yamiche: new january 6 revelations. and the questions surrounding russia's military. >> and so we intend to find out what calls were made and piece together the truth. yamiche: key records reveal a 7 1/2 hour gap in former president trump's white house phone logs on january 6. >> the white house has decided not to assert executive privilege over the testimony of jared cushner. yamiche: meanwhile trump's son-in-law and former white house advisor testifies before the house committee investigating the capitol attack. plus -- pres. biden: today i'm authorized the release of one million barrels per day for the next six months. yamiche: president biden takes new steps to bring down u.s. gas prices. and russian president vladimir putin drafts 135,000 russians to

join the military as his forces continue to pound ukraine. next. announcer: this is "washington week." corporate funding is provided b- >> for 25 years, consumer cellular's goal has been to provide wireless service that helps people communicate and connect. we offer a variety of no contract plans and our u.s.-based customer service team can help find one that fits you. to learn more visit consumercellular.tv. announcer: additional funding is provided by the estate of arnold adams, koo and patricia yuen through the yuen foundation, committed to bridging cultural differences in our communities, sandra and carl delay-magnuson, rose hirschel and andy shreeves, robert and susan rose balm, the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you.

once again, from washington, moderator yamiche alcindor. yamiche: good evening and welcome to "washington week." this week, there was so much news related to the january 6 investigation. the house committee is still trying to figure out what exactly former president trump was doing when his supporters were storming the u.s. capitol. and key documents revealed a nearly eight-hour gap and official white house phone logs from that day. here's what democrat adam schiff had to say about the mystery. >> we're putting all the pieces together and exactly what was the president doing and more importantly as it would turn out what was he failing to do during the time when the capitol was under attack? yamiche: meanwhile, representative liz cheney, the president vice chair of the january 6 committee, emphasized the importance of the work lawmakers are doing. >> if the country does not commit to investigating and pursuing accountability for

those responsible, the court fears january 6 will repeat itself. yamiche: and on thursday, jared cushner, trump's son-in-law and former top white houseisor, testified before the committee for roughly seven hours. it's still unclear exactly what he said. meanwhile, earlier this week, a federal judge said former president trump when trying to overturn the 20200 -- 2020 election more likely than not committed a felony. joining me tonight to discuss this and more jacqueline alemany. subcommittee is the congress coespondent and author of the "washington post" newsletter the "early 202". here with me in studio jonathan lemire, white house bureau chief for politico and the white house of "way too early" for msnbc. and michael shear, white house correspondent for "the new york times. thank you all for being here. jonathan, i want to start with you. there was so much news about these white house call logs, a big mystery here. what's the significance of these missing call logs given the fact

that there is still so much that lawmakers are trying to figure outbout january 6? jonathan: obviously the january 6 committee is trying to figure out exactly what the president was doing that day as his supporters were storming the capitol. and we know from media reports, from accounts offered by lawmakers and aides that he was working the phones for at least part of that day, that he had retreat for the most part, a private dining room just off the oval office. he's in there and a bank of televisions and watching what was going on and per witnesses seemingly pleased by a lot of what he saw, and we know he was making phone calls. but yet knows calls aren't showing up in the logs. that's raising a lot of questions. now, we know and michael covered the trump white house as well that he was prone to using his personal cell phone. he was prone sometimes using just whatever phone he can get his hands on. sometimes grabbing them from aides and asking let me grab that i'll use that for my whatever call i need to make right now. so the committee is certainly wondering what happened to those call logs? is it a matter of the president wasn't using the official white house phones? wasn't using the white house switchboard? or did something else happen? was someone trying to scrub the

records to conceal what happened off the oval office that day? yamiche: and michael, as jonathan said we all covered the trump administration together, the wild ride that we took together. but it could be easily explained that the president was just using cell phones but there's also this idea that there is reporting in real time that lawmakers were trying to reach him. kevin mccarthy and others trying to get him to do something to stop his supporters from storming the capitol. michael: right. and i think -- i think one of the things that it underscores is just how difficult these investigations really are to conduct, right? on the surface it might seem you interview a bunch of people who were in and you sort of -- have subpoena support to bring and talk -- and not that easy. they've obviously run into legal roadblocks already. people like steve bannon and others who have said they won't talk to the committee. but in addition, you run into this kind of roadblock where jonathan said it's not exactly clear the cause of the missing time. is it really in a he didn't make a single call? i think a lot of russ pretty

skeptical given the reporting and the history that he wouldn't have made any calls through the white house switchboard. but as jonathan said and you pointed out, he -- it was a chaotic environment. this is not a -- that wasn't a disciplined administration. it wasn't a disciplined presidency. who knows what went on in the dining room? and i think those are the difficulties that as the committee and then obviously later the justice department are trying to piece together this puzzle, when you don't have a piece, it's difficult. yamiche: michael, i have you on because you so eloquently describe how the trump white house operated. jackie -- understatement. jackie, i want to bring you in. you told our producers that you're focused on the chain of custodys? as well. what does your reporting reveal about what it means that we know so much about what the president was doing that day? jacqueline: yeah. i'm not sure i'm going to be able to phrase it as eloquently as michael did. but this is to be candida president who did not have much regard for the presidential

records act or for the processes that have been in place for decades now. as we reported a few months ago, this was a president who took 15 boxes of presidential records that should have been archived with the national archival records administration to mara lago that had to confiscated and retrieved from his shome a year after inauguration. so it is no surprise that he potentially was not following protocol on january 6. but there are still so many unanswered questions here. we -- there were various data streams in order to produce a presidential call log of that day. there's the white house switchboard report. there is the presidential dirist. there's also the staff secretary. so the questions are, who was actually recording the call log that day? who did they share it with? who presented it to the white house office of records management? and all up and down again as you noted the change of custody, we need to know who these calls went flew exactly.

but i did speak with a bunch of sources this week after our colleagues published ts, these documents who said that it certainly raised a lot of questions that there wasn't necessarily a page break. but that there was one page that ended and another page that started. and a lack of page numbers. obviously if there was a cover-up that raises a lot of new legal avenues here. but that is something that we have not yet determined. and i think that the people involved with these prosses as well are still trying to determine. yamiche: jackie, sticking with you, you talked about the different avenues. i wonder if you could also give us some insight into what -- what's the information and documents that lawmakers are still wanting to get their hands on to try to get more insig into the january 6 investigation? jacqueline: well, as you can probably tell from watching this week closely, this has been a big week for the committee. as they're trying to move quickly toward a month of public hearings in may. so basically they have one month left to wrap up their depositions and interviews.

yes, they've already conducted over 800 interviews with individuals and witnesses who had some role on january 6 or in the events leading up to the january 6 insurrection. but there are also a lot of big names that they have yet to tick off. people like ivanka trump. scott perry. jim jordan. house minority leader kevin mccarthy. they did get jared cushner to sit down today. but there are still some big people who were really close to the president and more specifically, close to him on the actual day of january 6. people like peter navarro and dan scavenge who were maybe the most intimately involved with some of the schemes to overthrow the results of the election who have yet to cooperate and so the committee at this point in time is really focused on trying to run as many of these loose ties down as possible before transitioning to the public phase. yamiche: and jonathan, jackie just really teed up my next question which is about jared cushner. he wasn't in the country at the

time but we do know that jared cushner was such a close -- you call him a close ally but literally family, an in-law of the president, working at the white house. why is his testimony important? why is hearing from him important if he wasn't actually at the white house on january 6? jonathan: he was coming back from sawed razorback on janry 6. he never made it to the white house that day. and at the election, he pivoted largely to the administration's efforts in the middle east. so on. but he of course was still there. he is family as you mentioned. married to ivanka trump of course. he is the -- at this point the highest ranking white house official to testify and as well the only member of the family so far to do so. and democrats afterward said he did so willingly. he said he was friendly and helpful. now, we don't know or get much about what was said there. although i'll say willingly -- and helpful not words we associate with the trump administration. so far with this committee. so that in itself is noteworthy. and even if you can't point to first-hand witness accounts what the president was doing that day, he certainly could talk to state of mind and the run-up to

that moment. from election day on, we know he was there in the early morning hours of election night through the sixth and can testify to the making to overturn those results. yamiche: and michael, all of this is happening, all these sort of new information we had a judge this week say as we noted that president trump more likely than not committed a felony. how does all of these new details ramp up pressure on the d.o.j., on attorney general merrick garland to be prosecuting president trump or people around him, former president trump or people around him him? michael: it definitely ramps up the pressure on the attorney general, the justice department has obviously gone after kind of the low-level folks, the people who were at the -- who were at the capitol and actually stormed the capitol. there's hundreds of prosecutions of those. but in terms of the planning and in terms of going after the people who are in the president's orbit and around the president and obviously the president himself, that hasn't happened yet. there is a lot of real angst among the president's -- you

know, president biden's hard core supporters who are like, look, this is why we elected you, to make -- to hold this man accountable, to hold the people around president trump accountable. what's happening? why is it taking so long? and so i think, you know, the more that you have a judge saying that, you know, he's concluded that the president might have committed felonies, the more you have information coming out from the committee that suggests that there's a real case there. the harder it is for merrick garland and president biden who frkly both of them i think in a perfect world would like nothing to do with this, right? it's a very -- it's a hot potato and very pitical. president biden obviously has his own agenda to pursue. and so, you know, it's a real political situation that -- you know, i think in an ideal world they wouldn't want to deal with. yamiche: january 6 is a hot potato is another great michael shear metaphor and i have to note that and you're 2-2 now. and also on friday, with all this news going on, president

biden announced that in march, the u.s. economy added 431,000 jobs. pres. biden: more jobs created over the first 14 months of any presidency in any term ever. and more and more americans get jobs as they do it's going to help ease the supply pressures we've seen. and that's good news for fighting inflation. yamiche: with mid-terms approaching a new nbc news poll shows that 38% of americans blame the president for inflation while just 6% blame russia. this is i think in some ways really, really interesting. jackie, waibt to come to you -- i want to come to you because you make of the fact that the president and democrats year overall trying to talk about the econy in a good way and taking the wins while also trying to tell people we understand your struggle and we need to stay in power so please vote for us in the midterms? jacqueline: it is yet another hot potato, a dramatically different one for the democrats, one that they have been astutely aware of, especially

congressional democrats as we've reported in the last few weeks. they had a strategy conference that was actually delayed because of some of these disagreements over the messaging. but this is what a lot of democrats view as really the biggest barrier to the president's approval ratings. the fact that the administration and democrats on the hill can't come to some sort of cohesive messaging where they are able to strike a balance and able to, you know, consistently let americans know what they have done so far. they've passed a huge bipartisan infrastructure package. a lot of economists who believe that this is actually going to alleviate a lot of inflationary pressures. but americans are still waiting. and so it's up to democrats to end -- and the president first and foremost to be able to communicate that exactly as you said. we feel your pain. but x, y, z is coming down the line and you're seeing them take measures day in and day out, most recently withegard to the

oil reserves. yamiche: the oil reserves is my next question. the biggest withdrawal in the strategic oil reserves more than 46-year history, jonathan. the release would be 180 million barrels in total of oil. what's the white house thinking about this when you think about the fact that the president is taking this big step but also i wonder what are they thinking in terms of the impact that this will have on not only on u.s. prices but around the world? because this is focused on trying to make up for some of the russian oil that's not going to be used. jonathan: this was simply about needing to could -- to do something. the president was pretty candid he wasn't sure when this would really impact the price at the pump. he wasn't sure how much of a help this would actually be. and it points to the political bind here. and every time we talk about gas prices, democrats, president biden, always putin's price hike and trying to blame of course the russian president and the invasion of ukraine for the jump in prices. but of course as polling suggests, this president is going to take a lot of blame

here and just the nature -- he's at the helm. he's going to take the blame. the buck stops with him. in the mind of americ voters. so they are aware of this and even though the president has received high marks from most foreign policy experts, some even republins as to how he's handled the war in ukraine, that hasn't trickled down to his poll numbers in the united states. they're still pretty low. and inflation seems to be and pocketbook issues for americans day-to-day, at least at this moment, seem to be the driving force or will be the driving foe for the midterms this year and worrisome for democrats and the president is trying to get out ahead of this and show, look, i'll doing the best we can. michael: and i was talking to somebody at the white house today and look, there is some indication that american interest in the war overseas which had peaked obviously, such an intense crisis, you know, now the war is sort of in this grinding phase whe, you know, the ukrainians gain the -- the russians gain, that there is going to be a waning of interest generally and a refocus son these pocketbook issues and

inflation in particular. and i think they -- i think the white house is well-aware of that. and determined to keep the president on message doing things that they can -- that the americans can see him doing at least that -- so that they see that he's trying. yamiche: yeah. well, thank you so much, jackie, for joining us, and for sharing your reporting. and as michael was saying, there was all this news of course on the foreign front. the russian invasion of ukraine is entering its sixth week. there are reports that russian soldiers are low on morale and weapons. and the biden administration says russian president vladimir putin is being misinformed about the state of his military by his closest advisors. meanwhile, president biden doubled down on the statement he made in poland last weekend that president, bute -- president putin, quote, cannot remain in power. pres. biden: i was expressing my outrage at the behavior of this man. it's outrageous, outrageous and it's more an aspiration than

anything he shouldn't be in power. yamiche: joining the conversation, nancy youssef, correspondent for "the wall street journal" and thank you so much for being here. so russian military officials this week said that they are regrouping. there was this big draft. but they're also still doubling down and pounding away at ukraine. i wonder what's the world learned this week in particular, maybe over the course of this war, about russia's military capabilities? nancy: it's a great question. because here in week five, we heard the russians say during peace talks in istanbul that they were prepared to draw dow their forces in places like kyiv and the north and wanted to show good faith effort toward a peace deal. but what we saw on the ground was a russian force that was in fact repositioning its forces. these forces weren't going home. they were going to other places, particularly in eastern ukraine, trying to learn and regroup from the losses of the first five weeks. logistical challenges they've

had, the inability to hold territory, and i think what we saw from the russians as well, they said they were withdrawing, they continued striking places like kyiv with air strikes, rather than trying to get out of the war, i think we saw a -- russia trying to get itself in position to redefine success as not taking the whole country but the eastern part of the country and putting its forces in a better position to do that after a lot of mistakes in the first five weeks of this war. yamiche: and jonathan, there was also this news that russia accused ukraine of launching a helicopter attack on a fuel depot on russian soil. now, ukraine is saying that's not true. that they did not do that. but i wonder how concerning this development is when you think about the fact that there are these peace talks going on and some are worried that russia is sort of trying to have -- use false flags to get ready to inflict even more pain on people? jonathan: from the first hours of this war u.s. officials and western allies have warned about exactly this. that russia might stage a false flag attack, blame it on ukraine

or in some scenarios perhaps a nato ally and use that as an excuse to escalate the violence. and certainly biden administration officials that we've talked to all week long and we've heard from the president himself are very skeptical about moscow's good faith efforts to have any kind of peace talks right now. any sort of cease-fire agreement. though some troops today, seems like russian troops have indeed pulled away from kyiv. but as they're not going home. they're just heading to other regions and they're still continuing the long-range bombardment -- bombardments of kyiv and not like peace has come to those areas and seems like putin is trying to capture the east, the donbos region, kremlin backed separatist movements to strengthen his negotiating hand down the road. and it is clear the lightning strike to take down the country, that didn't happen. so now putin with pressure at home, pressure from economic sanctions may be shifting his goals. but there's no sign that this war is going to end anytime soon. yamiche: and nancy, i want to come back to you. what's the peng's view -- the

pentagon's view of how russia could use these peace talks to gain an advantage militarily? nancy: i think their fear is russians are signaling in places like istanbul that they will -- they want to enter a peace deal. but exploiting the talks as a way to reposition their forces such that they can make gains, not only for the donbos in the short-term but potentially go after places like kyiv again. and so i think -- their concern is you could see russia actually maneuver toward these key points of the country again and not enter a peace deal. i think the other concern that they have is that saz russia has suffered these losses, and they have been surprising and humiliating in many cases, that russia will use more erving latory attacks to gain ground in the absence of a strong ground force, a joint effort by its navy and air force to strike in ukraine and that there are fear that is down the road we could see chemical attacks or other weapons of mass destruction in a bid by russia to regain ground

in the absence of being able to do it on -- according to s original military planning. yamiche: and nancy, sticking with you, there were -- there was a call, virtual call between president biden and ukrainian president vladimir zelensky, i wonder, has there been any sort of evolution on what the u.s. and the west are willing to do for ukraine as this war drags on? or is it sort of tension, that tension continuing to grow among this leader and what sort of ukraine wants versus what they're going to get? nancy: i think it's the latter, that there continues to be tension. because the u.s. has said that this is a fight for democracy. and yet has been unwilling to actually prevail. the u.s. has instead sent a lot of defensive weapons, stingers, and other defensive weapons in a bid to help ukraine. but not enough to let them prevail. the u.s. concern is that if they send offensive weapons this will be seen as an escalation by the

united states toward russia and potentially expand the war. the challenge is that you see a ukrainian force that has been far more successful than many anticipated, has made territorial grounds even though they've had a disadvantage in terms of the types of weapons, that number of forces, and certainly the ukrainian request is if the west sees this as a threat to democracy, then the west should be providing every weapon possible to help them prevail in this war. what we're seeing from both russia and ukraine this week in particular is that for all their talks during the peace talks in istanbul, i think both sides continue to believe that they can prevail in this war and i think what you heard from president zelensky was a plea to the united states to help him achieve that goal. yamiche: michael, i want to turn to -- a subject that's related but also just we're living almost -- pulled back into the

trump years. president trump this week called on vladimir putin to find a -- alleged sort of dirt essentially on hunter biden, president biden's son. what's that say about the politics of all this? we're talking about sort of what's going on with russia and ukraine but also the domestic politics and the former president continuing to swirl around here? michael: well, that's true. you know, i think that what the former president's antics, i guess, you might call it, bringing -- bringing this kind of stuff up and talking to vladimirutin, you know, via social media and whatever, it underscores a problem for the republican party, right? the traditional repubcan party pre-trump was very strong on russia. it prided itself on taking a strong stand against, you know, russia and russian aggression. and now they've got -- they spent four years with donned

trump, you know, essentially coddling up to him and, you know, and so now you have a problem for republicans who have to, you know, kind of campaign in a setting where they've got the former president you know not being on message essentially. yamiche: well, it's remarkable and something that we're going to have to keep watching because president biden himself said that other countries are wondering is president -- former president trump going to be back anytime soon? so so much to talk about. thank you so much to nancy, jonathan and michael for sharing your reporting and joining us. we'll continue our conversation on the "washington week" extra. this week's topic, the emmett till anti-lynching act which was signed into law, find it on our website, facebook and youtube and tune in tomorrow to the launch of pbs news weekend with jeff bennett every weekend. that program will bring you the latest news on politics, culture, and much more. thank you so much for joining us. i'm yamiche alcindor. good night from washington:

announcer: corporate funding for "washington week" is provided b. additional funding is provided by the estate of arnold adams, koo and patricia yuen through the yuen foundation, committed to bridging cultural differences in our communities, sandra and carl delay-magnuson, rose hirschel and andy shreeves, robert and susan rose balm, the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. [captioning performed by the. national captioning institute,. which is responsible for its. caption content and accuracy.]

(dramatic orchestral music) (narrator) victoria. ♪ the royal who invented the modern monarchy. ♪ queen who made britain an empire. (prof. kathryn hughes) victoria's britain is ruling the waves, ruling the world. (narrator) but who was the real woman beneath the crown? in this series, we discover victoria as we've never seen her before: a sensuous young queen... ♪ ("victoria") he clasped me in his arms and we kissed each other, again and again. (narrator) ...a reluctant mother of nine... (dr. priya atwal) victoria definitely didn't like babies. almost grosses her out to see her own children. (tense music) (narrator) ...a devastated widow... (dr. annie gray) she was suicidal, absolutely. she was inconsolable. (narrator) ...and a passionate wife.