promise ofof jobs from a proposd uranium mill is a tantalizing prospect for r economicacally devastated colorado town, until environmentalists step in to try to shut itit down. will jobs or healtlth and environment prevail? the film documentnts how a l local commumunity

cocomes to g grips with the did. >> we'e're trying to open up a uraranium mill,l, and they'y'e trying to shut it dowown. you know,w, it's s a big dreaea, and people arere looking forward to these e jobs out there. >> i w want them t to understatd that t there's people here. >> yeah, but i don't think they care about us people. i mean, there's no mpromise.. they don't care about us. >> nuclear power was supposed to be our future. a lot ofof this townwn was heree bececause of union carbide, and then when they left, we're still here. tthey're long gone now. >> it's almost l like we're still surviving, but it's just kind of likike thosese last few breaths. we want to keep breathing, but we've got to get something in here to do it. >> nuclear e energy remamains ourur largest s source of fuel that pproduces no cacarbon emissssions. we'll need to increase our supply of nuclear power.r. >> it t is the first uranium mil

to be builtlt in the unitited ss in 25 years. >> the onnly thing i'm inintered in is seeingng this mill get stopped. >> if you'rere only hearing the piece e about jobs, you're not p protectin your c community. i dare you u to do better. >> the people complaining the most are driving to the protests in their mercedes. you can only kick a dog so m many times s and pretty son he's going to turn around and bite you. >> wewe have a lolot of peoplple telling u us that thehe land is s more impoportant ththan i people. >> there is no impact from what we have done or what we e plan to do inin the futurure regarding uranium mine devevelopment. >> we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives, andd that meanans building a newew generatation of safefec, nuclelear powower plants in this cocountry. >> they're not telling you the truth. i'm realally disgusted,, and i'm against this mill.

> ♪ f for the one thatat fee >> i guess, ininitially, going into the film, i probably fefelt that ththe mill was a bad idea, like, why woululd anyone w want toto usher bacack in an inindusy that had obviously shortened people's lives and had crcreated a lot of environmemental havoc in t the area? so, i i was going to do the film in thihis communitity looking at thehe pros and consns wwithin that community. but what i found, which surprised me, isis that in that region, almost everyone was unanimously for this uranium mill. so, , i really w wanted the e fm to look from a very human perspective, why thahat would b, why people would usher back in this industry. >> as the mayor of naturita, i am very excited and hopeful that in 6 to 8 months we're going to start seeing ore trucks rolling through the town, we're going to sesee the mining picking up, anand we're goingng to see ththe milling moving forward. >> the towns of naturita

and nucla are located in ththe west in n the montrose co. >> can eveverybody hear me okay y out there?e? [microphone noise] [laughter] llet's s talk a bibit about the industryry in general, where our projeject is situated. of course, it is the uranium mining indusustry, nothing neneto you people. the supplply and demand got such that we couldld reopen these facilities, build this mill, and we're going to bring that to reality so that you can reap benefefits from that along wiwith the comompany. [applause] >> uranium has been a huge economic boom to this whole area. these small communities never had it as good as when there was uranium mining. and i do know that when you're struggling to put your kids through college, put food on the table, some of these arenas look very,

very appeaealing. andd i cannot t say that i if is in that boboat that i wouldn't e riright there swimming the same stream. is it t worth itit to open momore mines a and more mimills? to me, it is. it's an issue we all face, not just me or the miners. it's an issue thahat we all fac, becacause we do not give up our consumption of fossil fuels, and... so, where itit's going to lelea? ii'm just t a cowgirl. i don't know. >> after spending some time in this cocommunity, i really e empathized with their position. first of all, they have a very strong s sense of c community a and of place, and i feel, if you are from some of these smaller towns in america where community is so important, youou don't want to lose that. you know, people just say, "just pick up and go to a city, like, go somewhere else," and they will say,

"no, you know, we love it here. we've been here for generations." i think it started out for me that i thought it would be more of an environmental film, and very e early on i thought, this is m much more a stotory about t rural amemeri, and about economy, and how it's really unfair r when-- if someone is in a state of despeperation where thehey fl that they have to pit jobb againsnst health a and environo, that's like the expression, yoyou know, being between a rock and a hard place, that's just not a fair place to be. >> years wewe have been tryining to keep our r doors open, thinking, "any day now those jobs a are going t to be here." these are the only people that have come in and offered us jobs. ifif any of the people e here who are againsnst had come inin and saidid they had jobs to o mh it,t, we'd d be behind that, to. butt right now this is all we've got.t. and i just wanant the people hee to remembeber that thehey're k g 1,2,200 people e from sviviving, and that's really all i want them to know.

is that e every one of youu that has stood up against this couuld have brbrought in jobs for us, and d you didn''t yetet, 5 yeaears. so, , please, reremember that wheen you guys make ths decicision. we''re wawaiting, andnd we'veven waitining a long t time. thank you. >> the film also strikes on issusues of classism a as we, becaususe telluridide, which i e ofof their closest neigighbors, is a very wewealthy ski town, and i really felt that it's also looking at the issue of "you can be a an environmentalit if you can afford to be an environmentalist." soso, obviouslsly the people in telluride can afford to be concerned about their environment, andnd they are, and not a good or a bad thing, not a judgment, , but the people in nucla and naturita were extremely frustrated, because they felt like telluride and the opposition to the mill was really slowing down the process in getting the mill l built. >> energy fuels and the mill will happen because they have worked diligently in making

that procecess work. > > but the e process has hadd a little bit of extrtra help from some of those e people. >> t they haveept t this milill held up a long timeme. >> and there's nonot a job that doesn'n't have a d degree-- >> there's more pepeople killed in s skiing accicidents than minining accidenents. >> am i the ononly one that's realizeded that nucla started as a hippie commune that got taken over r by miners, and telluride started as a minining community that gotot taken ovever by hipp? >> [laughs] >> damon, theyey don't care. >> i think the bibiggest ingg that i haveve found is it's s nt thatat they dodon't carere it's just that theyey don't undederstand. you know, we'valalways beenn a g good neighbor, and i think in return ththat's what w we're asking g them to d, is bebe a good neighbor. come down and ununderstand u us, don't justst try to sasave us, because we d don't needd to be saved. we understand the regulations, we understatand the proemems, andnd we're willing t to work through them. >> and, hopefully, audiences will take... will just enjoy

something being balanced, because the film really is balanced andnd looking at b both sides. >> thcocotter uranium mil is about two mileles uphill from the a arkansas river that flows through our community.. i live a mile and a ququarter from the mill. and so i have two wells that were contaminated by the cotter ururanium mill. tthere are about 125 wells that werere contaminanated from cotter. nobody told us iin all those 8 yearss that the well was contaminated. we tested our welll when we first bought the propererty, we went to the countyty extension o off, and d they gave e us the botott, and d told us whwhat compaany toto send it to, but they faiailed to telell us ththe reallyy important thing. "hey, have it tested fofor radionucuclides and heavavy metatals." i do not believe that it is okay

for a company, in order to make profit, to pollute people against their will. i've heard enenergy fuel officis stand up in front of big crdsds and s say, "oh, that's s all from m the past.. it's all g going to be differenent now. we have bebetter regululations." you know what? you can look at what has been happening right here, this year, last mononth, last y year, the year beforere, and you can see e exactly how they will regulatete that mill. the claim m that nuclelear enery is enenvironmentally grgreen is just sisimply a m myth, because ththey'rre only looookig at thehe carbon didioxide releld at t the reactotor itself.. our r country hahas just been bamboozled witith this. for them to consider building new mills and creating new spots like this, this really, i think, emphasizes

the hidden costs that the people in the country never see that have to do with nuclear energy. >> rathther be out t mining than n harvestining tomatoeoes. frustration doesn't even come close to describing how we feel about our lives and our choices being taken away from us. when you've been out of work, your unemployment's running out, your savings is gone, your wife and youour kids are gone, people are getting vevery, very angry. if the economy falters any more, if p people donon't rerealize tt nuclear is our best option, telluride keeps fighting us tooth and nail, it might not happen, period. and i really hope i'm wrong. >> my hope for the film is that audiences who see the film understand that it's really

not a simple issue. wwhen we're talklking aboutt thingsgs like the big picture of energy, this is a very small microcosm example of people and lives that are affected by our energy pololicy, which, especially as americans, use more and more energy. momore than europeans, more, obviously, than the rest of the world, and yet we don't seem to have a very clear understanding of how we are supposed to keep supplying that energy. attention needs to be made to our energy needs and policies. >> across the atlantic, in south africa, plans to put an open coal pit mine next to a white rhino reserve put the health and welfare of both rhinos and local people at risk. jeff barbee repoports. poaching h has becomome cri. the number of rhino killed

ffor their horn has gone from 13 in 2007, to over 1,000 in 2013 alone. but a new danger to the park may be even more disastrous than the widespread poaching problem in the country. a new opepen-cast c coal minene on ththe southen n border of the park threatetens this, africa's most important rhino breeding ground. park officials here worry that this new danger could be a deep dark hole for rhino conservation, because the mine will pollute the air with dangerous gases, like toluene and benzene, and blow toxic coal dust over this wilderness area. the mine will also discharge acid mine water laced with sulfuric ac and radioactive byprododucts intnto the umumfolozi river, where the park'k's animals and the livestock of the surrounding community all drink. >> and when we comomhere, wewe come here to kind ofof, li, to unwind and experience the wild, and now there's a mine happening on

the edge of the wilderness, and it''s dilutinineverery experirience that the people are getting here. >> if hundreds of rhinos are killed for their horn, the population can be reestablished as long as enough are saved. but if the park is polluted with toxic mine waste, this last refuge of the rhino will be lost forever. >> where our concern lies is with respect to dust, because there's no analysis of the dust, in terms of the toxic components within that dust, given the coal mining, and the blasting, and that sorort of thing. nono you can f feel this wind. this wind is blowing across us right into the game reserve. so, they minine here, this southeastern wind will carry the dust, and the fallout will be in the park, in the wilderness area. >> if it goes ahead, the coal minine will be right against the boundary fence of the park.

this community of 1,200 people will be forcibly r relocateded off the land. another coal mine openeed in 2007, 10 kilometerawaway from the e village, and peoplele here e already fall sick from breathing the toxic dust. >> [speaking afrikaans] >> this is an aerial view of the older mine, whwhich nduna's nephew says is already causing their cate to die.. >> we are also feeling the consequences of them allowing that mine there. we've already witnessed some of our cows dying. the past year, i'm talking about from june last year till now, i myself have lost about 18 of them. >> to have so many fall ill and die means that the rhinos

and other animals next door in the papark who drink the same water are also in danger. in rural africa, cows are the real wealth, like living, walking bank accounts. to pay for a child's education, ndimande would sell a few cows, but now that is out of the question. this is a small community right on the edge of imfolozi park, and the community experiences a lot of benefits from the park itself, and they are very concerned about what's going to happen if the mine goes in just next to the park and right within their community. >> we are right next to the game reserve, and by us allowing the mine to take over this land there, and then it will mean those animals in the game reserve e will e end up sufferig because of the pollution. >> the dangers of having a mine right on the border of the park is not lost to roroger porter. he''s the former head of c conservation n and planning at the park's administration.

he agrees with ndimande that the mine could not only threaten the animals, but could make poaching worse. >> the whole securitity issue has not been addressed. mines tend to be a magnet, drawing in people froom surroundining areas because of the potential opportunity of jobs. universally, it's well known that levels of crime increase around mines. so, poaching is a crime. >> according to dr. player, if the mine and the poaching are not stopped, the whole web of life that has been protected here for over a century will fail. >> there's no doubtbt in my m md that if thahat mine went ahead, it would d destroy y the wildld. >> in a press statement, ibutho coal, who declined to comment on this story,y, tououted jobs as a major benefit to thehe local economy when the mine comes in.

but according to the community, the mine has not consulted them, or even told them where they will be forced to relocate to. for more than 100 years, the hluhluwe-imfolozi park has been a sanctuary for rhinos and many other endangered animals. it is a place that i inspires visitors, communities, and conservationists all over the world. to lose this area in a coal mining operation is unacceptable to dr. player. >> the people, they say, "it's impossible, you can't defeat these big mininng companies." and we said, "no, you can." but you've got to know that what you are doing is absolutely right. if you know that, then the rest is strategy and tactics. >> this is jeffrey barbee reporting from the hluhluwe-imfolozi park in south africa for link tv. >> in ecuador's highlands,

indigenous communitities fight foreign gold mining companies in an effort to save something even more precious than gold to them: their water. constantino de miguel reports. >> ecuador is a sosouth american country with a booming economy driven, in large part, by the world's appetite for its raw materials. ecuador is blessed with some of the richest biological diversity in the world. the wealth of its fauna and flora can be seen in the kimsakocha wetlands in the andes highlands. but beneath the ground there is gold and copper that are set to be exploited on a grand scale. the ecuadorian government awarded concessions to foreign companies to exploit this region, despite local opposition by peasants and indigenous communities whose agriculture depends on the local water resources. the 2,000 families that live on the kimsakocha asked the government to withdraw the mining concessions in 2007. but when ecucuadorian prpresidet rafael correa refused,

this set off an uprising against the mining companies and the government. >> [speaking spanish] >> farmers' opposition to mining also landed federico guzman, a peasant leader, in jail. >> [speaking spanish]

>> ecuador has attracted several foreign mining corporations interested in extracting gold, silver, copper, and other metals, mostly from the southern parts of the country. the projected mines are all large scale and stand to signifificantly alter the local ecosystems. toronto-based iamgold got the license to drill on kimsakocha in 2000, then sold the concessions to another canadian company, inv metals, in 2012. these protected natural and forest area of over 34,000 hectares is in danger, but the gold fever is pervasive. according to perez, the mining company already exploring in the area has destroyed the harmony of the local communities. >> [speaking spanish]

>> to obtain just two grams of gold, one ton o of rocks needs to bebe moveved, brokenen down, and sifted. the company will use heavy dump trucks, make big open pits, and use explosives to crash the mineral. an open pit gold mine is like a huge chemical plant where cyanide, mercury, and sulfuric acid are used to extract the mineral. these elements are mixed with the ore to separate gold from waste. the resulting waste will accumulate on mountain sides, contaminating water sources with heavy metals and chemicals harmful for human health. pressure to extract rich minerals like gold or copper from these highlands is increasing. chinese and canadian companies have succeeded to persuade the ecuadorian government

to grant licenses to open up this ground, ignoring the opposition from the native population. president rafael correa is now confronting the quechua indians after he pledged to defend their interests when he was elected 7 years ago. ppresident rafael correa has been concentrating power around his government after being reelected to a third term. now correa's leadership and popularity is threatened by grarassroots and indian movovements that oppose his d de to make mining a main source of revenue for ecuador. >> [speaking spanish]

>> ecuador faces a tough dilemma. should its natural resources be exploited on a large industrial scale? or should they be preserved for the sake of the environmental protection? according to this analyst, mineral riches are the only means to finance healtlth, education, and public works, so necessary for the development of the country. >> [speaking spanish]

>> [speaking spanish]

nina: our next speaker is someone who has been tirelessly and courageously y tackling some of the most--the thorniest, most persistent core contradictions that have roiled our society for centurieses and that are curreny morre hotly contesteted than e r today. she had done so as an activist, a leader, and a scholar, and is one of the most influential actors and penetrating thinkers on race, gender, immigration, social class, and poverty. you know, all those lilight-hearted topics that no one gets too