let the texas messages in. >> i don't know how to thank you for helping us through the coverage. skraungt capehart, jimmy williams and julian epstein, we're grateful for your coverage, too. stay with msnbc for continuing coverage of the george zimmerman trial. >> equality. let's play "hardball." >> good evening. i'm chris matthews up in new york again. the zimmerman trial is continuing and we will update you on the latest developments in a moment. but first let me start tonight with had huge supreme court decision striking down the defense of marriage act. it means that the united states government opposes any discrimination against same-sex couples married in one of the states that recognizes the same-sex marriage. married means married. if you're married in one of the states that recognizes marriage by same-sex couples, you are

maefrd in the eyes of the government of the united states as of today. i would have gone further than the decision today. i think the 14th amendment to the constitution could not be more clear, "nor shall any state deprive any person of life liberty or property without due process of life nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. tell me how a state can deny a couple that right to marry without denying liberty? and how can a state be allowed the couple without due process of law? did they commit a crime. >> i heard doifd boyce say something outside the supreme court today. he said the decision by the court today striking down doa, against of marriage act will be followed by the same decision against california's prop 8 when that measure gets to be properly brought before the court which it hasn't so far. i agree with david as i often do. the wheels of justice turn slowly but they will some day and they will some day grind

finally. we'll get the court decision america deserves some day. for now it is a time to celebrate the american be constitution and the rights it protects. justice correspondent pete williams joins me now. pete, what a day and what a direction. it just seems like even though it's only justice kennedy but the future has been pointed out to us today. >> well, it's very interesting, chris, that just yesterday, the supreme court greatly disappointed the civil rights community in america by striking at the heart of the voting rights act. then came back today and struck down the defense of marriage act giving great hope to the advocates of same-sex marriage across the nation. >> right. >> now, i think you very accurately characterized what the decision says. it does not say that any state has to allow same-sex marriage. what it says is in the states ta choose to do so, the federal government cannot refuse to recognize those marriages. justice kennedy's opinion for five members of the court said that such a distinction by the

federal government serves no legitimate government purpose and demeans people in those states who are recognized as legally married in the states and also humiliates is the word he used tens of thousands of children of same-sex couples. so that was a huge decision. and then in the second big decision today, the court tossed out the legal challenge to california's proposition 8. the challengers had brought. a lower court had declared it unconstitutional. and today the supreme court basically let that lower court ruling stand. it said that the people who put prop 8 on the ballot had no legal authority to come here to the supreme court and try to get the supreme court to overturn that ruling. this opinion written by chief justice cut john roberts said in order to have the legal standing in federal court, you have to show some specific injury to yourself. just having a keen interest in a subject or a general grievance or it just makes you mad isn't enough. you have to show that you yourself are injured. he said the prop 8 proponents

could not make that demonstration. a couple other quick points. number one, when can same-sex marriage start in california? probably not for another 25 to 30 days. wheels of justice have to move, they have to send the order back to the court of appeals. il say this, the prop 8 proponentses insist there is another way for them to pull prop 8 out of the hat. they haven't given up yet. they think there is a technical way they can get prop 8 reinstated in california. but i would say that the chances of that are pretty slim. so two huge decisions here, c is. >> let's put it together. most married couples live a like this. upper middle class, middle class. they grow up and get married in their 20s or tw irts in new york state which now recognizes same-sex marriage. maybe in their late 60s, they move to a state like florida. in normal cases in the past, that couple is still married in florida. of course.

will they still be married in the eyes of the federal government once they move to florida having moved from a state that recognizes same sex to a state that doesn't? >> as of today, no, with two minor exceptions. for the most purposes of federal law, the federal rules look to the rules of the state where the couple goes, not to the rules of the state where they got married in the first place. now, the obama administration says it's going to scramble right now to change those rules. so for example, if you're married here in the district of columbia and you file your taxes jointly because you're a married couple and then you move to indiana, presto, the irs no longer thinks you're married as the rules are written, even with doma struck down. the administration says it's going to start rewriting those rules and try to harmonize them so they apply as you said. >> we've got chaos facing us without conformity. it's interesting to of in the way that we're still learning something about where we're headed, as well.

chris, thank you for joining us. pete williams for nbc news. chris was one of the plaintiffs in the prop 8 case. here's what he said today. >> today is a great day for american children and families. sandy and i want to say how happy we are, not only to be able to return to cal and finally get married, but to be able to say to the children in california no matter where you live, no matter who your parents are, no matter what family you're in, you are equal. you are as good as your friends' parents. and as your friends. >> sorry about that. i'm just putting famous and faces together. obviously that was she. ed oif windsor was the plaintiff in the dense of marriage case. she was forced to pay taxes that a married straight couple wouldn't have had to pay. today she won her fight. here's what she had to say. >> we won everything we asked and hoped for.

wow i'm honored and humbled and overjoyed to be here to today today to represent not only the thousands of americans whose lives have been adversely impact the by the defense of marriage act but those whose hopes and dreams have been impacted by the same law. >> we're joining by gavin newsom, governor of california and christine quinn the speaker of the new york city council. ip christine quinn, first of all, you're gay up against anthony weiner. i think you're pretty mainstream. let's talk about this. it's so fascinating. this is pretty nonpartisan. judge rendy very much a reagan personal prend and appointed by him, ted olson who fought for bush down in the bush versus gore fight in florida and only one democrat. so two out of three guys, men all straight i believe all straight pushed through this thing. it isn't just a gay rights movement in a narrow sense.

>> not at all. look, these decisions today are huge steps forward. and they're steps forward in what they ruled but also you're totally right in who ruled, it was involved in the case and this idea that lgbt civil rights are just some special interests that only a few americans care about who live in california or new york. that reality does not exist anymore. this is much more becoming a pain stream movement. i think that's what's going to help propel us forward. eddie is a new york gal and i want to thank her for all her bravery. >> new york is a liberal state in this regard. not everything. not taxes sometimes. governor new smrks you were a pioneer, in can the fa, you were sort of like john brown or something in the precivil war days. you got in trouble for it. if prop 22 came up today, not 22, prop , if this it came up today that banned same sex

marriage, it looked like it was getting so close it would go the other way now. >> no question be it. >> so the people of california, if they got the vote in your state, they would vote for same sex? >> there's no question in my mind. now, that said that was the backdrop of today's decision if in the worst case prop 8 was upheld, we were ready to go forward with a ballot initiative next year with that confidence in mind. christine knows this and i think everyone watching, even people opposed to marriage equality understand the generational shift. if you're 29 and younger, you overwhelmingly support marriage equality regardless of your political stripes. every single day into the future, it's more and more likely we're going to right these wrongs not just here in celebration of what happened in california and across the country with doma but now in those 37 other states where we still have a lot of work to do. >> let me ask you about this

chris quinn and fork and this whole question of the country. what are we going to do if we have a country that ends up being divided this way, you're going to have parts of the country where the federal government supports you, you get social security, retirement. in the military, i guess they're going to recognize that fully night. every right as a separate person you get as a gay person. the minnesota minute you step out of your state to retire where it's warmer, i was struck by what our experts said the. >> this is not the full victory but it's a great step forward. we should be really happy today and really gratified but shouldn't be satisfied because we can't really be satisfied until marriage equality is a right for everybody and every state and if -- i'm not leaving new york but if one was crazy enough to leave new york wherever you went, you would still be recognized as married. that is the ultimate goal. we're not there today. but we now can leap off of a really firm foundation. we're not fighting against a

federal law that you said my family was less than your family. that's now gone. and that creates a different construct for forward motioning >> governor, i want you to talk about san francisco. we had jeane kirkpatrick back when it was already to do gay baiting and she would refer to like the san francisco democrats, hee, hee, hee, i get the feeling i think it is my favorite city although i'm a philadelphia guy. there's nothing like your city. it is a spectacular city. it's also a gay mecca. what is the feeling in that community tonight about this as well braler to moment? >> at our best chris, you know this, and for that matter the best of our state and country, we don't kent tolerate diversity. we celebrate it each and every day. we unite around those things that dr. king so eloquently talked about, those things that bind us together. that's what we celebrated that spirit and pride that comes in shape and form when we celebrate those differences as we did with this decision today.

so look, that spirit is permeating the city. than sense of possibility and hope that we can take this had message across the country as christine said to all of these other states. so eventually we go back in front of that supreme court and have the loving versus virginia adjudication and get this addressed on the issue of merit and deal with those remaining states that still deny full equality for all of their citizens. >> i'd like to see as i said in the opening, go all the way with the lawrence decision where david boies said we ought to go and recognize liberty and due process and come down on the states that don't want to go along with this. would you like to see that happen. >> krood like to see it happen for everyone. it's going to be hard. i want to follow-up on one thing pete williams mentioned. in the ruling around prop 8, it was really are said that for this case to move forward, there would have had to have been harm against someone else. the court said there was no harm against the folks who brought the case. that's important in my opinion

because it underscores what we've always said. my marriage doesn't harm anybody else. and those who put that argument out are today made very clear, it's an absurd and baseless argument. >> christine, you'll be good for new york some day. i'm just kidding about this. it is the new normal. i think you're fabulous and you would be great for the city. >> governor newsome has been on his way to greatness for so many years and once again achieved his goal, equality. >> god bless. >> thank you, chris. >> thank for coming on. why today's supreme court decision means so much to regular people. this is formal recognition by the united states government, not just legal recognition of same-sex couples. this is a big moral and emotional issue to people. we're going to talk about that, especially the people in the lgbt community it telephone self. but everybody, you're all one of us now. officially. you knew this was coming. darrell issa now claims, oh, no, i never said the white house was behind those alleged targets of

conservatives. not me. well, two things. yes, you did, darrell. can i call you darrell when you said the targeting came out of washington, that meant the white house. and two, there was no targeting conservative groups. he was misleading the corrupt about who was behind something that never happened. that's not a great start for a career. plus the other supreme court decision on the voting rights act. we want to show you the immediate effects of that decision so far where states are moving right away to limit access to the polls in places like texas, mississippi, alabama, they're already trying to screw the black voter. watch what they did. and witness for the prosecution. martin's friend takes the stand. she was on the phone with trayvon martin moments before he was killed. this is "hardball," is the place for politics. on angie's list before i do any projects on my home. i love my contractor, and i am so thankful to angie's list for bringing us together. find out why more than two million members count on angie's list. angie's list -- reviews you can trust.

[ whirring ] [ dog barks ] i want to treat more dogs. ♪ our business needs more cases. [ male announcer ] where do you want to take your business? i need help selling art. [ male announcer ] from broadband to web hosting to mobile apps, small business solutions from at&t have the security you need to get you there. call us. we can show you how at&t solutions can help you do what you do... even better. ♪ there's a fascinating moment that happened live here on ms nbc earlier today. thomas roberts was interviewing

chris perry. when clad griffin the president of the human rights campaign interrupted with an important phone call. take a look at this. >> the president's on the line. from air force one. >> go ahead. >> hello, mr. president? this is kris perry. >> sandy and we thank you so much for your support. >> we're proud of you guys and we're so glad that in california, and in a growing number of states across the country because of your leadership -- you should be very proud today and for your courage. you're helping out a whole lot of people everywhere. >> thank you, mr. president. >> it was like nixon talking to the astronauts. we'll be right back after this. [ agent smith ] i've found software that intrigues me. it appears it's an agent of good.

♪ [ agent smith ] ge software connects patients to nurses to the right machines while dramatically reducing waiting time. [ telephone ringing ] now a waiting room is just a room. [ static warbles ]

[ roars ] ♪ ♪ [ roars ] ♪ [ roars ] ♪ [ male announcer ] universal studios summer of survival. ♪ today' r's historic supreme court decision comes two days before the 44th industry of the

stop wall riots. they're named after a big riot up here about equal rights in new york city down in the village which gay rights advocates say began the movement in this country and ten years to the day of another supreme court decision, the lawrence versus texas case which struck down anti-sodomy laws. well, the gay rights movement has made enormous gains in recent years and today's decision is the milestone showing how far it has come. jared is a democratic member of the congress from colorado. and richard was an advisor to the great bill clinton when he was president. congressm congressman, very few people know what it's like to run for congress when you're openly gay and now to be there at a time that the federal government has not just officially legalized same sex marriage but formalized its regularity if you will, made it equal and very much the same thing as straight marriage in terms of its its authenticity,

its reality. to me, it's a staggering decision today. >> you know, as you know, the capitol and supreme court are across a lawn. there's a lot more happening on the supreme court side than the capitol side for equal rights. i was over there this morning, thousands of people on the steps of the court gazing at the columns and really excited that our relationships of gay and lesbian americans in fully committed relationships will now receive recognition. >> did you think when you were growing up or as you ran for congress, did you see the united states constitution on your side? >> you know, you mentioned stonewall. frankly, my generation had a lot easier than the generation ahead of me, the pre-stonewall generation. today's kids growing up have it a lot different than i did in schools across our country, taking a same sex date to prom knowing you can marry the person you love. it's amazing the speed we've made progress. the american people are a good people. and they recognize loving

relationships and in all their forms. today's supreme court decision was an important step if the right direction. >> richard, you were there with bill clinton. we had a bill signed by the president called the defense of marriage act which was anti-gay marriage. you were there, now you're here. bill clinton now celebrates what the court decision said today in knocking down what he signed. how do you put all that together? >> the first thing i want to say about the decision is i think the language in the decision is very affirming. and it really reflects the cultural change that we've seen in the 17 years since clinton was president. you know, he has written about it, he's talked about it. he had that "washington post" op-ed in which he asked the court to overturn doma. i think he's expressed a lot of regret. i think that today. >> regret, is it the right word or did he do what he had to do? i am an understanding person about politics. i understand at the time, the country wasn't there. why should the president be

there? a number shows the country is there. look at this number here right now. back in 2004, and you were well into this fight before that, it was 30% of the country. less than a third supported guy marriage, same sex. then in 2009, it leapt about 25% and went to 41. and then it went another 25% and went to 53. it's almost double where it was in this century. >> that is why the ruling today is possible. is because you see public be opinion shifting. and that is also -- >> you feel that opinion. >> i feel it around myself. i feel is in you know, on -- in popular culture, on tv, in the news, in politics. we had a record number of lgbt americans elected to congress. times are really changing. but it's because people have come out. because now people know gay people as their friends, as their neighbors. as their kids, as their parents. it's because gay people have come out that this -- >> i agree with that.

>> this legal moment is possible because of the cultural moment. >> also because people run for office now openly. congressman, tell me, has the wall gone down in colorado as it has in say massachusetts or rhode island? >> it's interesting. in my sexual orientation has never been an issue in running for office. there are six openly gay members of the house. none of them come from gay mek cag districts like san francisco. they're from regular suburban districts, are riverside, california, madison, wisconsin, suburbs of new york city. i'm from the suburbs of denver. it's never been an issue on the campaign trail. >> let's talk about reality for one minute. it seems like young gay people get mobile, they can pick a college where they want to live. they go to the cities. they go to atlanta, they don't want to stay in the rural areas. is that a reality we live with for a long time? >> any did to the big cities. when i was in law school, i never thought i could run for office because i was a gay

person. i thought maybe i could serve in appointed office. maybe i could serve behind the scenes. but i never thought i could run for congress. it is a totally new day. >> jared polis from the suburbs of denver and richard has been in this fight a longer than many of you have been alive. up next, trayvon martin's friend took the witness stand today. she was on the phone with the dead man before he was killed. this is "hardball," the place for politics. with the spark cash card

from capital one... boris earns unlimited rewards for his small business. can i get the smith contract, please? thank you. that's three new paper shredders. [ boris ] put 'em on my spark card. [ garth ] boris' small business earns 2% cash back on every purchase every day. great businesses deserve unlimited rewards. read back the chicken's testimony, please. "buk, buk, bukka!" [ male announcer ] get the spark business card from capital one and earn unlimited rewards. choose 2% cash back or double miles on every purchase every day. told you i'd get half. what's in your wallet? "that starts with one of the world's most advancedy," told you i'd get half. distribution systems," "and one of the most efficient trucking networks," "with safe, experienced drivers." "we work directly with manufacturers," "eliminating costly markups," "and buy directly from local farmers in every region of the country." "when you see our low prices, remember the wheels turning behind the scenes, delivering for millions of americans, everyday. "dedication: that's the real walmart"

the math of retirement is different today.ek. money has to last longer. i don't want to pour over pie charts all day. i want to travel, and i want the income to do it. ishares incomes etfs. low cost and diversified. find out why nine out of ten large professional investors choose ishares for their etfs. ishares by blackrock. call 1-800-ishares for a prospectus, which includes investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. read and consider it carefully before investing. risk includes possible loss of principal.

energy efficient appliances. you can get a tax write off for those. a programmable thermostat, very smart, saves money. ♪ cash money sorry. i see you have allstate claim free rewards, for every year you don't have a claim, you'll get money off your home insurance policy. put it towards... [ glass shatters ] [ girl ] dad! dad! [ girl screams ] noise canceling headphones? [ nicole ] that's a great idea. [ male announcer ] home insurance that saves you money for not having a claim? that's allstate home insurance with claim free rewards. talk to an allstate agent... [ doorbell rings ] and let the good life in. today. there was a significant moment in the trial of george zimmerman charged with second degree murder in the killing of florida teenager trayvon martin. martin's friend enrachel jen tell took the stand. here she is today speaking about that phone call. >> he said, why are you

following me for? and i heard him a man saying wa you doing around here. i starred trayvon, at what's going on. and i heard a bump and i had a feeling it was a bump because trayvon had said -- then trayvon. i heard a little bit trayvon saying get off, get off. >> we turned to craig melvin following the case in sanford, florida, and legal analyst his lisa bloom. craig, what happened today of significance to the prosecution case? >> chris that, clip that you just played there was very significant. that's where they left off about 15 minutes ago. the defense attorney was trying to show that will there was a inconsistency between what rachel genteel said in her deposition and what she said in court. in her deposition, according to the defense attorney? she said it could be trayvon.

and today on the stand at one point she said it was certainly trayvon. that's where we left off today. we also left off about an hour and a half, she starred about 2:30. the prosecution solvent about an hour with her. then the defense spent about an hour 45 minutes including breaks and then at the end, when asked how much additional time they would need tomorrow with the 19-year-old, don west said, oh, a few hours. a couple of hours. at that point rachel genteel was visibly disgusted. she was visibly disgusted at a number of different points throughout her testimony. i talked to her attorney earlier today, a mime-based lawyer who identified himself as her attorney and he said that she would be a reluctant witness and a reluctant witness she was. there were a number of exchanges between her and the defense attorney when you could tell that she was not happy about being here. at one point, she asked him, are

you listening? are you listening to me? over and over again. and there were a couple of other pointed exchanges, as well. there were two things, two other things of note, chris. one thing they were prepared for, according to her defense attorney and that was that the lie she told about going to the hospital instead of going to the funeral for trayvon martin, instead of going to his wake. she said that she told that will lie because she did not want to upset sybrina fulton, his mother. she didn't want to the upset the martin family and came up with the lie about going to the hospital so she wouldn't make herself necessary look bad and make them feel bad, as well. that's what they were prepared for. the other thing the attorney did not mention to me at least was this idea she lied about her age to protect her privacy. at one point she admitted today in court she said she was 16 when in fact she's 18. she was 18 then. now she's 19. >> okay, thanks. we're going to keep up with this. we're going to bring in lisa

bloom. this is a six case. how do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed murder? second degree murder? how do you go about doing this. >> at the moment that george zimmerman pulled that trigger, was he reasonably in fear of great bodily injury or death in the prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was not in fear, that he did not act in self-defense and to get a second degree murder conviction they have to get the jury to say he acted with a depraved heart with reckless indifference to human life. >> meaning he just went out to shoot the call. >> that's right. that's why they bring the call in where he said these guys always get away with it to show and i in us. >> how do we get the truth when we only have one person living? >> that happens in every murder case. so it's a circumstantial case. what the prosecution is doing now is bringing in witnesses who can disproblem little pieces of

george zimmerman's statement because he cooperated with police. he gave a lengthy videotaped story of what happened that night. immediately. the following day. >> right away. he had no attempt to hide or to run. he just showed up and how do you it erpt that. >> that's to his credit. that's definitely a point for the defense that he immediately cooperated with the police. as soon as they came, he said i shot him. i did it. >> what about the thing i hear from a lot of friends that say he was told not to pursue him. we don't know exactly which direction he went. we know he got out of his car. >> his defense attorney has said, yes, did he follow him. the dispatcher said we don't need you to do that very careful language. he said i can't give spec instructions not to do it. it's not illegal to ignore a police dispatcher. if he had stayed at a safe dance, maybe this wouldn't have happened. >> i hope we get the truth. >> it's all about the evidence shows. >> thank you so much. craig thank you for your

reporting and lisa, thank you for the analysis. up next, darrell issa, talk about not telling the truth. now he says he never said the white house was behind the targeting of groups. how come there's a whole chorus of republicans following him and saying there's an enemies list at the white house and that malarky as biden would say? the so-called scandal he spent weeks hyping has turned out to be smoke. of this nixon wannabe ain't making it. you're watching "hardball," the place for politics. there is a pursuit we all share. a better life for your family, a better opportunity for your business,

a better legacy to leave the world. we have always believed in this pursuit, striving to bring insight to every investment, and integrity to every plan. we are morgan stanley. and we're ready to work for you. congestion, for it's smog. but there are a lot of people that do ride the bus. and now that the busses are running on natural gas, they don't throw out as much pollution to the earth. so i feel good. i feel like i'm doing my part to help out the environment.

it's the most powerful thing on the planet. love holds us in the beginning. comforts us as we grow old. love is the reason you care. for all the things in your life... that make life worth living. ♪ ♪ sweet love of mine

i'm eamon javers with occur market wrap. stocks rallied on wall street. the dow jumped 149, the s&p 500

added 15 and the knack up 28. rates on 30-year filmed mortgages are up to their highest level in nearly two years, rates jumped to an average of 4.46% last week. gold having a tough go, plummeting to its lowest level in nearly three years and apple shares closed down 1%, dropping below the $400 mark. that's it from cnbc in business worldwide. now back to "hardball." >> i've never said it came out of the office of the president or his campaign. what i've said is it comes out of wa ugh. >> what a zero. welcome back to "hardball." that guy's been shooting blanks for weeks now. white house enemies list, terms like that, a coordinated campaign to target conservatives. that's the perception of the controversy. republicans have seriously

created it. and that think in large part is due to the guy you just saw, the guy leading the investigation so-called darrell issa. the republican house oversight chairman has repeatedly attempted to link the white house to the irs targeting controversy. but his conspiracy theoriesry are nothing more than that have been debuchked by an ag report, and two transcripts from his own interviews and three, an internal report by the new irs chief with seemingly no evidence on his side, issa went on cnn yesterday in what first looked like an effort at daniel control. here he is in full backtrack mode talking to cnn's dana bash. >> i've never said it came out of the office of the president or his campaign. what i've said is it comes out of washington. >> and now more from the blunderbuss bs he's so good at. saying what he's trying to say here doesn't have to require any evidence. here he is with more in that same interview, pushing the old story. >> for years, the president bashed the tea party groups. he was very public against these

groups. and on his behalf, perhaps not on his request, on his behalf, the irs executed a delaying tactic against the very groups that he talked about. >> malarky on his behalf, perhaps on his behalf, no evidence. dana bash pressed him for evidence. take a look at their exchange now. >> do you have evidence of that based on the interviews you've done or you're just making an assumption. >> dana, you can close a case on what you don't know. you can only close a case on what you do know. >> in other words, guilty till proven innocent. elijah cull mings and dana pill bank. congressman, in all the times you've sat next to mr. issa at hearings, have you ever gotten the impression he thinks there was political hangy pankey here from the white house? >> yeah, i honestly don't know what he thinks. i mean, quite often he makes a lot of statements and then, and

these statements make headlines and then there's a search for the facts and in many instances, the facts are never found. and so i don't know what he thinks but i can tell you one thing that the interviews that have been conducted and the chairman knows this have shown no political involvement in this episode. no white house involvement whatsoever. and we know that it started in the cincinnati office. and it was started by a self-proclaimed republican, a conservative republican. and i think the thing that bothers me most, chris, is when these types of allegations are made and you have exculpatory evidence that shows clearly that it's not accurate, you ought to say something because we are in search of the truth. >> yeah. >> so that we can do reform so that we can then restore the

trust in the irs. you cannot get there unless you stay focused on the truth. and so when you throw out these statements that will are not supported by any evidence whatsoever, i don't think it does harm to the integrity not only of the committee, but to the congress. >> so now we know that the chairman of the investigating committee, darrell issa is now publicly saying he's never accused the white house or any of the campaign people, none of them as he claimed they're guilty. therefore you have to figure out all the interviews he's done show no evidence of that. then you go back to the question, how did this become part of the hit list of the gop propaganda machine? how come people have kept putting out the word this is part of the scandal? they talk about the irs scandal. issa said he never said the ir sa s was targeting coming out of the president's office but he has repeatedly made the connection. one is an interview with cbs, another with cnn.

>> how dare the administration imply they're going to get to the bottom of it. this was the targeting of the president's political enemies effectively and lies about it during the election year so that it wasn't discovered till afterwards. >> as you know, as late as last week, the administration is still trying to say there's a few rogue agents in cincinnati when in fact, the indication is they were directly being ordered from washington. >> dana, you're one of the great sat tirists of our time. i don't think you can satty rise the she's patrol he's been on. he never stops. he doesn't feel any shame about having no evidence. it's one thing to go after your political opponent. but when you realize you've got nothing, can you keep smearing them like this guy is doing? >> you know, chris, this committee as you know has a long history of shenanigans going back to chairman dan burton firing a bullet at a watermelon in the vince not ter case. even by those standards, issa

has been extraordinary. you said he's been firing blanks for weeks now. i would say a couple years. the congressman can correct me but i think he's at 10, 11, 12 major investigations into this administration. fast and furious, wikileaks, benghazi, solyndra, fannie mae. it goes on. of in each case he makes an outlandish suggestion this goes into the white house or the president's going after political enemies. he couched it with some sort of weasel word and then nothing comes of it. the problem is, he's in the congressman cummings should be delighted because chairman issa sacrificed his credibility. people in the press when they hear these allegations have to discount that. >> you've been pushing him to put all he's got, show your cards in a poker game. shows us the transcripts. is he going to do it? >> i don't know what he's going to do. but i can say one thing, chris.

you asked how did this get out of hand with all these other people repeating what the chairman has said? i think they thought, they just assumed when he said things like political enemies and whatever, that the president was involved, they assumed that he had evidence. people like chairman rogers and others and kemp and senator cruz. they assumed that had he some evidence. and so then they then took it another step and made all kinds of statements and the next thing you know, and sometimes i wonder if things are thrown out there hoping that it will stick and then when there's no evidence, people still are left with the same impression that what was said is true when in fact it's not. that's what concerns me. >> this is. >> that's about integrity of the committee. >> this is what nasty little high school boys and girls do on the internet. they send out nasty little stories about their friends, their enemies rather and they get away with it because once the stink bomb has been thrown it's hard to come back and get

rid of it. that's what this guy does. he throws around stink bombs. thank you. good luck with getting the truth. and dana milbank, thank you for joining us again. >> after yesterday's ruling on the voting rights act crushing it, states are moving to suppress the votes of people who tend to oat for democrats. look at mississippi, texas, alabama, they're going out now to suppress the black vote. this is "hardball," are the place for politics. [ female announcer ] made just a little sweeter...

because all these whole grains aren't healthy unless you actually eat them ♪ multigrain cheerios. also available in delicious peanut butter. healthy never tasted so sweet.

congressman edward markey won the special election last night in massachusetts. headed to the united states senate. he beat gab gabriel gomez by ten points. that margin is right in line with recent polling up there. he specs to be sworn in sometime after the july 4th recess. we'll be right back. alec, for this mission i upgraded your smart phone. ♪ right. but the most important feature of all is... the capital one purchase eraser. i can redeem the double miles i earned with my venture card to erase recent travel purchases. and with a few clicks, this mission never happened. uh, what's this button do? [ electricity zaps ] ♪

you requested backup? yes. yes i did. what's in your wallet? [ whirring ] [ dog barks ] i want to treat more dogs. ♪ our business needs more cases. [ male announcer ] where do you want to take your business? i need help selling art. [ male announcer ] from broadband to web hosting to mobile apps, small business solutions from at&t have the security you need to get you there. call us. we can show you how at&t solutions can help you do what you do... even better. ♪ in that time there've been some good days. and some difficult ones. but, through it all we've persevered, supporting some of the biggest ideas in modern history. so why should our history matter to you? because for more than two centuries, we've been helping ideas move

from ambition to achievement. ♪ and the next great idea could be yours. ♪ otherworldly things. but there are some things i've never seen before. this ge jet engine can understand 5,000 data samples per second. which is good for business. because planes use less fuel, spend less time on the ground and more time in the air. suddenly, faraway places don't seem so...far away. ♪ welcome back to "hardball." the supreme court's decision to ebtively demolish the voting rights akd yesterday has immediate effects that could disenfranchise voters. in texas where the voting rights act was enaced to prevent a

photo i.d. requirement, the attorney general said 13 about today's decision, the state's voter i.d. law will take effect immediately. in mississippi the same reaction. reaction. the state republican secretary of state said quote, the constitutional voter identification begins today. and in alabama, the supreme court's decision clears the way for which that state's new photo i.d. the alabama secretary of state said quote, photo voter i.d. will be the first process that we have gone through under this new ruling. clearly it's now become harder to vote in those states. that's just beginning. joining me now is co-director of the advancement project and msnbc contributor eugene robinson. gene, i want you to get in on this. here we go again. voting rights act nullified by the supreme court. and here we have all these states playing these games back in 2011 and 2012 under the fine

leadership of republican leader reince priebus are back at it again with no objection in terms of the supreme court or the voting rights act. >> yeah. what the court really has done in my view is take away the most effective weapon that the justice department had under the voting rights act to keep states from doing this sort of thing. from doing voter suppression. and just as eric holder has used preclearance to keep all sorts of bad things from happening. that's going to be harder now. there are still other remedies under the voting rights act but much more difficult, i think, to prevent these sorts of voter suppression efforts. >> what happens now if a state a egregious saying you have so much documentation. just wear people out. i'm not going to go to whatever office i have to go to or develop a paper trail.

i've been voting all my life. people know me at the voting station. does this wear voters out? >> this is an added burden for voters. especially for voters who are older. it's also a burden for students. it's a burden for anybody who doesn't have a driver's license or a passport which means people with lower incomes, less ability to move around and get to the driver's license authority. so what can happen is that either the department of justice or private groups such as advancement project on behalf of individuals in this state can sue under state law or under the other section of the voting rights act, section 2 which prohibits discrimination nationwide. but those lawsuits are expensive. there won't be nearly enough to do what the department of justice did which is monitor thousands and thousands of

voting changes every year. >> to what effect? able to act on the voting rights act. let's look at this one now. north carolina, the supreme court's decision has put booster rockets on a package already passed by the house of representatives there that will make it harder to vote. they plan to move next week on them. quote, require photo i.d.s at polls, eliminate same-day registration, cut early voting hours. do these seem to be areas early voting is a block phenomenon, i have been told that. these things seem so targeted. >> north carolina is a state that has been known to be moderate. i think it's a southern state where voters of color were starting to have a real impact. and this set of laws especially to cut back on early voting and taking away sunday voting which is known as souls to the polls in the african-american community. and north carolina's tremendous

innovation of allowing registration during the early voting period. all of those mechanisms were used more heavily by african-american voters. and in fact, president obama carried north carolina in 2008. not on election day, but during the early voting period. >> well, let me look at this, gene. the only good news here is in the 2012 election for the first time in census history, black voters turned out over whites. 66.2% cast ballots this past year. 64.1% of eligible non-hvrpz whites cast ballots. that's down from 66%. when there is an african-american candidate for president, the black percentage of political activism has beaten the whites. this is the first. i'm not sure it's an enduring pattern, but it did happen for the first time. >> that's kind of the question, chris. there's anecdotal evidence that

i've picked up that all this voter suppression activity or these attempts actually help motivate black voters in a lot of places that say they're not going to do that to me. and brought people out to the polls. big question is to whether in a midterm election when you don't have the presidency at stake and when you don't have barack obama running on top of the ticket, can you get a black vote that exceeds or equals the percentage of white vote? but we'll see. i think it'll be very interested -- >> the guy against the machine, you know? how long can you fight the courts and keep winning? i hope they do. i hope you do. thank you penda hair and gene. we'll be right back after this. itching for relief? preparation h offers the most maximum strength solutions for all hemorrhoid symptoms. from the brand doctors recommend most. preparation h. don't stand for hemorrhoids.

"that starts with one of the world's most advancedy," from the brand doctors recommend most. distribution systems," "and one of the most efficient trucking networks," "with safe, experienced drivers." "we work directly with manufacturers," "eliminating costly markups," "and buy directly from local farmers in every region of the country." "when you see our low prices, remember the wheels turning behind the scenes, delivering for millions of americans, everyday. "dedication: that's the real walmart"

and didn't know where to start. a contractor before at angie's list, you'll find reviews on everything from home repair to healthcare written by people just like you. no company can pay to be on angie's list, so you can trust what you're reading. angie's list is like having thousands of close neighbors, where i can go ask for personal recommendations. that's the idea. before you have any work done, check angie's list. find out why more than two million members count on angie's list. angie's list -- reviews you can trust. i love you, angie. sorry, honey. ♪ now you can give yourself a kick in the rear! v8 v-fusion plus energy. natural energy from green tea plus fruits and veggies. need a little kick? ooh! could've had a v8. in the juice aisle.

yeah? then how'd i get this... [ voice of dennis ] ...safe driving bonus check? every six months without an accident, allstate sends a check. silence. are you in good hands? silence. foour neighbors.... and our communities... america's beverage companies have created... a wide range of new choices. developing smaller portion sizes and more.. low and no-calorie beverages... adding clear calorie labels so you know... exactly what you're choosing... and in schools, replacing full-calorie soft drinks... with lower-calorie options. with more choices and fewer calories... america's beverage companies are delivering.

let me finish tonight with this. the thing about america that always gives me hope is the way we're able to grow. we didn't always recognize same-sex marriage as the majority of the american people do today. we didn't always say it was not okay to put up white-only signs at restaurants and gas station restrooms. we didn't always think it was unconstitutional to deny the black man and woman the right to vote. we didn't always condemn slavery. we didn't always have men as well as women participate in our elections. we've changed and become better. today a large battle was won. when you hear the celebration

tonight, think of where it is being celebrated quietly. in the young girl or boy who now feels so much more to be okay in the eyes of all of us. of the lonely soul who now feels he or she belongs. that's "hardball" for now. thanks for being with us. "politicsnation" with al sharpton starts right now. thanks, chris. and thanks to you for tuning in. big news tonight. a majority victory for gay rights from the supreme court. just a day after the decision to gut the voting rights act. we'll talk later in the show about both rulings and the way forward for justice in this country. but we start with today's riveting testimony in george zimmerman's second degree murder trial. the young woman who was the last person to speak to trayvon martin took the stand. she was on the phone with him just moments b