thisqzwoñ huge intelligence com. on the contractor side. amy goodman from "democracy now." karen finney host of "disrupt with karen finney". and marc from "the '#c"ratlanti" that's "all in" for this evening. the rachel maddow show begins now. chris, am i allowed to congratulate you on the tie? >> yes. >> it's lovely. >> i'm all growed up. >> that's exactly right. you were here to see it, people. it just happened. all right. thanks to you at home for staying with us this hour. happy monday. we begin tonight with this very cool kid. her name is is cy fi. c-y f-i. cy fi is obviously cooler than i am and probably significantly cooler than you are as well. no offense. cy fi is the founder of something called defcon kids, an annual convention of sorts for

computer hackers for people who see themselveses as white hat computer hackers. see themselves as the good guys in the hacking world. the kids part of defcon is call the defcon kids. cy fi is one of the founding kid hackers of that convention. in 2011, cy fi figured out a vulnerabilivu vulnerability in mobile phone apps. she called a bug called time traveler that exists in games you play on your cell phone. she found the bug when she started to get born with the games. cy fi figured out she could speed things up by changing the time in the games. and in figuring out how to change the time con fig rafigurn the games, she found some glaring weak spots in games that supposed supposedly had been tested for security by corporate types. she found the time traveler bug in a game called smurfs village, she found it in pocket frogs, she found it in zombie farm, she found it and she fixed it in farm story. and she did all of this when she

was 10 years old. when i was 10 years old, is was fighting a daily losing battle with cursive. but cy fi was debugging cell phone apps. and at defcon kids in 2011, they as÷%t contest for other young hackers to try to do the same kind of work. it was a bug chasing contest for computer code, essentially. find it and fix it. and they named the contest after her. at&t, the big corporation, gave the prizes for winning that contest at defcon kids that year. because at&t is apparently one of those companies that's smart enough to know it's good to have hackers try to help you if you have the choice. see here in small letters on this logo there, see it's cy . fifi fifi. that's her contest. last year he contest logo ended up on this shirt on this guy. this guy is one of the most powerful people in the country. his name is keith b. alexander.

he's generally called general alexander because he is a general in the u.s. army. people who wear the uniform for a living sometimes don't exactly pull it off when all of a sudden they have to appear in public not in a uniform, so forgive him the tucked in t-shirt. there he is. general alexander is the commander of the u.s. cyber command. he is the director of the national security agency which we sometimes forget is a part of the military. and last year, as part of his job, running cyber command and running the nsa, he took off the uniform, put on the jeans and the t-shirt, and spoke to cy fi's defcon kids. he also talked to the grown-ups, to the white hat good guy grown-up hackers of defcon. that was him in the hacker contest logo t-shirt tucked into the jeans. got up on stage at the hacker convention and he talked to that room full of hackers because he, as head of the nsa, wants to hire them. >> i think the third bullet down is what we really want to do is innovate freedom. how we're going to look at where we take this next.

this is a great opportunity for not only our nation but for the world. and you know one of the things that i'm really proud of saying is when you look at vint cerf and the others, we're the ones who helped develop. we're the ones who built this besht internet. we ought to be the first ones to secure it. i think you folks could help us do that. >> the nsa general at the hacker convention. the u.s. government has openly been trying to hire hackers for a while now. especially for work in national security and intelligence. before general alexander went to the hacker's convention last year, the nsa put up a special website for recruiting computer hackers. it said "if you have a few, shall we say, indiscretions in your past, do not be alarmed. apply any how." general alexander in person at that convention told the hackers, "from my perspective what you are doing to figure out the vulnerabilities in our systems is absolutely needed." cnn had a reporter in the back

of the room who reported at the time when he said, what you're doing is absolutely needed, one of the hackers inñr the back of the room then yelled back at the general, thenu complex. right? last week in competing bombshell scoops, first the "washington post" and a few minutes later "the guardian" both reported on the existence of a giant u.s. surveillance system at the nsa called prism. the system vacuums up information from some of the largest internet companies in the country. stuff like your videos and your pictures and e-mails, your chats. so those things are not just traveling between you and whatever you are corresponding with on purpose, they are in a sense being diverted into the data caches of the u.s. government. the stories came with classified slides, leaked from what looked like nsa training materials. showing which internet companies were said to have customers' private date to flowing into this prisma began for each. leaked anonymously to the "washington post" and "the guardian.

"over the weekend, the person who said he leaked these slides came forward and identified himself. this guy who rocked official washington by leaking the details of this very highly classified surveillance program, he says he never graduated from high school. got a ged instead. joined the army. he washed out after getting injured in a training accident. he tells "the guardian" that he then got a job working as a security guard at a covert nsa facility at the university of maryland. he says he then got a job with the cia working computer security which seems like quite a leap from security guard to cia computer guy. but reportedly his computer skills, his internet skills, in particular, put him on the fast track in the intelligence world. then he says the cia posted him to switzerland under diplomatic cover maintaining computer network security. then he left government work for life in the private sector with high-paying jobs for at least two different intelligence contractors doing the same kind of work he had been doing for the government but now he was working for outside firms and getting paid bank. if you think about it, this guy

has had one hell of a career trajecto trajectory, right? from high school dropout to doing highly classified u.s. intelligence work for elite agencies. all over the course of less than a decade. and all while still just holding the title of technical assistant or something like that. the "washington post" quotes one former cia official saying that the terms the self-described leaker used to describe his positions at the cia, at least, did not necessarily match the internal descriptions of how jobs are described at the agency. "the guardian" made this video introducing the world to the man who leaked the nsa's documents, he was hiding in a hong kong hotel room. hiding from the largest superpower on earth because he, 29-year-old former technical assistant, had just leaked that superpowers tipious, top secret internet surveillance program. if what happened here is what he says happened here, this rather ordinary fellow apparently had access to devastatingly

important, very, very secret information from the government's perspective absolutely could not be leaked without causing great damage to the country. if it was so secret, and soñi important that it be kept secret, is it weird that he knew about it? and how many other people know about it, too? as far back as 2010 the "washington post" reported a third of all people with top-secret clearances in the country don't work for the government. they work for contractors. in january, the director of national intention reported that more than 480,000 contractors have top secret clearance. another 580,000 have confidential or secret clearance. that means more than 1 million contractors now, people working for private companies have after 9/11, the intelligence world changed. not just by getting massively bigger. it also changed in response to the diagnosis that part of a reason 9/11 happened is because dots were not being connected. intelligence was too compartmentalized. not enough people had access to

enough information to be able to see the whole picture, see how things related to each other. so the intelligence community was changed so that more people can see more stuff all at once. have those changes made it so your average 20-something guy with a clearance, and there are hundreds of thousands of them, has the post-9/11 changes made it so the average person with a clearance has access to way more stuff than your average grunt used to have access 9/11, would be a high-ranking person in order to have access to this kind of stuff that just leaked? does it make a difference so many of the people with clearances now don't work for the government, itself, they work for companies? they work for contractors? i mean, you can make your case either way, but the two most consequential leakers of this generation are this guy, who was working for a contractor, booz allen, and this guy, bradley manning who was working for the military. they both leaked. they were both pretty low-level guys but both had access to high-level information. what is most notable and similar about these two stories is not who they were working for directly, but the fact that

these guys were among hundreds of thousands of americans who have high-level clearances. high-level clearances that provided them as fairly low-level employees to access of highly classified documents. how can somebody who's a 22-year-old private first class or 29-year-old technical assistant access documents about programs that are so secretive their disclosure rocks the government to its core? and if you have that many low-level employees all looking at information about your vast invasive surveillance machine that the government will not talk about in public, how safe do you think that information is? it is almost the natural conclusion that one of them, among the hundreds of thousands, is going to decide to leak in the belief that what they're doing is ultimately for the public good. or at least to satisfy public curiosity. then if you are that low-level employee with that access to very highly classified supposedly superconsequential information, and you decide to let this stuff be publicly known, how do you decide what to do with it? if you're so technically

skilled, why not do it yourself? you're a computer guy. you're maybe even a computer geek, and i mean that tas a ter of endearment. why go through an intermediary? why go to the press? why go to two different media sources? why pick these reporters in particular? the writer for "the guardian" on these stories is glen greenwald, a guest on this show multiple times. i've known glenn a long time. longtime national security blogger who's critical of surveillance and of secrecy. he's a civil libertarian absolutist and one of the most eloquent ones we have. mr. greenwald has been outspoken in support of whistle blowing in general. he's been particularly outspoken about bradley manning. the writer from the "washington post" in these articles is barton galman. he has a reputation for major scoops about national intelligence. that history, and i think this may be important, has led him to be attacked as a reporter. him to be attacked not as a leaker, but as somebody who will publish information that the government maybe does not want published.

>> we have a special word for people who provide information to the enemy of their country. >> what word is that? >> what word do we use? traitor. traitor. >> i really resent accusations tpb:u-q not patriots or that we are indifferent to the security of the united states if we publish things that the government says are secret. i think what i do is every bit as patriotic as what a soldier does or what an intelligence officer does. >> if you were looking for safe journalistic hands for your story to publish information that the government did not want published, you can see the appeal of talking to that reporter, right? i should mention that from that clip, from "secrecy" from that

movie, the man who's calling barton gallman a traitor in that film is the former chief of information security at the nsa. barton gallman, "washington post" reporter who's has to defend himself against nsa chargers that he's a qñtraitor,e won the pulitzer prize in 2008 for reporting on dick cheney's influence over national security policy. that whole nonsense before the iraq war about the aluminum tubes that saddam could only be using for a nuclear program, barton gallman broke the news the white house knew those aluminum tubes knew they weren't necessarily nuclear at all when they were saying publicly the opposite. the connecticut librarians given national security letters ordering them to turn over information on people using the library, that was a bart gallman scoop. secret cia like agency inside the pentagon answering directly to donald rumsfeld was a barton gellman scoop. he broke the news that bin laden had been present at tora bora and the bush administration concluded he escaped from the battle there.

in march 2002, six months after 9/11, it was gellman who broke the news that the bush administration was making senior federal officials do bunker duty, making them live and work secretly outside of washington to ensure continuity of government in ace case of an attack on washington. on 9/11 the news it was vice president cheney, not president bush who ordered the shoot-down of hijacked civilian planes, that news was broken by barton gellman. joining us now is barton gellman, currently on assignment for the "washington post" and contributing editor at largúá6tr "time" magazine and senior fellow at the century foundation. barton, thank you for being here. >> thank you. >> let me ask you first in all of the voluminous reporting on your reporting, are there things about your story that are widely being reported wrong or poorly? >> well, the reaction is problematic because you have a lot of people going around saying that this is nothing

different than any other kind of warrant, this is a normal subpoena, it goes to a court, they find probable cause. then and only then does the government go into the servers of facebook or google or microsoft and extract information. and that misses something very, very big which is that there are secret opinions in the surveillance court which meets only in secret and issues opinions that are only classified that say that rather than having to specify a phone number or an e-mail, those are defied as a facility under the fisa law. you can now define the facility for which you're permitting a search to be the entire server, an entire network switch over which all library of congress passes every 14 seconds on the fiberoptic cables. that's the facility that you can serve. and it's certified once a year based on evidence and findings that no one else gets to see.

so the problem here is there is a mass systemic quality to this surveillance, and we have to trust the u.s. government when it says we're very careful to ensure that we're not targeting americans and we're not using their information appropriately. there's no check. >> in terms of the way the companies that are named in that one particular slide, the way the companies have responded, they have responded with seemingly pretty carefully worded, pretty vehement denials that they knowingly have nothing to do with this. what do you make of the way they have responded and does their description of their own behavior comport with what you understand about the program? >> they have excellent lawyers, and they're very well drafted, these statements, or they are addressed to something not terribly relevant. apple said, for example, at one point, we've never heard of prism. okay. so you don't know the code name. you know that the gentleman from the nsa and fbi came up to your door and asked you to make some arrangements. somebody else on facebook had a

very interesting statement. joe sullivan, chief security officer there, i know him. he's a good guy. and he wrote, when the government comes to us to ask for information about an individual, we review is carefully and make sure of probable cause and blah, blah. he didn't say they don't come to us and ask for the whole thing sometimes. he just talked about when they come for individuals. so they were all essentially designed to be evasive. one reason we know that is that the u.s. government has confirmed the outlines of the program in the course of commenting on it or in the course of asking us to withhold certain things from publication. >> could the companies, could any of the companies say no? and is it substantively important that twitter is not on the list of companies that are described as taking part in this program? >> i find it very interesting that twitter is not on the list. now, it's a younger company and so it wasn't as big and important in the early days of this program as it is now. but twitter also has a reputation deservedly for

fighting hard for user privacy and in particular in one case when it was a recipient of a national security letter which you're not supposed to -- and there were certain sealed orders against twitter. twitter fought in court for permission to notify the users so that they could object to the subpoena before the judge ruled. that's highly unusual for a company to do. i don't know that that's why twitter is not in this program, but you can look at it this way. according to the law, the attorney general has the power to compel a company to participate in this program and if the company drags its feet, it can go to the fisa judge, the secret surveillance court and get an order to compel. however, nobody wants to do that. i mean, when you have these sort is of giants, you have a giant clandestine program, you have very large, powerful but also highly regulated company, neither one of them really wants

to have a fight, so there's a prolonged negotiation. the companies have a lot of room for maneuver. so there's a five-year gap between the time that microsoft joins and the time that apple, which is the last of them join. apparently dropbox is said to be coming soon on these slides. clearly there are technical issues they have to solve, but p÷ companies can negotiate the access and the conditions. >> do you think that disclosing the contours of this program in a way that you have interferes with the ability of this program to continue or helps anybody who wants to evade this form of surveillance evade it? >> it's a matter of public record already that u.s. government asks u.s. companies to cooperate when it's collecting intelligence about foreign threats and foreign communications. the u.s. government has said that all along. the most highly classified thing in this briefing, as far as the

draft of the briefing was concerned, and he said it three different times, these companies are very important to us, we can't do anything that would harm them. what he meant was, reputational harm, market harm. harm to their public images. and to me, when something is classified for the reason that, companies are doing something which the public would strongly disapprove of, is exactly the wrong reason to classify something. it is a strong reason to think it is something we ought to bring to light. >> barton gellman for "time" magazine. currently on assignment for the "washington post." and a fellow at the century foundation and a very, very busy man. thank you for helping us understand that. stay in touch with us as this unfolds. >> i will, indeed. you know that guy who called me a traitor, i had him come to my princeton class i taught on secrecy and we had a great time. >> and did he recant? >> he said maybe traitors aren't all bad. >> very good. and then he killed you. all right. we'll be right back.

[ female announcer ] doctors trust calcium plus vitamin d to support strong bones. and the brand most recommended by... my doctor. my gynecologist. my pharmacist. citracal. citracal. [ female announcer ] you trust your doctor. doctors trust citracal. from capital one... boris earns unlimited rewards for his small business. can i get the smith contract, please? thank you. that's three new paper shredders. [ boris ] put 'em on my spark card. [ garth ] boris' small business earns 2% cash back on every purchase every day. great businesses deserve unlimited rewards. read back the chicken's testimony, please. "buk, buk, bukka!" [ male announcer ] get the spark business card from capital one and earn unlimited rewards. choose 2% cash back or double miles on every purchase every day. told you i'd get half. what's in your wallet? a friend under water is something completely different. i met a turtle friend today. avo: whatever you're looking for, expedia has more ways to help you find yours.

what i don't make any decisions about who to hire

without going to angie's list first. you'll find reviews on home repair to healthcare written by people just like you. with angie's list, i know who to call, and i know the results will be fantastic. angie's list -- reviews you can trust. with thermacare heatwraps. the only wrap with patented heat cells that penetrate deep to relax, soothe, and unlock tight muscles. and now, introducing reusable thermacare cold wraps. pain relief without the shock of ice. last year, president obama, for the summit of americas. 55 members of the secret service were sent to colombia two days before the president got there to prepare security for his visit. this is where they stayed. lovely place. it has fancy pools. it has green gardens. fountains. balconies. lots to see. lots to do. and a little time to kill in this magical caribbean

wonderland. what happened in colombia before the president got there for that trip was something out of the movie "the hangover" except it did not include zach, bradley cooper or a baby. it rather included the president's secret service. the relevant settings for understanding the course of that night include a fanlssy local strip club called the hard rock cafe, and a popular disco bar called tucandella. then there was the hooker situation. back at the fancy hotel after a negotiation of terms and some services rendered, there was apparently a dispute between two guys from the secret service and the young lady they had brought back to the hotel with them. she ended up complaining to the local police. the police ended up contacting the u.s. embassy and that ended up with not just them but other secret service agents getting outed for also bringing paid lady friends back to the hotel as well as for some rather epic

drunkenness. the president's big@pcr( to the summit of the americas is basically total overshadowed. that was last year. that was the secret service scandal in colombia. today, a new chapter. today cbs news published what it said were excerpts from a draft inspector general report. this, too, is about hookers on foreign trips. but in this case, the hooker patrons were not the secret service protecting the president. it's alleged to be the security detail that was protecting secretary of state hillary clinton. cbs citing eight recent investigations including one into the charge that members of former secretary of state hillary clinton's security detail, "engaged prostitutes while on official trips in foreign countries. problem, the report says, was endemic." wait, there's more. another one of the internal state department negotiations, "the case of a u.s. ambassador

who held a diplomatic post and was suspected of patronizing prostitutes in a public spark." "the state department inspector general's memo refers to the 2011 investigation into an ambassador who routinely ditched his security detail." this ambassador was reportedly summoned to d.c. where he was reportedly scolded by an undersecretary and then permitted to return to his post." no word on how much the scolding by the undersecretary set him back. the overall context here, the reason a memo or a draft report is being leaked here is because investigators from the diplomatic security service are saying that investigations like these were blocked or quashed by higher-ups in the state department. beyond the alleged hookers issue with the ambassador and the alleged hookers issue with the hillary clinton security detail, there's also a reported investigation into allegations that a state department security official in beirut engaged in sexual assaults with foreign

nationals hired as embassy guards." engaged in sexual assaults is weird language. i know. that's in quotes from this supposed report. there was another reported investigation into an alleged underground drug ring operating near the u.s. embassy in baghdad supplying state department security contractors with drugs. inspector swre eor general's of far says it doesn't comment on draft reports. the state department today said we take allegations of misconduct seriously and investigate thoroughly. the department's spokesperson saying the notion we would not vigorously pursue criminal misconduct in a case, any case, is preposterous. ambassadors would be no exception. state department says all the cases mentioned by cbs today were thoroughly investigated or still are being investigated, but honestly, with this much this salacious now circulating essentially -9unrebutted, this certainly not the last you will hear of this one. watch this face.

hey kevin...still eating chalk for heartburn? yeah... try new alka seltzer fruit chews. they work fast on heartburn and taste awesome. these are good. told ya! i'm feeling better already. [ male announcer ] new alka seltzer fruits chews. enjoy the relief! [thto fight chronic. new osteoarthritis pain.chews. to fight chronic low back pain. to take action. to take the next step. today, you will know you did something for your pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is a pain reliever fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill a day, every day, can help reduce this pain. tell your doctor right away if your mood worsens, you have unusual changes in mood or behavior or thoughts of suicide. anti-depressants can increase these in children,

teens, and young adults. cymbalta is not for children under 18. people taking maois, linezolid or thioridazine or with uncontrolled glaucoma should not take cymbalta. taking it with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners may increase bleeding risk. severe liver problems, some fatal, were reported. signs include abdominal pain and yellowing skin or eyes. tell your doctor about all your medicines, including those for migraine and while on cymbalta, call right away if you have high fever, confusion and stiff muscles or serious allergic skin reactions like blisters, peeling rash, hives, or mouth sores to address possible life-threatening conditions. talk about your alcohol use, liver disease and before you reduce or stop cymbalta. dizziness or fainting may occur upon standing. take the next step. talk to your doctor. cymbalta can help.

the president of iran has been in a helicopter crash. he's fine. he survived it. the "sun tabloid" in britain took the opportunity of the crash to refer to him in print as "the pint sized tyrant." "sun" always keep it classy. the way this helicopter crash is being reported on beyond the tabloids is a littlejf bit bizarre. and maybe a little bit important. and only one of a bunch of really weird things going on in

the strangest election in the world right now outside of the crazy republican ticket that's running in virginia. so that's coming up. helicopter crash and all. [ male announcer ] this is kevin. to prove to you that aleve is the better choice for him, he's agreed to give it up. that's today? [ male announcer ] we'll be with him all day as he goes back to taking tylenol. i was okay, but after lunch my knee started to hurt again. and now i've got to take more pills. ♪ yup. another pill stop. can i get my aleve back yet? ♪ for my pain, i want my aleve. ♪ [ male announcer ] look for the easy-open red arthritis cap. ♪ a brand new start.

your chance to rise and shine. with centurylink as your trusted technology partner, you can do just that. with our visionary cloud infrastructure, global broadband network and custom communications solutions, your business is more reliable - secure - agile. and with responsive, dedicated support, we help you shine every day of the week. ♪

the middle of this special moment and i need to run off to the bathroom. ♪ i'm fed up with always having to put my bladder's needs ahead of my daughter. ♪ so today, i'm finally talking to my doctor about overactive bladder symptoms. [ female announcer ] know that gotta go feeling? ask your doctor about prescription toviaz. one toviaz pill a day significantly reduces sudden urges and accidents, for 24 hours. if you have certain stomach problems or glaucoma, or can not empty your bladder, you should not take toviaz. get emergency medical help right away if your face, lips, throat or tongue swells. toviaz can cause blurred vision, dizziness, drowsiness and decreased sweating. do not drive, operate machinery or do unsafe tasks until you know how toviaz affects you. the most common side effects are dry mouth and constipation. talk to your doctor about toviaz.

taking a very sensitive classified program that targets foreign persons on foreign lands and putting just enough out there to be dangerous is dangerous to us, it's dangerous to our national security. >> leaking this information is dangerous to our national security. that was republican congressman mike rogers of michigan, top republican on house intelligence committee making the case that the mere disclosure of these surveillance programs over the past week essentially endangers the effectiveness of the programs going forward. if you talk about the stuff, we can't do it anymore. that specific argument is now being made on a bipartisan basis. republicans and democrats alike, not necessarily voicing outrage about the program, itself, some of them are, but most of them aren't. most of them are mostly outraged that we're talking about the programs. >> for me, it is literally, not figuratively, literally gut wrenching to see this happen

because of the huge, grave damage it does to our intelligence capabilities. the damage that these revelations incur are huge. >> this person is dangerous to the country. the fact that he has allowed our enemies to let our sources and methods are is extremely, extremely dangerous. >> we ought to be careful that we don't -- we are not discussing practices that we employ that would help the enemy evade our detection and apprehension. >> there's a reason why these programs are classified. if every step that we're taking to try to prevent a terrorist act is on the front page of the )árjy then presumably the people who are trying to do us harm are going to be able to get around our preventive measures. that's why these things are classified. >> president obama and senator john mccain rarely agree on anything especially as it relates to national security.

but on this, they agree. if you talk about this program, if you reveal the details of surveillance programs like this, essentially you rendered those programs ineffective. the bad guys know what we are doing, so doing it doesn't work anymore. is that true? in 2001, the bush administration had a dilemma. it was just after 9/11. they had the technological know how to conduct widespread surveillance on phone calls and e-mails, but they thought that something stood in air wtheir w. a law from the 1970s said if you want to something about that, gobble up that information wholesale, you have to go to a court. the pulitzer prize winning journalist ron suskind revealed in his book "the 1% doctrine" the thinking was that going to the court or trying to alter the 1978 act would somehow expose with leaks or just with questions that we would have to answer for what our systems capabilities were. so we just went ahead. the bush administration went

ahead with the program, forget the court, and eventually the program was disclosed to news outlets like "the new york times" and "usa today" through various leaks though they skipped the extra dangerous step of trying to make it all seem legal. guess what happened after it got exposed. guess what happened after the news broke in those papers about what the administration was doing. the program just continued. they just kept doing it. public disclosure did not forever destroy that program's e effectiveness. they didn't close up shop and go home. oh, now people have heard that we're doing it. they went on with the program. maybe with a little more oversight attached to it, but they didn't stop. does describing programs like this hurt them? has it ever over all the times things like this have been leaked over the past decade? joining us now is ron suskind, pulitzer prize winning journalist. the author of many bestselling books including the aforementioned "one percent

dockdoc docktrine." >> we with have a lot of experience here. there have been instances in 1 '01, '02, 0'03 things were disclosed. terrorists, people we're after, understand a great deal about this. many of their troops, many of their e-mails have been caught by it. this triparteid nexus. when they say, my god, we're handing a weapon, to the terrorists. the terrorists are very clear, anyone with a passing interest in this realm of terror understands exactly how this process works because it's been published many times in many places. in my book, in other books, in the newspapers. and that's certainly a main issue that they need to be concerned about. how do we get caught? how do we evade them? and so this whole notion that they say time and again, oh, gosh, now we've handed a weapon to the terrorists, now they know how we do it is actually pretty

hollow and i think they kind of know that. >> it seems like we're getting two arguments. one, this program has been irreparably harmed by discussing the details of it, and, two, the program is very, very effective, we just can't tell you how. neither of those is is an argument for we should be doing this. we are now as a country having an argument about whether we should be doing this. we didn't know to argue about it before because we didn't know for sure it was happening. we all suspected it. do you feel we were having a reasonable debate that's well informed? >> i think right now what's happening is people are comingw around again and again. it takes a while. it's taken the american people i think a while for their eyes to adjust, if you know what i mean. say, wait a second, this is how it works. i'm leaving a data trail wherever i go. and that data trail is one in which they don't really care about me because i haven't done anything problematic, but i am leaving a path for them to decide if they so see fit that i'm a problem. a problem for the u.s. government. dick cheney way back said, if you haven't done anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about. well, that's a kind of a

reversal of the way our systems of laws work. of innocent until proven guilty. and ultimately the accuser here is not so much an individual as a computer algorithm that says you made a phone call or a phone call seems to be attached to you, a server, a community of calls that you're a mart of. and thereby it's almost like, you know, you start with the lottery subset and next thing you know you're at the 7-eleven where they bought the tickets. well now you're at the 7-eleven where that rlottery ticket was bought and you may be in that group and all the while you don't know that you're in the last cut of 20 people that theç u.s. government's interested in. all this happens invisibly. now, the fisa court has a role. we've talked about that. but on balance, much of this is operated by a kind of a vastñr activated matrix to say this is interesting to us, whether it's a keyword search, you've said something in a phone call, whether it's a type of phone call that's being made. whether it's a connection

between a charge, an american express charge, where a phone call's made in a particular place. overseas, connected to america. i think what's interesting, though, is that people don't care nearly as much as i think most folks thought they would. >> right. yeah. >> startling. >> i think that we've started to realize, i mean, this is an argument that was actually made with some eloquence by the guy who says he is the leaker saying, you know, the internet is a tv that watches you. that this is a device and a tool that you get more out of when you give it more about you. and so we've decided to hand everything over. essentially so that we can get more out of this tool that we all use each day. >> yeah. >> does that mean that we have the idea that anything we do online, anything that has any digits associated with it at all, should ever be seen as something that is personal to us? >> i think people intellectually understand that they're leaving a data trail. i think we still feel like independent and autonomous people moving through the world without anyone watching us.

on balance, that's true, but what's created is an enormous digital net in which you are identifiable, and i think those two things, i'm part of this vast digital matrix and i'm an independent person who's anonymous, those two things are in conflict. i think right now you're seeing a moment where much of this that's already been reported is being reported essentially again and people are going, now wait a minute, let me think about this. i don't know if it's going to change behavior or not. i think we're waiting for that now. but it's certainly not something that the community of those who wish to do us harm did not know about. >> that's right. and the thing that i -- the thing that for me is intellectually orienting here is if we had been asked to make a decision on this before doing it, would we have decided to do it? because it happened without us deciding, at least a lot of us knowing we were deciding and that's the terms on which these debates should happen. >> maybe going forward that question will be proffered in some other fashion. as they move forward. there will be next chapters of

next generations of exactly this sort of surveillance activity i'm sure to come. >> ron suskind. pulitzer prize winning author of "the one percent doctrine." and other books. always good to have you here. >> my pleasure. >> we'll be right back. i want to travel, and i want the income to do it. ishares incomes etfs. low cost and diversified. find out why nine out of ten large professional investors choose ishares for their etfs. ishares by blackrock. call 1-800-ishares for a prospectus, which includes investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. read and consider it carefully before investing. risk includes possible loss of principal. you know it even after all these years. but your erectile dysfunction - you know,that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications,

and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial. i am an american i'm a teacher. i'm a firefighter. i'm a carpenter. i'm an accountant. a mechanical engineer. and i shop at walmart. truth is, over sixty percent of america shops at walmart every month. i find what i need, at a great price. and the money i save goes to important things. braces for my daughter. a little something for my son's college fund.

when people look at me, i hope they see someone building a better life. vo: living better: that's the real walmart. so you can capture your receipts, ink for all business purchases. and manage them online with jot, the latest app from ink. so you can spend less time doing paperwork. and more time doing paperwork. ink from chase. so you can.

the most junior member of the united states senate is this

man. jeffrey ciesa. he has been a senator for roughly five hours now. sworn in by vice president joe biden this afternoon. he was appointed to the seat by his longtime friend, new jersey governor chris the senate seat was previously held by frank lautenberg who passed away last week at the age of 89. a special election to permanently fill the seat that senator chiesa is now warming will be held in october. in october on a wednesday and not 20 days later on new jersey's regularly scheduled election day on a tuesday in november. that special election date is because governor chris christie wants that november day to be his election day and his alone. doesn't need any energized democrats raining on his parade by turning out to vote in an election. the deadline to enter primary to run for the senate seat was today at 4:00 eastern. here's congressman frank pallone of new jersey delivering petitions to get his name on the ballot today for the democratic party.

also throws hats in the ring on the democratic side, congressmaa rush hot, belt. also the speaker of the new jersey assembly, sheila oliver. mayor of the mayor cory booker. so that's the democratic field. as of today it's official, nobody else can get in. it's those four. frank pallone. rush holt, sheila oliver and cory booker. on the republican side this is interesting. you have the former mayor of bogoda, new jersey who is a serial campaigner tea party guy named steve lon gann. he ran in the governor's race twice and lost both times. his competition on the republican side a woman by the name of alita ecks. she's also a self-described tea party candidate. so if you want to know who is going to be the next senator from the great state of new jersey after this placeholder guy, we still don't know, but the republican field is not exactly a constellation of bright political stars. and the democratic primary ought to be a good fight.

between four accomplished serious-minded democrats who are all pretty well regarded and who all have real jobs in politics. on paper on the democratic side for that senate seat it is a great fight. it is a great fight on paper until you look at the other part of the paper that has the poll numbers on it. a quinnipiac poll out today shows that in the democratic field mayor cory booker leads by, wow -- he leads by 44 points, leads rush holt by 43 points. sheila oliver just got in the race last night, too late to be included in this poll. so we'll have to see once they start polling on her as well. but 53% to 9% and 10%? this race is starting as a blowout. we'll have to see if it tightens up. i want to make things more secure. [ whirring ] [ dog barks ] i want to treat more dogs. ♪ our business needs more cases. [ male announcer ] where do you want to take your business?

i need help selling art. [ male announcer ] from broadband to web hosting to mobile apps, small business solutions from at&t have the security you need to get you there. call us. we can show you how at&t solutions can help you do what you do... even better. ♪ can trust your instincts do... to make the call. to treat my low testosterone, my doctor and i went with axiron, the only underarm low t treatment. axiron can restore t levels to normal

in about 2 weeks in most men. axiron is not for use in women or anyone younger than 18 or men with prostate or breast cancer. women, especially those who are or who may become pregnant and children should avoid contact where axiron is applied as unexpected signs of puberty in children or changes in body hair or increased acne in women may occur. report these symptoms to your doctor. tell your doctor about all medical conditions and medications. serious side effects could include increased risk of prostate cancer; worsening prostate symptoms; decreased sperm count; ankle, feet or body swelling; enlarged or painful breasts; problems breathing while sleeping; and blood clots in the legs. common side effects include skin redness or irritation where applied, increased red blood cell count, headache, diarrhea, vomiting, and increase in psa. ask your doctor about the only underarm low t treatment, axiron. otherworldly things. but there are some things i've never seen before. this ge jet engine can understand 5,000 data samples per second.

which is good for business. because planes use less fuel, spend less time on the ground and more time in the air. suddenly, faraway places don't seem so...far away. ♪ humans. even when we cross our t's and dot our i's, we still run into problems. namely, other humans. which is why at liberty mutual insurance, auto policies come with new car replacement and accident forgiveness if you qualify. see what else comes standard at libertymutual.com. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy? the current president of iran has had the job for the last eight years.

mahmoud ahmadinejad. he's known around the world for defending iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons and denying the holocaust and hugging hugo chavez's mom. controversially hugging hugo chavez's mom. the hard liners at home were not happy about that hugging. the last time ahmadinejad was re-elected there were giant protests for months. a widespread belief that the only way ahmadinejad got re-elected was by rigging that vote. but rigged or not, ahmadinejad stayed president. he has been infuriating the west as iran's president for the past eight years. but this week we get a new one. iran holds elections to pick a new president at the end of this week. and yes, everything having to do with iran is very geostrategically important and very serious and it matters who they pick. but honestly, the sheer politics of this election they're having are amaze balls. the debates, three so far, that itself is not weird. obama and romney had three debates too. but every one of the iranian debates has lasted more than four hours. and it was at one of these

four-hour marathon debates in the second half toward the end of the four hours, when the moderator decided to change things up a little bit. we're going to try something new. lightning round. at the end of four hours the moderator decided to switch to yes or no questions. one-word answers only. it's going to be awesome. who's with me? i said who's with me? nobody was with him. the candidates totally shot him down and refused to go along with that part of the debate. >> talk about taking on the moderator, right? ignoring the fact that all the candidates were rejecting the whole yes or no questions thing, the moderator nevertheless

pressed press ed on with the yes or no thing and tried to force them into it. here's how that went. >> bad question. wrong. bad. so we're somewhere in the third or fourth hour of this debate. the candidates are clearly very displeased with the format. if you're the moderator here, obviously you know the thing to do now is to give them all a rorschach test. the moderator switched from yes or no questions to pictures. he held up eight different pictures, and the candidates had to talk about their feelings about the pictures. there was a farm, a ship, a picture of heavy traffic, a hospital. one of the candidates responded that the picture of a farm made him think about a farm.

he also said that the picture of the hospital made him think about iran's obesity epidemic. iran has an obesity epidemic. iran is just like us. also, iran is just like john boehner. just as republican house speaker john boehner and other american politicians have endeared themselves to even their political critics by crying a lot in public, turns out iranian politicians are crying a lot in this election as well. this is one of the presidential candidates getting so choked up in a tv interview that the station had to abruptly cut to commercial. another one of the candidates decided to make a long campaign video that was mostly just images of him crying. his own campaign video is him sitting alone in a theater watching things that made him sad and then cry and then they filmed him crying and released that as his vote for me campaign ad. it should also be noted that crying in public has kind of tried and true appeal in iranian politics right now. mahmoud ahmadinejad himself, he has a reputation in the west as a pugnacious guy but for a domestic audience he likes to be seen as a frequent cryer.

and to top it all off, in the leadup to this week's voting mahmoud ahmadinejad was in a helicopter crash. ahmadinejad, the current president, the guy whose election sparked all the protests a few years ago, the guy who's really deeply controversial at home, the guy who certain elements of the current iranian government are not pleased with, last week he was in a helicopter crash in the northern part of iran. he's fine. nobody died. but the media reports on the ahmadinejad helicopter crash put air quotes around the word "accident." as in president ahmadinejad just survived a helicopter crash. it's reported to have been an accident. nudge nudge, wink wink, yeah right. again, though, he's fine. the media apparently thinks he was set up. and the debates all last four hours. and the candidates sometimes mutiny on the moderators and there are rorschach tests for the candidates to respond to and there's a lot of fake crying for positive political effect including well-produced long campaign videos that are just good the crying. the iranian elections are turning out to be amazing.

even before we find out if they're going to be rigged again this time too. voting is on friday. watch this space. that does it for us tonight. thanks for being with us on this fine monday night. now it's time for "the last word" with lawrence o'donnell. thanks for being with us. okay. let me get this straight. the nsa is a big scary surveillance monster that knows everything we do. but it didn't know that one of its own contractors was working with glenn greenwald on a massive leak about the nsa? tonight i'll ask glenn greenwald if his own experience is actually evidence that the nsa isn't really so scary. and david axelrod is here to respond to the accusations against the obama administration. >> i'm no different from anybody else. i'm just another guy. >> opposition to the government's sweeping surveillance program now has a public face. >> 29-year-old edward snowden revealed himself -- >> 29-year-old edward snowden. >> he leaked information