suspicious circumstances. does that mean that mr. issa has stolen cars and committed insurance fraud? no. but it does problem the power of selective information. thanks for watching. chris matthews is next. you mean there's no scandal? let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews up in new york. let me start tonight with this. once there was a whiff of scandal, you know that whiff of can dal over at the irs. now we learn there's not even a whiff. no, just one desperate california congressman whose bluff has been called. and with us tonight, the man who called the bluff, u.s. congressman elijah cummings, ranking democrat on the house oversight committee. thank you about this whole thing. you have produced today a lot of information, a lot of

transcripts. tell us what they show about whether there was a scandal at the irs, a screw up or what. >> it shows basically that there was a republican a conservative republican manager in the cincinnati office, chris who felt that it was his duty to look at certain cases. and so one of his managers under him said, look, this is back in february of 2010, said look at this case. and i think we, we ped to take a look at it because they are asking for to do political activity but they want tax exemptions. so the manager, this conservative republican self-proclaimed by the way, said you know what? you're right. and he sent the case up to washington office of the irs. and so basically, chris, you know when you look at all of the transcripts, there has not been

one single syllable alleging in any way that the white house was involved in this targeting. but yet, still our republican chairman and other chairmen in the house have gone about saying that there was some enemies list and that the administration was not being forth right. and that they were involved. well, there's nothing like that. it basically started with one man who believed that he was doing his job. and he so happened to be a conservative republican who spent six hours with our committee in an interview and he was very candid and very honest. and he felt that what he was doing was consistent with what he was supposed to do in the job that he held. and so you know, i think basically i got sort of tired, chris, of seeing transcripts

being leaked parts of transcripts being leaked by our chairman. but at the same time, not transcripts of this particular gentleman not being put forth. so that we could get a complete story. all i want to do is make sure that the american people have the complete story. >> you know, you're a very humble guy, congressman. you're the ranking democrat on that committee. i got to tell you, we cover thenous every hour around here on msnbc. this story has been popping around here for more and a month the big scandal at irs. maybe you don't realize the noise that's been created by this crazy charge of scandal. somebody in the white house, somebody in the campaign. somebody has an enemies list at the white house, somebody got the people, the bureaucrats over there to go and attack the enemies of the white house. all this, all this is nothing. right? >> yeah, that's exactly right. that's exactly right, chris. the interesting thing, this past

weekend, our chairman home run various reporters in his offices reviewing in some instances full transcripts and allowing them to see various transcripts but the interesting thing is that he did not reveal one syllable of the transcript that we released today. and all -- and i keep telling our chairman and our committee, this is about, chris, integrity. you know, you could release all the transcripts for all i care. we will follow the evidence wherever it leads. but let's not you know cherry pick a few facts, a few lines from our transcript and then give one impression when exactly the opposite will be seen if the entire transcripts of all the transcripts are put out there. and that's what this was all about. >> it seems to me it's worst than just a failure to deliver on a promise. it looks to me the way the chairman of the committee's handling this and handling your

disclosure today of the statement from the person over there who ran the operation who said it had nothing to do with politics or anybody outside the irs 0 or that unit, it seems there's a cover up instead of the guy looking for a cover-up, there's a guy committing one. that's my charge. let's go through some of the findings here. we now have insight into how this mess starred. the first case was flagged in cincinnati. it was a group manager, the self-identified republican actually who centralized these cases for consistency because they were all similar. in other words, those files for nontax exempt status or tax exempt status were all identified as tea party. it was a cincinnati-based screener under him that developed the inappropriate screening criteria using terms like patriot and 9/12. a manager didn't learn about the terms till over a year till they were put in place. you found that to date, no witnesses have identified any white house involvement here. in other words, this was a technique used shorthand like we often do in any business

government or nongovernment to try to get a job done. it turned out it was tainted because it was generalizing about a groups that had the same name. >> yeah. and i think chris chris, if you read the transcript, it's clear that this republican republican conservative republican manager, you know, he put his party hat to the side and he was doing what we would hope that nel public employee would do, and that was be independent and do the job according to the law. and clearly, the ig came back and said there was some mismanagement here. i need some clarity as to tax exempt status. who should get it? things of that nature. and so again, here is a man who was trying to do his job. and that's basically what he said. >> here's darrell issa. here's the chairman of the committee's reaction to you. i want to know what you think of this. boy, this is crocodile tears. i am deeply disappointed that

ranking member cup mings has decided to broadly disseminate and post online a 205 page transcript that will serve as an irs to navigate with congress. after unsuccessfully trying to convince the american people that will irs officials in washington did not play a role in inappropriate scrutiny of tea party groups and declaring on national television that the case of theist -- he seems to be implying that you never said that this didn't have to do with the irs. the charge from him has been from day one, political hanky panky from the white house. he issues code like washington all over the place. always the shell game goal to blame it on obama. he doesn't have an iota of proof, does he? >> no, there is absolutely no proof. people can actually see the transcript and it's very clear.

but there's something bigger than darrell issa here. and that, again, chris is integrity. we've got irs employees who thought they were doing the right thing. they testified that they believed that they were doing the right thing. but poor management, all kinds of problems within the irs need to be addressed. but there was absolutely no -- absolutely no, they said there was no political involvement. white house was not involved. and this fellow, this republican conservative acted on his own accord. >> now, you say that's -- we have enough information now to basically recognize this has been a problem that's contained. never went beyond the irs operation. why haven't you released all the transcripts of the interviews conducted by your committee? >> great question. you worked on the hill. i try to defer to the chairman. i don't like the releasing of transcripts, to be frank with you. and the only reason we released

ours is because we saw the cherry picking and part of the story being told. and you know, i've told the chairman that i want to sit down with him and to try to determine how best to, he and i, to release should release transcripts in the future. i still have not gotten a response with regard to that. we've asked for meetings on it. we've gotten no response. and chris, keep in mind, that before we even released our transcript, the chairman had told had said that to do it would be reckless. so i then asked them and you know, what can we do, what portion of the transcript should we redact so that it won't be reckless so it won't be a road map. we have not gotten an answer yet. >> would you like to see him do the appropriate redactions just to prevent identity, but would you like to see him basically release the whole she bang? >> i want -- let me tell you

what i want, chris. i want the whole truth, nothing but the truth, period. whatever that takes. and not a one-sided case where the american publicing is forming an opinion about something that is only half there. and is not completely true. >> just to completely finish this discussion, is there any reason not to release everything? >> i don't see a reason not to do that, but again, i'm willing to work with the chairman to do whatever we can to do a responsible investigation and not a witch hunt. chris, chairman issa and i, we are entitled to our opinions. we are not entitled to manufacture facts. >> i would call more a fishing expedition when you come back in an empty boat. thank you, congressman. great work for you. i think we've got this, at least so far it looks like this whiff of scandal is not even a whiff. coming up on "hardball,"

whatever happened to the gop's plans to stay out of women trouble, going after women on issues where they better not have gone? house republicans are voting to challenge roe v. wade again by banning an borgs after 20 weeks of pregnancy, they're closing the window on abortion challenging the supreme court. if you're trying to reclaim the middle in this country, don't leave out the women again. defending surveillance. the head of the national security agency says stop worrying what we're up to. they've helped to thwart 50 terrorist attacks. could some of those attacks, however, have been stopped without all this surveillance? maybe that's what we're going to learn more about. there also might have been more risk. let'set welcome jeff duncan to the confederacy of dunces. otherwise known as the birthers. let me finish with my request that congress or somebody let the american people vote whether we go to another war or not. isn't this another democracy?

this is "hardball," the place for politics. [ male announcer ] i've seen incredible things. otherworldly things. but there are some things i've never seen before. this ge jet engine can understand 5,000 data samples per second. which is good for business. because planes use less fuel, spend less time on the ground and more time in the air. suddenly, faraway places don't seem so...far away. ♪

it's certainly not too early to think about 016. hillary clinton just got a big boost from a high profile u.s. senator. missouri's claire mccaskill announced she's supporting her already even though she hasn't announced whether she's running or not. she's the first to get on board with the ready for hillary super pact. she was an early obama supporter in 2008. i guess she likes to be the first one on the train. we'll be right back. "off the beaten path"... he said. "trust me"... he implored. alas, she is beginning to seriously wonder... why she ever doubted... the booking genius. planet earth's number one accomodation site: booking.com booking.yeah!

welcome back to "hardball." gender breakdown in the 2012 election was stark as everyone knows. president obama won the women's vote by a ten-point margin. so bad for republicans they began a soul searching autopsy to figure out what went wrong. well, among other things, women voters went wrong for them. it appears those lessons haven't sunk in yet. house republicans tonight are bringing to the floor a bill

that would been abortion at 20 weeks. not only does it violate supreme court precedent which says women have a right till the 24 week mark. it won't get through the senate and it won't get the president's signature. he said so. even charlie dunn of pennsylvania seese the political truth here. i think it's a stupid idea to bring this up. the economy is on everybody's mind. confidence in government is eroding and now we're going to have a debate on rape and abortion? this doesn't steam like the way for republicans to win back the middle politically. joining me is joan walsh and michael steele, his new book is the recovering politicians 12-step program to survive crisis. both are great members of our team here. the bill on the -- the pain capable unborn child protection floor is on the house floor. here are two congress women,

michele bachmann on one side, debbie wasserman-schultz on the other. >> this bill is extreme and an unprecedented reach into women's lives into women's personal lives. this is a clear indication that the well-being of women in this country is not something republicans care to protect. >> this is a picture that was taken of an unborn baby yesterday. this is the age of a baby, the youngest age at 20 weeks that this bill is referencing. and this is the picture of the mom. we're here because we care about women. >> well, there we have it. a hot new debate. the republicans have been using the issue politically without having to deal with the calamity that would come if they get to outlaw abortion. they don't have to deal with the reality of it because the court protects them. >> exactly. they will go at it over and over and over again. they will say that science is on their side. when this notion that fetus feels pain, that doesn't happen till the viability mark probably 24 weeks. none of us like talking about

this stuff. again and again, we're shoved into having this debate over a bill that will never become law. and i don't get it. i don't know what michael's party is doing. >> we have michael here. it seems to me, i've read a lot of newspaper this morning. one of the articles was it may have been in politico, the republican party, i think it was michael gershon in the of washington post said you've got to protect your christian conservative right. it's the largest chunk of your party. the reason you do this is you think there's politics here to be gained in terms of solidifying your base. >> i think gershon is absolutely right about that. there is a lot of political calculation going on here. the reason why we saw, for example, the beginning of this congress backing in 2011, you had for, you know, an abortion bill. at the end of the last president's term, again, there was rumblings of putting apportion bills on the table.

this is to lock in that base which quite frankly, chris you and i have talked about this the base for over 30 years has been looking for the party to lead the way to overturn roe versus wade to give the supreme court or put a court in place. >> how is it doing? >> what it does is, i think it does two things. it says to them, look we're fighting for you, knowing that the bill isn't going to go anywhere but you're putting it in the context of conversation around the country. >> you think that conversation is good for your party to be challenging? >> no. >> women and -- >> no, i'm trying to explain to you some of the machinations and thinking behind the scenes here. >> what side are you on? >> i think this is a crazy conversation to have right now. first off, for the political reason it's not going anywhere. more importantly, this is not where our strength is. this is not what women are talking about. women are trying to find jobs for themselves, their kids. trying to move their businesses. that's a sweet spot for us. let's talk about that. these other issues will take care of them elves in time. >> i just wonder about that,

joan. i'm pro-choice and i know you're pro-choice. i wish we could get together and have a national campaign to reduce the number of abortions voluntarily because that's what it's going to take. it's going to be legal. reduce it through birth control, adoption, through education. there are ways to do it without interfering >> people who waist their times doing this are also against birth control so they're contributing to more abortion. >> you get into late term. there are options for adoption at that point. it should be part of a national discussion. earlier today, on msnbc, congressman marshall blackburn who is cosponsoring this bill is managing the debate was asked whether brinking this bill up when it has zero chance of passing is actually pandering to the christian right. let's listen. >> no, it isn't pandering at all. it's saving the life of women and of babies, pandering? absolutely not. i can't believe you would say something like that.

my goodness. >> pandering. i just said it again because michael makes the point and we have made the point this is not going to get through the senate which is pro-choice beak and the president's pro choice basically. this is what, feeding people politically on a regular basis so they know you're paying attention to them without doing thinking. >> it's feeding people politically. they think they're smarkts clever, they now put a woman's face on their anti-women agenda. i want to praise our colleague craig mehlman, he handled that situation very well. she is someone who went on "meet the press" two or three weeks ago and said ha women don't want pay equity bills. i mean, she down the line opposes contraception down the line, opposes pay equity. she's against the women's agenda but she is a woman. they think they're being cute by putting her out there instead of trent franks the disaster. >> the "huffington post" reports

today house minority leader nancy pelosi and congresswoman, all pro-choice, have briefed house freshmen on what's caud the new women's economic agenda in quotes. in effect rebranding labor issues as gender issues. it includes raising minimum wage, more affordable child care, of course, and passing the paycheck fairness act. leader. he will pel said "i think it's an accumulation of issues that come back to respect for women whether it's respect for a woman's judgment when she decides or has to chos but to enter the workforce or how she is compensated. there is an equal way. she said all these have mothers, all the members be of congress do, they have mothers, daughters, sisters, wives that must must think they have value in the workplace. is this smart for the democratic said to say baby we can't win on older issues that have gotten less exciting by saying, these are hurting women because they're the people that often get minimum wage. they're the ones who certainliern are concerned about

equal pay instead of just saying another labor issue. saying these are gender issues. is that smart politics? >> it is very smart politics. i bre gujingly give my hats off to nancy pelosi for framing the argument this way. it goes back to the point i was just making. so you have house republicans tonight voting on an abortion bill and the former speaker of the house talking to women about pay inequities and creating opportunities and finding a level playing field for them to break break glass ceilings which goes back to the point this is a sweet spot for the go, it should, particularly when it talks about women-owned businesses and cathy enterprise zones and those strategies that empower those women entering the marketplace and who have been in the marketplace. that's not the conversation we're having with the country. >> don't listen to what we're saying now, but we're talking about this guy michael steele. do you think that moderate approach he's taking, do you

think he might make a really good republican candidate for governor of maryland. >> he has to come and talk to me about women's economic issues, too. these are women's economic issues. rick scott vetoing the paid sick leave bill. you've got -- and then pick perry vetoing pay equity. so republicans are failing on the economic issues, as well, michael. let's talk. >> michael's a different breed of cat in this regard. aren't you, buddy? >> i am a different breed. this is why i'm here and not at the rnc. >> thank you so much michael steele, as he ponders his future. i have no idea what he's thinking. i would be a fine public official. thank you, joan walsh. i am a voter in maryland. thank you michael steele. tomorrow, senator joe manchin of west virginia will join us. he is a gutsy guy defending himself against attacks by the nra after proposing a reasonable background check expansion which would include gun shows.

that's all he's done ladies and gentlemen of west virginia. up next, the birthers, the shameless birthers are back. this is "hardball," the place for politics. ♪ [ male announcer ] everyone has the ability to do something amazing. ♪ some just do it, on a more regular basis. ♪

♪ in dealerships everywhere. in theaters, june 14th. because all these whole grains aren't healthy unless you actually eat them ♪ multigrain cheerios. also available in delicious peanut butter. healthy never tasted so sweet. vo: i've always thought the best part about this country is that we get to create our future. you get to take ownership of the choices you make. the person you become. i've been around long enough to recognize the people who are out there owning it. the ones getting involved and staying engaged. they're not sitting by as their life unfolds.

and they're not afraid to question the path they're on. because the one question they never want to ask is "how did i end up here?" i started schwab for those people. people who want to take ownership of their investments, like they do in every other aspect of their lives. i did? when visa signature asked everybody what upgraded experiences really mattered... you suggested luxury car service instead of "strength training with patrick willis." come on todd! flap them chicken wings. [ grunts ] well, i travel a lot and umm... [ male announcer ] at visa signature, every upgraded experience

comes from listening to our cardholders. visa signature. your idea of what a card should be. much back to "hardball." now the sideshow. first jimmy fallon finds a way 0 connect president obama's approval ratings to the miss usa pageant. here's a quick prefresh her on miss utah's difficult response tops equal pay for women in the workplace. >> i think we can relate this back to education and how we are continuing to try to strive to figure out how to create jobs. we need to try to figure out how to create education better. so that we can solve this problem.

>> well, here's jimmy fallon's take on that. >> there's a new poll found that the president's approval rating dropped eight points in the last month. and based on how seize done so far we can actually see wa his future ratings will be. next week his an prochbl ratings will go up three points. let's see why. he makes it illegal for your friends to post photos of that i ever babies on facebook. in july his ratings will drop five points. obama hires miss utah as his speechwrit speechwriter. finally in august, lisa approval rating will rise 12 points. let's see why. obama appoints ryan gosling as spector of handsome. >> next, birthers pt barnum once said there's one born every day. there are people in the congress today who say president obama was not born in the united states. here's south carolina republican jeff duncan within dick wils questioning as he puts it, the president's validity.

>> well, all you guys are rounding up and deporting the illegal immigrants, any chance the house may actually pursue barack obama's phony identification papers? >> well, you know -- >> that's the original scandal, congressman. that's the original scandal. >> in november, people should have voted against him in november and i'm afraid that that wouldn't get to the supreme court where it ought to get. >> but if we know that they're lying about all these other things, why not go back and say well maybe the first scandal was a lie too. >> there you go. i'm all with you. let's go back and revisit some of these things because americans have questions about not only the irs scandal but also about the president's valid night what an embarrassment. he shares the house homeland security oversight subcommittee and he says president obama is not a legitimate president. next a congressman introduces

his colleague from american samoa. what could go wrong? a lot. >> the michigan republican who has a side career as a santa claus impersonator was serving as speaker pro tem yesterday afternoon. when it came time to introduce his colleague from american samoa or as he put it -- >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from american samolia. mr. benga. >> thank you. >> thank you, mr. speaker. it's american samoa. >> i can see the challenge from the gentleman's name out there but it's not somalia. up next the case for american surveillance. the head of the nsa tells congress it's helped stop dozens of potential terror attacks using that technology. you're watching "hardball," the place for politics. [ male announcer ] moving object detection.

♪ blind spot warning. ♪ lane departure warning. safety, down to an art. the nissan altima with safety shield technologies. nissan. innovation that excites. ♪

i want peacocks. peacocks? walking the grounds. in tuscany. [ man ] her parents didn't expect her dreams to be so ambitious. italy? oh, that's not good. [ man ] by exploring their options, they learned that instead of going to italy, they could use a home equity loan to renovate their yard and have a beautiful wedding right here while possibly increasing the value of their home. you and roger could get married in our backyard. it's robert, dad. [ female announcer ] come in to find the right credit options for your needs. because when people talk, great things happen.

i'm hampton pearson with your cnbc market wrap. the dow surging 138 points. the s&p up 12. the nasdaq adding 30 points. home construction jumped 6.8% in may as more buyers entered the market with a low inventory of houses for sale. consumer prices rose slightly. up. 1% last month. as cheaper food prices were offset by higher energy costs. chrysler agreed to to recall renearly 3 million jeeb vehicles after the government said they copotentially burst into flames if rear ended. now back to "hardball."

>> what i can be say unequivocally is that if you are a u.s. person, the nsa cannot listen to your telephone calls and the nsa cannot target your e-mails. >> and have not. >> and have not. they cannot and have not by law and by rule unless they, and usually it wouldn't be they, it would be the fbi, go to a urt coulden an obtain a warrant. >> welcome back to "hardball." that was direct and that was president obama on charlie rose last night defending the government's use of sweeping surveillance techniques the details of which recently posed by edward snowden. americans remain divided about the usefulness of these programs. a pew poll out last night, brand new number barely a majority of people think the leaked programs help prevent terrorist attacks. all of that was before today's

testimony by intelligence officials on.capitol hill. in a house hearing today the nsa and fbi declassified several chilling stories of terror plots inside the u.s. they said were foiled with the said of these programs. here's sean joyce discussing the details of two plots one of which references the legal statute that authorizes the program that looks at e-mail. >> in the fall of 2009, nsa using 7.02 authority intercepted an e-mail from a terrorist locked in pakistan. that will individual was talking with the individual located inside the united states talking about perfecting a recipe for explosives. the fbi followed him to new york city. later, we executed search warrants with the new york joint terrorism task force and nypd and found bomb making components in backpacks.

zazi later confessed to a plot to bomb the new york subway system with backpacks. nsa utilizing 702 authority was monitoring a known extremist in yemen. this individual was in contact with an individual in the united states named khalid wazani. wazani and other individuals that we identified through a pfizer fisa that the fbi applied for through the fisk were able to detect a nascent plotting to bomb the new york stock exchange. he had been providing information and support to this plot. the fbi disrupted and arrested these individuals. >> the nsa and the fbi detailed two other cases one targeting a danish newspaper and another plot. keith alexander is also disclosing the sheer number of plots they've intercepted. >> in recent years, these programs together with other intelligence have protected the

u.s. and our allies from terrorist threats across the globe. to include helping prevent the terrorist, the potential terrorist events over 50 times since 9/11. >> joining me now is jim himes, democratic from connecticut. it looks to me if you listen to what the president said last night and you look at the testimony today, the president could not have been more clear. he denied that the united states government has the legal capability or intends to do if it did have the legal capability to try to find out what we're saying on the telephone or our e-mail. it has to be gone through, if you do get a target opportunity, you have to go through the courts and get a warrant. that would be the fbi, not the nsa. it sounds like there's a lot of room between the scandal here as has been described and the reality. >> yeah, well, part of the problem is there's a ton of misinformation out there. people believe their phone calls are being listened to. the president is right.

by all accounts from everybody we've talked to, that is not true. that doesn't mean we shouldn't still ask a lot of questions about you know, a historically unprecedented collection effort. there's no indicationing that capturing the verizon disclosure, that capturing people's telephone metadata is illegal. it appears to be legal under the patriot act. but we haven't had a chance as a country to have a discussion whether we're comfortable with that and haven't done the work which we need to do to find out when the general alexander and others say that this has been important to helping us or contributed to helping us with 50 terror attacks. how important? those of us charged with oversight need to find out, what was it essential, was it tangential? what are we giving up for what is a an historically unprecedented collected effort here. >> did you know about all this before snowden blew the whistle? >> i didn't. >> you're a member of congress.

shouldn't you know. >> your average member of congress not on the intelligence committee, most did in the 0 know about it. the intelligence committee said they informed the committees. somewhere along the run of the mill member of congress, that got lost. most members of congress were not aware of these programs till snowden leaked them. >> when you guys hang around the cloak room and take the elevator together all day long talking about the latest scuttlebutt, is it considered proper or improper for people like dianne feinstein and the members on the house side to share information they get on the intelligence committee or are they supposed to keep it to themselves? >>. >> you hope you're not talking about it too much on elevators and escalators. >> should they share it. >> i would tell you that programs like this that you showed the polling that split the american people that take us to the very edge of where we should be comfortable in terms of the government collecting our private information, we need to have a much more comprehensive

set of disclosure for all members of congress for more than a small group of people to know about it. >> i agree with that. the country has to have checks and balances on everything like this including wars. when are you going to vote on getting involved in the war in syria? >> when are we going to have a vote in the congress on these kind of decisions? >> speaking as one member, there are a whole lot of areas where the executive to my way of thinking has probably just stepped a little far over the line in terms of committing troops in terms of getting information that i'm not sure we're all comfortable with and frankly you remember two weeks ago, doj going after the associated press. we're really pushing the line of where we've been historically in protecting civil liberties and freedom of the press and congress, of course, constitutional duty to declare war. >> someone should remind the president and the rest of the people in this country that even when japan attacked, the empire of japan attacked hawaii, even then we had to play defense and go after them, they still went to congress for approval of

declaration of war. now we're making these wars of choice and we're going in and helping the libyans backing from behind. and then we're going into syria. how about a little vote now and then. it's called democracy. >> thanks, chris. >> let's turn to stam stein with the "huffington post." reading this as a journalist and looking at this stuff and the president's presentation to charlie rose last night, is he closing the door on the fact that -- is he proving to the american people everything's on the up and up here? >> it's a tough call. on the one hand, you know, it would be -- it's logical this program is effective. you're collecting so much data that if it didn't turn out that it resolved or prevented attacks, it wouldn't make any sense. if you step back and look at the numbers, you begin to wonder how eb it is. general alexander said 50 potential terrorist irrelevant attacks were thwarted. ten of them could have been domestic terrorist attacks. this is a program that took place over a seven-year period

of time. it leads to the question, is it what we're doing, the cost, the potential infringement on privacy? i'm not sure the president's made the case yet. his administration is doing a better job tan they were last week but they have a ways to go. >> they seem a little slow. we're finding out now there was no irs scandal. they will could have told us that the first day. here's president, by the way. he called the nsa programs transparent and said i am not dick cheney. he pronounced it differently. let's take a lis. >> and should this be transparent in some way. >> it is transparent. that's why we set up the fisa court. some people say obama was this raving liberal before. now he's dick cheney. dick cheney sometimes says he took it all lock stock and barrel. my concern has always been not that we shouldn't do intelligence gathering to prevent terrorism but rather are we setting up a systems of checks and balances. >> that's a great question, sam. when he says transparent most

people would say you walk down the street and look in the saks window at christmastime, you can see through the window. who can see that we're mining metadata or we're using p.r.i.s.h. m. to go after our e-mails? we didn't no that. >> obama is not dick cheney. this isn't warrantless wiretapping. they are getting warrants. secondly, he's briefing members of congress. there's been at least of 35 briefings on the p.r.i.s.m. program. however, as you point out correctly this isn't transparency. this is checks and balances. but there's not transparency here. the fisa court is issuing rulings in secret and a bunch of senators on capitol hill have been asking them to publicize their opinions so we can get a scope of the surveillance state. probably because doj is saying don't do it. it would hurt our national security. they have not been transparent. >> up next, you november peter

flor rick for the show the good wife. actor chris noth joins us here in new york city. this is "hardball," the place for politics. yes she is, yes she is. [ bop ] [ male announcer ] could've had a v8. 100% vegetable juice, with three of your daily vegetable servings in every little bottle. wthto fight chronic.aily vosteoarthritis pain. to fight chronic low back pain. to take action. to take the next step. today, you will know you did something for your pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is a pain reliever fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill a day, every day, can help reduce this pain. tell your doctor right away if your mood worsens, you have unusual changes in mood or behavior or thoughts of suicide. anti-depressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. cymbalta is not for children under 18. people taking maois, linezolid or thioridazine or with

uncontrolled glaucoma should not take cymbalta. taking it with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners may increase bleeding risk. severe liver problems, some fatal, were reported. signs include abdominal pain and yellowing skin or eyes. tell your doctor about all your medicines, including those for migraine and while on cymbalta, call right away if you have high fever, confusion and stiff muscles or serious allergic skin reactions like blisters, peeling rash, hives, or mouth sores to address possible life-threatening conditions. talk about your alcohol use, liver disease and before you reduce or stop cymbalta. dizziness or fainting may occur upon standing. take the next step. talk to your doctor. cymbalta can help. >> here's goodnous whether he deserves it or not for florida's governor rick scott. as a approval numbers at an all-time high. 43% approve the job he's done versus 44 who don't. he's still trailing charlie crist in a hypothetical 2014

gubernatorial race. crist 47 it, for scott an approval rating below 50 and re-elect number below 40 is not a recipe for greatness or success. we'll be right back. [ kitt ] you know what's impressive? a talking car. but i'll tell you what impresses me. a talking train. this ge locomotive can tell you exactly where it is, what it's carrying, while using less fuel. delivering whatever the world needs, when it needs it. ♪ after all, what's the point of talking if you don't have something important to say? ♪ if you don't have something important to say?

and didn't know where to start. a contractor before at angie's list, you'll find reviews on everything from home repair to healthcare written by people just like you. no company can pay to be on angie's list, so you can trust what you're reading. angie's list is like having thousands of close neighbors, where i can go ask for personal recommendations. that's the idea. before you have any work done, check angie's list. find out why more than two million members count on angie's list. angie's list -- reviews you can trust. i love you, angie. sorry, honey. when you do what i do, iyou think about risk.. i don't like the ups and downs of the market, but i can't just sit on my cash. i want to be prepared for the long haul. ishares minimum volatility etfs. investments designed for a smoother ride. find out why 9 out of 10 large professional investors choose ishares for their etfs. ishares by blackrock. call 1-800-ishares for a prospectus, which includes investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. read and consider it carefully before investing. risk includes possible loss of principal.

♪ ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] for dad's first job as dad. nissan tests hundreds of child seats to give you a better fit and a safer trip. snug kids, only from nissan. ♪ well, anyone who watches "hardball" knows one of my favorite shows on tv is "the good wife." and chris noth plays the politician and the newly elected governor of illinois. peter florek is one of the stars of the show. it's all about his toughness, the velvet glove brutality that is part of the politics. let's watch this guy in action. >> i thought you only

contributed to female candidates. >> i do mostly support female candidates. but i like your wife. you two are separated? >>. no. >> yes. >> but she is supporting you? >> yes. >> they're trying to work things out. >> by not sleeping with prostitutes? if i do support you, do i have to worry about that, another prostitute, another mistress, campaign buzz. >> no, you don't. >> and why is that? >> because i just told you. >> peter has changed. that's why. >> i don't believe people can change. >> you know what? i didn't either. and then, of course, i went to prison. >> oh my god. chris noth joins us right now. what i like about this character, and i think the reason why your wife in the movie, in the tv show likes you is because she can fix things. you're tough. and when you had the relationship with the prostitute on the show. >> oh, yeah. >> and she was going to squeal you out one more time, you said i'm going to tell your gangster

boyfriend what you've been up to. it was brutal. you won the election but get an offer of some extra votes you shouldn't get, double counting. and you very casually say yeah, i'll take them. >> if it come downs to that. >> so what do you think it says about politics the guy is willing to cheat if it works. >> this is tv politics, of course. >> no. most people who watch the show, they think they're getting a slice of life. >> i think like all good politicians, he is compartmentalized. and while he can be a good father, he can, you know, cut the throat of a political opponent if need be. and cannot look at it as unethical and still, you know, go on and be a good guy in other matters. so that he doesn't -- once he does the act, he doesn't think about it, it's done and on to the next. >> how is that different than tony soprano? >> good question. >> i know you call yourself a redneck democrat. i want to know, compare that with what president obama is.

is he too genteel? >> i wish -- i wish, and he seems to be getting a little tougher. i wish some of the other democrats would start speaking up a little more. i would like to see our governor, who is terrific, governor cuomo speak up a little bit more. he doesn't seem to be speaking to much on the national level. but i think we got to get behind him. although i think this whole syria thing is terrible. i don't hear enough democrats with the mouthpieces that these republicans have. and the platitudes that come out of their mouths, just like who is going to give them a little tap in the head and say liar, you know. pants on fire. >> i think the shows on tv right now, "house of cards", "good wife", "homeland." ." >> a few years ago people said you can't make a political show. >> house of cards is on a shakespearean level in

publication, fantastic. they really go to some dark places. we like that. >> i want you to take a look at something you have been talking about here to our producers that is a picture of the body language of president obama with the real tough guy that is -- what is the guy? putin. >> putin. >> let's take a look. what does that tell you? >> putin looks like a thug here, or he had about five bad oysters. and it looks like obama is trying to make the best of it. just horrible situation. it's like what is this, is the cold war back? >> that's what it looks like. they're talk about syria. kennedy met with khrushchev and came back and said i was savaged. it's terrible. in a way this could be another introduction to the cold war. with the situation the way it is. does he really think he is going to be able to deal with putin and syria? >> syria has been a client state of the soviet union since the baathists took over back since forever in the cold war. let me ask you about democracy. do you think we should vote about whether or not we get in

wars or not? should somebody vote or should we just do it? >> it should be a vote. we don't seem to learn the less seasons of a lot of wars in the past. you know, i don't think you can make the same comparison with vietnam. but i just wonder sometimes when you look at history if we had just had the courage, some of our presidents to say i'm not stepping into this. if we didn't step -- if during vietnam, johnson, who was tortured by it had suddenly stepped back and said i'm getting out. >> by the way, you play a politician i believe in. i love florek because he is tough as nails and gets the job done. not the nicest guy in the world, but a pretty good husband. chris noth, thanks for joining u. we'll be right back after this. [thinking] i'm still working. he's retired. i hope he's saving. i hope he saved enough. who matters most to you says the most about you. at massmutual we're owned by our policyowners,

and they matter most to us. whether you're just starting your 401(k) or you are ready for retirement, we'll help you get there. because vitamin d3 helps bones absorb calcium, caltrate has the highest level of vitamin d3. more than any other brand, to help maximize calcium absorption. so caltrate women can move the world.

to help protect your eye health as you age... would you take it? well, there is. [ male announcer ] it's called ocuvite. a vitamin dedicated to your eyes, from bausch + lomb. as you age, eyes can lose vital nutrients. ocuvite helps replenish key eye nutrients. ocuvite is uniquely formulated to help protect your eye health.

now that's a pill worth taking. [ male announcer ] ocuvite. help protect your eye health. and now there's ocuvite eye + multi. an eye vitamin and multivitamin in one. and now there's ocuvite eye + multi.

for a store near you go to benjaminmoore.com/bayarea. let me finish tonight with this. let me say it loud and clear. if we're going into another mideast war after afghanistan, after the u.s. invasion of iraq, after our leading from behind in libya, shouldn't there be some kind of vote on whether we do it or not? shouldn't we do it the right way and end diplomatic relations with the government of syria before we start handing out rifles to people who kill the leaders of that country? if we are going to commit an act of war against another government, shouldn't we be straight up about it? whereas overthrowing islamic governments what we do now? is that now the natural business of this country? why don't we change the name of department of defense to the department of killing islamic people on global television department, because that's what we've been doing for a dozen

years. i'm being sarcastic because it's the only way to describe what i consider the true american reaction to this thing we now do without having a vote on the matter. we don't bother to declare war because it's just a normal thing we do. why declare it when war has become the new damn normal. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "politicsnation" with al sharpton starts right now. thanks, chris, and thanks to you for tuning in. tonight's congressman issa exposed. he is the chairman of the house oversight committee. and i pointed out many a times he has been on a crusade against the obama administration. he called the president corrupt. he pushed for the attorney general eric holder to be held in contempt for the first time in the nation's history. and he has tried and failed again and again to put the stink of scandal on the obama administration. but today