Skip to main content

tv   Hardball With Chris Matthews  MSNBC  August 14, 2012 2:00pm-3:00pm PDT

2:00 pm
thanks very much for watching today. i'm karen finney in for martin bashir and chris matthews picks things up right now with "hardball." robbing seniors to pay paul. let's play "hardball." good evening, i'm chris matthews in new york. let me start with the republican cold feet over paul ryan. their one-day wonder has become dare i say it? a bit of a morning glory. bloomed saturday, kept the blush sunday, by yesterday, the troops were restless. why on god's earth had mr. romney gone out and found the one candidate that could nail them in the coffin with the budget -- throwing mama off the cliff to finance big tax cuts
2:01 pm
for top 1%? now, we know what's worse than being tagged for republicans voting for the ryan budget, it's having the master mind behind it on the ticket. i give you the next president of the united states, romney said on saturday. getting it wrong wasn't the gaffe, it was some fear, naming ryan himself. this guy could be worse than quyale because this time, the presidential candidate and his team knew the weakness, saw the trouble they were walking into before they walked into it and that's not the best argument for mr. romney's business. this may be the worst merger since aol bought time warner. with me are bob shrum and michael steele. i want to start with you, michael because you're always a stra straight shooter around here. is cold feet too cold a term to tough a term for the feeling some are having about ryan with
2:02 pm
his difficult budget to sell? >> i don't think it's so much cold as it is nervous. i think that as the dust has settled on this and particularly those down ballot congressional races, we're only talking about 25-seat change in the house. when half are close to half of these seats may be in districts that are too close to call for some republicans, if it becomes a major concern, now that as you already noted, the conversation had shifted away from even you know, taxes and tax returns and the like to okay, let's talk about the specifics of your budget cht let's talk about the specifics of medicare and i've begun to hear a little bit of that rumbling among republicans. are a little nervous about it. >> politico's story today was headlines gop pros fred over paul ryan reports. quote, away from the cameras and with all the usual assurances that people aren't being quoted
2:03 pm
by name, there's an unmistakable consensus among republican operatives in washington. romney has taken a risk with ryan that has only a modest chance of going right and a huge chance of going wrong. the most -- to hair on fire anger that romney had seated the election. bob, your thoughts. you've dealt with this guy, romney, before. this wouldn't be the best argument for his business with the first big decision he had to make, he picks a guy that's got nails coming out of his head politically. >> i think he waited too long and then got pushed by the right for this choice. i've talked to some of these republican pros. they read the the polls. they know what's going to happen. one who doesn't like obama at all said to me on sunday, short of economic armageddon, it's going to be hard for obama to
2:04 pm
loose. romney had a plan. people were going to blame obama. give romney a try. what has happened with paul ryan is that this has now shifted. the president was trying to shift it all along to who stands up for the middle class. this now confirms that. the shift in the dimension to debating privatetizing social security, voucherizing medicare, slashing education. they're worried not only about what's going to happen to the ticket, but to republican control of the house, which they thought was pretty much assured up until last week. >> i thought they wanted all the focus on obama as a referendum. like how's the guy doing out there on the mound? still got his fastball? you know, the old metaphors. now, the focus is on what about this new kid with his really strong ideas? is that what you want the focus if you're a republican operative right now? >> no, i think bob is right.
2:05 pm
have to agree with him on this point. the the focus originally as you set up, was about this referendum. we want this to be a referendum on the last four years. we want this to be on the spending. the debt. the solyndras of the world. let's talk about what the administration has failed to do, create jobs. now, it is bold. the boldness of this choice is it shifts the debate from a referendum to a choice election. where you get to have a philosophical discussion and choice. >> who wanted that? >> chris, that's a good question. >> the tdemocrats wanted it. bob wanted that. >> i didn't hear anyone talking about making this a choice election up until this past weekend. everyone had bought into the argument and the fact that this should be a referendum on the last four years, not a choice between conservatives. >> let me even the tables here,
2:06 pm
bob. like we saw bill clinton run against george senior. there were some problems in his personal life. give him a break. we need a new kid in there. we knew the fact reagan was sort of an erratic far right winger, but they still said we needed a change in '92 and in another race. people wanted a change. in '80. so even if you have questions about romney, big questions and concerns about ryan, how does that shift away from the main concern of the country right now, the shape of the economy come november? will they still be thinking about ryan the first week of november or the most recent unemployment rate? >> introducing ryan has put romney in a tough spot. he was already hurting. president was making real progress in making this a choice election in terms of bain, in terms of the offshore accounts,
2:07 pm
his tax plan and his own taxes, but this seals the deal and you're now in a situation where basically, mitt romney and i call this now the ryan romney ticket, not the other way around. the substance here is coming from ryan. he's going to have to defend a whole series of positions that are profoundly unpopular. it's pretty amazing, chris, you've been around this for a long time, to see gop pros criticizing the nominee. >> here's mark mckinnon. sure they don't want to hear from this guy. he told politico, quote, i think it's a very bold choice. ryan, an exciting and interesting pick. it's going to elevate the campaign. it means romney ryan can run on principles and provide real direction and vision for the republican party and probably lose. maybe big. how's that for an endorsement? and some of those anonymous republicans out there politico spoke to are concerned about
2:08 pm
their prospects, house and senate races, candidates for house and senate seats. quote, very not helpful down ballot. very, said one top republican. so this is the day that music died. one republican operative said. the operative said every house candidate is racing to get ahead of this issue. michael, it seems to me, candidates don't tend at the presidential level to lose over particular issues like medicare and social security. they tend to make it a much bigger question. but house and senate, i keep thinking of all those people we know. jeremiah denton, from alabama and hawkeneins from florida. you can go through the list of people who have lost just over medicare or social security position. >> and i think that's kind of what has folks nervous. they look back on 2010, they look back at the primaries where you know, folks got into a lot of trouble based on their vote
2:09 pm
for the ryan budget, so the reality now shifts to this full frontal assault by the romney ryan team to kind of push and redirect the conversation. now, i still think they can get this done. i understand with mr. mckinnon is saying and i think they can make this about big thing, but how they frame that argument to both your points, the questions about the impact of the ryan budget and whether or not and you saw it on 60 minutes, chris, romney kind of backing waway frm this. >> we pointed that out yesterday. let's talk about psycho babble now, my favorite topic in politic. you guys are both old enough to remember when cher broke up with sunny and back when martin and lewis broke up. for some reason, starting monday, ryan and romney stopped campaigning together and romney went back to the old romney. here's a quote about this.
2:10 pm
ever since splitting up the campaign duties with ryan this weekend, mitt romney seems to have lost the energy he had on the trail with his vp pick. take a look at this afternoon with coal miners. something about, keep this team together, i would argue, but they aren't and you saw what happened this morning. let's watch. >> that's an impressive scene. right here and right behind me. i'm impressed with men and women who come here and work hard for themselves and their families. your success and hard work helps you and your family, but also, america. i salute you, i appreciate the work you're doing and if i'm president of the united states, i will do everything in my power to make sure you keep jobs and good wages. >> you mean, shrum, this is an opportunity for sheer sahr kazuo m. he's thanking the coal miners, the most dangerous job, then you
2:11 pm
go another couple of miles and then go to work all day in the dark. he's thanking them for doing that. he says thank you for your service? are they working for him? is he the owner? a friend of the owner's? thank you for working for me. it is so weird, i'm sorry, to be thanking people for being coal miners. his inability to connect to these people is so obvious. >> he naturally doesn't connect. the the same thing happened with john mccain and sarah palin and when palin wasn't campaigning with him, mccain went back to being pretty flat on the campaign trail. >> but mccain's a recognizable human being. there's a difference. he has a temper. he has a sense of humor. he's a human being. he's not an android. >> if you're telling me that mitt is animatronic, i've been
2:12 pm
saying that for a long time. >> these big animals move around. >> no, it's the lincoln as disneyland who used to stand up and deliver the gettysburg address. >> it doesn't seem to be working singly. >> it is clear romney gets a lot of energy off of ryan and you saw that on the rollout and without that kind of push and that kind of energy, yeah, he reverts back to what he's comfortable with doing. you know, ryan really elevates the game a little bit and so, i think you'll probably hopefully will see the two of them more together than we may have seen presidential and vice presidential candidates. >> can he go to a presidential debate and bring ryan with him when he has to debate obama? >> i think he's going to want to ditch ryan before the debate. >> i think it's about the conservative movement saying after this election if things work out in obama's favor, we ran the wrong guy at the top. we'll get it right next time. in a way, the weird thing in the election so far is that romney may have touted the other guy as the next president of the united states and it's going to turn out he will be the guy to run in a couple of years.
2:13 pm
thank you. coming up, hey, big spender. paul ryan voted by the way, for expending medicare for both wars, for the auto bailout, t.a.r.p. without paying for any of it. nothing. and his budget's not going to bounce for 1,000 years, apparently. so how do you calm a deficit hawk? if they're playing for medicare is such a big deal, why wait ten years? sneak it past the older voters today so the later voters will get stuck with it. we should have it with real people. also, remember president obama's executive order providing a two-year amnesty for people brought up in the united states illegally, but they've grown up as americans? it goes into effect tomorrow. it's going to have a big impact for latino voters. and the president chided romney
2:14 pm
today on his infamous decision to drive up to canada with the dog tied to the roof. he's coming up in the "side show." down here, folks measure commitment by what's getting done. the twenty billion dollars bp committed has helped fund economic and environmental recovery. long-term, bp's made a five hundred million dollar commitment to support scientists studying the environment. and the gulf is open for business - the beaches are beautiful, the seafood is delicious. last year, many areas even reported record tourism seasons.
2:15 pm
the progress continues... but that doesn't mean our job is done. we're still committed to seeing this through. republicans have voted in voter i.d. laws in many states to prevent voter fraud. democrats argue it's a cover for suppressing the democratic vote. now, a reporting project has look eed at more than 2,000 cas of fraud over the last ten years. how many of voter impersonation did they find? ten. do the math, it comes down to one case for every 15 million voters. we'll be right back. switch to allstate. their claim service is so good, now it's guaranteed. [ normal voice ] so i can trust 'em. unlike randy. are you in good hands?
2:16 pm
2:17 pm
while ryan's pick frightens some republican party leaders already and insiders as well and has invigorated tea partiers and fiscal conservatives who see him
2:18 pm
as a deficit fighting comrade. only one problem with that theory. a look at his 14-year congressional record. and he's not an outsider. he was often willing to vote for expensive government programs without worrying to pay for a nickel of it. he voted thr for the $70 billion bank bailout, auto bailout, the wars in iraq and afghanistan and for bush's prescription drug benefit. he backed the 2005 highway, included the bridge to nowhere. also for no child left behind and none of that was paid for. he voted for everything under w. and that doesn't sound like the record of a deficit hawk, so what is paul ryan's really governing philosophy? michael crawley and john nicholls, john, i want you to start on this thing. what can you expect from paul
2:19 pm
ryan to the extent he has influence and i expect he'll have a lot with romney. what will he do when he gets power back based on what he's done with power before? >> well, he's actually got a governing philosophy and it's pretty clear. it's the 1920s big house on the hill republican. he believes that the roll of government is to intervene when rich guys have a problem or when there's a war that needs to be fought and the funny thing about him is that paul ryan has a reputation. he's built it up carefully over a long period of time as a republican who really is deep into the numbers, deep into the reality of budget, but his default position when ever a big issue comes into play, is basically what is the the u.s. chamber of commerce say? what does the business community say as regard to what it needs? frankly, if it says it needs an auto bailout or bank bailout or if the pharmaceutical companies want a structuring of medicare
2:20 pm
that gives them a lot more money, he votes for it. >> so, this is more, let me go to you, michael. it sounds more like the petroleum club in tulsa or in salt lake, one of the establishments where men get together and call the shots. all rich business guys. is this what he is? just a chamber guy? doesn't sound like a tea party guy especially to me either. >> i think another way to look at it is his background. he was sort of tutored by jack kemp. the supply side economics of the republican party. >> but jack kemp never cut the poor people. >> well, right. but i think that part of what is fundamental to ryan's vision, i don't know so much object how kemp would have done it sh but supply side economics, you cut taxes at the top. i guess you know, theoretically, cut them across the board, but there seems to be an emphasis on tax rates at the top and according to this theory, that
2:21 pm
increases tax revenue. i don't think there's a ton of evidence for that. >> this is really important to our viewers, to me. how can you justify making a guy who works in the mines, like romney cheering these guys, scary enough to go into the mines. they're real workers. every buck they make i'm sure is well earneded and charge them a higher tax rate. in fact, don't tax at all the people who live off money, but just sit on a pile of money, but don't have to pay taxes on the dividends or profits or the capital gains because this guy, paul ryan, thinks rich people shouldn't have to pay taxes on money they make off their riches. >> it's a really tough sell. i think you have to make the argument, it's hard to make, which is that you have to unleash economic growth and you know, remove the burden of government from the job creators. >> why is someone sitting on a bunch of money a job creator?
2:22 pm
not even working? why is capital gains a job -- back to john on this. how does that help stimulate the economy more than that guy working in the mines digging up coal or whatever? >> well of course it doesn't and so many of these theorys that paul ryan buys into and he's a big, big fan of austrian economists from 30 years ago, 40 years ago. many of the theorys he buys into have been proven not to work and one of the problems that he's got and i've known paul for a long time, is that he's fascinated by economic theory, some of which are 100 years old, when you didn't have globalization and you could make the rich guy rich and eventually, he might through a little of the money around. today, when you make the rich
2:23 pm
guy rich, he puts his must be in a tax haven overseas and if he has extra, he opens a factory in china. >> is this guy a fiscal hawk or does he simply spend money at liberty when he likes the project? whether it's prescription drug, t.a.r.p. of bailout of rich people, bailout of corporations or banks. it seems like ryan only starteded worrying about paying for things since obama's been elected president. under p., he didn't worry about the price tag. what do we make of that, michael? just a simple hypocrisy of a guy who will spend any nickel as long as it's designated spending, but the minute obama shows up, no deal. >> i think the second piece of this, there's a supply side philosophy then a conservative reform. he's really interested in cutting back what he sees is not the core of government functions, safety and security, so anything that's welfare, state, that might be seen as a handout or creating dependsy, you know, he puts a higher
2:24 pm
priority on slashing those things. and so he's a reformer. but you know, there are plenty of cases, you're absolutely right, when he was given a choice, the deficit was not his first choice. i don't think the deficit is his overriding priority. he's a supply cider and he's cast a bunch of votes that kind of made sense for a congressional republican making his way through the system, but it's not the case that the deficit has been his first priority throughout his career. >> seems like he only started worrying about paying for things under obama. let me ask you about this thing, i think he represents the conflict in american government. people hate the word socialism, but here he is running for things like the bailout, the bank bailout, the auto bailout, all these wars we spend money on. creating a medicare prescription bill. they do all this because it's what people want. they want to fight these wars, what they see as our enemies and
2:25 pm
appropriately so. they want to have prescription drugs because that's the main cost and people want that help. but yet they give lip service to iran and we don't need help from the government. isn't he the walking, talking conflict person? who wants to take that one? zblil take a shot. >> paul ryan came out of the mainstream of republican politics, this is a guy whose dad former law partner got him a job in the senate in 1992 with bob caston, who was on the banking committee. he went out to washington and learned his way around the city. he is a political operative. he is not a conservative in any kind of classic sense. he didn't come out through conservative activism. he came up through sort of the core of the business republican party and i think that's the best way to understand him.
2:26 pm
he is a smart guy. likes to read economics books, but he's not an economist and he also isn't somebody who's really going to steer this country in some sort of new or different direction, except that when he has to make choices and this is the place people aubt to be troubled on, if it is about giving a rich guy a tax break haves giving a working woman a tax break or a little bit of food stamps or something like that, he will heir on the side of the rich guy and this is a pattern that comes again and again. >> he likes to do them both at once. supply side economics plus government reform to reduce dependency. >> really an act of courage to make everybody happy. thank you. i love that name. up next, president obama jumps on the dog on the roof band wagon. the president takes on poor
2:27 pm
shamus one more time. this is "hardball." place for politics. erarpao ue m
2:28 pm
i aytiba iat mo .d enthrot s
2:29 pm
wanted to provide better employee benefits while balancing the company's bottom line, their very first word was... [ to the tune of "lullaby and good night" ] ♪ af-lac ♪ aflac [ male announcer ] find out more at... [ duck ] aflac! [ male announcer ] ...forbusiness.com. [ yawning sound ] [ male announcer ] ...forbusiness.com. hgotta start the day off right. wardrobe. cute. then new activia breakfast blend. a great way to help start the day. mmm... creamy lowfat yogurt with grains in yummy breakfast flavors, like apple cinnamon. its hearty, with twice the protein of regular lowfat yogurt and helps regulate your digestive system. our morning routines are important, aren't they? new activia breakfast blend.
2:30 pm
in college, paul ryan, one of his jobs was, he drove the oscar meier wienermobile. you know what i'm talking about. he and romney have something in common. both have the experience of driving a car with a dog on the roof. never get enough of that. >> any way. letterman's not the only one still needling mitt romney over the shamus on the roof incident. here's president obama. >> he said that new sources of energy like wind are imaginary. governor romney even explained his energy policy this way. i'm quoting here. you can drive a car with a
2:31 pm
windmill on it. that's what he said about wind power. you can't drive a car with a windmill on it. now, i -- i don't know if he's actually tried that. i know he's had other things on his car. >> like the giggle he gets before he knows the joke's coming. that came early today as part f the president's spin through iowa. doesn't it seem like one word's dominating the back and forth over the pick? bold, perhaps. >> governor romney's selection is terrific. >> still proud of my running mate. in this case, it is also a bold choice. >> there's a boldness to this decision. >> this was a big, bold, courageous choice. >> the american people have already had a glimpse of the ryan republican congressional budget. it's bold. it's bold, but i don't get, i mean this sincerely now. i don't get what's gutsy about
2:32 pm
giving millionaires about tax break. >> he's a big, bold choice because it really does say something about mitt romney. he's picking someone who has a budget plan under which mitt romney would pay less than 1% in taxes. >> works both ways, but what makes the pick such a bold move? >> romney ryan 2012. very excited. yes. mitt romney picked wisconsin congressman, paul ryan, and folks, this was no safe choice. bold. bold. i mean, so daring. i mean, white, christian and male? that's a triple not threatening to me and of course, like all republican vp picks, he looks exactly like tina fey.
2:33 pm
>> isn't that the name of a laundry detergent? finally, president obama is the subject of an optical illusion tonight. take a look at this snapshot from a speech in iowa yesterday. is he looking into the future with some kind of glowing orb? finally, dompd donald trump -- he's an alien. up next, who needs to be convinced about the paul ryan budget? mitt romney. you're watching "hardball." place for politics. [ female announcer ] how do you define your moment?
2:34 pm
the blissful pause just before that rich sweetness touches your lips. the delightful discovery, the mid-sweetening realization that you have the house all to yourself. well, almost. the sweet reward, making a delicious choice that's also a smart choice. splenda no-calorie sweetener. with the original sugar-like taste you love and trust. splenda makes the moment yours.
2:35 pm
how do you know which ones to follow? the equity summary score consolidates the ratings of up to 10 independent research providers into a single score that's weighted
2:36 pm
based on how accurate they've been in the past. i'm howard spielberg of fidelity investments. the equity summary score is one more innovative reason serious investors are choosing fidelity. get 200 free trades today and explore your next investing idea. i'm jon fortt. let's take a look at where stocks closed out the day. the dow up three points, the nasdaq down six to 3017 and s&p lower. that means the day ended flat. now back to "hardball."
2:37 pm
>> you said earlier this year, paul ryan's -- absolutely right on. so i'm curious, is there anything about it you disagree -- >> well, the items we agree on i think outweigh any differences. we haven't gone through piece by piece and said oh, here's a place where there's a difference. i can't imagine any two people even in the same party who have the same positions on all issues. >> the biggest risk a vague candidate like romney faces in picking a fire brand like paul ryan is that all the gaps in romn romney's plans will be filled in with ryan's details. and let alone his medicare plan,
2:38 pm
but romney -- aligned himself with the ryan brand, but not specifics? can he get away with it? ezra klein is a msnbc political analyst -- david, i want you to do something nobody's been able to do in the last couple of days. clearly delineate, what would president obama do, what has he done under his health care act to medicare in terms of cuts and spending. what would ryan do and romney do? can you delineate among the three, so that people now on medicare will be seeing what their choice is? >> how much time do we have? >> you can do it quickly. so, what obama does is he keeps medicare broadly as it has been, but makes important changes to it. it remains a single payer system. if you're over 65, the government pays for your health insurance. but he makes some cuts to it. those cuts are focused on some of these payments that go to private insurers and in coming years, they include changes to
2:39 pm
that medicare tried to do a little bit less of paying for quantity of health care and more of paying for quality of health care. there are health experts to which the plan did more. there are those who see it as on the way to death panels. >> the obama plan. the white house, basically are saying no commitment to any recipient, someone over 65, nobody's going to get hurt. is that fair? >> well, i don't know whether that's fair. anytime you change a program, it has the poesh l to be potential to be better or worse. there may be things in the future that medicare doesn't pay for. on the other hand, there may be some things it now pays for that people like and may not be quite as generous in the future. >> what would ryan do? >> so, i think we can put ryan and romney broadly in the same place and say what they would do is move this to a different kind of system. whether you call it voucher of
2:40 pm
premium support. instead of the government covering the bill, whatever it is, they would send money to individuals and they could then go buy a health insurance plan, whether on the private market or still from the government, still medicare, and they can do that. the big uncertain questions about that with run, will over the long-term, introduce more competition to the system and reduce costs as romney and ryan claim it wl will or fail to do that and as a result, will people herbally be left with a health insurance benefit that is significantly less generous than medicare now is. i think most experts think the more likely case is the latter. >> okay, let me go to ezra now. we assume it's goin to be tougher on the seniors if you go with the ryan romney plan. but if obama's cutting some of the money going to insurance companies, it looks to me that ryan and romney both are offering up a big piece of the
2:41 pm
pie to the insurance companies. instead of people paying into medicare, which goes to the government, they're going to be giving money, a portion of their money to the insurance company. this is great for them. >> if you're a private insurance company, you would really like to move to a premium support system. what obama does, he takes money away from this medicare advantage program. these are these private insurers brought into the system to offer cheaper options. they're ratcheting that 20% back. what's interesting is ryan kept those cut, so every dollar of cuts over the next ten years that obama made in the health care bill, ryan kept them in the budget and every republican in the house voted for them and every republican in the senate voted for them. romney says he wouldn't allow that. he is saying on the one hand, he wants credit for being the guy who will make the tough decisions on medicare.
2:42 pm
unlike every republican in the house and senate and barack obama and the democrats, he wouldn't allow for even a dollar in cuts to medicare over the next decade. doesn't make you think he can make tough decisions on budgets. >> for the viewer out there who cares about this personally, he basically says i'll see the cuts obama talked about and add to them by shrinking this into a voucher program. >> romney over the next ten years, says he will not allow any of the cuts agreed on and this his reforms will begin ten year frs the date he passes the budget. he's trying to play a little game here, right? it will just be those folks coming after you who will get hit. whether or not that makes this likely to go into effect or not is a more open question. >> if you're 60 years old, what's the smart move? ryan, romney or obama? i don't tell people how to vote. >> no, in terms of policy.
2:43 pm
>> people have to make judgment calls on where they think federal dollars should go. medicare's on the same path spending wise under obama and ryan. it will grow gdp plus 0.5%. obama tries to make that work by changing things on the provider and payment side. ryan does it by moving to a voucher program. if you're voting on medicare in the direction you think will be more effective. >> take a look at this romney campaign ad. it's the new tv ad attacking the president on medicare coming from romney's side. >> you paid into medicare for years. every paycheck. now when you need it, obama has cut $716 billion from medicare. why? to pay for obama care. so now the money you paid for your guaranteed health care is is going to a massive new government program that's not for you. the romney ryan plan protects medicare benefits for today's seniors and strengthens the plan for the next generation. >> again, the obama campaign had
2:44 pm
a response to that. the saving his ad attacks do not cut a single guaranteed medicare benefit and mitt romney embraced the same savings when he promised he would sign paul ryan's budget. david here. there we go back to the shell game that goes on here, where by paul ryan assumes the cut that is obama recommended in his affordable act bill, in fact, carried and signed. and yet, he says i wouldn't go that route. and back to the question of is it really going to work? the obama plan, to basically force the savings to the providers and not effect theo the recipients. >> if we were to try to boil this down i think what we would say is that obama for better or worse, has more modest changes or cuts to medicare. he has some. the republican plan has much more.
2:45 pm
so the question is how much change to medicare do you want? modest changes, obama's plan. or more radical changes because you're more worried about the fiscal sustainability of medicare. we're not hearing that debate because basically, neither side wants to. they want credit for being bold on the deficit. but they don't want credit for actually doing the things you need to do to cut the deficit, which is cut spending. >> i think david put it right and the way to think about this in the long-term, what happens if their first plan doesn't work. in the ryan plan, if it doesn't work, the cost gets shifted on to the patient. you pay the difference for what you need for a reasonable plan and cheapest plan. in the obama world, it gets shifted on to providers who pay hospitals and drug companies, less money. that is a fundamental difference. >> providers that get cut under
2:46 pm
obama. thank you, dave and ezra klein. up next, why tomorrow may be the day president obama wraps up the latino vote. we've got a big story that has not been covered well. we're going to cover it pretty well right now. this is "hardball." the place for politics.
2:47 pm
michelle obama has been waging a war against obesity. number five on the list of obese
2:48 pm
states, michigan, obesity rate of more than 33% of people are obese. after that, alabama. four, west virginia weighs in at the state with the third highest rate. the first runner up is louisiana and the state that tops the list is mississippi with an obesity rate of about 35%. four of those five states voted republican in 2008. whatever that means and about 80% of the top 15 states are red states, so red states are somewhat larger than blue states. we'll be right back. whatever that means. down here, folks measure commitment by what's getting done. the twenty billion dollars bp committed has helped fund economic and environmental recovery.
2:49 pm
long-term, bp's made a five hundred million dollar commitment to support scientists studying the environment. and the gulf is open for business - the beaches are beautiful, the seafood is delicious. last year, many areas even reported record tourism seasons. the progress continues... but that doesn't mean our job is done. we're still committed to seeing this through. you'll inevitably find yourself on a desolate highway in your jeep grand cherokee. and when you do, you'll be grateful for the adaptive cruise control that automatically adjusts your speed when approaching slower traffic. and for the blind spot monitoring that helps remind you that the highway might not be as desolate... ...as you thought. ♪
2:50 pm
we are back.
2:51 pm
when congress failed to pass the dream act, president obama issued his own executive order to temporarily allow young illegal immigrants to live openly in the united states. tomorrow his plan dubbed deferred action for childhood arrivals takes effect. over 1.5 million people can apply for two-year reprieve from deportation and for work permits positively. and those eligible include undocumented i am grants between the ages of 15 and 30 who arrived in the u.s. before their 16th birthday. they must have lived in the u.s. for five consecutive years, including june 15 of this year, and the program was announced. applicants must be students and high school graduates or honorably discharge members of the military. thank you. we only have a little time. this is a big story in the latino community. what's this mean to people who may know hispanic people and may know teenage people? living in -- may suspect them out here legally?
2:52 pm
>> this has been huge, chris, huge. as of tomorrow, people got to this country through no fault of their own, before they were 16 years of age, less than 30 years of age right now, and have been here for more than four, five years, can apply even though they don't appear on i.c.e. or government's radar screen of them being undocumented, they can come out and say yes, i fall within these guidelines. and they will get a would-year reprieve from any kind of government harassment. >> this is done by pure executive order. >> it took two years between the -- >> how can the president do something like this? >> he said for a year he couldn't. >> legally now -- attorney general says he can. >> some in the -- house republicans say he can't but as of tomorrow, there may be 1.8 million young dhads will have an thaunt hadn-- hadn't had an opportunity before. >> this is about mobilization. we are pumping up the enthusiasm in the latino electorate. earlier this year over half of latinos said they weren't feeling that enthusiastic about the election. especially in comparison to
2:53 pm
2008. just days after this decree was put into effect, we saw that latinos jumped, over 50% now say that they are more enthused about voting for the president. the president needs latinos to turn out. he doesn't have a problem with their favorability. he needs them to come out of the polls in november. >> you are cuban american. let me ask you about not picking rubio or -- he has this -- he will put romney in the nomination. is that enough, does that show respect? >> that's a good question. for the south florida folks, cuban american votes, south florida, it is because they see it as a young rubio, young man. just starting out his political career on national level and getting a big spotlight. >> that's what kennedy got in '56. >> there's the i-4 corridor. lot of voters throughout the state that are latino and aren't cuban american and see thing and is saying you know what, you
2:54 pm
just don know how much marco rubio brought to florida on an actual -- >> what happen it is he speaks a little -- really fluent spanish? george w. or anglo trying to learn spanish or a guy that speaks it as mother tongue, will that brab people across the country are latino? >> absolutely not. >> no n, absolutely not? >> no. we immediate substance. we don't need pop and style. we need substance. >> you are tough. >> i'm just saying -- >> somebody spoke my language and i grew newspaper this country and didn't speak english or spoke it as a second language, i'm hearing my heart talk, it would affect me. >> chris, if you can speak spanish and at the same time not put forward draconian immigration policies, that's the winning combination. you can't have just a style by itself. if you bring -- he brings on the policy then so be it. what i want to say is keep your eye on iowa, virginia, and north carolina. these are states you don't think of as having a latino impact. but they can. they have two 2% to 3% latinos in there.
2:55 pm
latinos can make the difference in the states. >> if they vote. thank you very much. thank you. thank you very much, victoria. when we return let me fin wish this. does mitt romney want this job? does he want go for it? does he like what he is doing? he doesn't seem to like it except when he was with ryan. ryan seems to like it. i don't get it. this is a strange character. not evil or anything but odd. there's something odd about the guy. i don't know what it is. right back. o do. you do what you do... because it matters. at hp we don't just believe in the power of technology. we believe in the power of people when technology works for you. to dream. to create. to work. if you're going to do something. make it matter.
2:56 pm
2:57 pm
2:58 pm
2:59 pm
let me fin wish this. i don't know about this guy, romney. i'm not sure he likes this new business of his. he likes working at bain. people say they liked him there. he was happy, making big money. making it fast. he liked that. he doesn't seem to like this new business. this wanting to be president business. he wants to be president, for sure. s it is the getting there he doesn't like. politics sure to come should he win. we know one thing and didn't learn it recently. politics doesn't end when someone reach it is white house. barack obama could use more political ability than he has shown dealing with the congress, getting them to do what he wants. what's this with romney? the minute he got separated from paul ryan this weekend, he went dead again, dull. is he doing this for love? is he politician because he loves what he is fighting for and believes the country needs? is he devoted to the solutions he is offering? is he? does he just want the title of president? wants the position? presidents like the job