yamiche: russia warns the west in the fight over midterm messaging. pres. biden: i called it genocide because it is becoming clearer and clearer that putin is trying to wipe out the idea of being ukrainian. yamiche: president biden raises the stakes, calling out russia for its brutal slaughter of ukrainian civilians. >> ukraine need supplies, anything to repel russian forces and stop the war crimes. yamiche: president zelinski pleads for even more weapons from western allies as russian forces prepare for a major assault on eastern ukraine. plus -- pres. biden: i am doing everything within my power by executive orders to bring down the prices. yamiche: president biden takes his message to key states, while

inflation hits a new 40 year high. if joe biden keeps shipping illegal immigrants into the states, we will all have to learn spanish. my message to biden, no way, jos e. yamiche: ahead of the midterms, republicans double, down on culture wars, next. ♪ >> this is "washington week." corporate funding is provided by -- >> 425 years, consumer cellular's goal has been provide service. are u.s.-based service team can help you find a plan that fits you. to learn more, visit consumercellular.tv. >> addition funding is provided by -- sandra and carl delay magnuson.

rose marshall and andy shreve's. robert and susan rosenbaum. the corporation for public broadcasting. and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. >> once again from washington, moderator yamiche alcindor. yamiche: good evening and welcome to "washington week." the russian invasion of ukraine is entering its eighth week and the fallout over the atrocities committed against civilians has reached new levels. this week, president biden for the first time called the actions of russian president putin "genocide." president biden announced additional 800 million dollars in new military supplies to ukraine, including heavy artillery and helicopters. >> all of them are designed to help ukraine in the fight that they are in right now and the

fight that they will be in, in coming days and weeks. yamiche: that cos as russia warned that u.s. and nato shipments of weapons to ukraine could bring "unpredictable consequences." meanwhile, in a dramatic new step, european union officials are drafting a proposed ban on russian oil products, though no agreement has been reached yet on the issue. still, president putin rejected the idea that russia can be cut off from the world economy. >> we are not going to be isolated. no one can be isolated in the modern world. moreover, it is impossible to do this to a country as huge as russia. yamiche: joining me tonight to discuss this and more, peter baker, chief correspondent for the new york times, eugene daniels, co-author of politicos playbook, and marianna sotomayor , congressional reporter for the washington post. thank you for being here. peter, i want to start with you. you were a moscow bureau chief

for a long time. the big news is that president biden changed his language and for the first time called what is happening in ukraine a genocide. take us inside the decision to change his language here and what impact, if any, it could have. peter: the important thing to remember is it is a political statement rather than a legal statement. president biden says in his opinion this counts as genocide. there is a whole set of international law here that lawyers will apply at some point or another. there is some debate about whether this would qualify. genocide, according to the law, would be trying to wipe out an entire people. you can debate whether that is what putin's goal is here. the true is the goal is to wipe out the idea of ukraine as a separate nation and of the idea of ukrainians as a separate people. that is a broader definition of genocide then we have traditionally talked about. he wrote a piece that was published last year saying ukraine is not a separate nation. he wrote it is simply a part of russia and they should not get

status of being their own people. in that sense, he is trying to wipe out the very idea. what he is doing, president biden, is escalating the rhetoric, whether you call it genocide or crimes against amenity. he is putting putin on notice that there will be accountability when this is over. we don't know how the accountability will take place. it doesn't look like you can send international cops to moscow. but there is this idea that russia and vladimir putin will have to be held accountable for the crimes that have been committed. yamiche: eugene, peter is talking about escalating rhetoric. there was increasing aid this week. how much of this language change and wanting to call it a genocide do we think influenced the idea and the decision by president biden to send more aid to ukraine as the country is continuing to plead for even more weapons? eugene: one of the things we have seen as this conflict, this invasion, has continued, you are

starting to see president biden getting ahead in his language. this is one piece of it. when he talked about about it, they have made clear, the administration, that these are not changes, no change of policy. but it does show you that as he gets more frustrated, we will continue to give more aid to ukraine, more military assistance to ukraine and ukrainians. that is what ukraine and vladimir zelinski want to see -- bilot zelenskyy want to see. they want to continue to put pressure on russia. we saw vladimir putin talking about napping able to be cut off. he has also been surprised about the resilience of ukraine and the amount of assistance given from both the united states and european countries. as this continues, and it does

not seem like it will end anytime soon, every official i talked to here in the united states says that is going to continue to up. every time it gets worse, we will continue to give every kind of aid we can without increasing the dangers for americans and nato. yamiche: marianna, eugene is talking about the prolonged war and this going much longer than a lot of officialshought it would go. of course congress was out this week, i know that is your beat, so i want to ask you, what is going on in terms of congress for where lawmakers' minds are, and is there bipartisan agreement on the way forward? marianna: the fact that this is going to go on for a long time is exactly what is at the forefront of their minds. right now, they are not necessarily talking about how much money they should be sending to ukraine. they already did that in an aid package last month. but they are starting to think that at some point they are going to have to do that again,

and what that looks like is probably going to start to be under discussion when they come back into session at the end of this month into next month. that of course can look like funding for nola terry equipment. that is -- for military equipment. that is something big, where zelenskyy is making that plea. not to mention the fact that they need that humanitarian aid as well. zelenskyy has done a really good job anytime he has briefed lawmakers to really make an emotional appeal. that is, as we have seen the last couple months, really triggered members into action. it is rare nowadays to see anything pass in a bipartisan manner or have overwhelming support, and you really see that here on this issue. it is likely that more things will come up as this issue continues to be at the forefront. yamiche: peter, as marianna is talking about the thinking of lawmakers, i want to come to you as our russia expert to talk about that thinking possibly of

president putin. we see russian military forces regrouping. just this week, we saw an important russian warship sank. russia is saying it is an accidental fire. ukraine is saying b they hit it with missiles. what do we know about president putin's thinking of the overall war as a possible miscalculation? peter: it is a good question, and we don't know what is in his head. it has been a serious miscalculation on every front. they thought they could simply waltz into ukraine and within a few days or weeks, have it all wrapped up. we reported this, that 30% to 50% of the craney army, they thought would switch sides. that did not happen, obviously. they thought they could drive a wedge within the west. nato is more unified today than it has been in years. they thought they could drive the united states and the west out of eastern europe, or at least send a signal they should

get out. now you see finland and sweden, who never joined during the cold war, now talking about joining nato. on every front, vladimir putin has succeeded in doing the opposite of what he says he wants to do. now they are regrouping. they seem to be focusing more on the east, looking for some way of getting a win out of this. if they can carve out part of ukraine in the east and say, this is the part where russian speakers live the most so we are going to focus on that, that might be his plan b at this point. ukraine won't accept that. president zelenskyy has made clear that ukrainian territory is ukrainian territory. it is bad enough they have had to live for eight years with russia seizing contr of crimea and the eastern don bass region -- the eastern donbas region. if that is what president putin thinks is going to happen, he will probably be in for many years of fighting to come, whether on a formal battlefield or a guerrilla resistance. he has put himself and his

country in a place that is unenviable and without an easy out. yamiche: unenviable is a way to put it, when you think about russia's stance here and their position. eugene, i want to come to you because these atrocities that we continue to learn about are just heartbreaking. ju this week, we saw the bodies of 900, more than 900 civilians were found in areas right outside ukraine's capital. when you think about it, as this war deepens, what is the biden administration's thinking when it comes to possibly sending an official over there to be on the ground in ukraine? eugene: one of the things that my colleagues at politico scooped this week is that the administration was having internal discussions about sending a high-level official to kyiv to show support for ukraine, upping the amount of face time we have been giving to ukraine. who that is, it is very unclear.

we are talking about high-vel officials that make sense. you have obviously president biden, though jen saki yesterday said they were not sending president biden to ukraine. you also have vice president, la harris, who was in --, -- vice president kamala harris. they are probably not going to tell many people if they do pull the trigger on that. what we are told is that can also change, depending on how the war continues to play out, how dangerous it is or how safe it can be made for our high-level officials. the administer she does feel external pressure -- the administration does feel external pressure, when you see boris johnson walking the streets of kyiv, to do more. sit there, foot on the soil, and see firsthand what we have seen

in pictures and vide ever since because as this war continues, one thing that administration officials happen thinking about is how do we keep the coalition together? one of those ways is to continue to show extreme support, continuing to show that you are willing to do more than y were doing before, and this would certainly be an escalation when it comes to symbolism in this invasion. yamiche: marianna, what is congress thinking about what they can do to do more, when you hear eugene thinking about what the white house thinking as? what are lawmakers talking about? how can they make this even more painful for russia? marianna: to that exact point, congresswoman sparse, republican from indiana, who is also born and raised in ukraine, she has been asking the administration to send someone to ba.2 contact in ukraine. -- to send someone to be a contact in ukraine.

the senate has actually already passed this procedural legislation that would help ease and streamline any arms shipments the u.s. may want to send to ukraine. that is something the house may consider in these upcoming weeks when they are back in session. something else democrats both in the senate and the house have been talking about, some have introduced legislation on, is how can they undo some tax breaks for american companies that are still doing business with russia? they are trying to find other ways to hurt russia, even though vladimir putin has said in a sanctions, and he cannot make setbacks -- and the economic setbacks are not being felt. congress is trying to be ahead and trying to find those ways to hurt putin and russia where it can hurt. yamiche: peter, i want to come to you because there is this news of european union officials

looking at potentially drafting a proposal to ban russian oil. how significant of a development is this? peter: if they follow through on it, it would be significant because russia sells a lot of energy to europe, and europe depends on russia. they have been very dependent. it is easy for politicians in washington to say, let's cut off russian oil here. we don't depend on it. we will not have our lights go off and our homes cold at night if we cut off russian energy the way europe does. if they have to follow through on it, it is a big deal, it is an economic pain for russia because that is where they get a lot of their income from overseas. but obviously it involves pain in the part of europeans and they are looking at ways to mitigate that through other sources of energy. that is something washington has tried to talk to them about. it would be a huge statement and potentially a big economic penalty for russia. yamiche: peter, in the last

couple seconds, i want to ask you quickly about this reporting on ukraine as a sort of i.t. war. they have a defense minister working with social media influencers to tell the story of the war, to be on social media keeping it front of mind. one port even described ukraine as a tech company and russia as an old rusty tank. what can you tell us about the different strategies here? peter: no question that ukraine has been a case study in the modern form of warfare. beyond of bombs and guns, there is an online war going on in which ukraine is fighting for the hearts and minds of the world. there minister has used twitter -- their minister has used twitter to shame companies to stop doing business with russia, to appeal to countries around the world for help. they have sent thousands of businesses contact to seek help or to cut off russia.

they have used that sort of platform to bring their case around. obviously, the videos they can post. the president's ability to talk to the world through zoom, through video, it is so different the last time we saw more in the book -- last time we saw war in the balkans. ukraine made their case against russia. it is surprising that russia has not seemingly been able to use it to their benefit. that might be a sign of preparation done in advance of the war by ukrainians. or maybe they are holding back and there is cyber power from russia we have not seen yet. yamiche: it is an interesting thing we will want to keep talking about. meanwhile, this week, the nation's economic challenges deepened. inflation hit a new forty-year high. president biden traveled to iowa and north carolina to talk about what his administratiois doing to address rising prices.

pres. biden: our economy has gone from being on the mend to being on the move. i know that we are still facing challenges of high prices, inflation. we need to address these high prices, and urgently, for working folks out there. yamiche: in the meantime, many republicans are focusing their midterm election strategy on culture wars. issues like abortion, guns, and medical care for transgender young people. eugene, i want to come to you to talk about this strategy by president biden, but there was eye-popping reporting in politico playbook. i want to read it because president biden's campaign pollsters said this is possibly the worst politically environment i have lived through in 30 years of being a political consultant. that is striking to hear. i wonder what you are hearing from your sources about the challenges that democrats face and their strategy for navigating them. eugene: they are just as concerned.

when you talk to them, especially on background, they will be a lot more blunt because they see the same things we see. they see inflation. they talk to their family members around the country who have higher gas prices all of a sudden and people don't see a way out of this. they also talked about the importance of the administration and members of congress, democrats, in passing some form of the social spending bill. we have seen that stalled since last december, and fits and starts throughout. when they get back in just about a week, they will apparently start negotiating this more and in earnest. if they are able to do that, if they are able to pass some kind of bill, the hope that democrats have is that that will blunt some of this. if they don't keep the house and the senate, at least stem some of the bleeding so it is not as bad as it looks.

but when you talk to angelone feeling that way, it tells you how the admits ration is feeling and what president biden is hearing from folks. yamiche: i want to ask you about what president biden is hearing from felw democrats because the administration has announced it will restart selling leases to drill oil and gas on federal lands. what is your feeling on the tension between climate change? activistsant to see less reliance on fossil fuels, but you have a white house trying to make sure gas prices don't go any higher. eugene: the climate community is split, like democrats typically are on these kinds of issues. you have one camp that understands that what president biden is trained to do is address what they think is a short-term problem, getting gas prices to a better place, especially because you have the midterms so close. on the other hand, you have a lot of activists who say, wait, you promised us to work on

climate change and here we are talking about drilling more in the united states. there is a huge concern that the administration's promises on climate are not going to come to fruition because of where we are. who knows how long this wars going to continue as the administration figures out how to blunt some of that? the administration calls it the putin price hike. that inflation was going on before the invasion. that is something folks should remember. one of the things i have heard a lot from climate activists over the last week is they are frustrated with the white house because they felt like this was an opportunity to say to the american people consistently in every single speech, this is why we need to get away from fossil fuels in this country. look at the other ways we can bring energy to america by focusing on other aspects of this and not focusing on oil, and they have told the administration this. we will see how this plays out going forward. yamiche: marianna, there is also what is happening on the gop

side. we see republicans passing all sorts of laws focusing on culture wars. you talked to a republican from florida who says they are not shying away from these issues. what is the significance in the strategy here up the gop leaning in on these culture war issues? marianna: when i talk to republicans, it is pretty interesting to have them explain, ok, we are getting attacked by democrats, sure, with how we are framing these things. for example, the don't say gay legislation that governor ron desantis signed into lawast week. that isn't good for them, and they acknowledge that. they also acknowledge, you played that ad by kay ivey, the governor of alabama who says, we will start speaking spanish and that is not ok. they don't like to see that kind of extremism too much because they know that can elion eight certain bases -- that can alienate certain bases. in terms of don't say gay, that

could be women. in terms of what govnor ivey was saying, that is the hispanic vote. but when you explain these issues, that is where they see a lot of turnaround. in terms of the one congressman i spoke to from florida, a republican, they were saying that when they are back home talking about that legislation, not saying that it is don't say gay but the fact that we want to make sure that you as parents know that kids are being taught this at a very young age from pre-k to third grade, that gets a better reception from parents. and republicans, for the most part, have been looking at a number of culture issues and turning it back to the issue of choice. yamiche: it is a strategy that has been working for them. eugene, just a couple minutes left. i want to try to split it with you and peter, but i want to come to you for a minute and talk about the strategy. i was in alabama talking to

transgender children who say some of these laws are detrimental to their health. what do you make of this strategy? eugene: it is a strategy that republicans think is going to work for them if they are able to explain it in the right way and couch it in some parental rights, what are we teaching your children? but when you look at the kinds of things that are being taught in schools like with these don't say gay bills, talking about were not talking about gender identity in schools, kids are being taught that. it is not like kids are being taught about sexuality. that is something that when you talk to parents of transgender kids, when you talk to advocates, their concern is the effect of that, of kids pressing within themselves when we know the rates of suicide among that community are very high. there are concerns about how this plays out in the short and medium and long-term. yamiche: you told our producers

that democrats are in desperate straits, but we saw the president go to iowa and north carolina. what can you tell us about the politics here? peter: he has two real missions. one is to try to do what he can to getnflation under control, two, to be seen doing what he can to get inflation under control. there are limited tools that can impact that on a short-term basis, and that is a frustration for this administration. they don't have a lot of time left. the white house feels like it needs to have an image of a president who understands the concern is out there and trying to address them as aggressively as possible. yamiche: a lot to talk about. thank you so much, peter, eugene, marianna. we will continue our conversation on the "washington week extra." new text messages reveal how far some republicans wanted to go to overturn the 2020 election. find it on facebook, our website, and youtube.

tune in saturday to pbs news weekend for the latest news from ukraine. thank you f joining us. i am yamiche alcindor. good night from washington. >> corporate funding for "washington week" is provided by -- consumer cellular. additional funding is provided by -- koo and patricia yuen through the yuen foundation, committed to bridging cultural differences in our communities. sandra and carl delay magnuson. rose herschel and andy shreves. andy and susan rosenbaum. the corporation for public broadcasting's. and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you.

announcer: major funding for "tell me more with kelly corrigan" is provided by the john templeton foundation-- inspiring awe and wonder-- and by the gordon and llura gund foundation. ♪ studies tell us that listening is like driving: most people think they're way better at it than they are. this is funny and also a huge problem in marriage and parenting and in a country struggling to keep itself together. anna deavere smith is celebrated as an actor and a writer, but above all, she is a professional observer who turns curiosity into interviews into one-woman shows, in which she embodies the powerful and the dismissed, sharing their words verbatim

with audiences that might otherwise never hear