geoff: good evening. i'm geoff bennett. amna: and i am another vase. -- how the back-and-forth is making it difficult for businesses to plan ahead. amna: president trump's push to fire federal workers and slashed

spending hits new roadblocks in the courts. amna: and the justice department drops a biden erin check -- biden era challenge to abortion in idaho. >> physicians are unwilling to risk there were liberty and livelihoods on guessing whether their conduct will fit within an exception. >> major funding for the pbs news hour has been provided by. >> two retiring executives change their focus to greyhounds giving these former race dogs a former -- these former race dogs a chance to win. life well planned. >> someone coming out of college, it can be very nerve-racking not knowing what to expect, whether you will like

your job or not, whether you will fit in and here, i feel like it is so welcoming and such an inclusive place to work. you feel like you are valued. >> and friends of the newshour including robert kaplan and kathy and paul anderson. carnegie corporation of new york, working to reduce political polarization through philanthropic support for education, democracy and peace. more information at carnegie.org. and with the ongoing support of these individuals and institutions.

this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you, thank you. geoff: welcome to the newshour. president trump announced this afternoon that elon musk will need to consult with cabinet secretary's before firing more federal workers. amna: that came after trump met with musk and his cabinet earlier in the day. we have the latest -- lisa desjardins joins us now with the latest on government layoffs and the court challenges surrounding them. what did trump announce and what does it mean for any change in power that musk has? lisa: trump announced today that musk must work with cabinet secretary's to deal with firings other agencies and specifically said they are going to we -- meet every other week. the secretaries will use a scalpel versus a hatchet, but it has been the hatchet approach, at the same time as trump seems to be empowering secretaries, he

also said if secretaries does not make cuts, elon musk will. i don't think there is a change in power. what is happening is the administration is reconfiguring after courts have been very clear that elon musk and the agencies he is associated with do not have the power to make these firings. they are doing a kind of workaround. he will meet with cabinet agencies and they will do the firing but he is still right there. amna: there has been some major action affecting federal workers starting with thousands who could get their jobs back. lisa: quite a lot of news. let first one has to do with the u.s. department of agriculture, where we know now about 6000 probationary workers were fired. in a ruling, this decision is from a critical agency called the merit systems protection board. in this ruling, the chair of the organization wrote that probationary workers fired, those in their jobs a year or less who were sent a dismissal

letter, the chair wrote that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the agency usda terminated the after mentioned probationary employees in violation of u.s. law. the ruling when you get into it finds a number of reasons this was in violation but overall the idea is that mass firings are not allowed under statute the way they've been done in a generic form. i want to talk about where we are overall with firings. if you look at the usda change from that granting, it is in addition to gsa, the general services administration. at the department of education, thousands are waiting to see if they will be fired. then you put in those 6000 that have been ordered to have their jobs reinstated as i've just reported. altogether, we still have about 31,000 people at least two have been fired. one other important development, this one in trump's favor.

a court ruled that the special counsel, he cannot be reinstated for his job all stuff they took him out of that watchdog post and today he announced he's not going to appeal the case because it would just take too long. that is a critical watchdog function and he is out of that job. amna: a lot of court action to keep track of but there is also news about contractors and organizations dealing with the federal funding freezes. lisa: first i want to talk about the freezing of grants and loans. there was a temporary ruling put in place, a judge has said that needs to stay enforced much longer. here is what the judge wrote when he blasted trump's funding freeze. he wrote this fundamentally undermines the distinct constitutional roles that each branch of government. here the executive put itself above congress. the judge saying he is not exempt -- not against executive power but this is an overreach. i want to talk about where we are with usaid and cases

involving foreign aid. there were contractors hired by usaid who lost their job, a judge has denied their reinstatement. those contractors who had those jobs. on the other end, foreign aid organizations, the supreme court has ordered that they should be repaid for services. they have rendered. those organizations are still waiting for that money. we are waiting for an order on when that will happen. at least one large partner organization announced it is closing today. amna: thank you so much. in the day's other news, the trump administration today once

again put europe on notice, as european leaders met to try and coalesce around a new defense plan. president trump said he would selectively abide by article 5, which commits the u.s. to defend nato countries. and a senior official blamed ukraine itself for the u.s. pause on military and intelligence support, ahead of a planned u.s.-ukraine meeting next week. here's nick schifrin. >> i view nato as potentially good, but you gotta get some good thinking. nick: today in the white house, trump questioned one of the u.s.'s most consequential commitments, to defend any nato country that is attacked. >> if they don't pay i'm not going to defend them. nick: president trump has long complained that european countries don't spend enough on defense. today, 23 of 30 to spend at least 2% of gdp on defense. president doubts their commitment to common defense

known as article five. europeans are trying to erase those doubts and tonight endorsed a rearm plan expanding the eu defense spending by $800 billion. and getting governments money to invest in ukrainian weapons or purchase american weapons to send to ukraine. the polish president speaking at nato. >> if the whole of nato does not increase their defense spending, then unfortunately possibly, vladimir putin would be eager to attack again because there would not be enough of a deterrent. nick: on the red carpet in brussels today, europe and ukraine standing shoulder to shoulder. >> you made a strong signal to ukraine and warriors, civilians, all of our families and it is great that we are not alone. we feel it and we know it. nick: ukraine also feels nightly russian attacks and once again today, russian -- russians

struck a civilian target, a hotel in southern ukraine where american volunteers were staying including adam. >> i'm sure there is a reason that we all survived, and it is so that we can continue to help ukraine for as long as it takes. ukraine is a wonderful country and is an example to the world for democracy and freedom. >> they brought it on themselves. nick: special envoy to ukraine and russia, keith kellogg blamed zelenskyy for the u.s. decision to pause intelligence and military aid. >> you don't negotiate peace discussions in public. you don't try to challenge the president of the united states in the oval office, that you need to side with me and not the russians. it's like hitting a mule across the nose. you got their attention. this is one of those listen to me, we are serious about this and you need to understand we are serious about this and this is one of the ways we make sure they understood.

nick: he suggested the meeting between steven witkoff and russian president vladimir putin produced an understanding. >> we are aware, of what you want to do and the discussions that were made. >> it is there term sheet, essentially? >> i used the term terms sheet. the answer is a generalization. nick: ukrainian soldiers and their commanders have described u.s. policy shifts as a betrayal, as voiced today as the -- by the former army chief and current ambassador to london. >> it is not only russia and the axis trying to destroy the world order but the united states of america is actually destroying it completely. nick: senior trump officials say that is not the president's intention but they say he does intend to unsettle and disrupt and ukraine feels that its survival is at stake. amna: meanwhile on capitol hill,

the house voted to censure democrat al green today, for disrupting president trump's address to congress earlier this week. 10 democrats joined republican members in passing the resolution. >> [gavel] johnson: the house will come to order clear the well please, clear the well the house has to continue its business. [singing] amna: a chaotic scene followed the vote as some 20 fellow democrats joined green in singing "we shall overcome" and refused to leave the well of the chamber. speaker mike johnson eventually declared the house in recess. later on the house floor, green defended his protests and addressed the president directly. >> you are a goliath. but mr. president, there are davids among us. your incivility can no longer be tolerated. it has to be met with righteous indignation and righteous incivility. amna: on tuesday night, the representative from texas took

issue when trump claimed to have a historic mandate from voters. green refused to sit down and shouted at trump before speaker mike johnson ordered him removed from the chamber. presidential addresses to congress have grown more contentious in recent years. in 2009, republican representative joe wilson was formally reprimanded by the house for shouting at then-president obama. republican lawmakers also interrupted joe biden during his speech last year. a judge in baltimore agreed to reduce the sentence for adnan syed to 'time served' today. that means the 43-year-old will remain free, even though his murder conviction still stands. syed's case gained worldwide attention through the 'serial' podcast. he was sentenced in 2000 to life in prison for the murder of his former high school girlfriend. syed always maintained his innocence, and was released from prison in 2022 after prosecutors found problems with the case. since his release, syed has been

working at georgetown university's prisons and justice initiative. in south korea, a pair of fighter jets accidentally dropped eight bombs on a civilian area, during a joint military exercise with u.s. forces. the incident took place in the city of pocheon near the country's heavily-armed border with north korea. camera footage caught the moment of impact. at least eight people were injured, four of them seriously. south korea's air force has apologized, and offered compensation to the victims. an investigation is ongoing, and all live-fire training has been suspended until further notice. pope francis was heard in public today, for the first time since being hospitalized with double pneumonia nearly three weeks ago. in an audio message broadcast to the faithful in saint peter's square, the 88-year-old pontiff spoke directly to those who have supported him.

[speaking italian] amna: i thank you from the bottom of my heart for your prayers for my health, francis said in his native spanish. his voice was notably weak and breathless. a cardinal stood to the side, presiding over the evening prayers. doctors say pope francis has been stable for three full days, though his prognosis remains guarded. in space news, u.s. company intuitive machines said this afternoon that its 'athena' lunar lander did touch down on the south side of moon today, but they could not confirm whether it is upright or indeed, even where it is. earlier, all had appeared well for the six-legged robotic spacecraft as it began its descent. but, some 20 minutes after touchdown. >> we are working to evaluate exactly what our orientation is on the surface. amna: the company could not confirm its status. after a few tense moments, the

live webcast abruptly ended. it wasn't until hours later, that the ceo of intuitive machines confirmed that the lender is not "in the correct attitude on the moon, but that it is returning data." the mission comes almost exactly one year after an attempt by the same company resulted in a spacecraft landing on the moon, but tipping on its side. amid the confusion today, shares of intuitive machines fell about 20%. and jazz musician and composer roy ayers has died. he was a master of the vibraphone, as well as an accomplished keyboardist and vocalist who brought a whole new sound to jazz. his 1976 hit 'everybody loves the sunshine' has been sampled by artists like tupac, dr. dre, and mary j. blige. known as the 'godfather of neo-soul,' ayers had 12 albums

land in the billboard charts over his six-decade career. his family said he passed away from a long illness. roy ayers was 84 years old. still to come on the "newshour," former social security head martin o'malley on how potential cuts could put older americans at risk. and what to know about president trump's crypto currency plans. >> this is the pbs news hour from the david m rubenstein studio and weta in washington and the walter cronkite school of journalism at arizona state university. amna: this week, the trump administration moved to dismiss a lawsuit against the state of idaho that sought to allow abortions in the case of medical emergencies. idaho is one of twelve states across the country with a near-total abortion ban. the biden administration originally sued idaho arguing

that federal law requires doctors to perform an abortion if a patient's life is at risk. joining me now to discuss the impact is mary ziegler, a professor at u.c. davis school of law, and legal historian on reproductive rights. welcome back to the news hour. prof. ziegler: thank you for having me. amna: we should note the supreme court did weigh in on this case last year. it's that ruling that allowed emergency abortions to continue in idaho, but they kicked the key legal question back to this appeals court. so mary, what does the trump administration's move to dismiss the case mean for its future? prof. ziegler: well, at the moment, the case seems to be dead on arrival. there's an interesting question about whether some other party will try to intervene to keep the case alive. in other words, whether there'll be some other party with standing that can step in where the trump administration has backed away, but we don't know yet if that's gonna happen. amna: so emergency room doctors had been performing what they

deemed to be life saving abortions while this was in litigation. without the case, where does that leave doctors on the ground and patients in need of this care? prof. ziegler: it leaves them in a tremendous amount of uncertainty. idaho has maintained throughout this litigation that its abortion ban permits what it views as medically necessary abortions. physicians have been unclear as to whether that's true, and i think also unwilling to risk the kind of penalties that idaho law authorizes for making the wrong guess. and we've seen since the supreme court overturned roe v. wade in 2022 that physicians have been pretty risk averse, so we would expect to see more of the same in idaho and that will of course have impacts on patients, seeking abortion and also patients with wanted pregnancies. amna: there was, it's my understanding, a sort of test period in idaho in which the ban was in place before the biden era litigation sort of paused the implementation there. did we see anything in the way of impact during that period that tells us what could be ahead for the impact on the ground?

prof. ziegler: yeah, we did, so there were several instances in which patients had to be airlifted to other hospitals because physicians in idaho were unwilling to treat them or unsure if they could intervene. again, i think idaho maintained that that was an overreaction by physicians, but we're going to see more of the same almost inevitably, because physicians are unwilling to risk their liberty and livelihoods on guessing whether they're conduct will fit within an exception, and we'd expect to see more of the same, as this law goes back into effect. amna: so more broadly in terms of the implication here, i mean, what does this signal to you about how this trump administration views and plans to interpret federal laws that are designed to protect emergency or urgent care when they bump up against state laws like state abortion bans that conflict with that? prof. ziegler: yeah, i mean one of the things i think that's telling is that the trump administration hasn't been particularly vocal about its positions on abortion.

it hasn't been something that president trump has been foregrounding, but i think slowly and without a lot of fanfare, we're starting to see the trump administration bringing policy into alignment with the preferences of the anti-abortion movement. and of course, there are other things we're waiting to see on that front too, most notably access to mifepristone, which is a drug used in more than half of all abortions in the united states. this week, the trump administration asked a judge, matthew kasmyryck, for more time to review the administration's position on mifepristone and critically important litigation going forward. so i think this is a sign that there's going to be more to come from the trump administration in moving policy in a pretty radically or considerably conservative direction when it comes to abortion. amna: related to mifepristone access there was mr. trump's pick to lead the fda, dr. marty mckay, who was in his confirmation hearing on capitol hill today was asked about access to that abortion pill and would only say that he has no preconceived plans on mifepristone policy. so do you foresee access to

mifepristone going away under new fda leadership? prof. ziegler: it seems pretty likely that access to mifepristone will change. i don't know if the fda and the trump administration will move to entirely eliminate mifepristone access, for example, by using the comstock act or just removing mifepristone from the market or if instead the trump administration will roll back restrictions that had been in place and eliminate telehealth access to it, but it seems like that's the bare minimum we're likely to see. i think it's more likely to be a question of when rather than if. amna: mary ziegler from uc davis school of law. always good to speak with you. thank you so much for making the time. appreciate it. prof. ziegler: thank you for having me. geoff: president trump continues -- president trump has temporarily suspended tariffs coming -- on new goods coming in

from mexico and canada. the delay gives countries a one-month reprieve on products traded under the new mexico and canada agreement, that replaced nafta under the last trump administration. yesterday the president granted a similar pause for automakers but the beginnings of what seems to be a trade war and the sudden swings in policy are rattling investors and markets. the three major stock indices in the u.s. fell again today. to help sort through all of this we are joined by the chief economist at moody's. welcome back to the news hour. the nation's trade policy changed hour-by-hour today. what is your reaction to this delay and why do you think president trump issued it? mark: well the on-again off-again tariffs are a problem for businesses, trying to get their minds around which products, which companies, all

of the uncertainty is creating all kinds of havoc for businesses and their hiring and investment decisions. another month delay, ok, just one more thing to worry about and consider and try to take in and what happens a month from now? not until we get clarity around the tariffs, exactly how high they are going to be and which countries -- i don't think businesses are going to sit on their hands. they might not cut back, they might not fire people. but they will certainly be much more cautious and that puts the economy at risk and that is what the stock market is saying. that this is really bad for business. geoff: retail sales are down, as our manufacturing sales, and factoring production, consumer confidence. what are the risks of this uncertainty to the american public?

mark: clearly, it slows the economy down. to put this into context, the economy came into the year performing very well. lots of growth and jobs in 2024, unemployment at 4%, very low. it looked like it could weather a lot of storms but the tariffs are stacking up to be a pretty significant storm. if it continues to rage, if we don't see some clarity soon, within weeks, i think businesses are going to start pulling back, we are going to start to see job loss. we potentially could suffer a recession. in president trump's first term, we went down this path to a significant degree and the president was very responsive to what he saw in the stock markets. he was listening to business people and he ultimately struck a deal with the chinese who he

imposed the tariffs on and things cooled off, life went on and we made our way through. hopefully that is the same thing that happens here relatively soon, that he does decide to figure out how to strike a deal and cool things off and get back to business because if he doesn't, then we are going to be facing a recession and that means job loss and lost income and lost wealth and nobody wants that. geoff: president trump appears to be using these tariffs as a leverage point, a negotiating tactic. from where you sit, has it been effective? mark: not so far. he has imposed tariffs on china, on canada and mexico. the canadians and mexicans responded to the first round of tariffs by saying they are putting more troops on the border to address the fentanyl and immigration issues. so far, that is really small

potatoes. i don't think it is a significant policy response, so no. we haven't -- the president has not gotten much out of the trade war that has ensued. mark: mexico's prince -- geoff: mexico's president seems to be having more success in her talks with trump than the prime minister of canada. have you seen any major differences in their strategies that would account for that? mark: maybe where they are in their tenure as leaders of their country. prime minister trudeau is at the end of his tenure. he may feel he has more latitude to respond. he is not fettered politically. the president in mexico, she is very new to her post, so she might feel more circumspect. the other thing is raw economics. if you look at canadian imports into the united states, it accounts for 17% of their gdp

which is a lot but it's a lot lower than mexicans dependence on u.s. exports. that's closer to 25% of gdp. that may also be playing a role. this is important and i think leaders around the world who are waiting for their own tariffs are looking at this and seeing what the canadians are doing and what mexicans are doing and trying to learn some lessons from that. geoff: chief economist at moody's, thank you for being with us. mark: sure thing. geoff: president trump continues to say his administration won't touch social security, the social safety net that around 70 million retired and disabled americans depend on each month. but as elon musk and the so-called department of government efficiency look to slash federal jobs and spending,

the social security administration has plans to cut 12% of its workforce. laura barron lopez reports on how that could affect the program and its payments. laura: the acting agency head told employees this week that it's musk and doge that are calling the shots at ssa. the washington post reported that leland dudek told senior staff at ssa that musk's team of quote "outsiders who are unfamiliar with nuances of ssa programs" are making decisions and that they "will make mistakes." and this morning, the agency told its workers they can no longer use their government computers to look at, among other things, news websites - even blocking access to some of them. the restriction was said to help protect sensitive information. but news sites and obituaries are often relied on to confirm death information and prevent fraud. for a closer look at the effect of potential cuts to social security, i'm joined by martin o'malley who was the commissioner of ssa during the biden administration and previously served as governor of maryland.

thank you so much for joining the news hour. the social security administration is looking to cut 12% of its workforce, some 7000 people. how will people receiving benefits potentially feel the effect of those cuts? how will this impact the agency? martin: ever since december, people have been putting -- those eligible to retire, starting to leave the agency, the agency already had been driven down to a 50 year low in staffing, even as baby boomers and my generation swelled their customer ranks to a new record high every single day. people are going to experience much longer wait times on the phone. we had gotten that speed to answer down to 12 and a half minutes. it has a shot back up to over a half-hour now. you are going to see more people dying waiting in line for their initial disability determinations, which we had started to get moving in a better direction. that is now going back up, and

it's going to take longer when people do decide to retire to actually effectuate that claim and get them into a payment status. all of this cratering out of the agency, all of this gutting of the customer service staffing is going to have very widespread consequences for all 72 million people receiving social security, because they've never had to operate these old systems with such few staff and they are being gutted every single day. i think they are going to drive more than 7000 people out of the agency. laura: there could be more changes coming. elon musk has called social security quote, a ponzi scheme. president trump claims millions of people from 100 years old to three hundred years old are getting social security money. speaker johnson has told people to not believe the social security administration inspector general report that said that only 1% of social security payments are improper.

what is your response? martin: it seems that there is a concerted effort to undermine public trust in social security, an institution, which by the way has the highest trust rating, second only to the interior department and smokey the bear. all of these things. we've heard these arguments before. there are not tens of millions of dead people stealing our benefits. that has been debunked by everyone, including the acting commissioner who is saluting and taking orders from doge. i think what they are trying to do is undermine public trust, public confidence in social security. i believe they are intentionally trying to break it so that they can loot it. i don't really understand what that reason is, but they seem to be hell-bent on gutting the

agency and driving it into a ditch. laura: in an email to employees earlier this week, the acting administrator said that ssa needs to quote, outsource non-essential function to industry experts. some in the agency took that to mean that maybe they are going to privatize elements of the ssa. that could potentially be one of the goals. what impact would that have if they moved to privatize sections of the agency? martin: the notion that somehow you can fire all of the public employees and automatically five at sector will step up, how are they going to do that? allstate operates at 11% overhead as an insurance company. liberty mutual operates at 23% overhead. when this agency operated well, they were allowed to operate at 1.2%. i think people running agencies should learn and understand them before they go about dismantling them and crashing them. for 90 years they haven't missed

a monthly payment but now they are putting it at great risk of doing that by being hollowed out and gutted. private sector solution, sure, bring them on but there is no way to serve ever-growing customer bases with ever reduced staffing. laura: you recently said quote, people should start saving now. why are you issuing that warning? ? martin: i learned a lot about the systems. the agency's all people helping people, and the systems those people need to process claims, effectuate payments and make sure the 72 million americans get their direct deposit every month, or those that opt for a paper check got those. all of their systems are very old. they are driving the people out of the agency who actually understand how to maintain that system. not just to code in cobalt but to understand the architecture of how that foundation supports

the other foundations on top of it. i believe you are going to see increasing outages of longer durations of the claims process systems that will ultimately cascade into a total system collapse that will interrupt benefits. whether that will be just one month and they get it back up or two months, i don't know but i do believe some people depend entirely on social security, but they should start saving for what i believe is the inevitable cratering of this agency and the interruption for some time of the benefits. laura: martin o'malley, former head of the social security administration, thank you for your time. amna: president trump is holding the first crypto summit at the white house tomorrow, featuring investors, ceos and founders of crypto companies. many in that world also hope trump spells out a clearer path

involving little regulation in the future. and trump says he will announce the details of a new crypto reserve for the federal government. geoff: estimates vary widely but surveys have found anywhere from 7% to 28% of u.s. adults invest in crypto. the market's total value is estimated around $3 trillion at the moment. there are also real concerns about the stability of crypto and similar digital assets and whether president trump has potential conflicts of interest. our paul solman breaks it down for us. paul: let's start with some basics. a cryptocurrency like bitcoin is a bit of computer code, really just a unique string of dozens of characters that identifies your ownership of some strictly digital asset, existing only in what my mother disparagingly called cyberspace. >> so that's really different than most of the other assets that we think about in the world. bitcoin itself is classified as a commodity like things like gold. but those commodities have a real world analog component. you can you know, there's gold

sitting in a vault somewhere. there's a bar or there's a coin. bitcoin's purely digital. paul: when i first covered cryptocurrency in 2013, one bitcoin was worth about $125. five years later, more than $7,000. now a whole bitcoin is selling near $90,000. so, what's its appeal? >> if i want to send money to somebody, it has to pass through multiple institutions to get to them. with crypto i don't need to wait. the money is liquid. you can have it instantly. it's almost free to send it. that is innovation. it is just better. paul: and bitcoin is supposed to be even scarcer than gold, as there's an absolute limit to the supply, unlike government currencies like the dollar which can suffer inflation and in cases like germany in 1923 and zimbabwe and venezuela more recently, hyper inflation. plus, all transactions are

publicly displayed on something called a blockchain tracked on every computer that uses the software. >> another huge component of whether or not something is a good store of value is whether people believe in it, whether they've decided it's a good store of value. so it's kind of got these dual sides. you need to have certain properties that we can talk about pretty rationally. but then there's this this narrative component. paul: one part of the narrative: bitcoin will gradually replace currencies like the dollar as a form of payment. but given the volatility of its value. >> if you're talking to anyone who's saying that bitcoin is going to be used for payments, that's kind of a fringe idea. most bitcoiners now just stick to the idea that the price will go up forever, right? and that we will all get rich. paul: okay, that's a digital asset like bitcoin, ether, solana and now thousands of others. but what about meme coins?

in general, and the trump coin in particular. >> meme coins are crypto assets that are themed around a specific idea or sometimes a person. generally, there is no business behind a meme coin project. there's no sort of greater purpose, but they are used as vehicles for speculation. paul: meme coins have become very popular of late. one of the most well-known is dogecoin. long-hyped by elon musk, it's based on a shiba inu meme and has had enduring value. but most of them don't. >> the asset is worth whatever you can sell it for, and you better try to do it quick before it goes to zero. >> there are over 5 million meme coins. 99% of them go to zero. paul: it's a game. the goal: get in early and hope that to use the old wall street expression, a greater fool will come along and pay a higher price. >> we call it vaporware. there's no promise or utility with a meme coin other than the connection to the idea. paul: in january president trump

announced his own meme coin. >> the trump token was one of the biggest meme coins that we've ever seen launched. president trump, just before his inauguration, launched a meme coin themed around himself . shortly after, his wife launched a meme coin called melania token, which came a couple of days later. paul: what happened when the trump meme coin came out on the market? >> insanity. it was one of the craziest nights i've ever experienced in crypto. ever. like it was nuts because no one believed that it was real. everyone thought it was a scam. everyone thought that his account was hacked. paul: but the trump coin was real. 1 billion to be released over three years. 200 million were released to the market. the coin's creators own the remaining 800 million. >> i was like ok i'm going to put a little bit of money into this, because if i'm wrong, that's going to suck. and this is the amount of money that i'm i'm okay with just completely losing. paul: in fact, laranja says he made money on his trump coin bet.

but if you invested late, you sure didn't. >> a small number of people got in early and profited from this trump coin. the majority of people who bought the coin ended up losing money. and they can see this because you can track transactions on the blockchain. paul: hundreds of thousands of crypto accounts lost money on the bet, amounting to billions in cumulative losses. meanwhile, the trump-affiliated creators of the coin made some $100 million in fees alone, plus presumably profits from the coin itself. >> about 80% of the token supply was allocated to trump and trump entities. and so based on the token price, he potentially makes quite a lot of money off of that token. paul: but to some in the crypto community, trump coin's downside is more that it's a gateway to scamming. >> because he basically opened the floodgates for people to scammed without being scared of it. people in the space call it crime season. that's what started.

crime season started. paul: president trump's views on crypto have evolved. in 2021 he called bitcoin a scam. but with the biden administration tough on crypto in general, supporters began to back trump and his re-election bid. >> david bailey, who runs bitcoin magazine, which is the organizer of the annual bitcoin conference that draws thousands of bitcoiners from around the world. he got together a group of a few dozen of the top bitcoin investors and got them to agree to donate the maximum amount to trump, which, if you count all the committees and everything, is $844,600 each. paul: trump's pledge? >> the united states will be the crypto capital of the planet and the bitcoin superpower of the world. paul: in part by overhauling regulations. >> and so far, he's taken a number of steps in that direction. so sec has been dropping investigations and lawsuits against a number of crypto

companies. one of the sec lawyers who was the lead on some of these crypto enforcement actions has been punished by being transferred to the it department. there's a huge conflict of interest here. trump has his own crypto businesses. his administration is now deciding an entirely new set of rules that are going to govern this industry. paul: trump is also planning a u.s. crypto strategic reserve to include bitcoin and other tokens, which could boost the value of the president's own crypto ventures, of which there are several. >> it started with him launching several nft projects that were themed around him. he also is a major recipient and sort of beneficiary of a company called world liberty financial, which is a crypto based project that plans to launch some sort of a crypto application in the near future. he received something like 75% of the proceeds from that project. his truth social platform, which he owns, has been talking about

launching a crypto segment where they would allow for crypto trading. they've spoken about holding crypto assets themselves. he has very deep involvement in the crypto world these days. paul: and that raises another issue. >> members of the government are not supposed to receive money from people who are trying to influence policy. and this these new crypto projects provide a very direct way for such people to do so, often in ways that can be a little bit more challenging to trace than, say, a bank transfer. paul: if, that is, anyone is planning to try to trace them at all. for the pbs newshour, paul solman. amna: we will be back shortly with a look at the intersection of technology and hollywood. amna: but first, take a moment to hear from your local pbs station. it's a chance to offer your support which helps to keep

programs like this one on the air. amna: for those of you staying with us, an encore from one of rock and roll's greatest songwriters. geoff: last year, nick lowe released his first full-length album in nearly a dozen years. here's a second look from special correspondent tom casciato for our arts and culture series, canvas. tom: it is hard to find rock ''' roll credentials more solid than nick lowe's. it's not just because he tours with a surf rock band, the straitjackets in their trademark mexican wrestling masks. from pub rock to new wave, he built his rep in the seven -- in the 1970's.

he was also a producer for graham parker, the dammed and elvis costello. he even penned one of rock's most memorable anthems. but if rock 'n' roll is all you know about nick lowe and his 75 years on the planet and well over 50 in the music business, let's start at the start. >> my father was a career raf officer. he met my mom during the war. she was in the women's royal air force. she came from the show business family, vaudeville. taught me how to sing inchworm. that's got this lovely -- when kids sing one tune and a counter melody. i figured out how to be able to sing another tune while someone

is singing a different tune, and a third element is created. tom: he recalls more scenes -- seeds his mother planted. the jazzy pop of nat king cole. >> sinatra, peggy lee. tom: but then came the beatles and scenes like this led young nick straight to rock 'n' roll. >> get famous on the tv, meet more girls. it didn't take me too long to realize that if i wanted to have any kind of long career, i had to learn how to write songs. tom: a composer he became, writing songs he still performs today. but as he gained confidence, he also learned humility as when he produced costello's classic

debut album. >> i started the -- i said what you should do here is this, that and don't sing their. after about two days i was turned out of the studio. tom: in 1979, nick lowe established hit maker status on his own. a british documentary shows him looking very much a rockstar. but he says that involved a certain amount of role-play. >> i realized really soon that i wasn't the sort of person who could sustain that. tom: you didn't think rock superstardom. >> i'm not elton john or cher. i have always thought the most fun you can have is just before you make it. tom: in the 1980's just after he

made it, it sure looked like nick was having fun, maybe the time of his life. you watch the video and you look like you are on top of the world. >> yes, i suppose it did. i thought that was me in decline. i could feel my pop star status waning. i was drinking and taking too many drugs, in a bid to try and cheer myself up and write better songs and it doesn't work. but also my pop star shtick was boring as well. tom: it sounds like it was hard for a time for nick lowe to be nick lowe. but in the ensuing decades, he abandoned the rockstar stance and took on the role he has to this day, that of what rolling stone has called a master songwriter who never takes himself too seriously. >> ur britain's songwriter.

-- you are britain's songwriter. >> i think paul mccartney might have something to say about that. tom: he gained that status partly by learning -- by reaching back to the music you learned from his mom -- he learned from his mum. >> a lot of the music he recorded from the 1990's on has as much a relationship to the pre-beatles era to the rock 'n' roll era. >> that is nice of you to observe that. tom: nick and the band have a new album, indoor safari in which they recorded some of his favorite compositions. and he still strikes a good pose though he's got a few things to say to the kid who wanted to be a star. >> if nick in 2024 could talk to nick in 1974, is there something you know now that you wish you knew then? >> johnny cash once said to me,

incredibly disappointingly at the time, you have to figure out how to be yourself. i didn't know what he meant. i thought is that the best you can do? but actually, now i do. because when you are young, you are trying to be somebody that you are not. and you've got to welcome in the things that you don't really like about yourself, but welcome it in. if you can figure out how to be yourself, it makes things so much easier.

geoff: finally tonight, a story from the pbs news student reporting labs, our journalism training program for high school students. as part of our canvas coverage, we've featured some of the work from the southern california pst art initiative that examines how science and art collide. amna: student reporter ebonie shelley now has the story of two exhibitions at the academy museum of motion pictures that are part of pst and explore the relationship between movies and technology. >> i often say the color is interesting because if it's done right, you don't notice it. you are perceiving it and it's impacting you. it's not being drawn attention to. and so one of the things that we really hope with the exhibition is that it gives people a new understanding of what they're seeing on screen. ebonie: the academy museum in los angeles california is exploring the intersectionality of movies and technology as part of the pst art initiative with two exhibitions.

color in motion shows the history and subtlety of a color palette. >> we we wanted to show people the intention behind color, how it really is an art form in itself and one of the kind of hidden arts of cinema. so the gallery in which we show all the costumes and props we're showing technicolor to present because we're showing how color in front of the camera really impacted people's processes. we have natalie kalmus, who's the color director, and she's really influencing the color palette of a movie. and so we see her name on a lot of technicolor films. so you'll see her doing wizard of oz or movies, really notable technicolor movies from that era. she's the one who's responsible for setting those palletes. you see a lot of supersaturated, really vivid color films, especially in sci-fi today. ebonie: just downstairs, from dorothy's ruby slippers, cyberpunk envisions possible futures through cinema and showcases the lessons of sci-fi and advancing technology. >> i think one of the things that's fascinating for this

exhibition is we're looking at different time periods depicting the future and what they're bringing to that imagined future, their own anxieties and concerns. what happens is in these stories, groups of rebels and people who are marginalized are fighting for survival in the face of environmental collapse and societal ruin and in some ways, the technology is always pushing the filmmakers forward, and then the filmmakers are always pushing the technology forward. it's always trying to figure out something new. in figuring that out, they are kind of inventing or acquiring new technology. you have to come here and experience in person because it is immersive and exciting and seductive and, and, and amusing and fascinating and all the different ways that these films that we're trying to champion are. ebonie: from pbs news student reporting labs, i'm ebonie shelley in los angeles.

amna: remember there's a lot more online including a look at the growing pressure for congress to revive payments to americans who were exposed to radiation leftover from government nuclear testing. that is at pbs.org/newshour. amna: -- geoff: and that's the newshour for tonight amna: and i'm amna nawaz. on behalf of the entire newshour team, thank you for joining us. >> on an american cruise line journey, along the columbia and snake rivers, travelers retrace the route forged by lewis and clark more than 200 years ago. american cruise lines fleet of modern riverboats travel through american landscapes to historic landmarks, where you can experience local customs and cuisine. american cruise lines, proud sponsor of pbs news hour.

>> the ongoing support of these individuals and institutions, and friends of the newshour including the judy and peter bloom cochlear foundation. the ford foundation, working with visionaries on the front lines of social change worldwide. and with the ongoing support of these institutions. and friends of the newshour. this program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you.

hello, everyone and welcome to amanpour & company. here's what's coming up. >> we are just getting started.