defend themselves. >> ukrainians will fight. >> it's time to consent our anti-tank weaponry and anti-aircraft weaponry. >> deputy dog is right, we must arm these anti-russian forces with rocket launchers. it worked so well in afghanistan and that never bit us in the ass. >> house republicans are doubling down on two major investigations today, congressman jim mcgovern, how would you characterize this? >> mr. speaker, welcome to witch hunt week here in the united states house of representatives. >> couldn't have said it better myself. 5:30 eastern time the house will vote on whether to create a select committee to investigate the 2012 attack that killed four americans in benghazi. republicans control the house so this will probably pass and if it does, the committee is going to be made up of seven republicans and five democrats.

but, wait, this won't be a kangaroo court, at least that's what house speaker john boehner says. >> this was all about getting to the truth. it is not going to be a side show. not going to be a circus. this is a serious investigation. >> and who might the target of that serious investigation be? >> benghazi, the new investigation, are you satisfied with the answers and are you content with what you know what happened? >> absolutely. i mean, of course there are a lot of reasons why despite all of the hearings, all of the information that's been provided some choose not to be satisfied and choose to continue to move forward, that's their choice. and i do not believe there is any reason for it to continue in this way, but they get to call the shots in the congress. >> benghazi has been the subject

of 12 hearings, about 50 briefings and 25,000 pages of documents. as this latest political who done it plays out, the real work of protecting americans goes ignored. but the other big gop investigation this week may have a lot more substance. house republicans vote the wednesday to hold former irs official lo is learner in contempt of congress for refusing to testify about the targeting of conservative groups applying for tax exempt status. he said he hasn't seen a vote like this since the 50s. >> this is unprecedented and even in that era, it failed. i'm wondering where we're going here. my argument was not that i don't want to hear what miss lernor had to say, i do want to hear it. there's something more significant than that. and that is upholding the constitutional rights of every

single american. >> joining me now is democratic congresswoman jackie spierer, dealing with the lerner investigation and the house armed services committee. thank you for joining us. this question of whether lois lerner is about whether she said too many when she pro claimed her innocent and then waived her fifth amendment rights by doing so. did she? >> no, she did not. in fact, 30 legal experts from around the country and different persuasions and law schools opined she did not somehow ab ro gate her rights under the fifth amendment by professing her innocence. there are cases on point that have come before the courts before that have obviously come up with the same conclusion. >> if that's the case, would is it that house lawyers did approve that contempt charge? >> that's what really kind of

interesting. that didn't happen until after the actual actions by the chair. and what's supposed to happen is the chair is supposed to then force her to answer questions and when she refuses to, then she can be held in contempt. he never did that. so it is procedural in nature. but what is miss beingiing in a this. she was willing to testify if she was given one more week because her attorney had to be out of washington, d.c. and chairman issa refused to give her one more week. so there was this unwillingness to just give her some extra time and she would have testified. so this is all about the circus and the side show. and the fact that the speaker says this is not going to be that, i think is sending sub limb lally the message will be. >> let's talk about the

underlying issue. the house voted to urge the department of justice to appoint a special counsel to investigate the irs scandal and targeting of conservative groups in 2010. what kind of safeguards would you propose to prevent that targeting from happening again? >> let's first address the issue of targeting. progressive groups were targeted and conservative groups were targeted. but how were they targeted? they were targeted to determine whether or not they were spending 51% of their time on political activities and if they were, then they would not have been eligible for a 501 c4 designati designation. ironically any of these groups could have self-certified under the law and allowed to move forward with anywhere activities -- >> but congresswoman, in fact when lois lerner was asked whether liberal groups were targeted in the same way, she declined to answer and said there's no evidence of that. >> the inspector general actually found that there were

progressive groups along with conservative groups that were targeted but they were targeted for purposes of trying to evaluate whether or not they were more political than they were social well fare. >> it doesn't seem at the very least the preponderance of groups being targeted were tea party affiliated groups. now the rationale behind that may have been innocent. and you make a good point earlier, the explosion of those 501 c4 groups is a problem, but don't you think it is an issue when the targeting of groups skews in one direction or another politically? >> i think the real issue here is, are these 501 c-4 legitimate social welfare entities and the truth is i don't think they are. the law provides they should be exclusively for social welfare

purpose and the irs in the regulations changed to world to primarily which is different from exclusively. i would like to see 501 c-4s would be educational social welfare in nature and political arms dressed up differently. >> do you think anything needs to change in terms of protections in place to prevent political targeting? >> the political targeting? what is the political targeting? it means the difference of having to disclose who gives you money. that's the only difference now. if you're engaging in some kind of political communication and communication that is in fact trying to persuade voters one way or the other, don't we want to know who's providing the money for that particular position? >> i think the using is using key words affiliated with one party or another. as we move on to benghazi, democrats have proposed sitting out the committee entirely. do you think that's a smart move

politically? >> we need to understand one thing. this is select committee will not have any more power than the oversight and government reform committee under daryl issa, it is being done to rev up the base and fund raise from the base and try and wound secretary of state hillary clinton if she decides to run for the presidency. if they want to move forward with what i believe will be a circus, i think they've got to do a couple of things. one is they've got to make sure that all information is shared between both sides and that depositions that are held are held together, that they are joint depositions. if you really want to play fair, you've got to be fair. >> i certainly hope that comes to pass. seems like there are a lot of obstacles. thank you. >> i want to bring in bob shrum. and robert trayhnum. pleasure to have you back. bob shrum, the push for

democrats to sit you don't know the benghazi commit or if you're not at the table, are you on the menu? >> that's very good. i think in the end they will go to the committee and sit there and we'll see some real fireworks as this moves on. there's a big reality here, i think, and that is that the republican party especially in congress doesn't have anything left but the politics of investigation. they can't get their act together to pass immigration reform, can't get their act together on the minimum wage. obamacare strategy is falling apart. they had a hearing with a republican dominated committee with insurance executives who said people are not -- they are not only signing up, they are paying their premiums and insurance executives refuse to agree there would be a spike next year in premiums. so we're going to have a whole year of investigations. didn't work out too well for the republicans in 1998. we'll see how it works out this time. >> they are certainly mobilizing for the long haul. let's talk about the substance of the committee.

robert trayhnum, the chairman of the economy will be the only one able to issue subpoenas through the committee. take a listen to how he characterized his role on "morning joe". >> would you suggest fellow members while this investigation going on they not use benghazi for fund raising purposes? >> yes, i will cite myself as an exam. . i have never sought to raise single penny on the backs of four murdered americans. >> never a single penny but take a look at this nrrc fund raising 7:40 a.m. just yesterday asking for donations to help gowdy, we don't have the graphic but that e-mail is incriminating stuff in light of that quote and people have been comparing how starkly the roads and actual fundraising e-mails differ. does that damage the credibility of this initiative? >> it puts into question the credibility of what speaker boehner said and congressman gowdy said in question of

getting to the facts and bottom of this. as congressman gowdy said, this is about four murdered americans. we owe it to their families and american people and we owe it to the embassy staff and to a civilized society to get to the bottom of this. you can't sweep this under the rug and say, that's unfortunate that happened. that's not how it works in this country. we get to the bottom of things and hold people accountable. number one so it doesn't happen again but secondly to hold people accountable if and whoever did this so we can go after them. this is not about politics, this is really about policy and making sure more americans are not murdered in the future. >> i couldn't agree more with you about the underlying goals. we saw hillary clinton talking about how it is about politics and wouldn't continue with the investigations. robin roberts seemed to directly imply she was only allowed to ask one question and it wasn't an interview but event. you call the shots and back to

philanthropy. why did hillary clinton allow that one strategically? >> i don't think she's afraid of this issue in the sense that it's an issue that appeals to the base. it has already been thoroughly investigated and the inspector general investigated it. and there have been all of these hearings held about it. there's a conclusion that there's no evidence whatsoever of political involvement in it. she's a target of all of this. because of 2016. but the deeper reality is, you have republicans right now who have to appeal to the base. look, somebody said today, that hillary clinton didn't testify under only when she testified. it's the implication that she lied? this is going into cloud koo koo land. when the speaker of the house says i promise you won't be a circus, that's a guarantee that it will be. >> we'll see how this plays out. thank you, our favorite roberts, bob shrum will stick around. up next, monica lewinsky in her

own words don't miss it. she keeps you on your toes. you wouldn't have it any other way. but your erectile dysfunction - it could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any allergic reactions like rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about experiencing cialis for daily use and a free 30-tablet trial.

you always get the lowest price book any flight or hotel and if you find it for less we'll match it and give you fifty dollars back that's the expedia guarantee if you have a business idea, we have a personalized legal solution that's right for you. with easy step-by-step guidance, we're here to help you turn your dream into a reality. start your business today with legalzoom.

we're here to help you turn your dream into a reality. mattress discounters memorial day sale! what's this? a queen-size sealy gel memory foam mattress for just $497? mattress discounters has the largest selection of memory foam mattresses under one roof! comforpedic... icomfort... optimum... and wow! four years interest-free financing on the entire tempur-pedic cloud collection! don't miss the memorial day sale. ♪ mattress discounters

we're back, vanity fair released the full text of the monica lewinsky bombshell piece. she begins explaining the moment she was asked in public, quote, how does it feel to be america's premiere, well, you know, queen? well, lieu inxi says it's insulting as insulting as it to me it's more insulting to my family. i don't know why this whole story became about oral sex. i don't. it was a mutual relationship. she admits to suicidal thoughts but uses the piece as an opportunity to tern from the sense of regret to how she's

moving forward. >> i didn't let this define me. i hadn't had the life experience to establish my own identity in 1998. if you haven't figured out who you are, it's hard to accept the horrible image created by others. joined by bob shrum and beth clue we. one of the things that interest me here is her trying to take ownership of this scandal and place it occupies in her life. has she earned that? >> she tried to way back at the time. she co-wrote a memoir and appeared on reality television and did a line of handbags. she definitely owned her identity back then and parlaid the naughtiness in who she tried to make her identity and it didn't go anywhere. >> she's chronicling it not going anywhere. it's a sad piece. >> it's a very sad piece. she really is stuck. she says she doesn't want to be that person anymore but she never has been anything else. she is an always will be the monica lewinsky of 1998 who led

to bill clinton's impeachment. >> everyone will talk about the impact on a hillary clinton run. does this hurt or help put it behind her? >> i think lynn cheney is way offbase when she suggests somehow or other that hillary clinton put vanity fair up to doing this to get it out of the way. i don't think it will have any impact whatsoever on hillary clinton if she runs and i think she will run. i think people have already factored this in and understand it. it's 17 years ago that we're now talking about when this stuff occurred going on into impeachment, the only reason this is getting as much attention because beth is completely right. monica lewinsky, for whom this i suspect was traumatic and every right to have her say, tried several times in the past to define this. but it's been a long time. it's been ten, 15 years. now it's getting a lot more attention. >> i tend to degree about the link to hillary clinton being overplayed. clearly this is an important

part of that family's personal history, but beyond that, it's unclear how it actually links up to anything meaningful in her political reputation. this is a woman for whom the tea leaves of standing by her man, et cetera, et cetera, have been read and read again. she lived through this on a private level. we'll see if that's how it's taken. what do you think that allegation that she maybe put monica up to this? >> it's toitally ridiculous. she came forward because of the possibility of a hillary clinton run but the people making this an issue in the past are republicans, rand paul called bill clinton a sexual predator, if democrats are talking about the war on women, that you know, that bill clinton was waging this war -- >> this may help with that charge. she does clearly say it was a consensual relationship and worse trauma was the backlash on the hill, not the incident itself. >> republicans went crazy about this at the time, impeach the

guy. there was no support around the country. president clinton was popular and economy was strong. the impeachment really rach eted badly on republicans and they lost seats in 1998. for them to bring this up for rand paul to even have brought it up is kind of crazy, bill clinton is the most popular political figure in the country. there's no traction for this. >> do you think this is the last gasp of this scandal? >> no, i think somehow or other hand paul is not going to let go of this. a lot of republicans will not let go. you look at the last segment of this show. the republican party is now committed to the politics of investigation, politics of scandal, they think that's their way forward. >> and as monica chronicles it a pretty heart wrenching way, everybody loves a sex scandal and everybody loves tau tri. >> you're going to host the economic leaders of the world. step one, maybe find the children of your country. we talk nigeria next. when folks think about what they get from alaska,

they think salmon and energy. but the energy bp produces up here creates something else as well: jobs all over america. engineering and innovation jobs. advanced safety systems & technology. shipping and manufacturing. across the united states, bp supports more than a quarter million jobs. when we set up operation in one part of the country, people in other parts go to work. that's not a coincidence. it's one more part of our commitment to america. who would have thought masterthree cheese lasagna would go with chocolate cake and ceviche? the same guy who thought that small caps and bond funds would go with a merging markets. it's a masterpiece. thanks. clearly you are type e. you made it phil. welcome home. now what's our strategy with the fondue? diversifying your portfolio? e*trade gives you the tools and resources to get it right.

are you type e*? the was a truly amazing day. without angie's list, i don't know if we could have found all the services we needed for our riley. for over 18 years we've helped people take care of the things that matter most. join today at angieslist.com

if you ask me about did you ever have chickenpox? 1 in 3 people will get shingles in their lifetime. guess which one i was.

i believe these girls will be the beginning of end of terror in nigeria. >> this was goodluck jonathan speaking out about the terror group responsible for kidnapping hundreds of school girls almost four weeks ago. we saw a new deadly round of violence by boko haram on a busy marketplace in northern nigeria and almost 300 people were killed. the girls remain missing, the kind of abuse women and girls face is fueling international outrage with hillary clinton just yesterday. >> the seizure of these young women by this radical extremist

group, boko haram is abominable and criminal and accounts the fullest response possible. >> first lady michelle obama tweeting what's become an international rallying cry, hash tag, bring back our girls. as the world converges on nigeria's for the world economic forum. we get the latest. >> reporter: thank you, the main development here in my year i can't is that some of the mothers and relatives of the abducted girls have been taken by state officials back to the school where their daughters and sisters were taken away by militants from the boko haram group three weeks ago. they were obviously distraught at visiting the scene of that attack. many of them breaking down. here in the capital, the nigeria

president has been speaking for first time about the crisis for which he's been so criticized in this country and beyond. he said his government is doing all it could to try to find the girls. there's a growing feeling amongst the international community and diplomats here that time is slipping away and that many of these girls may have been disbursed across the borders into neighboring countries into other african countries. while the president said he was grateful to the united states and other countries for offering help, what they really needy think now is technical and surveillance equipment, monitoring those borders to see if the girls are being smuggled across and being sold into slavery as the boko haram militants have said. there's a growing sense of urgency to find the girls as it slips into week four. >> thank you so much. we'll stay with this story as the outrage continues to go

global, including on the internet where it shows no sign of stopping. a note of that. we ran an interview with one of the early champions, contrary to widespread reports, she was not the originator. the vice president of the world bank of africa urge the nigeria government did it in a speak and then the first one to hash tag it. an unexpected new platform for atheism. ready for the real nonbelieves of atlanta? stay with us.

radar online just obtained what it claims is new audio of

donald sterling, first time we've heard since his punishment by the nba. nbc news has not authenticated this but he appears to speak on the phone with an unidentified man and defend himself against allegations of racism. >> i mean, how could you think i'm a racist knowing me all of these years? how can you be in this business and be a racist? do you think i tell the coach to get white players? or to get the best player he can get? >> how could you think it? sterling goes on to say he won't sell the clippers. efforts are already under way to force him out. and remember, every week this humble dj takes your request for the underreported story of the week. of the last one, the mounting popularity of atheism, the group american atheists will host a roku streaming network.

this will be the first for atheist and hope to reach an audience up to 7 million households. joining me is david silverman, thank you for joining us sir. >> thank you for having me. >> why a channel? do you find atheist comment doesn't have a home elsewhere? >> the only home is the internet. on television, there isn't anything. so many people have come to me and said, there's so much religious programming on television and so much one-sided reporting on television, why can't we get something on the televisions of the world that present our views and present the diversity that is atheism. we went to roku and to place everybody on television who subscribes a broad range of programming deliberately geared to atheist and atheist supporters. >> there may be a commercial

incentivism. atheism appears to be on the rise. in 2005, 1% of the world's population identified itself as atheist. by 2005 you see there, the number had moved to 5%. what do you think is beyond that rapid growth? >> that's a much smaller number than real. atheist is a broad term. people who call themselves ago nos ticks are atheist and secular nuns -- >> not all agnostics would self-identify -- >> according to you. >> if you don't have an active belief in god, you're an atheist. if you're a jew or christian and don't believe in -- >> what about those that believe in the whole range? >> if you don't have an active belief in a god, whatever term you call yourself, that's fine but still an atheist. that brings the number from 5% up closer to 15 to 20%.

and that -- >> part of the message of this channel will be getting that word out, you consider it as a broader category than just the hard liners insistent there is no god. >> exactly. you know what when it comes to polls we are the fastest growing in all 50 states between the scandals and scams and child kidnappers, people are beginning to realize, religion is not the go to for morality and ethics. they are looking at atheism and realize we're not having any sort of money raising and most importantly we're note making it up as we go along. >> we talked earlier about how passionate some of these atheist rallies and events can be. it's intriguing to me while atheism is a rejection of belief it can inspire as much ferver.

>> we are not a religion and -- >> it's a scam, all gods are false and we need to realize that on a worldwide basis. and we need to promote that, knowledge and scientific reasoning and learning and tolerance and diversity. >> you get very fiery talking about this. >> sure. >> what's the harm in believing in god? go you think it's all about terrorist causes? there are also secular terrorist causes. >> and they are bad, all terrorist causes must be destroyed whether they are atheist or secular or core religion. those religious causes must be stopped. >> what about the peaceful for whom this provides support? >> isn't that wonderful. >> you say that somehow snidely, i know a lot of people it's been a bedrock and inspires peace. >> religion takes credit where it's not due. you're a good person because ou're a christian is not true

and good person and you're a christian is the true statement. what about the good christians and jews doing good, they do good without the church. >> you don't buy religious plurlism, for that person who is a christian and good person, should abandon beliefs. >> they all should look at facts and reality and not take the fact they were born into a religion as the need to stay in their religion. they should look at the world, read the bible, cover to cover, then read daukins cover to cover and find out where you belong. we're not talking about ee advantage liesing but learning and taking a step back and figuring out where in the world the truth lies. >> what would a world of all atheists look like? >> scandanavia. >> a very, very small religious population and all walk around smiling all the time. >> could it be the vast oil well

and radically different economic systems that encourage more wealth sharing? >> if you look at that, then you have to look at the oil countries where there is religion and see how much wealth sharing there is there and not very much. religion doesn't cause that, religion actually supports hoarding. >> it is certainly a compelling set of views to many people. there are a lot of people intrigued by this. we've been watching stories in the last week by the rise of this on college campuses for instance. we'll see how the trends unfold. thank you for that impassioned told and we'll look forward to the real housewifs of atheism. >> we're a nation of bredreamer and this one met with the obama administration. we'll talk to her straight ahead. ♪ oh-oh, oh, oh, la, la-la, la-la, la-la ♪ ♪ na-na-na, na-na-na-na-na some things just go together, like auto and home insurance.

bundle them together at progressive, and you save big on both. ♪ oh, oh-oh, oh, oh hey, it's me! [ whistles ] and there's my dog! [gasps] there's my steps! i should stop talking. perfectly paired savings. now, that's progressive. crest 3d white whitestrips vs. a whitening pen. i feel like i'm going to miss a spot. i think you actually might have. i feel like my lips are going to, like, wash it off. these fit nicely. wait, it says to use up to four times a day? oh, gosh. i'm not going to do that. [ female announcer ] crest 3d white whitestrips adhere to your teeth evenly and safely remove stains below the enamel surface for professional level results that last up to 12 months. this says it removes 14 years of stains. it doesn't tell me how many stains it removes. [ female announcer ] crest 3d white whitestrips. the way to whiten.

[ female announcer ] crest 3d white whitestrips. ♪

make every day, her day with a full menu of appetizers and entrées crafted with care and designed to delight. fancy feast. love served daily. the state of oklahoma has

granted a temporary reprieve for the next inmate set to die. charles warner is given a six-month stay after the execution of clayton lockett who died 43 minutes after he was given a botched cocktail. and for our call to action today, embattled by charges that he is a deporter in chief, the president is reviewing u.s. deportation policies and making them, quote, more humane. that push took a tentative step forward when homeland security secretary johnson met with leaders of immigration groups. some were controversial like anti-immigration law groups under threat by nonwhite immigrants. and other groups are more inspiring, dhs secretary also met with members of united we dream. a nationwide coalition of young immigration activists calling for immigration policies that

don't split up families. 2012 the obamaadministration stopped those under 16 years old and lived here for at least five years. that's critical, not just for dreamers but america's ability to not lose its best and brightest young people. what about their parents? what about their families? >> joining us now is lorella, director of policy at united we dream. i wanted to ask you about the news today on this. earlier today the obama administration announced public schools shouldn't ask the immigration status of the students. do you think that's the right move? >> absolutely, i don't think schools need to be intimidating parents or the students themselves. their immigration status is irrelevant when they are in school. >> take us inside your advocacy on this you met with secretary johnson and your group shared stories of those impacted, how did he react to you? >> the secretary was positive.

the secretary was very curious to know the stories of the dreamers there. and i was very excited because there were seven leaders before the secretary saying it has been great, deferred action for childhood arrivals that gives them a work permit and temporary protection for deportation, giving dreamers a greater level of security and ability to contribute to the country in greater ways because it resources us but it's not enough. our parents every day live under the threat of deportation. we were very clear with the secretary that intentions are great but at the same time we will be judging this administration and its legacy based on their actions. so will the administration extend a program to our parents and give them temporary protection from deportations is critical. >> you want action. you mentioned that one action item. you proposed five things the obama administration should do. walk us through those.

>> one of things the obama administration can and ought to do immediately is an affirmative administrative program, so a program similar to the ones for dreamers for parents to come forward to talk about their status and to get a work permit and have that level of security. another thing is expanding the program that currently exists for dreamers. there's an arbitrary age cut-off date right now. maybe they are 32 instead of 30 and no longer meet the criteria for this program and it's truly arbitrary. another thing is stop the deportation and stop deporting people who don't poes a serious violent threat to public safety. but not people who can be legalized by any type of immigration reform bill. another thing we think is serious and important, for the administration to reunify the families it deported. there's actually statutory authority that the president has

to bring back people that they've wrongfully separated from their families. >> when you talk about expanding these categories of people who shouldn't be deported, what do you say to critics who say they are muching off the american economy, taking resources that should go to mesh citizens. how do you react? >> i ask them to think about my mom who has been here for 15 years, a taxpayer, who has raised me to be this young leader and so if we are only thinking about dreamers because some of them go to school and graduate and go on to college, but we're not thinking about the role our parents have played and the fsacrifices they've done, m mom adds to the rich diversity of the country. >> does it bother you secretary johnson also met with anti-immigration groups? >> i think the secretary has sted he is hearing from all sides and that i think that is fine as long as the administration understands that

our demand is very clear. the president has the legal wide legal authority to do more than what he's doing and has hit 2 million deportations. this is the legacy of this administration and it is the story that our families experience every day. >> we'll see if that legacy changes. thank you so much for your time. we also need your help on this effort. sign our letter to speaker john boehner calling on him to pass comprehensive immigration reform this year. it's on our website. logon and you can enter your name and e-mail address with ease. so far more than 800 of you have joined that call. jan tweets, thank you for that segment on immigration reform and thank you, jan and i did as you said, ronan, peace. thanks for signing the letter. let us know why you think immigration reform is important, by twitter, facebook or e-mail, get us the word and get the word to speaker boehner. hello pyongyang, for the

countries rock star actors and pop idols should a world's tour include a tour of dictators. don't go away. it's great for watching game film and drawing up plays. it's got onenote, so i can stay on top of my to-do list, which has been absolutely absurd since the big game. with skype, it's just really easy to stay in touch with the kids i work with. alright, russell you are good to go! alright, fellas. alright, russ. back to work!

there was a boy who traveled to a faraway place where villages floated on water and castles were houses dragons lurked giants stood tall and the good queen showed the boy it could all be real avo: whatever you can imagine, all in one place expedia, find yours

we are back, a singing, a dn rights watchdog. what happens? same thing that happens with everything else. last month erica sang happy birthday for a king of swaziland. now she's getting blasted for whitewashing the corrupt dictator known as the last absolute monarch in the world. the king and his 13 wives own an estimated $100 million fortune while the rest of his country survives on less than $1 a day. she denied she was paid and then spent hours defending herself on twitter. this is a lot bigger issue. all of these celebrities have

performed for moammar gadhafi. joining me from washington is a man on the other side of the tweet war with bedu, jeffrey smith at the rfk center. thanks so much for joining us, sir. we want to mention we reached out to bedu, but she didn't reply. she said you were ridiculous and manipulative. why such an extreme reaction? >> that's a very good question, ronan. thanks for having me. the comments you mentioned by her didn't -- won't even scratch the surface of some of the names she called me. and a co-author of mine whom we wrote a piece on this entire issue, at one point questioning our sexuality, calling us racists, and if erica badu had any semblance of the context in swaziland, she wouldn't have reacted the way she did. first and foremost, this is the last absolute monarchy in africa. there are serious human rights abuses that take place there,

including arbitrary detention, torture, all political activity is banned. so here we have the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. erica has a right to sing for whomever she wants. >> on the huge world stage. >> exactly. swazis do not have that right. there is no freedom of expression in swaziland or freedom of assembly. >> do you think when we went through the long list of celebrities, presumably giving them the benefit of the doubt, 50 cent, hillary swampg, all of these people don't support torture and all these things. do you think this comes largely from ignorance? >> i wouldn't go that far. i think as i was saying before, i think people like padu have the right to earn a paycheck. they have to realize that their stature, their celebrity brings along with it some responsibility. >> but it's not ma lashs in your view, in other words? you think they just don't know the context? >> that would leave that up to

the individual artists. >> what about badu, for instance? >> when she goes to swaziland or scheduled to go to gambia this week, since she has since backed out of, when artists go to these very closed dictatorial regimes, it offers legitimacy and gives credibility to these otherwise tarnished human rights abusers. >> she's disputing reports she was going to perform in the coming month for the dictator of gambia. do you think she backed out as a result of his back plash? >> again, i can't comment on that. all i can say up in will yesterday, the government of gambia, the minister of tourism was expecting her to be there. her face and name were on the program. and her face and her personality feature prominently on the homecoming festival.

>> why do you think they continue to do it? is it just the money, or an easy way they think they'll not get blowback? it seems if they're relatively informed about the news media, they should know they're going to get blowback now. >> i honestly think these stars think they can get away with it. swaziland is off the grid. maybe no one listening is aware of it. it's near the mozambique border. perhaps she thought she could get in and get back out. the ironic thing is, her entire platform is being socially conscious afro centric activist, when unfortunately when she was singing happy birthday to a king living in opulence while his population are starving and the others suffering from the words hiv/aids epidemic in the world, down the street there are those

sitting in cells questioning the validity of the swaziland. if you follow the twitter conversation i had with her, i mentioned a number of times -- >> what cost would be to her to use the opportunity to draw attention to some attention to these human rights wrongs? >> it would cost her nothing. again and again myself and my co-author tried to use the twitter platform to get her to speak in favor of human rights, speak in favor of these activists who sit in prison merely for demanding their basic rights. >> look, there are people who say that it's too harsh to beat up on celebrities for this. but i think it's fair in that way. hilary swampg gave back the money she received from the president of chechnya. i think they respond and use their platform in the right way. thank you so much. >> thank you. check this story out.

that wraps it up for "ronan farrow daily." catch my show 1:00 p.m. eastern time right here on msnbc. now it's time for "the reid report" with my colleague joy reid who will always rule over my heart. what do you have coming up? ? how sweet. well, i am in chicago today, ronan. beating the irs and benghazi drums again, despite the fact that there still ain't no bear there. and nfl draft day. all eyes are on michael sam. history-making day in professional sports. reid report live from chi town begins in minutes. while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can ease arthritis symptoms. but if you have arthritis, this can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain,

and improve daily physical function so moving is easier. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain. and it's not a narcotic. you and your doctor should balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naproxen and meloxicam have the same cardiovascular warning. they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death. this chance increases if you have heart disease or risk factors such as high blood pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods. nsaids, like celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions, or stomach and intestine problems, such as bleeding and ulcers, which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. don't take celebrex if you have bleeding in the stomach or intestine, or had an asthma attack, hives, other allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history and ask your doctor about celebrex.

for a body in motion.

tigers, both of you. tigers? don't be modest. i see how you've been investing. setting long term goals. diversifying. dip! you got our attention. we did? of course. you're type e* well, i have been researching retirement strategies. well that's what type e*s do. welcome home. taking control of your retirement? e*trade gives you the tools and resources to get it right. are you type e*? happy thursday, readers. this is "the reid report," coming to you live from chicago. the pressure moupts for the nigerian government to do something to save 236 captive

girls. >> deadly violence in nigeria. >> the government of nigeria has been, in my view, somewhat derelict in its responsibility toward protecting boys and girls. >> this is not the time for national chauvinism, or face-saving. we need to save our girls. we need to save our girls. >> congresswoman karen beck just met with the nigerian embassy. we'll talk to her about the meeting and what the u.s. can do to help. plus -- >> this is a good quality health care system. not perfect. >> the secretary of veterans affairs vows he's not stepping down, after republicans and the american legion called for his ouster. following reports after up to 40 veterans died waiting for care at a va hospital. i'll talk to patrick murphy, former congressman and a rothmore vet about b