the democratic party. there is a big thing right there. go on offend. >> because if you look at the polling, 75% of people in this country think we already have those protections. >> karen finney you can catch her show disrupt. thank you. that is all for this evening. the rachel maddow show starts now. >> good evening, chris. happy friday. thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. there is a russian ship called the nikolai cheeker cruising around off the eastern coast of florida right now as we speak. it is a russian flagged vessel, it was built in finland apparently. it's a tough little ship. an ocean going tug and for the last few days it seems it has been cruising around just off the east coast of florida. and what it is doing there, it's not illegal, but what it is doing their is raising some eyebrows given the status of things between russia and the united states right now. and, what it is doing there, at

least what it seems to be doing there, at least to me, it's kind of a surprising thing. and i think it has something to do with ronald reagan. one of the underappreciated things about the weirdness of the ronald reagan presidency is how much ronald reagan as president liked to talk about space aliens. not like just in casual conversation. he brought it up at the united nations. >> i occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. >> everybody in the united nations is like, did he just say that? i'm going to wait for the translation. i think he was just talking about -- and that wasn't the only time he ever did that. that was the united states in september 1987. president reagan also really riffed on the idea of a space alien invasion when he was speaking to a group of students in maryland in december 1985.

>> i couldn't help at one point in my discussions with privately with general secretary gorbachev, when you stop to think, we're all god's children wherever we may live in the world, i couldn't help but say to him, just think how easy his task and mine might be in these meetings that we held if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet outside in the universe. we'd forget all of the local differences that we have between our countries. and we would find out once and for all that we really are all human beings here on this earth together. well, i don't suppose we can wait for some alien race to come down and threaten us. but i think that between us, we can bring about that realization. thank you all, god bless you all. >> high school kids are like,

what's he talking about? too bad we cannot wait for the alien invasion, much as we might all long for the space invaders to actually get here. ronald reagan was sometimes a little weird when he openly hoped for a space invasion in multiple speeches. but sometimes, when president ronald reagan talked about space, it was less weird. it was not only less weird it was prescient, it was on point and may have led to that creepy russian tug sitting off the coast of miami right now. this is from ronald reagan's stooun address in 1984. watch this. >> we can reach for greatness again. we can follow our greems to distant stars living and works in space for peaceful economic and scientific gain. tonight, i am directing nasa to develop a permanently manned space station, and to do it within a decade. nasa will invite other countries to participate so we can strengthen peace, build prosperity and expand freedom for all who share our goals.

just as the oceans opened up a new world for clipper ships and yankee traders, space holds enormous potential for commerce today. we'll soon implement a number of executive initiatives, develop proposals to ease regulatory constraints, and with nasa's help, promote private sector investment in space. >> private sector investment in space. that time, in the state of the union, president reagan was able to hold back from wishing that space aliens would invade the earth. but what he was describing, 30 years ago now, in that speech, it has come to pass. there is a permanently or at least semipermanently manned space station orbiting the earth right now. just as ronald reagan said there should be. it took more than a decade to get there but we did get one. and it is international. like he said. it's called the international space station. it used to be that russia and the united states, we would each do our own versions of space stations. if you're old enough to remember

skylab that was the american space station that they let crash back into the atmosphere in 1979. nasa said they didn't exactly know where it was going to land. so at the time, people like drew targets on stuff and they wore t-shirts with targets on them. somebody marketed aerosol cans in 1979 labeled skylab repellent. ultimately skylab crashed down in remote australia and there is apparently still some sort of gray market in skylab bits and bobs that made it to earth that you can traffic in in the gray market. the russians last space station was called mir. they let that one crash to earth in 2001. everybody was worried it was going to land on a shopping mall. mir splashed down into the ocean before providing quite a light show in the south pacific. now just like ronald reagan said in 1984 even though the cold war was still raging at the time, now the future that he predicted has come to pass where there aren't individual countries anymore maintaining stations in

space, there is now an international space station. and there are astronauts up there, 200 or 300 miles up there right now, all of the time, working on stuff. here's the problem, though. if where you work is the international space station, turns out you have a terrible, terrible commute. when we still had the space shuttle program, that was one of the ways that we could get astronauts and stuff to and from the international space station. the space shuttle was a truly majestic and amazing aircraft, but honestly some of its last missions involved the necessary but sort of undignified task of just hauling dirty stuff and trash home from the international space station. those vehicles could come up. they could come back. they brought people and cargo there and they brought people and cargo back. now, though, we don't have the space shuttle anymore. the space shuttle program was retired in 2011 and so now, how does the united states maintain our presence on this far away permanently manned international space station if we've got no

vehicle to get our people and our stuff on and off of it? turns out, we depend on the russians. we killed the space shuttle here but they did not kill the soyuz. so for $71 million per seat, the russians agree to fly american astronauts, as well as cargo, back and forth to the international space station. $71 million a seat. russia is the only country in the world that maintains that capacity right now to transport stuff in and out of space. and we pay russia to use that capacity which only they have. except maybe now not for long. what happened today in florida is something else that ronald reagan talked about in that state of the union address in 1984 where he announced that he wanted to build this international space station program. at the end of those remarks he said there would eventually not just be countries, but companies doing private commerce, private business in space. and today in florida, a company

called space-x sent up its own private launch of a vehicle called dragon. which is delivering cargo up to the international space station. bringing up a whole bunch of stuff that the astronauts on the space station are going to use for experimenting on growing plants in space, and ways to communicate between the space station and ground control back here on earth. they also on this trip, they're bringing this guy some legs, i'm not kidding. this is a robot that they use on the space station right now called robo naut, or r2 for short. one of the things that went up on the space-x today is a pair of legs for him. he's up there light now and they just mounted him to a pedestal. he's just a little torso, and head and arms. but once this pay load that launched today out of florida gets there they're going to be able to stick some legs onto him. they shipped his legs, and if this promo shot is any indication his legs are going to be sticking out at weird angles

and it's going to be creepy. for now space-x and other private ventures, they can be used to ferry cargo, such as for example robot legs, they can be used to ferry cargo up to the space station. but these private companies can't be used to transport people to and from the space station. not yet. they can't do that yet but it's not going to be long. and that brings us back to the mysterious russian tugboat off the coast of florida today. because the russians like, they really like that they've got a monopoly on being able to transport people in and out of space. they have a global monopoly on that. and that's in part why they can charge $71 million a seat if you want to catch a ride with them. if somebody else develops that capability now, well russia will lose that monopoly and they will lose all that money. so nbc news space analyst reports today that the russian interest in the space-x program that had its most recent launch in florida, he reports that

their interest in the space-x program is, quote, intense. he says they realize that this project threatens russia's rocket monopoly. once the space-x dragon goes operational with crew, with people on board, there is no other russian space flight service that anyone in the world will have any commercial interest in. russia could be left behind and on the ground 73 so today, as space-x launched its dragon thing there off the coast of florida, lurking in international waters but very close by, was this ship. the "nikolai chicer" that russian ocean going tug that specializes in quote underwater search and rescue and salvage. oh. so just in case something went wrong with this launch that the russians are so interested in, wouldn't mind being here to pick up the pieces and have a little look-see with whatever falls into the sea. now, nobody is explaining what exactly that russian ship was doing off the coast of florida

today. but what it feels like from all the evidence is that they were basically there to sort of be a peeping tom to be there just in case something went wrong, especially for this next phase of american space flight because they really don't want this next phase of american space flight to work. they want american astronauts to have to trek out to kazakhstan and get into a russian vehicle and hand over a suitcase full of $71 million every time we want to send an american into space. it must be a particular delight to russian president vladimir putin right now that in the middle of the standoff that he's having with the rest of the world and the united states and the eu, wielding sanctions against russian officials who are very close to him, a key russian bank that's run by one of vladimir putin's very close friends with all these threats from the west against the russian economy and the toll these sanctions have already taken on the russian economy it must be a delight of galactic proportions to vladimir putin right now that in the middle of all that going on right now, globally, nasa just had to send

russia a check for $458 million. because we're dependent on them to access the space station. and we've got astronauts up there. the u.s. just renewed a contract to send six more u.s. astronauts to and from the space station on a russian vehicle at the cost of nearly $500 million. and so, while we are sanctioning russia in all of these other ways, we have also just sent them $500 million. and that makes for a very awkward head line today in "the washington post." on the same day that the u.s. national security adviser is in the white house briefing room warning russia that its economy is going to take a big hit unless they stop what they've been doing in ukraine. >> we have been very clear that we are ready, along with our partners, to impose additional costs. in the event of a dramatic escalation or a significant escalation, including as we've said repeatedly, the potential for russia to move its own

forces on the border inside of ukraine, that those costs and sanctions could even include targeting very significant sectors of the russian economy. >> that phrase at the end there, very significant sectors of the russian economy, that's actually just a nickname that diplomats use when what they really mean to say is oil and grass. oil and gas is what the russian economy is. and as undercutting and weird as it is for the u.s. government to have to hand russia a check for $500 million for rides on its spaceships at the same time that we're sanctioning their top officials and telling them how much we're going to hurt them economically, as undercutting as that is to be happening all at the same time consider that also today on the same day that the national security adviser to the president of the united states is at the white house threatening that unless russia backs off from ukraine, their oil and gas sector is going to get it, right around the time that she was saying that today,

do you want to know what vladimir putin was doing? he was at home. he was hanging out at home with the head of shell oil. the head of royal dutch shell today went to vladimir putin's house. in the middle of the united states and the european union threatening sanctions against the russian oil and gas sector the head of shell oil went to vladimir putin's house today to promise mr. putin eye-to-eye and to promise the world that royal dutch shell is quote committed to expansion in russia, quote, we are very keen to grow our position in the russian federation. shell oil today announcing plans to expand russia's liquefied natural gas plant with the russian state-owned company gazprom. within the last two weeks as the united states and european union have levied these sanctions against russia as president obama has signed an executive order giving himself the authority to at least theoretically lay sanctions against the russian energy sector, not only did we have this action from shell today at

vladimir putin's house, we also had exxon mobil announce that they were starting new joint work with the russian state owned oil company rosneft. they're starting surveys of the sea floor where they want to drill with rosneft in the arctic. the oil company bp has more than a third of all of its oil and gas reserves in russia. more than a third. bp's chief executive hold shareholders this month that bp's investment in russia is so large and so important that the company thinks that maybe it, as a company, can be important bridge between russia and the west, in trying to iron out these little difficulties with the ukraine situation. hi, we're bp. we're here to help. as of yesterday, the president of the united states has called the tens of thousands of russian troops amassed on the ukrainian border a gesture of intimidation. he's insisted that they must go. russian president vladimir putin says that he has received permission from his own parliament for those troops to, in fact, use force in ukraine if

vladimir putin wants them to. president putin has also started calling parts of ukraine novo russia. calling parts of ukraine, new russia. and the diplomatic deal signed yesterday in geneva which committed pro-russian militant groups to retreating from the government buildings they've been occupying in ukraine that diplomatic agreement may have been signed by ukraine and by russia and the united states but the guy who says he's the head of those pro-russian militants occupying those government buildings in ukraine, today he said well he doesn't consider himself to be bound by that agreement and his actions were kind of the most important ones that it was about. so it felt like a hope for a diplomatic breakthrough, now it does not necessarily feel like it is going to do much on the ground. the people who you were most looking for action as a response to that agreement say they don't feel bound by it. with all of this going on, the supposed trump card for the rest of the world in stopping russia from annexing more territory of a sovereign country, at least

theoretically the sword of damocles is that the west is supposed to be able to hang over russia's head is to cut off russia's oil and gas sector from the rest of the world. is that even remotely a real threat, though? honestly. is the united states government, the governments of the european union nations, are any institutions of governments capable of telling these giant multinational oil companies what to do? i meanwhile we've been rattling this supposed economic saber at russia, don't do it we'll cut off your oil and gas sector, shell oil was literally at putin's house today. cuddling. saying they couldn't wait to do more business with russia. well who's going to tell them otherwise? and if the oil business, if these companies, these oil and gas companies are honestly more powerful than any one country or any group of countries trying to tell them what to do, well then what? by russia creating a huge national oil company and a huge national gas company, did russia

make themselves too big to fail in diplomatic terms? joining us now is p.j. crowley, former u.s. assistant secretary of state for public affairs. thank you very much for being with us. >> hello, rachel. >> on that diplomatic matter yesterday, the deal signed yesterday and the militants on 9 ground ee sectionly saying they don't feel like they are bound by that agreement i see that as a very ominous statement about that agreement. should i see it that way. >> it is definitely raising risk. it's one thing to come up with a reasonable package in geneva. it's another thing to change facts on the ground. this is going to take time. i think the white house is right to say this is going to unfold over days, and perhaps weeks. >> everybody says that targeting rush sla's energy sector, because their economy is so energy dependent, that that's really the one way that the rest of the world can truly wield influence over russia. they don't worry about international embarrassment, they don't worry about some of the international standing issues that a lot of western

countries used to think they worried about. energy, oil and gas is really it. that really the way that you can move them if you need to. is that a myth, is that a lever that's not actually available to the west? >> well i think it is a lever that's available but not necessarily right away. obviously russia does provide a great deal of energy to ukraine obviously, but also to europe. you know, so perhaps weaning europe off of its reliance on russian energy is something that we can do, obviously the united states now has a energy card that can it play as the leading energy exporter in the world, but it's going to take a decade to help with that transition. so the dilemma is that, yes, the sanctions can play a role. they tend to do that over time not necessarily right away. >> thought experiment. let's say the united states and germany and all the eu nations

were either because of something very bad that russia did, or because of some magic wand has been waved and europe isn't all that dependent on russian oil and gas anymore, we were able to come to some agreement among all these different western groups that russia's oil and gas sector shoulden sanctioned. that gazprom and rosneft should be cut off. how would exxon, shell, bp, the other giant multinational oil and gas companies try to wield influence with the u.s. government about a policy matter like that? >> i mean, even in the, two or three rounds of sanctions that have gone on so far, you've sanctioned individuals that are from rosneft, and it makes it a complicated arrangement in terms of doing business with exxon mobile, doing business with bp. it doesn't mean you can't do it but obviously that's something that can become more difficult, and, you know, i think for shell it has to think about its reputational risk of, you know, being seen, you know, in russia

in the middle of the crisis. and shell has to be careful, because obviously, you know, the president has said i'm prepared to do more and as you do more, the deeper that shell gets in to this partnership, it could end up losing money, leaving money on the table. so i think this can again play over time. right now people are still doing business, you know, with russia. but it has to be clear-eyed in terms of what the prospects are and we'll see in the coming days whether russia actually now asserts itself, you know, to try to de-escalate this. they could. and they may not. >> i had a -- i had a different idea about what the companies might think about their as you describe it their reputational risk here before i saw shell at putin's house today. he didn't have to do it at his house, you're trying to distance yourself from what he's doing as a leader of russia right now. i thought it was just a

remarkable decision. let me ask you about one other unrelated argument, this report in "the washington post" that the u.s. is going to be announcing a deployment of new ground troops to poland in response to events in ukraine. what is the significance of that? should we see that as an american escalation? >> i don't think so. i mean the president's been clear that he does not see a military dimension, you know, to this, has even been reluctant to provide lethal assistance to ukraine, providing some nonlethal askistance. i think this is a clear and significant message to the nato partners in central and eastern europe particularly poland, and the baltic states that we -- are willing to put real resources on the ground, you know, to reassure, and to protect nato's interests. obviously, it can send a signal to putin that two can play this game. you want to amass troops on this border we'll mass troops on that border but i think it's primarily an ongoing effort to reassure nato allies closest to

ukraine, we have your back. >> p.j. crowley former assistant sect for public affairs. thank you very much for your time tonight. nice to see you. thank you. >> we'll be right back, stay with us. we've got a doozy for the interview tonight. [ dog barks ] ♪ [ male announcer ] imagine the cars we drive... being able to see so clearly... to respond so intelligently and so quickly, they can help protect us from a world of unseen danger. it's the stuff of science fiction... minus the fiction. and it is mercedes-benz... today. see your authorized dealer for exceptional offers through mercedes-benz financial services. add vanishing deductible from nationwide insurance and get $100 off for every year of safe driving. we put members first. join the nation. ♪ nationwide is on your side

we did a 27-point inspection on your chevy,ce, you got new tires and our price match guarantee. who's this little guy? that's birney. oh, i bet that cone gives him supersonic hearing. watch what you say around him. i've been talking a lot about his procedure... (whispering)

what? get our everyday price match guarantee plus a $100 rebate on 4 select tires from your tire experts. chevy certified service. they don't know it yet, but they're gonna fall in love, get married, have a couple of kids, [ children laughing ] move to the country, and live a long, happy life together where they almost never fight about money. [ dog barks ] because right after they get married, they'll find some financial folks who will talk to them about preparing early for retirement and be able to focus on other things, like each other, which isn't rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade. okay this is a story of forgiveness. this is an almost hard to believe story of forgiveness. seven years ago, a young man 18 years old was taking a walk in a bazaar in northern iran, and he bumped in to this man.

in the bazaar. a man whose first name is billal. one man bumping into another turned into a fight, then turned into a brawl and then bilal pulled a knife out of his sock and with that knife he killed the young man who he bumped into. bilal was caught, he was arrested, he was tried and convicted. he was sentenced to death by public hanging. under some interpretations of sharia law in that part of iran, in a case like this the victim's family is allowed to participate in the public execution. and i mean literally participate in the execution. they're not just supposed to show up and watch. bilal was sentenced to be hanged out in public in front of a crowd. members of the victim's family were supposed to kick the claire from under his feet to hang him. executions are a fairly common occurrence in iran. iran is second only to china in terms of the raw numbers of people reported to be put to death by their own government. for a lot of countries though obviously nobody really trusts the reported numbers.

iran officially reported 369 executions last year. but amnesty international estimates that the number could probably be more like twice that. that would have iran killing its prisoners at a rate of about two per day. but it was this week, seven years after that encounter at the bazaar that turned into a fight that turned into a fatal stabbing, it was this week in northern iran, when bilal was due to be hanged for that crime. according to multiple press accounts, most citing an iranian student news agency, bilal was brought to the gallows, crying and screaming. and the family members of the man who he killed, they were called up to confront him and, of course, to participate in his punishment. to kick the chair out from under his feet, and thereby hang him. but then something sort of incredible happened. the victim's mother approached bilal and he has the noose around his neck.

she approached him, shouted at him about the death of her son, she slapped bilal across the face. and she stopped and she told the assembled crowd that that was what she needed to be able to do and she forgive him. and she along with her husband removed the noose from his neck and thereby spared his life. her husband said a few days before the scheduled hanging this week she had had a dream in which her dead son came to her and said to her in the dream that he is at peace and he asked her not to retaliate. this is the mother of the victim and the mother of her son's killer who she just spared, crying together after this happened. those incredible pictures, and that story were featured in "the washington post" today as well as going the guardian" newspaper in london this week. and that story of forgiveness is not just amazing on its own terms it is also very newly relevant to a decision that is happening right now in this country, a decision that right now is an absolute 50/50 tie. and that story and the interview tonight are next. stay with us.

all stations come over to mission a for a final go.

this is for real this time. step seven point two one two. verify and lock. command is locked. five seconds. three, two, one. standing by for capture. the most innovative software on the planet... dragon is captured. is connecting today's leading companies to places beyond it. siemens. answers. there was a boy who traveled to a faraway place where castles were houses and valiant knights stood watch for the kingdom was vast and monsters lurked in the deep and the good queen showed the boy it could all be real avo: all of great britain, all in one place book on expedia before april 30th and save up to thirty percent.

that corporate trial by fire when every slacker gets his due. and yet, there's someone around the office who hasn't had a performance review in a while. someone whose poor performance is slowing down the entire organization. i'm looking at you phone company dsl. go to comcastbusiness.com/ checkyourspeed. if we can't offer faster speeds or save you money we'll give you $150. comcast business built for business. after police officer michael briggs was shot and killed in the line of duty his fellow officers lined up in the rain for the chance to honor him. michael briggs was 35 years old. he served on the force in manchester, new hampshire. he had a wife and two kids. his 8-year-old son told reporters at the time that their dad, quote, tried to spend as much time as he could with us. even if he had a second left he'd spend it with us. officer michael briggs served on

the bike patrol in manchester, new hampshire. and just before 2:00 a.m. on october 16th, 2006, officer briggs and his partner pedalled over to a call about a domestic disturbance, possible gunshots fired. that turned into an alley off lincoln street in manchester, new hampshire, and in the dark of that alley they confronted a suspect. officer briggs ordered the suspect to shot. instead the suspect drew a gun and shot the officer at close range in the head. michael briggs died at the hospital the next day. hundreds of police officers turned out from everywhere in dress uniform for his funeral. his partner officer john breckenridge who had been with him that night in the alley in manchester, john breckenridge gave the eulogy for his partner at the funeral. it's a reliable standard among american law enforcement officers that when a fellow officer is injured or killed that officer's colleagues never stop pushing for justice to be done. they show up. the suspect in this case was captured in massachusetts, which is just one state over from new

hampshire when he was arraigned there in massachusetts, officers from manchester, new hampshire, filled the benches at the courthouse. when the trial began, michael briggs' partner officer john breckenridge, he took the stand, and he went through the painful story of riding up to that alley, and seeing his partner shot and killed at such close range. the trial ended with a conviction for capital murder and a sentence of death. and with that sentence new hampshire's death row population went from zero to one. across the years of legal wrangling that inevitably following the guilt of new hampshire's lone death row inmate has not seriously been in doubt. but some of the people of new hampshire have begun to doubt what the state should do in response to his crime. regardless of what any criminal does in any crime, should it be one of the jobs of state government to take prisoners out of their cells, and kill them on purpose? 18 states have repealed their death penalty. six of those states have

repealed it in just the past six years. the death penalty is not as popular as it used to be. the trend in the states right now is to get rid of it. even before that shocking murder of that police officer in that new hampshire alley in 2006 lawmakers in new hampshire were already periodically voting on whether or not new hampshire should repeal its death penalty. in 2000, both houses of the legislature voted for repeal. but the governor at the time, jeanne shaheen, vetoed it, left the death penalty in place. in 2009 the house voted for repeal but the senate wouldn't go along with it. by that time the man who killed michael briggs was on death row in new hampshire. and officer briggs' partner john breckenridge would soon testify to a state panel against getting rid of capital punishment. a few months ago activists in new hampshire started again trying to push for a repeal. the fight was led by a state lawmakers whose own father and brother-in-law had both been murdered. last month the giant new

hampshire house voted to repeal the death penalty by more than two to one, democrats control that chamber but the vote in the house was very bipartisan with support from lawmakers who have talked openly about having changed their minds on this issue. explaining how they evolved from supporting the death penalty in the past to now just being unable to justify it any longer. that vote in the house in new hampshire was two to one, never sentenced -- never to sentence anybody to death in new hampshire ever again. that was the house. it's a very big body in new hampshire. the senate is much smaller. and yesterday the much smaller new hampshire state senate also considered the issue. manchester's police chief and assistant police chief looked on from the tiny balcony in the state senate, you can find lawmakers from each party on each side of the question. the chamber was divided and in the end they were divided evenly. the vote was 12-12 in the senate on the bill to repeal the death penalty. and in new hampshire if you can only get to a tie, the bill fails. so repealing the death penalty failed in new hampshire this

week for lack of one vote. it was 12-12. for the activists in new hampshire this marks their third oh, so close attempt at ending capital punishment in that state. third attempt in not that many years. they got really close in 2000. they got really close in 2009. and they just got really close again. but this time it is also different. because just as some lawmakers have changed their minds over time and gone from supporting the death penalty to wanting it repealed this time. so did someone very unexpected this time. this former manchester police officer john breckenridge, who was michael briggs' partner, and who was with him in that alley the night that officer briggs was killed. john breckenridge, the same officer who had so passionately testified for the death penalty in part because of what he had seen happened to his partner, he now says he has changed his mind. officer breckenridge has explained for him the decision to support repealing the death penalty is a return to religious

faith, he's catholic, it's rooted in trying to recover from his grief and his rage and part of that recovery, he says, meant giving up the idea that the man who murdered his partner should also be killed. he says, quote, that's where my journey brought me. do i want to visit michael addison or invite him into my home? i do not. do i occasionally pray for him and his family? i do. the interview tonight is john breckenridge. stay with us. (vo) you are a business pro. maestro of project management. baron of the build-out. you need a permit... to be this awesome. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle... and go.

and only national is ranked highest in car rental customer satisfaction by j.d. power. (aaron) purrrfect. (vo) meee-ow, business pro. meee-ow. go national. go like a pro.

♪ ♪

abe! get in! punch it! let quicken loans help you save your money. with a mortgage that's engineered to amaze! thanks, g. [ girl ] my mom, she makes underwater fans that are powered by the moon. ♪ she can print amazing things, right from her computer. [ whirring ] [ train whistle blows ] she makes trains that are friends with trees. ♪ my mom works at ge. ♪ and that's epic, bro, we've forgotten just how good good is.

good is setting a personal best before going for a world record. good is swinging to get on base before swinging for a home run. [ crowd cheering ] good is choosing not to overshoot the moon, but to land right on it and do some experiments. ♪ so start your day off good with a coffee that's good cup after cup. maxwell house. ♪ good to the last drop that would be my daughter -- hi dad. she's a dietitian. and back when i wasn't eating right,

she got me drinking boost. it's got a great taste, and it helps give me the nutrition i was missing. helping me stay more like me. [ female announcer ] boost complete nutritional drink has 26 essential vitamins and minerals, including calcium and vitamin d to support strong bones and 10 grams of protein to help maintain muscle. all with a delicious taste. grandpa! [ female announcer ] stay strong, stay active with boost. all the way up to 2006, my partner was murdered in front of me. after that happens, the anger i had very naturally i think spilled out to i wanted to see his killer die. i was mad at myself i hadn't killed him that night. i wanted to see this guy pay and that's the way it was going to be. >> that's john breckenridge, now retired police officer who saw his partner officer michael

briggs killed in the line of duty in manchester, new hampshi hampshire. since the murder mr. breckenridge has gone from being a confirmed supporter of the death penalty to being an outspoken opponent. six states have repealed the death penalty in the past six years. new hampshire this week very nearly became the seventh. in new hampshire this week the repeal effort for that state's death penalty failed for lack of one vote in the state senate. there's word that they may try again before this legislative session is out. joining us now for the interview tonight is retired manchester police officer john breckenridge. mr. breckenridge. thank you very much for being with us tonight. i really appreciate your being willing to talk with us about the subject. >> thank you for having me. >> can you tell me a little bit more, tell us a little bit more about you changing your mind, the transformation that you -- that you had from your initial views on the death penalty after your partner was killed to how you feel about it now? >> it's really a simple answer, actually.

as a christian i have to respect the dignity and the value of human life. and that counts even for people who do horrible things. i just -- i can't be part of when this person is going to be executed years after the event. it's not in the heat of the moment. like i said, as a christian i have to respect life. i have to stand up for it. and as i said i just can't do what i see is not revenge and support the death penalty. >> the vote to repeal the death penalty in new hampshire this week it came really, really close. the repeal vote was very strong in the house and then in the senate, it ended up dying an a 12-12 vote because it was so close and part of that for some word that they might try again which doesn't make sense unless you think that people are continuing to evolve on the subject, that people continue to change on the subject, that people are susceptible to hearing new arguments. do you -- do you think that's true that people do -- i mean not just yourself, but that you've seen other people evolve

and that you think other people could change their mind on this? >> i really think so. i think it's an issue a lot of people don't spend a lot of time considering. for me i never really did until it became very personal. and prior to that i hadn't given it much thought. i had a knee-jerk response. so yeah, i'm for it, i suppose. initially there was lots of anger and naturally as you'd expect and i was very much for it. but, once i was able to let go of the anger and calm down and give it the thought it deserved i was able to change my opinion. i know a lot of people that haven't changed and probably won't. but i mean, my personal journey, that's what it was. >> has it been hard for you because you were obviously such a figure of public interest in this case because of what happened with your partner, because you had spoken in favor of the death penalty, earlier, has it been hard for you to have publicly changed your mind on this? have you had trouble with your former colleagues or has it been difficult? >> most people have been very

respectful. a lot of my former coworkers, they've actually told me, hey, i'm on the same side as you. most of the ones that we disagree with, they'll tell me, you know, we can disagree, i still respect your opinion, you have a right to think the way you do think. and you know, it's been a very respectful sort of contact with my former coworkers. >> when you -- >> so it's been good. >> when you've talked about it publicly when you've obviously you've advocated that new hampshire does get rid of the death penalty. what do you find is an effective argument? what do you think moves people on this subject? >> that's just the thing about this. there's everyone kind of has a different push button for them. a lot of people look at the cost, like for example addison's case, is expected to cost around $8 million. would be less than a million typically if it was a life in prison without parole case. other people look at things like deterrence.

there's numerous studies that say it's not a deterrent. some that say it is. personally i don't believe it is. and a lot of people just look at the moral side of it. is to kill someone, in the heat of the moment is one thing and years later, premeditated by the state is something else. another personal one for me was i met a man who was cleared by dna, it wasn't just that the court didn't follow the procedure. this man actually was innocent and was on death row, and that was kirk bloodsworth, very interesting man. i met him probably a year, year and a half ago but that was clearly a wrongful conviction. a man who would have been executed for a crime he was innocent of. >> john breckenridge, retired manchester police officer who has been your personal transition on this story i think has been a lot of the story of how people have understood how new hampshire has come so close to changing its own mind as a state on this issue. thanks for helping us understand your state of mind on this, sir. thanks for being here. >> great. thank you very much. >> thank you. we'll be right back. stay with us.

>> sdo you remember the creepy guy who leaned over me fake voting in wisconsin. same guy. this time he know it creepy. i know you can tell this. imagine you are the park you. are single, a nice day. perhaps spring.

friendly person, shows up at the park. there is flirting. there is maybe a proposition. your new pal asks if you would look to go home with him. you say yes. i would. let's go. now, that may not be your style. you may prefer to take it slow. you may not dig him. but imagine this. is that interaction that you just had in the park -- illegal? is it illegal to flirt with somebody and agree to go home with them? is that illegal? turns out it depend on what part of louisiana you are in. that story is coming up next. you won't believe it. stay with us. c'mon, you want heartburn? when your favorite food starts a fight, fight back fast, with tums. heartburn relief that neutralizes acid on contact. and goes to work in seconds. ♪ tum, tum tum tum... tums!

all stations come over to mithis is for real this time. step seven point two one two. verify and lock. command is locked. five seconds. three, two, one. standing by for capture. the most innovative software on the planet... dragon is captured. is connecting today's leading companies to places beyond it. siemens. answers. cozy or cool?

"meow" or "woof"? exactly the way you want it ... until boom, it's bedtime! your mattress is a battleground of thwarted desire. enter the all-new sleep number classic series. designed to let couples sleep together in individualized comfort. starting at just $699.99 for a queen mattress. he's the softy. his sleep number setting is 35. you're the rock, at 60. and snoring? sleep number's even got an adjustment for that. find your sleep number setting only at a sleep number store. know better sleep with sleep number. who gets the allstate safe driving bonus check. rock beats scissors! [ chuckles ] wife beats rock. and with two checks a year, everyone wins. [ female announcer ] switch today and get two safe driving bonus checks a year for driving safely. only from allstate. call 866-906-8500 now. [ dennis ] zach really loves his new camera. problem is...this isn't zach. it's a friend of a friend who was at zach's party and stole his camera. but zach's got it covered... with allstate renters insurance. [ female announcer ] protect your valuables for as low as $4 a month when you add renters insurance to your allstate auto policy. call 866-906-8500 now.

what are you doing? we're switching car insurance. why? because these guys are the cheapest. why? good question. because a cut-rate price could mean cut-rate protection. you should listen to this guy. [ female announcer ] with allstate you get great protection and a great price, plus an agent! drivers who switched saved an average of $498 a year. call now and see how much you can save. just a few more ways allstate is changing car insurance for good. [ female announcer ] call an allstate agent and get a quote now. some times the arc of the moral universe bends towards justice. but you know what? some times the arc of the world universe runs around like a

chick edge with its head cut off. continue the two stories. both simultaneously in the news. both from the same country. from our beloved country. the first one from louisiana. last year, there was this weird story that emerged out of east baton rouge. where the local sheriff center deputies to arrest people. a dozen people overall. basically for the crime of flirting with the intention to have sex. now, to be clear this was nottir a prostitution ring or public park or bathroom. what was happening was a cute undercover cop saying, do you want to go home with me? the guy responding, yes. i would like to go home with you. and then boom, handcuffs. it's not part of the date. off off to jail. and the crime, the reason the sheriff's office gave for arresting people in the circumstance was that louisiana

has a state sodomy law. it is illegal to be gay. or at least to act gay in that particular way. the sheriff in east baton rouge said under louisiana state law anything other than heterosexual genital contact only intercourse was illegal. so a guy agreeing to fool around with another guy with a cute deputy would constitute a violation of the sodomy law. agreeing to have sex was being charged as a crime in east baton rouge. of course the problem there is that sodomy laws themselves are illegal. real famous supreme court case, devieded a decade ago. states cannot have sodomy laws. you can't make it illegal to be gay. that word apparently took a long time to reach east baton rouge. ultimately after some national attention to what was going on there last year with all the arrests, the charges did get dropped, against the people the sheriff arrested. he did agree reluctantly he

would expose their records. but of the amazing thing about the story, the state sodomy law in louisiana is on the books. they can enforce it. it is unconstitutional. this week there was a bell to tree pe -- a bill to repeal the law. la the louisiana legislature voted not to, to keep their sodomy law. they did so in emphatic fashion. 27 votes to repeal it. 67 votes to keep it on the books. that's the actual news in this 21st century, america, happy 21st century. kid also, this other story. in the same country on the same day. there was also this story in our national news. the man in this picture is charles j cooper, chuck cooper, one of the most famous accomplished ultraconservative lawyers in the country. he in fact ils the lawyer who dd oral arguments in front of the supreme court defending california's anti-gay proposition 8. mr. cooper was the lawyer tasked

with arguing against marriage against the supreme court. he is a lawyer, did the best he could, california's anti-gay prop 8 got struck down. now after the loss, some of the last remaining marriage bans in the country continue to wind their way through the other courts. one of the things chuck cooper is doing now. he is planning his own daughter's wedding. his own daughter's wedding to a girl. it has been reported to day that in an upcoming book, chuck cooper says his own views are evolving on gay marriage. he learned for the first time his own daughter was gay during the legal battle over prop 8. he loves his daughter. he supports her decision to get married. he is helping her plan her marriage. this time last year he was, planning the oral are gaumegume against gay marriage rights. i love this country. on the same day in the staple news. we have the lawyer who argued against gay marriage in a

landmark gay marriage case himself deciding i might be okay with it. salud, mazel tov, so proud of you. on the same day the state legislature in louisiana voting anew to retain the state's long since overruled totally unenforcible law to make it illegal to be gay. one big, lovely, confused country. one of the things we look to do in our big, lovely confused country on friday nights. we like to all go to prison together. three, two, one, prison! a horrific slashing.