wow, you get to watch all your favorite stuff. it's to die for. now you won't miss a thing. this is the way. the xfinity 10g network. made for streaming. ♪ john: tonight on "pbs news weekend"... the changing landscape for college applicants after the supreme court's landmark ruling on race conscious admissions. then... where's my driver? how driverless cars are chauffeuring passengers around select american cities, raising safety questions along the way. and... after more than a century's long decline in america, why cricket is gaining popularity. venkatesh: i'm excited because the cricket here is getting a lot better. if we become like a great nation

in cricket, we might be rivaling up against india, pakistan. it's going to be fun. ♪ ♪ >> major funding for "pbs news weekend" has been provided by -- >> consumer cellular, this is sam, how may i help you? this is a pocket dial. u get nationwide coverage with no contract. that is kind of our thing. have a nice day. ♪ >> and with the ongoing support of these individuals and institutions -- and friends of the "newshour." ♪

this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. john: good evening. i'm john yang. on the day that fall officially begins, a tropical storm is producing a large area of rain as it moves up the atlantic coast, triggering flood watches and warnings along the way. ophelia came ashore this morning in north carolina and is forecast to reach southeastern virginia by this evening and be over water off the mid-atlantic coast by monday. with its winds already considerably diminished, the national hurricane center says the main threat is flooding from heavy rain -- more than a half foot of rain is forecast to fall in some areas. along the coast, storm surge warnings are up as far north as the chesapeake bay. tens of thousands of people have

already lost power from north carolina to pennsylvania. north carolina, virginia and maryland are all under states of emergency. the family of a 17-year-old black high school student in texas who's been suspended for his hairstyle is suing governor greg abbott and attorney general ken paxton. darryl george's family says abbott and paxton have failed to protect his constitutional right against discrimination and his right to freedom of expression. george has been serving an in-school suspension since late august when officials at barbers hill high school in the houston area said his dreadlocks violate the school district's dress code. a new texas state law bans racial discrimination based on hairstyles. car dealers may soon be feeling the bite of the auto workers strike, which begins its second week today, with the work stoppage expanding to dozens of gm and stellantis distribution hubs. the head of the national association of auto dealers said

parts shortages would soon put a crimp in dealers' highly profitable repair business. president biden will join a picket line in michigan on tusday, and former president trump is to visit striking workers there on wednesday. meanwhile, negotiators for hollywood writers and studios were back at the bargaining table for a fourth straight day, fueling hopes that an end to that nearly five-month strike may be close. -- may be at hand. but little progress is reported in the actors strike. and, homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas met with the honduran president xiomara castro in mcallen, texas, today to discuss cooperation on illegal migration. the meeting caps a week that saw a big surge of migrants along the border -- more than 8,000 people entered the country illegally at eagle pass, texas. illegal crossings dipped this spring but are on the rise again, on pace to match last year's record highs. still to come on "pbs news weekend". driverless rides -- the potential risks and rewards of robotaxis. and... cricket's booming popularity in

america. ♪ >> this is "pbs news weekend" from weta studios in washington, home of "the pbs newshour," weeknights on pbs. john: colleges and college-bound high school seniors are entering uncharted territory this fall. the first college application season in which schools are prohibited from considering race and ethnicity in making admissions decisions is the result of june's landmark supreme court ruling that race conscious admissions are unconstitutional. admissions officials at selective schools had been anticipating this, and they've been thinking about it for a while. but what about students and their families? sandy baum is a senior fellow at the urban institute's center on education data and policy. sandy, first of all, let's put this in perspective. how many students and schools does this really affect? sandy: that's a really important

question because you would think from the discussion that everyone is affected. that's not true. most schools accept virtually all of their applicants. and so it's only the schools that are highly selective where it really is going to make a difference at all. and the other issue is that it's really at the margin. so the biggest fear is that students will hesitate to apply if they think, oh, i'll never get in now that there is no affirmative action. and the most important thing is for students to apply and give institutions the opportunity to accept them because of their qualifications. john: high school juniors who were thinking about going to one of the applying to one of these selective schools who are trying to make themselves attractive applicants. should they be doing anything differently now? sandy: well, they should be thinking about the fact that they need to submit an application that will make it very clear who they are, what their strengths are. and of course, they do have the opportunity to talk about the way that race or other personal characteristics have affected

their experiences. they should maybe apply to more schools, more selective schools if they think their chances of any one have gone down. but they should still apply to the schools that they think will be the best fit for them. these schools are eager to maintain diverse student bodies. john: and as you say, this puts restrictions on what the schools can do, but it doesn't restrict in any way what the applicants can do. so they can still, in essays, identify their race or ethnic background. sandy: they can, but institutions will have to be very careful not to accept students because of their race. so they're going to want to get some advice from their guidance counselors and try to readbout how institutions are approaching this new dilemma. so, yeah, i mean, the biggest fear is that students will be afraid to apply. institutions are going to be working hard to prevent that from happening. and there will be some students who don't get in who might have

gotten in because of affirmative action, but they will get into another school instead. they certainly should not decide it's hopeless to go to college, to a four year college, to a selective institution. john: state schools in california, in michigan have been dealing with this for a while now because of state referendums that ban race conscious admissions. students who are applying now, can they take any lessons from students who are successful applicants to the colleges, state colleges in california and michigan? sandy: well, we know that when california, for example, banned affirmative action, the are of black and hispanic students on those campuses really did go down significantly at the beginning. but it has crept back up. and i mean, i think that the lesson is that institutions are working hard to get those students and that, you know, we just have to really hope that they will find ways. for example, they could consider socioeconomic background. so they can give preference to

people who have struggled against financially disadvantaged circumstances. so really, the lesson for students is just not to be scared off and to represent themselves accurately anto highlight their strengths. and let me say also that at the same time, the financial aid system is changing and it's going to get easier to apply for financial aid. and students want to be thinking about that at the same time that they're thinking about where and how to do the admission applications. the application is going to be shorter, it's going to be simpler, and it's going to be easier to import your tax information from the irs so that you don't have to answer all of the difficult questions. most students will be eligible for a little more financial aid than was the case before. that won't be true for all students, but it will be true for most students. so fill out the federal application for student aid and any other application that your institution requests. apply, apply, apply. john: while we're on the topic of financial aid, the average cost of attending a state school

-- tuition, room, board, books, the whole the whole schmear -- is about $27,000 this year, and it's $55,0 at private schools. the average graduate is coming out with student debt of about $30,000. is this worth it? is college worth it for every student? sandy: college is not worth it for every student, but it is worth it for most students. it's certainly very worth it on average. the average earnings for people who get bachelor's degrees compared to the average earnings for people who don't go to college, there's such a gap that in a year or two or three you're going to make up that difference. if you're not prepared to study in college, if you think there's a small chance that you'll actually graduate, maybe you should take some time to think about it. do your research. go to an institution where there's a reasonably high graduation rate and compare your financial aid offers. because most students get financial aid, they don't pay those high sticker prices. john: now, after this decision,

the supreme court decision, there are other factors in admissions that are being examined, legacy admissions of sort of favoring the children of alumni. now, they're also talking about early decisions. the critics say it favors wealthy and well-connected students. are we going to see more changes in this process? sandy: i think we'll see changes. we'll see the process evolve. one real problem is that in this process, people who come from advantaged backgrounds, people whose parents went to college, people who went to strong high schools, have all kinds of advantages. they are likely to have higher test scores. they are likely to have taken more rigorous high school curricula. they are likely to have more helpilling out their applications. they have more time for extracurricular activities. so we're never going to eliminate the advantages that students from more privileged backgrounds have, but i think there is going to be increasing effort to try to compensate as much as possible for the struggles that we know that many

students face. john: sandy baum of the urban institute center on education data and policy, thank you very much. sandy: thank you so much. ♪ >> taxi in some cities and the car that comes to pick you up will not have a driver. all by itself the robotaxi takes you to your destination. as ali rogin reports, these vehicles are generating a lot of interest and controversy. ali: with the cost of owning a car out of reach for many today, ridesharing gives commuters an alternative. in a handful of u.s. cities, self-driving taxis are getting the green light to pick up passengers. several companies, including waymo, cruise, and motional, are touting driverless taxis as the way of the future. but the rollout of these

robo-cabs has hit some speed bumps. not everyone is comfortable with autonomous cars on the road, and major technical questions remain. aarian marshall is a staff writer for wired, who covers transportation. aarian, thank you so much for joining us. driverless vehicles and autonomous functions on cars have been around for a while, but how new is this concept of self-driving taxis? aarian: yeah, this is a pretty new thing in terms of something that's actually happening on the streets right now. waymo, which is a company that's associated with google and alphabet, launched self-driving taxi services in phoenix, arizona, a few years ago, and now they're finally coming to san francisco. it's something that researchers, developers, the tech industry has been working on for a number of years now. and now it kind of seems like it's coming into fruition. ali: and how does a system like this work? we all know uber. does it work like uber and what is the user experience like? aarian: yeah, it's kind of exactly like uber. you download an app onto your phone if you happen to be in one of the cities where these taxi

systems are operating and you hail it by pressing a button and it shows up to your door. it's not in too many places right now. it's in the phoenix, arizona metro area. and then also in san francisco is where they're offering paid rides. so where you actually have to pay a fair to get into these driverless cars. so it's a real taxi company. but, these companies have ambitions to expand very quickly. cruise, which is a general motors subsidiary, has announced plans to come to 15 cities in ten states, everywhere from north carolina to texas to where i am in seattle. and waymo has plans to come to los angeles, austin. it's happening quickly. ali: now, where are the price points right now for these rides in the cities that you can do this in? and are they comparable to other ridesharing services that involve human beings? aarian: yeah. anyone who's taken an uber or

lyft recently might notice that prices have gone up a lot in recent years, so there's definitely space there for robotaxis to compete. and right now they're generally a bit lower than what you're seeing from those conventional human driven services. and the other kind of nice thing is that you don't have to tip the robots, so it might end up being a little lower overall. ali: in california in particular, there's been some blowback from, especially, emergency responders. what have been some of their concerns? aarian: yeah, emergency responders have been very concerned about the rollout of these robotaxis in california. in san francisco, the fire department there has said they've had at least 55 negative run-ins with robotaxis since the beginning of this year. that's everything from them kind of freezing in the middle of the road and not allowing fire trucks to get by to them freezing in front of fire stations, so the fire trucks can't leave those fire stations as they're responding to emergencies. so far, it doesn't seem like

this has really affected emergency victims, but it's something that officials in san francisco are really concerned about and watching very closely. ali: now in terms of the rid safety of these vehicles, what is that like? are these cars safe? aarian: yeah, so this is definitely up for debate. we do know that they've been built to be very cautious drivers. the companies that build them say this is the absolutely the right approach. i have heard from people in san francisco who say they're maybe a bit too cautious and they not only cause traic jams, but one of the most frequent crashes that these things get into in san francisco, and the other cities where they're testing right now, is they can get rear-ended by people, because they, for example, really do take full stops at stop signs. and they might sometimes stop short when they think they see something scary on the roads ahead of them. what the companies will tell you is that robots don't get drunk, they don't get tired, they don't get distracted. so it's possible that these could be safer than humans now, or perhaps down the line.

ali: based on your reporting, is it your sense that these companies want to figure out these issues that we've talked about before they begin scaling out to other cities, or do they view these as, as you just mentioned, not as bad as some of the hazards of driving in cars operated by humans. aarian: these companies will tell you that they are safety first, but that they can't guarantee that a car is going to be a totally, totally perfect 100% driver without running them on the streets first. so they are definitely kind of full steam ahead. now, they believe the technology is ready and close to ready to deploy, and more cities and in more places. ali: and lastly, aarian, so many people, especially during the pandemic, turn to the gig economy to make ends meet. what is the future for the jobs that are associated with ride sharing cars operated by humans? are these driverless taxis going to run people out of jobs? aarian: so, this is something we've heard a lot about from professional drivers isan

francisco as the state was considering last month whether to allow paid robotaxi services in the city of san francisco. we heard from uber drivers. we heard from a professional taxi drivers who said these things are coming from my job. -- for my job. and, the companies will tell you, yeah, that's going to happen, it is kind of true. but they say it's going to take a long time, so it's not like they're going to flip a switch and all of the professional driving jobs will disappear. ali: aarian marshall with "wired," thank you so much. aarian: thanks for having me. ♪ john: cricket was once one of this country's most popular sports until baseball became entrenched as america's game during the civil war. now the sport that was first played in england is seeing a resurgence here, thanks in part to thriving south asian immigrant communities who revere the game. amna nawaz takes us inside the

world of wickets, stumps, batters and bowlers. amna: it's gameday in germantown, maryland. players warming up... parents settling in on the sidelines... and the unmistakable sound of summer in america -- the crack of bat against ball. but it's not baseball that brought these crowds out today. it's cricket. >> one, two, three -- go mavericks! amna: on this sunday, two local youth cricket academies are squaring off. those are the mavericks in red, and the jaguars in blue. one of the first batters up for the jaguars is 12-year-old aakash venkatesh, whose journey to cricket was a long one. what was your first sport? aakash: soccer. amna: and then after that. aakash: tennis. badminton. amna: was there any sport you didn't try? aakash: football, because too much contact. with other sports i played, i had fun, but then it got boring

after a couple of weeks. with cricket, i just felt that spark. amna: a spark fanned into an all-consuming passion by his parents, including mom sunitha, who dutifully drives aakash and big brother adithya to dozens of matches every year across maryland and virginia. sunitha: we just love it. i see the games going on, i see parents cheering, supporting the kids. the love keeps going on. amna: cricket keeps this family close. it also fills every corner of their home, from trophies lining the shelves -- to a makeshift practice pitch in the basement. much of that enthusiasm cos from dad venky, who grew up loving the game in india. venkatesh: i started playing cricket right when i was probably eight or nine years old and had a dream built around

cricket. one day i wanted to be a cricket player. amna: when the couple moved to america, more american sports took cter stage. venkatesh: we introduced them to all the american sports initially -- to try tennis, soccer, basketball, swimming. but after a couple of weeks, the energy kind of died down. and cricket was the last sport that was introduced to them. amna: and this time, it stuck. aakash: we all played at some point or watched it and sometimes we like, put on the tv and then just watch it all together and it's just a fun thing to do together. amna: the family trains together, honing the boys' skills in a game that's now catching on across the country. and it's not as easy at it looks. cricket was invented in 17th century england, and spread across the globe with the british empire, arriving in australia, the west indies and

india by the 18th century. the game is played on a 360 degree field with batters on one team trying to score runs by hitting the ball past fielders and a pitcher -- known as a bowler -- on the opposing team -- all while protecting their wickets from the ball. it remains most popular in former british colonies like india, pakistan, south africa, australia. so why is this old, british game taking off in the united states? aishwarya: a confluence of things is happening. amna: aishwarya kumar of espn says immigration to the u.s. from cricket-obsessed nations is one reason. aishwarya: the south asian american population is exponentially increasing. it was 3.4 million back in 2010 and it's 5.4 million now. amna: another is live streaming cricket, keeping fans connected to the highest level of play -- like the indian premier league -- no matter where they live. aishwarya: there is just a global sort of movement around, okay, we can stay in india and australia and still watch cricket that's happening in the

u.s. amna: another reason? money. as the audience has grown here, so has the financial investment. aishwarya: a lot of resources are being poured into building stadiums and actually making sure that there is infrastructure in place and resources in place to develop something from scratch and get people excited here. amna: that something -- major league cricket, or mlc -- launched this summer, an american competition hoping to win viewers around the world. vijay: the casual american sports fan who's never seen a game should co and take a look at one and i think they'll be hooked. amna: vijay srinivasan is co-founder of the league. vijay: it's not the traditional image of cricket that many people in america have, which lasts several days, and there's people dressed in white clothes, and sit down for a cup of tea and break for lunch, and so on. amna: the league, featuring six teams from across the country, was a passion project for

srinivasan. he founded a live-streaming cricket channel in the early 2000s, which showed him there was a viewer base in the u.s. hungry for elite competition. this season sold out most games, and srinivasan says there are plans to build more stadiums and infrastructure. >> that's going to change the landscape for cricket in this country and hopefully with the cricket world cup coming to the u.s. next year it's going to be a very different picture of a few years from now. amna: a picture that may feature future pros like aakash and adithya, who is now trying out for the under 19 team usa. so i'm going to ask you both the question and i want you to both answer at the same time. on the count of three. ready? who's the better player? 1, 2, 3, go. [laughter] >> i'm excited because the cricket here is getting a lot better. at the end of the day, if we become like a great nation in cricket, we might be rivaling up

against india, pakistan. it's going to be fun. amna: what's it like for you as a parent to watch your children succeed in this sport that clearly means so much to you? venkatesh: it's kind of a dream come true. nothing else apart from that. and i can say i'm living my dream through them. amna: a dream carried across an ocean, and a generation, that found new life here in the u.s. for pbs news weekend, i'm amna nawaz in maryland. ♪ john: and online tomorrow morning, watch live as a capsule carrying the first asteroid samples collected in space returns to earth. all that and more on our website, pbs.org/newshour. that is pbs news weekend for this saturday. i'm john yang. for all of my colleagues, thanks for joining us on this first day

of fal see you tomorrow. >> major funding for "pbs news weekend" has been provided by -- >> consumer cellular, this is sam, how may i help you? this is a pocket dial, but i will let you know you get nationwide coverage with no contract. that's kind of our thing. have a nice day. ♪ >> and with the ongoing support of these individuals and institutions -- ♪ this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy.] ♪ ♪

>>

♪ ♪ robina: any boy who attacks this fine young man must be on hitler's side in this war. is there anyone of you who's on hitler's side? ♪ ♪ albert: i know what i am, webster. do you kw what you are? nancy: i've been to the clinic. i'll just continue making a nuisance of myself. that wouldn't be advisable. we are the brave ones here. nancy: there is no treatment. there is only murder. get out. get out! you have brought them to our door. you have l them to our door! (missiles firing) (men shouting, tom exhales) douglas: i want him back!