in washington, senator merkley. thank you for coming on tonight, i really appreciate it. all right, i like that. that was good. we should talk again in the future about expanding social security. new america foundation has -- you're grimacing. >> i'm not antientitlement program. >> they explain it, we're going to talk about that some future show. for now, that's it for "all in" this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts now. good evening, rachel. >> i like it where you left it, this is how it's going to be, you don't do it, you don't do it. >> all in an hour's work. thanks to you at home, as well, for joining us this hour. happy wednesday, a wednesday in which i must give you fair warning. we're trying tonight to put a ten-pound show into a five-pound bag. there's a lot going on in the world. big immigration protests in washington today and in 18 other states. really big coordinated marches and rallies calling for immigration reform as a bipartisan group of senators suggests that there, in fact, might be a path to start moving

forward on immigration reform as early as next week. president obama releasing his budget today. i'm not sure if it's connected, but right now at the white house as we speak, the president is hosting a dinner with a dozen republican senators. the republican party chairman responded to the dinner tonight by saying he was outraged that the president is taking senators out to fancy dinners at restaurants. no one apparently told the chairman this dinner was not at a restaurant, it was at the white house, but still, he's outraged. today in the states, it was a big day for republican big government social conservatism. alabama's governor has signed a trap law, it's designed to shut down all the abortion clinics in alabama. meanwhile in virginia today, the attorney general there has been shot down by a federal appeals court in his fighting to uphold

his state's mandate it be peno-vaginal intercourse only in the state of virginia. nothing else. in virginia, it is apparently a fight to the death as long as republican a.g. and gubernatorial candidate ken cuchienelli has anything to say about it. he's demanding exxon's answers and documents about what went wrong with that pipeline spill today. there's a lot going on, a lot of moving parts in today's news. but we start tonight in louisiana. we start in the courtroom of this local district court judge. his courtroom a couple of weeks ago a case arose that involved a convicted felon, a young man who was a convicted burglar found riding in a car with a loaded 40-caliber smith and west son handgun on the back seat, also an ak-47 with a magazine in the trunk of the car. this guy is in the car with

those guns and he's a felon. convicted felons are not supposed to have guns, but when this young man's case came up in court last month, the young man, the burglar with the ak-47 and .40-caliber handgun was not contesting the facts of the case, was not denying he was a convicted felon or was in the car with those guns, what he was contesting in court last month was the very idea that it can be illegal for a convicted felon to have a gun. and he won his case. louisiana, like every state in the union, says, yes, we respect the second amendment, there is a right to keep and bear arms, but it's not without any limits at all. perhaps the lowest common denominator we can all agree on is convicted violent felons are not allowed to have guns, right? louisiana and every other state in the country all ban violent felons from having guns, but in louisiana, that ban on felons getting guns was declared unconstitutional by that local

trial court judge last month. that's because of a new law that the nra supported in louisiana last year. a new law that singles out gun laws and gun regulations for special scrutiny by the courts. essentially, gun laws in louisiana now are presumed to be unconstitutional unless proven otherwise. including the one about felons. when the law was first proposed, the bureau of governmental research, which is kind of like the congressional research service at the state level, they do nonpartisan review of legislation and policy for the state of louisiana, this nonpartisan analysts in this state said don't do this thing the nra wants us to do. they urged people to vote against this change in the law. they said, there's no good reason to enter this uncharted territory. they said, changing the law like this, quote, would expose the public to unnecessary risks and hamper law enforcement. republican governor bobby jind l, though, supported it.

he said, it's time we protected our freedom. now that it turns out that what he was protecting was the ability of convicted felons to legally possess ak-47s, governor bobby gindle put out a statement, quote, we disagree with the judge's ruling. he never thought this law he was joining with the nra to support would protect laws from felons owning guns, but it does. now thanks to the legislation you let the nra write for your state, the convicted felon who was in jail because he was found to be in possession with an ak-47 and handgun has been sprung from jail, and when the state supreme court hears the case soon, the people who warned against this nra law in the first place are warning one of the possible outcomes at the supreme court would be the law banning felons from having guns won't just be struck down

permanently, it will be struck down retroactively, which would result in a mandatory springing from prison every convicted felon who's in jail in louisiana right now because he was a felon illegally in possession of a gun. that won't be able to be illegal anymore thanks to what the nra tricked bobby jind l into supporting, even though he swears he didn't understand it would work out like this. louisiana is the first state to enact this thing the nra wrote for them, but they also convinced republicans in seven other states, minnesota, missouri, alabama, iowa, illinois, oklahoma, and south dakota. so, what do you think, minnesota, you ready for the nra to force you to let out of prison all of your felons who were caught with ak-47s? you sure you understand what you're getting into here? louisiana is a case study for what happens when you let the nra write your gun laws. turns out it's not a great idea. i mean, it would be one thing if bobby jind l and the rest of

them intended to give guns to all the convicts in the state of louisiana, but they apparently did not intend to do that, and they are shocked to find out that's what they got when they did what the nra told them to do. louisiana is a case study for what goes wrong when you let the nra be in charge of this part of public policy. and at the federal level, we are now, today, deciding if we want to keep letting the nra be in charge of this part of public policy. under the nra's leadership, after all, we have built a national policy system in this area in which if you are on the terrorist watch list, you can't fly on a plane, but you can buy an ar-15 assault rifle and 100-round drum magazine while you're on the terrorist watch list. our system now is a system in which if you are adjudicated mentally ill, if you try to buy a gun here in a store like this, they will run a background check on you that should show you have been adjudicated mentally ill and you will not be allowed to

buy a gun in that store. but if you want to buy the same gun here at a gun show instead of a gun store, if you've been adjudicated mentally ill and you want to buy a gun at a gun show, feel free, go ahead, go nuts. oh, yeah, you are already. in the very, very, very, very cautious baby steps consensus legislation unveiled today in washington by senators in both parties, everybody fell all over themselves to say the nra was okay with this, nra lifetime senator joe manchin announcing the nra would be neutral on the background checks legislation he put forth today with republican senator pat toomey. the offices of the senator saying the nra was in the room watching over the negotiations on that legislation every step of the way. the other bipartisan legislation released on gun trafficking today from senators pat leahy and susan collins also announced

today as having been agreed upon with the nra. and while the nra itself is maintaining its same old publicly hostile stance, even to the measures they were said to be involved with, hopes to the passage of the very modest reforms, hope for those passing rests now on the hope that these guys have had their rings kissed enough in the development of this legislation, that even though they are publicly hostile, they might not rear up to their full height in fighting these bills, and, therefore, maybe something might be able to be passed. and that is one way to think about this, one way to think about the power, right. the other way is to look up from the late '90s and look around and realize the nra isn't the only game in town anymore. >> and as i visited with the family at the funeral, i couldn't get over how familiar they felt to me, because what i realized was hadiya's family is just like my family, hadiya

pendleton was me, and i was her when i met with hadiya pendleton's classmates on the day of her funeral. dozens of them later spoke at the service, each referring to her as my best friend. and let me tell you, oh, it is hard to know what to say to a room full of teenagers who are about to bury their best friend. but i started by telling them that hadiya was clearly on her way to doing something truly worthy with her life. i told them that there is a reason that we're here on this earth, that each of us has a mission in this world, and i urge them to use their lives to give meaning to hadiya's life. >> hadiya pendleton was 15 years old when she was shot and killed

in chicago in january, just one week after she performed at the president's inauguration in d.c. after that emotional speech today in chicago, first lady michelle obama then went to harper high school in the englewood neighbor of chicago, where just last year, in one year, 29 students at that high school were shot. michelle obama is a very popular first lady. but she has not made a habit of using that popularity to weigh in on a lot of contentious policy debates in washington. she has her causes. she's not frequently weighed in on stuff that is being debated before congress, but today she did. also today, the group moms demand action for gun sense in america released this new ad. ♪ >> 911, what's your emergency? >> there's a man with a gun. [ gun shot ] >> bloodied children ran out of the school as shots were being fired. >> shocked and saddened by the

news of the shootings at virginia tech today. >> what does it take to see what is unfolding before our eyes. >> they had their entire life ahead of them. >> my child is gone. ♪ >> my little girl was so full of life, isn't coming home. >> that ad out today from a new gun reform group that was formed after newtown that's called "moms demand action." also today, members of the coalition to stop gun violence in washington today read the names of the more than 3,300 americans who have been killed by guns since the newtown massacre in december. family members of the victims of sandy hook were among those who stood up to read names. at one point, one woman reminded the crowd they had been reading names for more than 20 minutes and they were barely through one day's worth of victims. also today, americans for responsible solutions, which is

the gun reform group formed by gabby giffords and mark kelly released support for the bill put forth today, and it was a statement of support, but it ended with a warning that this group would communicate directly with the constituents of senators if they try to block debate on the bill. when gabby giffords and mark kelly formed the group back in january, they did it with the expressed purpose of taking on the nra, that was their reason, they said, for existing. now they are issuing warnings to lawmakers who do the gun lobby's bidding. the families of the kids and educators who died in the newtown massacre were also back on capitol hill today in person for a second day meeting with lawmakers. when, after meeting with the families today, senator joe manchin, who you see in this room, was asked how the families have impacted this debate, senator manchin got very emotional, was unable to answer, all he could say is i'm a parent, i'm a grandparent.

in the debate over gun laws in this country, the professional gun lobby is no longer the only side. certainly, not the only side that has the energy and resolve to push hard and relentlessly for what it wants. there is another big, strong side in this fight now, and they are organized and they want results, and they are pushing for those results, and, i think it matters they have an outspoken ally in this white house. they have been told all along that even getting a vote on these issues would be impossible. well, the vote's tomorrow. they said it couldn't be done. joining us now is u.s. senator chris murphy of connecticut. thank you so much for your time tonight. i really appreciate it. >> thanks for having me. >> so, the big news yesterday was the republicans' filibuster threat seems to be defeated. there will be a vote. big news today was about the bill on expanding background checks. what do you think is the most important thing to know about that deal? >> well, i think it's important to note that republicans and democrats, like they did in connecticut, are coming

together. i mean, you know, pat toomey is not someone you'd necessarily expect to buck the nra, but he has read the writing on the wall here, 90% of americans, 90% of pennsylvania voters, support universal background checks, and i think, frankly, thoughtful republicans have figured out that aside from policy considerations, politically, they just cannot sit on the line and stop a piece of legislation that's supported by 90% of americans from becoming law. now, the nra has come out today and said not only are they going to oppose this, but they are going to score it. normally, that's signalled the death nail for pieces of legislation on the floor of the house and senate. but with 90% of americans frankly supporting something stronger than what they came up with, the question next week is going to be who runs the united states senate, do the people really run this place or does the nra run it, because 9 out of 10 people should probably be able to get something done here. the nra is going to put their

reputation, their mythology on the line, i think this time they are going to lose. >> what do you make of the effort and the forces lined up on the other side of the debate from the nra here? obviously, the families who are the family members of the victims of the newtown massacre in your state are the most potent emotional core of the other side of the nra in this debate, but there's mayors against illegal guns and the group against gun violence and the new moms group that formed after newtown and the gabby giffords and mark kelly effort, the brady campaign, who's been there for so long, this connecticut congressional delegate. how do you assess your own strength being on this side of the fight? >> well, it matters in two respects, one, these families who are down here this week, i'm in awe of them. they are in the middle of grieving and they are coming down to lobby in washington. nobody can make the case better than they can. remember, five kids escaped. five kids escaped while adam

lanza switched cartridges, and the argument that they are making is that if lanza had to switch cartridges ten times or 15 times instead of just five or six times, their kids might have escaped as well. there's nobody that can make that argument, it's a real policy argument, better than those families. second, the secret is out, the nra hasn't been doing well in elections. in 2012, they spent money in 16 u.s. senate races and they lost 13 of them, and that's even without bloomberg and giffords groups spending money in these races. so you add on top of the already bad record of the nra recently in elections, this new wave of money to support people who take them on, and i just think this is a new day. i could be proven wrong. 20 years has gone by since we passed serious gun legislation, but i think this is significant. >> senator chris murphy, democrat of connecticut. it's been a real pleasure to

talk to you over the course of this as we've seen it evolve. i think you've been astute in being able to explain what's important about the ongoing debate. i hope you stay in touch with us. good luck. >> thanks, rachel. >> thanks very much. a lot still ahead tonight, including elizabeth warn, david axelrod is here tonight, plus, important news about a french zoo. it's all ahead. setting the barh by going low. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 like offering schwab etfs tdd# 1-800-345-2550 with the lowest operating expenses tdd# 1-800-345-2550 in their respective lipper categories -- tdd# 1-800-345-2550 lower than ishares tdd# 1-800-345-2550 and vanguard. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 and with all our etfs commission-free tdd# 1-800-345-2550 when traded online in a schwab account, tdd# 1-800-345-2550 it leaves our investors with more money to invest. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 something they've come to count on with us. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 so as investors continue to set their portfolio goals high, tdd# 1-800-345-2550 we help keep their costs of investing low. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 give us a call and open an account today. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 carefully consider prospectus information, including tdd# 1-800-345-2550 investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 request a prospectus by calling schwab at 800-435-4000. tdd# 1-800-345-2550

read it carefully before investing. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 fees and expenses apply. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 investing involves risks, including loss of principal. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 as well as they could because they don't take it with food. switch to citracal maximum plus d. it's the only calcium supplement that can be taken with or without food. my doctor recommends citracal maximum.

[ dog ] you know, i just don't think i should have to wait for it! who do you think i am, quicken loans? ♪ at quicken loans, we won't make you wait for it. our efficient, online system allows us to get you through your home loan process fast. which means you'll never have to beg for a quick closing. one more way quicken loans is engineered to amaze. bonkers, look at me when i'm talking to you.

♪ it's about where you're going. the new ram 1500. best-in-class 25 mpg. ♪ north american truck of the year. ♪ the truck of texas. better residual value than ford and chevy. it's the fastest-growing truck brand in america. guts. glory. ram. only three weeks ago the

chairman of the republican party called a big press conference in d.c. to release his party's autopsy of what went wrong for them in 2012. >> i didn't need the report to tell me that we have to do a lot better job and do a lot more to make up ground in minority communities. we're launching a new national field program designed to engage minority groups and communities at the local level. >> the day after party chairman priebus's big let's reach out to minority press conference, the very next day, a republican took him up on it. republican senator rand paul from the great state of kentucky took a trip to the hispanic chamber of commerce. senator paul's argument for why hispanic should vote republican hinged on an argument that hispanics, obviously, agree with republicans on social conservative issues. everybody knows, he said, that hispanics are wildly opposed to abortion rights and wielgdly

opposed to same-sex marriage. that may be senator rand paul's view of what hispanics belief, it is not, in fact, the truth. he then transitioned from the stereotype part of the program to this part of the program. >> there's a hilarious episode on "seinfeld," any fans? where jerry admits that he loves asian women, but he frets and worries, he said, is it racist to like a certain race? >> don't do it, don't do it, just don't. >> so, it is with trepidation that i'd like to express my admiration today for the romance of the latin culture. [ laughter ] >> back to the drawing board, priebus! he could not have known that the day right after his let's reach out to minorities press conference, rand paul would be the one republican who would give it a go. turns off today senator rand

paul ventured to howard university, the prestigious historically black college in washington, d.c., and his pitch to the howard university students there was, essentially, they would want to vote republican if only they understood more about black history f they only understood black history as well as he did. >> i mean, how many of you would have, if i would have said who do you think the founders of the naacp are, do you think they are republicans or democrats, would everybody here know they are all republicans? all right, all right, you know more than i know. okay. i don't mean that to be insulting. i don't know what you know. i'm trying to find out what the connection is. >> turns out quizzing the audience at howard university about the history of black america worked better in the teleprompter than it did in the room. who could have seen that coming? awkwardness aside, though, there's the nuts and bolts issue of senator paul's record on the issue of race and discrimination and civil rights, which the students at howard today knew about before he got there.

>> i thank you for coming, despite the fact you have spoken out against the civil rights act, against the voting rights act, and you've done it as a champion of individual liberties and states rights, and so i wonder, aside from the moral reasons not to discriminate, of which there are many, when is it okay legally to discriminate, according to you? >> well, i think it's a mischaracterization of my position, mischaracterization, i've never been against the civil rights act, ever. i still continue to be for the civil rights act, as well as enforcement of the 14th amendment. >> elaborate on that? this was on tape. >> there was a long -- there was an interview that had a long extended conversation about the ramifications beyond race, and i have been concerned about the

ramifications of certain portions of the civil rights act beyond race as they are now being applied to smoking, menus, you know, listing calories and things on menus, and guns. and so i do question some of the ramifications in the extensions, but i've never questioned the civil rights act and never come out in opposition of the civil rights act. >> i've never questioned the civil rights act. i could be wrong here, but i think the interview he was referring to in that clip is the one he did with me back on this show in 2010. i remember it, because it was the last time he ever spoke to me. during the interview, i tried for about 15 minutes to get him to state his opinion on the civil rights act, whethent on f5 minutes because i wasn't ever able to get a straight answer out of him on that question, even after 15 minutes of repeated asking. but the reason i asked him in the first place is because of what rand paul had told his

hometown newspaper on that subject just a few weeks earlier. >> would you have voted for the civil rights act of 1964? >> i like the civil rights act in the sense that it ended discrimination in all public domains, and i'm all in favor of that. >> but? >> you had to ask me the "but." i don't like the idea of telling private business owners, i have poor racism, i think it's a bad business decision to exclude anybody from your restaurant, but at the same time i do believe in private ownership. >> that was rand paul in 2010 questioning the civil rights act, and this is rand paul today. >> never questioned the civil rights act. >> rand paul saying at howard university today he never questioned the civil rights act is not true. and it's not true on tape, as the moderator noted today at howard. it's one thing to have a sketchy

record on racial discrimination you don't want to defend, it's another to think you can get away with flat-out lying about it. if you're a u.s. senator, you're googleable and people are going to google you so they will know it when you lie to their faces. we are now three weeks into the republican outreach program to minority voters. you think they are going to stick with rand paul being their outreach director or do you think they are maybe going to change gears here? governor of . you know how to dance... with a deadline. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle... and go. you can even take a full-size or above, and still pay the mid-size price. this is awesome. [ male announcer ] yes, it is, business pro. yes, it is. go national. go like a pro. plays a key role throughout our lives. one a day women's 50+ is a complete multivitamin

designed for women's health concerns as we age. it has 7 antioxidants to support cell health. one a day 50+. bjorn earns unlimited rewards for his small business. take these bags to room 12 please. [ garth ] bjorn's small business earns double miles on every purchase every day. produce delivery. [ bjorn ] just put it on my spark card. [ garth ] why settle for less? ahh, oh! [ garth ] great businesses deserve unlimited rewards. here's your wake up call. [ male announcer ] get the spark business card from capital one and earn unlimited rewards. choose double miles or 2% cash back on every purchase every day. what's in your wallet? [ crows ] now where's the snooze button? . . . [ tires screech ] [ beeping ] ♪

[ male announcer ] we don't just certify our pre-owned vehicles. we inspect, analyze and recondition each one, until it's nothing short of a genuine certified pre-owned... mercedes-benz for the next new owner. ♪ hurry in to your authorized mercedes-benz dealer for 1.99% financing during our certified pre-owned sales event through april 30th.

famously, upon winning a second term, president george w. bush immediately made a huge political stumble. he decided the first thing he was going to do was he was going to privatize social security, and the whole country laughed in his face. the more he talked about it, the more unpopular the idea became. and it did not take all that long before everybody realized this was just a misfire, it was a huge political mistake, so they gave it up. and to recover, the second-term bush administration decided they needed to change gears, do something totally different, they needed to hit the reset button and start over. they decided to start over with immigration reform. for people whon'ted the immigration system reformed, president bush promising to do that, starting with his state of the union address in 2005, it stirred up great hope that something really would be done. president bush's conservative base hate the the idea. it was a big right wing backlash to it, and in the end, nothing got done. >> from border states like here

in arizona, to unlikely places like south bend, indiana, and harrisburg, pennsylvania, illegal immigrants, alongside their supporters, stepped from the shadows, marching out of the american flag, they demanded a place at the american table. today in atlanta, an estimated 50,000 demonstrated, met by some of their opponents along the way. in tucson, arizona, police were on alert for counterprotesters from the group "border guardi guardians," who over the weekend burned mexican flags. today in dallas, a small plane carrying an antiamnesty banner crashed. >> president bush spent three years trying. his other big domestic idea, other big domestic fight that he picked was the supreme court. october 2005 he picked his own white house lawyer, harriet meyers, to fill the sandra daye o'connor seat on the supreme court, and again, the

conservative base hated it. >> pat buchanan, george w. bush is a conservative, he nominated harriet meyers, a conservative to the supreme court. you're a conservative. why don't you support her? >> tim, ms. meyers' qualifications for the supreme court are utterly nonexistent. she's not only not ruled or written on any of the great controversies of our time, religion, faith, morality, she has shown no interest in them in 40 years. we had an outstanding bench of conservatives, of traditionalists who had the right judicial philosophy and president bush ducked a fight. >> uncle pat does not speak for all republicans now and did not speak for all republicans then, but he did have his finger in the wind on that one and republican senators came back saying they really did not want her to get the supreme court gig, and president bush gave up on her. >> 24 days ago, president bush said one person stood out to replace justice sandra day

o'connor on the u.s. supreme court. he said his own white house lawyer, harriet meyers, was the most qualified choice, but many of his fellow republicans weren't having it. the votes weren't there in the u.s. senate, and so tonight, the meyers nomination has been withdrawn. >> president george w. bush advantage kwished the democrats in his reelection effort in 2004. maybe it was that that made limit take his hold over his own side for granted in his second term as president, but he did take his side for granted in his second term as president, and it cost him repeatedly. today, president obama released his proposed budget in washington, as a pragmatic, tough-minded compromise. predictab predictably, republicans hate it anyway, but this time so does a portion of the president's liberal base. liberals are calling it a betrayal, most particularly because it includes significant cuts to social security benefits. senator bernie sanders of vermont is calling the

president's budget a bitter disappointment. literal groups are threatening to primary any democrat in congress who supports this budget. elizabeth warren said today she was shocked by the budget. she said it dismantles social security inch by inch, noting that two-thirds of seniors rely on social security for most of their income, elizabeth warren said today, quote, they are hanging on by their fingernails to their place in the middle class. she said, we cannot chip away at america's middle class and break the promise to our seniors. should the obama white house see this as a george w. bush second term moment, a president taking for granted the supporters he cannot afford to lose and the ones he cannot afford have disenchanted with him, or are the parties not the same and do democrats aults see their base differently? do democrats really like these punch the hippie moments where they think complaints on the left make them look strong and centrist? it's one or the other. somebody i am darn sure knows

which way the white house sees us joins us next. meet the 5-passenger ford c-mc-max one. c-max two. that's a super fuel- efficient hybrid for me. and a long range plug-in hybrid for you. now, let's review. introducing the ford c-max hybrid and the ford c-max energi plug-in hybrid. say hi to the c-max hybrids. otherworldly things. but there are some things i've never seen before. this ge jet engine can understand 5,000 data samples per second.

which is good for business. because planes use less fuel, spend less time on the ground and more time in the air. suddenly, faraway places don't seem so...far away. ♪ suddenly, faraway places don't seem so...far away. google's backyard for the wbing it on challenge.. [fight bell: ding, ding] what's your preferred search engine? search engine, uhh, probably google. if we do a side by side blind test comparison, and you end up choosing google, you get an xbox.

i'll bet you the xbox, you bet me your son. well let's look up what you need. okay, i would do the left. yeah? what?! i am a daddy! bing wins it! bing won. bing did win. people prefer bing over google for the web's top searches. don't believe it? go to bingiton.com and see what you're missing. [ angry gibberish ] [ justin ] mulligan sir. mulligan. take a mulligan. i took something for my sinuses, but i still have this cough. [ male announcer ] truth is, a lot of sinus products don't treat cough. they don't? [ male announcer ] nope, but alka seltzer plus severe sinus does it treats your worst sinus symptoms, plus that annoying cough. [ angry gibberish ] [ fake coughs ] sorry that was my fault sir. [ male announcer ] alka seltzer plus severe sinus. [ breathes deeply ] ♪ oh, what a relief it is! [ male announcer ] try alka seltzer plus severe sinus day and night for complete relief from your worst sinus symptoms. and i don't believe that all these ideas are optimal, but i'm

willing to accept them as part of a compromise. if, and only if, they contain protections for the most vulnerable americans. >> president obama today releasing what he describes as his compromise budget, compromising with republicans on cuts to social security, especially, and in the process, enraging some of his own liberal base. is this a president who thinks he has much to lose by angering the otherwise loyal left, or is this a president who sees having a big visible fight with the left as a way to see himself look centrist, and, therefore, stronger? joining us now is a man who probably knows, david axelrod, former adviser to president obama, professor at the university of chicago and a senior political analyst for msnbc and nbc news. >> good to be here. good to be here. >> when you hear the criticism of president obama's budget from somebody like elizabeth warren,

somebody so closely aligned with, does that, as somebody so close to the president, does that sting or does that sound like good cover for him winning over some people in the middle and on the right? >> look, i think that we ought to back up and look at this for what, as i think he looks at it. really, we have a choice in this country. we have a republican vision about how we move forward that would not only turn medicare into a voucher system, but would decimate investments in the future in education, in research, in social spending generally that would leave standing all the tax preferences that benefit oil companies and other special interests, allow millionaires to avoid paying a proportionate share of their income, versus a vision that the president offered, and i think his view is, we've got a fundamental economic challenge in this country, we have to make investments in education,

research and development, in energy and infrastructure, he proposed a universal pre-k program. that's a progressive vision of how we build the economy, and as part of that compromise, he has other elements in here that are controversial, but i heard your setup piece, rachel, i don't see the analogy, because those fights that bush had were free-standing fights. they weren't part of this larger struggle, and i think most americans in this country, including those who consider themselves progressives, understand that that central economic challenge is the one we have to go after, and if we go down that republican road, we're going to exacerbate the problems that we've seen over the last many years. >> but in what the president has put forward, he's not trading away cuts to social security, and i should say, cuts to medicare for anything that he's getting from the republicans. the republicans are rejecting this flat out anyway, saying, sure, we'll take the cuts to social security and medicare, but we're not giving anything.

that funding for pre-k comes from a tobacco tax. that's the sort of stand-alone measure. being willing to be the party that wants to cut medicare and social security erases the biggest advantage that the kmktic party has over the republican party on economic issues. >> i hear that, you're talking like a political strategist and member of congress. i hear that, and understand it. there are people in congress who say let's not do anything about medicare, we can win on this issue, we can win in 2014, we can win in 2016, we can return ourselves to congress. the fact of the matter is, we do have to do some things about medicare. we have a situation now where we have baby boomers turning 65 every eight seconds, it's putting pressure on the system. we're paying out $3 for every $1 we take in in medicare. i think a lot of that can be dealt with through the reforms the president has been promoting to reduce the cost of health

care and get all of the, you know, some of the waste out of the system. but, you know, we have to do other things, as well. he's proposed means testing, for example, as part of his proposal. but i think it's unrealistic to say, let's not touch those things, because we'll give up a good issue. and we need that issue to win elections. i think at some point you have to stand up and say, let's take a look at the total picture what we need to do for the country moving forward and deal with them. >> i feel like the argument, you're answering my question implicitly by wanting to argue this on policy rather than talking about its political impact. i feel like what the white house must want is a fight with the left, because if it really was about the stainability of social security, you can get there without benefit cuts. these people stop paying the payroll tax contribution on social security at $110,000 or $113,000. you raise that by $100,000, you're only affecting people

that make that much money and you put social security on a path towards solvency. it makes more sense than cutting old people's benefits right now. i think this is a fight they want on the politics. >> i agree with you, and i think a combination of those things would be great. probably not salable, but good. we should mention that my understanding is the president's budget builds into it protections for older seniors, for people who are vulnerable, people on the lower end. but, you know, i know that i'm a political guy, i spent my whole life working on elections. two years in the white house, but you asked me what is the president thinking, and i don't think that he's sitting there thinking, how can i get some advantage by picking a fight with the left or picking a fight with this constituency or that. i honestly think what he's trying to do is pass a budget that keeps us from decimating our economy as the republican budget would, that restores the

sequester cuts that need to be restoerd, that makes investments that need to be made in things like education and in research. the things we know, infrastructure, $50 billion more in infrastructure. these are things that would help our economy in the short run, you know, expanding the earned income tax credit would help deal with inequality, so, i think he's looking at this. you say i'm talking policy you're talking politics, i think he's thinking policy. this is something i can get done. it is a reasonable people in the senate and the house could vote for it, and it would preserve the things and enhance the things that we need to do as a country. >> i believe you that he believes in what's in his budget, but i think that if really what he believes in is social security benefit cuts, he's going to feel the ground beneath his feet give way, and i think this is a start of a fight that ends badly for the democratic party and this president. >> i think he's going to have to make the case, rachel, as to why

a progressive view of social insurance programs is you have to do things to preserve them in the long run and it's not an honest position to say we can do nothing and these things will take care of themselves. >> nobody's saying -- that's not fair. nobody's saying do nothing. first of all, social security isn't the problem with the deficit. second of all, there sa way to fix it that has nothing to do with starving old people now and in the immediate future. have people pay more and the system is solved. if you wanted to approach just towards solvency, that's on the table. for the democrats not to say it's about policy, it's about politics. >> i think we should talk about both social security and medicare. there's no doubt that in the long run there are going to have to be adjustments made to social security, and there's no doubt that there are other ways to approach that. he said today he didn't think this was the ideal solution, and the reason he built in, i think,

those -- those preferences for the most vulnerable, for older seniors and so on, was because of his concerns, some of the concerns that you -- that you share here. but, again, i think the thrust of this is how you construct a budget that is passable, that is reasonable, and that can -- that preserves and enhances those things that are going to make our economy grow. and grow in a way that is progressive, that gives people a better shot. universal pre-k gives people a better shot, some of the higher education things he's doing gives people a better shot. research and development creates middle class jobs that are important for this country. medical research will save lives. all those are in jeopardy if there's not a path that can be embraced by the congress, and so i know what the republican position is today. let's see what the republican

position is in the ensuing weeks and months when they have to defend what is an indefensible budget on their part. >> david axelrod, former senior adviser for president obama. i think the republicans are going to be exactly where they are months from now, now. but we'll have you back in the meantime. >> i will be here to talk about that at that time. >> you're a good sport, david. >> thanks for having me, bye. with more moisturizers than seven bottles of the leading body wash. with ultra moisture your body wash is anything but basic soft, smooth skin with olay. as well as they could because they don't take it with food. switch to citracal maximum plus d. it's the only calcium supplement that can be taken with or without food. my doctor recommends citracal maximum. it's all about absorption. thto fight chronic.ommends osteoarthritis pain.imum. to fight chronic low back pain.

to take action. to take the next step. today, you will know you did something for your pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is a pain reliever fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill a day, every day, can help reduce this pain. tell your doctor right away if your mood worsens, you have unusual changes in mood or behavior or thoughts of suicide. anti-depressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. cymbalta is not for children under 18. people taking maois, linezolid or thioridazine or with uncontrolled glaucoma should not take cymbalta. taking it with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners may increase bleeding risk. severe liver problems, some fatal, were reported. signs include abdominal pain and yellowing skin or eyes. tell your doctor about all your medicines, including those for migraine and while on cymbalta, call right away if you have high fever, confusion and stiff muscles or serious allergic skin reactions like blisters, peeling rash, hives, or mouth sores to address possible life-threatening conditions. talk about your alcohol use, liver disease and before you reduce or stop cymbalta.

dizziness or fainting may occur upon standing. take the next step. talk to your doctor. cymbalta can help. mr. wiggles and curling irons. for the little mishaps you feel, use neosporin to help you heal. it kills germs so you heal four days faster neosporin. also try neosporin eczema essentials. why does my mouth feel dryer than i remember it to be? there are more people taking more medication, so we see people suffering from dry mouth more so. we may see more cavities, bad breath, oral irritation. a dry mouth sufferer doesn't have to suffer. i would recommend biotene. the enzymes in biotene products help supplement enzymes that are naturally in saliva. biotene helps moisten those areas that have become dry. those that are suffering can certainly benefit from biotene.

it was ten years ago yesterday or today, depending on the time zone, that u.s. marines pulled town a big metal statue of saddam hussein in baghdad. that wasn't how it was reported at home. i went to baghdad with richard engel in baghdad at the famous hotel when it happened and saw it come down. >> marines come in. >> group of iraqis look at them tentatively then start to go after the statue. >> the statue is like that height, it is tall. >> there was a guy with a big sledgehammer, wailing at the base of it. they started yanking on it, and it wasn't going anywhere. >> right. if i wanted to take that down with 100 of my closest friends u it is not going to happen. >> they start yanking on it,

then the americans said we'll give you a hand, you want to do it, otherwise it will take all day. >> it wouldn't make local radio in massachusetts. a bunch of people yanked on a statue, it wouldn't come down. >> or they watch it as the iraqis yank down a statue and collapse on them and kills ten people. americans help them pull it down. it was an awkward moment, one person put an american flag. >> over the face of the statue. >> american head that was tied to 9/11, a flag that had been in new york. and then it quickly erected this statue. >> which is. >> not great. it is odd. people in the square at the time, i was listening to them cheer. they weren't cheering the end of america, end of saddam, this is freedom, freedom. they were yelling and sharing

[ speaking foreign language ] >> giving a shiite sectarian chant. >> as it was pulled down. >> the toppling of that statue was ten years ago this week. the date on which the george w. bush library will be open to the public next month will be the ten year anniversary to the day of bush declaring mission accomplished in iraq weeks into the start of that eight yearlong war. on the ten year anniversary of that, his presidential library opens. on the ten year anniversary of the saddam statue being pulled down, house republicans celebrated by inviting former vice president dick cheney to a closed door meeting, for him to share with them dick cheney wisdom on foreign policy. former vice president reportedly told republicans at the meeting we are in, quote, deep doodoo when it comes to north korea. how does dick cheney know about

this situation? he bases that assessment on his own experience dealing with former iraqi dictator, saddam hussein. his record of dealing with saddam hussein was things like him telling us he had a nuclear weapons program he didn't have, while at the same time ignoring the actual nuclear weapons program that north korea really did have. north korea became a nuclear weapons state on the bush administration's watch while they were preoccupied starting a war for fun in iraq. that's who the congressional republicans are inviting to give advice on dealing with dictators, and the depth of our doo doo. that's who they're going to for advice. he didn't show up uninvited and they felt bad and let him in, they invited him to talk to them. he is their chosen expert. heaven help us. a kite, a breeze,

a dunk of grilled cheese. catches and throws, and spaghettio's. a wand, some wings, soup with good things. sidewalks and doodles and wholesome noodles. puddles and pails and yes, puppy dog tails. for a lunch like this, there's a hug and a kiss. because that's what happy kids are made of. campbell's. it's amazing what soup can do. and his new boss told him two things -- cook what you love, and save your money. joe doesn't know it yet, but he'll work his way up from busser to waiter to chef before opening a restaurant specializing in fish and game from the great northwest. he'll start investing early, he'll find some good people to help guide him, and he'll set money aside from his first day of work to his last, which isn't rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade. it's just common sense. you know it even after all these years. but your erectile dysfunction - you know,that could be a question of blood flow.

cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial.

you'll have to pay five hundred bucks for your deductible. the truth? at allstate, you could pay zero. allstate gives you a hundred dollars off your deductible the day you sign up. then another hundred off every year you don't have an accident. let the good hands reward your safe driving with a deductible that goes away. ♪ deductible rewards. one more way you're in good hands with allstate. ♪