightsñ some back-up plan to get the lights backçó on, both literally and metaphorically.ñr+ñiñiñr

critical infrastructureb.ñr resilience is0lñr where it needs to @ í$anñi it was fiveçó years ago, orñrñi hasçóçó offenseñr again4c= it's nowhere near where itñi needs to be.ñi critical infrastructureñr is = about likeñi maybe a power plant.+ s. lsot( goes into things likti ñi hospitals, into aircraft stuff that was designed toñ time. justñrñi doesn't get updated every çó day.ok [h'eed to start baking these concepts and new things thatñi we produce but we have to figureñi o+ae)q things weñr doótoday, how to bake inñi resilience. >>ñ'iñi you're doing some work with the dod to protectzñrthem. you have very high security cleensz forñi all ofñi this.ñi whatñiñi can you tell us about where we areñrñmm a country vulnerable in our defenseñi network that you are workingxcon?fáñijf >> we started for all secureñr andñi

what we're trying to do is apply dm legacy systems, so things like aircraftñiñiñi tanks ships thingsñi thatxd were buillá in the ñi'50s.ñrñr how do we startñiçóç checking it for modern vulnerabilityiesñr that no one anticipated and alsoñi f o building ñitrust. the way the dod works is like ié@buy+ something offñr amazon i have to trust that it ñiworks. i don't have a l checkñi itñi myself. that'sçóñi how the dod ñiworks.ñi t y'+m uyingñi a jet soñi how doñi we give themñrñi the ability to >> that5#?zñr çóñiinteresting, ançóñi ñ interestinkútp)allel w theñi internet ofñi things. i ááusq" it was going to be some huk-ñz defense networkñi withñ)h @r(tf o computersñr talkinkr to em and you'reçó talking about somebody hackingñi a tank. >> isñiñiñiñiñi veryñiñiñrñi similar to something like iot. that had neverñiñr occurred to me.çó guys.

>> there'sçorñi asymmetric warfareñiñ from hostile countries. you seeñi them trying tió probe ñiñiñi infrastructure. weñiñre15â]emñi hear that thatçó remainsñi somewhatñi stable orñi is itñrçó increasing? >> i think it'sñ9i escalating. about deterrence whenñiñi they're talking about cyber2ópolicy. leaders they're ?;saying ñino, it's5= persistent engagement now. >> and defend forward and all theseñi different phrases forçó basically already being enemy network in order to mess them up beforehj fire somethingçó that's coming. so it'sñi a lot moreñrfá confrontational than it used to íye. butñr sticking withñrñi the theme of i] asymmetry asymmetry, one of theç?$u$ings that makesñiñrñifáçó people nervous is the destruction of a group like isis with no assets isn'tñi going to beçóñi much of afá deterrent. eá- lotñr toñr lose. a lot of people sayñrñ+w the u.s. has the most to lose as cyber escalates. if youl

more aggressive and this is a good thing, isn'tçóçó that goingñi toñiñi redound against us in a prettyçó alarming way?ñr >> okfirst,xdñr everyw3 engagementxd you >ty have toñi think about whoñr your), c@ cf1 o# mie approach cyber in afghanistan is>ti tu)qr technologicallyçóñiçóçóñrñi sophistñrcatedñ)y1 adversary. >> theñr question, do we have the mostmyfáñr toññilose, i thinkñiñi that'sçó part of theñiñr thought process in vo be aggresqr+e butñiñiñr they're going toçó pys back añi bit because they don'tñi want to -- the mainçóñiñr job is to protect the american people and they don't wantñr to do something that's goik to putñi us at risk.ñi we've done actuallyñi a lot of research in ñrthis. >> dr. david brumley is withñi carnegie mellon. i want to ask a cc &e moreçó @

questions soxbm?=ml goñiçóñi onlineñi on ñiñrñiñrñr pressheretv.com. for theñr rest of tjw people back in ie&q mike bloomberg's never been afraid of tough fights the ones that make a true difference in people's lives. and mike's won them, which is important right this minute, because if he could beat america's biggest gun lobby, helping pass background check laws and defeat nra backed politicians across this country, beat big coal helping shut down hundreds of polluting plants and beat big tobacco helping pass laws to save the next generation from addiction. all against big odds you can beat him. i'm mike bloomberg and i approve this message.

welcomeñiñi back.

we were talking duringñr the break about ñizuckerberg,ñi he was at ñrçóñi georgetown recentlyt( talking about free spee interesting because youñrb]ould see him almost stepping through what he was trying to think of.çó obviously it was açó ñrprepractice things and they just don't ç2n4jt&ho square, joe. >> that's exactly the problem. he's framing itko as free speech and it's americaxdlt martinçóñiñiñiñi luther king, it's great thawr he whaáqk átj us great but thatl7 zt what commercial businesses do. that is not the issue. theñi issue isçólp amplification. because their ads and contentñr isfá prioritized for engagement, ñr controversial,ñi5añiçó even false stuff circulates better. it performsçó better and that has nothing to do with free speech. >> a drug companyñie1 can'tçó say we can cure cancer and say, wellxdñrñiçóçó no, it's free speech.

the same thingr where do you draw theñi line between lyingçó andñrñr free speech. offense to what heñi said att( çó georgetown.)ojqj he spokeñiñiçóñi befo financial servicesñiñi committee, this free speech tm movingñr a forñiñi political advertising for instance.+ cf1 o he wasçó "shed onát at least four or "!, timesñrñr whenñr he spoke before the hou ñi (p''t poss)svñi --fá we at theçó content of thei] political ñi ads.ñi therefore we cknlq monitor or -- ads can go and whichçóv you see>x+here somebody would ñisayñr no th ( ad is. >> that's oneñiñr of the arguments

in defense of policy but they have fact checkers. there'sñixdfáñrñi noe1 wayñi that theyñi would beçcble to subjec!ñi political ads to factçó checking.çó they just don't want to do it. by anñrñr amazingñiçó coincidence pressureááz politicians andmy regulatorsround the world and he's justçó givenç> buttigieg as well.ñi >> there's#d ñúçnink toçó college. >> they d together. >> but the whole thing to me with facebook, it's always a mmving targetñr with ñrxdthem. there's always well, this happened, yet we're going to doñi this. they seem to be hedging their %"t!ets talkingñr around topics until they hav éo explainçó themselves. that's why he's in front of congress so often. he's under. you got elizabeth warrene1 talking abolzq ads that were false andñrçóñi the

conservatives are at least claiming thatñi ñrñiñiñiñrhey,ñi you're sensoringsense really hard time. >> yeah. it's reallyñi ñiinteresting. i thinkñi a lotñi of the conservativeçóñi stuff, evenñiw3ñr very sophisticated tech savvy conserva(av actually don't haveñr evidence of ñiñrñiñr censorship. printed in any ír reviewç?$ @r(t&háhp &hc ;prráerature that i've seen. i don't think there is a case for that but it's li'q they'reñi working the çóçórefs.ñi meá reepéively to makeñiñrçó zucke2çi anything thatw%uld ke$q%ithem. >> one5añr ref is saying completion. the other is saying the pass was no good.ñr thanks joe, we'i

that's our show for this ñruutt)yu

earlier in theñrçó top of theñi show we hadçó dr. joeñrw3 desimone of theñiñrçó he was the winner this most recent year of theñr entrepreneur of the yearçó awardçó in northern ñi california, somethingçó thatñrx:jñt( em>pqq nd i encourage you to i will tweet outñi moreñi information t(@scottmcgrew on ñi @r(t&ho twitter. thank you for making us part of your sunday. damian trujillo: hello and welcome to "comunidad del valle." again, i'm damian trujillo.

it's been a while, a couple of months but we're back on the show. we hope you're having a great holiday season. on our show today, los tres reyes magos on your "comunidad del valle." ♪ damian: we begin today with becoming mujeres, a special endeavor by my next guest here on, "comunidad del valle." dr. coco castaneda is my guest along with her daughter lupita here on, "comunidad del valle." well, welcome to the show, nice maria del socorro castaneda: thank you. lupita castaneda-liles: thank you. damian: tell us first of all about becoming mujeres we'll get into lupita's part in it, but tell us about this endeavor. maria: okay, so becoming mujeres is it's an organization that offers workshops and seminars to latinas ages 13 and older on subjects ranging from, with the teens social exclusion, bullying body shaming.