this sunday, assault on democracy, egged on by president trump. >> we're going to walk down to the capitol, because you'll never take back our country with weakness. you have to show strength. >> thousands of pro trump rioters storm into the capitol building, overwhelming security. members of congress cowering in the house gallery. >> we were just told that there has been teargas in the rotunda. we're being instructed to, each of us, get gas masks.

>> five people dead. the speaker's office breached. many other trashed. scenes more out of a dictatorship than a democracy. now the aftermath, democrats moving to impeach the president a second time. >> i think the american people have seen enough, and they're ready for us to do the job of impeaching this man. >> cabinet secretaries and other officials resigning. >> i can't stay here, not after yesterday. >> the president permanently banned from twitter insisting he and his supporters will not go away. a democracy in crisis. my guest this morning, former trump chief of staff, mick mulvaney, hakeem jeffries and republican senator pat toomey of pennsylvania. joining me for insight and analysis are nbc news capitol hill correspondent kasie hunt, senior washington correspondent hallie jackson, former homeland secretary jay johnson and wall street journalist peggy noonan. welcome to sunday and a special

edition of "meet the press." >> from nbc news in washington, the longest running show in television history, this is a special edition of "meet the press" with chuck todd. good sunday morning. it was almost exactly four years ago at his inauguration that donald trump stood at the u.s. capitol and said, this american carnage stops right here and stops right now. on wednesday, that american carnage came to the capitol. inspired by a president trying to deny his successor's inauguration. make no mistake, what happened that day was an insurrection against the united states government. by thousands of pro-trump rioters who stormed and sacked the capitol, aided by elected republicans trying to overturn joe biden's victory with a big lie and inspired by a president of the united states who urged that mob on. then later that day, excuse the violence with a lie again, calling the election fraudulent.

since wednesday, president trump has been largely out of sight, muzzled by twitter and facebook. his only public appearance, a walk-it-back video scripted by someone else in which he told those same rioters they will pay if they broke the law. so now what now? democrats are preparing to impeach president trump for a second time. speaker nancy pelosi promising to move forward with mr. trump does not resign. there has been talk of removing the president through the 25th amendment, but there does not appear to be enough support for that. mr. trump has even said to be discussing trying to preemptively pardon himself, or he could be talked into resignation early in order to receive a more legally sound pardon from a president pence. wednesday's madness was what happens when supporters take president trump both seriously and literally. still, this was as predictable as it was shocking.

in fact, don't take my word for it. take the word of senator marco rubio who said this in 2016 about supporting candidate trump, something he has done since 2016. you mark my words, there will be prominent people in american politics who will spend years explaining to people how they fell into this. days after he provoked a violent mob that stormed the capitol, a single article of preemt is expected to be introduced on monday accusing president trump of incitement of insurrection if he does not resign. >> we're going to walk down, and i'll be there with you, because you'll never take back our country with weakness. you have to show strength. >> there's a gun. there's a gun. >> this video shows the moment rioters reached the door of the speaker's lobby leading to the house chambers. lawmakers hiding in fear. capitol police brandishing guns in an armed standoff.

>> we were just told that there has been teargas in the rotunda, and we're being instructed to, each of us, get gas masks that are under our seats. >> dozens have now been charged after wednesday's rampage including richard barnett of arkansas, photographed in speaker pelosi's office, lonnie kaufman of alabama whose vehicle allegedly contained 11 molotov cocktails, a handgun and an assault rifle, he was carrying two more guns. jacob anthony chansley who confronted law enforcement carrying a spear. protester ashli babbitt. capitol police officer brian sicknick died after being struck with a fire extinguisher. >> this is an act of terrorism. this is what the fbi will be focused on 24/7.

>> the president on wednesday telling the mob. >> this is a fraudulent election but we can't play into the hands of these people. we have to have peace. so go home. we love you -- >> only taping a scripted about face after pressure? >> my focus transfers to ensuring a smooth, orderly transition of power. >> then tweeting supporters, we'll have a giant voice long into the future. they will not be disrespected or treated unfairly, saying he will not be going to biden's inauguration. hours later twitter permanently suspended his account due to the risk of further incitement of violence. democrats are pushing to impeach him a second time. >> he has done something so serious that there should be prosecution against him. >> i think the american people have seen enough. >> republican senator lisa murkowski calling on president trump to step down, quote, i want him out, he's caused enough

damage. >> i will definitely consider whatever articles they might move. as i've told you, i believe the president has disregarded his oath of office. >> senate republican leader mitch mcconnell is making it clear impeachment proceedings could not start until january 19th in the senate, a day before biden is sworn in. >> i think it's a ridiculous discussion to have. we don't have the time for it to happen even if there was a reason. >> joining me now is president trump's former chief of staff, mick mulvaney who himself just resigned as special envoy to northern ireland as a result of wednesday's riot. mr. mulvaney, welcome back to "meet the press." to viewers and yourself, yes, i have a rough voice. a lot of broadcasting during the week and a lot of hot water and lemon this weekend. mr. mulvaney, let me start with -- you worked with him very closely. what is his state of mind right now? >> chuck, thanks very much for having me. sorry you're feeling under the

weather. i don't know. i know what it would have been like eight months, a year ago, i have seen the president in similar circumstances, certainly nothing of this gravity. i've not told folks this story before about how we had an incident duringthe impeachment wh he was accused in social media or bysome politicians of interfering with a witness while she was testifying. i know a little bit about witness intimidation, didn't think it was a legal problem, but we knew it was a political problem. i went to him privately, closed the door and said, mr. president, this is a problem, we need to fix it. he pushed back a little bit. then he called the lawyer. then he called kevin mccarthy. he called ivanka and a bunch of his friends in new york. over the course of the next hours, he took data and information and opinions from a bunch of different people and then he pivoted and changed course. that's the president i knew. that's the reason why i thought we would never be here. i thought the president would be presidential. clearly, that system has broken down. whether or not the president is different or the people advising him are different or both, i

don't know what's going on inside the oval office now and i don't know what's going on inside the president's head. >> so you say he's different. but in fairness, and you probably knew this was coming, in 2016 congressman mick mulvaney called then candidate donald trump a terrible human being, said he would be disqualified from office in an ordinary universe because of what you said were atrocious things he had said. do you wish you had listened to congressman mulvaney? >> chuck, i'm very familiar with that comment. if you look at that in context, that was the day after the ""access hollywood"" tape and the locker room talk as he describes it. that's different. policy differences are different. stylistic differences are different, things you don't like about a person's personalities are different than what happened on wednesday. wednesday was a fundamental threat to the united states. it speaks to what makes us american. it's an existential type of thing.

it's not superficial. it's deep and it's real and it's different which is why you saw so many resignations this week and didn't see them over the course of the last couple years. wednesday changed everything. >> a lot of people would push back at you and say character is destiny. in fact, i do -- you've used this eight-month marker, and his incendiary rhetoric goes back far greater than just the last few weeks. here are some examples. >> i love the old days. you know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in place like this? they'd be carried out on a stretcher, folks. >> if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. although the second amendment people, maybe there is. i don't know. >> proud boys stand back and stand by. >> you see where i'm going here. it is one of these things, you are basically saying i didn't see this version of donald trump. a lot of us, with all due

respect, said yeah, this version of donald trump to us didn't change. this was the guy we saw celebrating violence in '16, and it just sort of carried through to sadly this inevitable conclusion. >> i know it's easy for folks who have never liked the president or always disagreed with his policies or really disliked him as a person to say why didn't everybody see this coming. keep in mind so many of us that worked with him every single day didn't see him through a filter. in fairness, you saw him -- you've had some face to face with him. most people saw him through the filter of a media that didn't like him very much. we saw him every single day. the reason i wrote the "wall street journal" six weeks ago that i thought the president would leave presidentially is because i had evidence to that end. i had stories, i had background. i had seen that type of president. i never thought i'd see what i saw on wednesday. yes, the rhetoric was very high and fiery. you and i both know, however, american politician does this on a regular basis.

i could pull you similar clips of maxine waters telling people to take to the streets. it's different when, as you said in your entry, that people took him literally. i never thought i'd see that. i never thought i'd see a day in our country where people from either side of the political spectrum would storm the capitol in order to intentionally stop the constitutional transfer of power which is part of what was happening on wednesday. that's what's different, chuck. the country is different. maybe we can talk about that as well. it's not the same as in those previous examples. >> i want to give you a chance to response. your predecessor as chief of staff laid the blame on what he called the "let trump be trump" mindset. john kelly. >> my replacement -- let me just say, this is what happens. yesterday and other things he's done in the last two years comes

as a result of letting trump be trump. >> my replacement, let me just say, this is what happens when you say let trump be trump. i understand you had audio issues, i think you did, too. the let trump be trump mindset, in hindsight, do you wish you had figured out how to create more barriers or guardrails? >> not barriers, not guardrails. the president was the elected leader of the nation it's not the job of the chief of staff to undo that. it's the job of trying to help the president be successful which i think we were able to do. we had tremendous successes. we had record low rates of unemployment. we had no new foreign wars for the first time in my memory during a presidential term. we had tremendous things to look back on as a success because we were able to work with the president, let him be himself, but also work together to be successful. keep in mind john kelly -- i

respect john, a tremendous american. he didn't resign when he was chief of staff of the president. he warned against yes men. by the way, that is a good and sound warning. one of the things i'm afraid of is the west wing is different now than when john and i were there. the president used to love debate. he would love to get information from all sorts of different sides. i'm not sure that's happening now. and if there aren't people just there reaffirming and reamplifying what he thinks he wants them to say. >> should donald trump be ostracized from the republican party as you know it? >> i think it's going to happen anyway. i think the ideas will live on. the ideas of the republican party are bigger than one man. if you any role at all in what happened wednesday, you don't deserve to lead the party anymore. the ideas are bigger than the people. i think the voters will take that into consideration. i can't tell you -- again, i was elected in the tea party wave of 2010, sort of the precursor of the trump movement. i can't tell you the number of people who supported me for a

decade who said wednesday is a bridge too far. they love trump, love the policies, pleased with the successes of the first four years, but he lost them on wednesday. i think that's the right thing. people need to know what happened on wednesday is just different. >> mick mulvaney, the former white house chief of staff and budget director under president trump, thank you for coming on and sharing your perspective. appreciate it. >> thanks, chuck. with house democrats prepared to move on a second impeachment as early as tomorrow, i'm joined by congressman hakeem jeffries, the chairman of the house democrats. he was the democrats' floor manager during mr. trump's initial impeachment trial. well come back to "meet the press." let me start with this. what would have to happen this week that would somehow stop the house of representatives from impeaching the president? >> good morning, chuck. the assault on the capitol was a violent insurrection that was

incited and encouraged by donald trump. it was an attack on the congress, an attack on the country and an attack on the constitution, and donald trump represents a clear and present danger to the health and safety of the american people as well as our democracy. that's why house democrats are united in demanding and seeking his immediate removal. there are three ways that that can be brought about. vice president pence and a majority of the cabinet with step up and do the right thing and invoke the 25th amendment, and we're going to continue to push them to do that. we can also impeach donald trump, and he can be convicted and removed by the senate that should come back into town to deal with this constitutional crisis and the existential threat to our democracy that's sitting at 1600 pennsylvania avenue. or the republican enablers who are around donald trump can demand that he resign, similar

to what took place in the aftermath of watergate. >> well, i'm curious, by the way. do you think that if he resigned, you would remove the impeachment, it sounds like. the reason i'm asking that scenario is, he could resign, but if the goal is to prevent him from ever holding federal office again, how would you go about that without impeachment? >> the goal at the present moment is to address the existential threat that donald trump presents at this time. every second, every minute, every hour that donald trump remains in office presents a danger to the american people. donald trump may be in the twitter penalty box, but he still has access to the nuclear codes. that's a frightening prospect. so all of our efforts at the present moment are focused on his immediate removal.

that's the right thing to do. the house is a separate and coequal branch of government. we have a constitutional responsibility to serve as a check and balance on an out-of-control executive branch. donald trump is completely and totally out of control. even his longtime enablers have now come to that conclusion. >> the one member of house leadership that may have sympathetic views as yours is liz cheney on the republican side of the aisle. have you had any talks with her or like-minded house republicans about joining this effort? >> well, liz cheney and i worked closely together in the immediate aftermath of the insurrection and the assault on the capitol to make sure the members of our respective caucuses were safe and secure and received as much information as possible during the unfolding events and in the immediate aftermath of what took place.

she's involved in the process, talking to her republican colleagues about how they're going to deal with what's taking place on their side of the aisle. i'll let her speak to that. i do know that several republicans have publicly and some privately indicated that donald trump needs to be removed and this long national nightmare needs to end. part of the problem here, chuck, is that donald trump and so many republicans in the house and the senate perpetrated the big lie that joe biden did not win the election and that the presidency was being stolen. the american people have spoken. more than 80 million people voted for joe biden. the states have spoken. more than 300 electoral college votes in an electoral college landslide. the courts have spoken. more than 50 different decisions, many by trump-appointed judges. the big lie is perpetrated. that is what led to the sur rex, the coup d'etat attempt and the

assault on the capitol. so the republicans are going to have to deal with that situation moving forward once we address donald trump. >> are you going to feel safe at the inauguration? >> i will feel safe at the inauguration, and it's important for all of us to be there, in the same way that it was important for democrats and republicans to return to the house floor and the senate floor to complete our constitutional responsibilities and certify the election of joe biden. because what the insurrectionists and seditionists are attempting to do is halt normalcy, halt democracy, halt the peaceful transfer of power. that is what january 20th at high noon represents. so i will feel safe. i have confidence in our law enforcement and the secret service who are in charge of security, confidence in our speaker to make sure that members are safe and will be

there. power will be transferred. i look forward to joe biden and kamala harris's ability to provide direct relief to the american people and building back better. >> are you confident that capitol police or somebody else didn't help with this? >> well, we need a comprehensive investigation in terms of how it all unfolded. clearly the capitol police were underresourced and under prepared. there were brave men and women, including officer sicknick who fought harm, one of whom lost their lives, many of whom are injured. i'm going to lift them up today, but also make sure that those responsible for preparations are held accountable. some of whom have already indicated they're going to resign. but we need a full and complete investigation to ensure the safety and security of the american people, the safety and security of our staffs moving

forward, the safety and security of members of congress and the protection of the capitol which is really the cathedral of our democracy in this great republic. and never again should we see the type of assault that occurred this past wednesday. >> congressman hakeem jeffries, a nightmare of a week. i'm glad we got through it. thank you for coming on and shirring your perspective with us. up next, why were republicans silent for so long about the threat president trump posed? i'm going to talk to republican senator pat toomey when we come back. broken windshield... take 1...

hey guys, my windshield just got broken, i feel like i need to blow off some steam. let's go... 1, 2, 3, 4... mr. blanks? there's no need to be stressed. geico makes it easy to file a claim online, on the app, or over the phone. yeah, but what if i never hear back? that's gonna make me want to go jab...jab! nope! your geico claims team is always there for you. that makes me want to celebrate with some fireworks. 5,6,7 go... boom, boom, boom, boom boom boom boom boom boom, yeah! geico. great service without all the drama. who've got their eczema under control. with less eczema, you can show more skin. so roll up those sleeves. and help heal your skin from within with dupixent. dupixent is the first treatment of its kind that continuously treats moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis, even between flare ups.

dupixent is a biologic, and not a cream or steroid. many people taking dupixent saw clear or almost clear skin, and, had significantly less itch. don't use if you're allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur, including anaphylaxis, which is severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems, such as eye pain or vision changes, or a parasitic infection. if you take asthma medicines, don't change or stop them without talking to your doctor. so help heal your skin from within, and talk to your eczema specialist about dupixent. if your financial situation has changed, we may be able to help. welcome back. it was two years ago that a man sent 16 packages containing pipe

bombs to democrats and other perceived trump opponents. in october, the fbi arrested 13 people in connection with a plot to kidnap michigan's democratic governor gretchen whitmer. virginia's governor was also on the kidnapping list. throughout the trump presidency, journalists have been threatened by trump supporters. sadly, i can attest to that. in the wake of wednesday's event, why did so many people remain silent? joining me is republican senator pat toomey of pennsylvania. senator toomey, thank you for joining us. been a rough week. welcome back to "meet the press." >> good morning, chuck. >> let me start with this. there's calls for resignation, impeachment, removal by way of the 25th amendment. you, yourself, said he's committed impeachable offenses. in your view, what is the most appropriate way for donald trump to exit office? >> well, i think the best way for our country, chuck, is for

the president to resign and go away as soon as possible. i acknowledge that may not be likely, but i think that would be best. it does not look as though there is the will or the consensus to exercise the 25th amendment option, and i don't think there's time to do an impeachment. there's ten days left before the president leaves anyway. i think the best thing would be a resignation. >> the issue of impeachment, you have said he committed impeachable offenses and there's clearly the timing issue. one of the penalties that come with impeachment, this is almost as much about removing him from current office, but it would prevent him from ever holding federal office again assuming a majority senate vote if he's convicted, would also do that. should that be the goal? how to make sure this man never holds federal office ever again because of what he did on

wednesday? >> yeah, so chuck, a couple things. one, it's not clear the constitution permits impeachment, conviction and prohibition against ever serving again which is a separate vote, that that's permitted after a person has left office which is what would have to happen here. so whether that could be done in a binding fashion is really an open question. that's number one. number two, i would certainly hope -- and i actually do believe -- that the president has disqualified himself. i don't think he's a viable candidate for office ever again because of the outrageous behavior in the post election period. so those would be my two points. >> throughout his term, senator, you were on here quite a few times when uncomfortably he would say something or do something where i would ask you about his rhetoric. you had a consistent answer.

i want to show some folks those answers. here we go. >> i don't spend a lot of time trying to evaluate and analyze why the president comes to the conclusions he comes to. >> i don't spend a lot of time focusing on the president's tweets and things that the president says. what i focus more on is what is he going to actually do. >> i think it's a long way to attributing any kind of real link between what the president might say or tweet and the extraordinary type of madness that leads someone to massacre people. >> look, in fairness, i also want to play what you said on the senate floor this week. here's that. >> we witnessed today the damage that can result when men in power and responsibility refuse to acknowledge the truth. we saw bloodshed because a demagogue chose to spread falsehoods and sow distrust of his own fellow americans. >> senator, you know the question that's coming, and i'm

sure you've heard it from a lot of people. do you regret not speaking out sooner, and did you underestimate the threat from his rhetoric? >> chuck, i think it's important to make a distinction between the president's behavior prior to the election and his behavior after the election. for years the president said ridiculous things. he lied frequently, many objectionable things. if they were sufficiently objectionable, i did publicly weigh in, and i did many, many times. he tweeted hundreds of times a day many days, and i still don't think that i should have gone back and attempted to be his twitter editor. after the election, he took this to an entire different place, orders of magnitude different. come on. recruiting thousands of americans from around the country to descend on the capitol promising a wild ride and inciting them to attack the capitol building so as to prevent the constitutional

responsibility of the vice president and the congress to complete the peaceful transfer of power after an election, also that he could try to stay in office. that is wildly beyond anything that any of us -- certainly that i ever contemplated and anything that he did before. so i don't think that this unbelievable behavior of wednesday, for instance, could have been reasonably expected. >> you say that, and with all due respect, an entire primary campaign was waged against him in 2016 where some of the very people that support this president still, like ted cruz called him a pathological liar, worried his rhetoric was going to go in another -- and many people didn't believe it. you, yourself, you explained to me, you didn't really believe this was going to go there. i guess a lot of other folks go why?

how did you miss it? >> you know, how did half of america miss it or more than half of america? i'm sure many democrats that voted for joe biden didn't expect this was going to happen, chuck. it's because the president spiraled down into a kind of madness that was different. i'm sorry if people don't acknowledge that. i think what he did this past week is wildly different from the offensive tweets that were common during his presidency, and i don't think that those tweets clearly indicated that this was coming. >> what should -- what kind of responsibility do you hold senators hawley and cruz for what happened on wednesday? >> look, i think the -- they're going to have a lot of soul searching to do. the problem is they were complicit in the big lie, this big lie that donald trump won the election in a landslide and it was all stolen.

they compounded that with this notion that somehow this could all be reversed in the final moments of the congressional proceedings. so that's going to haunt them for a very long time. >> i know you are not crazy about what you might consider overreach. would it be overreach to kick either man out of the senate? >> i think so. i think they're going to pay a very heavy price. what they did was -- it was technically permissible under the senate rules. their voters will decide whether they get another term, and they're both young enough men that i'm sure they would certainly like to do that. so i think it should be left to the voters of their state to decide what their fate is. >> you regret your vote for president now? >> knowing what i knew then, i

think the 75 million americans making this realization between this radicalization of the democratic party and an administration that had very significant successes, i understand. it was a rational decision. nobody could have anticipated, i don't think, subsequent to the election. >> senator pat toomey, republican from pennsylvania, really appreciate you coming on and sharing your perspective with us. thank you, sir. >> thanks for having me, chuck. when we come back, one of the most extraordinary weeks in american history.

make fitness routine with pure protein. high protein. low sugar. tastes great! high protein. low sugar. so good. high protein. low sugar. mmm, birthday cake. pure protein bars and shakes. for every fitness routine. be right back. with moderate to severe crohn's disease, i was there, just not always where i needed to be. is she alright? i hope so. so i talked to my doctor about humira. i learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of crohn's disease after trying other medications.

the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief in as little as 4 weeks. and many achieved remission that can last. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores . don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible.

nbc hill capitol hill correspondent kasie hunt, senior correspondent hallie jackson, former homeland security secretary and peggy noonan. hallie, you covered this administration for the almost four years now. i understand you have news to share about what is the relationship these days between vice president pence and president trump. >> in a nutshell, chuck, it's not good. i have learned from a source familiar with this that, not only did president trump not reach out to vice president pence as the events of wednesday unfolded, and remember, the vice president was in a secure location with, by the way, members of his family, his wife, his daughter, his brother had all come to be in attendance. i'm told that the president has not called vice president pence since then. it is a striking detail. it reflects the relationship

between these two men andow acrimony ous it's become. the president spend days pressuring vice president pence publicly to do something he didn't have the constitutional authority to do on wednesday. further, chuck, just to advance the story more, it wasn't just the public pressure. i'm told back to mid december, weeks ago, they were behind the scenes maneuvering to essentially get the vice president to do what the president wanted, calls arranged with attorneys walking through different scenarios that the vice president in the eyes of the president could potentially take even though, again, as the vice president was very clear he did not have the authority to do so, chuck. as far as the 25th amendment, listen, i'm told the vice president just does not think that is practical. that's what we've been hearing and reporting from people close to him, allies, et cetera. there is real concern and anger here about how this moves forward. >> kasie hunt, how bipartisan is impeachment going to be this week? >> that's the question, chuck.

i think we're moving toward it becoming a little more bipartisan, honestly, in listening to the interview you just did with senator toomey underscores that. we're told there may have been some lawmakers who perhaps voted with the president on the electoral college question partly because they were afraid for their own safety and the safety of their families, that the calculation wasn't necessarily just a political one, which gives you a little sense of just how dramatic this was. now, the question will be how political is it perceived to be going forward. there's an increasing sense that nancy pelosi does intend to move forward with the impeachment articles this week, but they may not send them over to the senate right away because mitch mcconnell has essentially made clear that there's no way he will be able to or be willing to force the levers in such a way that would start the trial before democrats take control of the senate. so the potential is that trial

could be unfolding in the first weeks of the biden administration. the question is does the president-elect want that to be what they do first. they may hold the articles of impeachment in the house until perhaps weeks or months later. i think it's important to note there seems to potentially be enough votes in the senate to convict right now, republican votes at this moment when this is still so fresh. obviously political calculations change, but they need 17 votes, chuck. there were 92 republicans in the senate who voted to say no. president-elect biden won this election. i don't think people are willing to be extraordinarily up front about that quite yet, and there are a lot of questions about the impeachment process, but i cannot overstate the level of anger among senate republicans. >> all right, peggy and jay. your job here is to answer this question. what should happen in the next ten days.

jeh, you first. >> first i have to take issue with what senator toomey said about us not seeing this come. i've written several op-eds about how president trump's rhetoric makes unacceptable behavior acceptable and violence inevitable. my principle concern right now, chuck, is the domestic security situation which is, to say the least, tense and should be on high alert. i believe what president trump did on wednesday was worse than anything he did around russia, anything he did around ukraine, any phone call he made to the georgia secretary of state. if i were in the house, i would vote to impeach. if i were in the senate, i would vote to convict. i do, however, question the necessity given the current climate of holding that vote over the next week and a half, particularly when mcconnell has said that the trial will not occur until after january 20. i think we need -- i think there

are additional considerations here. the goal is to disqualify him from holding federal office. there is precedent for holding such a trial after the person leaves office. >> peggy, what's your prescription? >> my read quickly is that we are in a crisis. this coming week could not be more consequential, more weighted with history. from everything i hear, there are still active conversations going in washington with regard to the 25th amendment and whether or not the president should be essentially judged to be incapacitated. that is amazing enough. or, another road, second impeachment. he's already been impeached once. i would take any of the above because i believe the president should leave. i believe he is a danger. but very quickly on impeachment, my thoughts are this, first of

all, he's dangerous. he should be impeached because he's showing every sign that on the way out, he'd like to pull down a few more pillars. we don't know how he's spending his days, who is around him. it doesn't seem to be a lot of people or a lot of first-rate people and real serious counselors. so there's that danger. i think he breached the constitution when his supporters breached the grounds of the capitol. so i think there's just straight out reason to remove him. i think future presidents may need to know what the exact boundaries are for presidential behavior. it wouldn't be bad to show them this week. i also think, you know, president trump at this point, he simply deserves exceptional dishonor and a second impeachment would be an exceptional dishonor. i hope the republican party does

not miss this moment. they should move forward. i think the impeachment should be bipartisan. it will be the only way for it to be really pretty fully accepted, but understood and respected by history. both parties said no more. >> a bipartisan impeachment threat is what got nixon to resign. perhaps if a bunch of republicans gruesome spines in the next 24 hours and they knew it was coming, maybe, just maybe he would take that route. i'm going to pause right there. when we come back, the ways in which the far right is trying to blame wednesday's violence on the far le stock slices.

for as little as $5, now anyone can own companies in the s&p 500, even if their shares cost more. at $5 a slice, you could own ten companies for $50 instead of paying thousands. all commission free online. schwab stock slices: an easy way to start investing or to give the gift of stock ownership. schwab. own your tomorrow.

don't settle for silver #1 for diabetic dry skin* #1 for psoriasis symptom relief* and #1 for eczema symptom relief* gold bond champion your skin i do motivational speakingld. in addition to the substitute teaching. i honestly feel that that's my calling-- to give back to younger people. i think most adults will start realizing that they don't recall things as quickly as they used to or they don't remember things as vividly as they once did. i've been taking prevagen for about three years now. people say to me periodically, "man, you've got a memory like an elephant." it's really, really helped me tremendously. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. . welcome back. wednesday's violence was shocking. thousands of pro trump

protesters wearing maga hats, trashing the building and leaving five people dead and many more injured. even before it was possible to take stock of the damage done by the pro-trump mob, the far right eco media ecosystem saying it was antifa that sacked the capitol. absurd? yes, of course. harmless? not at all. almost immediately after reports that the capitol had been breached, televangelist mark burns, a long time trump supporters tweeted this is not a trump supporter, a staged antifa attack. the votto is jake angeli who is known as the q shaman. trump's son eric liked the tweet. about 7,000 posts on twitter referred to antifa protesters posing as trump followers.

thousands of likes and retweets. from social media those same talking points migrated to conservative tv talk. >> i think a lot of it is the antifa folks. >> they were likely not all trump supporters. there are some reports that antifa sympathizers may have been sprinkled throughout the crowd. >> we see serious indications that antifa and outside infiltrators could be involved in all of this. >> and when congress reconvened after the mayhem that night to finish counting the electoral votes, florida republican congressman matt gates had the audacity to blame antifa on the house floor. and yet in truth, the fbi said friday there is no indication antifa took part in any part of the attack. for days, trump supporters and qanon followers made their january 6th intentions crystal clear. the phony, don't blame us, narrative is one of many given oxygen by a news environment

that allows audiences to live in their own alternative reality comfort zones. this is not happening on the dark web. it is in plain sight, on channels that you and your family interact with every day and somehow claim to be fair. when we come back, the destruction we saw these are real people, not actors, who've got their eczema under control. with less eczema, you can show more skin. so roll up those sleeves. and help heal your skin from within with dupixent. dupixent is the first treatment of its kind that continuously treats moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis, even between flare ups. dupixent is a biologic, and not a cream or steroid. many people taking dupixent saw clear or almost clear skin, and, had significantly less itch. don't use if you're allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur, including anaphylaxis, which is severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems,

such as eye pain or vision changes, or a parasitic infection. if you take asthma medicines, don't change or stop them without talking to your doctor. so help heal your skin from within, and talk to your eczema specialist about dupixent. if your financial situation has changed, we may be able to help. we look at how much you've saved, how much you'll need, and build a straightforward plan to generate income, even when you're not working. a plan that gives you the chance to grow your savings and create cash flow that lasts. along the way, we'll give you ways to be tax efficient. and you can start, stop or adjust your plan at any time without the unnecessary fees. talk to us today, so we can help you go from saving...to living.

high protein. low sugar. tastes great! high protein. low sugar. so good. high protein. low sugar. mmm, birthday cake. try pure protein shakes. with vitamins and minerals for immune support.

let's have trial by combat! >> stand up and fight! >> today is the day american patriots start taking down names and kicking ass! >> that was the rhetoric that the trump protesters heard before the mob was created and stormed the capitol. kasie hunt, what is the future of mo brooks, josh hawley and ted cruzn th i united states

congress? >> well, chuck, i think it's still an open question, but again, i think that their colleagues felt in a way that they have not experienced before, even after four years of the trump administration. they were personally in danger, and the rhetoric that these -- some of their fellow members as well as the president of the united states offered on wednesday is what led directly to the mob, and it was an extraordinary close call in the senate, chuck. the doors were shut just one minute, essentially, before the mob reached the doors into the chamber. and some of those heroic actions are what protected the place. i think while many critics will say, of course, it's too little, too late for the republican party. i think senator toomey reflected the deposition of the change that has happened there. for those of us who have covered or worked in those hallowed halls for a very, very long time, it's impossible to

overstatethe degree to which this shook faith in a system that everyone is supposed to be bought into. chuck. >> that's where i want to go here, guys. is this the beginning of something or the end of something? jeh johnson, i want you to react to something wrote in the atlantic. "the washington post" described them as would-be saboteurs of a 244-year-old democracy. true deck october see in america some 55 years old, dating back to 1965, the year the voting rights act guaranteed suffrage, at least on paper, to all citizens regardless of race. we've actually had 55 years, a precarious multiracial democracy in this country. what say you, jeh johnson? >> chuck, of the many images, shocking images from wednesday, i think the one that most jolted me was the image shown earlier on this program of the

confederate flag being paraded through the u.s. capitol. i have ancestors, my great, great grandmother's brother fled slavery in virginia when he was a teenager. here he is, and enlisted in the u.s. union army to prevent exactly that from happening. we fought an entire civil war to prevent that from happening. >> peggy noonan, the amount of anti-semites, racists that were frankly i guess mainstreamed by donald trump over the last few years has rattled a lot of people's concern about whether this democracy is going to hold up. what say you? >> oh, i say america with its barbaric yalp can shock us and upset us very often. we do manage to hold on, and i expect that will be true, but i

think for a lot of people the indelible image of this week is the idea that the capitol, this great and grand building, the one we put on post cards, if you visit washington, d.c. and write home, that it could be overrun by vandals in a moment, that an action could be taken and elected leaders are fleeing for their lives. i think this was a shock to so many people, especially to the young to whom we have to show we don't allow this. we stop that right now. we stopped it this week. >> i hope so. hallie jackson, what happens to donald trump on january 21st? >> he doesn't go anywhere, chuck. physically, obviously, he's gone from the white house. he'll be presumably in florida, but i have to tell you, this is a president who is so defiant. these calls, these ideas that

perhaps he would resign, it is at this exact moment in time almost unthinkable to see how the president would currently retreat in the face of pressure, something he has almost never before done, certainly not when the stakes are this high. i thought it was interesting that senator toomey earlier described it as not viable that the president could have another shot in 2024. there are president in and around the white house who believe the same, that the president has disqualified himself. perhaps he'll say he will run. there's not a real sense that he could have an actual shot. although, people, the people who support him, the people who he has activated over the last four years, they are with him until the end. that group is not going anywhere. the president will take advantage of a media ecosystem, not mainstream media, but an ecosystem that will give him oxygen for years to come. >> right. if that is what happens and this republican party allows donald trump to still be an influential figure, it will end up in the

ash bin of history. that's all for today. thank you for watching. we're going to be back next week, this democracy intact. if it's sunday, it's "meet the press."

capitol riot comes the reckoning, the new push to impeach president trump for the second time. as authorities charge dozens more involved in the insurrection. e holiday surge in coronavirus, the mark of a year since the first death since the coronavirus. >> and first win in 30 years "early today" starts now