tv NOW With Alex Wagner MSNBC July 2, 2014 1:00pm-2:01pm PDT
1:00 pm
corporations desired ends. now that we know corporations have religious rights, let's hope they find a soul. that does it for "the cycle." "now" with alex wagner starts right now. >> in time for independence day, a raging battle over whose country this really is. >> an angry standoff in southern california. >> border boiling point. >> as this nation of immigrants gets ready to celebrate the fourth of july. >> anti-immigration protesters try to physically block arriving immigrant families. >> demonstrators turned back three bus loads of undocumented children. >> usa! usa! >> protesters met buss chanting -- >> go home. >> this is a humanitarian crisis.
1:01 pm
>> we've seen the rhetoric becoming increasingly ugly and nasty. >> i think these kids are a pawn in the bigger immigration debate. >> the longer the republicans look like they are the anti-hispanic party, the harder it's going to be to deal with it. >> less than 24 hours ago in california, the raging and bitter fight over immigration reached a new low. three buses of migrant women and children had to be flown to california to alleviate overcrowding at texas border stations. before they reached their destination, they are barred from entering the designated facility by flag waving anti-immigration protesters. protesters whose message was clear, we don't want you here. >> go home! go home! >> usa! usa! >> those chants were accompanied
1:02 pm
by others, including we want to be safe and deport, deport. the anti-immigrant pro testers were blocking buses at the urging of the town's mayor, alan long who posted what he termed an illegal update on his facebook wall. acongress cording to the update the federal government to enforce the laws including deportation of illegal immigrants crossing the borders not disburse them into local communities. murrieta will remain safe, among those blocking buses filled with women and children seeking a better life in the united states. >> right now thousands of people are being alouled in illegally and we're coming out here to voice our objection against that. they didn't come here legally. there's a legal process. i think there's a lot of people finally upset with what's going on. we've taken things and finally ready to stand up and defend our community. >> the turmoil and vit tree ol
1:03 pm
was not nearly enough to convince the far right something needs to be done to reform the system. it may have done the opposite. this is how fox news covered the standoff. >> we were just telling you about this, we are fed up. >> according to the wall street journal, the televised site of chaos on the border has been a god send to gop nativists. as for the next destination, the l.a. times reports citing safety and security considerations they are declining to ask what's next for the 140 detainees. today the national border patrol council says 140 women and children have been located other places, where we can only hope
1:04 pm
they saw a different side of the united states. joining me now it anchor of telemundo and president and ceo of the council, janet. when you see the footage of these furious crowds yelling go home, go home. i think it brings -- i will say personally found it to be a shameful moment to see people treated like that. people seeking a new day in america. what is also confounding to me, these people are able to dictate deportation policy as anti-immigrant protesters turned the buses around. what was your reaction? >> i agree with you, it is appalling and outrageous to see that this group of extremists and really really lending themselves a vigilantes were able to control an outcome, determine an outcome.
1:05 pm
we have to honor a process. these buses were filled with women and mostly children, children who are escaping violence and gangs in their home countries. and as americans, whether we're white, black or brown, we have to really lean into our values here and understand that we would never slam the door shut on a child who was afraid and crying at our doorstep. that's not how we react as americans. and what i'd like to believe and what gives me hope. what we saw in that situation is really a group of extremists who do not represent the vast mat jort of americans who understand that these are children in need of care and safety and that there's a process both domestic laws and international laws that need to be honored. we can do that as americans, i think we can embrace that.
1:06 pm
>> jose, the wall street journal called the crisis on the border a god send to gop nativists. i do not know whether this crisis has been a god sent to the gop. breaking news this hour, 33 republican members of congress have sent a letter to president obama asking him for -- to publicly commit that newly arrived illegal immigrants will not receive legal status or deferred action. i don't know. i don't know if this places the republican party in -- i think it places them in a worse position than perhaps even a few weeks ago when they were just standing in the way of broader reform. >> yeah, alex, thank you. there are so many things to talk about that you've mentioned just in the top of this hour. number one, i certainly hope that in this era of recycling, that the protesters that had signs that we want to be safe had given that to the children that were in those buses because
1:07 pm
that's why the children are leaving the country. many times risking death, rape, destruction of their personal beings in order to try and be safe. that's number one. number two, people simply are ignoring the law. the law is -- and it's a law passed under george w. bush, bipartisan effort that was signed into law in 2008, says that unaccompanied minors that cross over the border should be handed over by border security, border patrol to hhs to be processed differently. their cases must be seen to be differently. that's the law. if the folks out there want the law to be respected, then i would suspect they applaud this 2008 law, which treats those same children that were in the bus differently. you know what, alex, there's a bigger picture. those 33 legislators asked president obama to rescinds deferred action for millions brought here through no fault of their own and now able to come
1:08 pm
out from under the shadows. >> having said that, i talked to a guatemalan young lady, just turned 17 and came over and now reunited with her father here. they have been nine years separate from each other. she didn't tell the father she was coming over. i asked the young lady, do you know you could have been raped or killed? she said, yes, but i just -- that's better than living in the fear of my little town where the gangs and the narco traffickers are doing that on a daily basis to little boys and girls. no one wants borders to be open for countries to not have a policy. but it's precisely what everybody has been asking for. let's have a policy. and the same people that were protesting buses don't want immigration reform, which would deal with among other issues, the border and unaccompanied minors. >> the poisonous atmosphere is not just retore cal.
1:09 pm
we're looking at an increase in hispanic targeted violence. the bureau of justice statistics reports hate crimes against hispanics more than tripled from 2011 to 2012 and in part, because of increased tensions around the immigration reform debate and immigration in general. that i think is probably one of the most disturbing aspects, the way this debate, which is fundamentally -- i'll be honest, emotional debate and brings people into different camps but that it would have a violent it race for a lot of americans is deep lly distressing. >> it is. we have seen this play out in different cycles before throughout this immigration debate. and when it intensifies, there's a direct correlation between the vit treeal and the appeal that some of those extremists make to the fears and to the unconscious
1:10 pm
prejudice that many people have and when you start using terms that are dehumanizing and portraying these individuals in ways that are not reflective of us as in a humanitarian view, then i think it all breaks down. rhetoric does matter. actions matter and we have to make sure that as americans that we are understanding that there is a humanitarian situation. these are children who are escaping and going through a horrendous journey as jose mentioned to get here. they are risking so much. our response as americans needs to be to make sure we're honoring the process, the domestic and international laws that are applicable here. that's all we're asking for. >> we need to make sure the laws are honored. >> to that point though, the president is on the hook very much so from a lot of immigration activists and
1:11 pm
advocates given his historic numbers of deportations, if this is about following the law, it's inevitable a majority, if not a sizable number of these women and children will get deported. i wonder if you think in the community that will understand, if you will, the necessity of doing that if the president is to follow the law. >> that's certainly one of the issues that we're looking at. i've got to tell you, some are concerned that the president among the $2 billion he's asking congress to deal with this humanitarian crisis on border is asking for the 2008 law to be rescinded or changed so border patrol agents could decide deportation or not. unaccompanied minors. question is there's no doubt there's a crisis on border. what should and could the united states be doing? all of those kids coming are coming pause they have family members here. my only question is, you as a parent, what would you be willing to do to have your son or daughter reunited with you?
1:12 pm
>> janet murguia and jose diaz, we look forward to your show on msnbc. >> after the break, president obama calls john boehner's bluff, discussing the imperial presidency next here on "now." c. at humana, we believe if healthcare changes, if frustration and paperwork decrease... the gap begins to close. so let's simplify things. let's close the gap between people and care.
1:13 pm
1:14 pm
1:15 pm
we may be in the lazy hazy days of summer but may be days that define what is left of the relationship between congress and president obama for the remainder of the president's term. while republicans in congress have always been reluctant to work with this president, the heated buildup to the mid-term
1:16 pm
elections appears to be making them incapable of pursuing any action at all. take, for example, the highway trust fund. if congress doesn't act by the end of the summer, the money will run out halting roads and bridge repairs and jobs that come with them at the height of the construction season in august. john boehner loves to roll out his favorite line, where are the jobs. president obama had a better question, why won't republicans do anything? >> it's not -- you know, the imperial presidency or no laws are broken. we've just building roads and bridges like we've been doing for the last, i don't know, 50, 100 years. i haven't heard a good reason why they haven't acted. it's not like they've been busy with other stuff. >> indeed they are too busy, crafting a lawsuit against president obama. and indeed it is the imperial presidency just ask karl rove. >> this man has done more to reince constitute the concept of
1:17 pm
the imperial presidency than nixon put the secret service uniform division in weird uniforms. to thumb his nose so childishly at constitutional constraints on the executive -- >> karl rove is right about one thing, richard nixon did put his white house secret service in weird marching band like uniforms pictured there. i dare say mr. rove remisplaces what mr. obama may be thumbing his nose at. joining me is michael steele and howard dean. >> governor and lieutenant governor -- >> i love it. so much in common and yet so little in common. >> michael steele, let me start with you, the highway trust fund, is this a good idea for republicans to litigate and be preparing a lawsuit so close to the midterm elections? do you think this helps? >> my own view is i don't think
1:18 pm
it does. i think it becomes a distraction from some broader and more important arguments that congress could make about the president's agenda, certainly given the revision downward of the forecast for the economic growth -- >> the jobs thing. i think there is a lot more meat and substance for the party to go after. but i understand the politics of this. we're into that foggy hazy crazy day of summer in washington. where this type of distraction is what everybody wants because it takes a lot of pressure off of actually getting anything done. >> well, governor dean, getting anything done, it's become an enaj ma to washington. i wonder whether you think all of the vitreal has to do with overreach or republican frustration that president obama seems to have found in some way a work around around their intrans jens.
1:19 pm
>> i think they are incompetent and untrust worthy. we're paying them, they are doing nothing. they did do something, yesterday the ethics committee decided to make it easier to hide the taxpayers money you spend when you take a congressional trip. they need to go and i think they get their butts kicked in november. people are sick of this. they may like or may not like barack obama. there hasn't been a debate about policy a serious debate about policy last six months. and i think that the american people are just disgusted. i'm certainly disgusted with them. i question their patriotism really. we're paying them to do something and they are doing nothing. >> there is the old addage that congress can run against a president. the president is -- obviously not running for re-election, he can't, but democrats can run against the congress in a weird way given how much the face of
1:20 pm
this do nothing congress -- >> on the other side of the coin, the face of a harry reid. you have the concern of those members of the democratic party and senate who are from north carolina, and louisiana. so there are dynamics of what the president is saying and how he's pushing that for some democrats could be problematic in terms of the fact they are in a red state and have to defend -- >> in so far as he's pursuing executive action on progressive priorities. >> and that resonates, when they are trying to hold on, this very interesting try angulation that fwoez on in that regard and both parties are trying to find the sweet spot where they have the ultimate advantage. the president thinks he has it rea torically and republicans think they have it in the numbers. based on what howard just said, people of ticked off. to the extent you continue to feed the furnace, that flame
1:21 pm
grows hotter and the question becomes does it burn the republican or democrats or that's where the voters have to make up their mind. >> governor dean, i've been trans fixed by the dual attack on the president, one and particularly sort of fervent right now is an imperial president. but he's been called a lame duck president. ed rogers writes, president obama's recent speeches and remarks make it obvious he's not making any serious effort to govern or drive woshld events except for covering the basics, he seems to have taken something like an early retirement. your thoughts on that assessment? >> that's just silly washington talk. i don't read the "washington post" for that reason. it's hard to take it seriously. >> governor dean, uncensored. continue, please. >> it really is. look, i know -- michael is right, everybody is trying to take advantage of each other and democrats and republicans. what about the american people? we're paying these people a salary. they are doing nothing.
1:22 pm
they get their butts fired if they were the private sector. they are doing nothing. i cannot believe that you can't come to a bipartisan agreement about building roads and bridges, we've been doing it for 50 or 100 years. i never heard of stalling a highway bill for whatever re-election advantage. i cannot bref believe what i'm saying, how do i talk young people into doing anything in politics when these politicians are setting a disgusting example zpl good point. >> do you think the president calling out republicans as he is, probably correctly, but in terms of political effectiveness and legislative effectiveness, is that the best route for him to take, you guys are doing nothing? >> the republicans have made it clear they are not going to do anything and the best way to do that is fire every one of them. >> and i think that when i listen to the president the other day, both in the rose garden and speech he gave afterwards, i got this
1:23 pm
overwhelming sense, this is not coming from a partisan perspective, stop whining and do what you're going to do. you don't need to telegraph every move and tell people and explain why. if you think you have the authority, then act. let's the chips fall where they may and as much as you can. >> don't you think on some level it's good strategy to make hay of the lawsuit they are bringing against them. it's good for democrats, republicans are suing me for doing something. >> that goes to my earlier point. everybody is playing to the base card and we're going to go out there and have this sort of conversation with our base and to howard's point, the rest of the country is saying, what about the rest of us. when the economy is downgraded to 2.9% or less growth when you're creating 100,000 versus 300,000 jobs a month. what about what we need to grow and lay on top of that, immigration -- >> did want to ask about that.
1:24 pm
>> and let me ask you this and governor dean after you respond. the immigration question, the republicans have been badly questioned on this esh yu and we thought it would get better in 2014 if they pursued a bipartisan reform. it has gotten worse. the shouting and vitreal and chaos the border crisis created and hardening on the right in terms of language and position against immigrants and theer receiptically by extension against the hispanic community could be very, very bad for a party looking to potentially climb out of this hole by 2016. >> this issue is on lockdown for the rest of the year period. the chips will fall where they may in the fall and beyond. >> governor dean, what happens on immigration reform with republicans? >> i think it's a disaster for the republicans. i think this big demonstration that they had blocking the immigrants from being detained at some center in california, every hispanic voter in america
1:25 pm
is watching that. and they know those aren't democrats out there demonstrati demonstrating. i think base he cically what ha in california is happening in the united states and it's ir reversible. if that gets the turnout out in congressional election, do have a shot at taking both house and sena senate. >> big talk from governor dean. >> not happening. >> gentlemen, thank you both for your time and thoughts. >> thank you. >> coming up, the thing that nobody wants to hear about their fourth of july weekend plans. i'm going to tell you what that thing is coming up next. you know that dream... on my count. ...the one where you step up and save the day? make it happen.
1:26 pm
(crowd) oh no... with verizon xlte. hey guys, i got it right here! we've doubled our 4g lte bandwidth in cities coast to coast. so take on more. with xlte. on the largest, most reliable 4g lte network. take them on the way you always have. live healthy and take one a day men's 50+. a complete multivitamin with 7 antioxidants to support cell health. age? who cares. >> honey, what's wrong? you okay? >> i just--i had a bad dream. you know, i'm gonna check on the kids. ♪ here it is. >> what's that? >> you know, that life insurance we talked about. it's been on my mind. >> you mean the term life insurance through the colonial penn
1:27 pm
patriot program. >> yeah, yeah, the one we really liked, remember? what do you think? >> i think you'd feel more secure if we had some additional life insurance. i would. >> you're right. i mean, we can't just rely on my coverage at work. >> it should be easy enough to apply. we'd just have to answer a few health questions. we won't even have to take a physical. let's go online and check it out. >> if you're between the ages of 18 and 75, you can apply for up to $50,000 of coverage with term life insurance through the colonial penn patriot program. why leave your family at financial risk if the unexpected happens? with a term life insurance policy through the coloal penn patriot program, you can help ease the burden of the unexpected and help your family cope financially. term is the simplest form of life insurance. this coverage is guaranteed renewable to age 90, and your benefit will not decrease, regardless of your age or any changes to your health. call or click now and you can get a free quote for up to $50,000 of coverage
1:28 pm
1:29 pm
arthur is threatening to wash out the holiday weekend along the east coast. earlier hurricane watches were issued. reid wiseman tweeted the photo from space saying hoping it leads to sea. looks mean. for more on exactly where tropical storm arthur is heading, let's go to the weather channel's julie martin. >> alex, here's the latest as of the 2:00 advisory from the national hurricane center. the good news a storm has not strengthened any. we're looking at winds at 60 miles per hour and now sitting at about 110 miles east northeast of cape canaveral and starting to move slowly, 7 miles per hour to the north trending a little bit eastward as well. that is also welcome news. if it continues to trend away from the u.s. coast. but we are expecting intense fiction of arthur and perhaps hurricane strength by friday in cape hatteras, the outer banks. that where we're looking at
1:30 pm
bigger impacts to be felt. sitting well off the coast of charleston, rough surf from charleston all the way up through north carolina and thursday evening, starting at about 7:00, 8:00, in through early friday morning, we're expecting the biggest impacts there along the outer banks of north carolina. beyond that, the storm moves out to sea, however leaves behind some very rough waters which is not welcome news of course for fourth of july vacationers. >> julie martin, thank you for the update. a key terror suspect makes another appearance in a civilian courtroom on american soil. could we be edging back to pre 9/11 criminal trials? i'll talk with the executive director of human rights watch about ahmed khattala's day in court. that's up next.
1:31 pm
1:33 pm
1:34 pm
of or chess straighting the attacks on the u.s. consulate in benghazi, today was his second court appearance. according to court documents filed by the justice department, khattala described as being motivated by an extremist ideology provided u.s. interrogators with volume tear statements corroborating key facts. evidence that khattala expressed concern and opposition to the presence of an american facility in benghazi in the days leading up to the attack and night of the attack, he entered the consulate compound to supervise the exploitation of material from the scene. she did not object it his continued detention but added there was an utter lack of evidence of her client's involvement in the attacks. on saturday, khattala arrived on u.s. soil after spending ten days on a navy warship in the
1:35 pm
atlantic ocean. unshack unshackled, he pled not guilty to a conspiracy charge, one that would carry a death penalty sentence. the hearing lasted ten minutes but will be the most challenging before the justice department in years. khattala is the first to be capture and tried on charges related to the benghazi attacks. joining me now is executive director of human rights watch, ken roth. >> nice to be back, alex. >> let me ask what your thoughts are in terms of administration's handling of khattala. specifically his i guess we'll call it detention on a boat in the atlantic ocean before he was read his miranda rights. >> there are two things going on. one is the administration will probably rely on what's known as a public safety exception to the miranda rule. that's designed so if i hide a bomb in times square and police arrest me, they get to ask me where the bomb is before they read me my rights. whether that applies in this
1:36 pm
case or not will have to be lit dated. there's a duty on the government to present the suspect before a federal judge without undue delay. >> exactly. >> and you know, did that happen? you may have heard of these things called airplanes that most people take across the atlantic, we don't usually go by boat. >> and the administration has a convoluted explanation as to why they took him over the ocean because they would have stopped to refuel in another country and gotten permission and also said it took longer than usual to make the voyage because of technical delays or technical difficulties. >> they can litigate all of this. what the supreme court is clear about, without undue delay, doesn't allow for delay just to interrogate. that's the epitome of unnecessary delay. >> and i guess i wonder from a human rights perspective, there's the argument and concern about rule of law and adhering to laws of the u.s. criminal justice system. at the same time, there's the political pressure to sort of
1:37 pm
get as much information as possible from the suspect for national security encounter terrorism purposes and there are republicans in congress who say he should never be read his miranda rights and should be pi and thrown in gitmo. >> the right wing ideologues say military commissions tough, civilian court is obama being weak again. we should unpack that. the so-called tough military commissions have managed to convict eight people in the last decade. at the same time, while the civilian courts have had successfully concluded prosecutions of 500 people. so which is more effective? plus, the civilian courts have their problems but they are widely considered fair. the military commissions are a disaster and making up as they go, and fbi is snooping on attorney/client privilege and setting up rules to coerce statements from witnesses to be introduced. this is not going to be perceived as a fair let a lone
1:38 pm
expeditious way to try anybody. the 9/11 suspects if brought to new york, those trials would be over with. i went down to guantanamo to watch the arraignment and they haven't started the trial and the trial won't start before obama leaves office. >> let me ask you about the future of gitmo. the civilian trials have a much better record and cheaper and get prosecutions, this is going to be a difficult case for the doj. in so far as -- it's not an open and shut case in terms of the guilt. should it work out as it with for administration in terms of the civilian trial, do you think is -- adds yet another log to the fire in terms of we must close gitmo? it is too expensive and doesn't make sense. by the way, you know this well, in terms of radicalizing people, gitmo is a black mark on the american conscious and black mac that has seen the world over. >> gitmo is a gift to the
1:39 pm
terrorist recruiters, let's call it what it is. the ab bu khattala case is consistent with what obama has done, he has ooded nobody to gu guantanamo. he treats it as a bush legacy problem, not his own. that said, he has not been nearly as courageous as he should have been in closing guantanamo and congress mounted obstruction after obstruction. there are a handful of people that should be prosecuted in civilian court. well over half, even bush said don't pose a threat. they are from yemen and waiting for yemen to get their act together in terms of monitoring these people and be sent back to yemen. finally, there's a small group of what's called 30 or so people that are supposedly too dangerous to release but can't be prosecuted because the bush torture or whatever. there are a lot of dangerous people out there in the world that happen to be at guantanamo. we should shut the facility and stop the stain on america's reputation. >> ken roth, thank you as always
1:40 pm
for your time and thoughts, we look forward to having you back. >> coming up, rick santorum is dipping his toe into the movie business. you heard me say that correctly. and it looks like old steady eddie is taking a stab at the horror genre. details on that are just ahead. if you wear a denture, touch it with your tongue. if your denture moves, it can irritate your gums. try fixodent plus gum care. it helps stop denture movement and prevents gum irritation. fixodent. and forget it.
1:41 pm
a body at rest tends to stay at rest... while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can actually ease arthritis symptoms. but if you have arthritis, staying active can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain so your body can stay in motion. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain and inflammation. plus, in clinical studies, celebrex is proven to improve daily physical function so moving is easier. celebrex can be taken with or without food. and it's not a narcotic. you and your doctor should balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naproxen and meloxicam have the same cardiovascular warning. they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death. this chance increases if you have heart disease or risk factors such as high blood pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods.
1:42 pm
nsaids, like celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions, or stomach and intestine problems, such as bleeding and ulcers, which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. don't take celebrex if you have bleeding in the stomach or intestine, or had an asthma attack, hives, other allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history. and find an arthritis treatment for you. visit celebrex.com and ask your doctor about celebrex. for a body in motion.
1:43 pm
ugh. heartburn. did someone say burn? try alka seltzer reliefchews. they work just as fast and taste better than tums smoothies assorted fruit. mmm. amazing. yeah, i get that a lot. alka seltzer heartburn reliefchews. enjoy the relief. i'll ask the national urban league's mark morial and charles owingledree coming up next, but first josh lip ton has the market wrap. >> here's a look at how stocks stand going into tomorrow. stocks closed mixed today with the dow and s&p pushing into record territory. the dow climbed 20 points and
1:44 pm
s&p closed up 1 point while nasdaq closed lower by 1 point. that's it from cnbc, first in business worldwide. i may not look it, but i'm pretty tech savvy. i just saved 15% on car insurance in 15 minutes. don't live in beatrice's world. live in the modern world where 7 and a half minutes could save you on car insurance. esurance. click or call.
1:45 pm
1:47 pm
to enforce the constitutional right to vote, those are the first seven words of the most consequential piece of legislation of the last century, the civil rights act of 1964. 50 years ago today, president lyndon johnson signed a bill into law surrounded by a bipartisan group of legislators and leaders of the civil rights movement, including a still controversial figure named martin luther king jr. that constitution right, the right to vote had itself been guaranteed a century before, the bill's passage would be only the beginning of a very, very long struggle to enforce it. >> tonight i urge every public official, every religious leader, every business and professional man, every working
1:48 pm
man, every housewife. i urge every american, to join in this effort to bring justice and hope to all our people and to bring piece to our land. >> the by him's political repercussions were nearly incal cuable at the time, it's effect on education was merely clear, demying blacks the ability to eat at a restaurant and not only the south in places like new york now city that was outlawed. school is he agree gas station was put into practice nationwide after the passage of the act and ban on employment description because of race, color or national origin not only protected minorities but allowed more women to enter the workforce. over the past three decades, those historic achievements are slowly being eroded. in 2007 the supreme court struck
1:49 pm
down in seattle and louisville and high court invalidated section four of the voting rights act of 1965, which was a companion to the civil rights act. and since 2010, 21 states, including almost all of the former confederacy have enacted new voter restrictions which disproportionately affect people of color. 50 years on enforcing the constitutional right to vote, those first seven words of the civil rights act remains a challenge that we've seem less prepared to tackle nearly half a century later. joining me now, charles ogle tree and mark morial. justice roberts in 2007 famously said the way toe stop discrimination on the basis of race is stop discriminating on the basis of race. have we forgotten why we have a civil rights movement in the first place? >> i don't know if we have but chief roberts has forgotten why
1:50 pm
we have it. even though we are 50 years removed from the civil rights act, we're facing some of the same problems in the year 2014 that african-americans were facing in native americans and latinos were facing in the 1930s, '40s and 50s and 60s. i'm glad to see progress. we've got a black president own black attorney general and blacks in business leading institutions of high ed ed indicatied indication. all sorts of problems in the 21st century that we thought were involved with the voting rights act more than 50 years ago. >> mark, when it comes to voting rights act and the way the supreme court dismantled parts of it, it feels there is not the coalition that there was 50 years ago to pass reforms.
1:51 pm
as richard points out, there are no real republican leaders on civil rights or voting rights aside from jim sen sen brener. >> alex, good to be with professor ogletree, it's important as we celebrate the 50th anniversary to understand its passage was a bipartisan exercise. led by president johnson. that its passage was a a part of civil activism, marches, popular movement which took place that really held the country accountable which led to the passage of the civil rights of 1964. that that passage also came ten years after the supreme court unanimously in brown versus board struck down school segregation on a legal basis.
1:52 pm
now, important ly -- all of thee decisions by a 5-4 majority, bent on turning hands of time back eroding if you will the efforts of 50 years ago to make the nation a better nation. that's a clear and present danger to progress, a clear and present danger to all of the need that's there to do the unfinished business of civil rights in the 21 t century. >> on mark's point, part of the problem the court has undue power. incapable of constructing policy or legs lating at this point. to the earlier point, there are no republicans save for one, eric cantor was at one point trying to work towards restoring parts of section 4 and effect e effectively tossed out of
1:53 pm
office. i wonder what you think happened in the interim between the 1960s and now? >> i couldn't hear the last party you're saying but i want to respond if i can. >> go ahead. >> can you hear me? >> yep. i think we're having problems with your audio, professor, i'm going to go to mark -- >> one of the things that happened is that we have lost a lot when there's a bipartisan group or women and men, mainly men in the 1950s, running the court and country and didn't see race as something that needed changed. we have now had a big change in our country and i think that's important. and i think you see african-americans are voting in record numbers, people are looking for jobs, hoping they can be employed. we just don't have the support of congress. i heard the senator from kentucky say after the president was elected in 2008, we're going to make him a one-term president. that was his legacy and
1:54 pm
republicans posed every sengle thing, jobs, education. we're beginning to see things changing now. i think the great things that happened are the president's endorsing the idea of my brotherbrothe brother's keeper, the idea that people who have a record can still vote, shouldn't be deprifd the right to vote. and one of the republicans from kentucky supports the idea of people having a record being able to vote. he wants to put the folks in a sense back to work. i think those are good things in the 21st century and i'm not giving up. i think we can bypass the court. the court has nine members and respond to legislative decisions and executive decisions but the court doesn't have the power to do a lot of things that the court did before. and i think we need to look at other areas, other important venues to make sure that the 21st century is as good if not better than the 20th century was. >> mark, what are those avenues?
1:55 pm
we know about moral mondays and we know what happened in mississippi? >> the best way to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the voting rights act of the civil rights act is for people to vote with a vengeance in this fall's election. for people to be more civically engaged and recognize there's a war going on in the republican party between an extremist far right and what i call old traditional republican mainstream values. and that is pulling the country and pulling the republican party certainly to the right. but we've got to vote with a vengeance and be civically engaged and recognize if we're not careful, the nation's progress of the last 50 years will be significantly eroded and our children will fight the battles of our grandparents again. >> marc morial and charles ogletree, thank you both. if you're heading to the movies this summer and in the mood for nazis and ronald reagan, rick santorum has just the ticket for you.
1:56 pm
get out the popcorn. when it comes to good nutrition...i'm no expert. that would be my daughter -- hi dad. she's a dietitian. and back when i wasn't eating right, she got me drinking boost. it's got a great taste, and it helps give me the nutrition i was missing. helping me stay more like me. [ female announcer ] boost complete nutritional drink has 26 essential vitamins and minerals, including calcium and vitamin d to support strong bones and 10 grams of protein to help maintain muscle. all with a delicious taste. grandpa! [ female announcer ] stay strong, stay active with boost. you know that dream... grandpa! on my count. ...the one where you step up and save the day? make it happen. (crowd) oh no... with verizon xlte. hey guys, i got it right here! we've doubled our 4g lte bandwidth in cities coast to coast. so take on more. with xlte. on the largest, most reliable 4g lte network.
1:57 pm
1:58 pm
1:59 pm
just in time for summer blockbuster season, a sneak peek at the sensational new epic, not stone or scorcese but santorum, the man who compared gay sex to beastialty and said contraception is quote, not okay, that guy is getting into the movie making business. his production company has a brand-new film due out this fall and just as the supreme court's hobby lobby decision came down on monday, we got our first look at the trailer. >> millions of good americans think birth control and abortion are blessing. >> it's a good thing for this country. >> when religious conscious is
2:00 pm
violated that's our signal that government has gone too far. >> it is called one generation away, the erosion of relinlous liberty and along with spine tingling echo effects, it features ronald reagan and lots and lots of white people and what summer block buster would be complete without them, nazi. when you play the nazi card, you must be winning. it is out in september and not yet rated but we can safely predict an r for red meat. the ed show is up next. good evening, americans and welcome to "the ed show" i'm ready to go. let's get to work. >> usa! >> take back america. >> illegals are streaming over because it zntd seem anyone is stopping them. >> protesters pushed their way in and blocked the road. >> kind of an
141 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
MSNBC West Television Archive The Chin Grimes TV News Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on