right, they better decide to join her or not. and if they give, we could have a deal. if not, we won't. and that's "hardball" for now, thanks for being with us. "the last word with lawrence o'donnell" starts right now. >> with competing symbolic plans, with no chance of becoming law flying around the capitol, tonight we will retreat from the partisan conflict and ask bill maher if he can make sense of it all. but first, let's review how we came to this crisis point. >> the people of america have been overcharged and on their behalf, i'm here asking for a refund. >> the world has come together to fight a new and different war. >> the military operations to disarm iraq. >> our debt ceiling is now $14.3 trillion. it will need to be raised in the

coming year. this, by the way, is a challenge for boehnor and the house. the president got into a bidding war with the republicans over more tax cuts. >> good evening again from new york. an agreement has been reached and the government shutdown has been averted. >> house and senate negotiators kick up high stakes budget negotiations led by vice president biden. >> there will be no increase in the debt limit. >> john boehner the other night in a room full of billionaires categorically refused to raise taxes. >> let's talk about the debt ceiling. officially, we hit it today. >> the senate, bipartisan working group lost one of its six members. >> speaker boehnor arrived this morning with a failed vote on a clean raise of the debt limit. >> the bipartisan debt limit and deficit reduction negotiations, led by vice president joe biden imploded today. >> having to stay there for the july 4th weekend, no one is shedding a tear over that. >> new news, only construed as

bad. >> john boehner pulled the plug. >> senate republicans are prepared to unveil yet another plan. >> senate minority leader, mitch mcconnell. >> the president announces that he has endorsed in principle what the gang of six or now the gang of seven is working on. >> the deal between president obama and speaker john boehner is in the works. >> no deal. >> breaking political news from washington tonight, house speaker john boehner has walked away from the negotiations. good evening from new york, one week from today the united states treasury will hit the debt ceiling, meaning for the first time in history, the united states government will not be able to pay all of its debts. house speaker john boehner is going back to the drawing board tonight after the new plan he unveiled last night during his first nationally televised rebuttal to president obama

turned out to be less than meets the eye, much less. the congressional budget office said today the boehnor plan would fall well short of the $1.2 trillion in spending cuts boehnor believed he had come up with. it turns out the boehnor specified cuts would be $300 billion less than what he thought. tea party republicans had already objected to the boehnor plan as being too small a spending cut to be worthy of their support. that had provoked house majority leader eric cantor to call for unity around the boehnor plan, telling house republicans to "quit grumbling and whining and call the president's bluff bypassing the boehnor plan." now that the boehnor plan has turned out to be a mirage, the grumbling and whining among republicans has resumed full force, but having heard eric cantor's announcement earlier

today that the boehnor bill was nothing but a symbolic stunt designed to call the president's bluff, the white house rushed to prove the president is not bluffing. the administration strongly opposes house passage of the amendment in the nature of a substitute to s-627 if s-627 is presented to the president, the president's senior advisors would recommend he veto this bill. senate majority leader harry reid assured reporters today the boehnor plan will never make it to the president's desk. >> speaker boehnor's plan is not a compromise. it was written for the tea party, not the american people. democrats will not vote for it, democrats will not vote for it, democrats will not vote for it, democrats will not vote for it. it's dead on arrival in the senate. the tea party is not -- that's a very, very scary thought.

they can either support the tea party and their plan, which has no chance of passing, or they can work with us. >> tea party organizers are claiming the boehnor plan actually violates the cut, cap, and balance pledge that 51 house republican lawmakers have signed. the ultraconservative foundations have both come out against the boehnor plan. the heritage foundation fears the boehnor plan could lead to tax revenue increases. heritage fellow david adington writes the second set in the plan is a set of recommendations from a new dozen member joint committee of congress while the second step may produce some useful spending cuts, the second step also allows the committee to propose raising taxes as part

of its unamendable, fast track, legislative package. david addington is also the former chief of staff to vice president richard chaney, the same richard chaney who infamously marked deficits don't matter. a poll found 68% say lawmakers should compromise in the debt debate. just 23% say law makers should stick to their principles. a poll taken overnight shows 83% are concerned about the potential of a debt default on august 2nd, and 53% say deficit reduction should be a combination of spending cuts and revenue increases. and, a "washington post" abc news poll asked respondents what changes support to raising the

debt. 72% raising taxes on incomes over $250,000 a year. 66% raise social security taxes on people with incomes over $103 7,000 a year. 64% support raising taxes on hedge fund managers. 61% support raising medicare premiums were wealthy retirees. 59% support raising taxes on oil and gas companies. joining me now is msnbc political analyst howard fineman, editorial director for the huffington post media group. thanks for joining me tonight. howard, what's the latest reporting on what's breaking here on the boehnor plan. they went into the afternoon thinking they had a plan that was what it said it was and the question was how do we get everyone to coalesce around it, now the plan turns out to be much less than speaker boehnor

thought it was, where do they go from here? >> well, what's breaking on the boehnor plan is the boehnor plan is broken. it's broken by the numbers and it's broken politically. that group of the -- the cut, cap, and balance crowd, that's 51 people said in the republican side, were not voting for it, would be a violation of your pledge to be part of the cut, cap, and balance group if you vote for it. so that 51 -- those 51 republican votes are off the table. lots of other republicans are said they can't go for it. the anti-tax crowd is against it, and even david addington is worried about a power in congress by this special committee, the super congress, and david addington's the guy who did all the lawyering for dick cheney to start a war without permission.

there's going to be lots of republicans and democrats who are going to vote against it on that basis, leaving the numbers aside. >> howard, it seems to me we're in the zone of symbolic bills being passed around. harry reid's bill, which inconveniently for the president and the democrats, gives up any claim toward getting tax revenues in the mix, meets the republicans on exactly their original terms, which is a dollar-for- dollar-fo dollar-for-dollar match. but it seems that the reid plan was put out there simply so the republicans could reject it so then the democrats could say look, we offered them everything they wanted and they rejected it. i don't get the feeling that harry reid is absolutely crushed that the republicans rejected his plan. it seems like that was part of what his plan was designed to achieve. >> sure. i completely agree. we're at the point now where

barring some kind of crazy miracle, there's not going to be any deal, so the two sides are busy positioning themselves for the post-catastrophe spin. that's what's going on right now. if i had to bet where we're going to end up, it's we're going to end up with some kind of short-term extension, no big deal, and then everybody's going to blame everybody else for the fact we didn't get anything done. you talk about the gang of six, there's a gang of 300 million out there, the american people, who are completely fed up with this. they elect representatives to take care of housekeeping chores, and this is a grand housekeeping chore, and they are failing at the process of doing it. >> howard, i'm wondering, does the same thing go for -- it is my sense it does. boehnor is actually not the most disappointed guy in the capitol, he knew he was putting together something that wasn't real and that cbo shooting it down is not

some big shock to him, that he was just putting together to claim he was putting something together. >> that's true too. maybe there was a smidgen of sincerity there and knowing him and having covered him, but yeah, they both want to be able to say after we all go off the edge of a cliff that it was the other person's fault, and that's exactly the situation we're in right now, and it's a dangerous and unsettling one, beginning to really bother the american people in a way that i -- you know, talking to people on the hill today, the phones were -- lines were continuing to burn up, white house switchboard was down for awhile it was so overflowing, people are disgusted with this spectacle. the president started out months ago saying he didn't want to play political games with the debt ceiling.

he wanted a clean bill, didn't want a grand compromise on the budget, then he decided to get involved in the game and try to work out a grand compromise, but the problem was he was dealing with a incapacitated partner in john boehner who could never, and probably can never, deliver his own caucus for a vote. >> that vote, the boehnor vote, was supposed to be tomorrow. they've given up because they don't have a boehnor bill anymore. howard, it seems to me what each side is trying to say it's their fault it came to this, and they need to say to their own sides, boehnor needs to be able to say to the republicans and the tea party, i never gave up, i was fighting all the way to the end to get us to this, but when we get to august 1st, there is a very simple way out, it's a way that has been used more times than they can count, which is the one-page, one-sentence bill, which simply raises the debt ceiling.

boehnor has said repeatedly, we must raise the debt ceiling. mcconnell has said repeatedly, the president says, as a last resort, if nothing else, we must raise the debt ceiling. if we get to august 1st, and there is nothing else, can the momentum build to get a bare majority vote in each body for the one-sentence bill? >> yeah, i think that's what's going to happen, and i think this all will have been a bad nightmare of months of negotiating over something that shouldn't have been negotiated to begin with. lawrence, this is all a distraction from the two fundamental problems we're facing in american economics in society, one is the creation of jobs and demand for the economy, and the other is how we pay for the wars and the welfare state that we've built as the baby boom ages, medicare, social security, wars, taxes, what do we do about all that? this wasn't meant to be the place to have that debate, and in the end it's not going to be the place where the debate will be had.

>> msnbc political analyst howard fineman, thank you very much for joining us tonight, howard. >> thank you, lawrence. >> coming up, we'll get bill maher's take on everything from the debt ceiling crisis to all those pledges presidential candidates are signing. plus, fox news decides to rewrite its past, soviet style. it has pulled some embarrassing stuff about the murdoch scandal from its website, but we'll show it to you anyway. fox news gets tonight's rewrite. >> ( rooster crows ) >> by 2020, 50 billion network devices will roam the earth. that's seven devices per person. this will change how we work in ways we've never before imagined. what do you need to secure your people, their devices, and your business? a network that can evolve and grow to protect your human network.

can be confusing... ♪ for most people, it's a game of chance. ♪ for dentists, the choice is clear. fact is, more dental professionals brush with an oral-b toothbrush than any other brush. so choose the brand more dentists use -- oral-b. trust the brush more dentists and hygienists use, oral-b.

and started earning loads of points. you got a weather balloon with points? yes i did. [ man ] points i could use for just about anything. ♪ ♪ there it is. [ man ] so i used mine to get a whole new perspective. ♪ [ male announcer ] the new citi thankyou premier card gives you more ways to earn points. what's your story? citi can help you write it. coming up, bill maher joins me with a look at the debt ceiling and the politics of calamity and how grover norquist's tv career got started. and later, how republican anti-union hysteria has led to defunding the faa. that's right, the federal

aviation administration, the people who make sure that you're airplanes land safely. [ jasmine ] i want to be a pediatrician so i want to major in biology. miss gopie is the best teacher i ever had. she's amazing, i love her. [ jade ] i'm teaching jasmine ap biology. i knew she had the talent... i always pushed her. [ jasmine ] her class you literally have to think, like it takes so long to do her homework. [ jade ] she's gained the confidence that she can achieve anything. [ jasmine ] i'm going to be a pediatrician... and i'm going to make this dream come true. a 100 percent. ♪ my name is lacey calvert and i'm a yoga instructor. if i have any soreness, i'm not going to be able to do my job. but once i take advil, i'm able to finish out strong. it really works! [ laughs ] [ male announcer ] make the switch. take action. take advil. our girl's an architect. our boy's a genius.

we are awesome parents! biddly-boop. [ male announcer ] if you find a lower rate on a room you've booked, we won't just match it. we'll give you $50 towards your next trip. [ gnome ] it's go time. part of the reasons we've spent the last month arguing about the debt ceiling is half of the new tea bag congress signed a vow to never raise taxes. someone just handed them something, it wasn't a gun, crucifix, or a fetus, so they signed it. why? because we're rugged individu individualists who love freedom, now excuse us as we sign this document telling us to do what we're told.

>> what the united states government careening towards a default op its death for the first time in history, presidential candidates signing more pledges than they can keep track of, and with the advice of experienced economists being ignored by the economically illiterate tea party, who better to calm a nation than the will rogers of hbo. joining me now, host of hbo's "real time with bill maher," bill maher. thank you for joining me tonight. >> thank you for that introduction. >> doesn't get better than that. did you see the president's speech last night and the boehnor follow-up, and what was your take on it? >> disappointed. terribly disappointed. i don't know what's going on in this man's mind. i like obama so much, i'm always trying to understand what he's

dealing with, and i understand he's got a lot to deal with, washington's very tough, and the republicans are certainly [ bleep ] oh, sorry, wrong network for that, but i don't get this giving away the store. i never thought he'd be caving on the revenue side of it. i thought that was his line in the sand. and he has this reputation as a guy who's always caving into the republicans. i thought he can't do it this time. if he does it again, they will just own him. they will know that all you ever have to do with this guy is wait and you get everything you want, and he does it. i don't understand how this is a win for him. he's the reasonable guy, so what he's the reasonable guy. how do you win if they get everything they want and then you sign it? >> well, i've been patient on this question of is he caving now because of this principle of these negotiations that nothing is agreed to until everything is agreed to, and we seem to be now in this zone of trading bluff

proposals, like the harry reid proposal, which is the one they give up on any tax revenue, the republicans immediately shot it down, so it starts to -- the president supported that one, and that's the one he'd be caving on tax revenue, except it seems it's dead, so all they really did was expose the republicans for not really meaning what they say, meaning here, we're going to give you everything you want and then they watch the republicans just turn that down. >> what sort of a way to run a government is this? you worked in government, i didn't. it's unprecedented as far as anything i certainly remember. you know, if i was obama, i would have just started this debate differently months ago by saying look, you're trying to link two things that shouldn't be linked, the debt ceiling debate and the budget. just start there. he should start there. the debt ceiling is all about

the past, the budget is all about the future. now, let's just start with that premise. and, of course, he never really plays on his own turf. he's always, it seems, arguing with himself about their agenda, never arguing for the democratic agenda. i keep saying this on my show, wouldn't it be a tragedy if we elected a democratic president, then four years go by and we never attempt democratic policies? we're not instituting democratic policies, the policies we are instituting are going to fail and bring the economy down, and then the democratic president is going to get blamed. blamed but really for using republican policies. >> which brings us, of course, to grover norquist, who i think, bill, tell me if i'm right, i think the first time i saw grover on tv was on your politically incorrect, your comedy central version, he was one of the panelist.

now, i think, everyone gets it. they get who he is and what his role is, but norquist said some years ago that his mission was to make sure that if a democrat were somehow, by some miracle, to win the white house again, that the democrat would not be able to govern as a democrat and that seems to be what we're seeing this year, whereas you put it, the entire debate is taking place so far in republican territory. >> yes. well, yes, i will take credit for -- or blame really for grover norquist. he was one of the many conservatives, ann culter, lauren ingram, we needed foils for me, and, i guess, they are getting the last laugh since they are actually controlling america now. but yes, grover certainly has not changed.

i think he came up with this pledge in high school and has not changed. no matter what happens in the world, we cannot raise taxes, and, of course, getting people to sign a pledge so american, because it's part of that same intellectual sink hole where we get three strikes you're out, and zero tolerance, things where people do not have to think. that's what americans, especially our leaders, are always trying to do, get to a place where you don't have to think about anything, which is ironic, these people claim they are belovers of the founding fathers and the constitution, they'd want you to elect someone who's smart and honest to make decision because they are running the government, not blacktopping your driveway. >> this flurry of pledges the republican candidates have been signing seem to have provoked you this past week to come up with your own pledge. can you describe that to my audience in the cleanest terms

possible? >> cleanest terms? no, sorry. well, i just said -- i said as long as these pledges are here to stay, you know, we were saying this somewhat ironically, that i would make the candidate or try to make them sign my pledge, which had a number of planks, i don't know if i can remember them all. one is after you sign this pledge, no more stupid pledges. i think one of them was no more flag pins, because you're running for the president of the united states, we can safely assume you're on the team. i think one of them was no pledge shirts, no eating in diners, no doing any of that home-spin nonsense you wouldn't normally do. stop kissing ass to iowa, and also stop lying to the american people. stop telling them our best days are ahead. be honest and tell them we are gracefully descending into a secondary position in the world and you'll do your best to just

help us stick the landing. >> i assume the signatures are coming in slowly on that pledge, bill. >> yes, very slowly. >> there's always that torn position, i think, that you can find yourself in -- as trying to make light of the situation out there. as we approach certain events, is there a temptation, is there a temptation over there at "real time" to actually want to see, maybe for a few minutes, a day or two, the country go into default just to see what it looks like and see what comedic material might come out of that? >> no, because i have money too. >> oh, that's right. i forgot about that. >> yeah, yeah. all of us who have money and bank accounts, i don't think -- no, i don't think there's any amount of comedic gold that

would be worth losing the real gold, and that could really happen. you know, what i would like to see obama do is to challenge the banks and the wall street to bail us out. we've bailed them out. a couple of months ago i remember he went to the chamber of commerce to apologize to them. why is he apologizing to them? government bailed out business, not the other way around. aig would be a halloween supply store right now if it wasn't for government. there would be no american automotive business, no banks and wall street as we see them today. and we need money now, and apparently we can't raise taxes, but we should. we should ask them for a one-time giant tax increase that we'd put in a pot to create jobs, infrastructure, all the things we need to get the economy going, then we'll pay you back later, just like you paid us back, why can't it work in the other way? >> bill, the -- days left now in

this thing before we get to august 2nd and the whole question of default. they still seem to be in the bluff stage of we're going to make this proposal, which is really just a bluff to get you to do this. we still seem to be in that zone. as we go into the weekend, it still comes down to, in the end, the only thing they actually really have to do is pass a one-sentence bill, which changes numbers. that's all it does. they've done it countless times in the past, republicans have voted for that, democrats have voted for that. when we get there, if we get there this weekend, is that where obama should stand, just get up there and say okay, you can do this, and you can do this in a half an hour, pass this one-sentence bill. we've tried all the negotiations we can. >> well, sure. that's what he should do, but you have to understand, that's not what the republicans want to happen.

i think there's this misconception out there that the two sides, you know, the media, of course, presented them falsely as just equally obstinate, that we're working towards this solution and that everybody -- nobody wants to see a calamity. no, i disagree with that. i think a lot of republicans do want to see a calamity. this is what will bring down the obama presidency. they didn't have a clinton there in obama. there was no scandal. he has nothing that they could launch a crusade about. this is it. this is what they are launching their crusade about to ever destroy his presidency, so it's not really in their interest. if they were really about reducing the deficit and the debt, they would have taken the deal he had on the table originally that was a $4 trillion reduction that had almost everything they wanted. >> bill, if we get to that spot and there is some kind of default, from where you're

sitting, which i think anything is a better perspective than inside the beltway in washington, what is your sense of where the blame would fall and how the country would react to the various political players? would it just be condemning them all or would they recognize obama tried harder than anyone else to solve this and the others were obstructionists, how do you think it would play? >> i think in the short-term, they would blame the republicans more. i mean, that's what the polls say now, obama does look reasonable to the people in general, and i think they kind of get it. they certainly want his plan more than they want the republican plan. they would rather have this balanced approach that includes revenues, you know, we can't even say the word taxes anymore, not that there are taxes, they are closing loop holes on taxes. but this is july of 2011. what it would look like in november of 2012, people forget. and all they'll remember then,

the reality they will be confronted with then, is a horrible economy. and again, this is why it's such a bad strategy, i think, to not attempt democratic policies, because if the economy is going to go down, they are going to blame the democratic president. and they are going to think this is what you get when you elect a democrat, but really what we elected was a democrat who acted like a republican. >> and that's going to have to wrap it for us tonight, bill, we're running out of time, bill maher, of hbo's "real time," thank you very much for joining me tonight. >> my pleasure, lawrence. >> coming up, fox news has ended one of its most embarrassing segments, that's in tonight's rewrite. and if you're watching right now on a jetblue flight or virgin american, you might want to know republicans have decided to defund the faa. not the daa, the faa, the

federal aviation administration, the people who make sure that airplane you're on right now actually lands safely. that's coming up. [ male announcer ] get ready for the left lane. the volkswagen autobahn for all event is back. right now, get a great deal on new volkswagen models, including the jetta, awarded a top safety pick by the iihs. that's the power of german engineering. hurry in and lease the jetta s for just $179 a month. ♪ visit vwdealer.com today. ♪ and when it does,t can turn romantic anytime. men with erectile dysfunction can be more confident in their ability to be ready with cialis for daily use. cialis for daily use is a clinically proven low-dose tablet you take every day so you can be ready anytime

the moment's right. tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications, and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache, or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. ask your doctor if cialis for daily use is right for you. for a 30-tablet free trial offer, go to cialis.com.

this, by the way is a challenge for boehnor and the house, his worst challenge, he must, and he knows it pass a debt ceiling increase. its website, but not before we grabbed what they don't want you to see. and next, if you're watching this show from an airplane tonight or you have flight reservations any time soon, you might want to know the

republican chairman of the transportation committee is cutting funding for airplanes, including airport safety improvements. s, including airport safety improvements. s, including airport safety improvements. s, including airport safety improvements. os, including airport safety improvements. rs, including airport safety improvements. ts, including airport safety improvements. every day, all around the world, energy is being produced to power our lives. while energy developement comes with some risk, north america's natural gas producers are committed to safely and responsibly providing decades of cleaner burning energy for our country, drilling thousands of feet below fresh water sources within self contained well systems and using state of the art monitoring technologies, rigorous practices help ensure our operations are safe and clean for our communities and the environment we are america's natural gas. uh-huh. jeff! honey, i can't walk any faster. [ female announcer ] oscar mayer deli fresh turkey

comes in a clear pack... [ cellphone beeps ] [ jeff ] ooh. thanks hun! [ female announcer ] ...so the freshness you see is what you taste. ♪ it doesn't get better than this ♪

as we've noted here, the debt ceiling limit is something that used to be raised as a matter of routine, there was little debate and no real chance of failure because everyone knew, even those voting against it, that it simply had to be raised. the same holds true for funding the federal aviation administration. long-term funding was approved time and again until four years ago, then congress began approving short-term extensions, 20 of them in the last four years, but last friday night, an anti-union stand by republicans blocked faa funding and cost the nation's airports and thousands of workers dearly. since friday, nearly 4,000 faa employees in 35 states have been furloughed. traffic controllers are not affected but engineers, scientists, computer specialists

and others are because the faa is no longer authorized to receive the tax money collected on airline tickets, which is directed towards the fund that pays faa salaries, and $2.5 billion in construction projects in all 50 states are now suspended, as are the jobs those projects provide to outside contractors. among them, the installation of new runway lights at airports from seattle to houston to new york, building new air traffic control towers and other facilities and strengthening control towers in earthquake-prone cities. the battle started in april when republicans passed a long-term funding bill only on the condition that employees be restricted in how they voted to unionize. the change would require any worker who didn't vote to be counted as a "no" vote. senate democrats insisted that

language be taken out, and then house transportation committee chairman, john mika, introduced a version that would strip federal subsidies to 13 rural airports that depend on that funding. including airports that just happen to be in the home states of senate majority leader harry reid in nevada, senate transportation committee, jay rockefeller in west virginia, and max baucus in montana, all three are, of course, democrats. according to the associated press, mika acknowledges that he inserted the airport language into the extension bill partly as a means to send the senate a message that we want this finally resolved. instead, thousands of public and private sector workers are now unemployed, small town airports are suffering, and big airports aren't getting any safer. all because republicans who want to make it harder for workers to

unionize. congressman mika also opposed the move earlier this year to move more air traffic controllers on light nat shift after some of them fell asleep on duty. coming up, fox news polls behind the scenes video from the website after contributors are caught saying they don't want to cover the news corp. phone hacking scandal. that's in tonight's rewrite. and later, the new poll from the pew research center shows the median income of a white household is now 18 times more than a hispanic household and 20 times more than that of an african-american family. the country's wealth gap gets bigger. melissa harris-perry joins me. [ male announcer ] this is the network. a network of possibilities.

excuse me? my grandfather was born in this village. [ automated voice speaks foreign language ] [ male announcer ] in here, everyone speaks the same language. ♪ in here, forklifts drive themselves. no, he doesn't have it. yeah, we'll look on that. [ male announcer ] in here, friends leave you messages written in the air. that's it right there. [ male announcer ] it's the at&t network. and what's possible in here is almost impossible to say. my son and i never missed opening day.

but with copd making it hard to breathe, i thought those days might be over. so my doctor prescribed symbicort. it helps significantly improve my lung function, starting within 5 minutes. symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. with symbicort, today i'm breathing better, and that means... game on! symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. [ whistle ] with copd, i thought i might miss out on my favorite tradition. now symbicort significantly improves my lung function, starting within 5 minutes. and that makes a difference in my breathing. today i'm back with my favorite team. ask your doctor about symbicort. i got my first prescription free. call or click to learn more. [ male announcer ] if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.

media matters reports fox news is ending its behind the brakes segments, which were streamed online to show you what was happening in the fox news studio during the commercial breaks. we'll show you why fox is killing behind the breaks. that's in the rewrite. and a new poll shows the wealth gap in this country is the largest its been in a quarter of a century. melissa harris-perry will join me. ask me. even if you think your mattress is just fine... ask me what it's like to get your best night's

sleep every night. why not talk to someone who's sleeping on the most highly recommended bed in america... it's not a sealy... or a simmons... or a serta... ask me about my tempur-pedic. ask me how fast i fall asleep. ask me about staying asleep. these are actual tempur-pedic owners! ask someone you know---check out twitter... try your friends on facebook. you'll hear it all...un-edited. ask me how it feels after 10 years. ask me if it's a good value. just ask me. there are 4 million tempur-pedic owners! and they're more satisfied than owners of any traditional mattress brand. ask me why i feel better every morning. ask me why someone who's never had an ache or a pain is in love with this bed. start asking real owners. ask me how we took the first step... take the first step right now! call or click today for your free information kit with dvd. call the number on your screen or visit tempurpedic.com. tempur-pedic. the most highly recommended bed in america.

time for tonight's rewrite. these are difficult days for everyone working in the rupert murdoch media empire, including those who haven't in any way yet been tarnished by the british phone hacking scandal, including, of course, our good friends over at fox news. it is an especially tough time to appear on the show "fox news watch," the network's program tasked with covering the news media. imagine how wicked it is to sit there on that show and not dare say a word about the single biggest story in the news media since the saga of who in the bush administration leaked what to whom about valerie wilson. and, it is a truly terrible time for that show to have employed the otherwise fascinating device called "behind the breaks," an online video stream showing what

everyone on the show talks about during the commercial breaks. here is a "behind the breaks" reality moment from the july 9th edition of the show. it begins with allen kohns asking cal thomas a question we all knew the answer to already. >> cal short for calvin? >> yes, it is. >> you're calvin? >> that's my middle name, yes. >> what's your first name? >> john. >> why did you go with cal rather than john? >> i wanted to identify with the cal ripkin jr. >> okay, so that is a great example of what you could learn during a talkative commercial break. i knew cal was short for calvin but didn't know calvin was actually cal thomas' middle name, didn't know he was named after cooledge's two sons and didn't know he didn't know why

he calls himself cal instead of john. that's a wonderful example of what "behind the breaks" could be at its very best, trivia revelations about the cal thomas' of the world, but then cal thomas made the mistake of thinking because they were off the air and just talking for the internet, it was safe to bring up the subject that no one at fox news could talk about. >> anybody want to bring up the subject we're not talking about tonight for the streamers? >> sure, go ahead, cal. >> i'm not going to touch it. >> don't worry, i'm going to let you see that again. it is too perfect a glimpse inside the collective mind of fox news. there's cal thomas saying, does anyone want to bring up the subject we're not talking about today, by which, of course, he means the single biggest story about the news media that's out there, the thing a show like

this is supposed to spend all of its time on. this is a show about the news media, the scandal involving their boss, rupert murdoch. jim pinkerton then dares cal thomas to bring it up, thomas dares pinkerton to bring it up, and thomas in effect speaks for all of them by saying i'm not going to touch it. here it is again. >> anybody want to bring up the subject we're not talking about today for the streamers? >> sure, go ahead, cal. >> go ahead. >> i'm not going to touch it. >> don't bother going to the fox news website to try to find fox news watch's behind the breaks segments. for some reason, fox news has killed the "behind the breaks" segments. a nd scru bbed them from th eir web websit

i ate breakfast and got heartburn, third day this week. so i took my heartburn pill and some antacids. we're having mexican tonight, so another pill then? unless we eat later, then pill later? if i get a snack now, pill now? skip the snack, pill later... late dinner, pill now? aghh i've got heartburn in my head. [ male announcer ] stop the madness of treating frequent heartburn. it's simple with prilosec otc.

one pill a day. twenty-four hours. zero heartburn. no heartburn in the first place. great.

research center reports the median wealth of white households is now 20 times of black households and 18 times that of hispanic households. these are the largest since the government began publishing such data a quarter of a century ago and twice the size of the ratios that had prevailed between these three groups for the two decades prior to the great recession that technically ended in 2009. the figures show that the recession hit black and hispanic households much harder than white households.

from 2005 to 2009, inflation adjusted median wealth fell by 66% among hispanic households and 53% among black households compared with 16% among white households. as a result of those recession-driven declines, in 2009, the typical black household had just 5,677 dollars in wealth with wealth measured as assets minus debts. the typical hispanic household had $6,325 in wealth and the typical white household had $113,149 in wealth. collapsing housing markets were the principle cause of the erosion of the household wealth among all groups, with hispanics actually hit hardest by the meltdown in the housing market because a disproportionate share

of hispanics live in states that experienced the steepest declines in housing values. joining me now, columnist for "the nation" and msnbc contributor, melissa harris-perry. thanks for joining me tonight, melissa. >> thanks, great to be here with you. >> i just mentioned a fact, i thought everyone knew, and a panel discussion that the black unemployment rate is always double the white unemployment rate, there is always a recession, a depression level of unemployment in black america, and that was greeted as news and unknown. these are the kinds of numbers that america doesn't get in its normal consumption of how's the economy doing. >> sure, look, i've said the same thing. when we got to, you know, coming up towards 10% unemployment in america overall and particularly when we saw, for example, tea party activists just angry about this, and i thought sure, we

should be angry about that, but man, black folks would have been angry for a couple of decades now, beside ourselves with anger. 10% would look like huge success, but part of what we want to remember is these stats are worse than the unemployment stats, worse than the wages. wealth is not a wage. wage is we assume will eventually come back when jobs come back, but this lost time in building wealth, you can't make that up on the other side. >> the senate finance committee had a hearing on approaches, robert greenstein from the senate on budget priorities testified and made the point the united states has higher degrees of poverty and inequality than most other western industrialized nations, deficit reduction ought not to make these problems worse, history shows this principle can be honored if there's a will to do so, the three major deficit

reduction packages of the last three decades, 1990, '93,' 97 packages all adhered to this principle. bob greenstein sounds like a lone voice in the capitol, making this point a point to krr in the deficit reduction packages. >> instead of saying a rising tide lifts all boats, people on the bottom, you'll come along, instead you focus on how to make things better on the bottom with the assumption of raising the floor will bring everybody up. these questions about economic equalities also produce themselves on health outcomes, so we see this huge wealth gap, but the wealth gap looks similar in the racial health gap, so if you, for example, take just african-americans out of the overall american population and look at them as a nation on questions of infant mortality, for example, african-americans as a group are doing far worse than any industrialized nation

on infant mortality. you can do the same thing on diabetes, on heart disease, so these have real impacts for the whole life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness piece. >> and these are indications of crisis conditions that we're talking about here, and yet it is very difficult for the media to take note of it. there will be a pew research student like this that will come out, we'll address it, and the media will very quickly flow back to treating the overall economic numbers, in which these numbers remain absorbed and unnoticed. >> i think it's in part this notion is talking about specific communities is somehow special interest advocacy rather than really think about what americans need overall, and you can tell the story of the american crisis through the story of those who are most vulnerable. take predatory lending, for example, that's happening four decades in black and brown communities before it show